How to complete the square (when solving quadratic equations)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 гру 2023
  • Let's discuss completing the square method when we are solving quadratic equations! We learn how to solve quadratic equations in 9th grade algebra but when we cannot solve a quadratic equation by factoring, we will have to use either completing the square or the quadratic formula. In fact, there's a geometric meaning behind the term completing the "square".
    Shop my math t-shirts & hoodies on Amazon: 👉 amzn.to/3qBeuw6
    -----------------------------
    I help students master the basics of math. You can show your support and help me create even better content by becoming a patron on Patreon 👉 / blackpenredpen . Every bit of support means the world to me and motivates me to keep bringing you the best math lessons out there! Thank you!
    -----------------------------
    #math #algebra #mathbasics

КОМЕНТАРІ • 39

  • @bprpmathbasics
    @bprpmathbasics  7 місяців тому +5

    When should we use completing the square instead of the quadratic formula? 👇
    ua-cam.com/video/5Y3dVXigIBI/v-deo.html

    • @HeavenisnttooFarAway-
      @HeavenisnttooFarAway- 7 місяців тому

      What happens to the 25 that you added to the left hand side of the equation?

  • @earlthepearl3922
    @earlthepearl3922 7 місяців тому +41

    I have never seen this “box” approach to solving for X before. Pretty cool.

    • @muneebmuhamed43
      @muneebmuhamed43 7 місяців тому +4

      btw, the quadratic formula is derived using this. There's a video by "Mind Your Decisions". It's pretty old but explains it well.

    • @HeavenisnttooFarAway-
      @HeavenisnttooFarAway- 7 місяців тому +1

      Me neither, excellent video

    • @jaspertyler4557
      @jaspertyler4557 7 місяців тому +1

      i learned about completing the square in ordinary differential equations. the most confusing math class i've ever taken.

    • @samiunalimsaadofficial
      @samiunalimsaadofficial 5 місяців тому

      Get ready for PDEs​@@jaspertyler4557

    • @chocolateangel8743
      @chocolateangel8743 3 місяці тому +2

      It's called an area model. You can use them to do quite a few things. When you understand (and get practice with them), they really allow you to conceptualize things, so there is less to memorize.

  • @MurseSamson
    @MurseSamson 7 місяців тому +12

    Awesome. Thanks for the history video as well. I can see based on this how geometry lead to algebra, and eventually conundrums like "+- √x" that lead to the use of the plot graph solutions & proofs, and eventually, calculus.
    What a great video! Would love to see more of these historically contentious math terms!

  • @EverythingIsLit
    @EverythingIsLit 7 місяців тому +4

    This would have made it so much easier to conceptualize in school!

  • @Monitorbread
    @Monitorbread 4 місяці тому +1

    this is the best math channel ever and made understanding the whole completing the square so easily. thank you so much for making these cool videos

  • @kambaakapanga9629
    @kambaakapanga9629 4 місяці тому +1

    On point, not too much talking. Great video. Thank you

  • @EdwardCurrent
    @EdwardCurrent Місяць тому

    Brilliant explanation. I'm so jealous of kids today -- and teachers today! -- who can get these great explanations and learning methods at home for free. This geometric demonstration reminded me of 3blue1brown's geometric treatments of linear algebra. So cool.

  • @SeegalMasterPlayz
    @SeegalMasterPlayz 7 місяців тому +2

    This was also visualised in my Mathematics B Edexcel International GCSE study text.

  • @rigbyb
    @rigbyb 7 місяців тому +2

    You are the best math UA-camr 😊

  • @ratty_robloxian
    @ratty_robloxian 6 місяців тому

    Hey, I love your videos! You actually helped me pass my maths exam with a random exercise, and I thank you alot!!
    (keep the good work up, love ur channel🔥🔥💯)

  • @malforon4893
    @malforon4893 7 місяців тому

    Very helpful, thanks

  • @RoachRider666
    @RoachRider666 7 місяців тому

    Interesting analysis

  • @toffeetheskunk6319
    @toffeetheskunk6319 5 місяців тому +1

    damn who knew that actually explaining the concept instead of just listing steps aimlessly would make me actually fucking learn this concept 😭😭😭 thank you

  • @AzureKyle
    @AzureKyle 3 місяці тому

    This is a neat way of doing it. Of course, you could always do it algebraically, by subtracting 24 from both sides, getting x^2+10x-24, which can be factored out to (x-2) and (x+12), giving us the answers of x=2 and x=-12.

  • @dikdndkshxnd7864
    @dikdndkshxnd7864 Місяць тому

    Thank you thank you sooooooooooooooo much you saved me from the exam

  • @johanndohmann1281
    @johanndohmann1281 7 місяців тому

    you are a genius!

  • @alejandromargulis2053
    @alejandromargulis2053 2 місяці тому

    Thank you, proffesor

  • @kmjohnny
    @kmjohnny 7 місяців тому +3

    Quadratic solution now kinda makes sense geometrically - it's just a question if I want to add or remove from x square

  • @liamathew3260
    @liamathew3260 13 днів тому

    i finally know why it is in fact called "complete the square"

  • @AyushTomar-wp3is
    @AyushTomar-wp3is 7 місяців тому +1

    The equation i.e
    ((1/√(x!-1)+1/x^2)!
    It surprisingly approaches to 0.999.
    For x>2
    lim
    x→∞
    I would really appreciate you if you check it and I would like to ask can this be constant which is mine?

  • @adamdevmedia
    @adamdevmedia 7 місяців тому +1

    I like to define perfect squares first and then you just use c=(b/2)^2 and see what's extra

  • @Areco777
    @Areco777 7 місяців тому +2

    can you please post the solution to sqrt(1/x^2 - 1/x^3) + sqrt(1/x - 1/x^3) = 1 without just squaring both side and making it very long.

    • @youngmathematician9154
      @youngmathematician9154 7 місяців тому +1

      Here is how I did it (it does use squaring both sides but it's not that long, don't worry :)) :
      First, let t=1/x. Our equation becomes sqrt(t^2-t^3)+sqrt(t-t^3)=1. We will now make a series of algebraic manipulations:
      Isolate sqrt(t^2-t^3): sqrt(t^2-t^3)=1-sqrt(t-t^3)
      Square both sides: t^2-t^3=1+t-t^3-2sqrt(t-t^3)
      Cancel the t^3 terms and isolate 2sqrt(t-t^3): t^2-t-1=-2sqrt(t-t^3)
      Square both sides again: t^4-2t^3-t^2+2t+1=4t-4t^3
      Move everything to the LHS: t^4+2t^3-t^2-2t+1=0
      Notice our LHS looks a lot like t^4-2t^3-t^2+2t+1, which we know is equal to (t^2-t-1)^2 since we worked it out earlier. This motivates us to introduce the substitution t=-y. Our equation then becomes y^4-2y^3-y^2+2y+1=0, which factors as (y^2-y-1)^2=0, which is equivalent to y^2-y-1=0.
      Solving this quadratic equation gives us y=(1+-sqrt(5))/2. Since t=-y=1/x (our substitutions from earlier), we have x=-1/y.
      Therefore, x=-1/((1+-sqrt(5))/2)=-2/(1+-sqrt(5)).
      Rationalizing the denominator gives x=-2/(1+-sqrt(5))*(1-+sqrt(5))/(1-+sqrt(5))=-2(1-+sqrt(5))/(-4)=(1+sqrt(5))/2.
      Hence, x=(1+sqrt(5))/2 or x=(1-sqrt(5))/2.
      However, we have to reject the second solution since it makes the second square root in the original equation a complex number.
      Therefore, the only solution x=(1+sqrt(5))/2, which just so happens to be the golden ratio!

  • @Momolaranya
    @Momolaranya 6 місяців тому

    im not confused any longer

  • @kavinesh_the_legend
    @kavinesh_the_legend 7 місяців тому +2

    And now I'm confused

  • @channelbuattv
    @channelbuattv 7 місяців тому +1

    why do we always assume that x is greater than the number?

    • @zemyaso
      @zemyaso 7 місяців тому

      Graphs are not gonna be 100% accurate. If x was < or > or = the number, then just draw the x accordingly.
      This is just to get the idea of where completing the square comes from.

    • @channelbuattv
      @channelbuattv 7 місяців тому

      @@zemyaso When people draw (a±b)² sometimes they assume either a>b or a

    • @bprpmathbasics
      @bprpmathbasics  7 місяців тому +2

      It doesn’t matter. I could have done a smaller square first then a bigger one. 😃

    • @channelbuattv
      @channelbuattv 7 місяців тому

      @@bprpmathbasics Divide by 2 or multiply by ½?

  • @APUS_NUNN
    @APUS_NUNN 7 місяців тому

    ... Und jetzt noch den Zusammenhang zwischen x=2 und der Abbildung... bzw x=-12 und der Abbildung 😮.....

  • @blissard96
    @blissard96 7 місяців тому

    ! warning do not trust this guy !