Why You Can't Recycle Your Pants (Until Now)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 вер 2023
  • Have you ever recycled a T-shirt? You might be able to soon. Lots of clothing is made from cotton and polyester interwoven so closely that it’s impossible to separate them without destroying the cotton. In this episode, George tests a newly discovered technique that could solve that problem, potentially changing the way we use and get rid of our clothes.
    You might also like other Reactions videos:
    How Plastic Recycling Actually Works:
    • How Plastic Recycling ...
    Burning Forever Chemicals With Water:
    • Burning Forever Chemic...
    No, Your Microwave Isn't Trying to Kill You:
    • No, Your Microwave Isn...
    Super absorbent polymers:
    • Super absorbent polymers
    Can Plastic Be Composted?
    • Can Plastic Be Composted?
    Why is There Plastic in Our Rain?
    • Why is There Plastic i...
    Credits:
    Executive Producer:
    Matthew Radcliff
    Producers:
    Elaine Seward
    Andrew Sobey
    Darren Weaver
    Writer:
    George Zaidan
    Host:
    George Zaidan
    Scientific Consultants:
    Brianne Raccor, Ph.D.
    Jiwoong Lee, Ph.D.
    Yang Yang, Ph.D.
    Michelle Boucher, Ph.D.
    Executive in Charge for PBS: Maribel Lopez
    Director of Programming for PBS: Gabrielle Ewing
    Assistant Director of Programming for PBS: John Campbell
    This video displays proprietary technology developed by University of Copenhagen. Patent pending. The technology is undergoing development and is not yet commercially available.
    Reactions is a production of the American Chemical Society.
    © 2023 American Chemical Society. All rights reserved.
    Sources:
    Recycled Cotton | CottonWorks™
    cottonworks.com/en/topics/sus...
    Enzymatic textile fiber separation for sustainable waste processing - ScienceDirect
    www.sciencedirect.com/science...
    Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made | Science Advances
    www.science.org/doi/10.1126/s...
    Ab Initio Thermochemistry of Highly Flexible Molecules for Thermal Decomposition Analysis | Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation
    pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs....
    Denim Recycling Program | Madewell
    www.madewell.com/inspo-do-wel...
    Chemical Structure of Cotton Fibre - Online Textile Academy
    www.onlinetextileacademy.com/...
    Transacylation from Acid Amides to Amines Catalyzed by Carbon Dioxide | Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
    www.journal.csj.jp/doi/10.124...
    The Carbon Dioxide-Catalyzed Ester Exchange Reaction | Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan
    www.journal.csj.jp/doi/10.124...
    Carbon Dioxide-Catalyzed Stereoselective Cyanation Reaction | ACS Catalysis
    pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsc...
    CO2-Promoted Reactions: An Emerging Concept for the Synthesis of Fine Chemicals and Pharmaceuticals | ACS Catalysis
    pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acsc...
    CO2-catalyzed/promoted transformation of organic functional groups - ScienceDirect
    www.sciencedirect.com/science...
    Recycling of waste PET into useful textile auxiliaries - ScienceDirect
    www.sciencedirect.com/science...
    Hydrolysis of waste polyethylene terephthalate catalyzed by easily recyclable terephthalic acid - ScienceDirect
    www.sciencedirect.com/science...
    A CO2-Catalyzed Transamidation Reaction | The Journal of Organic Chemistry
    pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs....
    Catalytic Fabric Recycling: Glycolysis of Blended PET with Carbon Dioxide and Ammonia | ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
    pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acss...
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 97

  • @emmyali920
    @emmyali920 8 місяців тому +117

    As a former Chem student... this video scratched places in my brain that hadn't been scratched in decades. I now feel warm and fuzzy all over. Maybe it's the coffee.... maybe it's the chemistry? =)

  • @willemvandebeek
    @willemvandebeek 8 місяців тому +49

    I had no idea cotton fibres are just a bunch of linked sugar molecules. o_O
    Love this channel, keep up the good work! :)

    • @ImTHECarlos98
      @ImTHECarlos98 8 місяців тому +13

      That’s how a chemistry UA-camr made Cotton Cotton Candy

    • @tsingtak642
      @tsingtak642 8 місяців тому +17

      You can make moonshine from your pants

    • @MonkeyJedi99
      @MonkeyJedi99 7 місяців тому +4

      @@tsingtak642 That is a phrase that needs to be on a shirt. "You can make moonshine from your pants"

  • @michaelf7093
    @michaelf7093 8 місяців тому +38

    Speaking as a polymer chemist, (who pretty much only used NaOH to break down polyesters), this is pretty cool!

  • @alveolate
    @alveolate 8 місяців тому +8

    it's probably gonna still be years before this breakthrough reaction can be turned into some industrial scale recycling plant, right?
    it's still better to avoid fast fashion to begin with, imo. reduce > reuse > recycle.

    • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
      @ireallyreallyhategoogle 8 місяців тому

      Nah, just like all other "recycling" it will be only minimally used to pretend that we are recycling while still dumping nearly all trash.

  • @benjaminshropshire2900
    @benjaminshropshire2900 8 місяців тому +7

    Cutting edge chemistry R&D using anti-freeze and (part of) bakers ammonia. How cool is that?
    Side note: A few weeks ago it occurred to me that a mix of anti-freeze and ammonium bicarbonate/carbonate would make an interesting fuel for a warm (not hot) gas generator.

  • @X1Y0Z0
    @X1Y0Z0 7 місяців тому +4

    Unfortunately, the plastic industry’s ad campaign put the onus of recycling on end user. The plastic industry knew very little plastic could be recycled.
    It also allowed them to pollute the world😢

  • @johnford7847
    @johnford7847 8 місяців тому +12

    Amazing demonstration and a clear explanation. Thank you.

  • @carpemkarzi
    @carpemkarzi 8 місяців тому +3

    That was perfect. Theoretical to practical to backyard.

  • @kucami1
    @kucami1 8 місяців тому +8

    This is fun! I guess 7 hours is too long for a National Chemistry Week activity, so that's the reason I'm not sad this didn't come out in time for the Fabulous Fibers theme. I wonder if George can get the polyester back out afterwards???

  • @kevinmartin7760
    @kevinmartin7760 8 місяців тому +2

    I was a little confused by the first reaction, thinking that breaking ester bonds should yield equal numbers of carboxylic and hydroxyl ends. PET (what is shown in your diagram) is a copolymer of terephthalic acid (a dibasic acid) and ethylene glycol (a diol). In your reaction you show the terephthalic acid specifically as a product, and the "other stuff" would be the ethylene glycol, which is where all the hydroxyl groups from the reaction end up.
    In my particular field of interest it is the cotton that I'm interested in keeping, to recycle into rag paper.

  • @tomholroyd7519
    @tomholroyd7519 7 місяців тому +1

    It's blowing my mind too, so all the "wait what" moments are like, perfect timing ... wait ... umm

  • @ronkirk5099
    @ronkirk5099 4 місяці тому

    We will need many of these types of chemical processes if we are to accomplish a circular economy. As a retired engineer, I've always been fascinated with chemistry and your level of technicality in these videos is just the ticket for someone with my background. Keep up the good work!

  • @shoutitallloud
    @shoutitallloud 8 місяців тому +5

    Why not to make weight measurement of fiber pieces before and after reaction. And see if the weight loss is consistent to initial %fibers

  • @ka-mai
    @ka-mai 7 місяців тому +1

    I too use _chemistry jargon_ often!

  • @CrumpetsNBiscuits
    @CrumpetsNBiscuits 8 місяців тому +7

    Good ol' informative videos. Thank you so much for making these.

  • @spodefollower
    @spodefollower 6 місяців тому +2

    This was an awesome video, deserves way more views!! Shocked when I saw it’s only 18k!!!

  • @tsingtak642
    @tsingtak642 8 місяців тому +1

    The discovery is encouraging

  • @AliHSyed
    @AliHSyed 7 місяців тому +1

    Audio editing is on point

  • @johannan572
    @johannan572 8 місяців тому +2

    This gives me feelings of hope. Thx

  • @MrMash-mh9dy
    @MrMash-mh9dy 8 місяців тому +2

    The Gordian Knot and Alexander's solution bother me to no end whenever I hear it mentioned. Cutting it in half is not untying a knot therefore not a solution. In my mind, it is gangster tactics that say you will be next if you don't say I untied the knot. It is an example of making others submit through violence and intimidation or as they liked to say, might makes right. There is no great lesson to be learned other than you can make people say anything you want at the tip of a sword.

    • @thestic6349
      @thestic6349 8 місяців тому +3

      I mean, as far as I'm aware, that's kinda the point of the Gordian Knot story. Alexander utilized lateral thinking to "solve" the "problem" of the Gordian Knot. It just so happened his "solution" required an intimidation factor, but it still accomplished his goals; no one could argue with him because of his might, and with the knot cut, no one could one-up him by solving it "properly".
      The point is, there is a lesson to be learned, regardless of how unpleasant the method used in the story was: how to approach problems from new angles, by defining your goals/priorities, you can figuring out solutions other than the most straightforward one.
      Learn what lessons from what already has gone before, so the teaching methods don't have to be repeated with each new generation. Learn, history, doomed, repeat, etc.

    • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
      @ireallyreallyhategoogle 8 місяців тому

      Violence and the threat of violence has always been used to control people, and it is still being used everywhere by all governments.

  • @davejones9469
    @davejones9469 7 місяців тому +1

    I usually wear clothes until they're pretty much falling apart, then I cut them up to use as rags.

  • @KN-xl6lw
    @KN-xl6lw 7 місяців тому +1

    Would love to see a video on methanolyis of PET (water bottles) 😊

  • @Rungus27
    @Rungus27 8 місяців тому +9

    I wonder if there are any metallic type catalysts that could also be added in minute amounts to make the reaction work even better?

  • @jaymayhoi
    @jaymayhoi 7 місяців тому +1

    your channel is great!

  • @r6u356une56ney
    @r6u356une56ney 8 місяців тому +1

    Tons of old tshirts, towels, and other fabric items are bleached and reused as shop rags.

  • @Noneblue39
    @Noneblue39 8 місяців тому

    That is some fascinating chemistry

  • @LanceMcCarthy
    @LanceMcCarthy 8 місяців тому +1

    Excellent video! Moar!

  • @pauljs75
    @pauljs75 7 місяців тому +1

    Interesting, and it's a start. Now we just need some way to collect all the microplastics out of rinse water and the warm air exhaust of dryers. (Wouldn't surprise me if textiles is one of if not the biggest contributor to that particular problem.)

  • @dj_laundry_list
    @dj_laundry_list 8 місяців тому +6

    There are so many things that *can* be recycled, but the economics needs to be viable in order to do so. How is that going to work out for this?

    • @OneDeuxTriSeiGo
      @OneDeuxTriSeiGo 8 місяців тому +6

      well given that it's room temperature, CO2 is the catalyst, it works even if you dump the entire kitchen sink in there, and it only requires ethylene glycol (antifreeze) and ammonium bicarb (ammonia + CO2 + H2O), both of which are extremely easy/cheap to acquire and produce, and the resulting products are high quality, the economics are there. The concern is that the university is going to patent this tech and sell it to someone who is then going to overcharge out the ass for anyone wanting to actually recycle anything (which would delay practical use by people in the regions where this waste is dumped from cleaning up the waste for up to 20 years)

    • @ryuuguu01
      @ryuuguu01 8 місяців тому +6

      That is where charging for the destruction of the commons comes in. Right companies can destroy the commons for free, once you charge people for destroying parts of the commons (landfills, ocean dumping, pollution including CO2) these things become economical and there is an economic incentive for companies to make them even more economical.

  • @ahobimo732
    @ahobimo732 7 місяців тому +1

    We can recycle cotton. And we can recycle polyester. But if we mix them together, we can't recycle the blend.
    Crazy thought: Why don't we stop mixing them together?

  • @BritishBeachcomber
    @BritishBeachcomber 7 місяців тому

    Backyard chemistry is the ultimate fun...

  • @adamwishneusky
    @adamwishneusky 8 місяців тому +2

    so cool! and as always love the 🧠 stuff AND the 😆 stuff in your videos ☺

  • @plantsrcool228
    @plantsrcool228 7 місяців тому +1

    Well that's pretty neat!

  • @belg4mit
    @belg4mit 8 місяців тому +1

    Very cool chemistry, but what prevents one from converting the cotton in a blend into lyocell by dissolving it in NMMO? Seemingly that process would allow things t be separated. It's not strictly recycling since there's chemical transformation, but it's very close. It seems Scientific American published an interesting article on textile recycling last December.

  • @sagarnegi9464
    @sagarnegi9464 8 місяців тому +1

    Nice, it's good to know about something once in a while

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  8 місяців тому +3

      Especially something good about recycling....

    • @sagarnegi9464
      @sagarnegi9464 8 місяців тому +1

      @@ACSReactions That's right

  • @jogandsp
    @jogandsp 8 місяців тому

    A beast?? The mechanism for acid catalyzed hydrolysis of cellulose is like two steps

  • @KaushikAdhikari
    @KaushikAdhikari 7 місяців тому +2

    I hope this reaction is successfully
    tweaked to achieve better yields

  • @7hhunter.941
    @7hhunter.941 8 місяців тому +1

    Really the wonder of Chemistry is mind-blowing and so influential in the universe.

  • @meri7108
    @meri7108 8 місяців тому +2

    Hopefully we can switch over to a green source of ammonia soon!

    • @ChemEDan
      @ChemEDan 8 місяців тому +2

      urine luck

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  8 місяців тому +4

      Well since you mentioned it:
      ua-cam.com/video/dFcaEUj43OY/v-deo.html

  • @quinnobi42
    @quinnobi42 7 місяців тому

    Came here from tom scott. Good video. Just wanted to point out that the color grading on a lot of the footage looks a little grey and overexposed. Perhaps try turning down the exposure (probably best to do this in post) and try upping the saturation.

  • @fintux
    @fintux 7 місяців тому +1

    I was so confused at first, as I thought this was about recycling *plants* 😂

  • @Fireclaws10
    @Fireclaws10 7 місяців тому +2

    This is cool, but it's going to be used by the textile industry to greenwash stuff. They dump millions of newly produced garments into landfill every year to keep the value of their brand up, the don't put returned products back into the supply chain and dump those too. They need to be reducing, and we need to be re-using. This process, unless it gets to a truly humungous scale (which is won't), will not offset the current pile of waste.
    Cool chemistry, but not a real solution.

  • @sandrom511
    @sandrom511 8 місяців тому +1

    This could be used to produce Biodegradable surfactants and biodiesel!!!!

  • @ShirinRose
    @ShirinRose 7 місяців тому +1

    The reaction at 3:35 also blew my mind 🤯😂 I'm a little confused, though, by the monomer formed at 5:18 from nylon-6,6. The cyclic parts on the ends only have 4 carbons - where did the other two go that were in the polymer chain? Or did those 4 come from somewhere else entirely?

    • @internetuser8922
      @internetuser8922 7 місяців тому +1

      I was wondering the exact same thing about the cyclization there, wasn't expecting that.

  • @ejonesss
    @ejonesss 7 місяців тому

    this would be very useful where in the world of "fast fashion" where something is in fashion for hours or a day.
    why not make the clothing entire from polyester (no blending).

    • @Theballonist
      @Theballonist 7 місяців тому +1

      Most people find full polyester fabrics pretty unpleasant on the skin. Personally I go the other way, full natural fabrics until the problems with synthetics are actually solved. I also wear my clothes till they fall apart, make pretty visible mends, make rags from them when they can''t be used as clothing anymore, and almost never buy new. You'd be surprised at the quality of clothing that you can find second hand if you have the eye for it.

  • @Menon9767
    @Menon9767 3 місяці тому

    Okay now THIS is interesting

  • @samheasmanwhite
    @samheasmanwhite 7 місяців тому

    So, does cotton actually get recycled?
    I know a few things that use a bit but that seems like 0.01% or so.

  • @mr.bennett108
    @mr.bennett108 8 місяців тому

    I think Goodwill might have just bricked their boxers...

    • @ryuuguu01
      @ryuuguu01 8 місяців тому

      Reduce > Reuse > Recycle. Goodwill is higher on the food chain than recycling. 😀

  • @Sleepy_Joe
    @Sleepy_Joe 7 місяців тому

    Every heard of piranha solution?

  • @larsrummert7619
    @larsrummert7619 7 місяців тому

    The hydroxy groups aren't swapped

  • @ToTouchAnEmu
    @ToTouchAnEmu 8 місяців тому

    that's actually a huge deal

  • @ChemEDan
    @ChemEDan 8 місяців тому

    I'm so surprised that...
    I might need a new pair of pants.

  • @ArodWinterbornSteed
    @ArodWinterbornSteed 7 місяців тому

    As a Brit I read the title in a very different way 🤣
    What's wrong with my underpants?

  • @fuzzywzhe
    @fuzzywzhe 6 місяців тому

    People who know something about the recycling industry realize that most of what you put into those little blue bins, aren't recycled. I live in a city where they had mandatory recycling, but they wouldn't recycle anything, it all went to a landfill.

  • @tomholroyd7519
    @tomholroyd7519 7 місяців тому

    grab bag: but did they try a superbase > 15

  • @jogandsp
    @jogandsp 8 місяців тому

    ACS putting out a video where they mess up the mechanism for a transesterification is... not a good look for ACS lol.

    • @ACSReactions
      @ACSReactions  8 місяців тому +2

      We made a mistake and certainly could have just edited that out, but we thought it would be better to be honest. We take factual accuracy seriously, so if there's something we missed, please let us know.

  • @alexandrevaliquette3883
    @alexandrevaliquette3883 7 місяців тому +5

    What we really need, is an environmental tax for each product. Such tax will really cover the expense for the entire recycling process of each good.
    Some 100% cotton or 100% polyester might have a lower tax (ex 1$), but mix fibers sweater may have a 2000$ tax (yes, just for one t-shirt) because this is the real price to properly get rid of it at the moment.
    Same tax for all items, food, car, disposable/consumable, toy, diapers, etc.
    Off course, this is not very popular, so politics won't do it and we will continue to pass our shit to the next generation. Sorry grandkids!

    • @EnneaIsInterested
      @EnneaIsInterested 7 місяців тому +1

      But the study actually demonstrated relatively good recycling of mixed fibers? In a very low-cost way?

    • @alexandrevaliquette3883
      @alexandrevaliquette3883 7 місяців тому +2

      @@EnneaIsInterested we barely recycle paper. Not because technology doesn't exist, but because it's not lucrative enough.

    • @EnneaIsInterested
      @EnneaIsInterested 7 місяців тому +1

      @@alexandrevaliquette3883 but paper is biodegradable, also the reason why paper recycling isn't very lucrative is because countries kind of need to maintain industry in the rural periphery, so the price for new paper is artificially kept low in the process
      Unfortunately, your go-to example for opposition towards technological fixes is bad.

  • @abhayanand9585
    @abhayanand9585 Місяць тому

  • @larsrummert7619
    @larsrummert7619 7 місяців тому

    A lot happens at room temp

  • @youngchemist
    @youngchemist 8 місяців тому

    Nice jop 👍

  • @WowUrFcknHxC
    @WowUrFcknHxC 7 місяців тому

    Yellow chem happens at room temperature. 😒

  • @Dr_Larken
    @Dr_Larken 6 місяців тому

    Anyone knows this has always been possible, if they worn hand me downs!

  • @DeepStrike_lucky6
    @DeepStrike_lucky6 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm confused why you would put a priority on recycling cotton...... polyester, should be recycled........ ur avg polyester shirt was once a plastic coke bottle. lol cotton u can throw in the dirt.... it bio degrades easily and it comes from an abundant plant..

  • @puffinjuice
    @puffinjuice 6 місяців тому

    Why do they even make blends. I hate shirts that have 3% polyester. I CAN'T IRON OUT CRINKLES 😠

  • @alexandrevaliquette3883
    @alexandrevaliquette3883 7 місяців тому

    We don't even recycle paper and plastic properly. I think you are a bit overoptimistic.
    I'm in Montréal, a fairly great city, and all the paper is very contaminated with plastic. Very not efficient so far.

  • @Theballonist
    @Theballonist 7 місяців тому +1

    Wait, you didn't actually show what ingredients you put in the pot! Show your work.

  • @markofdistinction6094
    @markofdistinction6094 8 місяців тому +1

    So, can this reaction be used to recycle politicians into something useful?

    • @ryuuguu01
      @ryuuguu01 8 місяців тому

      As opposed to the usual solutions of burning them or burying them in landfills?

  • @mikespangler98
    @mikespangler98 7 місяців тому

    Polyester blend in a tee shirt? Ewe.

  • @brucecheesman2781
    @brucecheesman2781 8 місяців тому +1

    I think this video started off very well, but became very confusing because of the mistakes. If you discuss the reaction mechanism for the breakdown of polyester, you should do the same thing for cotton.
    As for the research group not finding the 1968 paper, possibly their literature survey was inadequate.
    I am a big fan of these videos as a former Ph.D. level chemist, but I feel this video should be redone. The subject material is excellent but the errors spoil it in my opinion.

  • @LuggageStardate
    @LuggageStardate 7 місяців тому

    Garbage belongs in a landfill, shirts like that help hold moisture and aid in the breakdown of stuff back into a energy resource like landfill gas.

  • @ireallyreallyhategoogle
    @ireallyreallyhategoogle 8 місяців тому

    English?
    Why You Couldn't Recycle Your Pants (Until Now)

  • @cassieoz1702
    @cassieoz1702 8 місяців тому

    Folks need to stop referring to separating rubbisk as 'recycling'. I doubt this will actually happen any time. Here we pretty much wear our clothes till they fall off us, then my husband's teeshirts are cut into plant ties. Fewer garments, longer use, no 'fast fashion', and use it until it's unusable.

  • @anothernate3302
    @anothernate3302 8 місяців тому +1

    I'm sorry. I'm sure the information on the video is cool. I'd like to know this stuff, but the way it was edited like a string of shorts that were stitched together is making me actually mad. No.