@@GRINDxSHUBHAM 42 already delivered, and the Mk1A issues are due to problems due to America and NOT DUE TO US. Mk2 prototype will fly by late 2025. Things are not perfect but are way better than 99% of the countries. Making strategic bombers is a long term decision can take 15-20 years. Thinking now itself will get us such bombers.
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence. 2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships. 3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas. 4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets. 5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
@navneetkumarbhaskar618 He said that Hypersonic missile will be tested between 15 to 17 november.. And that LR LACM tested on Yesterday... That's not the reason
Jokes aside sir....the intro that u gave is exactly the reason why i started watching ur channel and other defense channels because main stream media doesn't cover important details and runs these kinds of news which are not relevant and not detailed...thank you for ur research and accurate defense news...jai hind
@@dhavalbhanushali-uh9ve In case of stealth bombers, speed doesn't matter. What matters is stealth, electronic warfare and network-centric warfare capabilities. What Sanjeet is saying, can be done with a further scaled up version of Ghatak UCAV (along with more refinements and improvements with the Dry Kaveri). It doesn't need to be supersonic, it only needs to have a better control laws and the abilities I have already mentioned. Good thing with Ghatak and SWIFT is that both are indigenous in true sense. Scaling up things shouldn't take much time time and herculean effort..
Tumhara sochna mera sochna bilkul ek haie subodh . Govt. Pahle hi clear kr chuki h ki requirement ke according UCAV ko scale up kiya ja sakta h . Fir ucav ka ground attack variant alag se banega similar computer laws hi scale up bomber m helpful rahenge . Bomber ki requirement navy ko hi hogi coz Indian sea route south china sea se Russa & uae saudi Israel se europe america tk hoga . Our apne shipment k protect karne ki capabilities possess karna must hoga .
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence. 2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships. 3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas. 4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets. 5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
All major world powers such as China, Russia, USA etc have strategic heavy bombers. India is making the ICBM and SSN submarine to become a global power. So India should also consider indicting heavy bombers in limited quantities to become a true global power.
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence. 2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships. 3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas. 4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets. 5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
We still have these bombers - TU95/TU142M 12 of them were retired recently they can be refurbished and reintroduced at reasonable cost and they can carry 10 cruise missiles for long distances in Indian ocean
Strategic bombers and normal bomb dropping mein jameen-asmaan ka farq hai.. normal bombing hamare jaguars bhi kar sakte hai, infact India uses jaguars gor specifically bombing
U always sounds more logical😊... I been learning, watching, studying defence technologies n planning since 1992 ... i realy feel ur more knowledgeable n sensible
At some point, India needs a plane of this class (rather than the much larger and more expensive Tu-160). But it needs to be stealth as air defence systems have become deadly for large aircraft. Perhaps propose starting work on a successor to the Tu-22M ?
India should buy 8 --Tu 22 M planes & 8--- Rockwell B-1 Lancer Supersonic Strategic aircraft For Indian defense Fans govt can atleast do this much either !!
Heavy background music = TRP = Paisa 🤑 Also 2:48 ye sab purchases aaj k conflicts k liye nahi, kal k conflicts ko dimag me leke kiya jata hai, aaj hamko agar dikh raha hai ki enemies sirf border k pass me hi hai, that doesn't mean that tomorrow also is going to be the same Kal ko west asia ya America me bhi ho sakte hai 😂 This difference in planning is the difference between India being a struggling country and China being a superpower
At any cost try to develop a supersonic stealth bomber jet with 4 newly developed AL31 engines in a mission mode. Once we succeed it'll change the overall scenario of Air force & Navy's striking abilities as well as it'll going to be a game changer machine for cross border terrorist operations. Jai Hind Jai Bharat Bharat Mata Ki Jai 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🏻
This is the first time your analysis has made 100 percent sense. Although your earlier videos were good but they only made sense upto 60 to 70 percent. Also, your analysis is mostly one or two dimensional but this video checks all the boxes. Good job 👏 👍
What is relevance of non stealth costly bombers with more and more effective radars and long range Air Defence system without proactive defence system to protect bombers from surface to air and long range Air to Air missiles. It is better for investing and acquiring long range cheaper stealth UAVs in large numbers. Now Indian Private sector can do this by expediting Kaveri MK-2 indigenous jet engine.
Well tu 160 navy ko Lena chaiye destroyer se Jada fast and defense Mai kafi acha rahega 12 brahmos carry karega to manpower Kam lagega and maintenance bhi kafi Kam rahega Navy ke liye ideal rahega
Indian Navy should acquire 2-4 tu 160 bomber ...and Airforce should better just focus on MRFA ,AMCA and other indigenous fighters Airforce ke liye squadron strength maintain krna aur firth gen fighter acquire krna hi abhi k time ek major issue h
Khudka bomber would be better always. And something like a fusion of TU 160 and a B 1 Lancer. That would be cool. We would have two different variants. One supersonic strategic heavy weight class another one stealth supersonic. America has like 3 different types of bombers: B1 and B52 (non-stealth), and B2 (stealth) soon B21 will be there. Russia has TU 22M, TU 160, TU 95, SU 34M. China has Xian H6, Xian JH7. We should have two atleast for building up pressure. Both either completely developed by India as one fusion of TU 160 and B1 Lancer. Or buy one from either Russia or America as both have been in offer. And one scaled up version of Ghatak. We definitely need it.
Admin bro one hypothetical question agr aapko IAF ke liye Tu22M3 or TU160 me se koi ek bomber choose karna pde to aap konsa bombers choos krna pasand kroge..
I see a few comments stating that India should use Kaveri engines to make its own bomber. And as much as i want India to have that capability, it is not gonna happen with Kaveri. Here is why: A single Tu 160 is powered by 4 x Kuznetsov NK-32 turbofan engines with 245 kN (55,100 lbF) each. 245 kN EACH. Let that sink in. A single Kaveri is capable of delivering 75 kN of dry thrust. It would take 4 Kaveri to get to the power output of 1 Kuznetsov NK-32 engine, and Tu 160 has 4 of them. We need a new family of very long range, light weight and high efficiency engines for our own bombers. India needs to ramp up of defence R&D budget to be able to achieve this goal. Jai Hind.
They are talking about making a bomber like B2, it has 4 engines with 85kn thrust each. In the coming years when Dry Kaveri will be integrated with new afterburner it may have a thrust of 80-85kn.
@viscousman i understand, but do remember to take into account that B2 is a STEALTH bomber. So what it lacks drastically in speed it makes up by staying undetected. And while we are working on radar absorbing materials, to my knowledge we are still in the R&D phase (correct me if I'm wrong). Prototyping followed by testing and then finally arriving to the stage where u can put it up on a full scale bomber, that is decades away.
Bharat ke kaam ka nahi at today's scenario....low cost high availability fighter f20 tigershark jaisa plane best hoga...latest upgrade aur safety features ke sath mig21 ka naya avatar bhi sahi hoga Bharat ke abhi ke situation ke liye
India needs MiG-31 for air launched hypersonic missiles. Having Tupolev-22M3 is not a bad idea, even though, the priority should be filling up the void in the squadron strength.
To buy any fighter planes bombers from Russia is a waste of $$ they need to be modified with latest elctronics like heads up etc etc etc Look at S400 for $5 billion what a waste of money DRDO cud have come up with similar system a 2-3 years ... Good analysis as always ..
Dr. Saheb vo Diding...diding...diding...diding karenge, tabhi to aap thaayen...thaayen karke unhe maarenge. Nahi karenge to kaise maarenge, bataaiye!? 😂😂😂
faltu media ke chakkar me hmm paisa barbad toh nhi karskte naa aabhi jarurat nhi phirbhi hmm apna bomber programme chalu hai so wait and watch by the india media bakwas hai pure din congress bjp chalta hai but ye nhi baat hoti ki govenment ki konsi schemes faeda deri hai ispe bhi dicussion ho by the way mujhe congress se koe umind nhi vo toh barbad hai but jisse umeed hai vo thoda abhi peeche hai but khosis kare so it is good instead of doing nothing.. like congress from past 60 years
The Navy needs submarines, AWACS, air to air refueling aircraft, 3rd aircraft carrier with aircrafts. Bomber has less priority compared to the mentioned things.
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence. 2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships. 3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas. 4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets. 5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
Aaj kal aapki video me content kamm and cribbing zyada dikhti hai sir. The quality is going down. Please logo ko blame karna band kar news delivery pe focus kare. 🙏
Stealthy ones has lots of limitations. For IOR 1sqdn of B1b(planned retiring) could be good option, with Ind modification, if Ind can negotiate with Trump.
Bruh America never sells its stealth fighters (except F-35), they haven't sold it to Europe and will never sell it to India, they have retired their 'nighthawk' but never sold it to anyone.
Instead of tu22 or tu160 it would be better we work on a stealth bomber possible increasing our ghatak design and work with russian(since they r also on that pak da) project.
Ha hame bomber aircraft ki requirement hai Means abhi ke liye name hame 8 bomber ki requirement hai ....... Hume bomber aircraft pak ke liye nahi ........ red land nation ke liye chahiye usaka main land area kafi bada hai so ......... yadi hame usake cities ko large numbers me target karna pade to fir missiles ke alawa bhi hamare pas aur bhi kuch options available hone chahiye .......... Yah to rahi 8 bomber fleet ki bat current senhario ke liye ...... ============================ But hum yadi 2035 ya 2040 ke bad ka indian fleet ko leke chal rahe hai tab us samy ke hisab se hamare pas max to max 4 ya 6 sqd isaka hona chahiye ......... red nation ke pas bhi itana hi hai ( yakeen na ho to wikipediakar lijiye u will understand what i actually trying said ...... ) But yah jo bhi 4 ya 6 new bomber aircraft squadron after 2035 shamil kiye jaye yah indiginiousaly india me bane with tech transfer and usaka jyada tar ammunition and engions bhi made in India ho with full tech transfer . Aur Jo bhi nation after 2035 hame full tech transfer ke sath bomber aircraft offer kare tab usake sath deal kiya Jaye fir vo uncle Sam nation ho ya fir Siberian bear nation it doest matter hamare liye bas india ke fleet me bomber aircraft hone chahiye after 2035 in large sqd number ...... And isake liye airforce ka and Navy ka joint coordinated team bhi banaya ja sakata jo ki in bomber aircraft ki fleet ko direction milane pe opration kar sake . Hamari jo airforce hai uski sub division ke tahat hume yah bomber aircraft operated fleet banani hogi ..... ============================ Hamare pas aur option kya hai yadi hum large bomber aircraft lena nahi chahate hai to :- 1) 160 Hercules aircraft se bhi hum cruise missile dag sakate hai in large number isake liye hame unko thoda modified karna hoga yah new tech uncle Sam ke pas hai unse hum bat kare to humne yah new tech milsakati hai ...... 2) ya fir hum jo hamara full scale ghatak ucav ban raha hai usi ko base banake ek naya fresh indiginious bomber aircraft project lunch kar sakate hai just like humane amca aircrafs ka aim rakh ke new project launch kiya tha same waise hi ...... ( but yaha problem yahi hai ki hal already busy hai amca, Tejas mk1 ,Tejas mk2 ,tedbf ko leke aur 2040 tak unke yahi projects chalate rahenge so ..... hum yadi indigious project ka soch bhi rahe hai tab bhi hame use 2040 me launch karna hoga and vo 2050 me jake complete hoga yadi burocratic and world political hurdles naaaye to and yadi world political hurdles aate hai tab to 2060 pakka hi samzo ..... 3) isi liye kaha tha abhi ke liye 8 bomber ka hum Socrates hai and after 2035 hum other nations se bomber air craft tech leke max 4 to 6 sqd hamare bade in future shamil kar lenege ...... ============================ But man lo after 2040 yadi hamare pas bade morden air craft ki fleet Horatio hai ya aircraft carrier fleet hojati hai tab bhi us siti me hame jyada show off nahi karna hai ...... Hame vo mistek repete nahi Karni hai jo red nation ne kiya hai ...... Hame bas 2055 ke bad ka hamara goal kya hai ( project akhand bharat ) usi ke hisab se act karna hoga until 2060 ya 2065. Ha mussels flexing hum kar sakate hai but kisake sath karna hai yah thoda soch ke karne wali bag hai France and UK bhi mussels flexing karte rahe hai in past but vo sirf satergic locations pe hi karte hai . Red nation ke jaisa nahi jo bhi bada nation mile usake sath shuru hojao nahi hame isi sho off se bachana hai ......... ============================
America may offers new B 21 stealth bomber to Allay country, so must offers to India. It's cheaper the B 2 , . Most imp these 5 Generation Stealth Bomber. It's can make chinaa in serious mode.
भारतीय सेना वोन को requirement का पता तभी चलता जब कोई kargil जैसा युद्ध हो,बगैर युद्ध के सोच समझकर Weapons अपने invwntory में रखना भारतीय सेना वन की बस की बात नहीं।
But bombers humare hi priority list mein kyu nhi hai ....... agar hota to shayad HAL bhi isey develop karne k liye kuch karta...... ab time aa gaya hai ki hume bhi bombers ko apni priority list mein lana chahiye....
Indian establishment is considering to develop a upscaled manned version of Ghatak as Stealthy supersonic bomber. This is ordinary & one day news will come that even Turkey/ South Korea are developing such projects. India needs to move ahead of curve by developing next generation project. Chinese were not masters in ICE engine cars & directly took lead in EV technology gaining Global leadership in the segment. So Indians must focus resources & energoes on next gen bomber. Indian DRDO is already in advanced stage of developing HGV and ISRO is also mastering manned space shuttle that can withstand extreme temperature at very high hypersonic velocity. Both these organizations can be deployed to work in collaboration to develop a new global first project based on fusion of technologies from these 2 projects to develop a Hypersonic space bomber with variable cycle engine that starts as conventional jet aircraft prior to gaining supersonic velocity, than switch to scramjet mode to reach outer atmosphere to fire missiles & rocket enabled munitions from space and even has dew/ miniaturised high powered lasers to target AWACS, radars, ADS batteries & stealthy fighters like F-35/F-22/J-20/J-35/SU-57/SU-75/Kaan etc. This will give India capability to hit hitech opponents & hit them really hard.
B2-Spirit uses 4 F110 engines
B21-Raider uses 2 F135 engines
We can create our own bombers using Kaveri engines.
Certainly
Ya and price of b2 bombers are also very low na sirf engine se kuch nahi hota bro yanha Tejas ban nahi pa rahe hai or tum bomber bhi bana lo
@@GRINDxSHUBHAM 42 already delivered, and the Mk1A issues are due to problems due to America and NOT DUE TO US.
Mk2 prototype will fly by late 2025.
Things are not perfect but are way better than 99% of the countries.
Making strategic bombers is a long term decision can take 15-20 years. Thinking now itself will get us such bombers.
Abhi Kaveri bn to jaaye phle
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence.
2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships.
3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas.
4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets.
5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
Ending part is accurate. Strategic bomber with Ghatak Ucav. Maybe with 4x dry kaveri or Even JV engine might be ready by then
yes
Hopefully Aisa hi hona chahiye
Why you didn't made any Video about the Maiden test flight of LR LACM...??
*_Bcuz he thought hypersonic missile will be test_*
@navneetkumarbhaskar618 He said that Hypersonic missile will be tested between 15 to 17 november..
And that LR LACM tested on Yesterday...
That's not the reason
@@AbinashMalana that is normal news bro views kase aye ga
@@saurabhsrivastv Bro Maiden test flight tha...
Video toh Ban ni chahiye thi
@@saurabhsrivastv Not normal news it is mission mode project
Jokes aside sir....the intro that u gave is exactly the reason why i started watching ur channel and other defense channels because main stream media doesn't cover important details and runs these kinds of news which are not relevant and not detailed...thank you for ur research and accurate defense news...jai hind
Stealth bomber with 4 kaveri engine 🥰
In dream
@@dhavalbhanushali-uh9ve Saatve aasman me udega😂😂
@@dhavalbhanushali-uh9ve In case of stealth bombers, speed doesn't matter. What matters is stealth, electronic warfare and network-centric warfare capabilities. What Sanjeet is saying, can be done with a further scaled up version of Ghatak UCAV (along with more refinements and improvements with the Dry Kaveri). It doesn't need to be supersonic, it only needs to have a better control laws and the abilities I have already mentioned. Good thing with Ghatak and SWIFT is that both are indigenous in true sense. Scaling up things shouldn't take much time time and herculean effort..
@@suryasingh9110 7 Aasman kiya hai?
@@prabuddhaghosh2405 their brain is not enough developed to understand these things
diding diding diding diding😂😂😂😂😂
😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I watch this clip thrice just for that !
Tiding Tiding Tiding Tiding !
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Followed by
Pehle Puri Baat to Samajh lo
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Same here @@batikopssj3557
🤣🤣🤣
Jai Shree Radhe Krishna 🙏🙏🧡
Jai Bharat Rashtra 🙏🙏🧡
I understand Alpha Defense frustration from main stream media , that's way for defense news trust you
Tupolev Tu-22 Backfire....... goosebumps
Tumhara sochna mera sochna bilkul ek haie subodh . Govt. Pahle hi clear kr chuki h ki requirement ke according UCAV ko scale up kiya ja sakta h . Fir ucav ka ground attack variant alag se banega similar computer laws hi scale up bomber m helpful rahenge . Bomber ki requirement navy ko hi hogi coz Indian sea route south china sea se Russa & uae saudi Israel se europe america tk hoga . Our apne shipment k protect karne ki capabilities possess karna must hoga .
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence.
2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships.
3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas.
4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets.
5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
Don't Get Excited Guys 😂😂
Only Offers... No Purchases...
1:00 you talking about Media...
Is it really exist in Bharat 🤔
Ofc it does!
All major world powers such as China, Russia, USA etc have strategic heavy bombers.
India is making the ICBM and SSN submarine to become a global power. So India should also consider indicting heavy bombers in limited quantities to become a true global power.
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence.
2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships.
3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas.
4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets.
5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
Your holistic analysis not only debunks the mainstream media but also provides a realistic perspective to your viewers. Thanks a ton 👍🏼
We still have these bombers - TU95/TU142M 12 of them were retired recently they can be refurbished and reintroduced at reasonable cost and they can carry 10 cruise missiles for long distances in Indian ocean
Bhai bomber useful hi india phele bhi use kar chuke hi.
Strategic bombers and normal bomb dropping mein jameen-asmaan ka farq hai.. normal bombing hamare jaguars bhi kar sakte hai, infact India uses jaguars gor specifically bombing
@@peacefulmind6051strategic bombers ho ya normal dono hone chahiye india ki pass iss si attack strategy ki wide spectrum khul jayega.
U always sounds more logical😊... I been learning, watching, studying defence technologies n planning since 1992 ... i realy feel ur more knowledgeable n sensible
😂Seema Haider 😂😂 Pani Piya ki nahin. Usse to badhiya hi chalaya🎉🎉🎉
Indian media- hum log srif hindu Muslim karte hai baki news bekar hai 😂😂😂
Islam is dangerous for mankind
Well can u trust Muslims
Just look in Bangladesh Bengali Hindu
Amazing analysis, never thought about Indian Navy operating bombers
A very potent platform Tu-22M3, in my opinion.
Not really something that we NEED, but would be wonderful if it can be leveraged
I agree with your point. Also, I like your objection to noisy background music.
At some point, India needs a plane of this class (rather than the much larger and more expensive Tu-160).
But it needs to be stealth as air defence systems have become deadly for large aircraft.
Perhaps propose starting work on a successor to the Tu-22M ?
What about our own flying wing bomber like B2?
Bharat koa jald TU 22M2 Bomber procure karna chahiye. ......Missile lunch faciliates key saath. ...
Russian planes looks beautiful ❤️❤️ Su57,35,30,27,24 Mig29,35,31 Tu22,160 ❤
🇮🇳🤝🇷🇺 tu 160m 8 & tu 22 m3 8 navel & airforce 🇷🇺🤝🇮🇳 👍🙏🌏💪 Jai Hind Jai Bharat ♥️
I totally agree with you this main stream media people have no info about defence
India should buy
8 --Tu 22 M planes &
8--- Rockwell B-1 Lancer Supersonic Strategic aircraft
For Indian defense Fans govt can atleast do this much either !!
Heavy background music = TRP = Paisa 🤑
Also 2:48 ye sab purchases aaj k conflicts k liye nahi, kal k conflicts ko dimag me leke kiya jata hai, aaj hamko agar dikh raha hai ki enemies sirf border k pass me hi hai, that doesn't mean that tomorrow also is going to be the same
Kal ko west asia ya America me bhi ho sakte hai 😂
This difference in planning is the difference between India being a struggling country and China being a superpower
At any cost try to develop a supersonic stealth bomber jet with 4 newly developed AL31 engines in a mission mode. Once we succeed it'll change the overall scenario of Air force & Navy's striking abilities as well as it'll going to be a game changer machine for cross border terrorist operations. Jai Hind Jai Bharat Bharat Mata Ki Jai 🇮🇳🇮🇳🇮🇳🙏🏻
This is the first time your analysis has made 100 percent sense. Although your earlier videos were good but they only made sense upto 60 to 70 percent.
Also, your analysis is mostly one or two dimensional but this video checks all the boxes.
Good job 👏 👍
❤
Well bombers are not waste or not needed they can carry way way more arsenal and payload than any other fighters.
Indian News Channel without fancy BG music is inevitable😂😂😂
Diding diding diding Chuun Chuun Sunn Sunn😂
What is relevance of non stealth costly bombers with more and more effective radars and long range Air Defence system without proactive defence system to protect bombers from surface to air and long range Air to Air missiles. It is better for investing and acquiring long range cheaper stealth UAVs in large numbers. Now Indian Private sector can do this by expediting Kaveri MK-2 indigenous jet engine.
Yes people dont understand, how desperately India needs to Fabricate THE chip.
Yeh media walli baat bilkul sahi kahi aap ne 😂
Well tu 160 navy ko Lena chaiye destroyer se Jada fast and defense Mai kafi acha rahega 12 brahmos carry karega to manpower Kam lagega and maintenance bhi kafi Kam rahega
Navy ke liye ideal rahega
Thank you so much for logical analysis.
Indian Navy should acquire 2-4 tu 160 bomber ...and Airforce should better just focus on MRFA ,AMCA and other indigenous fighters
Airforce ke liye squadron strength maintain krna aur firth gen fighter acquire krna hi abhi k time ek major issue h
Khudka bomber would be better always.
And something like a fusion of TU 160 and a B 1 Lancer. That would be cool. We would have two different variants. One supersonic strategic heavy weight class another one stealth supersonic.
America has like 3 different types of bombers: B1 and B52 (non-stealth), and B2 (stealth) soon B21 will be there. Russia has TU 22M, TU 160, TU 95, SU 34M. China has Xian H6, Xian JH7.
We should have two atleast for building up pressure. Both either completely developed by India as one fusion of TU 160 and B1 Lancer. Or buy one from either Russia or America as both have been in offer. And one scaled up version of Ghatak. We definitely need it.
Always informative & to the point👏🏻
Admin bro one hypothetical question agr aapko IAF ke liye Tu22M3 or TU160 me se koi ek bomber choose karna pde to aap konsa bombers choos krna pasand kroge..
I see a few comments stating that India should use Kaveri engines to make its own bomber. And as much as i want India to have that capability, it is not gonna happen with Kaveri. Here is why:
A single Tu 160 is powered by 4 x Kuznetsov NK-32 turbofan engines with 245 kN (55,100 lbF) each.
245 kN EACH.
Let that sink in.
A single Kaveri is capable of delivering 75 kN of dry thrust.
It would take 4 Kaveri to get to the power output of 1 Kuznetsov NK-32 engine, and Tu 160 has 4 of them.
We need a new family of very long range, light weight and high efficiency engines for our own bombers.
India needs to ramp up of defence R&D budget to be able to achieve this goal.
Jai Hind.
They are talking about making a bomber like B2, it has 4 engines with 85kn thrust each. In the coming years when Dry Kaveri will be integrated with new afterburner it may have a thrust of 80-85kn.
@viscousman i understand, but do remember to take into account that B2 is a STEALTH bomber. So what it lacks drastically in speed it makes up by staying undetected. And while we are working on radar absorbing materials, to my knowledge we are still in the R&D phase (correct me if I'm wrong). Prototyping followed by testing and then finally arriving to the stage where u can put it up on a full scale bomber, that is decades away.
Media Headlines should be like 2050 tak Indian Airforce mein Shamil Hoga TU 22 bomber....China mein darr ka mahol. 🤣😜
😂😂😂😂👍 bro you are pure indian media
😂😂
India should buy few of these for Indian Navy and 2 for DRDO.
जो भी लो रूसी ही लो अमेरिकन तो कभी नहीं
Is category me russia ke alawa koi banata bhi nhi
Agreed.
@@Vartik-jr4qr
I think, You forget about bones.
@@Vartik-jr4qrB1 Lancer Rockwell USA Strategic aircraft
@@couragecowardly3741 poor speed and payload
IAF be like : Hum bas sanyas lunga aur kuch nahi 🤡
Bharat ke kaam ka nahi at today's scenario....low cost high availability fighter f20 tigershark jaisa plane best hoga...latest upgrade aur safety features ke sath mig21 ka naya avatar bhi sahi hoga Bharat ke abhi ke situation ke liye
India needs MiG-31 for air launched hypersonic missiles. Having Tupolev-22M3 is not a bad idea, even though, the priority should be filling up the void in the squadron strength.
Bomber videos give the feelings of the famous terminator movie dialogue that Im back😂
To buy any fighter planes bombers from Russia is a waste of $$ they need to be modified with latest elctronics like heads up etc etc etc Look at S400 for $5 billion what a waste of money DRDO cud have come up with similar system a 2-3 years ... Good analysis as always ..
tiding tiding tiding "Tu-22 banega Pakistan aur China ka kal" tiding tiding tiding 😂😂😂
China kaap raha thar thar ,
Kim Jong bhi jisse daar Gaya
Woh hai Tupluv hai 😂😂
@couragecowardly3741 🤣🤣🤣
4.00 you just say my words that i repeating for 1 year
Dr. Saheb vo Diding...diding...diding...diding karenge, tabhi to aap thaayen...thaayen karke unhe maarenge.
Nahi karenge to kaise maarenge, bataaiye!?
😂😂😂
Big bro I concerned china makes 6th generation aircrafts, In Zuhai airshow china displays it, plz make video in this topic .
Modi ji aapse parthana hai ki 5-6 Bomber kharid hi lo....nahin to media wale paka k marenge....😂
faltu media ke chakkar me hmm paisa barbad toh nhi karskte naa aabhi jarurat nhi phirbhi hmm apna bomber programme chalu hai so wait and watch by the india media bakwas hai pure din congress bjp chalta hai but ye nhi baat hoti ki govenment ki konsi schemes faeda deri hai ispe bhi dicussion ho by the way mujhe congress se koe umind nhi vo toh barbad hai but jisse umeed hai vo thoda abhi peeche hai but khosis kare so it is good instead of doing nothing.. like congress from past 60 years
Heavy background music was osum😅
I had imagined this very idea about scaling up the Ghatak into a bomber like B2.
Indian news channels headlines are very cheap 😂
The Navy needs submarines, AWACS, air to air refueling aircraft, 3rd aircraft carrier with aircrafts. Bomber has less priority compared to the mentioned things.
Ghatak UCAV can be a perfect strategic and stealthy Bomber, if scaled up..
1 remember, the enemy has super large navy, also has long-range bombers and very large fleet of submarines. Imagine China from east side and Pakistan and its allies from west side collectively send 300-400 ships along with aircraft carriers and large fleet of submarines and launch air onshore on surface and submarine attack on our forces simultaneously. How our Navy/naval air force/air force will survive. We don’t want one More repeatation of battle of talaKota against Vijaynagar versus surrounding Sultanate. Defeat because of overconfidence.
2 One strategic bomber I believe, is much better option than to keep 4-5 naval ships because you need to keep large number of people to operate a ship like destroyer/carrier/frigate etc. To undertake any medium or long-range mission these ships will take some days, and need lot of fuel/food and other things to maintain a military ship. And these ships can easily easily be destroyed by modern cruise missiles. In future it will be even more easier to destroy naval ships.
3 whereas a long-range bomber jet can carry large number of missiles sometimes even ICBM also. It also does not require very large number of people to operate. And can accomplish any long-range mission within few hours only. In above scenario of our arm forces facing very large naval attack, it will not be naval fleet but this kind of jets can play critical role in destroying entire attack at once bye keeping them far away from our areas.
4 considering very large forces of China and also future scenario of maybe other big powers also turning against India on any pretext of human rights etc, we need to have long range strike capabilities with long-range bombers with stand of weaponry. For that we need to place very large order of Tu 160 and parkda type of jets.
5 we need them in large numbers because their availability ratio is generally very less and we require MRO facility in India, And secondly each Jet is envisaged fight against 3-4 naval ships or enemy land targets.
Aaj kal aapki video me content kamm and cribbing zyada dikhti hai sir. The quality is going down. Please logo ko blame karna band kar news delivery pe focus kare. 🙏
1:03 exactly that's why I don't watch news channel 😂
If bombers are useless Then why china has bombers 😂😂
Same logic was earlier used for drones, saying drones are not useful in military warfare by Indian military analyst.
Fused bulb
Same goes for US. They even today use stratofortress
For Pacific region and America
Those bombers are useful only if your enemies don't advance missiles. But if your enemies are Chinese and Pakistanis it's useless 😅
Ab stealth bombers ka jamana aa gaya hai,ye purane jamane ke bomber dushman ki air defence ka nishana ban jate hai.
can Indian IAF transport as a cruse missile launcher like USA by looking at it, It was not complicated correct me if i am wrong BTW love your videos.
Indian Navy might need it💥
Love your video bro please make videos on IAF frequently
Stealthy ones has lots of limitations. For IOR 1sqdn of B1b(planned retiring) could be good option, with Ind modification, if Ind can negotiate with Trump.
Bruh America never sells its stealth fighters (except F-35), they haven't sold it to Europe and will never sell it to India, they have retired their 'nighthawk' but never sold it to anyone.
Bhaiya please ficv vs frcv( project ranjit) vs fmbt (arjun) ko 2024 and onwards ke hisaab se explain kare 🙏
Bhai humse aircraft to bana nahi tum kahan bomber banwaa rahe hi😂😂
Sir hamari media news par dhayan nahi deti sirf trp par dhyan deti aur mrp par😅😅😅😅😅
Diding .....diding ....😂😂😂
Very Funny video brother 😁
Instead of tu22 or tu160 it would be better we work on a stealth bomber possible increasing our ghatak design and work with russian(since they r also on that pak da) project.
0:57 😂😂😂
Bhai, waiting for your LRLACM vedio
Ha hame bomber aircraft ki requirement hai
Means abhi ke liye name hame 8 bomber ki requirement hai ....... Hume bomber aircraft pak ke liye nahi ........ red land nation ke liye chahiye usaka main land area kafi bada hai so ......... yadi hame usake cities ko large numbers me target karna pade to fir missiles ke alawa bhi hamare pas aur bhi kuch options available hone chahiye ..........
Yah to rahi 8 bomber fleet ki bat current senhario ke liye ......
============================
But hum yadi 2035 ya 2040 ke bad ka indian fleet ko leke chal rahe hai tab us samy ke hisab se hamare pas max to max 4 ya 6 sqd isaka hona chahiye ......... red nation ke pas bhi itana hi hai ( yakeen na ho to wikipediakar lijiye u will understand what i actually trying said ...... )
But yah jo bhi 4 ya 6 new bomber aircraft squadron after 2035 shamil kiye jaye yah indiginiousaly india me bane with tech transfer and usaka jyada tar ammunition and engions bhi made in India ho with full tech transfer .
Aur Jo bhi nation after 2035 hame full tech transfer ke sath bomber aircraft offer kare tab usake sath deal kiya Jaye fir vo uncle Sam nation ho ya fir Siberian bear nation it doest matter hamare liye bas india ke fleet me bomber aircraft hone chahiye after 2035 in large sqd number ......
And isake liye airforce ka and Navy ka joint coordinated team bhi banaya ja sakata jo ki in bomber aircraft ki fleet ko direction milane pe opration kar sake .
Hamari jo airforce hai uski sub division ke tahat hume yah bomber aircraft operated fleet banani hogi .....
============================
Hamare pas aur option kya hai yadi hum large bomber aircraft lena nahi chahate hai to :-
1) 160 Hercules aircraft se bhi hum cruise missile dag sakate hai in large number isake liye hame unko thoda modified karna hoga yah new tech uncle Sam ke pas hai unse hum bat kare to humne yah new tech milsakati hai ......
2) ya fir hum jo hamara full scale ghatak ucav ban raha hai usi ko base banake ek naya fresh indiginious bomber aircraft project lunch kar sakate hai just like humane amca aircrafs ka aim rakh ke new project launch kiya tha same waise hi ......
( but yaha problem yahi hai ki hal already busy hai amca, Tejas mk1 ,Tejas mk2 ,tedbf ko leke aur 2040 tak unke yahi projects chalate rahenge so ..... hum yadi indigious project ka soch bhi rahe hai tab bhi hame use 2040 me launch karna hoga and vo 2050 me jake complete hoga yadi burocratic and world political hurdles naaaye to and yadi world political hurdles aate hai tab to 2060 pakka hi samzo .....
3) isi liye kaha tha abhi ke liye 8 bomber ka hum Socrates hai and after 2035 hum other nations se bomber air craft tech leke max 4 to 6 sqd hamare bade in future shamil kar lenege ......
============================
But man lo after 2040 yadi hamare pas bade morden air craft ki fleet Horatio hai ya aircraft carrier fleet hojati hai tab bhi us siti me hame jyada show off nahi karna hai ......
Hame vo mistek repete nahi Karni hai jo red nation ne kiya hai ......
Hame bas 2055 ke bad ka hamara goal kya hai ( project akhand bharat ) usi ke hisab se act karna hoga until 2060 ya 2065.
Ha mussels flexing hum kar sakate hai but kisake sath karna hai yah thoda soch ke karne wali bag hai France and UK bhi mussels flexing karte rahe hai in past but vo sirf satergic locations pe hi karte hai .
Red nation ke jaisa nahi jo bhi bada nation mile usake sath shuru hojao nahi hame isi sho off se bachana hai .........
============================
This shows how deeply russian lobby is rooted in Indian defence system
What im thinking just few hours ago indian bomber with 4 Kaveri engine
You said it same 😅😅
What a coincidence
TU-160 offer and now TU-22 offer..Very soon we will have a UFO offer as well..😂
Good Opt for Indian Navy... SWIFT UCAV
Even doordarshan covered this bomber news along with lrashm
If we could use use rapid dragon system on upcoming MTA aircraft such as A400 ...Then it will be a game changer as well as budget friendly..
Canada 🤣 is very far away Nak 👃 PAKORAA G we need tu160 for that purpose and upcoming Pak da 😂😂😂
Sahi kaha bomber Navy ke liye achha rahega.
Aur bomber ke option ke liye SU-34 sahi rahega
F 15E strike eagle is better
@soumyajitsingha9614 wo bhangar iske samne nahi tikega. Hard point kam hai aur radar bhi catch kar lega aasani se
Tu-22 Banega kaal 🤣🤣🤣🔥
Tu-160 or white swan is just wowhhh.
admin Aja editor Ke pure maje late Huye. 🤣🤣🤣
America may offers new B 21 stealth bomber to Allay country, so must offers to India. It's cheaper the B 2 , . Most imp these 5 Generation Stealth Bomber. It's can make chinaa in serious mode.
We will never ever go for bombers..fighters ka thikana nai bombers kahan se lenge
Bhaiya 🙋MATANGI usv par video banaye and can it be useful and how
This is need now........fir both IAF and Indian Navy
Bhai lekin ghatak UCAV ki timeline kya hain? Kabse sunn rahe hain
भारतीय सेना वोन को requirement का पता तभी चलता जब कोई kargil जैसा युद्ध हो,बगैर युद्ध के सोच समझकर Weapons अपने invwntory में रखना भारतीय सेना वन की बस की बात नहीं।
But bombers humare hi priority list mein kyu nhi hai ....... agar hota to shayad HAL bhi isey develop karne k liye kuch karta...... ab time aa gaya hai ki hume bhi bombers ko apni priority list mein lana chahiye....
Indian establishment is considering to develop a upscaled manned version of Ghatak as Stealthy supersonic bomber. This is ordinary & one day news will come that even Turkey/ South Korea are developing such projects. India needs to move ahead of curve by developing next generation project. Chinese were not masters in ICE engine cars & directly took lead in EV technology gaining Global leadership in the segment. So Indians must focus resources & energoes on next gen bomber. Indian DRDO is already in advanced stage of developing HGV and ISRO is also mastering manned space shuttle that can withstand extreme temperature at very high hypersonic velocity. Both these organizations can be deployed to work in collaboration to develop a new global first project based on fusion of technologies from these 2 projects to develop a Hypersonic space bomber with variable cycle engine that starts as conventional jet aircraft prior to gaining supersonic velocity, than switch to scramjet mode to reach outer atmosphere to fire missiles & rocket enabled munitions from space and even has dew/ miniaturised high powered lasers to target AWACS, radars, ADS batteries & stealthy fighters like F-35/F-22/J-20/J-35/SU-57/SU-75/Kaan etc. This will give India capability to hit hitech opponents & hit them really hard.
abhi engine dev aur amca pe focus krna chahiye, warna itne projects start hue toh koi bhi complete nhi hoga,mrfa bhi bach rha hai abhi
😂😂 main stream media jokes se jyada kuchh nahin dikhata..