I was a Hi-Fi snob. But some time ago I realized I was listening more and enjoying it less. I envied people who had what I considered crap systems, but who got great enjoyment out of listening. I had my moment of truth; I was chasing my tail, I wasn't listening to MUSIC anymore, I was listening to THE EQUIPMENT! That's two different things. The whole point is the enjoyment of music. It's one thing if your equipment is defective, but does one need to spend$5,000, $10,000, $20,000 or more before they can start enjoying music? Don't get me wrong, of course I would love to have that $50,000+ system with a room to match. I'm just saying, don't get lost, and don't miss the point of all this, which is THE ENJOYMENT OF MUSIC.
MrMinathecat You are so right. In fact I have been an audiophile for over 35 years and have always noticed that most audiophiles listen to music that sounds good on their systems and not necessarily the music they like best.
I also used to play with audiophile systems but not anymore. It's good to listen to that excellent systems but I found myself enjoying various music not recorded up to audiophile or even HiFi standard. I just enjoy more music than the quality of the reproduced sound. If it's good music, you can feel it's good music, no matter how good it was recorded and reproduced out of the speakers. The players have put their souls in the piece already and the audience can absorb the messages musicians wanted to convey. Most musicians I know do not care much about their listening systems. They usually use whatever they can find to enjoy music and they can still distinguish the good, the mediocre, and the bad pieces meticulously. I still have my hi-end system but I'm not playing around with it anymore. Just consider it as an excellent system to play recorded music sometimes I want to enjoy a better quality.
Personally, (just my opinion) a $5,000 - $10,000 hifi system will give you some very good musical experience, regardless of genre. Spending more will give you some improvement, but not much.
Thanks for posting this Paul. Much appreciated. Both you and I are men of a certain age. I am a vacuum-tube enthusiast. I have a few vintage-1962 Dynaco ST-70's and a few Dynaco PAS-3 preamps that I've kept alive for 40+ years. Thanks again for your expert explanation of tubes vs. transistors.
I've been waiting 25 years for that, lol. I really appreciate it. That was the simplest, most concise explanation of valves vs solid state I've heard. To the guy who dosent understand how it effects sound: remember that voltage = PSI (roughly) running at higher voltages creates a higher share of linearity for the signal. The more linearity, the more headroom. More headroom allows for broader soundstage (x&y), faster reactions to peaks and lows, it adds some warmth (although a good SS amp that's good and warm and running in the meat of it's powerband is hard to beat) and definitely "puts less strain" on the signal b/c of the exponentiated section of linearity on offer to the signal.
"Something nostalgic about that warm glow makes me feel good." === I was packed off to boarding school in the late 1960s and took my Dad's cast-off tube audio gear with me. A number of my music-loving classmates had similar stuff. All our parents had the latest shiny transistor equipment but it didn't sound so good to us. Over the years I have had some really nice solid state gear but 25 years ago I built my first single triode power amp. It felt like "coming home" and is still my first choice, despite the more costly solid state gear I have lying around. Built to satisfy rather than impress...
@@TheRealWindlePoons Does this satisfaction lies in the ritual, the tradition or anything else that has more to do with some social aspect than the music itself?
@@mignotmaxime2409 No. Not Ritual. Not tradition. Not social. The single triode amplification stage has a natural presentation I have seldom found elsewhere. But its ALWAYS about the music. Otherwise, what's the point?
@@TheRealWindlePoons Thanks. I just read the 10 biggest lies in HiFi by Peter Aczel who says tubes do not sound different. I was wondering if the preference for tubes could be elsewhere than the music. Not necessarly a bad thing but it is the case, it must be clearly stated.
cool, I always liked the way old vacuum tube radios sounded when I was a kid. As an kid/teenager during the 1960's We guys use to hangout and go everywhere with our little 9 volt transistors. Happy to hear that the vacuum tube has not gone the way of the horse.
Yes, they sound different, but "different" doesn't necessarily mean better. In fact the coloration added by Tubes (pleasant or not) is often referred to as "good distortion" Tubes are used in the recording studio too. Some microphones use Tubes to warm the sound. And Jazz & Blues guitarist use Tubes for the sound they produce when over driven. I'm going to kick my own ass for saying this, but Tubes can make certain digital recordings sound better to our ears, BUT it greatly depends on what's being recorded.
Wrong ..............tubes are not warm sounding , only if not correctly implemented or wrongly used, clearly you don't know about vacuum -tube technology and that's a fact ............
Frank Geeraerts We use Tube mics in the studio to to warm or smooth an instrument. The terminology is just geek speak as long as its understood during sessions. Vocals can sound very nice with Tube pre's ... The Hi-Fi world is rather different. I wouldn't use Tubes in my system as they're not needed. And Frank, think about how you reply 😉
Frank, tube amps MAY sound "warmer" if they're single-ended design, in which case you get a noticeable portion of the 2-nd harmonic (over -60dB), which does sound somewhat pleasant. You don't get that effect from a push-pull design.
Audio Research went back and forth between tubes and transistors in their amps and preamps and their tube designs were always better. Warmest sounding amp I have is a transistor amp made in Norway but it gets hot as a stove. Tubes don't really have a warm sound. But what they do have is a lack of that hard edge sound of alot of transistor amps have.Everything colors sound but tubes tend to sound more like the real thing.
Class A amplification always sounds better, even if it is solid state. JVC had some really good amps that were super cheap (less than $100) , but they had poor speakers. I suppose they quit making them, but need to check. If done properly, class a/b is really good. Conrad Johnson tube amps and krell amps do this. Amps and Preamps that use a combo of tubes and solid state have some real promise. CJ had a full class a pre that cost the first born and what was left of the wife.
Two reasons tubes sound different, one is soft saturation, tubes can operate into a long saturation curve, two is that output is "almost" always through a transformer with hysteriesis distortion. When newer fet amps are designed to sound like a tube amp these "distortions" are programmed into the design.
I have been learning about guitar overdrive circuits and your videos have been much more useful than almost anything else I have read or viewed. Thank you!
I love tube amplifiers and equipment. I still have my pair of Fisher 30 watt 80az amplifiers I found in the 1990s, and 400c preamp. All tube, from the late 1950s and fun to learn on and to service. I love listening to all my favorite music on it. Anything my heat desires. It’s been one of the most pleasurable discoveries in life for me. One thing you’ll notice, as you grow older, your hearing changes and you’ll start missing some of the effects and subtleties that make hi fi so fun. My ears in my late 40s aren’t what they use to be. Is why young ears are so wonderful. Anyway I love my tube stereo. Cheers!
I did not study any of those thing. Thanks for make me to understand a so complicate system as a tube . I’m 52 years old ,and my childhood , I remember that we have to change the tubes in different electricdomestic artifacts.
@@joeking1019 I agree that at high signal levels that tubes clip differently than transistors, and this leads to differences in harmonic distortion. But in the video Paul claims that they sound different even when each is operating in their linear ranges. And in their linear ranges there should not be any harmonic distortion. Distortion only occurs in the non-linear ranges. Which leaves me wondering, who's correct, Paul or the people he claims are full of "you know what"? Perhaps it has more to do with the source impedance differences Paul mentions, and how those interact with the speaker? I'm not sure.
@@willdejong7763 Perhaps it is just a condition of being amplified through a vacuum tube, not necessarily driven to distortion, it was when I was younger and really into electronics and guitar amps that I learned about the 3rd harmonic produced in the tube, so I guess that just stuck as I've never heard a claim otherwise.
@giri kotte it could be both, this is from wikipedia Total harmonic distortion (THD) Music material contains distinct tones, and some kinds of distortion involve spurious tones at double or triple the frequencies of those tones. Such harmonically related distortion is called harmonic distortion. For high fidelity, this is usually expected to be < 1% for electronic devices; mechanical elements such as loudspeakers usually have inescapable higher levels. Low distortion is relatively easy to achieve in electronics with use of negative feedback, but the use of high levels of feedback in this manner has been the topic of much controversy among audiophiles.[citation needed] Essentially all loudspeakers produce more distortion than electronics, and 1-5% distortion is not unheard of at moderately loud listening levels. Human ears are less sensitive to distortion in the low frequencies, and levels are usually expected to be under 10% at loud playback. Distortion that creates only even-order harmonics for a sine wave input is sometimes considered less bothersome than odd-order distortion. Output power Output power for amplifiers is ideally measured and quoted as maximum Root Mean Square (RMS) power output per channel, at a specified distortion level at a particular load, which, by convention and government regulation, is considered the most meaningful measure of power
I commend Paul for not using the " transconductance curve " words.... He did a great job of describing whats going on without "loosing" the folks watching. BRAVO ! sbf
I believe that there are two major CAUSAL differences: (1)Tube amplifier distortion curves cross the cutting point of X and Y axis in a signal level/distortion graph. In other words, the lower the volume, lower the distortion. Thus at very low signal volume there is practically zero distortion. The transistor amplifier curve does not cross the meeting point of X and Y axis. The amplifiers never reach zero distortion. In some the distortion even increase at low volumes. Thus we always get some tangible distortion. (2) The noise levels of tube amplifiers are very low, specially at low volumes. The transistor always has some noise, so signal to noise ratio suffers at low signal levels. The audiophilic ears are extremely sensitive to distortion (and of course everyone can hear noise). That is why tube amplifiers sound so silky smooth and favored by audiophiles.
I have heard that transistors tend to emphasize odd order harmonics, while tubes emphasize even order harmonics. Is this true? If so, why is that the case? Thanks for your great videos by the way, I'm learning a lot!
Love your videos, my personal experence is they are all awesome, and both sound good in their own ways, and good for different types of music. I personally love tubes, from their slow warm up times to just simply how they work, to the sound they produce etc. Keep up the good videos :)
For me the biggest difference (as a guitar player) is the harmonics when distortion is present. The harmonics are frequencies that are added to the original signal. I don't know why but tubes produce even order harmonics which means that these new frequencies are higher octaves of the original signal. On the other hand transistors produce odd order harmonics which results in frequencies still dependent on the original signal but with in a different musical note.
I started with tubes and when transistors came along, the major diference was the power curve and noise floor. Tubes have a much softer gain curve, and can amplify well past their max power limit and liniarity to the point of melt down. The resilting odd harmonics are easyer on the ear. Trensistors' sharper saturation point gives even harmonics (square waves) harsh on the ear when over driven. The design solution was to operate transistors well below saturation and prebias above the noise floor. Field effect transistors do act more like tubes, and as a result designers can now "program" amplifiers to sound like a tube amp.
The odd harmonics you describe are from push-pull circuits which cancel out even harmonic distortions and apply equally to solid state and tube amps. (Perhaps you meant EVEN harmonics?) The even harmonic distortions from a single tube power amp closely match the human ear. The brain interprets this distortion pattern as being louder, hence these tube amps sound louder than they measure. The sharp clipping distortion patterns from solid state gear is mostly down to the comparatively large amount of global negative feedback used. Pentodes have similar problems (plenty of gain at the expense of linearity). With simple speakers and triodes you can get away with no negative feedback at all. You get a natural sounding amp with dreadful measurements...
Sir Thank you for your knowledge and patience to try to explain the the very complex theory of electronics and sound You are in my opinion the best of what UA-cam can offer Thank you for what you do I’m truly a real fan
Great rundown on the differences. The generality is mostly correct. Enhancement Mode Field Effect Transistors do have very low input current in the DC area and can be operated with electrostatic charges. The difference here between them and vacuum tubes is a grid in a vacuum tube has very low capacitance as it is thin wire physically spaced away from everything else. In a Enhancement Mode FET, the gate capacitance is quite high, and even worse changes with voltage as the depletion region changes distance creating a distortion that tubes don't have. For this reason, FETs have to run with relatively high amounts of negative feedback and do not sound the same as tubes in low or no feedback applications. MOSFETS are best used as either switching devices in inverter power supplies such as automobile high power amps, or as output transistors with high levels of feedback to control linearity. Bipolar Junction Transistors, have various amounts of linearity depending on the device. Some are very linear and make great output stages in a classic AB biased push pull output stage with little feedback for linearity. The family of curves on these transistors can be seen when driven on a vintage Tektronix curve tracer. Some have excellent linearity over a family of current steps. www.valuetronics.com/product/370a-tektronix-curve-tracer-used?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgsi3497s3AIVj19-Ch2jpQLQEAQYAiABEgKBFPD_BwE Our shop has one. Unfortunately the voltage step range is often exceeded by more modern MOSFETS with higher gate voltages. It would be nice if they updated the instrument to include modern MOSFETS. Some MOSFETS require more than 3 volts gate to begin conducting.
Interesting you mention that idea. I remember having a colour TV, bought way back in 1971, that had some tubes in it. It was in a small room and when it was on and the door closed it did a nice job of warming the room in the colder months of the year. I remember we would say our show is coming on soon, time to start up the heater!
Good thing there are guys still around who dig messing with all of this stuff. Personally, I'll take most anything decent and try to make it sound good myself, but I can understand the hotrod aspect of playing with this stuff
Pierre Marcoux is a legendary audiophile in Quebec. He's been testing audio equipment for local manufacturers like Oracle. Here's what he told me : Tubes have distorsion on pair harmonics and transistors, on impair harmonics... Even though tubes have much higher distorsion level, it's not relevant because pair harmonics distorsion is not audible because of phase cancellation. In other words, the distorsion cancels itself, which is not the case with transistors. Transistors distorts on impair harmonics, which are audible. That's why transistors require feedback sent in the signal. While this lowers distorsion, it also removes some musicality. There were two other differencs, but I forgot what they we're... sorry!
Depending on the tube preamp and associated equipment in my experience tube front end mated to a solid state power amp produces a huge three dimensional sound stage with unmatched harmonics, especially in the mid range, that blow away solid state preamps. Voices, string instruments, reed instruments and pianos sound, to my ear, much, MUCH better than solid state gear. The price paid is loss of transient response, loss of bandwidth and a higher noise floor. But once ya hear tubes it's hard to go back to solid state.
Build something from the late lamented Allen Wright's "Tube Preamp Cookbook". No shortage of transient response or bandwidth there (although he does use FETs too).
@@vincentl.9469 If we're talking line stage preamps, a 4 tube amp will dissipate about 30 watts maximum. Is that too much heat? It isn't for me but your mileage may vary.
The bottom line for the difference in tonal characteristics between valves and transistors is that valves tend to distort with a preponderance of even harmonics, and transistors tend to distort with a preponderance of odd harmonics. The even harmonic distortion is more musical because it is consonant with the original sound, whereas the odd harmonics are dissonant with the original sound. If you are always driving valves or transistors as a class A device and they remain _entirely_ within their linear range there should be no audible distinction between them because there should be no distortion of any sort. The differences occur when you drive them outside of their range of linearity, especially if you drive them either to the point of saturation or to turning off.
As an amature, the problem is that whenever I get to hear tubes - it's always on vinyl and horn loaded full range speakers. And when I listen the polar opposite it's: active speakers, DSP crossovers, class D playing Qobuz bit perfect FLAC 192/24 with full Dirac Live (like the Dynaudio Focus 50). So I think my idea of a "tube sound" is very much colored by the rest of the setup usually used. Add to that, the tube stack is playing some austere Kari Bremnes and the "tech stack" is playing Dream Theater or Tool.
thanks sir for all of these videos, there is alot of myths around this stuffs and what is better than that to see someone with practical experience explain it, every time you upload a video i can see i learned alot from it.
About 40 years ago an electronic technician I worked with who was also a musician, explained his simplistic rationale for the difference in sound. His take was that the heated filaments in the tubes would vibrate while being played. The variations in frequencies from the instruments imparted vibrations to the filaments of the tubes. This caused minute and constant changes in the flow of electrons between the various internal parts of the tubes. Solid state devices, having a different internal structure, lack the parts which enable the tubes to make the sound they do. 40 years ago, musicians were still talking about the sound that could only be found in a tube amplifier.
Its difficult to imagine resonance being a factor; if you compare the length of the valve elements with the wavelength of sounds at high frequency, @ 20Khz for example the wavelength is 17mm- maybe effects only the large valves?
I think you explain that quite well, from an electrical/ electronic point of view, harmonics play a big part in how many circuits work and how components interact, a slight variation in the right part of a circuit can make a huge difference to the output stage. A good and simple example of the harmonics effect can be found in computer networks... if you consider the plug into the wall powerline network adapters, they work by using high frequencies to send signals on cables already carrying electricity at lower frequencies (50 or 60 Hz), in modern telephone exchanges and fibre optic networks, this is done using MUX/ DMUX (multi plexer) systems where many frequencies can be sent as waves or pulses of light down the same cable/ fibre without interfering with each other. I have 2 Marshall guitar amps, a small solid state 15W practice amp that has a tube effect setting, it uses FETs and sounds pretty good and a 1978 SL100 series 1, it uses 4 tubes, 2 in the preamp and 2 larger ones in the power amp stage, I always joke that it sounds warmer, because the tubes have "heaters" used to excite the electrons, fact is, it does sound warmer, it has a natural distortion, even when playing "clean". Mr Carlson's Lab (UA-cam channel) has a good video on how tubes work).
T B, they where almost certainly talking about power amplifiers. Especially amps made for electric guitars where you deliberately drive the tube amp way out of the linear spectrum. You get tons of distortion from the amp, but its the kind of distortion they wanted. That is really far from what you want in a HiFi system where the idea is to reproduce the music as it is on the recording. Any kind of distortion your system adds will give a "sameness" on all music reproduced. With that said I should also say that a great clean producing HiFi system also lets makes all the badly recorded material very evident. It can often be to the point where you will avoid listening on badly produced material. Does that take the joy out of listening? I would say both yes and no. The best recordings will sound amazing and you will really enjoy them more. The bad recordings tend to be hard to listen to. If you still want to listen to them (and I do) the easiest way is to have another much cheaper system where you listen to them, e.g. i the car.
This whole thing cracks me up. I'm a guitar player. I've used my old Peavey guitar amp on gigs and had other guitar players come up to me and say "... man, that thing sounds great.... that must be a tube amplifier... " I like this because I'm using a relatively inexpensive amp, that has no tubes in it. In fact, the whole amp (which is all discrete, no ICs) has only one FET in it. The rest of that transistors are bipolar junction types (BJT transistors.) Peavey was cleaver in that they did use an audio transformer on the output, which helps to add just a bit of tube like "mud" into the sound. This amp was a cheap amp, to begin with (and I've replaced some parts with parts from a surplus store, occasionally) and that's what makes is especially amusing when guitar players mistake this for a tube amp. After I reveal that this is a solid state amp, I say to them: If tubes, alone, made for audiophile level listening, every table radio from the 30s, 40s and 50s would be audiophile quality... and we know that ain't true.
Yep FET's and JFET's are very close to Tube smoothness ! That's why use them in my guitar overdrives. Transistors are Faster, that makes them great in front of a tube guitar amp.
Nice explanation Paul. Anyway, yes they sound differently. But the main reason are the output transformers with their hysteresises and the slew rate. Due to the high value of the tube setup, they sound differently and gives you the warm feeling only tubes can give you. Signalwise on the paper go with BJT or with FETs if you like.
Everybody talks about frequency response when evaluating components or, in this case, tubes vs transistors. Linearity is related, for sure, as a nonlinear device will introduce harmonics. It’s easy to understand and the test is (relatively) easy to conduct. Input a sine wave and measure the output. But music isn’t a simple collection of continuous sine waves (keyword “continuous”). It is dynamic. From a drum beat to the pluck of a guitar string, every note is dynamic, that is, changing over time. Ever watch the vue meters on an amp? The ability of the gain stage (tube or transistor) to track these changes without distorting or running out of gas is critical. Tubes are voltage gain devices, almost no current draw on the input. Since no current flows, I suspect the tube is faster and better able to track the dynamics of the signal.
He said one is a voltage amplifying device and the other is a current amplifying device. It's the nature of how they operate that causes them to sound different.
ThePapabear2012 : Transistors aren't ever actually current amplifiers, that was just a scheme they came up with to escape a patent on FETs. The difference in sound comes down to differing harmonics, filtering, and biasing: if you bias a transistor or a tube correctly, then apply input, output, and feedback filtering correctly, then you CAN have them sound the same. The trick is that people don't go to sufficient effort to achieve the result (effectively, you're building a specialized analog computer for the purpose of simulating the "target sound": possible, but not necessarily worth the trouble).
ThePapabear2012 Jared Maddox uhhh... what? Amplifier manufacturers have been trying to make solid state amps sound like tube amps for decades (guitar amps, for example) and yet still there is a consensus among guitar players that tubes have a much richer, and therefore different sound. Tubes and transistors have very different physics, and very different sound characteristics. The current flowing in a tube does so in a near-vacuum, where the current in a FET flows through doped silicon. Tube current is controlled by a grid voltage, which produces an electrostatic force on the electrons which acts mostly parallel to the path of the electrons, whereas the FET modulates the charge between its source and drain terminals via a voltage applied at the gate which produces an electric field laterally to the path of the electrons, forming the channel between drain and source. As the poster mentioned, tubes operate at much higher voltages and temperatures than transistors as well, and of course the differences go on and on. They are two different ways to achieve the same goal but they do so differently, this is why they sound different.
William Ashland : And those characteristics (except for voltage, which can be handled if you're willing to spend the money) only matter because of their effect on the input characteristics (what are the input impedance characteristics, in essence), and output signal, which means that they can be simulated, including by analog semiconductor circuitry. The stuff you mentioned is all relevant to the designer of a device, but once a signal has passed through that device the effect no longer matters.
Hi, I only understood that they are different. But, what is difference in sound between tubes and transistors, are tubes better at providing low frequency response?
I researched Tubes and found that a scientific comparison had been done in a Lab. The results were most subjects prefered the music that was amplified by tubes. They said it was because of the fact that tubes have inherently a more natural distortion and that is more pleasing to our ears. So the report stated simply: The human ear preferes the distortion and final tones that tubes produce.
My thoughts are that the human brain has the ability to determine if the input its getting is real or a facsimile. I think this is the core of the tube or transistor, analog or digital debate.Analog audio and tubes are a closer reproduction of the original ,even with its technological flaws.
8:25 "anybody who will tell you that [three devices] ... running at the same [specified parameters] ... do not sound different because they don't _measure_ different ... is [wrong]" You never did explain exactly how or why in detail. I'm still not sold on the argument that tubes > transistors. But my focus is on the "measurement" itself. If instruments have finer precision and better resolution than the human ear ... and they "measure the same" ... then how can the things they measure "sound" different to the human ear?
yes tubes wear out but no one says you have to buy a tube amp with a large number of expensive tubes. i use a musical paradise set tube amp that takes all types and finding 2 new output tubes every couple years is not pricey and i find it fun. plus i can alter the sound 'quality' by using different types.
4 роки тому
Each sounds good in its own way. Manufacturers of SS and Tube gear have successfully bridged the gap in differences in the quality of sound. The only real difference left between the two types of designs is that tube gear lacks the juice SS does when cranked up which is a serious issue for me.
Good video explaining how tube amps work in the general sense. Though, I was distracted by the chirp of the smoke detector every 30 seconds or so. I kept counting the seconds till the next chirp.
The real difference between tubes and MOSFETs are the input capacitance. And the internal impedance due to the load. And not to forget - tube amplifiers needs an output transformer to match (e.g.) an 8 ohm speaker, with the limitations (or advantages) hence to this fact.
Tubes sound different but they also measure different. You can of course claim something to sound different without measuring different just by not measuring what makes the difference. Tube amps are usually clipping the peaks softly and you get more musical distortion (even harmonics) than some hard clipping transistor amp. A simple FFT measurement or square wave comparison can easily prove this difference.
simple, tubes produces even/odd harmonics adding to the signal bec. it operates to be heated to function (filament/heater connections - 6.3v, etc.), whereas transistor/solid state device just needs some biasing in a fraction of a current in milliamps or millivolts. tubes plates voltages requires very high voltages (100v, 200v - or >1kv) defending on kinds of output tubes used in an amp and it's topology or design, i.e. single-ended or push-pull, class A, etc.....................
I think you said even if the data shows the plots the same they still sound different and if so I find it hard to believe. I am curious if you ever did a blindfold test lol and how you did? Would be interesting. I use mosfets to pwm control motors so was wondering if you do that with speakers? If so you could linearize if needed or closed loop servo as well which is what we do. Or you could make a lookup table to replicate the tube response. Would love to know. Thanks for the video!
Valves are voltage-controlled devices. Normal transistors are current-controlled devices. FET transistors (Field Effect Transistor) are controlled in the same way as valves - by voltage.
The thing is that most music producers will make make it so the sound that we ear has tube sound being played by solid state amps... which renders all this discussions immaterial.
Think less is more. What worked in the past works today. I am a converted tech head and realized the error of my ways. There is nothing like a good LP through a tube and some great speakers. It's a ritual , it pays homage to many decades of refining the design and it sounds natural and musical. There were engineering Giants in sound in those days. Newer seldom means better in the world of hi-fi.
Perhaps I missed something. I'm 66 years old, have owned nice hi-fi equipment most of my life. I didn't get how they sound different from one another? What exactly is it that makes them sound different? I know tubes are supposed to have a "warmer sound," maybe "smoother" or "rounder" are better terms. What are we hearing precisely?
Amplifiers with tubes do not sound better unless you compare a High fidelity tube amplifier with a cheap solid state amplifier or you have a distorted way of listening the sound with a lot of nostalgia. The fact is, for the same frequency response band 20 to 20khz +or- 1 db 20 watts , into the same speakers in the the same room, you can evaluate the difference in the sound, it is the same but the equipment will be smaller and more efficient solid state vs. tubes , make the test as I have done decades ago.
Tubes do sound differently. I have a 1957 The Fisher model 80T Hi-Fi mono AM/FM tuner and preamp. In addition to treble and bass control it has four loudness levels. I connected it to a solid state integrated amplifier. Whenever I want to listen to old hi-fi jazz or blues recordings, I use the 80T. The sound is far richer and warmer than that of the solid state own preamp, although it is mono. The technicians of The Fisher went to great lengths to have a hi-fi preamp with very low noise floor and great Dynamic Range. The four levels of loudness allied with the treble and bass controls provide the best audio configuration. This 80T preamp and tuner also came with a power amplifier which also has it's own four level loudness control. I haven't used yet, because I have to figure out a way of commuting the speaker boxes from my solid state strereo equipment to this mono power amplifier and vice-versa.
Howdy. One possible explanation. In a BJT the collector current is dependent only of the base current and the gain factor. Collector voltage has no effect on the collector current. Within usable limits, of course. Tubes are different. The anode voltage will have some effect on the anode current. The gain factor is not a constant. The gain factor will be smaller at high signal when the anode resistor causes the anode voltage to be lower. This is an inherent compressing property of tubes. It introduces the third harmonic to the signal. Regards.
@@marianneoelund2940 Hi. Blimey. I stand corrected. The collector current is truly slightly dependent on the collector voltage. Thanks for the correction. In high regards.
Tubes and Bipolar Transistors sound different because they operate by completely different principles, the word "Transistor" is short for the devices full name "Transfer-Resistor".
@@suzesiviter6083 Yeah true, but tubes are mainly voltage-amplifier devices whereas solid-state transistors are mostly current-amplifier devices, yes there are Fets (Field Effect Transistors) and MOSFETS (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors) that operate very similar to the way a tube operates.
I’m sorry everybody but, when my 45 watt Solid state guitar amp was in the shop 40 years ago, I borrowed a buddies 6 watt Fender champ. That 6 watts of tube tone blew my 45 watt SS watt amp out of the water! I ditched that thing, used tube amps ever since and never looked back. So your Line 6 “models” a Tweed Bassman? Evidently, you’ve never played a Tweed Bassman!!!
Jack Dixon: I dont doubt it, but you know instruments like the guitar can sound better with added distortion, so this doesnt really apply to Hifi where you want the sound to be transparent.
@@suzesiviter6083 All good tube amps are super transparent, no audible distortion, what they actually call ''distortion'' is the non fatigue, sweet sound of tubes! Actually music sounds more real and live on tubes, especially jazz! But each to their own...
@@HASHEAVEN A good DSO will prove you wrong, Valves simply cannot go into the low THD figures a good bipolar or MOSFET amplifier produce; you prefer the sound and that's fine; but it is false to say you cannot hear the distortion relative to a good transistor design. Valves produce different types of harmonic distortion; this is one explanation why some people prefer Valves; IMO the warming up time and decreased life of tubes negates any small sonic advantage-but each to their own.
@@suzesiviter6083 I also like certain solid states like the simaudio moon, McIntosh, Accuphase and the clarity and detail of passlabs but those are all out of my reach. Maybe your are right but I certainly can't hear any distortion with my line magnetic, which I think sounds clearer and more detailed than many SS at it's price. Maybe what people call tube distortion is just the characteristic tube sound that I love... For ex I don't like the sound of an old SS Rotel receiver that I have, or a technics mosfet and a marantz of a friend and my LM 219 has better soundstage, detail bass midrange and more information on the highs than those, which for many people are good Solid state Amps.
@@HASHEAVEN Well whatever works for you, Valves do look sexy. I still have the old Pioneer A400 which was raved about in the 1980's; I haven't wished for an upgrade yet. Some of those old Amps can still keep up or better todays amps, the A400 for instance used custom silicon on the output transistors-which is rare on all but the most expensive amps even today. My biggest mistake was getting rid of my old Linn LP12; that had a certain magic and yes you can argue Vinyl has higher distortion; but the sound was just so much more enjoyable than a CD; so I know what you mean.
They often look great those tube amps. But personally I wouldn't purchase any. Simply axplained why, stated in this video. Thanks again for yet another good upload Paul.
Thank you for sharing, very interesting and informative, just uploaded a few of my hand crafted tube Amps. I enjoy learning more about the world of tube Audio!
There will always be tube amps that are made to sound “tubey” and transistor amps that sound “transistory”. From what I can hear though, the best of tubes and transistors are sounding more alike. As they get closer to the ideal they are converging toward each other as well. I do think the ultimate synergy will probably be the tube input-transistor output approach. Each device doing what it does best.
I always said the control signal in tubes is higher than the audio signal. In solid state the control is lower than the audio signal. So when you pump up the volume on ss devices, the audio signal seeps into the control, then you get bad clipping.
Being a tube guitar amp player of many, many years, it seems to me that tubes in the power section of an amp is what gives it its "balls". I understand, to some point, how tubes have a "softer,rounder" clip in the pre amp stage, but these hybrid amps that have a tubes(s) in the pre amp, and ss power, sound just as bad as all ss. Put a ss preamp in front of a full tube power amp, and you are mostly there. Of course, all tube is best, but man i am getting too old to carry around a 95 pound 2x12 combo. I would love to find a ss amp that actually delivers.
Not really a valid argument. most guitar amplifiers are designed to colour the sound. They are a part of the overall instrument. Seems to be some confusion as to warm reproduction and accurate reproduction Not possible to have both as the warmth is distortion. it might sound good but it aint HIFI
I don't consider amplifiers according to the devices, which are used to made them. Even a chip amp like a LM386 can sound very pleasant, if its surroundings are designed in the right way. A TDA2050 can sound very good, and my favorit, a 2STW100 / 2STW200 Darlington BJT boosted AD820 precision op amp which sounds outstanding neutrally and good. At last it is physics that matters. Imagine if they've never found solid state amplification. I am sure we would have today tubes which are comparably neutral like BJTs and FETs. The main difference what I have found in tube amplifiers compared to BJT and FET amplifiers is caused simply by the required slew rate of voltage. Tubes are in general relatively slowly devices. And, especially in output stages, they have to handle enormous voltage variations per unit of time, because tubes are unfortunately design to handle low currents and high voltages. So, from the viewpoint of slew rate, it is easy to outperform a tube with a transistor, which can handle low voltages and high currents. Another problem of modern tube amplifiers is, that literally "antique" devices (or devices, which are build according to designs which are 70 years old) are used to make them. In principle one could develop modern tubes, or even integrated vacuum circuits, with performance data, which are much better adapted to state of the art audio amplifiers.
I'm thinking we've been around for about the same number of years, as one of the telltale signs is our dismay for acronyms and buzzwords. Here's a warning sign to lookout for: When your conference rooms are given cutesy names like "Independence Hall", or "Town Square", it's time to put your foot down. 😃 Great video(s) - all of them.
**Curt Chase** (1 year ago) ua-cam.com/video/PbJ1GZMi_ho/v-deo.html&lc=UgjUXSty8DmVrHgCoAEC "This tube VS transistor debate will go on and on for ever! I am 61 years old and grown up in that transition from tubes to transistors. My 7th grade science project back in 1968 was comparing tubes to transistors in audio amplifiers and I made it state competition! Although my project was centered around the mechanics more than the sound, I will admit there is fairly determinable difference in the perceived sound between the two. Transistor amps are very "straight forward" in the quality of audio output. As long as it's not clipping, the signal hitting the speakers is pretty much a clone of the input, just stronger. That's one reason an audiophile may say the trans amp sounds hard, harsh, gritty, etc. On the other hand, tube amps have the natural ability to "smooth" things over. Soften the blows, add those sweet sounding harmonics that gives the sound a flavorful pleasantness audiophiles and guitarists love. Reason? Just the way a tube circuit works has a lot to do with it. The output transformer that pretty much is mandatory in a tube amp plays a big part in producing that smooth warm sound. Remember, it's a magnetic field that is the medium used to couple the output tubes to your speaker! The magnetism sort of processes the sound in a way that actually distorts it, but in a way that is pleasing to the ear! Crazy, huh? BTW....This info is MY take on this. Generated from 50+ years toying with all kind of amps. Thanks for reading!" *Just-cross-posting* I liked what he had to share, so sharing here. -delgoogle
Very nice brother, it's very true that the valve or tube amplifier pleasant to hear but that time in 1968 there was transformer in transistor amplifier also. But however the valve amplifier very pleasant sounds.
Great Videos Paul! You have cleared up some understanding of gear and how things work! Thank You for making these videos. If i get out to CO. I will be paying yall a visit!
Hey Paul,, Great channel, just find out... Q comes... What does optical class A amp means?? As in Denon poa 6600 mono blocks. İt is not a real class A amp, is it? .
The sound we listen to is what we pay for. We have to set it up to please ours ears. Which one sounds best to me may not be the best sound for you. I pay for the performance I want to hear, not the "best' specifications. Some people can't hear any differences to justify a price, but some buy because of better specifications. I listen to what I buy, if I don't hear a better, more pleasing performance I take it back. When I sit down to listen to music I use my tube amp, when the music is just to fill a vacuum I use my solid state amp.
Why is it every time I watch this video, the famed Stereophile Bob Carver Amp Challenge comes to mind??? I'm sure many here recall the challenge to make a Carver mid-fi amp duplicate the sonics of a storied hi end amp, in this case a Conrad Johnson model costing several times the cost of the Carver amp. With several hours of tweaking, eventually the 'golden ears' conceded that Carver had in fact reproduced the sound of the reference amp. Never have learned which brand of speakers referred to they used that were so hard to drive??? Carver admitted his unmodified amps do sound different than the reference amp because he tunes them to what he personally prefered and felt would work best with the range of speakers his customers would most likely be using rather than the difficult load speakerse the testers provided. Myself, I've gone thru several SS (NAD and Carver receivers w/wo the Sonic Hologram) and tube combos from tweaked Dynaco amps to the current setup of a Rogue Magnum with KT120's into Vandersteen Model 2 Signatures. I have to admit that both the NAD and Carver receivers had a pleasantly warm sound for hours of listening without listening fatigue that plagues so many solid state units. Not exactly tube like but not far off either. As you mention, you and other manf's are producing tube front end coupled to SS power amps, combining the best of both worlds. Are we approaching the listening nirvana we've long hoped for?? Time will tell...
Sorry, but this does not explain WHY tubes sound different to transistors. Is it possible to measure the difference in sound quality, to prove it exists? Right now I'm not convinced. By the way, I currently use a cheap Chinese made T-Amp which sounds excellent, to replace a Marantz Class A Amp which was large and heavy and gave off a lot of heat. How about a video on "Class D" T-Amps?
The reason tubes sound different from any solid state device is due to dynamic loss... though with certain MOSFET power devices this loss is shared with that of the tube stage(s) ... that's ALL it is !!
Tubes have filaments, they glow red when heated. In presence of oxygen it will oxidize. They fill the tube with a type of innert gas to last long time.
One interesting thing I have noticed empirical. If you replace one BJT with another in an amplifier, the sound will be more or less the same even if the transistor is of another brand and have other specs( within reasonable limits ). But if you replace a tube with another one, the sonic imprint usually is totally changed. That is what I call interesting. And a bit of a mystery.
vacume tubes surley will be sounding different every second they are played . Or am i wrong and they wear out in stages. Come to think of it it dosnt even need to be used as some deterioration is happening due to contaminents that remain in a non perfect vacume??
What about the difference in distortion? That is the primary reason WHY they sound different. Tubes produce even harmonics whereas transistors produce odd harmonics. Also, transistors have hard clipping whereas tubes have soft clipping. Their frequency response curves are also different. That is what gives tubes their "warm" sound.
Linear characteristics of tube small signal amplifier is reason for difference in sound of tube compared to semi-conductor transistors. Noise characteristics. Harmonics. Response. Yes, in theory the devices are likely to sound different - but probably not significantly. For audiophile their is always spiritual relationship to tube amps to consider - tubes sound better because of psychic vibration of filament in vacuum.
To most that ive met in the sound room, tubes are warmer, softer than solid state. But tubes wear out,must be replaced- not always so easily done. In the long run, tubes are way more expensive, run hotter, and just need a whole lot more effort. Some think tubes are worth the better sound vs the convenience of solid state. Then again, spend enough money,putting in the time to research past exaggerated claims and too high prices, solid state can sound very, very good.
I put new tubes in my preamp around 1980 and replaced them several years later and heard no difference and I'm still using the same tubes today. So tubes can last a very long time. Not output tubes in an amp of course.
I had that problem in the early 1970s. I was using Dynaco Mark III mono blocks in my system and the output tubes needed replacement about every two years. The KT-88 originally were about $8.00 each in matched pairs, but the price doubled every two years, so I purchased a used Marantz Model 15 power amp. It was also mono block construction and sounded great, but it kept giving me red lights while playing through my AR-3a speakers. These speakers were rated at 4 ohms and it was lower at some frequencies, so I finally got a Marantz Model 250 which I still use.
Tubes (we here call them "valves") will round off the top of the wave of an over-driven signal, rather than the precise clipping of solid-state devices . This gives a more pleasing sound than the harsh harmonics of squared-off waves. This point is of more relevance to guitar amplification than to hi-fi reproduction, but I do wonder about this affect on hi-frequency transients. Anyhoo - I always enjoy your videos!
There are 2 things that make tubes sound different. THD in tubes is a lot more musical and tube compression allows things that shouldn't happen and is more pleasant than hard clipping.
A tube amp and transistor amp should sound identical if well designed, equal output, and operated within their linear specifications. If you start to drive them out of non-linearity, all bets are off.
Transistors are switches. Valves are not. Even though you can't "hear" the difference, the switching action of a transistor is still perceived by the brain. Negatively. If you don't believe it, try it. Sit in a chair while video recording your face. Listen to two hours of your favorite music at the same level first via a transistor system then a valve system. The transistor system will cause a tiring effect. The valve a calming effect.... Well unless your favorite music comes from the Head Banger genre. I have had many people say I'm a liar and that there is no way I can hear the differance in the two. Head to head I have yet to not hear the differance. If you can't, seek medical attention. This is a tecnology that should still be in every home audio and Tv. It's like how they rate the clarity of flatscreen Tv's with #'s like 1280xwhatever, the old crt's are rated unlimited. Hook an old Zenith system 3 to your computor with a proper converter and you'll piss on your flatscreen. Indestry just found a product they could make for a fraction of the cost yet sell for the same price with half the livespan. When computors first got popular you could not find a converter for a Crt Tv. You could cajigger one from a reciver modual but nothing was for sale. Untill most all Crt's had been replaced. Funny that. It's almost like they didn't want people to see the differance.
The first computers used vacuum tubes as switches. Later, the transistor took that job but it's not correct to think of them as a switch. They are valves every bit as much as a vacuum tube. They are completely linear in the same way a tube is. The fact you get fatigued from listening to them is not nothing - and there's plenty of reasons for that. However, calling them (or thinking of them) as a switch is not among the reasons.
![If you can't hear this then you're not an audiophile [See description for link to followup video]](/img/n.gif)
I was a Hi-Fi snob. But some time ago I realized I was listening more and enjoying it less. I envied people who had what I considered crap systems, but who got great enjoyment out of listening. I had my moment of truth; I was chasing my tail, I wasn't listening to MUSIC anymore, I was listening to THE EQUIPMENT! That's two different things. The whole point is the enjoyment of music. It's one thing if your equipment is defective, but does one need to spend$5,000, $10,000, $20,000 or more before they can start enjoying music? Don't get me wrong, of course I would love to have that $50,000+ system with a room to match. I'm just saying, don't get lost, and don't miss the point of all this, which is THE ENJOYMENT OF MUSIC.
Well said, it's called the law of diminishing returns.
MrMinathecat You are so right. In fact I have been an audiophile for over 35 years and have always noticed that most audiophiles listen to music that sounds good on their systems and not necessarily the music they like best.
I also used to play with audiophile systems but not anymore. It's good to listen to that excellent systems but I found myself enjoying various music not recorded up to audiophile or even HiFi standard. I just enjoy more music than the quality of the reproduced sound. If it's good music, you can feel it's good music, no matter how good it was recorded and reproduced out of the speakers. The players have put their souls in the piece already and the audience can absorb the messages musicians wanted to convey. Most musicians I know do not care much about their listening systems. They usually use whatever they can find to enjoy music and they can still distinguish the good, the mediocre, and the bad pieces meticulously.
I still have my hi-end system but I'm not playing around with it anymore. Just consider it as an excellent system to play recorded music sometimes I want to enjoy a better quality.
a couple of grand worth spent should get you a good sound system.
Personally, (just my opinion) a $5,000 - $10,000 hifi system will give you some very good musical experience, regardless of genre.
Spending more will give you some improvement, but not much.
Thanks for posting this Paul. Much appreciated. Both you and I are men of a certain age. I am a vacuum-tube enthusiast. I have a few vintage-1962 Dynaco ST-70's and a few Dynaco PAS-3 preamps that I've kept alive for 40+ years. Thanks again for your expert explanation of tubes vs. transistors.
I've been waiting 25 years for that, lol. I really appreciate it. That was the simplest, most concise explanation of valves vs solid state I've heard.
To the guy who dosent understand how it effects sound: remember that voltage = PSI (roughly) running at higher voltages creates a higher share of linearity for the signal. The more linearity, the more headroom. More headroom allows for broader soundstage (x&y), faster reactions to peaks and lows, it adds some warmth (although a good SS amp that's good and warm and running in the meat of it's powerband is hard to beat)
and definitely "puts less strain" on the signal b/c of the exponentiated section of linearity on offer to the signal.
Thanks for this kind comment. Glad I could help.
TRUTH to tell, they LOOK cool. Something nostalgic about that warm glow makes me feel good.
I used vacuum tube Zenith Cobramatic all thru college. Acid Rock like Cream,Jethro Tull,etc sounds like 1968
"Something nostalgic about that warm glow makes me feel good."
===
I was packed off to boarding school in the late 1960s and took my Dad's cast-off tube audio gear with me. A number of my music-loving classmates had similar stuff. All our parents had the latest shiny transistor equipment but it didn't sound so good to us.
Over the years I have had some really nice solid state gear but 25 years ago I built my first single triode power amp. It felt like "coming home" and is still my first choice, despite the more costly solid state gear I have lying around. Built to satisfy rather than impress...
@@TheRealWindlePoons Does this satisfaction lies in the ritual, the tradition or anything else that has more to do with some social aspect than the music itself?
@@mignotmaxime2409 No. Not Ritual. Not tradition. Not social.
The single triode amplification stage has a natural presentation I have seldom found elsewhere. But its ALWAYS about the music. Otherwise, what's the point?
@@TheRealWindlePoons Thanks. I just read the 10 biggest lies in HiFi by Peter Aczel who says tubes do not sound different. I was wondering if the preference for tubes could be elsewhere than the music. Not necessarly a bad thing but it is the case, it must be clearly stated.
cool, I always liked the way old vacuum tube radios sounded when I was a kid. As an kid/teenager during the 1960's We guys use to hangout and go everywhere with our little 9 volt transistors. Happy to hear that the vacuum tube has not gone the way of the horse.
Yes, true said
Yes, they sound different, but "different" doesn't necessarily mean better. In fact the coloration added by Tubes (pleasant or not) is often referred to as "good distortion"
Tubes are used in the recording studio too. Some microphones use Tubes to warm the sound. And Jazz & Blues guitarist use Tubes for the sound they produce when over driven. I'm going to kick my own ass for saying this, but Tubes can make certain digital recordings sound better to our ears, BUT it greatly depends on what's being recorded.
Wrong ..............tubes are not warm sounding , only if not correctly implemented or wrongly used, clearly you don't know about vacuum -tube technology and that's a fact ............
Frank Geeraerts
We use Tube mics in the studio to to warm or smooth an instrument. The terminology is just geek speak as long as its understood during sessions. Vocals can sound very nice with Tube pre's ... The Hi-Fi world is rather different. I wouldn't use Tubes in my system as they're not needed.
And Frank, think about how you reply 😉
Chris Bishop its obviously a joke comment
Frank, tube amps MAY sound "warmer" if they're single-ended design, in which case you get a noticeable portion of the 2-nd harmonic (over -60dB), which does sound somewhat pleasant. You don't get that effect from a push-pull design.
Chris Bishop if
Audio Research went back and forth between tubes and transistors in their amps and preamps and their tube designs were always better. Warmest sounding amp I have is a transistor amp made in Norway but it gets hot as a stove. Tubes don't really have a warm sound. But what they do have is a lack of that hard edge sound of alot of transistor amps have.Everything colors sound but tubes tend to sound more like the real thing.
Class A amplification always sounds better, even if it is solid state. JVC had some really good amps that were super cheap (less than $100) , but they had poor speakers. I suppose they quit making them, but need to check. If done properly, class a/b is really good. Conrad Johnson tube amps and krell amps do this. Amps and Preamps that use a combo of tubes and solid state have some real promise. CJ had a full class a pre that cost the first born and what was left of the wife.
Two reasons tubes sound different, one is soft saturation, tubes can operate into a long saturation curve, two is that output is "almost" always through a transformer with hysteriesis distortion.
When newer fet amps are designed to sound like a tube amp these "distortions" are programmed into the design.
I have been learning about guitar overdrive circuits and your videos have been much more useful than almost anything else I have read or viewed. Thank you!
I love tube amplifiers and equipment. I still have my pair of Fisher 30 watt 80az amplifiers I found in the 1990s, and 400c preamp. All tube, from the late 1950s and fun to learn on and to service. I love listening to all my favorite music on it. Anything my heat desires. It’s been one of the most pleasurable discoveries in life for me. One thing you’ll notice, as you grow older, your hearing changes and you’ll start missing some of the effects and subtleties that make hi fi so fun. My ears in my late 40s aren’t what they use to be. Is why young ears are so wonderful. Anyway I love my tube stereo. Cheers!
The disclaimer at 7:00 is pure gold. Great video. Thanks very much!
I did not study any of those thing. Thanks for make me to understand a so complicate system as a tube . I’m 52 years old ,and my childhood , I remember that we have to change the tubes in different electricdomestic artifacts.
Yes they are different, BUT you never got to the WHY they sound different.
3rd harmonic distortion
@@joeking1019 I agree that at high signal levels that tubes clip differently than transistors, and this leads to differences in harmonic distortion. But in the video Paul claims that they sound different even when each is operating in their linear ranges. And in their linear ranges there should not be any harmonic distortion. Distortion only occurs in the non-linear ranges. Which leaves me wondering, who's correct, Paul or the people he claims are full of "you know what"? Perhaps it has more to do with the source impedance differences Paul mentions, and how those interact with the speaker? I'm not sure.
@@willdejong7763 Perhaps it is just a condition of being amplified through a vacuum tube, not necessarily driven to distortion, it was when I was younger and really into electronics and guitar amps that I learned about the 3rd harmonic produced in the tube, so I guess that just stuck as I've never heard a claim otherwise.
@giri kotte it's not worth an argument if you offer nothing to back it up,
@giri kotte it could be both, this is from wikipedia
Total harmonic distortion (THD)
Music material contains distinct tones, and some kinds of distortion involve spurious tones at double or triple the frequencies of those tones. Such harmonically related distortion is called harmonic distortion. For high fidelity, this is usually expected to be < 1% for electronic devices; mechanical elements such as loudspeakers usually have inescapable higher levels. Low distortion is relatively easy to achieve in electronics with use of negative feedback, but the use of high levels of feedback in this manner has been the topic of much controversy among audiophiles.[citation needed] Essentially all loudspeakers produce more distortion than electronics, and 1-5% distortion is not unheard of at moderately loud listening levels. Human ears are less sensitive to distortion in the low frequencies, and levels are usually expected to be under 10% at loud playback. Distortion that creates only even-order harmonics for a sine wave input is sometimes considered less bothersome than odd-order distortion.
Output power
Output power for amplifiers is ideally measured and quoted as maximum Root Mean Square (RMS) power output per channel, at a specified distortion level at a particular load, which, by convention and government regulation, is considered the most meaningful measure of power
I commend Paul for not using the " transconductance curve " words.... He did a great job of describing whats going on without "loosing" the folks watching.
BRAVO !
sbf
Hmm...that actually gives insight
what I like about the tube, is the ambience it brings into the music. have it on DAC and pre amp, although still using solid state power amp.
I believe that there are two major CAUSAL differences: (1)Tube amplifier distortion curves cross the cutting point of X and Y axis in a signal level/distortion graph. In other words, the lower the volume, lower the distortion. Thus at very low signal volume there is practically zero distortion. The transistor amplifier curve does not cross the meeting point of X and Y axis. The amplifiers never reach zero distortion. In some the distortion even increase at low volumes. Thus we always get some tangible distortion.
(2) The noise levels of tube amplifiers are very low, specially at low volumes. The transistor always has some noise, so signal to noise ratio suffers at low signal levels.
The audiophilic ears are extremely sensitive to distortion (and of course everyone can hear noise). That is why tube amplifiers sound so silky smooth and favored by audiophiles.
I have heard that transistors tend to emphasize odd order harmonics, while tubes emphasize even order harmonics. Is this true? If so, why is that the case? Thanks for your great videos by the way, I'm learning a lot!
Love your videos, my personal experence is they are all awesome, and both sound good in their own ways, and good for different types of music. I personally love tubes, from their slow warm up times to just simply how they work, to the sound they produce etc. Keep up the good videos :)
For me the biggest difference (as a guitar player) is the harmonics when distortion is present. The harmonics are frequencies that are added to the original signal. I don't know why but tubes produce even order harmonics which means that these new frequencies are higher octaves of the original signal. On the other hand transistors produce odd order harmonics which results in frequencies still dependent on the original signal but with in a different musical note.
I started with tubes and when transistors came along, the major diference was the power curve and noise floor. Tubes have a much softer gain curve, and can amplify well past their max power limit and liniarity to the point of melt down. The resilting odd harmonics are easyer on the ear.
Trensistors' sharper saturation point gives even harmonics (square waves) harsh on the ear when over driven.
The design solution was to operate transistors well below saturation and prebias above the noise floor.
Field effect transistors do act more like tubes, and as a result designers can now "program" amplifiers to sound like a tube amp.
The odd harmonics you describe are from push-pull circuits which cancel out even harmonic distortions and apply equally to solid state and tube amps. (Perhaps you meant EVEN harmonics?)
The even harmonic distortions from a single tube power amp closely match the human ear. The brain interprets this distortion pattern as being louder, hence these tube amps sound louder than they measure.
The sharp clipping distortion patterns from solid state gear is mostly down to the comparatively large amount of global negative feedback used. Pentodes have similar problems (plenty of gain at the expense of linearity). With simple speakers and triodes you can get away with no negative feedback at all. You get a natural sounding amp with dreadful measurements...
@@TheRealWindlePoons very true said, always misguided the issue by the uneducated people. Thanks brother
Sir
Thank you for your knowledge and patience to try to explain the the very complex theory of electronics and sound
You are in my opinion the best of what UA-cam can offer
Thank you for what you do
I’m truly a real fan
Great rundown on the differences. The generality is mostly correct. Enhancement Mode Field Effect Transistors do have very low input current in the DC area and can be operated with electrostatic charges. The difference here between them and vacuum tubes is a grid in a vacuum tube has very low capacitance as it is thin wire physically spaced away from everything else. In a Enhancement Mode FET, the gate capacitance is quite high, and even worse changes with voltage as the depletion region changes distance creating a distortion that tubes don't have. For this reason, FETs have to run with relatively high amounts of negative feedback and do not sound the same as tubes in low or no feedback applications. MOSFETS are best used as either switching devices in inverter power supplies such as automobile high power amps, or as output transistors with high levels of feedback to control linearity.
Bipolar Junction Transistors, have various amounts of linearity depending on the device. Some are very linear and make great output stages in a classic AB biased push pull output stage with little feedback for linearity. The family of curves on these transistors can be seen when driven on a vintage Tektronix curve tracer. Some have excellent linearity over a family of current steps.
www.valuetronics.com/product/370a-tektronix-curve-tracer-used?gclid=EAIaIQobChMIgsi3497s3AIVj19-Ch2jpQLQEAQYAiABEgKBFPD_BwE
Our shop has one. Unfortunately the voltage step range is often exceeded by more modern MOSFETS with higher gate voltages. It would be nice if they updated the instrument to include modern MOSFETS. Some MOSFETS require more than 3 volts gate to begin conducting.
I like tubes. They keep me warm in the winter!
Interesting you mention that idea. I remember having a colour TV, bought way back in 1971, that had some tubes in it. It was in a small room and when it was on and the door closed it did a nice job of warming the room in the colder months of the year. I remember we would say our show is coming on soon, time to start up the heater!
Good thing there are guys still around who dig messing with all of this stuff. Personally, I'll take most anything decent and try to make it sound good myself, but I can understand the hotrod aspect of playing with this stuff
Pierre Marcoux is a legendary audiophile in Quebec. He's been testing audio equipment for local manufacturers like Oracle. Here's what he told me : Tubes have distorsion on pair harmonics and transistors, on impair harmonics... Even though tubes have much higher distorsion level, it's not relevant because pair harmonics distorsion is not audible because of phase cancellation. In other words, the distorsion cancels itself, which is not the case with transistors. Transistors distorts on impair harmonics, which are audible. That's why transistors require feedback sent in the signal. While this lowers distorsion, it also removes some musicality. There were two other differencs, but I forgot what they we're... sorry!
Depending on the tube preamp and associated equipment in my experience tube front end mated to a solid state power amp produces a huge three dimensional sound stage with unmatched harmonics, especially in the mid range, that blow away solid state preamps. Voices, string instruments, reed instruments and pianos sound, to my ear, much, MUCH better than solid state gear. The price paid is loss of transient response, loss of bandwidth and a higher noise floor. But once ya hear tubes it's hard to go back to solid state.
Build something from the late lamented Allen Wright's "Tube Preamp Cookbook". No shortage of transient response or bandwidth there (although he does use FETs too).
@@TheRealWindlePoons the drawback is the amount of heat tubes produce...
@@vincentl.9469 If we're talking line stage preamps, a 4 tube amp will dissipate about 30 watts maximum. Is that too much heat? It isn't for me but your mileage may vary.
The bottom line for the difference in tonal characteristics between valves and transistors is that valves tend to distort with a preponderance of even harmonics, and transistors tend to distort with a preponderance of odd harmonics. The even harmonic distortion is more musical because it is consonant with the original sound, whereas the odd harmonics are dissonant with the original sound.
If you are always driving valves or transistors as a class A device and they remain _entirely_ within their linear range there should be no audible distinction between them because there should be no distortion of any sort.
The differences occur when you drive them outside of their range of linearity, especially if you drive them either to the point of saturation or to turning off.
The point of tubes is using them outside their range of linearity in order to create 'euphonic' low order distortion.
@@danaustin5869 That is one way to use valves. Many folk are more interested in eliminating distortion entirely.
They sound different because they are different.
Thanks Paul, that really cleared things up.
As an amature, the problem is that whenever I get to hear tubes - it's always on vinyl and horn loaded full range speakers.
And when I listen the polar opposite it's: active speakers, DSP crossovers, class D playing Qobuz bit perfect FLAC 192/24 with full Dirac Live (like the Dynaudio Focus 50).
So I think my idea of a "tube sound" is very much colored by the rest of the setup usually used.
Add to that, the tube stack is playing some austere Kari Bremnes and the "tech stack" is playing Dream Theater or Tool.
thanks sir for all of these videos, there is alot of myths around this stuffs and what is better than that to see someone with practical experience explain it, every time you upload a video i can see i learned alot from it.
About 40 years ago an electronic technician I worked with who was also a musician, explained his simplistic rationale for the difference in sound. His take was that the heated filaments in the tubes would vibrate while being played. The variations in frequencies from the instruments imparted vibrations to the filaments of the tubes. This caused minute and constant changes in the flow of electrons between the various internal parts of the tubes. Solid state devices, having a different internal structure, lack the parts which enable the tubes to make the sound they do. 40 years ago, musicians were still talking about the sound that could only be found in a tube amplifier.
Its difficult to imagine resonance being a factor; if you compare the length of the valve elements with the wavelength of sounds at high frequency, @ 20Khz for example the wavelength is 17mm- maybe effects only the large valves?
I think you explain that quite well, from an electrical/ electronic point of view, harmonics play a big part in how many circuits work and how components interact, a slight variation in the right part of a circuit can make a huge difference to the output stage. A good and simple example of the harmonics effect can be found in computer networks... if you consider the plug into the wall powerline network adapters, they work by using high frequencies to send signals on cables already carrying electricity at lower frequencies (50 or 60 Hz), in modern telephone exchanges and fibre optic networks, this is done using MUX/ DMUX (multi plexer) systems where many frequencies can be sent as waves or pulses of light down the same cable/ fibre without interfering with each other.
I have 2 Marshall guitar amps, a small solid state 15W practice amp that has a tube effect setting, it uses FETs and sounds pretty good and a 1978 SL100 series 1, it uses 4 tubes, 2 in the preamp and 2 larger ones in the power amp stage, I always joke that it sounds warmer, because the tubes have "heaters" used to excite the electrons, fact is, it does sound warmer, it has a natural distortion, even when playing "clean".
Mr Carlson's Lab (UA-cam channel) has a good video on how tubes work).
T B, they where almost certainly talking about power amplifiers. Especially amps made for electric guitars where you deliberately drive the tube amp way out of the linear spectrum. You get tons of distortion from the amp, but its the kind of distortion they wanted.
That is really far from what you want in a HiFi system where the idea is to reproduce the music as it is on the recording.
Any kind of distortion your system adds will give a "sameness" on all music reproduced.
With that said I should also say that a great clean producing HiFi system also lets makes all the badly recorded material very evident. It can often be to the point where you will avoid listening on badly produced material.
Does that take the joy out of listening?
I would say both yes and no. The best recordings will sound amazing and you will really enjoy them more. The bad recordings tend to be hard to listen to. If you still want to listen to them (and I do) the easiest way is to have another much cheaper system where you listen to them, e.g. i the car.
@@Rohan4711 Great post, especially your reference to the cheaper system.🙂
This whole thing cracks me up. I'm a guitar player. I've used my old Peavey guitar amp on gigs and had other guitar players come up to me and say "... man, that thing sounds great.... that must be a tube amplifier... " I like this because I'm using a relatively inexpensive amp, that has no tubes in it. In fact, the whole amp (which is all discrete, no ICs) has only one FET in it. The rest of that transistors are bipolar junction types (BJT transistors.) Peavey was cleaver in that they did use an audio transformer on the output, which helps to add just a bit of tube like "mud" into the sound. This amp was a cheap amp, to begin with (and I've replaced some parts with parts from a surplus store, occasionally) and that's what makes is especially amusing when guitar players mistake this for a tube amp. After I reveal that this is a solid state amp, I say to them: If tubes, alone, made for audiophile level listening, every table radio from the 30s, 40s and 50s would be audiophile quality... and we know that ain't true.
I thought I knew a lot about audio and now I learn something new!
Yep FET's and JFET's are very close to Tube smoothness ! That's why use them in my guitar overdrives. Transistors are Faster, that makes them great in front of a tube guitar amp.
Nice explanation Paul. Anyway, yes they sound differently. But the main reason are the output transformers with their hysteresises and the slew rate. Due to the high value of the tube setup, they sound differently and gives you the warm feeling only tubes can give you. Signalwise on the paper go with BJT or with FETs if you like.
Howdy. I'm with you.
In my mind. Also the magnetization of the transformers play a role. It is not linear.
Regards.
Everybody talks about frequency response when evaluating components or, in this case, tubes vs transistors. Linearity is related, for sure, as a nonlinear device will introduce harmonics. It’s easy to understand and the test is (relatively) easy to conduct. Input a sine wave and measure the output.
But music isn’t a simple collection of continuous sine waves (keyword “continuous”). It is dynamic. From a drum beat to the pluck of a guitar string, every note is dynamic, that is, changing over time. Ever watch the vue meters on an amp? The ability of the gain stage (tube or transistor) to track these changes without distorting or running out of gas is critical.
Tubes are voltage gain devices, almost no current draw on the input. Since no current flows, I suspect the tube is faster and better able to track the dynamics of the signal.
Tubes in the winter and chips in the summer - that’s my deal. I like the sound of both.
You certainly reinforced the fact THAT they do, but not so much WHY they do.
Richard Larson yes he did. Did you watch the video?
He said one is a voltage amplifying device and the other is a current amplifying device. It's the nature of how they operate that causes them to sound different.
ThePapabear2012 : Transistors aren't ever actually current amplifiers, that was just a scheme they came up with to escape a patent on FETs.
The difference in sound comes down to differing harmonics, filtering, and biasing: if you bias a transistor or a tube correctly, then apply input, output, and feedback filtering correctly, then you CAN have them sound the same. The trick is that people don't go to sufficient effort to achieve the result (effectively, you're building a specialized analog computer for the purpose of simulating the "target sound": possible, but not necessarily worth the trouble).
ThePapabear2012 Jared Maddox uhhh... what? Amplifier manufacturers have been trying to make solid state amps sound like tube amps for decades (guitar amps, for example) and yet still there is a consensus among guitar players that tubes have a much richer, and therefore different sound.
Tubes and transistors have very different physics, and very different sound characteristics. The current flowing in a tube does so in a near-vacuum, where the current in a FET flows through doped silicon. Tube current is controlled by a grid voltage, which produces an electrostatic force on the electrons which acts mostly parallel to the path of the electrons, whereas the FET modulates the charge between its source and drain terminals via a voltage applied at the gate which produces an electric field laterally to the path of the electrons, forming the channel between drain and source. As the poster mentioned, tubes operate at much higher voltages and temperatures than transistors as well, and of course the differences go on and on.
They are two different ways to achieve the same goal but they do so differently, this is why they sound different.
William Ashland : And those characteristics (except for voltage, which can be handled if you're willing to spend the money) only matter because of their effect on the input characteristics (what are the input impedance characteristics, in essence), and output signal, which means that they can be simulated, including by analog semiconductor circuitry. The stuff you mentioned is all relevant to the designer of a device, but once a signal has passed through that device the effect no longer matters.
sir are the vaccume tube sounds loud and clear like the qsc rmx series??
Hi, I only understood that they are different. But, what is difference in sound between tubes and transistors, are tubes better at providing low frequency response?
I researched Tubes and found that a scientific comparison had been done in a Lab. The results were most subjects prefered the music that was amplified by tubes. They said it was because of the fact that tubes have inherently a more natural distortion and that is more pleasing to our ears. So the report stated simply: The human ear preferes the distortion and final tones that tubes produce.
May we have a link to this study?
My thoughts are that the human brain has the ability to determine if the input its getting is real or a facsimile.
I think this is the core of the tube or transistor, analog or digital debate.Analog audio and tubes are a closer reproduction of the original ,even with its technological flaws.
I was at Fin's old gas station spot in Baker when those wings came in. Helped drag them across the yard
8:25 "anybody who will tell you that [three devices] ... running at the same [specified parameters] ... do not sound different because they don't _measure_ different ... is [wrong]"
You never did explain exactly how or why in detail. I'm still not sold on the argument that tubes > transistors.
But my focus is on the "measurement" itself. If instruments have finer precision and better resolution than the human ear ... and they "measure the same" ... then how can the things they measure "sound" different to the human ear?
Exactly.
yes tubes wear out but no one says you have to buy a tube amp with a large number of expensive tubes. i use a musical paradise set tube amp that takes all types and finding 2 new output tubes every couple years is not pricey and i find it fun. plus i can alter the sound 'quality' by using different types.
Each sounds good in its own way. Manufacturers of SS and Tube gear have successfully bridged the gap in differences in the quality of sound. The only real difference left between the two types of designs is that tube gear lacks the juice SS does when cranked up which is a serious issue for me.
Good video explaining how tube amps work in the general sense. Though, I was distracted by the chirp of the smoke detector every 30 seconds or so. I kept counting the seconds till the next chirp.
Thank you Paul for explaining it in lay terms, really appreciate the time you put into the videos. All the best in reaching your target.
Thanks Paul
The real difference between tubes and MOSFETs are the input capacitance. And the internal impedance due to the load. And not to forget - tube amplifiers needs an output transformer to match (e.g.) an 8 ohm speaker, with the limitations (or advantages) hence to this fact.
Thank you for all of your most informative videos. Wonderful stuff you share. Very grateful!
Tubes sound different but they also measure different. You can of course claim something to sound different without measuring different just by not measuring what makes the difference. Tube amps are usually clipping the peaks softly and you get more musical distortion (even harmonics) than some hard clipping transistor amp. A simple FFT measurement or square wave comparison can easily prove this difference.
germanium tranistors had a tube like sound. my magnavox receiver has germanium transistors so it has a warm tube-like sound
I hope I don't sound unpleasant but it doesn't sound as if this Paul fellow really understands tube electronics deeply enough.
simple, tubes produces even/odd harmonics adding to the signal bec. it operates to be heated to function (filament/heater connections - 6.3v, etc.), whereas transistor/solid state
device just needs some biasing in a fraction of a current in milliamps or millivolts. tubes plates voltages requires very high voltages (100v, 200v - or >1kv) defending on kinds of output tubes used in an amp and it's topology or design, i.e. single-ended or push-pull, class A, etc.....................
rationally cool description of hot tubes in right places (although I vote for precision opamps too), tnx ))
simply Illustrated with a clean presentation ...... Yanking effect still strives when it still comes to Music ;)
I think you said even if the data shows the plots the same they still sound different and if so I find it hard to believe. I am curious if you ever did a blindfold test lol and how you did? Would be interesting. I use mosfets to pwm control motors so was wondering if you do that with speakers? If so you could linearize if needed or closed loop servo as well which is what we do. Or you could make a lookup table to replicate the tube response. Would love to know. Thanks for the video!
Thanks for your informative videos Paul! I am enjoying them and learning lots of new things as I go. Cheers!
Valves are voltage-controlled devices. Normal transistors are current-controlled devices. FET transistors (Field Effect Transistor) are controlled in the same way as valves - by voltage.
Valves/tubes often use push-pull transformers which is where a lot of the "bad" distortion is cancelled.
This is almost always overlooked.
The thing is that most music producers will make make it so the sound that we ear has tube sound being played by solid state amps... which renders all this discussions immaterial.
Think less is more. What worked in the past works today. I am a converted tech head and realized the error of my ways. There is nothing like a good LP through a tube and some great speakers. It's a ritual , it pays homage to many decades of refining the design and it sounds natural and musical. There were engineering Giants in sound in those days. Newer seldom means better in the world of hi-fi.
Perhaps I missed something. I'm 66 years old, have owned nice hi-fi equipment most of my life. I didn't get how they sound different from one another? What exactly is it that makes them sound different? I know tubes are supposed to have a "warmer sound," maybe "smoother" or "rounder" are better terms. What are we hearing precisely?
It still needs to increase gain of and more high-pass filter of your microphone.
Amplifiers with tubes do not sound better unless you compare a High fidelity tube amplifier with a cheap solid state amplifier or you have a distorted way of listening the sound with a lot of nostalgia. The fact is, for the same frequency response band 20 to 20khz +or- 1 db 20 watts , into the same speakers in the the same room, you can evaluate the difference in the sound, it is the same but the equipment will be smaller and more efficient solid state vs. tubes , make the test as I have done decades ago.
Tubes do sound differently. I have a 1957 The Fisher model 80T Hi-Fi mono AM/FM tuner and preamp. In addition to treble and bass control it has four loudness levels. I connected it to a solid state integrated amplifier. Whenever I want to listen to old hi-fi jazz or blues recordings, I use the 80T. The sound is far richer and warmer than that of the solid state own preamp, although it is mono. The technicians of The Fisher went to great lengths to have a hi-fi preamp with very low noise floor and great Dynamic Range. The four levels of loudness allied with the treble and bass controls provide the best audio configuration. This 80T preamp and tuner also came with a power amplifier which also has it's own four level loudness control. I haven't used yet, because I have to figure out a way of commuting the speaker boxes from my solid state strereo equipment to this mono power amplifier and vice-versa.
Howdy. One possible explanation.
In a BJT the collector current is dependent only of the base current and the gain factor. Collector voltage has no effect on the collector current. Within usable limits, of course.
Tubes are different. The anode voltage will have some effect on the anode current. The gain factor is not a constant. The gain factor will be smaller at high signal when the anode resistor causes the anode voltage to be lower. This is an inherent compressing property of tubes. It introduces the third harmonic to the signal.
Regards.
Research "Early voltage."
@@marianneoelund2940 Hi. Blimey.
I stand corrected. The collector current is truly slightly dependent on the collector voltage. Thanks for the correction.
In high regards.
thanks for your explaination paul
Tubes and Bipolar Transistors sound different because they operate by completely different principles, the word "Transistor" is short for the devices full name "Transfer-Resistor".
They are not so different as you might think, not when you get down to the electron level; its still an approximation of a little guy opening a gate.
@@suzesiviter6083 Yeah true, but tubes are mainly voltage-amplifier devices whereas solid-state transistors are mostly current-amplifier devices, yes there are Fets (Field Effect Transistors) and MOSFETS (Metal Oxide Semiconductor Field Effect Transistors) that operate very similar to the way a tube operates.
I’m sorry everybody but, when my 45 watt Solid state guitar amp was in the shop 40 years ago, I borrowed a buddies 6 watt Fender champ. That 6 watts of tube tone blew my 45 watt SS watt amp out of the water! I ditched that thing, used tube amps ever since and never looked back. So your Line 6 “models” a Tweed Bassman? Evidently, you’ve never played a Tweed Bassman!!!
Jack Dixon: I dont doubt it, but you know instruments like the guitar can sound better with added distortion, so this doesnt really apply to Hifi where you want the sound to be transparent.
@@suzesiviter6083 All good tube amps are super transparent, no audible distortion, what they actually call ''distortion'' is the non fatigue, sweet sound of tubes! Actually music sounds more real and live on tubes, especially jazz! But each to their own...
@@HASHEAVEN A good DSO will prove you wrong, Valves simply cannot go into the low THD figures a good bipolar or MOSFET amplifier produce; you prefer the sound and that's fine; but it is false to say you cannot hear the distortion relative to a good transistor design. Valves produce different types of harmonic distortion; this is one explanation why some people prefer Valves; IMO the warming up time and decreased life of tubes negates any small sonic advantage-but each to their own.
@@suzesiviter6083 I also like certain solid states like the simaudio moon, McIntosh, Accuphase and the clarity and detail of passlabs but those are all out of my reach. Maybe your are right but I certainly can't hear any distortion with my line magnetic, which I think sounds clearer and more detailed than many SS at it's price. Maybe what people call tube distortion is just the characteristic tube sound that I love...
For ex I don't like the sound of an old SS Rotel receiver that I have, or a technics mosfet and a marantz of a friend and my LM 219 has better soundstage, detail bass midrange and more information on the highs than those, which for many people are good Solid state Amps.
@@HASHEAVEN Well whatever works for you, Valves do look sexy. I still have the old Pioneer A400 which was raved about in the 1980's; I haven't wished for an upgrade yet. Some of those old Amps can still keep up or better todays amps, the A400 for instance used custom silicon on the output transistors-which is rare on all but the most expensive amps even today. My biggest mistake was getting rid of my old Linn LP12; that had a certain magic and yes you can argue Vinyl has higher distortion; but the sound was just so much more enjoyable than a CD; so I know what you mean.
They often look great those tube amps.
But personally I wouldn't purchase any. Simply axplained why, stated in this video.
Thanks again for yet another good upload Paul.
Thank you for sharing, very interesting and informative, just uploaded a few of my hand crafted tube Amps. I enjoy learning more about the world of tube Audio!
There will always be tube amps that are made to sound “tubey” and transistor amps that sound “transistory”. From what I can hear though, the best of tubes and transistors are sounding more alike. As they get closer to the ideal they are converging toward each other as well. I do think the ultimate synergy will probably be the tube input-transistor output approach. Each device doing what it does best.
Thanks brother from India
I always said the control signal in tubes is higher than the audio signal. In solid state the control is lower than the audio signal. So when you pump up the volume on ss devices, the audio signal seeps into the control, then you get bad clipping.
Being a tube guitar amp player of many, many years, it seems to me that tubes in the power section of an amp is what gives it its "balls".
I understand, to some point, how tubes have a "softer,rounder" clip in the pre amp stage, but these hybrid amps that have a tubes(s) in the pre amp, and ss power, sound just as bad as all ss.
Put a ss preamp in front of a full tube power amp, and you are mostly there.
Of course, all tube is best, but man i am getting too old to carry around a 95 pound 2x12 combo.
I would love to find a ss amp that actually delivers.
Not really a valid argument. most guitar amplifiers are designed to colour the sound. They are a part of the overall instrument. Seems to be some confusion as to warm reproduction and accurate reproduction Not possible to have both as the warmth is distortion. it might sound good but it aint HIFI
I don't consider amplifiers according to the devices, which are used to made them. Even a chip amp like a LM386 can sound very pleasant, if its surroundings are designed in the right way. A TDA2050 can sound very good, and my favorit, a 2STW100 / 2STW200 Darlington BJT boosted AD820 precision op amp which sounds outstanding neutrally and good.
At last it is physics that matters. Imagine if they've never found solid state amplification. I am sure we would have today tubes which are comparably neutral like BJTs and FETs.
The main difference what I have found in tube amplifiers compared to BJT and FET amplifiers is caused simply by the required slew rate of voltage. Tubes are in general relatively slowly devices. And, especially in output stages, they have to handle enormous voltage variations per unit of time, because tubes are unfortunately design to handle low currents and high voltages. So, from the viewpoint of slew rate, it is easy to outperform a tube with a transistor, which can handle low voltages and high currents.
Another problem of modern tube amplifiers is, that literally "antique" devices (or devices, which are build according to designs which are 70 years old) are used to make them. In principle one could develop modern tubes, or even integrated vacuum circuits, with performance data, which are much better adapted to state of the art audio amplifiers.
The slew rate of the device always skips in our minds. Thanks for the things.
Tubes produce 3rd harmonic distortion which gives that 'warm' sound
I'm thinking we've been around for about the same number of years, as one of the telltale signs is our dismay for acronyms and buzzwords. Here's a warning sign to lookout for: When your conference rooms are given cutesy names like "Independence Hall", or "Town Square", it's time to put your foot down. 😃 Great video(s) - all of them.
**Curt Chase** (1 year ago) ua-cam.com/video/PbJ1GZMi_ho/v-deo.html&lc=UgjUXSty8DmVrHgCoAEC
"This tube VS transistor debate will go on and on for ever! I am 61 years old and grown up in that transition from tubes to transistors. My 7th grade science project back in 1968 was comparing tubes to transistors in audio amplifiers and I made it state competition! Although my project was centered around the mechanics more than the sound, I will admit there is fairly determinable difference in the perceived sound between the two. Transistor amps are very "straight forward" in the quality of audio output. As long as it's not clipping, the signal hitting the speakers is pretty much a clone of the input, just stronger. That's one reason an audiophile may say the trans amp sounds hard, harsh, gritty, etc. On the other hand, tube amps have the natural ability to "smooth" things over. Soften the blows, add those sweet sounding harmonics that gives the sound a flavorful pleasantness audiophiles and guitarists love. Reason? Just the way a tube circuit works has a lot to do with it. The output transformer that pretty much is mandatory in a tube amp plays a big part in producing that smooth warm sound. Remember, it's a magnetic field that is the medium used to couple the output tubes to your speaker! The magnetism sort of processes the sound in a way that actually distorts it, but in a way that is pleasing to the ear! Crazy, huh? BTW....This info is MY take on this. Generated from 50+ years toying with all kind of amps. Thanks for reading!"
*Just-cross-posting* I liked what he had to share, so sharing here. -delgoogle
Very nice brother, it's very true that the valve or tube amplifier pleasant to hear but that time in 1968 there was transformer in transistor amplifier also. But however the valve amplifier very pleasant sounds.
Great Videos Paul! You have cleared up some understanding of gear and how things work! Thank You for making these videos. If i get out to CO. I will be paying yall a visit!
Now I want a tube pre-amp.
I love this guy. Wish I could would with you guys! EE degree over here !
Hey Paul,, Great channel, just find out... Q comes... What does optical class A amp means?? As in Denon poa 6600 mono blocks. İt is not a real class A amp, is it?
.
The sound we listen to is what we pay for. We have to set it up to please ours ears. Which one sounds best to me may not be the best sound for you. I pay for the performance I want to hear, not the "best' specifications. Some people can't hear any differences to justify a price, but some buy because of better specifications. I listen to what I buy, if I don't hear a better, more pleasing performance I take it back. When I sit down to listen to music I use my tube amp, when the music is just to fill a vacuum I use my solid state amp.
Why is it every time I watch this video, the famed Stereophile Bob Carver Amp Challenge comes to mind???
I'm sure many here recall the challenge to make a Carver mid-fi amp duplicate the sonics of a storied hi end amp, in this case a Conrad Johnson model costing several times the cost of the Carver amp. With several hours of tweaking, eventually the 'golden ears' conceded that Carver had in fact reproduced the sound of the reference amp. Never have learned which brand of speakers referred to they used that were so hard to drive???
Carver admitted his unmodified amps do sound different than the reference amp because he tunes them to what he personally prefered and felt would work best with the range of speakers his customers would most likely be using rather than the difficult load speakerse the testers provided.
Myself, I've gone thru several SS (NAD and Carver receivers w/wo the Sonic Hologram) and tube combos from tweaked Dynaco amps to the current setup of a Rogue Magnum with KT120's into Vandersteen Model 2 Signatures. I have to admit that both the NAD and Carver receivers had a pleasantly warm sound for hours of listening without listening fatigue that plagues so many solid state units. Not exactly tube like but not far off either.
As you mention, you and other manf's are producing tube front end coupled to SS power amps, combining the best of both worlds. Are we approaching the listening nirvana we've long hoped for?? Time will tell...
Sorry, but this does not explain WHY tubes sound different to transistors. Is it possible to measure the difference in sound quality, to prove it exists? Right now I'm not convinced. By the way, I currently use a cheap Chinese made T-Amp which sounds excellent, to replace a Marantz Class A Amp which was large and heavy and gave off a lot of heat. How about a video on "Class D" T-Amps?
TAKE A BASIC ELECTRONICS COURSE
The reason tubes sound different from any solid state device is due to dynamic loss... though with certain MOSFET power devices this loss is shared with that of the tube stage(s) ... that's ALL it is !!
Tubes have filaments, they glow red when heated. In presence of oxygen it will oxidize. They fill the tube with a type of innert gas to last long time.
Light bulbs are filled with inert gas. But tubes need vacuum to function properly, as they are moving electrons across a gap.
One interesting thing I have noticed empirical.
If you replace one BJT with another in an amplifier, the sound will be more or less the same even if the transistor is of another brand and have other specs( within reasonable limits ).
But if you replace a tube with another one, the sonic imprint usually is totally changed.
That is what I call interesting. And a bit of a mystery.
vacume tubes surley will be sounding different every second they are played . Or am i wrong and they wear out in stages. Come to think of it it dosnt even need to be used as some deterioration is happening due to contaminents that remain in a non perfect vacume??
What about the difference in distortion? That is the primary reason WHY they sound different. Tubes produce even harmonics whereas transistors produce odd harmonics. Also, transistors have hard clipping whereas tubes have soft clipping. Their frequency response curves are also different. That is what gives tubes their "warm" sound.
Linear characteristics of tube small signal amplifier is reason for difference in sound of tube compared to semi-conductor transistors. Noise characteristics. Harmonics. Response. Yes, in theory the devices are likely to sound different - but probably not significantly. For audiophile their is always spiritual relationship to tube amps to consider - tubes sound better because of psychic vibration of filament in vacuum.
Can’t take my eyes off the dog here lol
To most that ive met in the sound room, tubes are warmer, softer than solid state. But tubes wear out,must be replaced- not always so easily done. In the long run, tubes are way more expensive, run hotter, and just need a whole lot more effort. Some think tubes are worth the better sound vs the convenience of solid state. Then again, spend enough money,putting in the time to research past exaggerated claims and too high prices, solid state can sound very, very good.
I put new tubes in my preamp around 1980 and replaced them several years later and heard no difference and I'm still using the same tubes today. So tubes can last a very long time. Not output tubes in an amp of course.
you are right , good tubes are too expensive
I had that problem in the early 1970s. I was using Dynaco Mark III mono blocks in my system and the output tubes needed replacement about every two years. The KT-88 originally were about $8.00 each in matched pairs, but the price doubled every two years, so I purchased a used Marantz Model 15 power amp. It was also mono block construction and sounded great, but it kept giving me red lights while playing through my AR-3a speakers. These speakers were rated at 4 ohms and it was lower at some frequencies, so I finally got a Marantz Model 250 which I still use.
Tubes (we here call them "valves") will round off the top of the wave of an over-driven signal, rather than the precise clipping of solid-state devices . This gives a more pleasing sound than the harsh harmonics of squared-off waves. This point is of more relevance to guitar amplification than to hi-fi reproduction, but I do wonder about this affect on hi-frequency transients. Anyhoo - I always enjoy your videos!
There are 2 things that make tubes sound different. THD in tubes is a lot more musical and tube compression allows things that shouldn't happen and is more pleasant than hard clipping.
Soft vs
Sharp saturation and cutoff points.
what kind of microphone is that on your desk?
A tube amp and transistor amp should sound identical if well designed, equal output, and operated within their linear specifications. If you start to drive them out of non-linearity, all bets are off.
Transistors are switches. Valves are not. Even though you can't "hear" the difference, the switching action of a transistor is still perceived by the brain. Negatively. If you don't believe it, try it. Sit in a chair while video recording your face. Listen to two hours of your favorite music at the same level first via a transistor system then a valve system. The transistor system will cause a tiring effect. The valve a calming effect.... Well unless your favorite music comes from the Head Banger genre.
I have had many people say I'm a liar and that there is no way I can hear the differance in the two. Head to head I have yet to not hear the differance. If you can't, seek medical attention.
This is a tecnology that should still be in every home audio and Tv. It's like how they rate the clarity of flatscreen Tv's with #'s like 1280xwhatever, the old crt's are rated unlimited. Hook an old Zenith system 3 to your computor with a proper converter and you'll piss on your flatscreen. Indestry just found a product they could make for a fraction of the cost yet sell for the same price with half the livespan. When computors first got popular you could not find a converter for a Crt Tv. You could cajigger one from a reciver modual but nothing was for sale. Untill most all Crt's had been replaced. Funny that. It's almost like they didn't want people to see the differance.
The first computers used vacuum tubes as switches. Later, the transistor took that job but it's not correct to think of them as a switch. They are valves every bit as much as a vacuum tube. They are completely linear in the same way a tube is. The fact you get fatigued from listening to them is not nothing - and there's plenty of reasons for that. However, calling them (or thinking of them) as a switch is not among the reasons.