Don't Buy The Auto Seiko Sumo! Buy This Instead!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 сер 2021
  • CHECK OUT THE BEST OF ALIEXPRESS - PAGANI AND SAN MARTIN!
    jomw.link/ali-pagani-official
    jomw.link/ali-san-martin-offi...
    SEE MY SELECTION OF TOP VALUE WATCHES AND ACCESSORIES ON AMAZON!
    jomw.link/amazon
    USE THE CODE ‘JOMW10’ FOR 10% OFF ANY PHOIBOS!
    jomw.link/phoibos
    USE THE CODE ‘JOMW20’ FOR 20% OFF ANY XERIC!
    jomw.link/xeric
    YOU CAN NOW HELP OUT THE CHANNEL BY BECOMING A PATRON! THANKS!
    jomw.link/patreon
    (The Small Print: Some of the above links are affiliate links. I am an Amazon, Phoibos, Spinnaker, Xeric, eBay, Jomashop, Meranom, and AliExpress Associate. If you make a qualifying purchase, I am paid a small finder’s fee from the companies in question. You don’t pay any extra for the product. Thanks!)
    Courting controversy today, when I recommend the quartz version of a watch OVER the auto. Shock horror! I got a stellar deal on it, whihc undoubtedly helps shape my opinion of this one, but I'm getting increasingly bored of setting and winding autos every day. More quartz, Vicar? Cheers, Jody

КОМЕНТАРІ • 793

  • @EEE_MMM
    @EEE_MMM 3 роки тому +223

    I've never understood the hatred for quartz. I have a couple of them and I love the utility, the grab-and-go. I also love mechanical watches, the idea that you have springs and gears moving along as you go through your day really appeals to me in this increasingly digital world. I don't think the love for one excludes love for the other. Great video as always.

    • @huckinator
      @huckinator 3 роки тому +9

      I don’t know why quartz gets hate either. Considering it’s a huge advancement that caused a 70’s quartz crisis should have more people happy to wear them (especially if you lived through that time). Quartz are nice to have just for a switch up when you don’t feel like winding a watch or letting it run for days knowing you only wore it one day and it’ll have a power reserve for 50+ hours.

    • @watchingbrief7072
      @watchingbrief7072 3 роки тому +7

      Agree. The Seiko quartz watches of the 70-80s were as cutting edge as any piece. Jeweled, built to last and service and beautifully made. This was pre the cheap nasty plastic movements. I have a twin quartz that is thermocompensated and accurate to 15sec a year. At the time in Japan it would cost you a few thousand Oz. It was a luxury buy. Respect!

    • @FroschBube
      @FroschBube 3 роки тому +13

      I don't hate Quartz, I own a couple, I just find mechanical more appealing.

    • @nikandraathelvete
      @nikandraathelvete 3 роки тому +10

      No hate. I have 5, but to a collector automatics are more interesting

    • @Blue_3rd
      @Blue_3rd 3 роки тому +4

      Same here.
      I love my autos but have several quartz and enjoy them just as much. 👍👍

  • @mountainmanwatchreviews8081
    @mountainmanwatchreviews8081 3 роки тому +47

    The solar just pushes it over the top. This is all the watch you'd ever need. I used to be an auto snob but more and more I'm loving solar seikos, citizens and casios. Just so nice to never have to set, wind or change a battery.

  • @Olddirtytiger
    @Olddirtytiger 3 роки тому +44

    "everytime i think i'm out they pull me back in"
    Jody's relationship with Seiko 😂😂

    • @olivergoldvalente
      @olivergoldvalente 3 роки тому +6

      Yeah I thought he was stopping reviews of Seiko watches.

    • @StrawNonHuman
      @StrawNonHuman 3 роки тому +1

      Did jody ever explain it? I don't think I was able to catch it?

    • @andrea81
      @andrea81 3 роки тому +2

      He said he would stop to review EXPENSIVE Seikos.

  • @docswatchbox8321
    @docswatchbox8321 3 роки тому +36

    Coke or Pepsi, Quartz or Automatic, Star Wars or Star Trek. It’s always there for people to argue about. Some of us are content with loving both. That’s why I dig your channel, brother.

    • @manoflego123
      @manoflego123 3 роки тому +1

      I can tell I'm too into this hobby when my first thought to your comment was "what's a Coke bezel?"

    • @birdytiger
      @birdytiger 3 роки тому +2

      More find of the root beer bezel myself lol

    • @blackdragon44
      @blackdragon44 3 роки тому

      Neither, both, both

    • @oliverfasola19
      @oliverfasola19 2 роки тому +1

      Quartz or auto?
      Grand Seiko: yes

  • @kesfitzgerald1084
    @kesfitzgerald1084 3 роки тому +83

    I enjoy mechanical watches but as I am lucky to be able to have a modest collection, not exclusively. Quartz have their place and there are some beautiful pieces about. Honestly by being blind to quartz as a category you will miss out on the whole other world of horology.

    • @larrydunn4626
      @larrydunn4626 3 роки тому +2

      I am over quartz. I've had four quartz watches (Seiko, Citizen, and a mountaineering watch whose name escapes me) and one mechanical auto -- a used Rolex datejust from the 1970s over the past 30 years. On the mountaineering you use a nickel to twist off the batter cover, but I stripped it out. The others I'd have to take to a jeweler (try to find a watch shop these days), and $15 or $20 and the time to do a roundtrip to drop off and pick up is just too irritating. Have never spent a dime on the Rolex over all these years, nor had to make battery replacement trips. So my last two watches have been mechanical automatics.
      I'd be OK with a ten year battery... a combination battery/solar, but that's about it.

    • @pranavkamath4329
      @pranavkamath4329 3 роки тому +7

      @@larrydunn4626 I’ve got maybe 7 quartz watches and a few dozen mechanical. Between a fine screwdriver set and a swiss army knife I’ve never had to pay anyone to swap batteries

    • @birdytiger
      @birdytiger 3 роки тому +1

      I have a uniform wares overpriced quartz, but absolutely love it. 2 hand, beyond minimal. Admittedly stupid.

    • @pacovl46
      @pacovl46 3 роки тому +1

      That totally depends on how you look at watches. Yeah, quartz does have its place in the world of horology, no doubt about it. Quartz watches can do stuff that mechanical watches can’t, no doubt about that, too, but a quartz watch in my opinion is just that - a watch, while a mechanical watch even in its simplest form is a piece of art. Making a hundred or more pieces come together to work precise is not an easy feat and I’m talking about the days of yonder when all watches were completely handmade, which nowadays is reserved to some of the luxury brands. The way some mechanical movements look due to their decoration is just mind blowing. Take the back off a quartz watch on the other hand and it’s the exact opposite of a stunner.
      I acknowledge the existence of quartz watches and I acknowledge their place in horology, but they’re definitely not for me! I prefer a proper mechanical watch over a quartz one any time of the day and to say I’m missing out because I don’t get into them isn’t true either. That’s like saying you’re missing out in the world of fruit because you don’t like oranges. What advantage would eating an orange bring me, if I don’t like the taste?! I know what quartz watches can do, but I don’t need them apart from the countdown function when I cook, for that I use the quartz watch in my mobile phone, but even that could be replaced by a mechanical one, if I wanted to, but I’m not that anal about it. 🙂
      I’m also not a fan of single use batteries. The only watch that is part quartz that I’d actually like to own is one with a spring drive movement, which in my opinion is the first new technology to power a watch since the dawn of quartz.

    • @varanid9
      @varanid9 3 роки тому +6

      @@pacovl46 With modern computerized production methods, it doesn't require "artists" to make a very precise mechanical watch any more. Why do you think Seiko Turtles and Samurais are so cheap? And, yes, they'll last just as long as a Rolex; I've had both.

  • @mutolo1990
    @mutolo1990 3 роки тому +72

    Some of the watch snobs hating quartz movements on seikos will still bend over for a g shock or a casio. Maybe it's the price difference? Plus I don't really count solar modules as quartz - more like quartz 2.0 or quartz +

    • @stevenkelby2169
      @stevenkelby2169 3 роки тому +9

      Casio have never made a mechanical watch. If you want a tough watch, there's no competition.

    • @philspencelayh5464
      @philspencelayh5464 3 роки тому +2

      I dont know that many people actually hate quartz. I have one that gets used for sailing. It works but is not interesting I'll probably get another when its done (they definitely don't last like mechanicals in my experience ) but one at a time is enough.

    • @mutolo1990
      @mutolo1990 3 роки тому +1

      @@rw2266 perhaps I was a little harsh! After all watches can be such a marmite topic

    • @antoniotula262
      @antoniotula262 3 роки тому +9

      Like most of us here, I have mechanical, G-Shock, Solar & regular quartz. Love em all, but I must admit my favorites are Citizen Promasters (1 on diver strap, other on bracelet). They just run & need nothing, look great, great lume. Maybe some find that boring bcz no need to tinker with them. I do understand this as I love setting & winding my mechanicals. That's why it's good to experience them all.

    • @Zundfolge
      @Zundfolge 3 роки тому +3

      I flatly do not understand the love of the G-Shock or other Casio digital watches amongst watch enthusiasts ... I assume it must be some sort of weird nostalgia thing (and I'm a little older than these typical G-Shock lovers, so maybe its a generational thing).

  • @seannew8930
    @seannew8930 3 роки тому +23

    Jody saying “no more seiko”: 🖐
    Jody seeing a great deal: 🖖

  • @matthewgurlitz3514
    @matthewgurlitz3514 3 роки тому +6

    Vinyl vs. CDs is a great analogy! I've never heard anyone put it that way before.

  • @frankgerace5997
    @frankgerace5997 3 роки тому +10

    When I first started collecting watches, I was an auto snob. I still like automatic watches, and manual-wind mechanicals, but I’ve wised up. G-Shocks converted me, and I’m now a quartz watch fan too!! I’m in radio, and one of the cool parts about a quartz digital watch (this also applies to mechanicals and Ana-digis made to be anti-magnetic) is that I can spend hours working around speakers, transmitters and other equipment without worrying about my watch getting magnetized, so now I’ll buy a mechanical or a quartz, as long as I like the look and features of the watch.

  • @asamisato876
    @asamisato876 3 роки тому +7

    When I first got into watches, everyone around me said dont buy quartz ugh buy a mechanical! And I've purchased zero quartz till last year and wow it's a life changer! I love my quartz pieces as much as my mechanicals and couldn't be happier with what I have

  • @macblack82
    @macblack82 3 роки тому +7

    Always nice having a quartz in the collection. Sometimes you don’t want to have to worry about setting the time or date, you just want to pick something up that you know is already set and ready to go.

  • @snacklofter
    @snacklofter 3 роки тому +8

    Thank you Jody - Seiko quartz watches are really growing on me - having a lot of automatics, they look after themselves and are great to just grab and go! atb snack.

  • @clontstable1
    @clontstable1 2 роки тому +2

    The only problem I’ve ever had with Quartz is the 3-5 year battery change, but Solar has mostly solved that problem.

  • @thaumaturgeishere331
    @thaumaturgeishere331 3 роки тому +6

    I have both, including a Grand Seiko spring drive. All great watches but the quartz ones are remarkably accurate.

  • @CS-wo5hd
    @CS-wo5hd 3 роки тому +1

    This Chronograph reminds me of the Tissot Seastar 1000 Chronograph I purchased a couple years ago. A great alternative to this divers Chronograph. It's Quartz and it's in my top 4 favorites in my collection (that includes both autos and quartz). Beautiful, functional, and has gained half a second between daylight savings time settings. And yes, I do actually snorkle with it. I can't wait to go diving with it!

  • @THEMADWATCHCOLLECTOR
    @THEMADWATCHCOLLECTOR 3 роки тому +10

    I though Seiko’s were banned on this channel now Jody?!?!?!;) it’s a cool watch!

    • @scbr2458
      @scbr2458 3 роки тому +2

      Seiko watches costing more than $1000 *

    • @gnarl12
      @gnarl12 3 роки тому

      Ahahah

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 3 роки тому

      @@scbr2458 If you payed more than a grand for this you're drunk!!

  • @Brajin1
    @Brajin1 3 роки тому +2

    Huge fan of the sumo. I purchased the green 3rd gen. Ended up modding with ceramic bezel insert and Strapcode bracelets. I likely would have given a solid look if the solar sumo was out there without the chrono module.

  • @JohnClarkW
    @JohnClarkW 2 роки тому

    I always loved the SSC017 for very similar reasons. It was a smaller and more modestly priced version with the SKX sizing and handset, but it had the busy dial problem that most chronos fight with. Most of my watches are mechanical, but I have some quartz too.

  • @Dicey151
    @Dicey151 3 роки тому +24

    That T-shirt? Speedball 2? Brings back memories…”Ice Cream, Ice Cream.”

    • @JustOneMoreWatch
      @JustOneMoreWatch  3 роки тому +6

      Hahahaha! Loved that game so much.

    • @jonnyholmes5580
      @jonnyholmes5580 3 роки тому +1

      Yes!

    • @Dicey151
      @Dicey151 3 роки тому +2

      @@JustOneMoreWatch 1990… wow I was 12

    • @MC-yh9bw
      @MC-yh9bw 3 роки тому

      Dam, good pick up. I couldn't remember where I knew those faces. Loved that game.

    • @prefectionist
      @prefectionist 3 роки тому

      Best shirt yet! Touchdown!

  • @nimmichagger165
    @nimmichagger165 3 роки тому +70

    Regardless of how good a deal it is, you can’t escape the fact that the dial is an absolute mess. Not for me.

    • @traviswalker8933
      @traviswalker8933 3 роки тому +2

      Doesn't look that messy to me.

    • @damyr
      @damyr 3 роки тому +2

      I mean, that's just a wrong comparison, because every chronograph has a messy dial. That's why I would never consider to buy one.

    • @traviswalker8933
      @traviswalker8933 3 роки тому

      @@damyr it has to display timing data, so that's a given

    • @nimmichagger165
      @nimmichagger165 3 роки тому +2

      @@damyr
      Not necessarily - Rolex, Tudor, Zenith all make good looking chronos that look tidy, symmetrical and balanced. On this, the way they’ve hacked into the 4 o’clock index to put in the date window just looks lazy and an afterthought.

    • @mattewj1268
      @mattewj1268 3 роки тому +1

      Yea it's a shambles.

  • @richardstorer-adam7222
    @richardstorer-adam7222 3 роки тому +5

    I am loving the quartz. I am getting sick of adjusting the autos in my collection twice a week.

  • @musoman
    @musoman 3 роки тому

    I have an equal amount of quartz to analogue watches, my most recent purchase was a MWC ‘Dirty Dozen’ a 36mm homage with broad arrow
    and running seconds - i’m in love! It’s a fantastic wee watch with 100m water resistance and great lume. Had to dye the skin coloured strap
    with some brown wood stain, but besides that, it’s fantastic. Keep up the good work amigo.

  • @luykenstouten1145
    @luykenstouten1145 3 роки тому +4

    More food for thought… 🤔 I’ve got some Promaster Eco-drives in the collection that have been my grab-and-go’s for years now, and compared to them I couldn’t agree more that the solar cells could have been better integrated on this Seiko. But still, at that price… Thank you for the review! ⭐️👊🏻

  • @bingogarvin2924
    @bingogarvin2924 3 роки тому +1

    Thanks for your time 🕥, I am into automatic watches,gears😍, accidentally bought a Seiko kinetic, rotor spun when I shook it,was bummed gave it to my 😺 cat, now I love it,shake once a day,super accurate,set other watches by it

  • @michaelkeefer4293
    @michaelkeefer4293 3 роки тому +1

    I enjoy vinyl and CDs as well as automatic and quartz watches! I like retro but embrace the modern also for practicality. Great review, keep up the good work!

  • @loganoftherockies9453
    @loganoftherockies9453 2 роки тому

    Thanks Jody for giving this wonderful watch some love, totally agree with you. These solar quartz imho have the best of both worlds in terms of accuracy and no frequent battery changes, plus tons of value bc they don't have the same prestige premium as similarly spec'd autos. I bought the blue dial version of this, SSC759J1, which is also sapphire crystal and ceramic bezel. My only complaint was the silicon strap (and am in that "Seiko needs to step up their straps and bracelets" camp), so I put mine on an orange rubber Strapcode to make it pop like crazy as a fun watch. The case shape is a little different than the auto Sumo, so also haven't been able to find a nice stainless bracelet except for straight end link. As for wrist size, I'm a 6.75 inches tops and this watch actually doesn't feel the least bit big. The lugs curve down so smoothly it's really not an issue at all. In fact, had I not looked up specs, I'd have guessed it was more like a 48-49 mm lug to lug, and didn't notice it feeling any bigger than my Turtle.

  • @Arthurzeiro
    @Arthurzeiro 3 роки тому +64

    "Quartz has no soul" wrote the person on his computer instead of using a typewriter with paper and sending the message through carrier pigeon.
    Edit: Carburettors vs Electronic Fuel Injection is the ultimate analog to Mechanical vs Quartz.

    • @mattewj1268
      @mattewj1268 3 роки тому

      Yes that analogy is accurate.

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 3 роки тому +2

      I saw a hipster at a cafe the other day with a typewriter and a battery powerd record player on his table! I kid you not. ;-)

    • @ohmyquarz
      @ohmyquarz 2 роки тому

      @@cosmicenforcer2534 There are quartz watches that would surprise you. Take a look at the Mondaine Stop2Go or the Bulova Moonwatch.

  • @jasonn.1132
    @jasonn.1132 3 роки тому +1

    I think if someone has a super busy life then quartz or solar watches are a perfect choice. The dial is a bit busy. If there was some color gradient between the dial, bezel, or sub-dials, then maybe it wouldn't be obvious. Great video Jody! Thanks!

  • @OFD
    @OFD 2 роки тому +2

    Excellent video!! I LOVE QUARTZ WATCHES!! Started my watch adventure in '82 with my 7548 quartz. Still running perfectly today with 1 service and a handful of battery change. Thanks for this video man!! Love that solar chronograph 🔥💯

  • @aland6785
    @aland6785 3 роки тому +1

    Most of my small collection of watches are autos but my two work watches are tool quartz pieces. They are both decent watches and add interest to the collection, one you can drive a tank over apparently and the other has tritium tubes 😃

  • @royroblox
    @royroblox 3 роки тому +2

    Great video Jody! I always wished there were more quartz dive chronos out there, still on the lookout for a 40-42mm one to fit my tiny wrist. This one looks like a beast!

  • @davidrosenblum2178
    @davidrosenblum2178 3 роки тому +4

    I have a Seiko Mecaquartz chrono, the retro Recraft style, and think it's great. Because it has the tachymeter chapter ring and no rotating bezel I don't have to concern myself with misalignment issues, at least not in that regard. Wish it were possible to set the 24-hour subdial separately to have a second time zone but otherwise it's a reliable and accurate movement. Cheers mate!

    • @jrgdrumsandwatches
      @jrgdrumsandwatches 3 роки тому

      I had one of these and loved it but the printing was off, didn't match the indices. Apart from that I love the mecaquartz movements, very accurate, set it and don't think about it untill it needs a battery change every 2-3 years.

    • @mattewj1268
      @mattewj1268 3 роки тому

      That sounds very cool, I will have to look it up.

  • @m47r1m
    @m47r1m 3 роки тому +10

    I love my Citizen Nighthawk as a quick grab and go beater. My only issue with quartz is the price. Around 300-400 is where I draw the line. Beyond that, I would rather get an automatic.

    • @chillwill120
      @chillwill120 3 роки тому +2

      Why? Automatic is not inherently more expensive. You can buy a crappy $30 automatic made in China, just like you can buy a crappy $30 quartz made in China. Or you can buy a beautifully finished, high quality quartz that will last a lifetime for thousands, just like you can buy a high end mechanical for thousands. One is not inherently more expensive or valuable than the other. What matters is the quality and finishing etc.

    • @manoflego123
      @manoflego123 3 роки тому +4

      The price and complexity of mechanical scales up way faster than quartz, so I hear you. The exception I can think of is something like the G-Shock Frogman watches, which are around 500 or above but are basically the pinnacle of tool watches due to the features and durability.

    • @donquique1
      @donquique1 3 роки тому +1

      @@manoflego123 you will not find a fake eco drive anywhere others than the easy spotavle ones on wish. Now for rolex.... i would take my blue angel as an end of the world watch versus any mechanical.

  • @mikesey1
    @mikesey1 3 роки тому

    Great looking watch, and Solar too! No battery/capacitor change needed for 10 years+ which you didn't mention. Definitely on my shopping list.

  • @defender1006
    @defender1006 3 роки тому

    A brilliant and well argued presentation on the great Mechanical vs Quartz debate, they both have their place. I love steam engines, classic cars and bikes etc, but I wouldn't want to have to rely on them everyday, we've moved on, but that doesn't mean we can't still own, use and enjoy them for what they are?
    Can I recommend the the Seiko V175-OADO not a PROSPEX, Sumo or PADI version but still an ISO spec 200M Divers watch, I bought mine slightly used two years ago, for a good price, it's a brilliant watch, not too big for those of us with smaller wrists and is always ready to go and I love it to bits.

  • @Gary_W
    @Gary_W 3 роки тому

    Hello Jory, great video as always! Quick question, does the 24h subdial can be set independently i.e set as a second timezone? I've been interested in the solar chrono Sumo for some time, but can't find any information about that. Many thanks in advance and warmest regards!

  • @mmcallery
    @mmcallery 3 роки тому

    I love a good quartz, my Seiko darth tuna hasn't lost any time since I set it 3 weeks ago. super accurate and super tough, for a tool watch it just makes more sense.

  • @rioriggs3568
    @rioriggs3568 3 роки тому

    I love my quartz... most being equipped with the Seiko VK meca-quartz. Love the fact I can simply put it on and go.

  • @forrest225
    @forrest225 3 роки тому

    Quartz certainly has its advantages. Both of my work watches are solar and atomic g-shocks. Never any worries about winding or the time being off, nor worries about magnetization or other damage. I wear my square most ofbthe time, but the range man comes out once or twice a month.

  • @benburgess9428
    @benburgess9428 3 роки тому +2

    I’m an Ani-Digi freak, so I’m rather bound to quartz movements. I do own one hand-wind watch, but I mostly just give it a wind every once in a while to watch the little springs and gears dance in perfect harmony. I think mechanical movements are mesmerizing to look at, but as far as actual timekeeping I’m sticking to my Quartz pieces.

  • @jeditrek
    @jeditrek 3 роки тому +1

    Great looking Seiko Sumo Chrono. I love the Sumo case and build quality. Such a great price too!

  • @V12BenzAMG
    @V12BenzAMG 3 роки тому

    Awesome deal Jody and great review...i already have the save the ocean and dark blue soloar chrono versions but I'll be looking for one of these as well!

  • @felixzabala4427
    @felixzabala4427 3 роки тому

    I enjoyed this installment very much. Your prior review on the Casio Duro was one of the compelling reasons I considered one and bought one for my use in the ocean for metal detecting. It made no sense to me to have something automatic, and that I would have to keep readjusting the time and date every time I took it out for use. In fact, I would venture to say, why would anyone use anything other than an inexpensive quartz diver for the actual ocean? Why risk an expensive auto that you're constantly fiddling with the crown to adjust the time and wearing down the seal the gasket provides? If I had Bill Gates kind of money I guess it wouldn't matter...but even he wears a Duro.

  • @Kasaner
    @Kasaner 3 роки тому

    that voice over when talking about the dial on the mechanical was hilarious. you are a comedian at heart sir. I come for the watches but stay for the laughs

  • @BrittPearceWatches
    @BrittPearceWatches 3 роки тому

    I couldn't agree more! I just did a video on the quartz crisis & some of the quartz gatekeeping in watch fam. Fantastically done J! Loved this video... AS ALWAYS!

  • @balanasios
    @balanasios 2 роки тому

    Hello and thanks for the very informative reviews you make:)
    I just bought a Seiko Sumo Chronograph and I am planning to change the bezel insert. Since you have both, the regular and the Solar Chrono Sumo, can you tell me if the bezels have the same dimensions?

  • @richardshaw1968
    @richardshaw1968 3 роки тому

    Lumed second hand is required for iso certification. Difficult comparing chrono to three hander, an interesting comparison would be Certina COSC quartz chrono against an auto chrono, they do both in their ds range.

  • @chriscon8463
    @chriscon8463 3 роки тому

    I just purchased a 37mm Citizen Eco Drive field watch after only wearing autos for years. I don’t think I’d like a quartz that uses a battery, but solar is pretty awesome! I’m really liking the dimensions, weight, & ease of use of this watch.

  • @marcgoulding5230
    @marcgoulding5230 3 роки тому +1

    I don't get the knee-jerk over quartz either! I mostly have autos, but also a bunch of quartz and a couple of digi Casios. They're all great in my eyes.

  • @johnsrabe
    @johnsrabe 3 роки тому +2

    9:45 Jody, the international rules of audio production require that when you go back in time you add echo AND a harp gliss. We’ll let it slide this time.

  • @gamesetmatt23
    @gamesetmatt23 3 роки тому +8

    Why is it that you can buy quartz wall clocks with sweeping seconds hands on the cheap, but it's incredibly rare to find a quartz watch with this feature?? (Not counting chrono seconds hands)
    This would make quartz watches a lot more attractive to me... I hate a ticking hand missing the markers.

    • @janiniinivirta2474
      @janiniinivirta2474 3 роки тому

      i have been wondering the same thing.

    • @jerryglasses2229
      @jerryglasses2229 3 роки тому +3

      My understanding is that sweeping seconds use more battery life. Wall clocks aren't a problem because they have easy to change large batteries

    • @richardshaw1968
      @richardshaw1968 3 роки тому

      @@janiniinivirta2474 it’s down to power consumption

    • @gamesetmatt23
      @gamesetmatt23 3 роки тому +1

      @@jerryglasses2229 I feel like we should have advanced far enough along with battery technology to overcome this by now.
      And I don't mind changing the battery, what? Once a year? Every 6 months, even? If it means I don't have to look at a dodgy ticking hand.

    • @bboooobbyy
      @bboooobbyy 3 роки тому +2

      @@gamesetmatt23 There's also the fact that a preference for sweeping seconds is far from universal. And there is utility to being able to.count out each distinct second as they happen. So it's not simply a technical/power consumption issue

  • @markbyrum4743
    @markbyrum4743 3 роки тому

    I've established "detente" re quartz recently, starting when I purchased an LL Bean quartz field watch with gift certificates (quartz is all they sell these days). I go over it because of the Tritium hands and markers. Then I won an eBay auction for a Gekota quartz watch by mistake (thought it was a mechanical watch). So now I'm over it. Still prefer mechanical, but quartz is okay too. Good vid. Keep at it!

  • @brentwoods7450
    @brentwoods7450 3 роки тому

    Jody I bought a old Prospex divers chrono this year, and I didn't think I would enjoy as much as I have. My first quartz in many years

  • @christopherjohnson4276
    @christopherjohnson4276 3 роки тому

    This Sumo might be the way I lean also. Thanks for shining the light on this one Jody!

  • @bogrot69
    @bogrot69 3 роки тому

    It's a beauty! I own the Coral Blue Auto and I love that watch, it is the 6R15 variant however. I also own a Solar PADI edition diver and it's a fantastic watch as well. You made out very well at that price. I would have been all over it. Curious, have you heard about the Cartier SolarBeat Tank? The cells are accessed through the roman numerals on the dial! Brilliant! 😁

  • @jamessmith6402
    @jamessmith6402 3 роки тому

    Fabulous watch first time I've seen a quartz Sumo I love it👍 thanks Jody

  • @adamp5951
    @adamp5951 3 роки тому

    Hi, Jody. I love your extreme close ups of dials and the time lapse. How do the running seconds hand and the minute counter line up with their corresponding markers? I had a cheaper Seiko mechaquartz with a useless minute totalizer because of alignment issues.

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 3 роки тому

      They are tiny you won't even be able to even see it! That's why ppl prefer small running seconds over a large ticking seconds hand. Anyway, dont worry about it!

  • @BobMarley-pm1xb
    @BobMarley-pm1xb 2 роки тому

    I have a 70’s vintage Seiko Hybrid:Analog dial with a function screen on top…Chrono, Alarm, Day/Date, Digital Time Display. The screen is very weak but she still runs. And a Seiko tri-compax super chronograph from the mid 80’s. Runs like a dream and beyond belief accurate….37 years later. Quartz rocks !! Great review as always Jody. But man, that worthless 24 hour sub dial…..just as easy to put in a 12 hour totalizer. I’ve seen those for

  • @chillwill120
    @chillwill120 3 роки тому +5

    When it comes to Seiko, I only buy quartz. I have not had good experiences with 6r and other Seiko movements, but the quartz are great and more affordable.

    • @GODSPEEDseven
      @GODSPEEDseven 3 роки тому +1

      I'm really liking the V157 movement in the Seiko Solars. No bouncing ticks and so far, on both I have, second hits every marker on the chapters.

  • @graemecreegan6749
    @graemecreegan6749 3 роки тому +13

    Would love a quartz sumo just as much as an auto. However I strongly prefer the non-chrono dial. This is just too busy 😕

  • @JD-wi5zd
    @JD-wi5zd 3 роки тому

    Agreed on that chopped off index. If they had moved the date to more like 4:30, they wouldn't have had to do that. But I'm guessing that's the way the movement lined up. If I was designing that watch, I would have put rectangular indices (bars) on it instead of circles, and it would have fit.

  • @timefliesby-jleo474
    @timefliesby-jleo474 3 роки тому

    Love the fact that its solar at least! That way the caseback does not need to be removed to change the battery and affect the water resistance!!

  • @endlessrage4062
    @endlessrage4062 Рік тому

    Just bought one new, in blue, on a rubber strap for £260 so I’m pretty well chuffed. Thanks for helping me decide to go for it once found. 👍🏽👍🏽

  • @owengoodspeed5763
    @owengoodspeed5763 3 роки тому +1

    I enjoy mechanical watches but for a practical dive watch the fewer times the crown has to be unscrewed for adjustment or winding the better, so it would be very hard to argue against a solar powered quartz movement if this is to be a "tool watch".

  • @thinkthriver
    @thinkthriver 2 роки тому

    I have the black limited edition version. I am now considering this one or the blue one. Great review.

  • @nmhbrooklands
    @nmhbrooklands 3 роки тому

    Jody, Hi, just got to say that in a recent video you made a throwaway comment about how you take more links from the front section to improve wearability which triggered my OCD but I tried it and it really makes a difference! Revisited all my collection and they are all much more comfortable on wrist when set up this way. Maybe do a piece on it if you haven’t already. Love the channel!

  • @gynechiatrist
    @gynechiatrist 3 роки тому

    Solar quartz is a whole burger thing. No back to pop and no gaskets to grind. The window ledge by my desk always has one. And I have never had one stop functioning. And crazy accurate. And I love my perpetual calendars. And yes, some guys rock a big Sumo. Thanks.

  • @peterkarahalios3488
    @peterkarahalios3488 3 роки тому +4

    Love both technologies. Had let myself get dragged into the pro-mechanical crowd but then I got my first Quartz Grand Seiko. I now welcome both technologies and feel really good about it.

  • @georgemathai1014
    @georgemathai1014 2 роки тому

    Saw this for an amazing discount here in Dubai - saw your video to ensure it was a good watch to have. Thanks for the video and honest thoughts.

  • @chasp_0784
    @chasp_0784 3 роки тому +3

    More quartz vicar? Indeed sir. Just got a 38mm solar prospex on my wrist, love the grab and go aspect of it. Having a day/date is the easiest way to get ignored when I’m in a hurry 😂

  • @Capnblinski
    @Capnblinski 4 місяці тому +1

    Great channel great presentations. 🙂 Just ordered an 807 Japan with that gorgeous green dial.

    • @fungus70
      @fungus70 2 місяці тому

      Cool....I have that too.

  • @flymorenow
    @flymorenow 3 роки тому

    Picked up my Citizen Ti Eco-Drive Chronograph while in Jamaica many years ago. Perpetual calendar always has the correct date, keeps near perfect time and has never needed a battery. The annoying part is the 2nd hand stops in dim light to save power, then starts with some light. This stopping and starting of the 2nd hand can be really annoying.

  • @pkflash2004
    @pkflash2004 3 роки тому

    Hi Jody. I watched with interest as I'm currently looking at Seiko divers, just can't find one that hits the mark for me. Whether it's quartz or mechanical doesn't bother me too much - the look and wearability is far more important to my enjoyment of a watch. Someone commented that brands put more effort into how their mechanical watches looks as opposed to their quartz modes. Don't know how true this is. The recent Tissot Prx models offer both auto and quartz options which in turn offers the buyer a genuine choice between two very similar watches. The prices they retail at also gives the buyer choice. Maybe other brands could do this by offering the same watch models in both mechanical and quartz with price points reflective of the cost of the movement?

  • @Winston.S.1984
    @Winston.S.1984 3 роки тому

    No problem with quartz, apart from the ticking second hand of course - can't stand that! Meccaqartz or something like the Bulova precisionist series is worth a look

  • @victorutomo7244
    @victorutomo7244 3 роки тому

    I have the blue one.
    Other than the marker at 4, I don't like the dial.
    It's so different with what Seiko usually does. I guess the solar movement is the cause.
    But, it ticks everything that I want, big brand, solar, complication.
    When it comes in Seiko Sumo case at reasonable price, it is a BIG bonus.

  • @keesketsers5866
    @keesketsers5866 8 місяців тому

    I actually love the chopped lume dot for the date window. Breitling does that WAY more often and I just like the quirky look. I've never been OCD about dial layout. Just bought this exact watch in Padi Pepsi dial version.

  • @garymorrison277
    @garymorrison277 2 роки тому

    I've just bought my first Seiko, this one but with the blue face and black silicone strap for £275 UK pounds that's equal to 480 Australian dollars, on sale at half price and yes, I'll be sourcing a stainless steel strap soon just to swap it out when I feel like it.

  • @retrostu1
    @retrostu1 3 роки тому

    Dial is probably a bit too busy for me, but I do like the 3 hand dial version though.
    As for Quartz vs Automatic, I’m a mechanical design engineer so the automatic movements appeal more to me, but I wouldn’t say no to a nice quartz watch.
    (That and they don’t do automatic Casio and I do love a Casio!)

  • @mattede8744
    @mattede8744 3 роки тому

    As a person who has had Seiko dive watches ever since I left school and used them surfing, snorkelling and swimming, the one thing I didn't need to know, was the days date. I wish they would make a series of dive watches without date windows. My first and favourite is my quartz 7548-7000. I still use it and I can put it in a draw for a couple of months, come back and only have to change the bloody date.

  • @mediastarguest
    @mediastarguest 3 роки тому

    Great review, as usual.
    I'd like to add by two-bob's worth on the automatic v quartz movement debate.
    I prefer automatic but I don't mind quartz - each has its advantages and drawbacks.
    However, a 200m quartz diver which necessitates a standard 2 to 3 year battery change makes no sense - the first battery change will compromise the water resistance and a new seal will usually have to be fitted as well as tested - as will every other battery change.
    On the other hand, most mechanical watches will get away with having just one service every ten 10 years and are expensive and usually include the cost of a new seal.

    • @archibaldstokes
      @archibaldstokes 2 роки тому +1

      this is solar powered quartz so no need for changing batteries

  • @peterclark2618
    @peterclark2618 2 роки тому

    I love this watch. It should never need a battery and with an oil fill conversion, it will have more water resistance than any diver would ever need. I've already seen one UK price for £356 and that was just a quick look. I feel a project coming on.

  • @ozludo
    @ozludo 3 роки тому

    I solved the "dilemma" by getting one of each. I'm wearing the hulk right now. They are both super, but those recommended prices are insane. Halve them.
    I was surprised to discover they don't have interchangeable bracelets - the end links are different. I don't know if there are any fitted aftermarket options for the chrono. I would get a fitted rubber strap for it if I could.

  • @jefferyneu3915
    @jefferyneu3915 3 роки тому

    Nice review Jody. I have the blue model of this watch. I love it. It is always set and ready to go. At plus one second a week, it’s never more than a few seconds off when I pick it up. Yes, the date is the weakest part of the design. Maybe leaving the date ofd would have been the way to go on a tool diver. That said, most people will never dive with it, and a date is a very useful complication. Quartz doesn’t bother me at all, especially when it’s solar powered. They are reliable and seldom need any kind of attention. Of the six solar quartz watches I own, I have only had to service one of them, it needed a new capacitor. Now, I look forward to another decade of use with no servicing. I love being able to pick up a watch after not using it for several weeks and having it ready to wear, still accurate to a couple of seconds!

  • @kshithijsrinath
    @kshithijsrinath 2 роки тому

    Hey! Loved the review! Could you please let me know where you bought the watches from in Australia?

  • @1968jpy
    @1968jpy 3 роки тому

    Already being the owner of the SBDC033 Sumo/Blumo if I were to get a third generation Sumo it would probably be a chronograph quartz/solar . I’m not a fan of the third generation Sumo automatics . Thanks as always for a great video 👍🏻💯

  • @barryvercueil2346
    @barryvercueil2346 3 роки тому +1

    Incredible watch for the price. The solar is awesome. Could have been better without the chronograph function. Great video. Cheers.

  • @CUSTODIAN70
    @CUSTODIAN70 3 роки тому

    I buy cheap quartz watches (Casios preferably),as daily beaters.My favourites are mechanical,but I like solars,as well.Seiko do not make that many solars,but when they do,usually,they are goodlooking.As for the date window at 4o΄clοck,I agree,it appears strange,un-Seikolike.Atleast,Seiko could have chopped it off,in half,and in a vertical way,placing the date window inboard,right next to the index.Or,they could have eliminated the date window altogether...As always,very informative review.

  • @Blue_3rd
    @Blue_3rd 3 роки тому +1

    I thought you had given up on Seiko, mate 😊
    Anyway, nice vid. I like autos and quartz and wear both. Cheers!

  • @japudjuha
    @japudjuha 2 роки тому

    Awesome review Jody, Love my seikos, but boy they really are cranking up the prices something crazy.

  • @guymcredmond6463
    @guymcredmond6463 3 роки тому +1

    I bought a Seiko Solar Quartz SSC019P1. I liked the look, chronograph, pepsi bezel etc, so I didn't care that it was Quartz.
    Aside from really liking the look if it, and the specs, I can use it to set the time on all my other Autos when they run out of juice, as it's fantastically accurate!
    I do prefer the kind of tactile feel you get with automatic or mechanical watches. So I prefer them. But athletically wise, and functionality wise, if another Seiko Solar Quartz takes my fancy, I wouldn't gave any hesitation buying it.
    I also really love my Casio World Time. No doubt quartz watches still certainly have a place.

  • @internetretrogamedatabasei6838
    @internetretrogamedatabasei6838 2 роки тому

    Thx Jody starbuy got $429 today just order can’t decide between 101j or 103j (green sumo) really want to try 6R35 someday. Are you keeping both please share how you find the 6R thx Ton

  • @louielorenzo5121
    @louielorenzo5121 9 місяців тому

    I really like the blue solar version, on strap, the SSC759. It doesnt look messy to me. It's a really nice blue on blue. 😊

  • @andrewduckworth4720
    @andrewduckworth4720 3 роки тому

    Hi Jodie I have a very modest collection but have some excellent quartz watches the Tissot Chrono XL and Bulova Curve and Bulova buzz aldrin Apollo 11 special edition these watches are super accurate. I cannot afford an automatic watch which gets anywhere near the accuracy of the quartz and the "set and forget" characteristics are super convenient. I think you should help and review more alternative power watches. Keep up the good work ...love the vids

  • @trevbarlow9719
    @trevbarlow9719 3 роки тому

    Is Seikos QC better on their quartz pieces? I never hear complaints on their quartz, be it kinetic, solar or Astron.

  • @Marmots4reFun
    @Marmots4reFun 3 роки тому

    Thank you for this thoughtful and thorough review.

  • @TerrySteiner
    @TerrySteiner 3 роки тому

    A great review as always. This one is just not for me. I just prefer three handers. I do actually have three quartz cronos in my collection. A Nezumi Voiture, Bulova Sea King and a Detroit Mint Bullhead I picked up in a pawn shop. They just do not get much wrist time.

  • @JS-ev4xc
    @JS-ev4xc 3 роки тому +5

    I rem 3-4 yrs back I came across this series Pepsi color in a local mall, the shop has both guarantee and non-gurantee set. The latter costed only S$240 or A$240. I think Prospex logo was still not introduced for this model and was hardlex though.Those were the days, when SKX was on the rage, only 3-4yrs ago! Seiko what hv u done!

    • @LaberintoAzul
      @LaberintoAzul 3 роки тому +1

      I have the first generation has SOLAR in stead of Prospex. I had have it for 4 years and I beat it hard. No one regret, great lume , but. Price today is out of hand.

    • @NathanChisholm041
      @NathanChisholm041 3 роки тому +1

      I love the Prospex X

    • @JS-ev4xc
      @JS-ev4xc 3 роки тому

      @@NathanChisholm041 my bad, edited to Prospex. I kept remembering professional specification when I m typing Prospex which is what it wants to mean, leading to typo. c",)

  • @erickcastillo6427
    @erickcastillo6427 Рік тому

    Gorgeous quartz piece!!! Great review!!!🤜🤛

  • @ams914
    @ams914 3 роки тому +1

    If you think about what a watch is SUPPOSED to do, which is tell the time reliably and accurately with minimal fuss, it's hard to compete with solar quartz watches. I love the Citizen Skyhawk for that reason. Citizen Eco-drives in general are amazing, and the seconds hit the markers.

    • @wintermute8315
      @wintermute8315 Рік тому +1

      Who says that's what a watch is supposed to do, though?
      I could just as easily say a watch is supposed to look good on your wrist, or make you feel something when you look at it. To be a masculine stand-in for jewellery.
      They're not just about the time, are they.

  • @ForeverUnknowing
    @ForeverUnknowing 3 роки тому

    I love this watch, and for the money you paid I think it's an amazing bargain. With my smaller-than-seven-inches wrist, I've resisted the strong urge to purchase a Sumo or Sumo Chrono. I may have to just try it out and flip it if it's just not working for me.