FOX Exocet 0.30mm monofilament fishing line test

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лип 2024
  • Draft, weight, diameter, wear and tensile strength. The main features that arise when choosing a fishing line.
    On the channel, I examine the monofilament and braided fishing lines, hooks, and swivels based on the above-mentioned aspects.
    In today's episode, I am testing the FOX Exocet 0.30mm monofilament fishing line, which I recommend specifically for grass carp and carp anglers.
    Can you find out if monofilament fishing line absorbs water?
    Does the weight of the line change if it is in the water for 24 hours?
    Does it affect the load capacity and other properties if the line is wet?
    And a few more interesting things….
    #carpfihing #monilament #fishing
    Content:
    00:00 FOX Exocet 0.30mm monofilament fishing line - Introduction
    00:10 Unpacking
    01:12 Diameter test
    02:07 Weight test
    02:43 Abrasion resistance test
    03:38 Descent test
    04:05 Tensile strength test
    05:21 Table
    05:41 Recommended - Matrix Horizon 0.22mm monofilament line
    It is often a topic with my fishing acquaintances that the manufacturers, compared to their capabilities, provide the customer with very little and sometimes not necessarily real information about fishing tools and accessories, which are now supported by serious technological developments. Today, fishing has developed into a very prominent business. Anglers have every right to expect the data on the products to be accurate and verifiable.
    What exactly do I mean?
    I would highlight fishing lines in particular, as I find the situation in this area to be the most worrying.
    When choosing a line, the diameter and tensile strength immediately come to mind. This is no accident, as these data are the most noticeable after the product name. Today, in the case of reputable manufacturers, these data are most likely real or at least close to it. However, there is no longer any information or regulation about the exact conditions under which these test results were obtained. I am thinking here of whether, for example, the result of a knotted or straight line tensile strength test is indicated. Dry or wet line may have been used when testing the fishing line. Furthermore, it would be very important to know the partial results that give the average value, since they show the percentage of variance during the given test, for example during the fishing line tensile strength test.
    In addition, we can also see on the product that the given fishing line has, for example, low elongation (what percentage is the elongation value), and that it has high wear resistance, the question also arises, compared to what? To mention only a few without claiming to be complete.
    In Europe, the Line Charta program of the EFTTA organization has embraced the verification of the authenticity of data on fishing lines. If the data provided by the manufacturer and/or distributor of the fishing equipment correspond to reality within a 10 percent tolerance, the association allows the use of the logo indicating reliable certification for the manufacturer and/or distributor. Joining the association is voluntary.
    Unfortunately, however, there are also many gaps in the fishing line test result tables published by EFTTA. I'm thinking here of the partial results already mentioned, in addition to the fishing line diameter and tensile strength, as well as the examination of data on wear and elongation.
    But the biggest problem is not being able to find recent fishing line test results, at least I unfortunately couldn't find any more recent than 2021.
    I see a similar problem with other fishing accessories and fishing trinkets. Although there is some information on the packaging. The data referring to the size can almost always be found on the packaging of the hooks, clips, and swivels, but only a small number of manufacturers indicate the value indicating the maximum load capacity, while almost none of them indicate the weight of the product.
    I perform the tests statically. Which means that the test results of fishing equipment are correct under the given conditions. Of course, these values, organized into a complete fishing skill, vary greatly depending on the properties of the fishing rod and the setting of the fishing reel, as well as the angler's technique.
    My goal is to create a clear and repeatable test process, taking into account the mentioned aspects, and record the test results in a table. You can follow this process via @FishingForceTackleTester's youtube channel.
    It is important to point out that the fishing lines and accessories tested by me were not made in laboratory conditions and with untested devices.
    As a result, I can neither refute nor confirm the values indicated by the manufacturers and/or distributors with the results!
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 10

  • @AndrewdaPp
    @AndrewdaPp Рік тому +1

    Nagyon köszönjük a videókat! Igazán profik lettek minden szempontból. Daiwa Tournament tesztet én nagyon szivesen megnéznék.

  • @attilaszucs7521
    @attilaszucs7521 Рік тому +1

    Egy érdekes szösszenet: Megpróbáltam a csatornádat a facsén a Dunai Horgászok csoportban közhasznú információként közzé tenni(az adminoknak kell jóvá hagyni), de indoklás nélkül elutasították. Sporik így-meg sporttársak úgy...........ja persze :))

    • @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt
      @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt  Рік тому +1

      Nagyon köszönöm, rendes tőled. Sajnos én is belefutok ebbe. Reklámnak veszik, pedig csak információt nyújtok, legjobb tudásom szerint. Nem árulok semmit. Mindent magam finanszírozok. Sajnálatos, hogy elutasítják. Pedig minél több tartalom lesz, annál hasznosabb és informatívabb lesz csatorna. Ha posztolsz néha a videók alá, esetleg megosztod pár ismerősöddel az már nagy segítség 😉👍

  • @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt

    A megbízhatósági ranglistáról bővebben itt olvashatsz:
    ua-cam.com/channels/Ta-BzpuqbsEzcdNO9OQlBA.htmlcommunity?lb=UgkxJzq_P-hVDoUGGJheKGMdDYsepHnuQDdE

    • @attilaszucs7521
      @attilaszucs7521 Рік тому

      biztos hogy jó a link, mert nem nyit meg semmit? :(

    • @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt
      @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt  Рік тому

      @@attilaszucs7521 , igen jó. Már podztoltak is a bejegyzés alá. De ha nem nyílik meg, akkor a csatornára belépve a közösségi fül alat találod a bejegyzést.

  • @attilaszucs7521
    @attilaszucs7521 Рік тому

    Kb. mennyi időt vesz igénybe egy zsinór tesztelése?

    • @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt
      @FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt  Рік тому

      Maga a teszt 2x2 óra kb. A videó anyag ellenőrzése, szétválogatása, rendezése kb 3 óra. A videó vágása kb 2x4 óra (kicsit lassú a gépem). Plusz ha a nézők által javasolt dolgot próbálok betenni a videóba , vagy ha csak simán újítani szeretnék valamit. Például legutóbb a diagram és az összegzések, ezek több órába is telhetnek. Munka után csinálom, így hetente egyenlőre egy videót tudok prezentálni. De ezt szeretném heti kettőre emelni.

    • @attilaszucs7521
      @attilaszucs7521 Рік тому +2

      @@FishingForceHorgaszKellekTeszt Számomra még az is érdekes, hogy a zsinórok többségénél jelentősen csökken a nedves szakítószilárdság, pedig a többség nem képek falraakasztására veszi :)