Розмір відео: 1280 X 720853 X 480640 X 360
Показувати елементи керування програвачем
Автоматичне відтворення
Автоповтор
Thank you very much for posting these. The explanations are very clear and thorough.
Well done, you just clarify a concept that was impossibile to understand through the book.
since it's a sample raw moment, shouldn't it be 1/n summation of __ from i=1 to n? rather than N?
Thank you for your explanationBut a little remark I think that in sample notation you should put n in small letter
Why in the third moment condition, the estimator is consistent, but biased? How do we understand that?
In this situation, is the method of moments the same as the MLE?
Thank you very much for posting these. The explanations are very clear and thorough.
Well done, you just clarify a concept that was impossibile to understand through the book.
since it's a sample raw moment, shouldn't it be 1/n summation of __ from i=1 to n? rather than N?
Thank you for your explanation
But a little remark I think that in sample notation you should put n in small letter
Why in the third moment condition, the estimator is consistent, but biased? How do we understand that?
In this situation, is the method of moments the same as the MLE?