New Inventions That Are On Another Level ▶4

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 27 вер 2019
  • If you are the author of the materials or the copyright owner of it, but your authorship was not indicated or you object to its use, please contact me: titosaleksyt@gmail.com
    Subscribe to my channel to get to know all news! ► / @innovativetechs3044
    Don’t miss next videos: Press the little bell ((🔔)) to get notifications

КОМЕНТАРІ • 446

  • @rachelthornton4161
    @rachelthornton4161 2 роки тому +9

    Sadly the Triton re-breather was a scam

  • @graywoulf
    @graywoulf 4 роки тому +3

    The edible/biodegradable food storage idea should win a Nobel Peace Prize for replacing the plastics we use today. I hope this goes global very soon and even mandatory globally as well. There needs to be a MASSIVE global cleanup of plastic waste RIGHT NOW!!!!!

    • @tullochgorum6323
      @tullochgorum6323 2 роки тому

      Really? Milk production is a cruel industry and produces strikingly high levels of CO2 - I don't think packaging based on milk is any kind of a way forwards. The US Department of Agriculture is in the pockets of industrial farming, which no doubt explains their priorities - which is to sell milk, I think, and not to save the world.

  • @ssa6227
    @ssa6227 4 роки тому +1

    I am glad people pointed out Triton as fraud.
    It's high time something is done about passenger aircraft safety. At least install parachutes on top so that at least high altitude crashes are not fatal.
    And install rubber air bags below in case of low level crash.

  • @maatheww4070
    @maatheww4070 4 роки тому +2

    The Tyre project and the plastic bag would be really environment friendly .

  • @cmdrw0lf708
    @cmdrw0lf708 4 роки тому +5

    I think the only one thats actually real is the biodegradable plastic
    I've made it it's basically just really dry cheese

  • @spacecadet35
    @spacecadet35 3 роки тому +1

    If you believe in teh Triton, I have a bridge to sell you. It is in Brooklyn.Basic physics just laughs at Triton.

  • @nadawaedirisinghe2973
    @nadawaedirisinghe2973 2 роки тому +1

    Last one is super 👍

  • @VerifyTheTruth
    @VerifyTheTruth 4 роки тому +2

    The breather and the airplane parachute definitely should.

    • @Sharpless2
      @Sharpless2 4 роки тому

      @@Magnet420 people still follow thunderfoot?
      my fucking god. I thought AvE was bad, changed my mind... But thunderfoot was, is, and will forever be an absolute piece of shit.

  • @Some-ci1uy
    @Some-ci1uy 3 роки тому +4

    0:16 rip to the pilots

  • @ckdigitaltheqof6th210
    @ckdigitaltheqof6th210 2 роки тому

    "Aircraft" is not an air craft type, but something EVERY mass passenger airline should've had.

  • @leeorshimhoni8949
    @leeorshimhoni8949 4 роки тому +3

    Edible packaging!
    Perfect for chocolate.
    How many times the aluminium packaging got stuck to the chocolate?

    • @wernerhiemer406
      @wernerhiemer406 3 роки тому

      Aluminium? I would be glad to have that still. I only get plastic packaging chocolate?

  • @alaingingras7224
    @alaingingras7224 3 роки тому +1

    The Triton is just a pair of BMX bike handles!

    • @JeanMarcWilvers
      @JeanMarcWilvers 3 роки тому

      The Triton doesn't existe more. It was o big fake. :-(

  • @joe13franco
    @joe13franco 4 роки тому +74

    You need to do your homework before you put products that don’t work on your videos.

    • @KrakkenXXX
      @KrakkenXXX 4 роки тому +1

      Jose Franco agreed

    • @jackcoyle7484
      @jackcoyle7484 4 роки тому

      Obviously they did their homework far more than you would know dipass, so one idea is wrong? Get over it and be happy that 99% of the video is dope af

    • @SeanStrife
      @SeanStrife 3 роки тому +3

      @@jackcoyle7484 Actually, that one product they listed calls into question the validity of everything else on the list so... fuck right off, shitgibbon.

  • @dennischiira6967
    @dennischiira6967 4 роки тому +2

    Great content, yes such concepts are possible to implement

  • @henryohenry1504
    @henryohenry1504 4 роки тому +1

    these ideas were getting funnier and funnier, I mean whom ever are thinking these ideas up should come up with a show that just has these and more bad ideas with graphic animations! I'd love it

    • @henryohenry1504
      @henryohenry1504 4 роки тому

      Also bring in "experts" people love that crap. Oh and testimonials!

  • @joshuamuller3734
    @joshuamuller3734 4 роки тому

    All of these were great. The last one is the future only in time

  • @pacificbowmen7384
    @pacificbowmen7384 4 роки тому +2

    it's a pity that B.S can't be used as a carbon neutral fuel.

  • @dustinfowler7868
    @dustinfowler7868 4 роки тому +8

    According to the comments,triton doesn't work.

    • @spaghettimonstersjudgingyo504
      @spaghettimonstersjudgingyo504 4 роки тому

      @@VaIhalIa "or my favorite, about 90% of everything that comes out of Elon Musk’s mouth"
      Glad to see I'm not alone in that sentiment.

  • @sarahwilliams6384
    @sarahwilliams6384 3 роки тому

    The planet needs more CO2 not less !

  • @frc5024
    @frc5024 2 роки тому

    Yes, Innovation to make life better for people, safer, cleaner environment, some innovation should come to life.

  • @jonnyangel1591
    @jonnyangel1591 4 роки тому +1

    Lots of good stuff here. The plane thing is a winner in my book

  • @edylcnostrebor9722
    @edylcnostrebor9722 3 роки тому +2

    Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us all together opening up

  • @MasterCougar
    @MasterCougar 4 роки тому +1

    I think the possibility of a cabin section disconnecting from the main body is something all aircraft designers would look at not only for the value but pure safety. While maybe cost prohibitive but I would pay extra to fly onboard this aircraft than any other, also with the types of material being used today and future materials coming forward would or could make it cost-effective and with the amounts of inspections being done now, this should be strongly looked at.

    • @ablemagawitch
      @ablemagawitch 4 роки тому

      They already have small plane (Cessna/Piper/Beech single/double engine sized) parachutes which are retrofits, due to the sheer cost of newly equipped aircraft costing so much more and it being luxury option like seat belts were once and upgrade.. They have been scaled up for large commercial aircraft, in theory for R&D and applied on larger spacecraft, so the application is there........ Which they're not a mandatory safety requirement in any country sadly,m hence you won't see them on planes. Aircraft crashes are so low they aren't a big issue on the radar. Even if it a 747 plane full of people's lives and that is lot more than Moral Panic laws of "If It Saves One Life...." crap they punished us with for losing freedoms... and forcing to buy safety gear that sounds good but the risk to use ratio is very low to offset the cost. Every industry and their insurance companies mandates has put a price on your life and that of others. Basically Making the cost needing to be financially worth it, to equip a fleet of aircraft verses the money lost to actual risks. The aircraft is an investment item by itself. Which how many of these parachutes does it cost to outfit the fleet and the maintenance to test/replace/recertify for life cycles? That is the sad way safety recalls work, if say a vehicle problem will lead to more costs in lawsuits for damages and punitive awards from hurting people, then they recall the safety hazard. So until that , they won't build in/retrofit the items into planes. Otherwise they let it hurt people until that factor comes into play...... Also commercial airliners fly at high enough speeds where even with a regular parachute the forces of the wind would rip a human a part trying to exit the plane. Skydiving planes go real slow and are almost at stall speeds when jumpers exit.
      Another scenario option
      A whole passenger plane with a top that came off by explosive bolts(that canopy clears before the ejection seat fires on the fighter aircraft) trigger by the captain/flight crew and then passengers having their seats fired up into the air(I assume you want en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ejection_seat#Zero-zero_ejection_seat options) and deploying a parachute automatically when clear would be astronomical, let alone the fact people would undo their flight safety restraints.
      The general public with ejection seats they control would be really really bad (tonight on the news, asshole gets pissed because air stewardess refuses to serve them more alcohol and pulled their ejection level decompressing the plane sucking 2 passengers out, drunken asshole was not strapped in and also fell to their death.... . Also not ejecting when you are tucked in and prepared is also bad. You can't get people to listen, practice and grab the flotation devices under their asses as seen in "Cactus 1549" proved ua-cam.com/video/XfH-H2nNzeE/v-deo.html aka "The Miracle on The Hudson"
      Sad fact, the reason they gave pilots parachutes was because the training involved in pilots to fly a plane was far more "expensive/valuable" than the aircraft itself. Trained pilots that could fly a mission, return to base and land where they could reuse the plane and runway became a commodity(due to pilot & bomber crew losses) that was a higher cost for more than an aircraft's time & cost to replace from assembly time to flight line. WW1 pilots took their own parachutes and the first aerial "dog Fights" were pilots shooting at each other with their personal weapons. The military figured out the value of guns and bombs on planes but was a bit slow on that one. The first "bombers" were pilots throwing out grenades out of their scouting planes. Kinda makes you proud of the human race ability to evolve huh?

    • @richigill6612
      @richigill6612 4 роки тому

      The air taxi of nuziland is a big acheavement,thanks to the engineer's,God bless you

  • @slappinpumpkins
    @slappinpumpkins 3 роки тому +3

    Cant wait until some innovative experts develop an air purifier that clean air for those of us that live near freeways

  • @adorable6385
    @adorable6385 4 роки тому +1

    Eating the plastic after being handled by God only knows how many hands is a coronavirus heaven.

  • @spacebasedsolarpowersbspsb6548
    @spacebasedsolarpowersbspsb6548 3 роки тому +1

    Tier is good option
    SeaBin is best option

  • @hugostiglitz6914
    @hugostiglitz6914 4 роки тому +3

    Firstly, the seabin can't distinguish between environmentally unfriendly items and things that float in the sea that should be there.
    The ejectable cabin aircraft is a non starter as well. Imagine the extra weight from having to design two independent primary structures?
    Also, whit if the problem is in the cabin area, like a depressurisation or cabin fire. Theres also the extra maintenance of the cabin release mechanism. It wouldn't be of any use in most accidents, like runway overshoot or flight into terrain. Just not feasible!

  • @elmeriseppinen
    @elmeriseppinen 4 роки тому +20

    Triton was debunked a long ago (check Thunderf00t)
    Cora will most likely fail due to weight limits. More power needs more battery which means more load which needs more power. Electric planes are suitable for short and frequent flights, such as pilot training, but that's crazy expensive for taxi service. Where would you land anyway, when most of your customers are in cities, not in large open fields.
    Seabin is a essentially a pump, bit of pipe and a net. The retail price for the parts is about $100-200 depending on how fancy system you want to make. It's not worth $3825. Just saying.
    Moss in the wheels is a concept, not an actual plan. You get much better results just by either driving a bit less (we are talking about 100m/day or less. Moss doesn't capture significant amounts of CO2 compared to other forms of biomass) or by planting 1 tree. Actually you get pretty much the same effect by having the same amount of moss anywhere.
    Aircraft parachute... Does one even have to explain why it won't work? As you are traveling 800-900 km/h any parachute will just break off. And the "prototype" had rocket boosters burning the fuselage at the end. I mean, it will burn you to death, fall on you and crush you to death... There are many, many reasons why that's only short animations and no actual footage, prototypes or 3D models.

    • @CreekyGuy
      @CreekyGuy 4 роки тому +1

      @elmeri seppinen - Your critique is spot-on, from what I read of it. I am unqualified to judge it in its entirety, since I stopped the video at 3:38. It seems my B.S. button wasn't designed for that level of (ab)use, and it broke at that point.

    • @DL-kc8fc
      @DL-kc8fc 4 роки тому +2

      It is so. Triton - scam (insufficient gas volume and insufficient pressure to overcome water pressure at shallow depth). Cora is heavily dependent on batteries ... The vision of small aircraft for everyone has existed since the 1960s, but even then there was a problem with safety, storage, etc. The current advertising is once again targeting families who go for picnics or work, but this is not massively real, as it was not real in the last century, when very small aircraft with reliable internal combustion engines existed. Rich people can fulfill this dream because the price and strict restrictions for others will keep enough space in the sky for the rich and for short taxis. Security will not allow public boom, as it did in the last century. Pump, moss ... I agree. Parachutes ... It certainly occurred to anyone interested in the safety of air traffic. I thought of it as a little boy when there was no internet, and so many other people. The problem is that it's very expensive and airlines want to make money. They have well calculated that after a plane crash, they pay much less than by investing in such a project. The destroyed machine is covered by insurance unless a direct pilot error is proven. That's why you never saw it in real life. High speed parachutes have existed for a long time and can be fired in the order of return of a spacecraft capsule - stabilizing, braking and normal. Saving lives is worth a few grazes. The last parachute can be a so-called "mattress" that can be steered and can slip easily into a convenient place. It is really just about money, and the airline applying it will get a large clientele that will not mind the more expensive ticket.

    • @andrewtaylor940
      @andrewtaylor940 4 роки тому +1

      Even Thunderfoot missed the most worryingly absurd claims of the Triton in his debunking. He never worked through just how much surface area the oxygen exchangers in the Triton would need to even begin to do what is claimed. (Here's a hint, the human or mammalian lung is the most efficient use of such a membrane surface area known to man. We have no way of mechanically replicating it. Yet these clowns are claiming they have devices a fraction the size of a single lung that will do just that. Yeah, no.

  • @danglinwang1857
    @danglinwang1857 3 роки тому

    Triton doesn't work yet. It would have to pump between 45 - 90 litres of water each minute through the device to provide enough oxygen for a human at rest

  • @morningrays9899
    @morningrays9899 4 роки тому +3

    The breather depending on its reliability.

  • @davidbeppler3032
    @davidbeppler3032 4 роки тому +1

    No mention of the teleportation backpack? Why not? The Triton made the list.

  • @francescozambuto1713
    @francescozambuto1713 4 роки тому +6

    Yes I believe that the ideas can be implemented for the good of our planet and for society.

  • @chideraanwosu1716
    @chideraanwosu1716 4 роки тому +1

    these inventions are all great

    • @SeanStrife
      @SeanStrife 3 роки тому

      Except Triton, which has been proven to be a fraud... and it calls into question the validity of everything else on the list.

  • @sureshshrestha4835
    @sureshshrestha4835 4 роки тому +1

    Yes it is possible but only if the politicians agree to it and don’t bring cost or lack of funds in the project

  • @5thhorseman559
    @5thhorseman559 4 роки тому +44

    Yep including Triton in this video shows all you do is recycle other people's videos without any research ...

  • @soulmate805
    @soulmate805 3 роки тому

    The safety capsule for the aircraft is smart, but what about the pilots

  • @jamesmccarthy4974
    @jamesmccarthy4974 2 роки тому

    That ocean trash collector could be downsized for a swimming pools for leaf collection and could be solar powered with panels gathering sunlight just below the surface.

  • @darquesand
    @darquesand 4 роки тому +4

    3:34 Is already proven to be a scam item.

  • @uzzie88
    @uzzie88 4 роки тому +10

    You should know that nearly every single thing in this video is a concept.

    • @eddyclaros9314
      @eddyclaros9314 4 роки тому +1

      uzzie88 possible concepts which is dope af

  • @WokeandProud
    @WokeandProud 3 роки тому +5

    Thunderfoot would like to know your location.

  • @Alexander-mk4qf
    @Alexander-mk4qf 4 роки тому +1

    i wish all planes was like concept

  • @bphoxay6440
    @bphoxay6440 4 роки тому +3

    I luv the last one.. you know the one collecting the trash from the water. That’s what’s up 😍#CleanPlanet

    • @piperman2890
      @piperman2890 4 роки тому

      Collect a lot of kelp and fish. You don't need a net anymore 🐟🐠🐡🦐

  • @nnknight05
    @nnknight05 4 роки тому +1

    Also the Goodyear tires . That’s is amazing and I could see us regaining our world back with an invention like that.

  • @mymind4u2hear
    @mymind4u2hear 4 роки тому +2

    9:15 the idea was already designed by Michael Guitouni from a different aspect but still parachute on each side helping to the plane to land safely, the idea was introduced on social media as an idea to Bombardier at the year 2018 ... Michael Guitouni designed a new way better to replace his old design ... they take the idea of others they arent honest to say where they took it from .

  • @angelafields3740
    @angelafields3740 4 роки тому

    guess Boeing needs to step it up and make planes like this,doubt they will ,saved to many lives!!

  • @GPatrick137
    @GPatrick137 3 роки тому

    yes yes yes !!!!!!!!!!! we need more of these

  • @MrGibbs-sb3rq
    @MrGibbs-sb3rq 4 роки тому +16

    when that first put part of the plane one happend I was like WHY WOULD YOU KILL ALL THOSE PEOPLE but then there where parachutes

    • @Buzzzy-bee
      @Buzzzy-bee 4 роки тому

      The Electrician but what about the pilot and copilot :/

    • @MrGibbs-sb3rq
      @MrGibbs-sb3rq 4 роки тому +1

      @@Buzzzy-bee That part was still flying

    • @LeonardIrimia
      @LeonardIrimia 4 роки тому +1

      What about the one fearing to be crushed by an airplane while he/she walks?

    • @MrGibbs-sb3rq
      @MrGibbs-sb3rq 4 роки тому

      @@LeonardIrimia Do you mean crushed?

    • @LeonardIrimia
      @LeonardIrimia 4 роки тому +1

      @@MrGibbs-sb3rq I do. Thank you for letting me notice the error! All the best! 🙂

  • @myotiswii
    @myotiswii 4 роки тому +1

    I feel like mossy wheels are also really stupid. A little moss literally does only minimal amounts of photosynthesis...

  • @MattJohnson2469
    @MattJohnson2469 4 роки тому

    'Aircraft' definitely has potential, but would require significant buy-in from the major manufacturers. The concept of a ballistic parachute is not new and neither is a removable tube design. Cirius has made single engine (propeller) planes with a parachute that has saved countless lives. As airplanes are only making money when their flying, many airlines are working with the manufacturers to see if a interchangeable cabin was feasible. Imagine boarding a clean cabin 10 mins before takeoff and as soon as the jet arrives the swap of cabins would take no longer than the refuel and ground tasks.

  • @mohsen.khadiv
    @mohsen.khadiv 4 роки тому +8

    8:55 will be great !

    • @kacper241
      @kacper241 4 роки тому +1

      mohsen khadiv what about captains and things below! Just let it land on a car in the street

    • @Albi91vl
      @Albi91vl 2 роки тому

      it is the most stupid thing ever called "invention". Planes are so safe that to implement a measure like that would be more dangerous than safe because like every new tech it will have its faulty parts and sometimes the parachute will not open, sometimes it will go off by itself in an not appropriate location and the plane will die also because of the lack of landing gear gone with the cabin. Go and watch videos of real professionals about what the mass people call inventions and look cool.

  • @nnknight05
    @nnknight05 4 роки тому

    The safety deployment of the the passengers from the plane is an awesome idea however they should try to figure out a way to add the inflatables in case they land in the water. Other than that, I love that idea

  • @juanr.santiago7595
    @juanr.santiago7595 4 роки тому

    I would love to see all the inventions of this video.

    • @SeanStrife
      @SeanStrife 3 роки тому

      Well... you won't see Triton; it's been proven to be a full-on scam.

  • @davidmccullough2466
    @davidmccullough2466 3 роки тому

    The re-breather and tires are cool

  • @markmark2222
    @markmark2222 4 роки тому +1

    I like safety airplane It's so good and is more safety for passenger Thanks for sharing it

    • @failproductionsdk
      @failproductionsdk 4 роки тому +1

      either wya, plane is literally the safest way to travel. Maybe spending time and money on inventing new secruity for cars (the most lethal from of transport) wouldve been far better imo.

  • @Novaximus
    @Novaximus 3 роки тому

    I think the triton owes Star Wars some royalities

  • @sumandash6428
    @sumandash6428 3 роки тому

    Excellent concepts. Loved project loon

  • @nichols746
    @nichols746 4 роки тому +1

    old stuff long ago they found out that underwater breathing thing didn't work as advertised,,

  • @paulstovall3777
    @paulstovall3777 3 роки тому

    Necessity is the mother of invention.

  • @ThaSound
    @ThaSound 3 роки тому

    Newtonian tech........OUTDATED!!!!!

  • @carlostizcareno8565
    @carlostizcareno8565 4 роки тому

    I think that the last 3/4 products should go on shark tank and get some funding,they are all very good ideas.

  • @barniecobb7669
    @barniecobb7669 4 роки тому

    yes, it would be really good for safety, comfort and environmentally freindly.

  • @SALZOPYRIN
    @SALZOPYRIN 4 роки тому +1

    Boeing 737 Max NEEDS THE SAFETY MODULE TO MANY PEOPLE HAVE DIED ALL PLAINS NEED TO HAVE THIS MODULE

  • @7fink7
    @7fink7 2 роки тому

    Triton is the thing I want 🤯👍

  • @doit9854
    @doit9854 4 роки тому +3

    Love it how the ripcord on a plane cabin leaves the pilot/co-pilot alone for their eventual demise. :p

    • @arlotarves3365
      @arlotarves3365 4 роки тому

      @DO IT right! i'd hate to be a pilot that sees a part of his aircraft fall out the back leaving him to his death

    • @cadavher
      @cadavher 4 роки тому

      I was first like "wow! That's a great idea!" Then immediately thought about the pilots and got sad lol

    • @richardjackson5025
      @richardjackson5025 4 роки тому

      Wouldn’t the pilots just go to capsule ? I mean knowing they are gonna crash they may as well? Shit I would

    • @doit9854
      @doit9854 4 роки тому

      @@richardjackson5025 You're presuming that an airline would pay for two extra seats for the pilots to use in the unlikely event of a passenger jettison. Cheaper to just pay the life insurance policy.

  • @MikevomMars
    @MikevomMars 3 роки тому +1

    When did we all actually get used to those PR videos in which perfectly made-up, well-dressed people smile as if they were constantly on drugs?

  • @johng7423
    @johng7423 4 роки тому +1

    the renault car at the start wouldnt work on a sleeping policeman speed bump

  • @nidhishization
    @nidhishization 4 роки тому +1

    All are important to bring live

  • @ungas024
    @ungas024 2 роки тому

    That bio-degradable plastic have been invented for how many years now and here i am waiting for it to fully replaced the current plastic.

  • @adorable6385
    @adorable6385 4 роки тому +1

    Your on to something; the ejecting plane section, water cleaning, wheels for the environment

  • @kentneumann5209
    @kentneumann5209 3 роки тому

    The floating garbage collector would probably get too full and too heavy and sink if left unsupervised. Especially if it takes on oil slicks.
    It needs work.
    A better collection design would be a large craft with floating arms that extend outward from the craft that skim the surface and sweep debris into a V shape that has a larger version of their machine at the bottom point of the V, with a mesh net bag, which is supported by cables that can be reeled in, cinched up, dropped onto a deck, into a hold, or onto a barge, then replaced with another bag.
    Get on it.

  • @Dc_tech386
    @Dc_tech386 4 роки тому

    the airplane crash savings life pad is the best

  • @earthflute2248
    @earthflute2248 3 роки тому

    Seabin was invented by Australians from Byron Bay. Also as of mid 2019 they had 600 working production units installed. They crowd sourced their expansion end 2019.

  • @theneoangeles
    @theneoangeles 3 роки тому

    a concept car is not an invention, it's just something weird that you're never gona see on the road😁

  • @philipsamuels526
    @philipsamuels526 4 роки тому +1

    I think the answer is yes. I like the idea of the taxi, the plane rescue capsule, communications balloon, air taxi. I think other ideas need more informational study for impacts on the environment from long term use and the human health impacts.

  • @sonyaokuneva6545
    @sonyaokuneva6545 4 роки тому

    The plane idea is good

  • @VerifyTheTruth
    @VerifyTheTruth 4 роки тому +1

    The bio plastic too.

  • @RavelaSekhar3569
    @RavelaSekhar3569 3 роки тому

    👌 Super Concepts 👏👏👏

  • @ljprep6250
    @ljprep6250 2 роки тому

    I really love the underwater breathing apparatus, Triton. CORA is pretty cool, too. All depends on price. How about including sourcing for these inventions, IT? How can we find out more?

    • @CallelMooney
      @CallelMooney 2 роки тому

      It doesn't work...seen a video debunking it, you would drowned

  • @lynn6297
    @lynn6297 3 роки тому

    The underwater breathing piece was proven a scam a while ago. The surface area of the device is not nearly enough to attempt to filter enough air to breathe and the offshoots hid mini oxygen tanks that didn't even hold 15 minutes.

  • @iqbang9236
    @iqbang9236 4 роки тому

    I have been thinking that last part of airplane capsule a few years ago (My original thought was that the capsule will be top mounted). Apart from safety benefits in case of emergencies, it can also save a large amount of boarding, luggage handling, cleaning time while the airplane can do its refueling and other checking/preparing works. The downside is it could add more risk issues. So it needs a cost-benefit rethinking.

  • @T0MT0Mmmmy
    @T0MT0Mmmmy 2 роки тому

    Inventions the world doesn't need and aren't the solution for nothing!

  • @ReddMot
    @ReddMot 4 роки тому

    great ideas

  • @tibetyldz3251
    @tibetyldz3251 3 роки тому +2

    the one with photosynthesis looks so amazing and healthy for the good of everyone

    • @pickle3719
      @pickle3719 3 роки тому

      If they redid it so it fit regular wheel sizes, I could see it going into effect.

  • @AmrKafi2020
    @AmrKafi2020 4 роки тому +4

    It seems to me that all of them are coming to real life very soon, sooner than anyone believe.

  • @randyscj429
    @randyscj429 4 роки тому

    The aircraft industry has shown for years, they only care about their profits not the passengers who have ZERO ability for rescue when the aircraft goes south!!! Sincerely Randy.

    • @pickle3719
      @pickle3719 3 роки тому

      Think military applications.

  • @kentneumann5209
    @kentneumann5209 3 роки тому

    The passenger taxi that looks like a car with a couch in it could work on the interior of a massive enclosed area. It would never work outdoors due to the hub over wheel design. Any type of precipitation or garbage, roadkill, rocks, potholes, frost heaves, etc would fuck that pretty mobile couch right up, right quick.

  • @jacobrempfer1589
    @jacobrempfer1589 3 роки тому

    that first car might have some issues with speedbumps :/, looks cool tho

    • @pickle3719
      @pickle3719 3 роки тому +1

      I'd worry more about drunks after a night of partying. Think of the clean up.

  • @rerimontgomery6272
    @rerimontgomery6272 4 роки тому

    I am very positive to this possible inventions just ad some water safe car's in case of flooding

  • @davevuong1074
    @davevuong1074 2 роки тому

    I like no crack plans concept.

  • @mongcharlie1
    @mongcharlie1 4 роки тому +1

    You get thumbs down for including the Triton

  • @jwanga1
    @jwanga1 3 роки тому

    I have no doubts these can be achieved in real Life ✅😇

  • @downbntout
    @downbntout 4 роки тому

    That car can't handle one little pothole. Somebody thinks roads are perfect? Smh

  • @shamshudinpremji7427
    @shamshudinpremji7427 4 роки тому +1

    THIS IS FUTURE, JUST ACCEPTE IT........

  • @davidbishop456
    @davidbishop456 4 роки тому

    the floating platforms are ideal for setting up a way to remove the marine layer preventing rain in California to fall west of the Sierra Nevada.

  • @PrinzMidas
    @PrinzMidas 4 роки тому

    Interesting "Taxi", but it will still take round about 15 to 20 years, to see such cars regularly on the streets.

    • @cadavher
      @cadavher 4 роки тому

      I thought them saying 2020 was way to early. Even if they mass produce them, they would still need to figure out flight routes and safe heights and properly train people to run them. Not to mention all the new landing pads and areas they would need to make/ designate lol. I doubt they can just land in your driveway or on a busy street to drop you off like a actual car. If that video isnt a complete lie like Triton, it would really be neat to see it in action though!

  • @tonythedwvyer
    @tonythedwvyer 3 роки тому

    The Triton thing is complete bollocks. It's not possible to extract enough oxygen from water using ones lungs as a pump. That's absolute nonsense. At 10 mtrs the average person needs 50 ltrs of GAS a minute just to breathe! Where's that coming from?

  • @7fink7
    @7fink7 2 роки тому

    If with these GoodYear tires you will get Green Tax anyways?? 🤔😅😁

  • @tomgober953
    @tomgober953 3 роки тому

    Very few people survive a plane crash. Smaller planes should have Shoots.

  • @kentneumann5209
    @kentneumann5209 3 роки тому

    The passenger air bus that parachutes the passenger cabin to safety will never happen in commercial airlines.
    However, I can see it happening as a method of quick troop or equipment or supply deployment, or maybe a disposable, temporary surgical unit, lab, or shelter from the elements, by dropping into an area that has no landing strip.
    Maybe even manned by a small crew and dropped as a quick deploy floating medical rescue unit for multiple people in the water.
    It could use those gyro stabilizers for the surgeries.
    It could then be later retrieved, picked up or pulled in tow by standard water craft.
    Far more likely to happen if its a military contract.

  • @CallelMooney
    @CallelMooney 2 роки тому

    Triton breathing thing doesn't work, you would drowned trying to get a breath of air from it under water