Aircraft Review: Citation Sovereign and Sovereign+
Вставка
- Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
- Join jetAVIVA on this comprehensive video review of the Citation Sovereign and Sovereign+ ("Plus"). Learn about the lineage of the Sovereign, the impressive performance, and different configurations.
Contact jetAVIVA with any questions: sales@jetaviva.com www.jetAVIVA.com
I have ordered two.
I helped design the interiors of both. They forgot to mention the ovens (usually microwave, but also convection option, but, NOT both). A hot meal on a long flight.
Excellent host. 😃👏
Nice , comfortable .....
Good looking...
Thank-you Cessna X....
You have everything.....
What's the price
Is it 6 passenger plus two pilots or 6 people including flight crew?
The Citation Sovereign can come with seating configurations of 8, 9 or 10 passenger seats in the main cabin of the aircraft. This does not include the two crew seats in the cockpit.
@@jetAVIVA thank you sir. That is what I was told by a few leasing agencies, but for some odd reasons did not have the full 10 passenger option, I'm looking for 10 passenger charter for corporate purposes for 2 days Do you offer private charter service?
@@aky19832001 We are an aircraft Broker, so unfortunately we would not be able to help you out with Charter services. If you're ever interested in purchasing, give us a call!
off topic, but do you think Cessna will ever equip the CJ4 with a G3000 avioncs package and drop the proline 21 package? Which do you prefer?
Hi Brian, great question. Cessna tried something similar with the "Alpine Edition" CJ2+ retrofit package which included upgrading the ProLine 21 avionics suite to Garmin G3000. Unfortunately, the package was price prohibitive and only one CJ2+ was ever fitted with the Alpin Package. Time will tell if Textron tries something similar with the CJ4 but I wouldn't count on it. While it sounds good on paper, the certification process would be expensive and Cessna may not want to risk cutting into CJ3+ sales.
G3000 vs ProLine: Both are great avionics suites and both do a really good job of minimizing pilot workload and making it easier to fly your aircraft single pilot. At the end of the day it comes down to pilot preference, and most pilots tend to stick with what they already have experience with. That being said, its a fairly easy transition into either system regardless of your previous experience.
Feel free to give us a call anytime if you want to discuss things in more detail. We would love to hear from you. jetAVIVA - 512.410.0295
@@jasondeifik781 Not to mention some of us old farts still prefer the Collins system
Does it have a warranty forever like my Hyundai. ?
Superb ❤️🆒👍🇧🇩
Can you fly one of these alone?
You can try! But unfortunately, not legally :) The Sovereign is a two-crew jet.
Legally, both require two pilots.
However, the Sovereign+ has a very clean, clear instrument panel (Garmin 5000). I would feel very comfortable letting either the pilot or copilot fly while the other crewperson sleeps (long flights).
Porque não ponhe comentários em português
You started out by saying, Kevin, speed, range ?
cabin, not kevin lol
Can't think of a mid-size jet that doesn't have single point refueling. Not sure why you brag on this one having it ? Cessna leather still looks cheaper than on a comparable aircraft, always has.
Potty......
Ryan in the aviation industry that’s what they’re called.
1800 lbs of fuel per hour.... 264 gallons.. that’s thirsty in case you missed it.
A rather juvenile comment
The SR-71 carried 82,000 lbs of fuel (that's about 12,000 gallons). It cruised at mach 3+ burning 3000 gallons an hour, or about 50 gallons a minute...a little less than a gallon per second of flight.
A Boeing 737-6 thru -9 burns about 750 gallons an hour.
264 per hour on 1700 gallons aboard the Soverign still gives you 6+ hours of flight. Not that thirsty, really. After all, the SR-71 only carried 2 people, and cameras. :-)
Dool fms ? Ha ha it’s dual. Pronounce the “U” try it
The candidate of the poor the presidency of Brazil, flies with a luxurious aircraft citation, if it is candidate of the poor, how do you manage to pay?
These are cheap compared to some.
Isso Foi Totalmente Muito Ofensivo;-;!
This is an OUTSTANDING video, very informative, well produced and will do wonders for brand recognition and ultimately sales. MORE PLEASE!
Great production and host. Solid.
Very nice quality film! Nice aircraft!
I've built alot of wings for those.
Beauttiful aircraft.!
If only planes were cheaper
Legacy 500???? Never.....
Nicely put together and narrated . . .
Very nice....Thank you...
A potty huh?
can cross the atlantic ocean ?
Billy, Yes. The range is +/- 3,000 nautical miles and the aircraft also does Hawaii well.
thanks.
@@jetAVIVA what about Pacific
@@longshot4484 yes, with some island stops. It cannot make it nonstop across the Pacific.
Fuck, ingles, count, live, estate, house
your name is Jet Aviva?
What kind of legroom does it have?
I forget the exact numbers. Two full-sized men (6ft, 2m tall) will need to overlap feet when facing.
Always the same sales pitch than decades ago. My "brand X" jet is the best in the market. Then pick any metrics that are mostly unverified claims, then finish by a thorough description of tiny details that makes you believe they come free and are just a bargain. Just go for it, buy it pls. At some time I remember Learjet used to claim their Lear were the most "efficient" "versatile" etc. etc. Same with Falcons ads etc. Makes you wonder. Gulfstream will also clain they have "efficient " airplanes yet they are gas guzzlers because they are speedy and big machine. They will just adapt the metric to look good. Like efficient by pound flown on long range or anything like that fuzzy metrics.
Can’t say the “shitter” to the mega-rich? What the hell is a potty?
Toilets are called potties in the aviation industry, just as they're called heads when aboard boats.
Bombardier DHC-8-402PF 2000 Air
You say double wheels on each leg ensure a smooth landing? This is untrue. Why not 4 wheels per leg to make it really smooth. Or are all single wheeled planes going to make rough landings? Do you see? You talk bollocks. The advantage is redundancy and load sharing, this aircraft is too much for just one single tyre set up.
You're not wrong, SandhoeFlyer. The double wheels primary function is for load sharing and adds redundancy. However, the smooth landing comment was really more about the trailing link gear. However, you can't argue that if one tire failed during landing the double wheels wouldn't provide a smoother landing, right? :)
Minutes 1:27ERJ-145??
Very Nice
An engaging promotion of these aircraft options.
Why not General Electric (GE) or Rolls Royce (RR) engines?
Excellent.
Singel pilot operate?
Hello Felix, This is not a single pilot operation. Thanks!
If you can install swooplets - then why say winglets? Make your mind up.... but the funny point, you keep saying Kevin.. when you are trying to say “Cabin” and what is DOOL ?
Great plane,but nothing beats Falcon