Lmao at people defending the textures just because the systems and flight dynamics are good. We can have both people, you just need to stop defending this rubbish.
Great video as always bro. I was really looking forward to buying a decent 330 for X plane but man… I was kinda upset as I saw the cockpit texture. I think the 340 cockpit is way better than this. Would you still suggest investing in the aircraft?
@@bravo77whiskeyI mean I have almost every ToLiss product and to be honest I think the price is ok, but compared to their latest models (i.e. the 320N or the 340) the cockpit is pretty disappointing. Think I’ll buy it nonetheless. Thanks anyways bro, we should do some flights together sometimes
@@eduardofalcao8813 I think the A330neo is an extreme example of prioritizing functionality over visuals. To some it's an improvement over previous ToLiss products. It flies nicely but the first time I loaded it I had to load the A340 to make sure I'm not crazy thinking that it looked worse. I wish they put more effort into the arts for such a pricey add-on. As for X-Plane, if I didn't really enjoy flying aircraft I would have ditched it a long time ago. As for the Fenix, it's my favorite aircraft add-on across all sims, especially after it's block 2 full update. I enjoy hand-flying it at the moment.
While their system is excellent, the cockpit modeling and textures are really not worth the $90.Their previous products had this problem. Unexpectedly, the new product did not improve but became worse.
The team consists of people with good knowledge of the system and programming but unfortunately they lack a good 3d modeller in the team. All they know is programming a good system and flight model but their 3d modelling skill is pretty much basic. Hoping someone good in 3d modelling willing to join the team to fix that.
@@m4ster311 I flew on VATSIM 7 times recently and only saw two other players throughout those flights. Unfortunately for VATSIM you have to fly in certain regions at certain times to get traffic or ATC. It doesn't work well with the kind of flights I do.
I don't even know who is buying this in 2024. But it's awful. This is a model for those who don't care what they see. Probably in this cockpit you need to fly with very, very dark glasses.
Great aircraft but those textures are diabolical
Exactly LOL
You need freaking 10x 4090s to load these PS2 level textures
@@sapphiremillsltdword!!!
The first a330/a340 for any flightsim with accurate bogeys :p
Why, what's wrong with all others?
Oh man the cockpit modelling and textures are really bad
There’s a Mod out there that should improve the cockpit textures
How did we reach back to FSX level textures lmao
Looks like all ToLiss aircraft
@@skyraider06200 No, it is even worst.
I've been tweaking the cockpit textures a bit myself.
Since when did default aircraft look better than addons
How come the a320neo for x plane 11 have better textures ?
Lmao at people defending the textures just because the systems and flight dynamics are good. We can have both people, you just need to stop defending this rubbish.
My favorite bus. Wish it had better textures tho.
Great video as always bro. I was really looking forward to buying a decent 330 for X plane but man… I was kinda upset as I saw the cockpit texture. I think the 340 cockpit is way better than this. Would you still suggest investing in the aircraft?
@@alexaviationcorner thanks. I can't suggest whether or not to buy because different people have different interpretation of value for money.
@@bravo77whiskeyI mean I have almost every ToLiss product and to be honest I think the price is ok, but compared to their latest models (i.e. the 320N or the 340) the cockpit is pretty disappointing. Think I’ll buy it nonetheless. Thanks anyways bro, we should do some flights together sometimes
Where do you think the toliss 330Neo and XP12 stand in terms of flight model and physics against MSFS and aircraft like fenix?
@@eduardofalcao8813 I think the A330neo is an extreme example of prioritizing functionality over visuals. To some it's an improvement over previous ToLiss products. It flies nicely but the first time I loaded it I had to load the A340 to make sure I'm not crazy thinking that it looked worse. I wish they put more effort into the arts for such a pricey add-on. As for X-Plane, if I didn't really enjoy flying aircraft I would have ditched it a long time ago. As for the Fenix, it's my favorite aircraft add-on across all sims, especially after it's block 2 full update. I enjoy hand-flying it at the moment.
While their system is excellent, the cockpit modeling and textures are really not worth the $90.Their previous products had this problem. Unexpectedly, the new product did not improve but became worse.
The team consists of people with good knowledge of the system and programming but unfortunately they lack a good 3d modeller in the team. All they know is programming a good system and flight model but their 3d modelling skill is pretty much basic. Hoping someone good in 3d modelling willing to join the team to fix that.
@@chris22capt I think they're collaborating with flight factor to make an a350 so the visuals and system depth should be good
do you use SAM on the xp12 for the parking n gate to move n stuff?
@@stevantan3097 I use openSAM
Lovely sir!
My god even FSX addons look better
Have you ever thought about flying on vatsim?
@@m4ster311 I flew on VATSIM 7 times recently and only saw two other players throughout those flights. Unfortunately for VATSIM you have to fly in certain regions at certain times to get traffic or ATC. It doesn't work well with the kind of flights I do.
X plane in physique flight Perfect ,But imagerie 0/10
Whitch game
I don't even know who is buying this in 2024. But it's awful. This is a model for those who don't care what they see. Probably in this cockpit you need to fly with very, very dark glasses.