@@bryanneal939 I believe Catherine and Anne were the luckiest. Maybe Anne because she never had sex with him. At that time he already ill and obese. Catherine got the prime Henry.
Well Dr Guillotin hadn't invented his version yet but the Halifax Gibbet existed and Scotland was only a few decades away from introducing the Maiden. Both were basically guillotines.
So unfair. He only beheaded two. He divorced two. One just died and the last one survived him. (In order: divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived). 😊
@@user-wu7ug4ly3vHe threatened all of them with death, though. And, had Jane Seymore lived, he would've killed her, and had he lived he would've killed Catherine Parr. Though he threatened to kill the other two, the only reason he divorced them instead is because they were foreign princesses with strong political alliances. It would've been WWI had he killed them So, the only rhings that prevented Henry from murdering people was fear and death itself.
I'll step in here just another minute and say that ALL of the Troup are wonderful , but sometimes one or two shine. In this case, our friends from the Great South are sparking like stars above the crown of Elessar.
Facts: Henry's daughter Mary, who became, technically, the first (cough *third* cough) queen of England became known as "Bloody Mary" for executing roughly 300 Protestant dissenters. Yet, her father Henry executed over 70,000 dissenters, plus two of his wives (though he threatened all of them with execution). We all know he killed his second and fouth wives, Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard (who were cousins, btw). He couldn't execute the foreign wives for their powerful political alliances, so he kept it to his English wives with no protection. He was going to kill Jane, but she died in childbirth before he could follow through on his threats. Had she lived, he definitely would've killed her. And he was going to execute his sixth and final wife, Catherine Parr, but he changed his mind last minute then died shortly after. Had he lived, he definitely would've killed her. Anyway, isn't it ironic that history has labeled Mary, a woman, as 'bloody', when her dad was King Henry the frickin' eighth!
@@romainsavioz5466 Since, according the the writer above, Elizabeth killed 2k in 45 years, and Mary killed 300 in 5... if everything remained relative, she would've killed a mere 700 more than her sister in the same reigning period. 🤣 We can laugh about it now, but boy I'm glad to be alive be now and not then!
@@rachelcookie321 I don't think he was capable of loving anyone. When she was giving birth to Edward the 12th of October, Henry was 100 miles away having an affair. There was also religious upheaval, confusson and uproar, and the Anglican Church was trying to get their footing. They wrote a book called The Bishops' Book in an attempt to address and calm the issues. Henry was supposed to read and approve the new book by September, in the "good hope of furthering the cause of the gospel in England." -Stratsburg October 24th, 1537, but the king hadn't even so much as touched the book in October, because he had better things to "do." Plus, there was a dude named Reginald Pole travelling from Rome to gather an army against the King while on his way to Lions, and Henry needed the support of his people for soldiers. But he didn't care to invest himself in the spiritual turmoil he threw his country into over his sins and crimes against his wives. He didn't care that an army was coming and he needed to sign off on this book so the people would support him which would recruit more needed soldiers. He just wanted fresh behind. (By the way, the army never came. It was stopped by the French King, Francois I, who had previously signed a treaty with Henry a year earlier, that Henry wasn't sure the French king would uphold.) I know the history books say he wanted a son so bad for his kingdom and to perpetuate the Tudor name, but his actions say he didn't care for any of those thing.
Only two of his wives were beheaded and it would have been considered shameful to not have a son so not entirely surprising he remarried at first (after that it got ridiculous)
@@romainsavioz5466 the guy has an incredible long list of people he ordered killed. Outside of the two wives he essentially murdered along with some of their relatives.
They cut out the part where they start singing about how no one is actually dead, so does that mean everyone actually died?! I love writing strange comments.😅
@@StudioCtvDespite the fact only two of his wives were beheaded and guillotines weren't invented until hundreds of years later? That makes sense!😅 (Anyway, I think the inaccuracies make it even funnier)
Divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived..
Not sure who was the luckiest of them.
I'm Henry VIII and I've had six sorry Wives. Some will say I ruined their lives!
@@bryanneal939 I believe Catherine and Anne were the luckiest. Maybe Anne because she never had sex with him. At that time he already ill and obese. Catherine got the prime Henry.
@@PulseXP-yo8wu Catherine of Aragon was one.
She failed to give me a son.
I had to ask her for a divorce..
that broke her poor heart, of course.
best and worst poem ever.
Honestly it’s crazy how the rest of the nobles were just like “My daughter is next.”
Probably not much of a NO you could utter if you wanted to keep your head on.
Whoever wrote this one: you deserve a raise!
we'll let Dalton know
@@StudioCtv and what happened?
Mate it's simple af, everyone knows about Henry, 10yo know so could come up with this
@@yunemmuhe didn't get the raise
The King has superpower: The stare of the guillotine
Surprised I’m not seeing more SIX references! 😂
That was before the guillotine's time. Nah , it was good old fashioned axes except for Anne Boleyn. She got the sword.
Well Dr Guillotin hadn't invented his version yet but the Halifax Gibbet existed and Scotland was only a few decades away from introducing the Maiden. Both were basically guillotines.
More Tudor Court humor, please please please!!!
This is absolutely brilliant! I've watched it about 20 times 😂😂😂😂
Best in a while. Props to whoever came up with it.
that would be none other than Dalton, the King of King Henry sketches
@@StudioCtv And by props I meant the turkey leg.
so you want us to give Dalton a turkey leg...@@markuhler2664
@@StudioCtv if he doesn't want it, I'll take it. Mmmmm, turkey leg.
@@StudioCtv Dalton is a genius!!!! MORE TUDOR COURT HUMOR PLEASE!!!!!
That was more robespierre towards the end actu- *chop*
Is this The Newlywed Game or Chopped ? 😅
lol that's good
So unfair. He only beheaded two. He divorced two. One just died and the last one survived him. (In order: divorced, beheaded, died, divorced, beheaded, survived). 😊
@@user-wu7ug4ly3vWELCOMe to the show, to the histo remix
@@user-wu7ug4ly3vHe threatened all of them with death, though. And, had Jane Seymore lived, he would've killed her, and had he lived he would've killed Catherine Parr.
Though he threatened to kill the other two, the only reason he divorced them instead is because they were foreign princesses with strong political alliances. It would've been WWI had he killed them
So, the only rhings that prevented Henry from murdering people was fear and death itself.
@@grace52775They’re just making a niche musical reference. I don’t think you’re meant to take it literally
First love it!!!❤❤❤
“This guy keeps changing wife’s” haha
Carol: Guillotines weren't even around during the Tudor Era!
Guillotines*
@@PancakeMafia gilly teenz
Party pooper. 💩
Henry: *Guillotine Stare*
Love the book on her head 😂😂😂
I saw that title and just 😆
Death stare😂
Jane lived!!!
🤣🤣🤣🤣 KH, the 8th was a serial killer
King Henry VIII🤣!
I'll step in here just another minute and say that ALL of the Troup are wonderful , but sometimes one or two shine. In this case, our friends from the Great South are sparking like stars above the crown of Elessar.
So apparently king Henry the 8th is a mutant who can create guillotine out of nothing
👏👏👏👏
Brilliant. 😂
Won by default.
Tori’s face 😂
The enemy stand user:
Actually funny
I actually met Bob eubanks once
Facts: Henry's daughter Mary, who became, technically, the first (cough *third* cough) queen of England became known as "Bloody Mary" for executing roughly 300 Protestant dissenters.
Yet, her father Henry executed over 70,000 dissenters, plus two of his wives (though he threatened all of them with execution). We all know he killed his second and fouth wives, Anne Boleyn and Catherine Howard (who were cousins, btw). He couldn't execute the foreign wives for their powerful political alliances, so he kept it to his English wives with no protection. He was going to kill Jane, but she died in childbirth before he could follow through on his threats. Had she lived, he definitely would've killed her. And he was going to execute his sixth and final wife, Catherine Parr, but he changed his mind last minute then died shortly after. Had he lived, he definitely would've killed her.
Anyway, isn't it ironic that history has labeled Mary, a woman, as 'bloody', when her dad was King Henry the frickin' eighth!
Elizabeth 1 killed at least 2k as well
And elisabeth also executed a lot just in a longer time frame then her half-sister
@@romainsavioz5466 Since, according the the writer above, Elizabeth killed 2k in 45 years, and Mary killed 300 in 5... if everything remained relative, she would've killed a mere 700 more than her sister in the same reigning period. 🤣
We can laugh about it now, but boy I'm glad to be alive be now and not then!
Didn’t Henry love Jane though? Especially since she gave him a son.
@@rachelcookie321 I don't think he was capable of loving anyone. When she was giving birth to Edward the 12th of October, Henry was 100 miles away having an affair.
There was also religious upheaval, confusson and uproar, and the Anglican Church was trying to get their footing. They wrote a book called The Bishops' Book in an attempt to address and calm the issues. Henry was supposed to read and approve the new book by September, in the "good hope of furthering the cause of the gospel in England." -Stratsburg October 24th, 1537, but the king hadn't even so much as touched the book in October, because he had better things to "do."
Plus, there was a dude named Reginald Pole travelling from Rome to gather an army against the King while on his way to Lions, and Henry needed the support of his people for soldiers. But he didn't care to invest himself in the spiritual turmoil he threw his country into over his sins and crimes against his wives. He didn't care that an army was coming and he needed to sign off on this book so the people would support him which would recruit more needed soldiers. He just wanted fresh behind. (By the way, the army never came. It was stopped by the French King, Francois I, who had previously signed a treaty with Henry a year earlier, that Henry wasn't sure the French king would uphold.)
I know the history books say he wanted a son so bad for his kingdom and to perpetuate the Tudor name, but his actions say he didn't care for any of those thing.
Only two of his wives were beheaded and it would have been considered shameful to not have a son so not entirely surprising he remarried at first (after that it got ridiculous)
It doesn't say Studio C but they might be underground now.
10/10
He actually just divorced Catherine of Aragon, same goes with Anne of Cleves but he did kill like 2 or 3 of his wives...
😂😂😂
I feel like this is going on in the Whitehouse right now. Or Georgia. OR new york...
King Henry was a serial killer
Not really if we are speaking about wifes
@@romainsavioz5466 the guy has an incredible long list of people he ordered killed. Outside of the two wives he essentially murdered along with some of their relatives.
@@romainsavioz5466 He personally signed off on the execution of 70k of his own subjects.
Ohh yeah, that’s the guy from not Cinderella’s type!
Ah, it's good to be king.
They cut out the part where they start singing about how no one is actually dead, so does that mean everyone actually died?!
I love writing strange comments.😅
yes. we wanted the short to be more historically accurate
@@StudioCtvDespite the fact only two of his wives were beheaded and guillotines weren't invented until hundreds of years later?
That makes sense!😅 (Anyway, I think the inaccuracies make it even funnier)
being studio c historically accurate isn't admittedly the most reliable
@@StudioCtv Wait, that doesn't include the Stick-fetching and Reflection-Man Guilds, right? Right?
*kronk voice* righhhht....@@josettejoy6003