The genuine appearance and essence of Chingiz Khan and some important and unknown facts from the real History of Tatars and many Turkic peoples and Russians: Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist Dr. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’. And this is absolutely true. But first of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists. However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia: According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chingiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chingiz Khan and his own people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ - so wrote an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev (19th century), who spoke Chinese, Manchu and Khalkha-Mongolian languages and translated little-known ancient eastern sources. But these works of Vasiliev have been hidden from us. The conclusions of Vasiliev about Tatars History are confirmed also by other many little known data. So in fact Chingiz Khan had belonged to the medieval Tatars and was the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples. About the real faith of Chingiz Khan and his own people: for example, the Turkish traveler and historian Chelebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): ‘It is proved that Chingiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)’. Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from the general public. It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture'). But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu... So that the Tatars of Chingiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others nations. And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations... About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, detailed and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yeniky, translated in Engilsh. His books present a new, or rather, ‘well-forgotten old’ view on the real history of Tatars and many other Turkic peoples. There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chingiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait. In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chingiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chingiz Khan: ‘My son Chingiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chingiz Khan...’. And here's another interesting thing: We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’. But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after. This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Chingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources. This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
the amount of cope in this comment bro, genghis khan did not look like that lmao. There's an overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest genghis khan was phenotypically northeast asian. No amount of whitewashing (or in this case, indo-europeanizing) your own history will make you white. have a little freaking pride in your background, goddamn.
!["In Praise of Genghis Khan" - Mongolian Traditional Song [Slow + Reverb]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/vwznm-sLaCI/mqdefault.jpg)
!["In Praise of Genghis Khan" - Mongolian Traditional Song [Slow + Reverb]](/img/tr.png)
The genuine appearance and essence of Chingiz Khan and some important and unknown facts from the real History of Tatars and many Turkic peoples and Russians:
Perhaps you know, that an outstanding historian-scientist Dr. Iskhakov wrote: ‘the true history of the Tatars, of the people in every respect historical, is not written yet’. And this is absolutely true.
But first of all it must be said, that in official history there are many falsifications and slanders about the ‘Tatars - wild nomads’ etc., which were written by pro-Chinese, Persian, also both Russian tsars Romanovs and Bolshevik ideologists.
However primarily we should know the truth about the meaning of the names ‘Mongol’ and ‘Tatar’ (‘Tartar’) in the medieval Eurasia:
According to many medieval sources, the name ‘Mongol’ until the 17th-18th centuries meant belonging to a political community, and was not the ethnic name. While ‘‘the name ‘Tatar’ was ‘the name of the own ethnos (nation) of Chingiz Khan'. Also ‘…Chingiz Khan and his own people did not speak the language, which we now call the ‘Mongolian’…’’ - so wrote an academician-orientalist V.P.Vasiliev (19th century), who spoke Chinese, Manchu and Khalkha-Mongolian languages and translated little-known ancient eastern sources. But these works of Vasiliev have been hidden from us.
The conclusions of Vasiliev about Tatars History are confirmed also by other many little known data. So in fact Chingiz Khan had belonged to the medieval Tatars and was the outstanding and progressive leader of the Turkic peoples.
About the real faith of Chingiz Khan and his own people: for example, the Turkish traveler and historian Chelebi (17th century) wrote the following from the words of Tatar alims (scientists): ‘It is proved that Chingiz Khan was a Muslim, and the Tatars professed Islam already during the life of the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon Him)’.
Also, as Tatar alims told Chelebi, Chingiz Khan had been buried in the Volga region, not far from the city of Astrakhan. Moreover, there is a lot of data about this, hidden from the general public.
It is worth saying that according to many little-known data, the ancient and medieval Tatars were a very developed people both in spiritual and material aspects. It was the medieval Tatars who created the first Constitution of Eurasia, which was called in Tatar ‘Great Yasu’ (‘Yasu’ in Tatar means 'Scripture').
But with time many of their descendants became spiritually disabled and forgot invaluable doctrine and covenants of the creators of Great Yasu...
So that the Tatars of Chingiz Khan - medieval Tatars - were one of the Turkic nations, whose descendants now live in many of the fraternal Turkic peoples of Eurasia - among Tatars, Kazakhs, Bashkirs, Uighurs, and many others nations.
And few people know that the ethnos of medieval Tatars, which stopped the expansion of the Persians and the Chinese to the West of the World in Medieval centuries, is still alive. Despite to the politicians of the tsars Romanovs tsars and Bolsheviks dictators, which had divided and scattered this ethnos to different nations...
About everything above mentioned and a lot of the true history of Tatars and other fraternal Turkic peoples, that was hidden from us, had been written, detailed and proved, in the book ‘Forgotten Heritage of Tatars’ - it is one of books by an independent historian Gali Yeniky, translated in Engilsh. His books present a new, or rather, ‘well-forgotten old’ view on the real history of Tatars and many other Turkic peoples.
There are a lot of previously little-known historical facts, as well as 16 maps and illustrations in this book. This e-book (in English language) you can easily find in the Internet here: www.kobo.com/ebook/forgotten-heritage-of-tatars-1 or here: payhip.com/b/Xujb
On the cover of this book you can see the true appearance of Chingiz Khan. It is his lifetime portrait.
In the ancient Tatar historical source ‘About the clan of Chingiz Khan’ its author gave the words of the mother of Chingiz Khan: ‘My son Chingiz looks like this: he has a golden bushy beard, he wears a white fur coat and rides on a white horse’. As we can see, the portrait of an unknown medieval artist in many ways corresponds to the words of the mother of the Hero, which have come down to us in this ancient Tatar epic. Therefore, this portrait, which corresponds to the information of the Tatar source and to data from other sources, we believe, the most reliably transmits the appearance of Chingiz Khan...’.
And here's another interesting thing:
We can't keep silent that some 'very important' official historians try to retell the content (or rather, the concept) of the works of the independent historian Gali Yenikey (Yenikeev). But they conceal where the information was by them taken from. However it turned out they were unsuccessful and confused - this official historians, apparently, do not dare to show the real history of Tatars, being afraid of their ‘scientific chiefs’.
But not only this - see the portrait of Chingiz Khan - see on the 7th minute of the video of the Institute of history of the Academy of Sciences of Tatarstan (Russia): ua-cam.com/video/3WqB71gs5bc/v-deo.html - also this portrait is shown there both before and after.
This portrait is reconstruction, which made by Yenikeev on the basis of a lifetime portrait of Chingiz Khan and of information from the medieval Tatar Dastan (epic) 'About the Origin of Chingiz Khan', as well as from other historical sources.
This portrait was used by authors of the video without Yenikeev's permission and without telling where the portrait came from. This portrait is published on the cover of G. R. Yenikeev's book ‘Forgotten heritage of Tatars’: see: payhip.com/b/Xujb
For the first time this portrait was published on the cover of the third book by G. R. Yenikeiev ‘In the footsteps of the black legend’ (published in 2009), see its electronic version: payhip.com/b/DNdC
This ‘creativity’ of the official historians is called among the decent people as plagiarism - that is, as theft.
the amount of cope in this comment
bro, genghis khan did not look like that lmao. There's an overwhelming amount of evidence to suggest genghis khan was phenotypically northeast asian. No amount of whitewashing (or in this case, indo-europeanizing) your own history will make you white. have a little freaking pride in your background, goddamn.
çok güzel.
Eywollah
Keep it up i like it 🔥🔥🔥
Mükemmel
Damn that was seriously good. Have heard the normal speed version but didnt know that this slowed version existed
Hungary: we're europeans!
Also Hungary:
Atam 🤘🐺🥺
Çok iyi be
Eyw
@@ChanyuKun biri drill yapmış Cengiz Han'ımıza
@@ChanyuKun Kağanımızın laneti üzerimize olucak
@@northrim1877 bir bakayım beğim
sunay arkaplan müziğini ayarlarsan ben söylerim tümünü
Arkaplanı da attım ama hala yok?
Me when no ransacking villages:
"Oh! You play Minecraft too?"
"Minecraft?"
What a mutant voice 💀💀
لحمد الله على نعمة الاسلام أننا تحدنا دمرنا امبراطورية شر هذه ❤☝️
I EAT THE ALLAH
JESUS IS THE ONLY WAY, TRUTH AND LIFE TO YAHWEH
Çingiz
Genghis khan war Mongolia empire