@@sharuraudio The best at imagining yourself to be the best. There is a graph that plots your use of specs and how worthless they are to the actual listening experience over time. I never saw you mention that certain designers factor/add certain types of distortion as voicing. Why doesn't a $14,000 pass labs or a $350,000 Dan D'Augustino amp measure with absolute accuracy? Because they are voiced. They are designed to sound appealing the way humans hear. Just a wild guess, but they could engineer and explain rings around you without breaking a sweat. I've talked with Nelson Pass. You are no Nelson Pass.
@@scottlowell493There are no audible differences between solid-state amps, providing they are functioning within normal parameters. You can look up blind test studies throughout the decades and you'll find none that could differentiate between them.
Here's the thing though about your assessment of measurement. Everything you mention and the reason why these reviewers are bad seems to be based around the fact that they don't care about measurements or they endorse products that don't measure well. Well I'm of the opinion that measurements can tell us something about a product and can be useful as a guide for purchasing but at the same time except for speakers measurements can't really tell us how a product sounds. And I believe relying on measurements tell you how a product sounds it's just as bad or even worse than convincing yourself through faiths and bias that something" sounds" a particular way. And the majority of the products that I've reviewed or enjoy listening to, probably measure badly, does that mean my opinion about that thing is invalid? I think at the end of the day what we are doing besides the act of listening to products and ultimately reviewing them, really is grounded in this aspect of subjectivity. And it's for that reason the majority of my reviews when it comes to products, although here lately I've been doing more album reviews, is rooted in the idea that " hey I liked this, but you might not". Anyway bud this is my first time watching your videos and I have to say I like the tone and I've watched a few others too, so keep it up. My only critique would be is it seems like the majority of your videos or let's say quite a bit of them, seem to be focused around the idea of hating on other people for their opinion or their opinion of you or how you guys differed in a conversation. I watch UA-cam reviewers because I enjoy watching them and the content they create. And I know I don't just speak for myself when I say that it gets old pretty fast watching reviewers just diss other people as a form of content. The only other critique that I could truly make is maybe you have a bit too much confidence in yourself. Not don't take that the wrong way but I've always been very leery of people as soon as they say that they know the ultimate truth or they know the real answers or anything like that.
Waterboarding was once considered to be the best way to force information from captives but governments have learned that being forced to sit through PassionforSound videos is far more effective.
Joshua Valour is great example of Dunning-Kruger effect; he knows some basic things about audio, but with more complicated things fails horribly. You should also mention Darko Audio, but I think you could easily make another Top 5 Worst Audio Reviewers xd
A long time ago, I wrote Mr. Valour a comment about appearing to be the epitome of Dunning-Kruger and it was great because it seemed to really tick him off and he sent me a "how dare you" reply. It was hilarious.
The Honest Audiophile? His outer ears (capture devices) are so mishaped, that frequencies entering the ear canal? Would be wildly skewed. Passion thinks he's somehow being thorough, just because of the continual repeat, continual repeat .. con.. Joshua? Cares about the opening glamour shots of gear. No other substance is evident. The Cheap Audio Man is another eegit!!
When joshua valor first started I made a negative comment on one of his videos. and he called me an ahole lol. I already knew from that time he was gonna be a schill reviewer
Joshua just wants views and subscribers. When Cyberpunk 2077 was about to drop he actually made a video titled something along the lines of, "The best headphones to use for playing Cyberpunk 2077." I commented that he was pathetic and also told him I was showing myself the door. Never went back. Plus, he doesn't know what he's talking about...so there's that.
It's a bad sign when a reviewer spends more time on their beard than learning about audio. I would trust a reviewer that looks like a bum over a slick rick salesman glossy beard type. All the greatest minds look like bums with crazy hair like Doc Brown.
I know this video is 8 months old but I have to point out that I have rarely heard anyone exhibit such an extraordinary lack of self awareness. Perhaps one day you will grow up a bit and then have something worthwhile to say. I hope so for all our sakes.
Zreviews is probably the man who has influenced the most amount of people to buy really bad and stupid stuff on a constant basis. Whenever he does a new review and praises something (which is all the time) I confronted him in the comments why he doesnt simply just rec one heaphone that is a cut above the rest and he literally said " its better to have 100 flavours than 1 "
Yeah, I was about to say this. I don't wan to be rude, but I think he's mentally compromised. He's literally a seller. He gets paid for the stuff he pushes on people. How is somebody like that still called a reviewer? I know there are other people, you can call this, like Crin, but they are more honest and have dignity. Z reviews on the other hand can is aggressive about it. He'll argue that he's unbiased, because he gets paid for selling gear and try to tear apart any rational criticism of him.
Watched it, didn’t see me. But now I’m genuinely curious what Sharur would tier rank us all at and why. I gotta be C tier or worse. And I wouldn’t even disagree. Sharur’s perspective on my demos is true, from one vantage point on what reviews should be like anyway. Though, I see myself as a SS tier review god regardless. If I hear anything else I’ll ignore it.
@@dansaudioreviews Dan, I find your iems' sound demos useful enough. I don't judge their accuracy - at least we can have an idea how they really sound. For the rest it's your taste, it's your ears and I can't care less. As to Sharur - sometimes he's right, sometimes he's funny and I can clearly see where and when.
I don't mind listening to the honest audiophile Dave.....it drives me nuts to watch him Jingle and wave the Iem's in front of the camera, like he's trying to sell them to me like they do in a Morocco Bazaar or something.
I understand the fact that you realize you were wrong and learn from it, but I still can't understand how a channel that propagated that the ER2SE was the best headphone in the world, now considers it just ok, worse than others who said they were bad. To find something good and the next week "yeah I was wrong, this sucks", how to trust a reviewer like that?
He is still learning and it seems that he discovered Audiosciencereview recently and have been echoing things he reads there, sometimes not quite fully understanding whatever he just learned. He is probably still very young and has not developed the virtue of avoiding being ridiculed.
Sharur is afraid of MD Jacques, btw I didn't watch this video yet, I'm in a recliner eating chips and will soon shower and turn on my humidifier in my bedroom and bust then get up to clean off and then go to bed, maybe I'll watch this tomorrow if you ask
Watched the vid now, pretty good but they do add important opinions in this space. Its a shame that most of the well known reviewers just copy paste the same things down to exact nouns in their reviews. Er2se still mogs every iem while running a lawnmower or weedwhacker
I really like No themes reviews style , truth speaker. Anyway I like people who has the balls to call out others , the truth is if they was on the list they should take a look at how they are doing it maybe the can improve . We all have a right to judge , that statement you shouldn't judge is taking wrong , we judge daily and judge the type of girl we want. So Bravo I gave dumbs up.
@Sharur1 I like to know why he suck ? He has an original style doing reviews , his breakdown and calling out bs from companies proves he's not being bought by them , I can't say that for none of the many reviewers .
What do you think of GoldenSound's MQA controversy series? I think it was good, but a bit too alarmist, though it is a big egg on Tidal's face for making false promises.
Exactly. There are few reviewers out there who can say they have confronted some of the industry on their marketing bullshit and had a genuine effect. And they did it using the scientific method and not just flinging abuse around. If you were in any way objective, Sharur, you would give credit for that, but unfortunately your vast yet pitiful ego won't allow it. I really need to stop this troll feeding and accept the fact that we all talk shit when young, but, boy, you annoy me.
I do think there is a bit of stupidity, but in the end, this is how they make their living. If they go around saying, yeah this shit sounds the same, no one is going to sponsor them. We call this financial freedom but moral bankruptcy.
The problem is living in a small town I have no access to these things without ordering then in . I have to trust their judgment even though I suspect I’m being shilled
I'm in my '50s. I'm lucky to have good hearing for my age. Most people in their '50s hear somewhere around 30Hz to 12Khz. Lucky for me, I hear beyond that. Not 20Hz to 20Khz! NO! I'm not spending $50K on speakers. I won't spend $30K on a amp. How much money does one need to spend on audio hardware just to listen to music (or other)? It's money you can spend on travel, living, enjoying life, and many other things. Nothing wrong with good things in life...but...at one point it's all about the $$$.
They're not audio engineers, nor are they university graduates in physics studies in sound. They're on UA-cam to make money. Plus, how much money does one need to spend to hear "good" sound? You don't need to spend $100K to get good sound. If you want precise sound, like that needed in a laboratory or recording studio, that's a different scenario.
Jay? Better than Golden Sound? Jay can barely get through a review without saying "Nuanced", constantly repeats the same words/phrases... in the same sentence(!)and loves to remind you that he worked in a High-End store.
I honestly want whatever you're smoking 😂 ( I love me a good roast, but you're painting a misleading picture of youtubers who make "free content") When you have no-credibility on a topic like speakers.... you're just asking to be roasted yourself. Otherwise good luck with the channel it's cool to have differing opinions I guess. 🤪
Classic Sharur trolling while doing good killing the snake oil in this overly subjective hobby. As always, thanks for the vid (wish it would be in more detail though).
This guy is spot on. These mofo reviewers just sit and talks but never actual play demo to backup their claim. Well, except for golden sound but most of his details analysis seem doesnt match what i heard. The Jay kid seem to only reviews stuff that only 1% people can afford and probably no one can tell if his review are correct because it out of 99% of population reach. I stop watching thses mofo nonesense talk and just go by the graph.
Forget knowledge for a moment and let's discuss credibility. I'm not a youtuber. If a company like Hifiman or Focal or whatever sends you a free headphone to review and of course you say "it has no impact on my review" then cut the product to shreds...will that company ever send you anything ever again? I don't think so. You ever heard of Olav's Gadgets? This guy calls most audio equipment junk. So what's his angle? Is he honest or is he selling his own product? My point is....how the hell do any of us trust any of you at all? Someone always seems to be selling something. I'd like to just have a reviewer simply say "sure, this is a new headphone but you don't need it. It's just another version of the 1000 other headphones out there", etc.... Sorry, i went on a rant.
You definitely forgot "pursuit of perfect sound". This guy is just dribble at its best, AND its sometimes takes for videos to show case a review. ( more clicks I suppose) yep definately the top 3 worst reviewers. And judging on how his system is set up, I dont think he knows much at all. Anyway probably a nice bloke though
What do you think of Z reviews? Ive heard very mixed opinions about him. All I really know is he recommended Grado SR60X and I wasn't a fan. (My $20 IEMs and $40 Koss KSC35 wireless sounded better imo, but then again I am a far cry from an audiophile) I am still a pretty big noob when it comes to this hobby so I can't tell if he is legit or not.
Just putting up graphs of specs and statistics say nothing about how humans hear, the interaction with the room, electronics and eq. One of the best measured loudspeakers of all times, vandersteen 2ce (late Audio engineer/watchdog Richard Hardesty). Given that, they should be perfect speakers for everyone right? Not everyone loves soft and laid back. The measurements don't show that. Wilson watt puppy 5: measured horribly, but blew away critics and fans. From what I have seen of your channel, it's like an incomplete equation. it's like you are attempting to reach people via attempting to divide by zero.
Actually I don't mind Passion for Sound. But other jerks mentioned especially Joshua, Dishonest Audiophile and GoldenSound are the crappiest crap. I would add Bad Guy Deaf Ears and Zeos for sure.
@@sergiymarchenko1002 Bad guy atleast has some substance though. For eg. his conclusion about how bass guitars don't sound correct on Harman bass shelf is spot on.
@@r91playsind that deaf prick costed me a big chunk of waisted money in the very beginning of my hobby so...I dunno what you're talking about. NEVER AGAIN.
Yeah I expected Z in top 5. At first I took him sort of seriously while my gut telling me he is lying or making stuff up most of the times. Now I get it, he is mostly pretending to understand everything he talks about.
About GoldenSound: what about his alleged work demonstrating MQA technology is a fraud to the degree he made the company that promotes MQA to change the way it describes MQA?
Jay's Iyagi is all visual style and editing while throwing in audiophile terms like 'nuance' and 'sibilance'. Pretentious but with flare and I can appreciate it on youtube because those more science based reviewers are so dull.
Where did you demonstrate that bigger amp gives placebo about bass ? Output impedance will change the FR of the HD650, wouldn't it ? I hate Valour too btw.
"No scientific basis"..... but the channel goes to great lengths to drag massive speakers outside to test anechoic response.......... Be careful with your specious conclusions, it makes you look as bad as those that you criticise.
You just listed best content creators in this field. Everyone has their learning curve and they share their experiences with audio gear. You need to list a guy like Ron from New Record Day who only praises about GR Research. All the biased reviewers(or content creators). You just try to put your name out there by trash talking other big names? You will pay for this big time. You don’t even have the creativity like the ones mentioned. You are making fool of yourself. Shame on you.
The name is just an old relic from audio history. I don't earn royalties, lol Studer last mame pretty huge in music industry, though. Beatles white album was recorded on Studer gear. Dre used Studer gear. Cheryl Studer is an opera singer. Harmon kardon bought the Studer name out years back now though. So whoever owns HK now owns Studer brand, but nothing is ever produced under it anymore.
Honorable mention: Sharur
no
😁😆
@@sharuraudio yes
I agree. Graph is everything for this guy.
Big facts.
You forgot to put yourself at the top. Watched a few videos and I gotta say I’m impressed. Never thought someone can be this bad at doing something
i'm best
@@sharuraudio The best at imagining yourself to be the best. There is a graph that plots your use of specs and how worthless they are to the actual listening experience over time. I never saw you mention that certain designers factor/add certain types of distortion as voicing. Why doesn't a $14,000 pass labs or a $350,000 Dan D'Augustino amp measure with absolute accuracy? Because they are voiced. They are designed to sound appealing the way humans hear. Just a wild guess, but they could engineer and explain rings around you without breaking a sweat. I've talked with Nelson Pass. You are no Nelson Pass.
@@scottlowell493There are no audible differences between solid-state amps, providing they are functioning within normal parameters. You can look up blind test studies throughout the decades and you'll find none that could differentiate between them.
@@scottlowell493If these voicings were meant to be in there, music producers would put them there.
@@scottlowell493cope hard
You forgot to mention yourself
nah
@@sharuraudio nah your mom?
I agree, this channel is awful. Sharur is useless.
@@nespressomanYes, he thinks all headphones are garbage expect for Audeze LCD-5
Here's the thing though about your assessment of measurement. Everything you mention and the reason why these reviewers are bad seems to be based around the fact that they don't care about measurements or they endorse products that don't measure well. Well I'm of the opinion that measurements can tell us something about a product and can be useful as a guide for purchasing but at the same time except for speakers measurements can't really tell us how a product sounds. And I believe relying on measurements tell you how a product sounds it's just as bad or even worse than convincing yourself through faiths and bias that something" sounds" a particular way.
And the majority of the products that I've reviewed or enjoy listening to, probably measure badly, does that mean my opinion about that thing is invalid?
I think at the end of the day what we are doing besides the act of listening to products and ultimately reviewing them, really is grounded in this aspect of subjectivity. And it's for that reason the majority of my reviews when it comes to products, although here lately I've been doing more album reviews, is rooted in the idea that " hey I liked this, but you might not".
Anyway bud this is my first time watching your videos and I have to say I like the tone and I've watched a few others too, so keep it up.
My only critique would be is it seems like the majority of your videos or let's say quite a bit of them, seem to be focused around the idea of hating on other people for their opinion or their opinion of you or how you guys differed in a conversation. I watch UA-cam reviewers because I enjoy watching them and the content they create. And I know I don't just speak for myself when I say that it gets old pretty fast watching reviewers just diss other people as a form of content.
The only other critique that I could truly make is maybe you have a bit too much confidence in yourself. Not don't take that the wrong way but I've always been very leery of people as soon as they say that they know the ultimate truth or they know the real answers or anything like that.
not reading
@@sharuraudioballs
Have you ever came across UA-cam channel "Sharur" He lists at Z tier.
I'm S tier
@@sharuraudio lol
Hate hate hate hate hate, welcome to the annual player haters ball, hate hate hate hate hate
Waterboarding was once considered to be the best way to force information from captives but governments have learned that being forced to sit through PassionforSound videos is far more effective.
Joshua Valour is great example of Dunning-Kruger effect; he knows some basic things about audio, but with more complicated things fails horribly.
You should also mention Darko Audio, but I think you could easily make another Top 5 Worst Audio Reviewers xd
yeah i could
@@default8973 It's perfect example, of what I imagine, when I hear term "Audiophile"
A long time ago, I wrote Mr. Valour a comment about appearing to be the epitome of Dunning-Kruger and it was great because it seemed to really tick him off and he sent me a "how dare you" reply. It was hilarious.
wait is this the guy who tried to review an IEM by looking at the FR graph?
Why limit it to 5.. there are so many contenders.... make a top 10
yes but no
The Honest Audiophile? His outer ears (capture devices) are so mishaped, that frequencies entering the ear canal? Would be wildly skewed. Passion thinks he's somehow being thorough, just because of the continual repeat, continual repeat .. con.. Joshua? Cares about the opening glamour shots of gear. No other substance is evident. The Cheap Audio Man is another eegit!!
lol
When joshua valor first started I made a negative comment on one of his videos. and he called me an ahole lol. I already knew from that time he was gonna be a schill reviewer
rip
Joshua just wants views and subscribers. When Cyberpunk 2077 was about to drop he actually made a video titled something along the lines of, "The best headphones to use for playing Cyberpunk 2077." I commented that he was pathetic and also told him I was showing myself the door. Never went back. Plus, he doesn't know what he's talking about...so there's that.
It's a bad sign when a reviewer spends more time on their beard than learning about audio. I would trust a reviewer that looks like a bum over a slick rick salesman glossy beard type. All the greatest minds look like bums with crazy hair like Doc Brown.
Why did he call you an ahole ? That guy dislike me as well.
just subscribed to all of them thanks!
ok noob
@@sharuraudio noob your dad? Stop mocking anyone on this!!
I know this video is 8 months old but I have to point out that I have rarely heard anyone exhibit such an extraordinary lack of self awareness. Perhaps one day you will grow up a bit and then have something worthwhile to say. I hope so for all our sakes.
jim farrell 4635
I love these videos tbh. Sharur is like 50 cent when he was dissing every1 for no reason early on in his career
lol
Haha he's too real he's gonna have to move to rumble cause UA-cam coming for him
Zreviews is probably the man who has influenced the most amount of people to buy really bad and stupid stuff on a constant basis. Whenever he does a new review and praises something (which is all the time)
I confronted him in the comments why he doesnt simply just rec one heaphone that is a cut above the rest and he literally said " its better to have 100 flavours than 1 "
lol
saw someone leave a similar comment and he removed it.
Yeah, I was about to say this. I don't wan to be rude, but I think he's mentally compromised. He's literally a seller. He gets paid for the stuff he pushes on people. How is somebody like that still called a reviewer? I know there are other people, you can call this, like Crin, but they are more honest and have dignity. Z reviews on the other hand can is aggressive about it. He'll argue that he's unbiased, because he gets paid for selling gear and try to tear apart any rational criticism of him.
he tried to say that the JBL studio 530 are "The best". Best at what? Sounding boxy and colored?
Sooooooo what you're telling me is I made a mistake buying the Violectric V590 in order to get the most out of my SHP9500?
They lied to me!
yes
Watched it, didn’t see me. But now I’m genuinely curious what Sharur would tier rank us all at and why.
I gotta be C tier or worse. And I wouldn’t even disagree. Sharur’s perspective on my demos is true, from one vantage point on what reviews should be like anyway.
Though, I see myself as a SS tier review god regardless. If I hear anything else I’ll ignore it.
my next video will be on the top 5 best reviewers and you will be mentioned in a way you may or may not expect
@@sharuraudio say whaat 🤯
@@dansaudioreviews Dan, I find your iems' sound demos useful enough. I don't judge their accuracy - at least we can have an idea how they really sound. For the rest it's your taste, it's your ears and I can't care less. As to Sharur - sometimes he's right, sometimes he's funny and I can clearly see where and when.
your sound demos are very good, the reason I subbed...
@@sergiymarchenko1002 ditto
Seems like if Crin or HBB says it's so then every other reviewer just nods and copy pastes the opinion.
i guess
HBB is a deaf prick as well as Crin. Crin's graphs are sci-fiction.
A definite honorable mention, sharur
I don't mind listening to the honest audiophile Dave.....it drives me nuts to watch him Jingle and wave the Iem's in front of the camera, like he's trying to sell them to me like they do in a Morocco Bazaar or something.
i mind
@@sharuraudio he sound humble....I don't know about honest ....ha
I understand the fact that you realize you were wrong and learn from it, but I still can't understand how a channel that propagated that the ER2SE was the best headphone in the world, now considers it just ok, worse than others who said they were bad. To find something good and the next week "yeah I was wrong, this sucks", how to trust a reviewer like that?
I explained why the er2se is bad
Because he reads graphs, research papers and then forgets what he has heard till now, only to form a new opinion about the same gear.
He is still learning and it seems that he discovered Audiosciencereview recently and have been echoing things he reads there, sometimes not quite fully understanding whatever he just learned. He is probably still very young and has not developed the virtue of avoiding being ridiculed.
@@sharuraudio Can you explain why you are obtuse?
You actually @'d them in the description 💀 I'm dead
Of coarse
The content the audio community needs
true
its poison and lies, and what community are you talking about ? did you get a membership card ? do you think you and me are part of some group ?
Oooh you’re my hero. Sharur, gobble gobble lemme have your seed.
Sharur is afraid of MD Jacques, btw I didn't watch this video yet, I'm in a recliner eating chips and will soon shower and turn on my humidifier in my bedroom and bust then get up to clean off and then go to bed, maybe I'll watch this tomorrow if you ask
lol ok
i do watch md jacques and her clones(i mean other channel that got similiar dubbing style) lol
@@stevenshaun6149 "her"
bruh i just checked out the channel. When I do a best reviewers video, I will include them. Their T2 DLC video is really good.
@@AlexB-dl5ou 🤔.................. (i hate where this is going🤣)
Watched the vid now, pretty good but they do add important opinions in this space. Its a shame that most of the well known reviewers just copy paste the same things down to exact nouns in their reviews. Er2se still mogs every iem while running a lawnmower or weedwhacker
no
I really like No themes reviews style , truth speaker. Anyway I like people who has the balls to call out others , the truth is if they was on the list they should take a look at how they are doing it maybe the can improve . We all have a right to judge , that statement you shouldn't judge is taking wrong , we judge daily and judge the type of girl we want. So Bravo I gave dumbs up.
he sucks
@Sharur1 I like to know why he suck ? He has an original style doing reviews , his breakdown and calling out bs from companies proves he's not being bought by them , I can't say that for none of the many reviewers .
What do you think of GoldenSound's MQA controversy series? I think it was good, but a bit too alarmist, though it is a big egg on Tidal's face for making false promises.
don't really care
Exactly. There are few reviewers out there who can say they have confronted some of the industry on their marketing bullshit and had a genuine effect. And they did it using the scientific method and not just flinging abuse around. If you were in any way objective, Sharur, you would give credit for that, but unfortunately your vast yet pitiful ego won't allow it.
I really need to stop this troll feeding and accept the fact that we all talk shit when young, but, boy, you annoy me.
@@sharuraudiocock
sharur is here to pick us up (we are the little cupcakes)
yes
EDP has entered the chat
everything is better than pseudo science without listening.
noob
I do think there is a bit of stupidity, but in the end, this is how they make their living. If they go around saying, yeah this shit sounds the same, no one is going to sponsor them. We call this financial freedom but moral bankruptcy.
sad
Sharur hear to speak the facts that everybody should hear!
of course!
The problem is living in a small town I have no access to these things without ordering then in . I have to trust their judgment even though I suspect I’m being shilled
And your trust this prick who puts every last opinion in graphs and “reviews” gear of graphs alone. Jesus Christ on a bike.
Best audio reviewers next?
yes
I'm in my '50s. I'm lucky to have good hearing for my age. Most people in their '50s hear somewhere around 30Hz to 12Khz. Lucky for me, I hear beyond that. Not 20Hz to 20Khz! NO! I'm not spending $50K on speakers. I won't spend $30K on a amp. How much money does one need to spend on audio hardware just to listen to music (or other)? It's money you can spend on travel, living, enjoying life, and many other things. Nothing wrong with good things in life...but...at one point it's all about the $$$.
They're not audio engineers, nor are they university graduates in physics studies in sound. They're on UA-cam to make money. Plus, how much money does one need to spend to hear "good" sound? You don't need to spend $100K to get good sound. If you want precise sound, like that needed in a laboratory or recording studio, that's a different scenario.
Classic sharu content. Never gets old
yes
You can add Andrew Robinson, Darko Audio, and Zero Fidelity to the list.
And yourself lol.
ur not a harman trained listener like me
@@sharuraudio Did you like your own comment? LOL
This is probably the worst review I've ever watched.
cope
Quarks dsp review coming?
yeah, I'll have it soon
what u think bout super review
bad
I love how you mock them this still doesn't take the joy I get and The entertainment I get out of watching them
noob
True.
This goldensound never mentioned Symphonium Helios has the worst fitting
true
@@sharuraudio everyone is complaining the fitting of this IEM, 4BA asking for USD850
Don't throw rocks at glass houses.
Tone Deaf Monk should replace Honest Audiophile on this list.
Can you pleas do a revised video?
I have to disagree on JayIyagi. Subjective opinions are ok. He does them better than the other 4 mentioned.
k
Jay? Better than Golden Sound? Jay can barely get through a review without saying "Nuanced", constantly repeats the same words/phrases... in the same sentence(!)and loves to remind you that he worked in a High-End store.
@@tabl10s I cant speak to Golden Sound. I don't think he's the best but not the worst.
I honestly want whatever you're smoking 😂 ( I love me a good roast, but you're painting a misleading picture of youtubers who make "free content")
When you have no-credibility on a topic like speakers.... you're just asking to be roasted yourself.
Otherwise good luck with the channel it's cool to have differing opinions I guess. 🤪
nope
incredible video u has inspire me to buy pyle amplifier and rockville mega base speakers to not listen to these audio pheliacs W job
lol
Hello sharur, just ran into this travesty and decided to give it a watch, it will be my last.
What is the number 1 worst ?
someone on this list
@@sharuraudio Which is who ?
Classic Sharur trolling while doing good killing the snake oil in this overly subjective hobby. As always, thanks for the vid (wish it would be in more detail though).
yes
Why is your new pfp some random black guy ?
lol
Is it accurate to call bottom top and vice versa
what
@@sharuraudio Is it good to use word top in relation to a pissbottom?
This guy is spot on.
These mofo reviewers just sit and talks but never actual play demo to backup their claim. Well, except for golden sound but most of his details analysis seem doesnt match what i heard. The Jay kid seem to only reviews stuff that only 1% people can afford and probably no one can tell if his review are correct because it out of 99% of population reach. I stop watching thses mofo nonesense talk and just go by the graph.
Forget knowledge for a moment and let's discuss credibility. I'm not a youtuber. If a company like Hifiman or Focal or whatever sends you a free headphone to review and of course you say "it has no impact on my review" then cut the product to shreds...will that company ever send you anything ever again? I don't think so. You ever heard of Olav's Gadgets? This guy calls most audio equipment junk. So what's his angle? Is he honest or is he selling his own product? My point is....how the hell do any of us trust any of you at all? Someone always seems to be selling something. I'd like to just have a reviewer simply say "sure, this is a new headphone but you don't need it. It's just another version of the 1000 other headphones out there", etc.... Sorry, i went on a rant.
i'm not selling anything
Arrogant -- for someone with 5K subscribers after 2 years?
noob
look at how many subs you have
You definitely forgot "pursuit of perfect sound". This guy is just dribble at its best, AND its sometimes takes for videos to show case a review. ( more clicks I suppose) yep definately the top 3 worst reviewers. And judging on how his system is set up, I dont think he knows much at all. Anyway probably a nice bloke though
nice
I’m curious, who would you pick as top reviewers?
myself
@@sharuraudio what have you reviewed?
@@BillyKueekSG everything
@@sharuraudio which dacs, amps, etc? I don’t see many reviews except many negative comments.
"Honest" is the worst in my book for his passive agressive pissiness. Needs a personality upgrade.
yes
No Shilleos? Disappointed bro.
nah he has some ok videos
What do you think of Z reviews? Ive heard very mixed opinions about him. All I really know is he recommended Grado SR60X and I wasn't a fan. (My $20 IEMs and $40 Koss KSC35 wireless sounded better imo, but then again I am a far cry from an audiophile) I am still a pretty big noob when it comes to this hobby so I can't tell if he is legit or not.
He knows some stuff but he's also a self admitted shill. He's mostly good for entertainment and seeing another perspective on a product.
The Grado SR60 sounds weird with everything except for 90s grunge rock. You're not alone.
Bro u legit forgot Zeos and Bag Guy Good Audio😂
bad guy is notably better than these guys. Z has a couple good videos
@@sharuraudio u have examples of Z good videos? Ive been a sub for a good while and its just him blabbering nonesense lol.
@@holiboin8108 his holo may one
Bad Guy punches walls in his spare time, does great audio reviews
Thanks!
Thanks!
@@sharuraudio Thank you. You saved me quite a bit of money. Greetings from Israel!
I should be in this list
shameless promotion
Where's SuperReviews? 🤣
he's pretty bad but idk if he's this bad
Just putting up graphs of specs and statistics say nothing about how humans hear, the interaction with the room, electronics and eq. One of the best measured loudspeakers of all times, vandersteen 2ce (late Audio engineer/watchdog Richard Hardesty). Given that, they should be perfect speakers for everyone right? Not everyone loves soft and laid back. The measurements don't show that. Wilson watt puppy 5: measured horribly, but blew away critics and fans. From what I have seen of your channel, it's like an incomplete equation. it's like you are attempting to reach people via attempting to divide by zero.
Hold the phone dude... I NEED popcorn for this one. Okay I'M RDY, LETS GO!!!!
nice
Are you a ASR disciple?
I finally someone speaking about this, all of them are really doesn't know anything and they are elitists. Subscribed!
true
Thoughts on el jefe reviews?
shill
@@sharuraudio why?
Awesome content, would be awesome if you add more stuff to your description like honest audiophile video you cited on this video
thanks
Lachlan deserves a special mention
true
Actually I don't mind Passion for Sound. But other jerks mentioned especially Joshua, Dishonest Audiophile and GoldenSound are the crappiest crap. I would add Bad Guy Deaf Ears and Zeos for sure.
@@sergiymarchenko1002 Bad guy atleast has some substance though. For eg. his conclusion about how bass guitars don't sound correct on Harman bass shelf is spot on.
@@r91playsind that deaf prick costed me a big chunk of waisted money in the very beginning of my hobby so...I dunno what you're talking about. NEVER AGAIN.
@@r91playsind with his ears (and overall taste) he has to cut woods in the forest...
How did Zeos not make this list
he has 1 or 2 decent videos
reviewer =/= salesman
Yeah I expected Z in top 5. At first I took him sort of seriously while my gut telling me he is lying or making stuff up most of the times. Now I get it, he is mostly pretending to understand everything he talks about.
He has so many stuffs, I doubt he knows everything
@@sharuraudio which ones?
add jays audio lab to that. Absolutely a waste of time......
About GoldenSound: what about his alleged work demonstrating MQA technology is a fraud to the degree he made the company that promotes MQA to change the way it describes MQA?
his mqa claims were never verifiable by third parties
If were not verified by 3rd parties, how come the company risked to change the description of its technology?
😂 Harman is accurate avarange sounding .
Epic video as always, keep up this quality content bro
ait
there isn’t someone more cringe than GoldenSound
true
he's like a mud volcano eruption - hardcore BS through and through...
REP SHARUR
what
@@sharuraudio yes
Nice clickbait video. Dude that was traumatizing, those arguments...
Jay's Iyagi is all visual style and editing while throwing in audiophile terms like 'nuance' and 'sibilance'. Pretentious but with flare and I can appreciate it on youtube because those more science based reviewers are so dull.
"..do it in an alpha manner like I did..." Aye son, on ye go, being "alpha". 😏
lol
Who are you to judge people.
the best
Finally some good quality content, big W.
yes
Is kiwi ears cadeza is garbage
prob
Dac/amp lovers F tier?
yes
a gay who thinks all dacs sounds the same shouldn't even be making audio videos.
noob
Coming in like edp445 with that cupcake line
who
Where did you demonstrate that bigger amp gives placebo about bass ?
Output impedance will change the FR of the HD650, wouldn't it ?
I hate Valour too btw.
bigger amp doesn't mean high output impedance
I don't use headphones
wheres the top 5 best?
based and grass-touching pilled
of course
"No scientific basis"..... but the channel goes to great lengths to drag massive speakers outside to test anechoic response.......... Be careful with your specious conclusions, it makes you look as bad as those that you criticise.
??
@sharuraudio The channel you were critical of, not you.
You just listed best content creators in this field. Everyone has their learning curve and they share their experiences with audio gear.
You need to list a guy like Ron from New Record Day who only praises about GR Research. All the biased reviewers(or content creators). You just try to put your name out there by trash talking other big names? You will pay for this big time. You don’t even have the creativity like the ones mentioned. You are making fool of yourself. Shame on you.
cope
GoldenSound should be banned from UA-cam, people like him ruin the headphone hobby.
very true
I absolutely agree.
His all contents are offend
whose
Yours...but i like how freestyle you are
I'm a Studer. Studer audio.
what
The name is just an old relic from audio history. I don't earn royalties, lol
Studer last mame pretty huge in music industry, though. Beatles white album was recorded on Studer gear. Dre used Studer gear. Cheryl Studer is an opera singer. Harmon kardon bought the Studer name out years back now though. So whoever owns HK now owns Studer brand, but nothing is ever produced under it anymore.
Top 5 best audio reviewer?
that video was posted after
You’re at the top of this list! Worst review channel ever!
copium