@@crazevfxSir swag is a perfect name for a perfect channel. Idc what you have to say. Sir Swag is the best channel on YT and it's not even close. Show some respect to the 2nd best channel in YT history (Mitten Squad is #1... RIP.)
It's crazy how the work that news channels should be doing is being done by a youtuber. I have yet to see a single news channel take a unbiased look at just their policies.
Almost all of the US "news" I see from the other side of the pond, are just gossip trash, that 100% stand by their favorite candidate. Except John Oliver and maybe some local news stations
its because they are being funded by companies that have their own opinions. it makes sense really. youtubers should just replace regular news channels. most of the news channels are flawed
there was no mention of dogs, and Trump refusing to state he'd want Ukraine to win. Therefore, I think they were already developing the video before the debate started, using info already presented beforehand (not like candidates would veer differently from their stances at a debate). With maybe some minor adjustments
"why are people extra gloomy" because grocery prices have increased by 400% in 2 years. THATS REDICULOUS. monthly groceries used to cost me 120$ a month. now they cost almost 500$ a month.
@STOPPEDINCOLORADO The same stores I've been shopping at my entire life? Idk how new York isn't affected while California is on fucking fire, but by all means, please tell me what magical store was able to beat off the 16% inflation hike while maintaining profits and staying in business. My old boss' store certainly wasn't able to do that. There was a point for two months where the prices of items would increase every week, so I'm genuinely curious as fuck as to how you're somehow not paying the ridiculous increase like every else
That unfortunately doesn't describe people who are invested in politics they don't care about truth or policy it's all about the party or politician that they like and validates their beliefs
a key fact to remember is that while prices did go up, a LOT of corporations used the media hype around inflation to price gouge further. So while you were paying 800% or more, the companies were making record profits of the real 16% increase in price. All by lying and saying it was inflation rather than their own greed. That's why we've been seeing a lot of prices decrease recently, as people have stopped buying at those ridiculous prices.
Housing it up what 50% NATION wide in 10 years, some areas that's 50% in just 5 years. Select groceries are up 50-100% and these assholes have the nerve to tell us it's only 16%
@@cheeseninja1115 Something more important to note is that in this case inflation has not hit the nation uniformly. Many of the price increases were nationwide increases by constant sums, not percentages - so the fraction of a person's buying power that makes up can be radically different between rural America and urban America. It may be that inflation was 'only 16%' nationally (which, bullshit, it had to be at least 25%), but if some counties are seeing 300% increases in cost of living while others are seeing only 10%, you can imagine how we get the confusion of some people treating this worse than 2008 while others are only 'gloomy'. There's also the fact that this is directly following what should have been a 'temporary' economic crisis in place of the universally expected "bounce-back"/"recovery" period. The MINIMUM most of us need to get back in line with 2019 is 4-5 years of 1-2% inflation simultaneous to a greater than 4% annual GDP growth, AND mass deportations to return the workforce size to pre-pandemic numbers. Alternatively, without deportations, we'd need greater than 8% year over year GDP growth with that same low inflation rate. This is partly why the Right is so obsessed with immigration at the moment - it's not just that they're taking American jobs and driving down labor prices, but they're also increasing demand for necessities of life driving cost of living up. The great disparity between this immigration and what we experienced during our golden age is that modern immigrants aren't coming with assets, they aren't coming with ambitions - their goal was to get here and any old job + welfare is satisfactory. This is a HORRIBLE pressure on the jobs market because people without assets/savings and without entrepreneurial ambitions not only DON'T CREATE JOBS, but also compete with the folks that WANT to create jobs for the working class opportunities. A coffee shop here or a toy store there might not sound like a big deal, but each would employ over a dozen employees who would be sustained by their wages. These kinds of small businesses being built, bought, and sold were what allowed the immigrant class to avoid being a crippling burden as well as establish themselves as assimilated groups. My fellow Gen Z and millenials love to complain how "pulling yourself up by your bootstaps" isn't enough anymore, but an economy where that isn't feasible cannot handle mass immigration.
Something about the 2017 tax cuts that’s rarely mentioned… it doubled the standard deduction from $12,000 to $24,000. That means that all Americans pay 0% in federal taxes on their first $24,000 of income. That is a huge break for the lower & middle class.
@@p3tite3bony - A "deduction" in tax terms means that you don't have to pay tax on that amount. For example, if you have a mortgage on your home, a mortgage interest deduction means that you don't need to pay taxes on the interest of your mortgage. The standard deduction is the deduction every American has access to from square 1. If you have a standard deduction of $12,000, it means that you don't have to pay any income taxes on the first $12,000 you earn. A $24,000 standard deduction means that you don't have to pay taxes on the first $24,000 you earn.
@@Sooxfarsbabymama - Everyone who makes over $24k gets the entire benefit, too. If you make $80k, you still only pay taxes on what you earn above $24k. If you make less than $24k, your entire income is tax-free.
@@thomasmoseley4015"the economy" is too complicated, boiling it down to gdp or any other single metric isn't enough. However only one party has actual targeted policies to lower essential goods
Its not though, as he pointed out the working class is the one that didnt get mch out of it. But overall the situation improved stats wise. There are many reasons why the US is not really made for wage statistics, one of them is the massive difference between the states and the wealth of the population. Any statistic that tries balance money for the entire country has to deal with the fact that 1 state is basically lifting a 3rd of the economy while another is on the level of a 3rd world country, the same with the super rich, you have so many rich assholes that they make the situation on paper look better then it is in reality. But that is not because the economist is wrong, that is simply how statistics work, prime example: every woman has 1.35 children and yet the woman you personally know certainly didnt give birth to 1 full baby and a torso with just a left leg and right arm.....a
@@YangyChaddyDad i want to agree with democrat financial policies but they have tied themselves to a group of degenerates that want to mutilate childrens genitals so i cannot in good conscious vote for them.
This video was very informative besides the ridiculous economy section. “The working class (the people who are most impacted by inflation) are hurt but everyone else is fine so the economy is fine” is a terrible take.
Not to mention fact checking T's theoretical inflation vs K's theoretical inflation, as opposed to the actually historic inflation of T vs K. Also ignored the effect of handouts, welfare, and undercutting existing labor with off the books imported labor, on inflation.
its not a take, its the truth, the economy is in a state of major growth, spending it up across the board, and wages are up, inflation is up but wages OVERALL are outpacing it, reminder that this is a look of the economy from the top, not any particular part, a look at all of it, on average people are having wages increased faster then inflation but heres the catch, all of this looks at the average, not the median, and that average is VERY much influenced by the top, big corpos and CEOs making billions of dollars, those are the people feeling the benefits of this booming economy, but as I said before, it doesn't matter who these benifits are being funneled to, looking at the economy without bias towards any specific people, whether that be CEOs or the working class, taking out every bit of bias and looking purely at the numbers, the economy is booming so its up to you to look at things, who are you, are you the working class? then you probably feel as if the economy sucks because your not feeling the benefits, but if your Mr. Jhon Business you feel great with the state of the economy right now
I mean its not entirely wrong though. I was a construction worker, work dried up due to covid and massive layoffs happened, so I jumped from job to job until I landed in the gun industry making more than I ever have so I mean it is true.
@@flamingscar5263 if only the top 30% are benefitting from the economy and the rest are suffering then how can you say the economy is in a good place objectively?
As an outsider, your politics are so entertaining but dear f*kng god it is hard to take something substantial from them. This video is a nice explanation about surface policies without the "culture war" issue you guys made up lol
@@MaIarky Yep this is the issue with videos like this because people take them as gospel and it's only if you're deep in the political hobbyist stuff that you can see the bias. A lot of people are looking for one singular authority to tell them the "truth" but there are people who editorialize and draw subjective conclusions but then present it to less informed people as objective "neutral" facts. It can get irresponsible if not malicious.
I imagine she’ll follow Bidens policies on rails as he’s put millions if not billions into state rail projects. Zoning is a local thing vote for your local people.
I don’t think Harris has put anything out specifically in terms of HSR for this election, but she helped secure a $647 million grant for the Caltrain Electrification Project when she was a senator, so that’s promising.
local governments are beasts of the state. federal gov has their hand tied behind their back but only dems have a coherent understanding on the needing to reform zoning and fund public transportation
On the note of economic policy. People are extra gloomy, yes. Because a line going up on a graph doesn't translate to a better life. Making GDP maximization the goal of economic policy makes that policy bad. Goodhart's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure." GDP is just the market value of all final goods and services produced and rendered. This is not a perfect measure at all. Spending is going up, yes. But perhaps that is related to the food itself becoming more expensive too. Wages are increasing perhaps, but they've still massively lagged behind the real costs of important goods. Finally, remember GDP was invented to argue landlords were unfairly taxed. In fact, an economy can run down its assets yet, at the same time, record high levels of GDP growth, until a point is reached where the depleted assets act as a check on future growth. The USA has done this. Which is where the 'shrinking workforce' would come from! The workforce is an asset, and it has been run down, the cost of raising kids is immense. The cost of living is huge. So people are working more, producing more for the GDP, just so they can live. And not reproduce...
Well said, far more articulate than me. Alot more people need to read this, they're using some frankly unimpressively weak doublespeak here and not enough people are catching it.
So much this. The rest of this video seemed well researched and informed, but the economics section was a total load of bunk. If that's what "top economists" actually think, we need to prepare for things to get far worse no matter who gets into office. The GDP going up doesn't put groceries on our tables, or bring housing prices back down.
It’s coming to an end on the gdp front as well as company’s continue to cut employees for the sake of record high profits, people have to have money to buy things
People who don't pay their own bills or are super rich will never understand this. This is why my wife leans Left. I've been the one paying ALL the bills lol...
@@JohnSmith-bs9ymblame price gouging, banks giving bullshit, and corporations scooping up rental properties en masse more than political candidates. While you’re at it, look at which political faction has allowed these to happen
@@megamilkxl3414 Its not just price gouging although we can agree that under Biden and Harris they have given corporations extensive control it is also this War in Europe and the massive amounts of waste being produced by that war. Energy effects prices across the board and Biden stopping peace and escalating yet another foreign conflict is diverting fuel from the civilian market to the battlefield.
Saying wages have raised along with inflation is wild. Ask any American how far their dollar went in 2019 and how much their wages/salary went up over the past 4 years. It's incomparable
For real, I've heard this same shit before. Economists saying that wages are up and jobs are plentiful, meanwhile, me, everyone I know, and thousands across the internet report just how hard it is to get a job these days and how low they're being paid. This goes especially for the tech industry. Fucking ridiculous.
Maybe average numbers, but not rh median, which is much more important, considering that the gap between high and low salaries increased (especially after the pandemic)
Imagine saying we are "better off" while ALSO stating everything costs more, including housing, food, gas, medical bills, electricity. Oh but don't worry, because your wages increased (not on pace with inflation, or even close) you ARE better off. Complete BS. I absolutely LOATHE anyone who compares your quality of life, with the GDP.
Remember in 2007 when financial analysts, economists, and talking heads in the Federal Reserve denied that a financial recession was on the horizon and that the economy was actually booming?
That was pre crash. These are the facts post pandemic. Remember how we also recovered from that 2008 crash under Obama and his policies? Yeah, things suck sometimes, and people are wrong sometimes. But recovery is not only possible, it’s basically inevitable after crisis at this point
@@strangelyukrainian7314An economic crash doesn't just randomly happen (most of the time at least, a pandemic is a bit more sudden), they probably knew for at least a year if not multiple years that a recession was gonna happen, but just kept sweeping it under the rug, making the impact of the recession more and more consequential.
@@strangelyukrainian7314 I remember people saying your argument and my retort is Trump created policies in 2016 that were undisputedly the "best numbers of our lives" (anti-trump pundit's own words). That combined with how back in late 2020 we were in V shaped recovery after the lockdowns means that, yes the economy is in fact terrible for the middle and working class.
You’re right! “Economists” (whatever that means to you) predicted steep market crashes the entire Biden administration. We are still waiting for that New Great Depression. Maybe we should look at facts instead of appealing to truisms.
@@sirswag01Uploading this as soon as the debate ended was a genius move, especially considering the fact you have been making it for months beforehand. Bravo!
Nuclear energy is far from the cheapest, renewables have actually overtaken it in the past few decades. I still agree with more fission power and fusion research
Cold war era fears anchor widespread support of nuclear energy. Vivek Ramaswamy, a Trump affiliate, is probably the strongest supporter of nuclear energy in politics today, though Trump himself has never endorsed any large scale nuclear programs.
People is an average. Which includes all the rich people who are the one the working class is having to give all their money too. The working class is doing badly but the rich are doing so well that it makes the economic statistics look pretty.
"The economy is doing well right now, and most people are better of now than before" Most people can afford less than they could before. You could push this maybe half a decade ago and it might seem reasonable, but not today
Real wages are only up by 1.7% since 2019 but costs on essentials are through the roof. These kinds of videos are the most insidious because the present as neutral while having bias which makes people let their guard down and not be able to spot the bias. It's meant to make you feel like they are the neutral authority magically above all the partisanship, so that when they slip in a lie or a lie by omission they can go undetected because you believe them to be "neutral" and "unbiased". It's messed up tbh. People watching this don't know what they don't know so when they hear a lie they have no way of knowing that it's a lie.
@@huntergville7040 When I have more time I'll try to remember to come back and give you a title, there are several if you search. But I'd say, particularly with politics there's almost no chance of complete unbias, but what you can do is diversify your intake because bias one way will have some gems of objective information and bias in the other direction will also have gems of information. The dangers of videos like this one is that its trying to claim the neutral position while still having bias. When you watch something that is clearly bias your brain knows from the jump to take the objective from the subjective, but when someone claims to be 100% unbiased it can trick the brain into being a bit lazy with discerning, you let your guard down and a lot of people are more likely to take the subjective parts of the video as fact. There are just too many major economic policies that Trump has announced that weren't even mentioned in the economic part of the video. He didn't mention no tax on tips, social security, or Overtime. These are flagship economic policies from Trump that could not in good faith be omitted from a compare and contrast video about each candidates platforms. Seeing that omitted immediately let me know that at a minimum this isn't a thorough video and at worst this is a malicious attempt to hide propaganda under the guise of "neutrality" so that it would be harder for viewers to spot bias. But this same narrator later dismissed the economic concerns of the entire working class as secondary to the macro economy, so there are a lot of things wrong with this video. With so many propagandist speaking from a "authority" its important now than ever to be able to distinguish between fact and opinion because often people are mixing them all up in hopes some of their opinions will be taken as fact.
im a trump supporter and that debate was a shitshow on both sides lol i couldnt stand to hear kamala talk about something unrelated and then it pissed me off when trump fell for her bait and did the exact same thing she did. trump has some good policies but he sure as hell is incapable of debating. in a perfect world we could have leaders well versed in logic and rhetoric on both sides but i think we're far past that point now
@@Jargoed because his policies are far closer to what i support and what i think would be better for the country on the topics of foreign policy and economics
@@lilhoodie15 Well said. People make political affiliation part of their moral systems rather than a simple difference in policy and administration affecting the entire country.
Honestly I am surprised of how well tempered people were in this video's comment section. It makes me start to believe more and more in the dead internet theory (Cheers for being civilized!)
One note about Trump's stated policy re: Social Security and Medicare. He claims he won't cut them. He said that in 2015 as well. However, he attempted to cut both in each of his annual budgets while he was in office, despite his promises. Fortunately, cuts were stopped by Congress.
We started running out of social security money and that made the stance change. It wasn't some randome heel turn. I don't want to pay for thousands of your ill budgeted grandmas while i will get none of my social security benefit back.
Social security is such a scam anyways. Basic low risk investments made in place of social security would make you substantially wealthier. Government that gets their taxes doesn't care if you are treated well, the investment fund managers you entrust your money with only get paid when you gain. Figure out who's more incentivized to treat you better.
Sorry Swag, whoever wrote that "Only the working class has really been shafted by the economy" is EXTREMELY tone dead. It was honestly shocking to hear how dismissive it sounded. Surely the working class, the very foundation of our society should be taken care of? So their struggles aren't as important? Your economist obviously has their own agenda.
Most of us are working class. If your wealth comes from an employer who pays you, you are working class. If your wealth comes from the businesses you own, you aren't working class. This distinction is important, because this class divide is the one that highlights the greatest conflict of interest between socioeconomic classes. One class benefits when people are paid more and treated well, and the other class is actively hurt by that, at least in short term ways.
Dawg it's an objective overview. There not ment to be much passion in it. If that's outrageous for you that's for you to deal with, he isn't here to spurr you to action, he's here to tell the facts.
@@Darth_Insidiouswhile that makes a lot of sense and I might agree with you, it doesn’t change the fact that people use working class to mean people low income, low skilled positions; it’s a knock on the video that they don’t define what they mean by “working class”
@@blueyoshi4211 I agree that this video is made weaker by not clarifying. You can tell a lot about somebody's political views by how they define working class.
You’d be surprised at how uneducated and uninformed people are… I’ve heard “I’m voting for trump cause he gave me a stimulus check” so many times 😂 like that $1500 stretched 4 years 😂 lots of people really don’t know the difference
Millions of people lost their jobs during COVID-19 and the economy plummeted. Now the pandemic is basically over and the economy has recovered. People are obviously much better off now than they were in 2020 when a worldwide pandemic was happening.
The well-being of a nation should not be measured by its economy. While financial growth may appear impressive, the middle and lower classes can still be oppressed, struggling to make ends meet. Just because your nation is generating a lot of value, does not mean you get to see ANY of that money yourself. It usually just goes to the rich elites as they exploit us.
@@blitzbc5689unfortunately thats just what happens when you try to be impartial and do statistics with big outliers, the rich raise the average so much that objectively the economy Remove the 1% and suddenly the numbers change completely and don’t look nearly as nice but you lose the impartial unbiased aspect
@@anarchostatist191 im just giving a simplified explanation as to how or why the numbers would look the way they do Yes, in this specific example a median would relatively be more appropriate but it still wouldn’t be enough considering we’re talking about the economy as a whole We’re talking about companies, millionaires, billionaires, the stock market, people living in places where rent is sky high, the government and all number of other things that would make the numbers look better on paper than they are for the average person
Why are people gloomy? Sister, home prices are skyrocketing and my income isn’t. Food prices are skyrocketing while my income isn’t. To avoid writing a book I’ll leave it at that.
@@donk8961 because statistics represent, and get ready for this, EVERYONE. the world doesn't revolve around you. The average bill for everyone is now down to normal infla6
@@donk8961 "You can tell me the most common name in the world is Mohammed, but I have personally never met one. Which am I going to place more value on?" Moron
"that isn't to say that there isnt a subsection of people who are genuinely worse off post-panedmic. the working class especially have been particularly shafted." 62% percent of americans are working class. the "subsection" is almost 2/3 of the country, which makes it the majority. it's a huge oversight to not include this information when we are talking about american econmic growth post-pandemic.
"The economy is doing well right now" yeah, no one can tell me that, I am living in this economy, everyone I know is struggling to afford food, I am aswell, no the hell its doing well
Everyone is apparently struggling to afford food yet when I go out on weekends it's packed full of people everywhere, spending money like crazy on concerts, bars, restaurants, sports, and events. Get real, the economy is booming
@@RenegadeSpider2 sorry to hear it but there will always be some people not doing well. The overall economy is doing great though, and the average person is wealthier than ever and earning more than ever.
@@nicolasgirard2808 every single person I know disagrees with you. I was doing great under trump and now I have an even higher paying job then I did then. But please. Go on and try to tell me how great I should be doing when reality is telling me a different story. My food went from $100-$300 for a week worth. My gas went to almost $150 for a week. My utility bills have almost tripled. The “economy” is going great all right for the rich
I was laid off and was unemployed for 6 months. I couldn’t get unemployment benefits or food stamps even though I qualified and couldn’t reach a human under the Biden administration. Then I was hired half a year later and found out that my rich boss was getting food stamps from his kids school and a stipend. I was filled with rage lol. These public welfare revenue sources come from our taxes, without option to opt in or out, and aren’t even guaranteed when you need them.
@@Austrveg I’m so sorry to hear that. It’s hard to get people to understand here that freedom means having control over our own money, and I honestly don’t understand how so many Americans are being brainwashed into thinking having less of our pay is a better thing.
@@hannahviolet927bc they are low info voters and frankly both parties have sold out long long ago. However one side is extremely blatant and upfront about spending more taxes. It's the side that want to extend free Healthcare to illegal migrants. Ask yourself, who's gonna pay for that?
I havent been able to find a job after a year and hundreds of applications after having people fight over me in 2022. The economy is horrible for anyone not in the stock market.
@@dylanbleck2462 well paying jobs hire off of experience, not degrees. thats why people will work at low paying ass jobs before they can go use their skills for something meaningful
It's crazy to me that this is supposed to be about kamala harris vs trump policies and half the policies they talk about are bidens and what he has done. Like what
At my job tonight (cook at a bar), there were a bunch of only democrats that are local to the area had a debate watch party. They ordered very little and I got payed to do basically nothing all night. Was annoying, but I got money from it in the end.
America deserves a political party that represents the working class. We’ve never had one and still allow these career politicians that have been bought by every lobbyist well before we can vote for them.
Well theres been two ways at this that is the Libertarian Party as a separate party or an outsider coming in to reform an existing party, which is Trunnp.
democrats really did used to be for the working party before the 2000's. now it seems like the only person that the working class will benefit from is trump. i dont trust either party but trumps policies are better for us as american people imo
@@Lawlz4Dayzz well you’re lying to yourself and history if you think libertarianism is the way forward. Truthfully libertarianism has only caused power from move from one oppressive class to another. Socialism is the only one that places the power in the hands of the workers.
@@Lawlz4Dayzz Also, trump isn’t reforming anything. He’s gives tax cuts to his rich friends, deregulated industries, and tried to impede any green energy initiative the US ever started
Better than me when I was a kid, informed voting is crucial. Remember that local government is just as important too, you can make more local change than you'd think!
I guarantee that the parties will spend the next 4 years arguing about these plans and then not actually do anything. But they will all unanimously ban tik tok again
One of Trump's biggest donors (actually the person who has donated the most money to in this cycle) is a stakeholder on Bytedance, so he did a 180° turn on the TikTok issue.
I mean, the Biden admin was able to pass the infrastructure bill which Trump couldn't even do with a majority in Congress. It worked to provide clean water for everyone in the US, make over a million new jobs, and repair our roads, bridges, railroads, etc. The Biden admin also got the chips act passed too, which invested in US manufactured chips to take off the pressure of relying on Taiwan, create manufacturing jobs in the US, and ease the fears of a Chins takeover. Trump's admin basically just got tax cuts passed - primarily for the rich and corporations. It's really not both sides failing to do anything.
The source for median wages increasing by 18% is a Bloomberg opinion article, really well done Swag. In reality, you know the reality that non-rich Americans are actually experiencing, median real wages have decreased since 2020.
Definitely true. Real wages have decreased by approx 6.5%. 31% cost of living increase with a 23% wage increase. If you divide 1.23/1.31 you get approx 1-0.065. The only reason it looks otherwise is because of rampant government spending increasing the money supply. Ironically enough government spending actually decreases productivity as it taxes via inflation money into government directed spending which not subject to the optimization of the market (the fiscal equivalent of evolution by natural selection) has the opportunity cost of that human effort being directed to the optimized tasks the market would have dictated without government interference.
@11Survivor so you want people to lose retirements and the dollar to crash? This would affect everyone. If you have a 401k, property in any form and more, then it would affect you too
@@11Survivor im not against it, we seem to be getting another great depression either way due to poor government planning so why not start it under kamala who likes more government planning.
every time I hear an economist speak on prices and consumers they show how dumb they really are... "while yes everything is far more expensive, consumers are spending 11% more so that means the economy is good!" bro, if everything is up 20% average and wages are up 6%, no shit, everyone is spending more on essentials and thus having no spare income for anything else making them more depressed while increasing the overall household spending the leaps of logic these "intelligent" individuals use really is so annoying to listen to
Right? Smooth brains could figure out things costing more=ppl spending more. They leave out that we're spending more on necessities. Housing, groceries, and utilities have all sharply risen. Ppl spending more money at restaurants is a really bad example that the economy is getting better.
You trust the good will of ppl too much imo. Plenty of ppl know the truth in that line of work, they choose not to say it cause its better for their personal/professional lives (also imo. I don't work in that field)
Ok but like the economy is good over all. That's just a fact. It's just a k shaped economy where most people are doing poorly while those little who are doing well are doing so well to keep the economy afloat. How stable it is is up to debate but the data shows it's doing well overall.
@@apollo8447 if the state of the economy is "a few people are able to keep themselves so far ahead of everyone else starving that line goes up" that's not a good economy, that's Victorian era class economics
The climate part cannot be overstated. Action is required, more people wanting to pretend it's all perfectly alright is the last thing the world needs, especially the mainly poor nations that will be affected the most.
@@DARK170pl You do understand we all rely on the climate to grow our food right? If we don't take care of our food production we'll starve ourselves or go broke trying not to.
@@devv197 the environment is very slowly going downhill and it will take MUCH more of what we have now to cause truly negative effects. we can't do anything about the environment in any fast way at all otherwise the economy will go downhill. it would take a very long time. people say that electric cars will help but those car batteries cause just as many problems as gas cars supposably do. the only way we could truly keep the environment in good shape forever is if we damn near got rid of all manufacturing and went back in time about 1500 years. rather than trying to help the economy and "save the environment" all at once it would be great if everyone could agree to get our country to a good and stable point and then start slowly cutting down on the use of things that cause high levels of pollution
The fact that an organization named “Sir Swag” is near the top of my list of most trustworthy, impartial, unbiased, well sourced and independent journalists is a testament to how unabashedly awful the current state of legacy media & news has become. Thank you for holding a light to this and providing such interesting and well thought out analysis. ❤
I do not mean this in a rude way but let me try to explain this for you. In capitalistic societies, what determines the price of anything from food to housing is mainly contributed to what is called “supply and demand”. Supply is how much of something there is (how many houses are in the country) and demand is how many people want to buy that thing (people looking to but a house) These forces balance eachother out and arrive at equilibrium, which is the price of a product or service. This means that if you increase one side of the equation, aka you make more houses, then the supply increases. When supply increased and there are more houses to go around, then the price of said houses will go down, because the equilibrium shifts.
@@OneDivineShot There's more than one way to increase supply; I think we have corporations buying up property to rent it out, and we need to introduce legislation that limits corporations' ownership of single-family homes when they own assets over a certain total value.
Does anyone else notice how the narrator's tone changes when talking about Trump vs when talking about Kamala? Language used for Trump: "attempted", "questionable", "meanwhile", "however", "dismissive" Language used for Kamala: "Pragmatic", "Collaborative", "Famously", "Consistently", "ambitious" No mention on the impact of moving Manufacturing back to America on the climate?
I think they just want to hit the wave tops. Like when they mention democrats move towards electric cars and stuff like that, another 10 minutes maybe would have to be dedicated to the fact that China would be a huge part in that, then they would have to weigh whether it is actual useful for climate change. A 30 min breakdown of two parties policies should be a starting point for viewers researching
You know we're cooked when a UA-cam channel called "Sir Swag" does an infinitely better recap of both candidates' policies than nearly every news channel, if not all news channels.
Inflation only goes up if more money is being printed at a higher rate. If rate of money going into circulation stays at a constant rate, it doesn't make inflation go up.
We’re on the cusp of world war three, and a collapse of western civilization within due to mass migration. This video is obviously made by someone that lives in a upperclass Australian neighborhood, and doesn’t read history, philosophy, or get out of there bubble much.
What are they misinforming us about? So far I’ve seen people take issue with the description of the economy being “better off”, and small gripes about specifics, but no one’s said this is misinformation so far, and they put their sources, so I’m just a little confused, man.
the worst kind of comments are the ones by those so ill-informed about the matters that they suffer heavily from dunning, and while they're at it, they throw off the people trying to get more into an already overtly jaded, difficult subject like politics
Nah the economics was BS pro democrat stuff. It had lots of incorrect in-built assumptions, e.g. that paying money to mothers increase their participation in the labor force.
The “experts” also often have bias. Rather than consulting experts it’s better to look at pure policy and explain their plans as they describe it rather than bringing in a secondary source to try to “improve” credibility.
@@ijsbeermeneer9952 Both candidates tended to avoid questions throughout. Harris started out looking nervous but once it got to the topic of abortion she picked up steam (she promised to restore Roe v Wade. Soon afterwards Trump started ranting about Haitian immigrants in Springfield Ohio eating pets (which immediately got debunked by the moderators as the Springfield police say there are no such cases) and that it's true because he saw it on TV. It devolved from there. The Harris campaign wants another debate but the Trump campaign doesn't.
@@ijsbeermeneer9952 they both didn’t do good at all, but whenever Harris was asked a question she would just start telling stories that had nothing to do with the question
Channel owner shoulda stuck to gaming. Notice how they don't go over how Kamala has failed at the border horrendously and now wants to extend free Healthcare to illegal migrants? Ask yourself, who pays? Yeah..exactly why I'm voting against her
@@carsonshelby8970 The Afghanistan retreat was terrible but was only in essence a footnote. The current inflation is awful as well but it was in the video but the issue is dismissed as though detached from reality. Yet still contrast the video spent all the time addressing the criticisms of trump. Omission when it doesn't fit the candidate you want to support is still biased.
@@Nightflare-ij4wl Inflation is decreasing (no thanks to Biden and No trump wouldn't have fixed it), the Afghanistan retreat was literally Trump's plan (the generals in charge blamed him not Biden). I am just saying, do you really want to vote for the man that denies a legitimate election, where his major donors and associates outline a plan to replace administrators with party loyalists, force cultural values on to others, and asks for withdrawal of support to the free world allies?
Economists are so out of touch because it simplifies our economy to just numbers when the economy should be focused on the people that make it run. When you look at it like numbers it makes it easy to just import more and more people to increase gdp like Canada.
@@mushroomanjcc1954 if you look at the numbers from the department of commerce you can see very good growth. inflation has been steadily decreasing as well.
@@ReynasRaider Same here man.. Same here, pretty infuriating to see most mainstream voters act like children over pretty milquetoast and mainstream candidates lol.
You guys gotta remember, increased GDP doesnt mean the quality of life increases at all for the citizens. And yes, wages have grown. But inflation has grown significantly larger than wages have. Thus making buying power even LOWER than before.
True. But that fault is not weighed upon the democrats. As an actual financial analyst, the fault is instead on the harrowing effects of the global pandemic, and the supply-and-demand laws which seized afterwards
You forgot an important thing- 2019 was the only year the US government has had a surplus in tax revenue since 2001. And another, the decreased energy costs also decreased many of the costs of living like food and water. Since then, our national debt has exponentially risen, and much of it belongs to our enemies. Should enough countries unite against us, we can be destroyed by said debt. My main critique for the video is that it focuses a little more on praising liberal policies and critiquing conservative ones rather than vice versa.
I don't think you understand the national debt. Around 1.8 of debt is owed to China and Japan, with Japan having the larger stake of that at $1.1 Trillion dollars. This debt is held in US Treasury bonds, which have a specific term and interest rate, usually 1-5-10 year terms. This debt, is like any other debt. Think about your mortgage (if you have one...) or your credit cards (probably got one of those, right...) these debts are outstanding, but the full balance is not "due" today. It is due at maturity for Treasury bonds. These bonds can also be traded, so China can trade the bonds for their going rate at any time. Japan, is our ally. The other major debts owed in treasuries, are by our allies. You're entire point here, is a fabrication of your imagination my friend, and you should educate yourself before you panic, because you are not seeing reality. A majority of the world, will not turn it's back in the US. They have literally NOTHING to gain by doing so, and much to gain by allying themselves with this country. It is said to see so many people within this country misunderstand the things that's they are so incredibly worried about.
This definetly was not unbiased. The reason i say that is 5-7 minutes in you talked about kamalas plan and picked selective things about trumps and went on to say why its bad, you did not do that with kamala. You then proceed to do the same thing with the rest.
I'm so frustrated by the fact that I keep hearing that our economy is doing well, but that's relative to the GDP, Stock market, etc when I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING INVESTED IN THOSE THINGS IN THE FIRST PLACE how am I supposed to participate or be part of this supposedly great economy when I can't even get my foot in the door?
Alright I gotta go to bed cause I have to go to work and discuss the debate with my students. But imma download this video and watch it on the commute tomorrow
Whatever level you are teaching, I hope this information goes into it too. I would’ve killed to have more information on what the hell they plan to do once they get elected more than who they are as a student.
We couldn’t land a sponsor for this one bros, so here’s a link to our Patreon if you want to throw us a couple bucks:
www.patreon.com/SirSwag
Never in my life have I wanted to be less broke
Can we get one of these for the Aussie election>? love ya work
Not even surf shark?
You should contact dbrand. They might just have the right kind of humor to do a placement on this.
realistically, the channel name needs a rebrand, too untrustworthy of a name for a news source :/
@@crazevfxSir swag is a perfect name for a perfect channel.
Idc what you have to say.
Sir Swag is the best channel on YT and it's not even close.
Show some respect to the 2nd best channel in YT history (Mitten Squad is #1... RIP.)
It's crazy how the work that news channels should be doing is being done by a youtuber. I have yet to see a single news channel take a unbiased look at just their policies.
most of this is copying mainstream news points, dont expect to much from this.
Almost all of the US "news" I see from the other side of the pond, are just gossip trash, that 100% stand by their favorite candidate. Except John Oliver and maybe some local news stations
Biased but informative (literally glazing the democrats but as it is informative, I will let it pass)
@@dde335when something is good , it's good . When it's bad , no reason to make it look good
its because they are being funded by companies that have their own opinions. it makes sense really. youtubers should just replace regular news channels. most of the news channels are flawed
This was uploaded literal seconds after the debate ended. The punctuality is incredible
yeah because it was planned.
Coincidence? I think not. Fr fr.
Made this video AS the debate was going.
mfs when they realize he didnt use footage from the debate
there was no mention of dogs, and Trump refusing to state he'd want Ukraine to win. Therefore, I think they were already developing the video before the debate started, using info already presented beforehand (not like candidates would veer differently from their stances at a debate). With maybe some minor adjustments
as an American I didn't even know the difference between medicare and medicaid, I figured I'd just keel over and die without work-provided insurance
why not educate yourself?
Americans are just built different ig
Many people who vote don't know these things. . . it is pretty crazy
I thought they were the same thing tbh
I don’t know the difference either but I’m literally 20 years old and on my mom’s insurance still so😭
"why are people extra gloomy" because grocery prices have increased by 400% in 2 years. THATS REDICULOUS. monthly groceries used to cost me 120$ a month. now they cost almost 500$ a month.
I live in NYC and do not experience this. Where is everyone shopping?
@STOPPEDINCOLORADO
The same stores I've been shopping at my entire life? Idk how new York isn't affected while California is on fucking fire, but by all means, please tell me what magical store was able to beat off the 16% inflation hike while maintaining profits and staying in business. My old boss' store certainly wasn't able to do that. There was a point for two months where the prices of items would increase every week, so I'm genuinely curious as fuck as to how you're somehow not paying the ridiculous increase like every else
@@STOPPEDINCOLORADO you must be lying because new york grocery prices are insane right now
@@Tiago-xl8ug wokes lie man
How big is your household because that sounds like a bunch of bullshit
More people need to see this video. Way too many people are getting caught up in their own echo chambers that do not allow any productive conversation
You think people want productive conversations? 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@hemangchauhan2864 you thinking that they don't when there is an example right in front of you is also a bubble
It helps noone to be reductive
or maybe more people need to learn about how fucked up usa duopoly is so we can make actual progress lol
That unfortunately doesn't describe people who are invested in politics they don't care about truth or policy it's all about the party or politician that they like and validates their beliefs
Bro, they really uploaded this immediately after the debate.
That cannot be unintentional.
S-Tier comment with no comments, lemme fix that.
crazy how they schedule a video to release after another program that has a set start and end time and it blows all you dumbass's minds
WOW OH MY GOD NO WAY MIND BLOWING HOW DID YOU EVER COME TO THIS CONCLUSION!?
4th branch of the government has a long and powerful reach around 😅
It's genuinely depressing that people like you are allowed to vote.
"A 16% increase in price increases gloom"
As someone who experienced %800 increase, yeah it definitely increases gloom
But GDP go up. That mean good.
@@reaemishi2278for our capitalist overlords
a key fact to remember is that while prices did go up, a LOT of corporations used the media hype around inflation to price gouge further. So while you were paying 800% or more, the companies were making record profits of the real 16% increase in price. All by lying and saying it was inflation rather than their own greed. That's why we've been seeing a lot of prices decrease recently, as people have stopped buying at those ridiculous prices.
Housing it up what 50% NATION wide in 10 years, some areas that's 50% in just 5 years. Select groceries are up 50-100% and these assholes have the nerve to tell us it's only 16%
@@cheeseninja1115 Something more important to note is that in this case inflation has not hit the nation uniformly. Many of the price increases were nationwide increases by constant sums, not percentages - so the fraction of a person's buying power that makes up can be radically different between rural America and urban America.
It may be that inflation was 'only 16%' nationally (which, bullshit, it had to be at least 25%), but if some counties are seeing 300% increases in cost of living while others are seeing only 10%, you can imagine how we get the confusion of some people treating this worse than 2008 while others are only 'gloomy'.
There's also the fact that this is directly following what should have been a 'temporary' economic crisis in place of the universally expected "bounce-back"/"recovery" period. The MINIMUM most of us need to get back in line with 2019 is 4-5 years of 1-2% inflation simultaneous to a greater than 4% annual GDP growth, AND mass deportations to return the workforce size to pre-pandemic numbers. Alternatively, without deportations, we'd need greater than 8% year over year GDP growth with that same low inflation rate.
This is partly why the Right is so obsessed with immigration at the moment - it's not just that they're taking American jobs and driving down labor prices, but they're also increasing demand for necessities of life driving cost of living up. The great disparity between this immigration and what we experienced during our golden age is that modern immigrants aren't coming with assets, they aren't coming with ambitions - their goal was to get here and any old job + welfare is satisfactory. This is a HORRIBLE pressure on the jobs market because people without assets/savings and without entrepreneurial ambitions not only DON'T CREATE JOBS, but also compete with the folks that WANT to create jobs for the working class opportunities.
A coffee shop here or a toy store there might not sound like a big deal, but each would employ over a dozen employees who would be sustained by their wages. These kinds of small businesses being built, bought, and sold were what allowed the immigrant class to avoid being a crippling burden as well as establish themselves as assimilated groups.
My fellow Gen Z and millenials love to complain how "pulling yourself up by your bootstaps" isn't enough anymore, but an economy where that isn't feasible cannot handle mass immigration.
Something about the 2017 tax cuts that’s rarely mentioned… it doubled the standard deduction from $12,000 to $24,000. That means that all Americans pay 0% in federal taxes on their first $24,000 of income. That is a huge break for the lower & middle class.
Glad someone pointed this out
explain this better pls
@@p3tite3bony - A "deduction" in tax terms means that you don't have to pay tax on that amount. For example, if you have a mortgage on your home, a mortgage interest deduction means that you don't need to pay taxes on the interest of your mortgage.
The standard deduction is the deduction every American has access to from square 1. If you have a standard deduction of $12,000, it means that you don't have to pay any income taxes on the first $12,000 you earn. A $24,000 standard deduction means that you don't have to pay taxes on the first $24,000 you earn.
Anyone making $24,000 is below lower class
@@Sooxfarsbabymama - Everyone who makes over $24k gets the entire benefit, too. If you make $80k, you still only pay taxes on what you earn above $24k. If you make less than $24k, your entire income is tax-free.
People: Yay we made a little more money
Banks: We're gonna fix that in the next patch
*Lingering resentment *
*noticing *
Yeah. The American cost of living crisis in a nutshell.
Banks aren’t all landlords… for the most part. Or yet.
@@normanclatcher i see you bro ⚡️⚡️
My wage raised by 5% cents. My food prices have doubled. Very inaccurate portrayal of economy
I was thinking the same. Noone can buy a house or groceries. I can't figure out what he's talking about.
@@thomasmoseley4015"the economy" is too complicated, boiling it down to gdp or any other single metric isn't enough. However only one party has actual targeted policies to lower essential goods
Its not though, as he pointed out the working class is the one that didnt get mch out of it. But overall the situation improved stats wise.
There are many reasons why the US is not really made for wage statistics, one of them is the massive difference between the states and the wealth of the population.
Any statistic that tries balance money for the entire country has to deal with the fact that 1 state is basically lifting a 3rd of the economy while another is on the level of a 3rd world country, the same with the super rich, you have so many rich assholes that they make the situation on paper look better then it is in reality. But that is not because the economist is wrong, that is simply how statistics work, prime example: every woman has 1.35 children and yet the woman you personally know certainly didnt give birth to 1 full baby and a torso with just a left leg and right arm.....a
@@YangyChaddyDad i want to agree with democrat financial policies but they have tied themselves to a group of degenerates that want to mutilate childrens genitals so i cannot in good conscious vote for them.
@@YangyChaddyDad And only one party actually prevented the inflation from happening in the first place.
the timing is immaculate
wtf r u doing here lmao
Yooo
Why are you here?
You could call it wizardry
so this is wat you're doing instead of uploading
This video was very informative besides the ridiculous economy section. “The working class (the people who are most impacted by inflation) are hurt but everyone else is fine so the economy is fine” is a terrible take.
That's exactly what I thought.
Not to mention fact checking T's theoretical inflation vs K's theoretical inflation, as opposed to the actually historic inflation of T vs K. Also ignored the effect of handouts, welfare, and undercutting existing labor with off the books imported labor, on inflation.
its not a take, its the truth, the economy is in a state of major growth, spending it up across the board, and wages are up, inflation is up but wages OVERALL are outpacing it, reminder that this is a look of the economy from the top, not any particular part, a look at all of it, on average people are having wages increased faster then inflation
but heres the catch, all of this looks at the average, not the median, and that average is VERY much influenced by the top, big corpos and CEOs making billions of dollars, those are the people feeling the benefits of this booming economy, but as I said before, it doesn't matter who these benifits are being funneled to, looking at the economy without bias towards any specific people, whether that be CEOs or the working class, taking out every bit of bias and looking purely at the numbers, the economy is booming
so its up to you to look at things, who are you, are you the working class? then you probably feel as if the economy sucks because your not feeling the benefits, but if your Mr. Jhon Business you feel great with the state of the economy right now
I mean its not entirely wrong though. I was a construction worker, work dried up due to covid and massive layoffs happened, so I jumped from job to job until I landed in the gun industry making more than I ever have so I mean it is true.
@@flamingscar5263 if only the top 30% are benefitting from the economy and the rest are suffering then how can you say the economy is in a good place objectively?
I hope this reaches just 1 person that didnt know positions of candidates and it informs them of who they align with.
not the best coverage of policies but its good for the mainstream medias coverage of them. would recommend it with that in mind
As an outsider, your politics are so entertaining but dear f*kng god it is hard to take something substantial from them.
This video is a nice explanation about surface policies without the "culture war" issue you guys made up lol
It works if you assume both are honest but people can go back to last term and thebone befor eit to see the real results of each.
As a Libertarian who prefers Kamala, they glazed over Democrats a bit. Could be less biased, but still informative.
@@MaIarky Yep this is the issue with videos like this because people take them as gospel and it's only if you're deep in the political hobbyist stuff that you can see the bias. A lot of people are looking for one singular authority to tell them the "truth" but there are people who editorialize and draw subjective conclusions but then present it to less informed people as objective "neutral" facts. It can get irresponsible if not malicious.
Neither support the reintroduction of national or regional rail system, or zoning reform🫠😮💨😮💨
I know 😭
TBF, zoning reforms are more of a local thing. No excuse on the lack of rail system support.
I imagine she’ll follow Bidens policies on rails as he’s put millions if not billions into state rail projects. Zoning is a local thing vote for your local people.
I don’t think Harris has put anything out specifically in terms of HSR for this election, but she helped secure a $647 million grant for the Caltrain Electrification Project when she was a senator, so that’s promising.
local governments are beasts of the state. federal gov has their hand tied behind their back but only dems have a coherent understanding on the needing to reform zoning and fund public transportation
On the note of economic policy. People are extra gloomy, yes. Because a line going up on a graph doesn't translate to a better life. Making GDP maximization the goal of economic policy makes that policy bad. Goodhart's Law: "When a measure becomes a target, it ceases to be a good measure."
GDP is just the market value of all final goods and services produced and rendered. This is not a perfect measure at all. Spending is going up, yes. But perhaps that is related to the food itself becoming more expensive too. Wages are increasing perhaps, but they've still massively lagged behind the real costs of important goods. Finally, remember GDP was invented to argue landlords were unfairly taxed.
In fact, an economy can run down its assets yet, at the same time, record high levels of GDP growth, until a point is reached where the depleted assets act as a check on future growth. The USA has done this. Which is where the 'shrinking workforce' would come from! The workforce is an asset, and it has been run down, the cost of raising kids is immense. The cost of living is huge. So people are working more, producing more for the GDP, just so they can live. And not reproduce...
Well said, far more articulate than me.
Alot more people need to read this, they're using some frankly unimpressively weak doublespeak here and not enough people are catching it.
So much this. The rest of this video seemed well researched and informed, but the economics section was a total load of bunk. If that's what "top economists" actually think, we need to prepare for things to get far worse no matter who gets into office. The GDP going up doesn't put groceries on our tables, or bring housing prices back down.
Source?
It’s coming to an end on the gdp front as well as company’s continue to cut employees for the sake of record high profits, people have to have money to buy things
well said
"The economy is doing well right now"
Sure, for the 1%. The rest of us can barely afford to live.
People who don't pay their own bills or are super rich will never understand this. This is why my wife leans Left. I've been the one paying ALL the bills lol...
@@JohnSmith-bs9ymblame price gouging, banks giving bullshit, and corporations scooping up rental properties en masse more than political candidates. While you’re at it, look at which political faction has allowed these to happen
@@JohnSmith-bs9ymmy wife handles the bills and she still leans left
@@Poenas Is that money she made or you did?
@@megamilkxl3414 Its not just price gouging although we can agree that under Biden and Harris they have given corporations extensive control it is also this War in Europe and the massive amounts of waste being produced by that war. Energy effects prices across the board and Biden stopping peace and escalating yet another foreign conflict is diverting fuel from the civilian market to the battlefield.
remember when this channel was about over watch
a suprise to be sure, but a welcome one
Real OGs remember when it was about Dirty Bomb
titanfall
They still make videos about gaming too, good that they didn’t ditch their roots
Remember when overwatch used to be good? Yea.. thats why. And its called overwatch 2 now. 🎉
Saying wages have raised along with inflation is wild. Ask any American how far their dollar went in 2019 and how much their wages/salary went up over the past 4 years. It's incomparable
This
It’s almost like a world changing pandemic costs government money
For real, I've heard this same shit before. Economists saying that wages are up and jobs are plentiful, meanwhile, me, everyone I know, and thousands across the internet report just how hard it is to get a job these days and how low they're being paid. This goes especially for the tech industry. Fucking ridiculous.
Maybe average numbers, but not rh median, which is much more important, considering that the gap between high and low salaries increased (especially after the pandemic)
Yeah, prices doubled but I'm having a hard time finding a state that doubled the minimum wage, but a lot of jobs still paying minimum wage.
Imagine saying we are "better off" while ALSO stating everything costs more, including housing, food, gas, medical bills, electricity. Oh but don't worry, because your wages increased (not on pace with inflation, or even close) you ARE better off.
Complete BS.
I absolutely LOATHE anyone who compares your quality of life, with the GDP.
Correct
@@cheeks7050this is why i never vote blue 😂
Yup. They use Orwellian chocolate ration math to convince us things are so good now
They’re Australian? What else are they supposed to do? They don’t live here?
@@bb3ll07 they aren’t even Democrats, they’re Australians, why are you blaming the democrats for an Australian comparing gdp to quality of life?
Remember in 2007 when financial analysts, economists, and talking heads in the Federal Reserve denied that a financial recession was on the horizon and that the economy was actually booming?
That was pre crash. These are the facts post pandemic. Remember how we also recovered from that 2008 crash under Obama and his policies? Yeah, things suck sometimes, and people are wrong sometimes. But recovery is not only possible, it’s basically inevitable after crisis at this point
@@strangelyukrainian7314An economic crash doesn't just randomly happen (most of the time at least, a pandemic is a bit more sudden), they probably knew for at least a year if not multiple years that a recession was gonna happen, but just kept sweeping it under the rug, making the impact of the recession more and more consequential.
if you think there will be a crash, you are free to start shorting the stock market to your heart's content
@@strangelyukrainian7314 I remember people saying your argument and my retort is Trump created policies in 2016 that were undisputedly the "best numbers of our lives" (anti-trump pundit's own words). That combined with how back in late 2020 we were in V shaped recovery after the lockdowns means that, yes the economy is in fact terrible for the middle and working class.
You’re right! “Economists” (whatever that means to you) predicted steep market crashes the entire Biden administration. We are still waiting for that New Great Depression. Maybe we should look at facts instead of appealing to truisms.
Well goddamn the debate just ended
😂😂😂
Can’t believe I missed the last part of the debate i was taking a shit and my phone died 🤦♂️
We started this video 3 months ago.
@@sirswag01Uploading this as soon as the debate ended was a genius move, especially considering the fact you have been making it for months beforehand. Bravo!
@@sirswag01 makes sense
8:41 funny how none of them seemed in favor of nuclear or fusion power which is clean, cheap and safe.
Nuclear energy is far from the cheapest, renewables have actually overtaken it in the past few decades. I still agree with more fission power and fusion research
Trump has on video recently want to pursue nuclear energy
Fusion power does not exist
Cold war era fears anchor widespread support of nuclear energy. Vivek Ramaswamy, a Trump affiliate, is probably the strongest supporter of nuclear energy in politics today, though Trump himself has never endorsed any large scale nuclear programs.
@@MorgansTrainClips He has talked about it recently in an interview/T.V.
To see if anything comes of it, though
idk
"People are actually better off than they were before the pandemic."
Yeah, so that was a fucking lie.
People is an average. Which includes all the rich people who are the one the working class is having to give all their money too. The working class is doing badly but the rich are doing so well that it makes the economic statistics look pretty.
if you listened to the stuff before that, that sentence would have context you missed
@@judebachelet7822
I watched the entire video. Also, you should English write better.
@@curzon9619 bro i forgot a comma, your comment literally makes no sense LOOK AT IT 🤣
@@judebachelet7822
K
"The economy is doing well right now, and most people are better of now than before"
Most people can afford less than they could before. You could push this maybe half a decade ago and it might seem reasonable, but not today
Real wages are only up by 1.7% since 2019 but costs on essentials are through the roof. These kinds of videos are the most insidious because the present as neutral while having bias which makes people let their guard down and not be able to spot the bias. It's meant to make you feel like they are the neutral authority magically above all the partisanship, so that when they slip in a lie or a lie by omission they can go undetected because you believe them to be "neutral" and "unbiased". It's messed up tbh. People watching this don't know what they don't know so when they hear a lie they have no way of knowing that it's a lie.
Nobody could afford anything during covid dingus that's why they printed free money.
@@greenluxiis there a video that better explains our circumstances? One that doesn’t have biased right or left?
@@huntergville7040 When I have more time I'll try to remember to come back and give you a title, there are several if you search. But I'd say, particularly with politics there's almost no chance of complete unbias, but what you can do is diversify your intake because bias one way will have some gems of objective information and bias in the other direction will also have gems of information. The dangers of videos like this one is that its trying to claim the neutral position while still having bias. When you watch something that is clearly bias your brain knows from the jump to take the objective from the subjective, but when someone claims to be 100% unbiased it can trick the brain into being a bit lazy with discerning, you let your guard down and a lot of people are more likely to take the subjective parts of the video as fact.
There are just too many major economic policies that Trump has announced that weren't even mentioned in the economic part of the video. He didn't mention no tax on tips, social security, or Overtime. These are flagship economic policies from Trump that could not in good faith be omitted from a compare and contrast video about each candidates platforms. Seeing that omitted immediately let me know that at a minimum this isn't a thorough video and at worst this is a malicious attempt to hide propaganda under the guise of "neutrality" so that it would be harder for viewers to spot bias. But this same narrator later dismissed the economic concerns of the entire working class as secondary to the macro economy, so there are a lot of things wrong with this video. With so many propagandist speaking from a "authority" its important now than ever to be able to distinguish between fact and opinion because often people are mixing them all up in hopes some of their opinions will be taken as fact.
@@greenluxi My man doesn't even know what "real wages" mean
The debate ngl was interesting
However this video breaking down the policies said in this debate are truly better than the debate itself
True but i dont trust her honesty on policies from the last few years, especially after the sudden changes.
im a trump supporter and that debate was a shitshow on both sides lol i couldnt stand to hear kamala talk about something unrelated and then it pissed me off when trump fell for her bait and did the exact same thing she did. trump has some good policies but he sure as hell is incapable of debating. in a perfect world we could have leaders well versed in logic and rhetoric on both sides but i think we're far past that point now
@@lilhoodie15 Out of pure curiosity why would you say you support trump?
@@Jargoed because his policies are far closer to what i support and what i think would be better for the country on the topics of foreign policy and economics
@@lilhoodie15 Well said. People make political affiliation part of their moral systems rather than a simple difference in policy and administration affecting the entire country.
I'm sure this common section will be very nice to each other right? :)
Swag fans are usually pretty good all things considered, already seeing a few minor reply wars though
Honestly I am surprised of how well tempered people were in this video's comment section. It makes me start to believe more and more in the dead internet theory (Cheers for being civilized!)
Yes. Yes we will, because we're all decent folk. May not agree with ya, but love you guys!
We are here because of polarized views
@@everynowandthendoseoffacts1800 lmao
One note about Trump's stated policy re: Social Security and Medicare. He claims he won't cut them. He said that in 2015 as well. However, he attempted to cut both in each of his annual budgets while he was in office, despite his promises. Fortunately, cuts were stopped by Congress.
Damn it old man please think of the future. Your insanely greedy policies are dooming the youth.
He says one thing does the other, when will his supporters see that
We started running out of social security money and that made the stance change. It wasn't some randome heel turn. I don't want to pay for thousands of your ill budgeted grandmas while i will get none of my social security benefit back.
@@phillipp5538 based, boomers need to quit being so entitled
Social security is such a scam anyways. Basic low risk investments made in place of social security would make you substantially wealthier. Government that gets their taxes doesn't care if you are treated well, the investment fund managers you entrust your money with only get paid when you gain. Figure out who's more incentivized to treat you better.
How can most people be better off??. Even if there's more income if everything costs more, you're still left with less🤦🏾♂️.
yep
Bro the debate LITERALLY just ended and you've uploaded this
That's why it's propaganda masked as being "neutral".
Finally, a video that explains what both sides want to do versus shitting on each other, letting the consumer choose for themselves!
Indeed, I still will choose trump any day of the week, though.
Sorry Swag, whoever wrote that "Only the working class has really been shafted by the economy" is EXTREMELY tone dead. It was honestly shocking to hear how dismissive it sounded. Surely the working class, the very foundation of our society should be taken care of? So their struggles aren't as important?
Your economist obviously has their own agenda.
Depends on what you define working class as I suppose? Whether that’s people who work for low pay, limited skill physical labor, or work at all
Most of us are working class. If your wealth comes from an employer who pays you, you are working class. If your wealth comes from the businesses you own, you aren't working class. This distinction is important, because this class divide is the one that highlights the greatest conflict of interest between socioeconomic classes. One class benefits when people are paid more and treated well, and the other class is actively hurt by that, at least in short term ways.
Dawg it's an objective overview. There not ment to be much passion in it. If that's outrageous for you that's for you to deal with, he isn't here to spurr you to action, he's here to tell the facts.
@@Darth_Insidiouswhile that makes a lot of sense and I might agree with you, it doesn’t change the fact that people use working class to mean people low income, low skilled positions; it’s a knock on the video that they don’t define what they mean by “working class”
@@blueyoshi4211 I agree that this video is made weaker by not clarifying. You can tell a lot about somebody's political views by how they define working class.
No working class citizen in the u.s. is saying that they are better off after the pandemic. Are u kiding? Wow.
You’d be surprised at how uneducated and uninformed people are… I’ve heard “I’m voting for trump cause he gave me a stimulus check” so many times 😂 like that $1500 stretched 4 years 😂 lots of people really don’t know the difference
Millions of people lost their jobs during COVID-19 and the economy plummeted. Now the pandemic is basically over and the economy has recovered. People are obviously much better off now than they were in 2020 when a worldwide pandemic was happening.
@@accounts128But it’s still not as good as it was pre-pandemic.
The economy is good but some people get hurt and its the biggest group of people 😂
Seriously! I don't know how Sir Swag's people could ever say that with a straight face.
The well-being of a nation should not be measured by its economy. While financial growth may appear impressive, the middle and lower classes can still be oppressed, struggling to make ends meet. Just because your nation is generating a lot of value, does not mean you get to see ANY of that money yourself. It usually just goes to the rich elites as they exploit us.
@@blitzbc5689unfortunately thats just what happens when you try to be impartial and do statistics with big outliers, the rich raise the average so much that objectively the economy
Remove the 1% and suddenly the numbers change completely and don’t look nearly as nice but you lose the impartial unbiased aspect
@@ThyN00bly Bro just use medians.
@@anarchostatist191 im just giving a simplified explanation as to how or why the numbers would look the way they do
Yes, in this specific example a median would relatively be more appropriate but it still wouldn’t be enough considering we’re talking about the economy as a whole
We’re talking about companies, millionaires, billionaires, the stock market, people living in places where rent is sky high, the government and all number of other things that would make the numbers look better on paper than they are for the average person
Wages rose 23% from 2019 to 2023. Cost of living rose 31% from 2020 to 2024.
Why are people gloomy?
Sister, home prices are skyrocketing and my income isn’t. Food prices are skyrocketing while my income isn’t.
To avoid writing a book I’ll leave it at that.
Food prices are not sky-rocketing. They are at 3%. No matter how much you cry or deny it, it is reality.
@@patrickbateman1660 I get that you can Google statistics but I can look at my grocery bill. Which am I going to place more value on?
@@donk8961 because statistics represent, and get ready for this, EVERYONE. the world doesn't revolve around you. The average bill for everyone is now down to normal infla6
@@donk8961 "You can tell me the most common name in the world is Mohammed, but I have personally never met one. Which am I going to place more value on?"
Moron
@@patrickbateman1660This screams someone about saying their house burning down, but you answer with the classist old 'erm, ackshaully it's not'
If the way economists look at the economy contradicts the way our daily lives are lived maybe the economists are wrong.
"that isn't to say that there isnt a subsection of people who are genuinely worse off post-panedmic. the working class especially have been particularly shafted." 62% percent of americans are working class. the "subsection" is almost 2/3 of the country, which makes it the majority. it's a huge oversight to not include this information when we are talking about american econmic growth post-pandemic.
The fact that this was posted DURING the debate is wild to me
"The economy is doing well right now"
yeah, no one can tell me that, I am living in this economy, everyone I know is struggling to afford food, I am aswell, no the hell its doing well
Everyone is apparently struggling to afford food yet when I go out on weekends it's packed full of people everywhere, spending money like crazy on concerts, bars, restaurants, sports, and events. Get real, the economy is booming
@@nicolasgirard2808 yeah. I’m living in the real world having to eat beans for dinner. I’m being very real
@@RenegadeSpider2 sorry to hear it but there will always be some people not doing well. The overall economy is doing great though, and the average person is wealthier than ever and earning more than ever.
@@nicolasgirard2808 every single person I know disagrees with you. I was doing great under trump and now I have an even higher paying job then I did then. But please. Go on and try to tell me how great I should be doing when reality is telling me a different story. My food went from $100-$300 for a week worth. My gas went to almost $150 for a week. My utility bills have almost tripled. The “economy” is going great all right for the rich
@@nicolasgirard2808you have no idea what you’re talking about whatsoever. Go outside for 30 seconds and you’ll change your mind
I was laid off and was unemployed for 6 months. I couldn’t get unemployment benefits or food stamps even though I qualified and couldn’t reach a human under the Biden administration. Then I was hired half a year later and found out that my rich boss was getting food stamps from his kids school and a stipend. I was filled with rage lol. These public welfare revenue sources come from our taxes, without option to opt in or out, and aren’t even guaranteed when you need them.
Same situation but Swedish and i paid 50% in tax last month, you dont know how good you have it honestly. America is paradise
@@Austrveg I’m so sorry to hear that. It’s hard to get people to understand here that freedom means having control over our own money, and I honestly don’t understand how so many Americans are being brainwashed into thinking having less of our pay is a better thing.
@@hannahviolet927bc they are low info voters and frankly both parties have sold out long long ago. However one side is extremely blatant and upfront about spending more taxes. It's the side that want to extend free Healthcare to illegal migrants. Ask yourself, who's gonna pay for that?
@@hannahviolet927 nice anecdote but doesnt prove anything significant
@@hannahviolet927 if you ask the rest of the swedes except this guy, they will all prefer sweden 🤣
I havent been able to find a job after a year and hundreds of applications after having people fight over me in 2022. The economy is horrible for anyone not in the stock market.
Same bro😢
Hence why putting a republican in office would make it significantly worse.
Bro got a liberal arts degree💀
@@dylanbleck2462 well paying jobs hire off of experience, not degrees. thats why people will work at low paying ass jobs before they can go use their skills for something meaningful
It's crazy to me that this is supposed to be about kamala harris vs trump policies and half the policies they talk about are bidens and what he has done. Like what
Crodie had the video in queue the literal millisecond the debate ended, i respect the hustle
I had to turn off the debate and listen to a video of people getting high and playing minecraft and it felt much more intelligent
At my job tonight (cook at a bar), there were a bunch of only democrats that are local to the area had a debate watch party. They ordered very little and I got payed to do basically nothing all night. Was annoying, but I got money from it in the end.
"We are a failing nation" x1000
@@awolnation2446 i get the econ is rough but why go out and NOT get something to munch/drink? that's just really odd of them
@@LadyAsteria58 I guess they were so focused on the debate that they forgot about food? Idk honestly.
Fellow highcraft enjoyer here
America deserves a political party that represents the working class. We’ve never had one and still allow these career politicians that have been bought by every lobbyist well before we can vote for them.
it will never happen because as soon as you represent the middle class, the top elite will lose billions and even trillions of dollars.
Well theres been two ways at this that is the Libertarian Party as a separate party or an outsider coming in to reform an existing party, which is Trunnp.
democrats really did used to be for the working party before the 2000's. now it seems like the only person that the working class will benefit from is trump. i dont trust either party but trumps policies are better for us as american people imo
@@Lawlz4Dayzz well you’re lying to yourself and history if you think libertarianism is the way forward. Truthfully libertarianism has only caused power from move from one oppressive class to another. Socialism is the only one that places the power in the hands of the workers.
@@Lawlz4Dayzz Also, trump isn’t reforming anything. He’s gives tax cuts to his rich friends, deregulated industries, and tried to impede any green energy initiative the US ever started
Uploading this as soon as the debate ended was a genius move, especially considering the fact you have been making it for months beforehand. Bravo!
as a Minor, who has no say in any of this, I still like to be informed to this stuff, even if I can't make a change now
Great video guys
An informed future voter is one of the best things we can get. So good on you for being one.
same
dw you wont make a change when youer an adult, this country was bought and sold a long time ago
Better than me when I was a kid, informed voting is crucial. Remember that local government is just as important too, you can make more local change than you'd think!
same, also nice profile pic
"GDP shows how many pyramid schemes are run in the country."
There is no wage increase and I do feel the inflation over the past years …….
Seriously, I don’t know anyone whose wages have increased except by switching to a better job.
Goated political content. The perfect gateway to doing your own research on candidates and becoming an informed voter.
You don’t know how hard I had to dig to finally find a policy comparison not being done by some bias major media company
I guarantee that the parties will spend the next 4 years arguing about these plans and then not actually do anything.
But they will all unanimously ban tik tok again
One of Trump's biggest donors (actually the person who has donated the most money to in this cycle) is a stakeholder on Bytedance, so he did a 180° turn on the TikTok issue.
Its because they're mostly senile people who don't understand technology or the modern world.
and unanimously vote to censor the "far right" (anyone who questions immigration or support for israel)
@@zebulaun alright I ain’t say allat
I mean, the Biden admin was able to pass the infrastructure bill which Trump couldn't even do with a majority in Congress.
It worked to provide clean water for everyone in the US, make over a million new jobs, and repair our roads, bridges, railroads, etc.
The Biden admin also got the chips act passed too, which invested in US manufactured chips to take off the pressure of relying on Taiwan, create manufacturing jobs in the US, and ease the fears of a Chins takeover.
Trump's admin basically just got tax cuts passed - primarily for the rich and corporations.
It's really not both sides failing to do anything.
A lot of context missing here, but I get it. Can't have a 2 hour video lol favorite news channel by far
I forgot who said this but is very applicable to the video, "There are lies, damn lies, and statistics."
Mark Twain attributes it to Benjamin Disraeli, but I believe Mark Twain is known for having used it.
Wow I got more from this than the actual debate. It's honestly shameful for my country
The source for median wages increasing by 18% is a Bloomberg opinion article, really well done Swag. In reality, you know the reality that non-rich Americans are actually experiencing, median real wages have decreased since 2020.
Definitely true. Real wages have decreased by approx 6.5%. 31% cost of living increase with a 23% wage increase. If you divide 1.23/1.31 you get approx 1-0.065.
The only reason it looks otherwise is because of rampant government spending increasing the money supply. Ironically enough government spending actually decreases productivity as it taxes via inflation money into government directed spending which not subject to the optimization of the market (the fiscal equivalent of evolution by natural selection) has the opportunity cost of that human effort being directed to the optimized tasks the market would have dictated without government interference.
The fact this video gave us far more information on each candidates policies than the literal debate is really depressing.
it still missed a ton like kamalas unrealised gains tax which would destroy the stock market
tbh its a really overview of mainstream positions
@@sellis2819 good. The stock market needs to get fucked.
@11Survivor so you want people to lose retirements and the dollar to crash? This would affect everyone. If you have a 401k, property in any form and more, then it would affect you too
@@Foxtayls Yup, that's exactly what they said. Can't you read?
@@11Survivor im not against it, we seem to be getting another great depression either way due to poor government planning so why not start it under kamala who likes more government planning.
every time I hear an economist speak on prices and consumers they show how dumb they really are...
"while yes everything is far more expensive, consumers are spending 11% more so that means the economy is good!" bro, if everything is up 20% average and wages are up 6%, no shit, everyone is spending more on essentials and thus having no spare income for anything else making them more depressed while increasing the overall household spending
the leaps of logic these "intelligent" individuals use really is so annoying to listen to
Right? Smooth brains could figure out things costing more=ppl spending more. They leave out that we're spending more on necessities. Housing, groceries, and utilities have all sharply risen. Ppl spending more money at restaurants is a really bad example that the economy is getting better.
You trust the good will of ppl too much imo. Plenty of ppl know the truth in that line of work, they choose not to say it cause its better for their personal/professional lives (also imo. I don't work in that field)
Ok but like the economy is good over all. That's just a fact. It's just a k shaped economy where most people are doing poorly while those little who are doing well are doing so well to keep the economy afloat. How stable it is is up to debate but the data shows it's doing well overall.
@@apollo8447 if the state of the economy is "a few people are able to keep themselves so far ahead of everyone else starving that line goes up" that's not a good economy, that's Victorian era class economics
@@blazeburner303That's the economy Republicans fight for though
The climate part cannot be overstated. Action is required, more people wanting to pretend it's all perfectly alright is the last thing the world needs, especially the mainly poor nations that will be affected the most.
Cringe.
Another one that lives with mind in clouds.
@@DARK170pli don’t understand your viewpoint and truly want to know. What is wrong with caring about the environment
@@DARK170pl You do understand we all rely on the climate to grow our food right? If we don't take care of our food production we'll starve ourselves or go broke trying not to.
@@devv197 the environment is very slowly going downhill and it will take MUCH more of what we have now to cause truly negative effects. we can't do anything about the environment in any fast way at all otherwise the economy will go downhill. it would take a very long time. people say that electric cars will help but those car batteries cause just as many problems as gas cars supposably do. the only way we could truly keep the environment in good shape forever is if we damn near got rid of all manufacturing and went back in time about 1500 years. rather than trying to help the economy and "save the environment" all at once it would be great if everyone could agree to get our country to a good and stable point and then start slowly cutting down on the use of things that cause high levels of pollution
In the future it would be cool to see data on how often specific persons/groups have kept promises made at times like these.
I found most of the economy stats difficult to interpret, but the rest felt very well-presented
Because they were wrong and left wing biased lmao
The fact that an organization named “Sir Swag” is near the top of my list of most trustworthy, impartial, unbiased, well sourced and independent journalists is a testament to how unabashedly awful the current state of legacy media & news has become. Thank you for holding a light to this and providing such interesting and well thought out analysis. ❤
I would maybe reevaluate that list
Wow I learned more about each candidate's policies in this 30 minute video than I did in the 2 hour "debate".
Nah that wasn’t a debate that was a roast battle
The FBI stats on crime don't include major cities such as New York, Chicago, San Francisco
As an American. I can’t help but think. It’s not more houses we need but housing is too expensive
Yeah, if there is more houses they will be cheaper.
I do not mean this in a rude way but let me try to explain this for you. In capitalistic societies, what determines the price of anything from food to housing is mainly contributed to what is called “supply and demand”. Supply is how much of something there is (how many houses are in the country) and demand is how many people want to buy that thing (people looking to but a house)
These forces balance eachother out and arrive at equilibrium, which is the price of a product or service. This means that if you increase one side of the equation, aka you make more houses, then the supply increases. When supply increased and there are more houses to go around, then the price of said houses will go down, because the equilibrium shifts.
Take an Econ class at your local university university , your unapologetically ignorant lol
theres plenty of houses, but theres plenty of greedy landlords too :3
@@OneDivineShot There's more than one way to increase supply; I think we have corporations buying up property to rent it out, and we need to introduce legislation that limits corporations' ownership of single-family homes when they own assets over a certain total value.
Does anyone else notice how the narrator's tone changes when talking about Trump vs when talking about Kamala?
Language used for Trump: "attempted", "questionable", "meanwhile", "however", "dismissive"
Language used for Kamala: "Pragmatic", "Collaborative", "Famously", "Consistently", "ambitious"
No mention on the impact of moving Manufacturing back to America on the climate?
Ithi
I think they just want to hit the wave tops. Like when they mention democrats move towards electric cars and stuff like that, another 10 minutes maybe would have to be dedicated to the fact that China would be a huge part in that, then they would have to weigh whether it is actual useful for climate change. A 30 min breakdown of two parties policies should be a starting point for viewers researching
I'm guessing you love the CHIPS act
Yes I noticed
love a look without all the personal attacks
You know we're cooked when a UA-cam channel called "Sir Swag" does an infinitely better recap of both candidates' policies than nearly every news channel, if not all news channels.
do people not realize that giving out free money makes inflation go up?
depends who it's being given to and how
apparently not
people either complain about inflation going up or about not getting free money
if it's tax revenue then no
Inflation only goes up if more money is being printed at a higher rate. If rate of money going into circulation stays at a constant rate, it doesn't make inflation go up.
Damn, one is just objectivly better for people and the other just ruins peoples lives.
Bro i was looking for something like this all over the internet. I just simply wanted to here both their policies. Great video!
I think you might need new economists
His economists seem to be as unreliable as Trump's and Harris's (that is if either of them ever listen to an economist).
this has been the most informative and clear coat answers about policies i've watched. thank you
Just one minor thing undocumented non-citizens are still eligible for medicate if they’re deemed to be “at risk” or “pregnant”
This is the worst kind of misinformation, the kind that appears neutral.
100%
We’re on the cusp of world war three, and a collapse of western civilization within due to mass migration. This video is obviously made by someone that lives in a upperclass Australian neighborhood, and doesn’t read history, philosophy, or get out of there bubble much.
What are they misinforming us about? So far I’ve seen people take issue with the description of the economy being “better off”, and small gripes about specifics, but no one’s said this is misinformation so far, and they put their sources, so I’m just a little confused, man.
so true cheeks7050, so true
the worst kind of comments are the ones by those so ill-informed about the matters that they suffer heavily from dunning, and while they're at it, they throw off the people trying to get more into an already overtly jaded, difficult subject like politics
Yall know what you were doing 😂😂😂 that push notification made me laugh and turn on the vid immediately
So unbiased that it’s disconnected from reality itself.
What does that mean?
Nah the economics was BS pro democrat stuff. It had lots of incorrect in-built assumptions, e.g. that paying money to mothers increase their participation in the labor force.
Thank god this showed up in my feed.
Whole debate felt like a waste of time, but yall make it so much better.
Anyone who knows what a tariff is knows how stupid imposing tariffs is.
Debate response speedrun any%
The “experts” also often have bias. Rather than consulting experts it’s better to look at pure policy and explain their plans as they describe it rather than bringing in a secondary source to try to “improve” credibility.
You mean getting opinions of impartial Professionals that don't even live in the US is a bad thing?
i'll watch this tomorrow...i need to still process that debate...
Good night! Please give a non ud citizen a summary?
@@ijsbeermeneer9952politicians are worse than Twitter users
@@ijsbeermeneer9952 Both candidates tended to avoid questions throughout. Harris started out looking nervous but once it got to the topic of abortion she picked up steam (she promised to restore Roe v Wade. Soon afterwards Trump started ranting about Haitian immigrants in Springfield Ohio eating pets (which immediately got debunked by the moderators as the Springfield police say there are no such cases) and that it's true because he saw it on TV. It devolved from there. The Harris campaign wants another debate but the Trump campaign doesn't.
@@ijsbeermeneer9952 they both didn’t do good at all, but whenever Harris was asked a question she would just start telling stories that had nothing to do with the question
i wish everyone watched this video before the election
Bro said there’s no bias in the video 💀
there isnt?
these are their policies ? anything you think is “bias” is you not accepting what they are planning
Channel owner shoulda stuck to gaming. Notice how they don't go over how Kamala has failed at the border horrendously and now wants to extend free Healthcare to illegal migrants? Ask yourself, who pays? Yeah..exactly why I'm voting against her
@@carsonshelby8970 The Afghanistan retreat was terrible but was only in essence a footnote. The current inflation is awful as well but it was in the video but the issue is dismissed as though detached from reality. Yet still contrast the video spent all the time addressing the criticisms of trump. Omission when it doesn't fit the candidate you want to support is still biased.
@@Nightflare-ij4wl Inflation is decreasing (no thanks to Biden and No trump wouldn't have fixed it), the Afghanistan retreat was literally Trump's plan (the generals in charge blamed him not Biden). I am just saying, do you really want to vote for the man that denies a legitimate election, where his major donors and associates outline a plan to replace administrators with party loyalists, force cultural values on to others, and asks for withdrawal of support to the free world allies?
Economists are so out of touch because it simplifies our economy to just numbers when the economy should be focused on the people that make it run. When you look at it like numbers it makes it easy to just import more and more people to increase gdp like Canada.
Talking about politics? In MY AMERICA? I DON'T THINK SO
Okay cliveclegg
This has to be satire
Ok cliveclegg
*OUR America
You don't want to talk about politics in this country??? 😏😏🤨🤨.
YOU THINK YOU JUST FELL OUT OF A COCONUT TREE 😅
I’m not a Trump supporter, but this was clearly biased in the opposite direction and left out a lot of important nuances.
which part would say is biased
you should be if its between the two, one is pro-white (or at least pretends to be) and the other is not, easy choice
@@92vm
The whole "the economy is doing better" part despite housing, groceries, credit intrest, etc
@@mushroomanjcc1954 if you look at the numbers from the department of commerce you can see very good growth. inflation has been steadily decreasing as well.
@@mushroomanjcc1954 so you want more government intervention in things that normally aren’t controlled by the government?
Trump wants to unironically build Night City. Wtf.
edgerunning time
Turbulent time for guys named Martinez, I guess 😅
Im all for it choom 😎
@@El_Krani I mean, while I love cyberpunk very much, it is classified as a dystopian genre for a reason lmao
bideo game
The entire DC elite is 🗑️
The amount of bots on any political topic is crazy
Fr
choose your poision:
"ItS tHe DeMs!"
Or
"BlUmPf CaNt WiN!"
@@Randomusername56782 I'm personally libertarian but I likely won't see a candidate in my lifetime
@@ReynasRaider Same here man.. Same here, pretty infuriating to see most mainstream voters act like children over pretty milquetoast and mainstream candidates lol.
@@ReynasRaider
I mean, RJK Jr did endorse Trump, so you could argue he's the libertarian candidate.
You guys gotta remember, increased GDP doesnt mean the quality of life increases at all for the citizens. And yes, wages have grown. But inflation has grown significantly larger than wages have. Thus making buying power even LOWER than before.
True.
But that fault is not weighed upon the democrats. As an actual financial analyst, the fault is instead on the harrowing effects of the global pandemic, and the supply-and-demand laws which seized afterwards
You forgot an important thing- 2019 was the only year the US government has had a surplus in tax revenue since 2001. And another, the decreased energy costs also decreased many of the costs of living like food and water. Since then, our national debt has exponentially risen, and much of it belongs to our enemies. Should enough countries unite against us, we can be destroyed by said debt. My main critique for the video is that it focuses a little more on praising liberal policies and critiquing conservative ones rather than vice versa.
I don't think you understand the national debt. Around 1.8 of debt is owed to China and Japan, with Japan having the larger stake of that at $1.1 Trillion dollars. This debt is held in US Treasury bonds, which have a specific term and interest rate, usually 1-5-10 year terms. This debt, is like any other debt. Think about your mortgage (if you have one...) or your credit cards (probably got one of those, right...) these debts are outstanding, but the full balance is not "due" today. It is due at maturity for Treasury bonds. These bonds can also be traded, so China can trade the bonds for their going rate at any time. Japan, is our ally. The other major debts owed in treasuries, are by our allies. You're entire point here, is a fabrication of your imagination my friend, and you should educate yourself before you panic, because you are not seeing reality. A majority of the world, will not turn it's back in the US. They have literally NOTHING to gain by doing so, and much to gain by allying themselves with this country. It is said to see so many people within this country misunderstand the things that's they are so incredibly worried about.
I just simply go with whoever the media and celebrities are against 🤷♂️
Trusting celebrities to media and celebrities as the sources of truth would require an IQ lower than then the fucking titanic
Yes he uploaded right after the debate. It's a hot topic. Don't hate the player, hate the game, baby. Just getting that bag
This definetly was not unbiased. The reason i say that is 5-7 minutes in you talked about kamalas plan and picked selective things about trumps and went on to say why its bad, you did not do that with kamala. You then proceed to do the same thing with the rest.
when something aligns with the audience’s bias, they will claim it’s unbiased
Good on you for waiting until after the debate lol
Why's that?
@@betterjustice6697engagement, people will try to find places to discuss the debate or learn more about each candidate after said debate
I'm so frustrated by the fact that I keep hearing that our economy is doing well, but that's relative to the GDP, Stock market, etc when I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING INVESTED IN THOSE THINGS IN THE FIRST PLACE
how am I supposed to participate or be part of this supposedly great economy when I can't even get my foot in the door?
Alright I gotta go to bed cause I have to go to work and discuss the debate with my students. But imma download this video and watch it on the commute tomorrow
Well i wish you fun!
Whatever level you are teaching, I hope this information goes into it too. I would’ve killed to have more information on what the hell they plan to do once they get elected more than who they are as a student.
@nofilterneito literally just visit the Democrat and republican party websites and that'll tell you 90%
"have a FUCKING good one. 😊👍"
*That caught me way off guard.* 🤣
Ahh yes learning American politics from a guy named sir swag. Modern problems require modern solutions