Judge declares mistrial in Karen Read murder case
Вставка
- Опубліковано 30 чер 2024
- After jurors in Karen Read murder trial were deadlocked, Judge Beverly Cannone declared a mistrial on Monday afternoon.
turnto10.com/news/local/delib...
#karenread #trial #mistrial #massachusetts #dedham
-----
NBC 10 WJAR is Southern New England's leading news station, covering news, politics, sports and weather in Rhode Island, Southeastern Massachusetts and Eastern Connecticut, including Providence, Central Falls, Cranston, East Providence, Newport, Pawtucket, Warwick, Woonsocket, Attleboro, Fall River, New Bedford, Taunton and Cape Cod, and surrounding communities.
Our homepage is turnto10.com
Like us on Facebook at / nbc10
Follow us on X at x.com/nbc10
Follow us on Instagram at / nbc10wjar
Download the NBC 10 News app for iOS at
apps.apple.com/us/app/nbc-10-...
Download the NBC 10 News app for Android at
play.google.com/store/apps/de...
Report news to NBC 10 at 401-455-9105 or email news@wjar.com
Share your images and video with NBC 10 at turnto10.com/chimein
12 people will never find her guilty. Waisted time and money.
unless if they are bought and paid for by the mccabe, the mcalberts, mc higgins, and aunt bev.
Thank gawd!!!! Now investigate the whole corrupt Canton Police Department!!
also jurors?
@NoH2O4U why? Because they didn't let her off, retrial and lock her up
@@charding0chcongratulations, I can only imagine how much courage it takes to go on social media and celebrate your ignorance, well done 👍
Corruption at the highest level. Shameful!
😮 HALLELUJAH 🙏 I'm so happy, the evidence just didn't add up. That police department should be ashamed with themselves. PERIOD.
"NOT GUILTY".................THIS CROOKED JUDGE GAVE THE JURORS A FORM THAT DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION OF "NOT GUILTY" ON IT. SO THIS IS A MISTRIAL BECAUSE OF THIS CROOKED CORRUPT JUDGE.....................REMOVE HER.
Those hanging on to their Correct belief of NOT GUILTY, you have Integrity!
@@jeanettecoleman-mz7ie Or, stubborn.
"NOT GUILTY".................THIS CROOKED JUDGE GAVE THE JURORS A FORM THAT DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION OF "NOT GUILTY" ON IT. SO THIS IS A MISTRIAL BECAUSE OF THIS CROOKED CORRUPT JUDGE.....................REMOVE HER.
With so much "reasonable doubt," how is this possible??
It's somewhat like Stockholm syndrome. Alot of people in America do not want to admit they are living under tyrannical government and when people are given the opportunity to perform for their master they really truly belief especially juries that the State never makes mistakes, and they would not suffer from the same problems people do. They just refuse to accept the country is in a shit storm cause that would mean they have been fooled and no one wants to admit they are a victim. They all want to think they are heroes and main characters.
The judge was in the back pocket of the persecution
I'm sure we'll find out soon that one member was just a "Thin Blue Line" diehard supporter who couldn't possibly accept that all of those officials were lying.
.THIS CROOKED JUDGE GAVE THE JURORS A FORM THAT DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION OF "NOT GUILTY" ON IT. SO THIS IS A MISTRIAL BECAUSE OF THIS CROOKED CORRUPT JUDGE.....................REMOVE HER.
That is why I refuse jury duty, all that time, effort, money, wasted on corruption…… You know corruption have to put on a façade to make it look real?????🙄
Keep loving the government
The Jury, I believe are afraid of what they would live through if a verdict of Not Guilty was determined. The police brotherhood is very strong. This would bring vendettas against her and those whom have supported her.
I’m truly glad that Karen Read can move forward now with her life and fight to find justice for John I’Keefe 🙏
Commonwealth says they want to retrial her
She has to go through another trial ~ which indeed might find her guilty. So, what exactly do you mean
@@Alllieelliemaybe yes maybe no. Depending on her lawyers. They may very well come out stronger
98% sure this is another corrupt judge
SHE IS THE ALBERTS' FRIEND. EVERYONE KNOWS THAT............AND THERE WAS A DISPUTE IN THAT JUROR FORM BECAUSE THEY DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION TO CHECK "NOT GUILTY" ON THAT FORM.
@@brettcantrell8650 it's the standard form... it was alt charges they would have to find her guilty of to check those boxes in the first place so what is the point of having a not guilty checkbox next to those charges... also check your keyboard capslock is stuck
@@wynwilliams6977 oh so the standard form does not have a "not guilty" option? What nonsense!
@@brettcantrell8650 No, on the lesser charges they can decide on IE manslaughter instead of murder it does not have not guilty only a guilty box as you would only use it if you thought they were guilty of manslaughter not murder
@@wynwilliams6977 but there has to be an option of "not guilty". It's a multiple choice. Person can be either guilty or not guilty. Sh is either guilty of manslaughter or not guilty. And having watched the entire case, she is not guilty. So it is absolutely corrupt that the judge gave a from that does not have that option.
So why didn't the jury Foreman put in his fancy articulate letter? More specifically that they were only hung on one of the three charges, but they had come to unanimous decision of not guilty on the other two. That was the foreman of the juries lack. He should have been more specific in his letter. What a waste of time and money
Shes something else
How long does it take to die in the cold
Only idiots and cop haters think she's not guilty
Are you kidding? Entire case was full of reasonable doubt regardless of what side you believe. She is unlikeable, and probably not a great person, bur the conduct and the character of so many state witnesses was horrendous@
Blame it on the dirty cops
Only idiots do not realize the technology- she was a friend to karen * karen called her* and karen shrewedly asked people to do stuff for her. Jen googled this at karens request when karen ran to his snow covered body
@valiakloeppel7252 If so then why did Jen first Google that at 230am, delete it and then Google twice more 3 hours later?
@@bobwoolley5849if you think cases come without mistakes and the need to critically think through conflicting evidence you would be mistaken.
You should learn how to be a judge Take some lessons from judge Hayes of Tenn Similar case yet he asked his jurors who were deadlocked if they came tk a vertic in any of the charges Inlike you Bev too much in a hurry to
Go home And now Lally wants tk
Charge her twice Call in the jury Karen has rights Unconstitutional to be tried twice! Jury had vertics
It's supposed to be your belief in the constitution not your individual principals
Hos long ti Aunt Bev gits investigated
I knew it would be a mistrial. But I believe she is as guilty as the day she was born. I hope the 2nd trial will be able to find her guilty.
Agree, but i think Prosecuter should stick to lesser charges.
@@valiakloeppel7252Respectfully, I disagree, I think they meet intent.
@@user-es9tj4xw5t Agree, but evidence is so botched up - difficult to prove. And, i dont think it was premeditated.
@@user-es9tj4xw5t WHAT WAS THE INTENT?
There as no direct evidence, the main evidence was a tiny piece of tail light the same cop who wrote abusive messages about her in the first days after it happened magically found three weeks later... cops killed him and set her up
Respect to judge Beverley 👏👏✊✊❤️❤️
TRUMP 2024
Ew
Really feel for Karen she’s innocent 💞🩷big cover-up