Top 10 Reasons to buy Nikon D850 in 2024

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 14

  • @robertodi9245
    @robertodi9245 2 місяці тому

    Nice video.
    I'm hesiting between d780 and d850(i have an opportunity to get a d850 with just 200$ more than the d780 that s why i hésitate) can you tell me on this year for wich one should i get? For wesding portrait and low light event.
    Thank you

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  2 місяці тому +1

      @robertodi9245 If you have an extra budget and memory size, go for D850 because of price and image resolution (46mp), D780 only 25mp, but almost the same because it has a bit modern tech expeed 6 rather than expeed 5 for D850.

    • @robertodi9245
      @robertodi9245 2 місяці тому

      @@geralkay3012 thank you for your answer

  • @garyCauser
    @garyCauser 3 місяці тому

    Since I'm sticking with my D4s for now I'm thinking D6 in a year or two. Once you've used a professional camera might as well stay with one. And mirrorless doesn't do anything for my landscape and wildlife for the money..

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  3 місяці тому

      It's nice to hear that experience from you. True, D4 is a great camera, and D6 may have more functionality and capabilities. I don't know mirrorless doesn't as good as dslr in landscape and wildlife.

  • @kimharrison3146
    @kimharrison3146 3 місяці тому +1

    Convincing enough for me to buy a second D850 body for my studio work. Shame about the computer voice :-(

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  3 місяці тому

      D850 is a superb camera top line DSLR. You'll never regret it.

  • @quazisanjeed6395
    @quazisanjeed6395 5 місяців тому +3

    I'm not a Nikon shooter. However, if offered a choice to select one from D850 and D6, I would go for the latter.
    The reasons are clear. D6 can do all. But D850 won't be a good low-light performer due to its pixel density. The D6 with its bigger pixels will certainly perform far better. The other features clearly speak for themselves.
    Resolutions above 30mp on a full frame sensor is pure gimmick, not a useful feature.

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  5 місяців тому +2

      I'll go for D6 too for low light because newer sensor. But, D850 won't disappoint for a long run.

    • @quazisanjeed6395
      @quazisanjeed6395 5 місяців тому

      @@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need.
      For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁

    • @quazisanjeed6395
      @quazisanjeed6395 5 місяців тому

      @@geralkay3012 being a pure hobbyist Canon shooter, I'm in love with older reliable bodies. Use 1D Mark IV, 5D Mark III & 7D for wildlife photography. They never let me down and don't miss anything that I need.
      For example, 40fps of R1 is unnecessary for my needs. 120fps of Sony A9III is a great real-life joke. However, some people will fall for it and, that's how manufacturers earn their bread.😁

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  5 місяців тому

      That Canon cameras are good, too. Sony A9III is a real deal joke XD.

  • @Stop-All-War
    @Stop-All-War 3 місяці тому

    Prefer D750, better @ higher iso handling & smaller body... inexpensive.

    • @geralkay3012
      @geralkay3012  3 місяці тому

      @@Stop-All-War True. D750 is a great choice. I recommend it.