The Data Link Layer, MAC Addressing, and the Ethernet Frame

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 6 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 68

  • @BijouBakson
    @BijouBakson 4 роки тому +34

    This is probably the most detailed course on the subject that I have seen yet

  • @republicgreenfather3068
    @republicgreenfather3068 4 роки тому +11

    Excellent Sir, I never seen such a wonderful Explanation with Best Presentation.Thank you Sir Great Job

  • @SixAstron
    @SixAstron 11 місяців тому +1

    Very well structured and presented. Thank you

  • @iwktwom
    @iwktwom 4 роки тому +1

    A uni exam tomorrow and this is fantastic, thanks for the brilliant content.

  • @mantid83
    @mantid83 Рік тому +1

    Going to watch all your videos. So detailed and I needed it badly!

  • @steveromanchuk4966
    @steveromanchuk4966 2 роки тому +1

    I love it, the best explanation of the Data Link layer I've ever seen!

  • @Hypocrisy.Allergic
    @Hypocrisy.Allergic 3 роки тому +2

    this is the course for the curious guys who really want to handle all the info, i love it, even though it s a bit too advanced, i find it challenging

  • @zulauk
    @zulauk Рік тому +1

    Wow this is the best way I've ever heard this explained, thanks for such a well thought out video.

  • @dannyuwu3741
    @dannyuwu3741 2 роки тому +1

    Great video! I used it to review for my networking exam. Keep it up!

  • @Oomtet
    @Oomtet 2 місяці тому

    After this video I have a better understanding of the technology, Thank you..

  • @petersu4869
    @petersu4869 4 роки тому +1

    Bravo, excellent explanation of data link layer

  • @danielschiffers9696
    @danielschiffers9696 3 роки тому +1

    I love your video's! To the point, detailed and fun to watch.

  • @Benadamsonn
    @Benadamsonn 3 роки тому +1

    Great and amazing explanation, well done danscourse

  • @judeleon8485
    @judeleon8485 3 роки тому +1

    This is marvelous, well explained

  • @hawkeye4659
    @hawkeye4659 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for your hard work.

  • @zafranullah8328
    @zafranullah8328 5 років тому +1

    Very detailed and brilliantly explained.

  • @ninjahunter2199
    @ninjahunter2199 4 роки тому +1

    dd an exam u helped me nail it..thnk u

  • @dkmpala1835
    @dkmpala1835 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for the video, found it very easy to follow.

  • @Charles-xd6lw
    @Charles-xd6lw 5 років тому +1

    Excellent video. Thanks. I love your work.

  • @Limegreenslice
    @Limegreenslice Рік тому

    Great and very informative video!!

  • @Olavotemrazaodenovo
    @Olavotemrazaodenovo 4 роки тому

    Congratulations from Brazil.

  • @bernardgarrett3897
    @bernardgarrett3897 5 місяців тому

    I just want to add the 3 in 802.3 came from the fact that the guys from Digital Intel and Xerox were sitting at Table 3 of a restaurant (the Wagon Wheel) in San Jose, when they came up for the specification. The rest is history.

  • @dave1b
    @dave1b 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks a lot. Great video!

  • @samucancld
    @samucancld 2 роки тому

    Buenísimo loko

  • @yassinabdulla368
    @yassinabdulla368 3 місяці тому

    thanks it was really helpfull

  • @James_Knott
    @James_Knott 2 роки тому +3

    The preamble is used only on 10 Mb. On 100 Mb and faster, a different coding method is used and some reserved symbols are used to delimit the frames. Same with the inter-packet gap. Also, frames are no longer limited to 1500 bytes. That's an artifact of the original Ethernet and then by 802.3 using the Ethertype field for length. With DIX ll, it's Ethertype. Frame expansion appeared in the late 90s and now, with jumbo frames, 16K can be used, IIRC. You could have mentioned that if Ethertype/length is 1500 or less, it's an 803.2 frame and 1536 or greater for DIX ll. IP uses DIX and about the only thing that currently uses 802.3 is spanning tree. Other protocols that used to use it are now obsolete.
    A good reference is Ethernet The Definitive Guide, from O'Reilly and, for a bit of history, you might want to download the Ethernet Blue Book (Gordon Bell), which goes into the original DIX protocol, before DIX ll & 802.3.

    • @Parkhill57
      @Parkhill57 Рік тому

      So basically, this video is completely obsolete.

    • @James_Knott
      @James_Knott Рік тому +3

      @@Parkhill57 Well, not completely obsolete, but a lot has changed.

    • @freddyhardware840
      @freddyhardware840 Рік тому

      @@James_Knott I hope someone like yourself or the original creator of this video will explain it with updated info. I have a logistics background and would understand things better if explained in logistics form.

    • @James_Knott
      @James_Knott Рік тому

      @@freddyhardware840 I'm really not sure what you're asking for or how logistics would apply

    • @franchise2570
      @franchise2570 10 місяців тому

      Are you sure about this? The preamble isn’t part of the frame, but has always been used to indicate the start of the frame for synchronization. No where have I heard or read that this has changed, for Ethernet II or 802.3. If so please provide proof.

  • @zachfenton608
    @zachfenton608 2 роки тому

    This is awesome thanks

  • @kapilramanujancbse
    @kapilramanujancbse 2 роки тому

    Hi How about a data payload greater than 1500 bytes is transmitted. So how does the fragmentation happen?.

  • @robertolin4568
    @robertolin4568 4 роки тому +1

    Doesn't CD in CSMA/CD mean Collision Detection (instead of Collision Recovery shown in the first slide) ?

  • @shadowworks4380
    @shadowworks4380 4 роки тому

    I have on queation is it posible to have a working phone of pc whithout a mac adres and stil acces the internet ?

  • @potheeswaran4494
    @potheeswaran4494 2 роки тому

    Can you tell me why the destination address comes first in this ethernet frame? By default source address is first and then only the destination address. What is the logic behind this?

  • @wally19
    @wally19 2 роки тому

    wait, if you have a 42-1500 bytes w/802.1Q how do you get 1522?
    I think that its always "min 46 max 1500" then you have 18bytes from the eth frame or 22 with the Eth frame w/802.1Q
    Without 802.1Q: 64-1500 + 18 = 1518
    With 802.1Q: 64-1500 + 18 + 4 = 1522

  • @KirinChan1998
    @KirinChan1998 3 роки тому

    yessirrrrr!!! Thanks for this.

  • @JuiceManTech
    @JuiceManTech 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the video. What layer would you say the DHCP server works on?

  • @draakoss1492
    @draakoss1492 10 місяців тому

    Perfection

  • @olekristianrannekleiv762
    @olekristianrannekleiv762 3 роки тому

    is frames made before flow control at the data link layer?

  • @markganus1085
    @markganus1085 2 роки тому

    is ethernet frame header the same as ethernet frame? if not, which fields are different?

  • @edinetgrunhed6000
    @edinetgrunhed6000 3 місяці тому

    this is it!!!

  • @danielnyman2656
    @danielnyman2656 3 роки тому

    I understand that VLAN-tagging (TPID + PCP + DEI + VID) is inserted before the EtherType field, but can someone explain when “0x8100 VLAN-tagged frame” is used in EtherType field?

    • @Hypocrisy.Allergic
      @Hypocrisy.Allergic 2 роки тому +1

      it is used when you have multiple vlans, if you have only the default vlan it is assumed all the frames go to the default vlan, when you enter the comman encapsulaion dot1q :vlan number: command it is when you basically tell that subinterface for instance, to be the subinterface responsable for that specific vlan. you can exercise this with wireshark and see the standard ethernet frame, and the ethernet frame when it is tagged.

  • @mosabkhedeer7694
    @mosabkhedeer7694 3 роки тому

    Good job thank you

  • @careditor
    @careditor 3 роки тому

    Is all this coded in the shell? ....I am a brand new newbie to IT Support and a little confused....

  • @gullejannat6756
    @gullejannat6756 4 роки тому

    hey, did you guide me if there are 1510 bits to be sent over ethernet how many would it take? 2?

  • @ahmadullahazizi3038
    @ahmadullahazizi3038 4 роки тому

    Are these videos in this playlist are updated? I means CCNA 200-301?

  • @majiddehbi9186
    @majiddehbi9186 5 років тому

    very interesting and Clair thx

  • @narfastaroth2320
    @narfastaroth2320 4 роки тому

    Gracias!!

  • @thomasturner1739
    @thomasturner1739 10 місяців тому +1

    Is this still current in 2024?

  • @ye_nope
    @ye_nope 5 років тому

    Thanks again !

  • @soulyt25
    @soulyt25 Рік тому

    🐐

  • @milotxh
    @milotxh 4 роки тому

    love your video's do u have any online classes for CCNA am working on my rectification

  • @SAMARTBO
    @SAMARTBO 3 роки тому

    thanks.

  • @joedoe9134
    @joedoe9134 5 місяців тому

    wow .🤯

  • @majiddehbi9186
    @majiddehbi9186 Рік тому

    i wonder if u are still actve Sir we miss u re lessons

    • @danscourses
      @danscourses  Рік тому

      I am still here Majid. What video topics are you interested in?

    • @majiddehbi9186
      @majiddehbi9186 Рік тому

      @@danscourses haapy to hear from you Sir you the first who initiated me to networkin just to tell ou i recently passed my CCNA 200-301 AND NOW I M PREPARING FOR CCNP ENCOR I WAS JUST WONDERING IF YOU COULDN4T HELP ME OUT WITH THIS JUST BY SOME ADVISES OR THOUGHTS THX FOR ALL

  • @professoreno3139
    @professoreno3139 5 років тому

    Hi Dan, can you share this PowerPoint or diagram? As always, thank you for sharing your knowledge...

    • @danscourses
      @danscourses  5 років тому +7

      Yes! I just added the link to the slides in the video description but here it is also: drive.google.com/open?id=19vnT21JflhCMenQNKeCJ4P_OdlJu29mP

  • @einarsdandens8961
    @einarsdandens8961 4 роки тому

    Hello vhat open wrong internet adress

  • @marksummers463
    @marksummers463 3 роки тому

    way too detailed useless give an over view thn graduallu add details

    • @NUVOILLUSR5671
      @NUVOILLUSR5671 2 роки тому +1

      Sure if he was trying to explain this to attempt to help you transition from whatever level of knowledge you have, he could have done an overview and recapped on essential concepts but this is far from useless