No aesthetically meaningful public space has been created, let's say since Siena. You can call it "public space" as much as you like, backed by "recent studies", but that's just a label like the rest of urban design jargon.
Wauw, too many difficult, yet interesting, topics/words/definitions for me to understand the lecture. This to me is a typical scientist talking and not understanding her audience....or it’s just me not being intelligent enough.
No aesthetically meaningful public space has been created, let's say since Siena. You can call it "public space" as much as you like, backed by "recent studies", but that's just a label like the rest of urban design jargon.
Your Presentation Connects with Professional Environmental Studies work at Lehman. (CUNY-Herbet)
V. LeBlanc
Wauw, too many difficult, yet interesting, topics/words/definitions for me to understand the lecture. This to me is a typical scientist talking and not understanding her audience....or it’s just me not being intelligent enough.
It's a typical boring planner. They haven't made anything meaningful since the organic medieval public spaces.