How China became the biggest polluter and source of renewable energy at the same time | DW News
Вставка
- Опубліковано 4 гру 2023
- China's climate story is a contradiction. On one hand, it produces more emissions than any other country, by far. But it’s also investing significantly more in renewable energy than anyone else. How do these two extreme positions come together?
#china #pollution #renewableenergy
Subscribe: ua-cam.com/users/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
You can't outsource production of stuff to China and then complain about higher emissions, you are also outsourcing the emissions.
Spot on.
Not if China maintains international standards and regulations. Their an environmental nightmare in every facet. It's a shame to say, but China is very far from being a first world country.
And do you think a production place that produces the same thing in the US and China will have the same amount of emissions even if they produce the same amount of goods?
@@inotaishu1think about it, chian has a popultion of 3.5x of the US, and China produce more than 30% of world products, so double of energy or co2 is very reasonable
The biggest polluter is the West so far based on accumulative emission since industrialisation and per capita! DW is shameless to put such subject!
China emission per capita is only half of US emission per capita. China per person produce much less CO2 emission than developed countries per person.
They won't bat an eye on per capita cuz it doesnt make china look bad.
Exactly
who says CHINA, ? You believe a country like China is like believing pinocchio.
And do you know how this data comes to be?
Yeah only, but that doesnt change the fact that China isn't the biggest polluter by far. Totals DO matter
With germany currently getting 50% electricity from coal, we really shouldnt be judging
... from the coal power plants that were closed and only re-opened temporarily to meet the energy deficit that Russia's war has caused. Meanwhile China is getting that Russian gas (that German's no longer have access to) at massive discounts, and even despite that still choose to build more coal power plants that are way more pollutant than gas ones. Hard to see how one couldn't judge this 🤔
@@SloeJuice why you think China could replace German to get the discount gas from Russian? there are no new gas pipes built during last 2 years, how they can get this gas if there are no pipes to transport. furthermore, if China can get the discount Russia gas, why the domestic gas price is so high in China?
This news headline is unreasonable. China has a large population. If the same number of people consume energy, the US would definitely rank first in pollution emissions in the world.
Not only in China Renewable. I have 50 Solar Panels made in China in Groningen Nederland. Energy independent for 12 Years. Thank You China 👍
Just the forest fires lasting all year long in Canada render all the reduction of carbon emissions by CN in vain. What's the point of China doing that if the western countries don't want to change their costly way of living... the whole world should take the climate mitigating thing seriously not just blaming CN ...
let's start with turning off the lights in day time
DW should indicate in this video which are the old images from China 20 or 10 years ago and which are the images from 2023. It’s just misleading to put old and new images and videos together.
I think what DW wanted to do is misleading audience
but that won't make china look bad
Serpentza and laowhy86 are doing the same thing, posting same old videos again and again to keep their channel alive.
Misleading and deceptive is the entire point of German regime media! (DW is funded in whole or in part by the German government)
DW is just a subsidiary of the US media smear campaign.
Do your own manufacturing and see how clean your country's air will be.
CO2 emission per capita 2022 (tonnes per person, from Our World in Data)
7 Canada 18.72
8 Brunei 18.01
9 Gibraltar 17.59
10 Luxembourg 17.39
11 Bahrain 17.35
12 Australia 17.15
14 Saudi Arabia 15.47
15 United States 15.32
19 South Korea 11.77
20 Taiwan 11.73
26 Japan 9.76
27 Netherlands 9.54
28 Germany 9.42
29 Finland 9.31
30 Singapore 8.47
31 Malaysia 8.45
32 Austria 8.44
34 Belgium 8.37
35 Norway 8.3
36 Ireland 8.29
38 Israel 7.99
40 Poland 7.7
41 China 7.44
Love the Donald quote... Yep twice what the US emits, with 7 times the population
7 times? are you high?
@@bullpup1337actually as a generalization it's not bad.
China population: 1.4 billion and increasing. U.S.A. 300 Million and falling.
@@bullpup1337are you?😅
@@bullpup1337 nope, just not proof-reading
@@bullpup1337how about 4.2658610272 times, happier now?
And does that change the OPs original message? No.
How about the developed countries reduce their per capita consumption of goods which most likely come from production of countries like China?
The biggest polluter is the West so far based on accumulative emission since industrialisation and per capita! DW is shameless to put such subject!
If that were to happen, 800 million people would return to absolute poverty.
You're telling me its too hard for the famous "long term planning" CCP who manufacturing a large portion of the worlds green technology to reduce its emissions?
Where is the modern China that claims it can innovate? xD
@@user-1rg9f2-g3l6d China's exports now account for only 17% of GDP, while in 2006, this figure was nearly 50%. It’s not that China’s exports have declined, but that China’s economy is much larger than before. China's economic growth is much faster than other developed countries. China now has a huge domestic market and does not just rely on exports.
China produces 7.44 ton of CO2 emission per capital per year.
Kuwait 25.07 ton,
UAE 24.33 ton,
Oman 19.97 ton,
Canada 18.72 ton,
Australia 17.15 ton,
Estonia 17.02 ton,
Saudi Arabia 15.47 ton,
USA 15.32 ton,
South Korea 11.77 ton,
German 9.42 ton,
Japan 9.76,
Finland 9.31 ton,
Belgium 8.37 ton,
.....
Now, tell me. Who is farting more greenhouse gas? Don't tell me you should ask 100 people to fart as much as 1.
When we count wealth, we count per capital, when we count pollution we don't????
Should we put a quota limit on each country?? Let's say 9 ton per person per year?? Guess who is going to whine??
Don’t know what your source for those statistics was but according the global carbon project
Per country the carbon released in 2022 ( in million tons)
China- 11,472
United States- 5,007
India- 2,710
Russia-1,756
Japan-1,076
Iran- 567
Germany- 675
Saudi Arabia- 672
Indonesia -619
South Korea-616
Canada-546
Brazil- 489
@@critterjon4061 Then you divide that by population, very simple.
@@critterjon4061 per PERSON
@@pandoorapirat8644 I fail to see how population a relevant to total greenhouse gas output
@@critterjon4061 if you fail to see why it matters then you're just ignorant or playing dumb -- CO2 emissions are way higher in Western countries due to wasteful / greedy way of living.
What do you expect when China is the center of the global manufacturing hub?
Current-day investment into more pollution-reduction-efficient power plants than 150 year old coal-based technology. Like, you know, gas (that they're getting on discount from Russians) or nuclear (which generates tremendous amounts for how little pollution it produces).
@@SloeJuice not every country has the reserve of nuclear mine, include China, most of their nuclear ore need to import, so that's also a reason why they choose the coal power station as priority 20-30 years ago
In china,most of people like hang the clothes outdoor,we think it is a normal things,can save power and fell the smells of sunshine.but when I know this is forbidden in US and some west country.I am puzzled,why ? you said we need reduce carbon.but………
It depends on how you calculate it. First It is necessary to calculate the historical cumulative emissions of each country. The greenhouse effect is not formed in a day, the historical emissions over decades should certainly be taken into account.
Second, the cumulative emissions should be based on per human capita or per human capita per unit of earth area. According to the universal standards of human rights, everyone has the equal right to a happy life. Then of course it also extends to the happy carbon emission standards. 😂
You are absolutely right when you say "According to the universal standards of human rights, everyone has the equal right to a happy life.". China today have advantages to invest on more advanced technologies than many developed countries did one the past and today they have understood the CO2 emission and pollution from fossil fuels better. Following the same way which is damaging environment and health of peoples by polluting "your cities" will damage China peoples health and is not happy life.
Wind and Solar energies really are helping China, but these energies are intermittent, need energy storing, energy transition lines and distribution and have low efficiency. The SMR may be better for China and others, but are expensive and need radioactive fuel. China has opportunity to invest on new clean technology which is not disclosed and can produce energy using levitation-gravity power. This does not depend from any fuel, the energy can be generated on demand, close consumers which will save China capital expenditure for storing and transmitting. Contact me and I will arrange bilateral talks between China representative and inventors of levitation-gravity engine. This is an opportunity which will help China to accelerate energy transition and make the country secure and independent on clean energy needs.
Also emerging markets density is much higher than G7 countries Average carbon number is totally misleading for a scale of country as large as China. Then Wesr finger pointing is just super tacky..
The biggest polluter is the West so far based on accumulative emission since industrialisation and per capita! DW is shameless to put such subject!
Stop misleading people. Carbon emission should be measured per capita. In this respect, the U.S has 4 times more carbon emissions.
The word “per capita” wasnt mentioned even once in this video.
Dear DW, if you admit that man are created equal, let us calculate CO2 emitted datat based on per capita.
If the westerners could reduce their daily consumption, the environment would be greatly improved.😂😂😂😂
China produces those goods in order to meet the need of the westerners.
But people in developing countries, China included, would suffer because it's western consumption which is driving their economies....
Securing people's living quality is politically motivated? What logic is this lol
China is freaking smart though,, Yes, they might be emitting a little more right now, but Western countries have surpassed their emission levels by far in history. The fact that China is upping their economic activity and at the same time is focussing so much on making their economy so (environmentally) sustainable is just amazing! I wish Western politicians could follow their example and redirect their attention from simply just trying to cut emissions to boosting research and development efforts on renewables ❤
Where not talking about history and the industrial revolution, but China's current behaviors and violations.
@@CHINESE_PRIDEwestern historical carbon are still up there floating in the atmosphere
@@CHINESE_PRIDEtoday will be history of tomorrow
@Ma-sb4kc there's a big difference to building a coal power station in the 1800s to building one in the 2020s. China's refusal to decarbonise is one of the driving factors to the rest of the world refusing to do so. But what do you care, you're a Chinese bot being fed on coal generated power.
@@akamikeymbullshit, China has a much more aggresive decorbonIzation and more importantly, China commit and china deliver, tell me who from the western country achieved their commitment in decorbonIzation?
The responsibility for carbon emissions should be assigned to the locations where end products are shipped and consumed. Blaming global factories as the primary culprits for pollution is flawed reasoning. When consumption decreases, pollution from manufacturing countries also decreases. Consider restricting imports, especially those produced using environmentally harmful energy sources, to the EU; however, be prepared for a potential increase in inflation.
The biggest polluter is the West so far based on accumulative emission since industrialisation and per capita! DW is shameless to put such subject!
Exactly! Carbon tax and transfer credits.
So countries don't benefit from exporting products?
@@Red1Green2Blue3 Exports are a benefit, but the buyer should be held responsible for the carbon.
@@ZweiZwolf Without the western markets 800+million people would still be living in abject poverty. They've directly benefitted from exports and there's no reason to say they shouldn't shoulder some of the responsibility with the associated carbon emissions. They could have refused to produce said products if they found the shifting of carbon emissions to them as unethical after all.
Adding renewables doesn't reduce emissions. It favors growth, which increases metabolism, which increases energy demand of all types.
USA has acted most irresponsibly in this area.
If your country is to produce all products that you need, your country will pollute much more.
So ongoing war situation Isn't climate concern 😂
The war set by US 😂
If western countries are concerned about carbon emission , they would stop the wars and buy gas from Russia, and cut tariffs on electric vehicles. And as mentioned in the discussions below, carbon emission should be measured per capita and cumulative.
Most of the pollution generated in China (half per capita than the US anyway) is for exports consumed in the US and Western Europe. So it is consumption in the US and, to a lesser degree Western Europe that drives the pollution in China.
How ridiculous their emission per capita is lower than the us with a billion people
PER CAPITAL !!!
"China is investing 270 billion in green energy, is that enough?" What a silly question considering the EU only invest 50.
China suffers from notoriously bad air pollution in the past that is an environmental challenges.
The US has caused the most global warming throughout the past century.
The impact of industrialization in the West and the US make things with machines that ran on fuels which, when burned, released and emitted carbon dioxide and other gases that trap heat in the earth’s atmosphere.
US is the biggest polluter in the world.
For the past century, the US and the colonial power of the west in the bygone era release more CO2 than the rest of the world combined.
The carbon stock is still in the atmosphere.
With China opening up to the West to foreign investments and technology in the late 1978 and the vast labor force to the global market, China finally began its own era of industrialization.
It is very difficult for western media looking through the western lens that a non-white country like China is able to rise up and overtake the US and the west into a largest economy.
From an agricultural industries to a manufacturing industries, China is able to lifts itself to a modern economy within 40 years.
There is nothing wrong for China as a developing country to transformed itself so fast.
China has manage to uplifts 800 millions of its population out of poverty.
China and India are the world largest economy in the past.
It is a matter of time when China and India will become the large economy in the world.
China is the large emitter of CO2.
China and India is projected to have emitted more total carbon dioxide than all of Europe by 2039 and more than the United States by 2050.
It is not a surprise when you have 1.4 billion people.
India has 1.4 billion people.
In term of per person, China ranking stands at 40 position. US, Australia and Canada produce twice as much CO2 per person.
China determined attempt in reforestation and greening the desert to stop it from spreading further is part of its effort to stop climate from deteriorating further.
The rail infrastructure for such a large country like China instead of using diesel cars will helped lessening carbon emission into the air thereby causing the greenhouse effect.
China is promoting the electric cars instead of diesel and petrol cars to promote greener energy.
Solar energy capacity and wind turbine technology on a big scale to promote green energy.
So China is doing more than its fair share when compare to the US in fighting climate change.
China looks forward to collaboration from all parties to ensure that COP28 “continues and deepens ‘joint implementation’ and uses the global stocktake as an opportunity to send a positive signal of focused action and strengthened cooperation”.
China releases this climate action report every year, taking stock of progress in areas including mitigation, adaptation, and international cooperation, and stating its basic COP position.
The report states that non-fossil energy sources accounted for 17.5% of China’s energy consumption in 2022, and that its renewable electricity installed capacity stands at 1.2 terawatts, or 34.4% of the world total.
China is providing “pragmatic support” to African countries, small island countries, least developed countries and other developing countries.
As of September 2023, it has signed 48 South-South cooperation agreements on climate change, built four low-carbon demonstration zones, carried out 75 climate mitigation and adaptation projects, and provided training courses for more than 100 developing countries.
“Responsibly dealing with climate change requires a proactive and pragmatic approach.”
China has always attached great importance to ecological civilization.
The COP28 will act on multilateralism and conduct global stocktake focusing on implementation. He also hopes it would fully respond to the demands of developing countries, promote developed countries to demonstrate the necessary flexibility in reaching multilateral solutions, send a positive signal to the international community through practical actions, and promote the comprehensive and effective implementation of the Paris Agreement.
China's economic and social development has entered a comprehensive green transformation track.
China's installed capacity of wind, solar, water, and biomass power generation ranks first in the world.
China has become a major supplier of wind, solar, and power battery equipment, significantly reducing the deployment costs of global renewable energy and helping many developing countries access clean, reliable, and affordable energy.
China currently holds large shares in solar energy, wind power, hydrogen energy, electric vehicles, and is leading the green and low-carbon transformation globally.
China is now leading the charge in creating a green China and game transformation, both in diplomatic and technological terms.
China is doing more than its fair share when compare to the US in fighting climate change.
Every countries must work together to ensure that our children have a chance to survive in an inhospitable world they inherited from us.
We should try to save the world from extinction instead of indulging a mean-spirited comments.
为什么十年如一日讲这些内容。我知道中国碳排放是美国两倍了，没必要一直报，隔一段时间就报。你们是新闻频道，怎么一直重复报一样的东西
🤔?
因为这些西方媒体不提到中国会浑身难受
因为到2030年零碳排放就没东西报了
Let's not ignore...China 🇨🇳 Population is 1.4Billion USA 340Million...
US wins hands down with emission per capita. Journalism with malintent.
Now have we forgot the US and European industrial revolution, do you genuinely think that the passage of time has mitigated the emission produced during those era? China's emission is nowhere near those during the industrial age of United States
Seriously? You use Donald Trump as reference?
Double standards. Hypocrisy. What’s new from the West?
The public does not care about renewable energy in china , it is just not a topic
全世界都在举牌子呼吁保护环境争当环保英雄 只有中国默默的做到了每一个自己承诺过的保护环境的每一个任务
中国最大的威胁是中共，我们时代的革命。
廢話
The reutrn on asset of wind farms is.8-10%. So the green energy revolution is driven by market instead of pure policy. Building wing farms has very high barrier of entry in China.
The US doesn't include/factor it's military around the world in carbon emissions, the US easily pollutes 3-5x of China.
Is it possible to produce 24*7 electricity from solar power plants and wind mills...?
obviously not, but battery technology is about to solve this problem.
Solar from space FTW
I saw a documentary last month that said the China's carbon emission will actually peak in year 2024. After that, it will gradually decline quite rapidly meeting the Paris agreement a decade earlier than agreed upon, because they've been building renewable plants heavily for the past decade and this will be their primary source of generating power. The coal will actually be used as a backup in case if it's needed or to support the renewable plants.
The biggest polluter is the West so far based on accumulative emission since industrialisation and per capita! DW is shameless to put such subject!
Why is nuclear power not in the discussion?
Properly managing renewable energy to fully utilize it is not an easy task, it requires time.
When renewable energy completely frees China from pollution, isn't China the most advanced country in the world? A country that achieves sustainable development?
China can never be the climate villain since its emission is way below the developed countries on per capita basis. We should impose per capita CO2 for every country to be fair
It means that solar is not the answer :)
I wonder what dw gonna talk about ten years from now when china produce double the renewable energy of the world 😂😂😂
Its also polluting the ocean and destroying fish populations more than anyone else.
That's usa
simple
you want cheap renewable as soon as possible
you make it with cheap energy source first
They cannot see what China has done to improve environment since 2008 :)
'We should keep an eye on it.' LOL
Industrial revolution was started by West while you talk about present why don't you talk about history too
It will not make china look bad bro.
02:13 thats Because they discovered that green toys dont work in practice and cost tomuch
If india needs to phase out coal now they need close to around1 trillion USD of investment towards renewable. Which seems not feasible now
India is responsible for 7% of annual global emissions, with 18% of Global population.
So on the one hand, you are waiting for China to save the earth, and on the other hand, constantly blaming China for not saving it fast enough? And then you doesn't do anything yourself?（to save the earth）
AGREED
Well better than doing nothing at all! At least they are trying to offset the pollution.
By the way even talking coal power plants，China has the best technology and highest efficiency！
See, they cancel out one another. It all works out in the end.
Where has all the Western pollutive production of basic necessities go to?
中国创造了每年世界三分之一的物质，承担了绝大多数高能耗行业，例如电解铝、石墨、钢铁等。即便为世界他国创造了大量的物质，加上本国人民的生活，中国的人均能耗和碳排放仍然低于绝大多数西方国家，尤其是远低于排放大户美国。评论里的西方朋友们大概不知道明年年底中国仅可再生能源发电规模就将和美国全部发电规模相当，同时相当于德国发电规模的三倍（德国的发电规模中大量依靠污染严重的褐煤）。碳达峰碳中和的路线图，中国应该是目前全球唯一一个真正在用工业规模制造和技术革新认真在推进的国家。相反西方国家，因为几年一次选举，可以随意的把这个路线图推翻。储能、新一代更高效的光伏、氢能，各种降低工业碳足迹的投资和研发，西方媒体也不会报道。
China does not polute per capita any more than we do.
China is also not populated any more than we are.
Where do we go from here?
Ah, I know! If China was really small, it'd be much better.
I don’t know why the reporter is so judgemental that the three gorges dam is a environmental disaster.
Environment cost and disaster is bulshit. the latest tech can create an artificial environment or fix it
dw should read all the comments, they are veeeery interesting :)
only China has clear plan to reduce emission,other countries just keep talking with a so called target and then will definitively abandon when time is getting close.
Germany take it on your chin with all humility.
who inaugural the Industrialisation is the Great Britain and other western colonists since began the First Industrial Revolution have emitted more than among the total emitted by developing nations now on today context. We should blame who one thing is not change the Paris Agreement and the Sustainable Development Goals and Carbon Neutral is the real bedrock for all the verbal promise better actions.
You need nuclear and better technology. Dw does not research into the science. More of the same coal and climate news.
Developing countries like India China Brazil Indonesia should focus on its development and force the dveloped worlds to pay climate change compensation
China is responsible for 33% of annual global emissions
That's 6.78% for India
Brazil Indonesia is nowhere near to China's emissions level
Whatever else. In the end China will not just be the biggest single emitter of greenhouse gases at one time. It will also be the single biggest combined historic emitter. That's actually not that far of. At some point in 2030-2050 the biggest historic share of emissions will be China's. And then that part of the discussion must change. If it were up to me, then this unavoidable fact should already be part of the discussion.
In the world of tomorrow the largest share of global warming from greenhouse gas emissions, and the associated climate change and sea level rise, will be attributable to China. Just because this is not true yet today; Won't make it any less true tomorrow.
Hey china is not export oriented now its only 17 % of gdp also as china grows richer need for energy increase
Leading the world ... why neighboring countries have to suffer from PM2 from China?
Is DW an Indian media?
Biggest producer = biggest polluter. I don't see any contradiction here.
When it comes to China and promises then they get along as well as a broken relationship
Caculate accumulative and per capita！
What about increases nuclear power plants in China, they are great amounts,cheap electricity ? Coal power plant have too down side compare with nuclear power plant.
what about japan releasing nuclear polluted water into the ocean?
DW：japan is my boss
What is China's per Capita carbon dioxide emissions?
Per capita carbon dioxide emissions worldwide in 2021, by country (in metric tons)
CO₂ emissions in metric tons per capita
Qatar 35.59
Bahrain 26.66
Kuwait 24.97
Trinidad and Tobago 23.68
Brunei Darussalam 23.53
United Arab Emirates 21.79
New Caledonia 19.1
Saudi Arabiaba 18.7
Oman 17.92
Australia 15.09
Mongolia 15.03
United States 14.86
Kazakhstan 14.41
China currently has the world's largest installed capacity of hydro, solar and wind power. In 2019, renewable sources provided 26% of its electricity generation-compared to 17% in the U.S.
China just met its 50% renewable energy target early
Posted onJune 20, 2023 (Reuters)
(With 51% renewable energy, China’s 50% renewable target for 2025 has been just met in 2023)
you dont mention China is also investing the most nuclear power plant, more than the rest of the world combined, China is trying to do its best to reduce emission. not like west, only on mouth
Fighting into Shanghai, you can see the drastic change of colour of the ocean, as you get closer to the shore.
Its a guy who cheats on his wife and buys her jewelry or a new car everytime he does it lol.
Imagine the carbon emissions if there wasn't a 1 child policy
It wouldn't be much bigger, single individuals don't actually add that much compared to corporations. The 'safe what YOU produce' is a fabrication by oil companies to obfuscate their own involvement.
If there wasn't one child policy, they would hv even lower co2 emissions per capita, LOL, now Imagine the carbon emission of west if western countries had not outsourced their factories to china.
And germany imploding.
Per capita of chinese is Very low. Chinese Are human too. At This point Why say nothing On chinese hunam right?
Yin yang 😊
Interesting to observe. dw assigns indian moderator when it comes to chinese topics. or sometimes taiwanese correspondents.
we can only assume the intent.
its obvious
is it that difficult to understand？ China has 1.4 billion people to feed and develop， China is also the world biggest manufacture center， so China need to consume a lot of energy， at the same time， China is doing their best to fullfill its emission promise， as the figure you showed in the beginning， China is world No.1 wind and solar producer~
The world is hungry for cadmium, cobalt and rare earth minerals for its electric revolution. But mining them is very hazardous to environment.
Hypocritically we are not concerned if China does all the polluting while we raise stern policies for mining them, to the point China is the de facto exporter of those minerals.
We want cheap and as long it's NIMBY, it's OK. And we give China free pass, free money, free political power.
"Give" China? China has been a superpower for almost as long as civilisation existed, with the exception of the last 200 years, where they were kept down by the shenanigans of imperialist powers, from England to Japan. They aren't given anything, they are finally taking their place back.
But it's doubt that China is going to go about things ethically. The CCP never does.
@@Will_Smith_Slapping_Xi_Jinping Did the Spanish build their empire ethically? Or the British? Or any of the other large colonial powers? Did the US become a continent-spanning superpower ethically?
What is anything we accuse China of compared to the genocide on whole civilisations and the century-long exploitation of people across the globe by our ancestors?
How much of the wealth the UK still enjoys today was based on centuries of exploiting China and profiting from colonies like Hong Kong, which was only returned 25 years ago? How much of the US infrastructure that allowed the US to develop its west coast and thus gain influence in the Pacific and East Asia was built on the backs of Chinese that were practically slaves?
@@trnogger
Are you honestly trying to conflate a milieu and zeitgeist of previous centuries, to play apologetics for China's current crimes?
@@Will_Smith_Slapping_Xi_JinpingA BBC/CNN/FOX NEWS fed 🤡 is here
It depends on whether u hate them or like them
Happy to see that German is shutting down many of its industries due to high energy price, which helps it to reach zero CO2 emission sooner than expected. No emission, No pollution, No job, No money.
Can’t have it both ways CCP.
They can.
This comment section makes me happy lol
youtuber has record, 5 years before India bloggers kept rank China cities most polluted, and today, most of them mute, wait, here one India oriented put her finger on China again on behalf of Germany?
They don't use their own people, they use Indian or African origin people to propagate their ideologies
This report contradicted itself at all levels, they wanted to make China look bad, but they didn't succeed, yes China is probably the biggest emitter, but they are doing something about it. I am not a China fan, but give credit where it is due.
👍👍👍👏👏👏
How about Arafat... Yeah Arafat... You know walls project... You should had taubah...
Arafat-> al araf part of Musa favorite...
When people from jahim in to heaven when wall is open... And goes to some places where gate's of heaven open like tickets of bioscope...
Bioscope is like bubble who sky's is created like Muhammad sky's is made of bioscope where's centre is star yellow green... And had 7 rings... People many call it 7 rings as lv. 1 heaven
China's investment in renewable energy is exemplary. However, there are a couple of key things that need to be addressed, not limited to increasing battery storage capacity, improving energy sharing infrastructure, as well as increasing critical minerals recycling (rather than sourcing them from areas where there are substantial risks of human rights abuses).
That investment money is getting laundered like crazy though, and the system is so corrupt that very little of it makes it into something ends up helping the environment. If you want to learn more, look up the: "china throw away fields of electric cars". There's plenty of footage those eco-investment initiative EVs getting over-manufactured for grants & getting dumped and abandoned in open fields.
So the goal behind the investment is noble, but the system is too corrupt to actually implement the goal.
They should be in Israel who has impeccable record for human rights
@@directxxxx71 hahaha
WHILE TRUMP USA IS DOING.........................?