I wonder if the stern thruster was programmed to cancel the propeller walk from what seems to look like a left handed cpp. I hope they make that stern thruster stopped as it takes alot of the realism away if that stern thruster is working automatically. Also notice in zero pitch the propeller stopped this shouldn't be the case she shoild be turning with either slightly negative or positive pitch in pitch zero.
I worked on a ship, similar to this. This one is inspired by the Sietas Type 168. They are propeled by an MAK 9M43C, and ita very powerful. Looking forward to test this sim on my own
Please tell me why Sietas 168 actually has a stern thruster? Not many feeders actually have a stern thruster, and there are even bigger feeders than this that don't have it.
@@mhspotting9177 So, it depens on the one who orders the ship. Either you have a Becker Rudder, where the end of the rudder can turn until 85° if I remeber correct. Or you can install a, in comparison to the bow thruster, a smaller stern thruster, if you dont have a Becker Rudder. These options are for easier manouvering while changing the Terminal in the same port
Look like the rendering of the waves is quite taxing, it's clearly doing serious calculations for the level of wave simulation. Militaries and contractors have amazing setups for wave simulation so the fact this can be done on a home pc is a feat on it's own. and as for the radar, you could reduce some CPU overhead by using the FILTER SEA option on the tip right of that pop out window. Such heavy returns it's constantly calculating and giving very slow refresh rates. If you can tune these independently you may have a much smoother experience. Great video!!!
It's the Algoryx engine running the waves and hydrodynamics sonyes very CPU intensive as far as I know. Lots of optimisation to be done later I assume.
Nice model. 👍🏻 But CPP props should not stop when changing from ahead to astern. Reason is CPP is used to give you better reaction time (in constant rpm mode when maneuvering) while having the shaft rotating at all times. The only time the shaft stops is when the gearbox is disengaged and the brake is engaged eg KaMeWa CPP. Otherwise you would vaporize the clutch and the clutchshoes.
"life onboard" will never be a thing. Simply because this is supposed to be a ship simulator and not sims 4. They will not waste time and resources on that ever. What they could do is add interiors and then we could add moving people through the mission editor. This was possible with ship simulator extremes.
I'm personally not looking for a sims like life on board, more an extension of the simulation, so that for example a trip to the ECR is needed to activate an emergency bypass pump for example. More of a ship operations sim. The other direction is something like microsoft will do with flight sim, with mission simulations, which ship sim extreme s kind of supported.
I wonder if the stern thruster was programmed to cancel the propeller walk from what seems to look like a left handed cpp. I hope they make that stern thruster stopped as it takes alot of the realism away if that stern thruster is working automatically. Also notice in zero pitch the propeller stopped this shouldn't be the case she shoild be turning with either slightly negative or positive pitch in pitch zero.
The side thrusters are CPP just as the main prop. Their supposed to be spinning all the time for the most responsive effect when manouvering
Thanks for the additional details
Ah OK makes sense now but main prop should still spin
I worked on a ship, similar to this. This one is inspired by the Sietas Type 168. They are propeled by an MAK 9M43C, and ita very powerful. Looking forward to test this sim on my own
Please tell me why Sietas 168 actually has a stern thruster? Not many feeders actually have a stern thruster, and there are even bigger feeders than this that don't have it.
@@mhspotting9177 So, it depens on the one who orders the ship. Either you have a Becker Rudder, where the end of the rudder can turn until 85° if I remeber correct. Or you can install a, in comparison to the bow thruster, a smaller stern thruster, if you dont have a Becker Rudder. These options are for easier manouvering while changing the Terminal in the same port
Look like the rendering of the waves is quite taxing, it's clearly doing serious calculations for the level of wave simulation. Militaries and contractors have amazing setups for wave simulation so the fact this can be done on a home pc is a feat on it's own. and as for the radar, you could reduce some CPU overhead by using the FILTER SEA option on the tip right of that pop out window. Such heavy returns it's constantly calculating and giving very slow refresh rates. If you can tune these independently you may have a much smoother experience. Great video!!!
It's the Algoryx engine running the waves and hydrodynamics sonyes very CPU intensive as far as I know. Lots of optimisation to be done later I assume.
Nice model. 👍🏻 But CPP props should not stop when changing from ahead to astern. Reason is CPP is used to give you better reaction time (in constant rpm mode when maneuvering) while having the shaft rotating at all times. The only time the shaft stops is when the gearbox is disengaged and the brake is engaged eg KaMeWa CPP. Otherwise you would vaporize the clutch and the clutchshoes.
Can anyone play this already in early access? The whole pris a little confusing.
Hello, as a deck cadet, I am considering purchasing a 6-month subscription. Would you recommend it?
I think there is no other simulation that comes close at the moment
Of course not... Boicot games with pay as you go.... Teach them a lesson.
@@thessalonicianAbsolutely agree, avoid.
how did youget it ??
How to download?
The nautis home website
in real life to be going full atern to stop a ship is usaally an emergency
where can i download it
www.vstepsimulation.com/nautis-simulator/nautis-home/
Good video
This is just dead boring! Monthly subscription and 2000's graphics!! No life onboard, no bridges, no lights, nothing...
I really hope they bring some of those features to it too. A hardcore ship sim will have a very small audience.
"life onboard" will never be a thing. Simply because this is supposed to be a ship simulator and not sims 4. They will not waste time and resources on that ever. What they could do is add interiors and then we could add moving people through the mission editor. This was possible with ship simulator extremes.
I'm personally not looking for a sims like life on board, more an extension of the simulation, so that for example a trip to the ECR is needed to activate an emergency bypass pump for example. More of a ship operations sim. The other direction is something like microsoft will do with flight sim, with mission simulations, which ship sim extreme s kind of supported.
@@shipbuildingx Some sort of life onboard won't make the sim Sims... See MSFS for example, which is a simulator that can't be compared with no other.