you could also reduce it to (√8)(√3+√5). I agree that √8 may not look as nice as 2(√6+√10) but it takes a common factor √6 and √10 have. either way, it's a great example of a simplification.
Love it! Great work. I forget we can extend the radical to cover additional work under the radical sign. Using the conjugate to reduce the fractional radical in the denominator was great, it's something I just forgot about! Thank you for the reminder ^^
you could also reduce it to (√8)(√3+√5). I agree that √8 may not look as nice as 2(√6+√10) but it takes a common factor √6 and √10 have.
either way, it's a great example of a simplification.
Thanks for the encouragement ❤️
Love it! Great work. I forget we can extend the radical to cover additional work under the radical sign.
Using the conjugate to reduce the fractional radical in the denominator was great, it's something I just forgot about! Thank you for the reminder ^^
I'm glad to hear that. ❤️
Are those "4's" or "Y's" ??? i began thinking they were "Y's" print a bit neater please. Thanks
That's 4's
I'll definitely improve.
Thanks for notifying me.
Y isn't a number though... I had no problems reading the 4.
The writing of “4” is terrible.
Noted