There are hundreds of unidentified aerial phenomena being examined by the government. These are cases where balloons and camera artifacts have been ruled out. You could have made a video about how we need to continue researching and trying to find better evidence. I guess it was easier for you to make a video that belittles people. Congratulations, you have successfully done your part to make fun of people who dare to be open-minded enough to think that we should seriously consider that we are not alone in an impossibly big universe.
@@marius404 I will gladly make a video about how wrong I was once the evidence is there. I honestly think the universe is teeming with life, but the people currently dominating this discussion without providing any credible evidence are poisoning this entire topic. Until Sean Kirkpatrick’s credibility is put into question his view makes the most sense to me.
@@PistolPete.r Never said you were wrong. The problem is you are a jerk about it. I don't think there is enough evidence to believe aliens have come to earth either. Go watch "The Why Files" and you can take notes on how to debunk stuff without sounding like the most annoying kid in 8th grade.
It seems you're being a bit unfair to the video creator. The cases discussed involve some of the most well-known UFO sightings, and the purpose of the video was to emphasize the ongoing need for better research and stronger evidence. By debunking famous clips, the video highlights the importance of scrutinizing the data we have and pushing for higher standards of proof. The creator clearly expresses a desire for alien life to be real but insists that belief must be supported by credible evidence. Yes, they poke fun at people, but it’s often aimed at those in power who profit from promoting weak narratives. While there shouldn't be shame in discussing UFOs, it's equally important to demand rigorous standards and quality evidence in these discussions.
You gotta do more DMT if you wanna see the aliens bro
There are hundreds of unidentified aerial phenomena being examined by the government. These are cases where balloons and camera artifacts have been ruled out. You could have made a video about how we need to continue researching and trying to find better evidence. I guess it was easier for you to make a video that belittles people. Congratulations, you have successfully done your part to make fun of people who dare to be open-minded enough to think that we should seriously consider that we are not alone in an impossibly big universe.
@@marius404 I will gladly make a video about how wrong I was once the evidence is there. I honestly think the universe is teeming with life, but the people currently dominating this discussion without providing any credible evidence are poisoning this entire topic. Until Sean Kirkpatrick’s credibility is put into question his view makes the most sense to me.
@@PistolPete.r Never said you were wrong. The problem is you are a jerk about it. I don't think there is enough evidence to believe aliens have come to earth either. Go watch "The Why Files" and you can take notes on how to debunk stuff without sounding like the most annoying kid in 8th grade.
It seems you're being a bit unfair to the video creator. The cases discussed involve some of the most well-known UFO sightings, and the purpose of the video was to emphasize the ongoing need for better research and stronger evidence. By debunking famous clips, the video highlights the importance of scrutinizing the data we have and pushing for higher standards of proof.
The creator clearly expresses a desire for alien life to be real but insists that belief must be supported by credible evidence. Yes, they poke fun at people, but it’s often aimed at those in power who profit from promoting weak narratives. While there shouldn't be shame in discussing UFOs, it's equally important to demand rigorous standards and quality evidence in these discussions.