All engine technologies have made substantial benefits to the environment whatever the manufacturer is. This is no surprise as the engines from all manufacturers have been doing just that since they appeared in the 50's.
The GE9X is designed to be more fuel-efficient than its predecessor, the GE90-115B, with a 10% reduction in fuel consumption. It also has lower CO2, NOx, and noise emissions. This is the second upgrade from its original design.
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Ulala ! AIRBUS just revealed A350 huge upgrade for the future. If it is Garuda Indonesia would likely to be deal it with AIRBUS over BOEING makes me even more better than ever I heard.
You're not true @AbdullahNajib-b9z ! I'm an AIRBUS fan. Garuda currently have AIRBUS A330neo until now so, I am not accept your comments anymore because your comments make a combat of Muslim population other wise. So, do not comments me anymore !
This video commentator needs to have a chat with Tim Clark of Emirates that rejected the A350-1000 in favor of Boeings 777-9 and -8 because of substandard on-wing time for the RR. The next Airbus widebody will have GE engines.
@@FLIGAVIA You are welcome. I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in a previous video above, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
What do you mean by " airlines are upgrading " Upgrading what? Since the very beginning till day, A350-900 is fitted with Trent XWB-84 producing 84200 Lbs of thrust and A350-1000 with Trent XWB-97 producing 97000 lbs of thrust
Triple spool engines are too expensive to manufacture and also too expensive to maintain. Twin spool engines are less expensive to build and maintain. RR are dropping the triple spool architecture in favor of a geared fan.
It makes ZERO sense for Boeing to develop a new model to compete with the A350, it has that already (777x). It DOES make sense to update the engine options in the 787 however...
Oh Dear, lots of the commentary from company press releases and very odd emphasis on Airbus advances when it's actually Rolls Royce developments. "Boeing can react" etc is a nonsense. GE is doing everything it can to compete with Rolls Royce but these things are beyond difficult. Airbus is lucky that RR has got on top of things with the A350-900 engines but the A350-1000 engines are still too unreliable for some extreme environmental conditions including flying in and out of the Emirates. Time on wing is poor. In any case Airbus can make as many as it can with the order books extending for years but is finding it difficult to expand production beyond 5 per month. Boeing meanwhile just cannot get it planes out at all with the 777X still not certified after 7 year's flying so Airbus actually has an open field.
You fail to note that the Trent XWB Engines appear to be a product of close collaboration between Airbus and Rolls Royce and are for now exclusive to the Airbus A350. Rolls Royce will, for the time being, have its work cut out with delivering XWBs for both new Airbus and for upgrade replacements on older Airbus aircraft. Either Boeing has to alternately source engines with similar innovations or wait if/until Rolls Royce becomes free to supply them, both by being released from its exclusivity agreement with Airbus and having the capacity to supply. This, and even if Boeing were able to quickly spool up production, and the abundance of problems Boeing currently faces does not bode well.
@@scotthavarth9423 Are RR paying him to crow about their substandard engines-? I challenged him to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
@@John-nc4blyou can't compare it like that? The A350-900 has a higher range than the 787-9 and also a higher passenger capacity. The aircraft is simply bigger. So yes it burns a bit more fuel.
Years of failure and Boeing still can't get two of it's four Max's or 777X in the air. Meanwhile, Airbus has a wide range of reliable and fuel efficient aircraft and continues to upgrade its fleet. It will take Boeing decades, if ever, to catch up. Greed and corruption have ruined what once was the dominant manufacturer of civilian aircraft.
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Are RR paying you, the narrator of this video to 'crow' about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Not worth my time to watch. Thankfully, I double speeded it. This wasn’t an airbus innovation, this is a Rolls-Royce innovation. And a one percent is a nice to have and they had to increase the service interval because there were a lot of issues with these engines requiring more frequent service services, which actually is very costly for the Airlines. Definitely click bait…
In the Middle East, the original engines were not up to standard for the harsh desert environment, leading to Qatar and all that to ground them, this is also the reason Emirates ordered the -900, and not the A35K. Airbus does not make their own engines.
@@Icon1468 can you please provide any proof of what you are saying?! I would like to see a source of information which shows that there are currently many A359 and A351 grounded at Qatar airlines
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-? I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines. The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend. The GEnx is a superior engine. As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Thanks!
Built by a company that doesn't hate its unionised workforce.
Yet. The problems will come.they will
@@gwhyte01And why do you say that?
All engine technologies have made substantial benefits to the environment whatever the manufacturer is. This is no surprise as the engines from all manufacturers have been doing just that since they appeared in the 50's.
We love Air Bus & Boeing Planes, since jet aeroplanes came into being since 1970s vast improvements in materials,air engines & designs
I prefer always the engine that doesn't fail... 😁
GE.
@@John-nc4blDon't tell the 777x development team!
is no battle. Passengers decided. Airbus means safety.
Boeing couldn't build a reliable trash can at this point.
The reason is that Airbus have designed better planes and have paid heed to industry demands.
That they have designed better planes is arguable for me 😅🤷🏽♂️
Good planes yes but better planes…
It is ridiculous to ask people to like your video at the beginning.
So dont like it
The GE9X is designed to be more fuel-efficient than its predecessor, the GE90-115B, with a 10% reduction in fuel consumption. It also has lower CO2, NOx, and noise emissions. This is the second upgrade from its original design.
That's right!
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
you say the efficiency improvement is 1% but in the text above you stated 15%? Are you messing these things up? 1% vs 15% ?????
The Airbus A350 is a magnificent plane and I knew it would be a success from my first flight in this aircraft 5 years ago
yeah it is
5 years ago? My dog has successfully given birth to more than 100 puppies.
@@starnight1209 I am very happy for you and your dog .... haha
a350 is taking full advantage of the Boeing downfall. On top of making quality and safety a priority, they're just gonna keep going up from here.
Totally agree
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
I'm pretty sure this is not the first time Boeing his face problems they'll prevail they always do
Ulala ! AIRBUS just revealed A350 huge upgrade for the future. If it is Garuda Indonesia would likely to be deal it with AIRBUS over BOEING makes me even more better than ever I heard.
remember garuda cancelled a330neo?
garuda wants to buy boeing.they can not have another reputation damaging crash
You're not true @AbdullahNajib-b9z ! I'm an AIRBUS fan. Garuda currently have AIRBUS A330neo until now so, I am not accept your comments anymore because your comments make a combat of Muslim population other wise. So, do not comments me anymore !
@@nabilisur9566if boeing was anti Islam,I would not be a boeing fan.
@@nabilisur9566they cancelled 330neo
Are not these engine upgrades because of the complaints from Emirates ?
Which is holding back a big buy of the Airbus A350 1000 from the Emirates ?
Emirates prefer the big triple 7.
Tim Clark has been critical of the engines on the A350-1000. So it seems unlikely that the A350-1000 will be Emirates' replacement for the 777X.
@@FLIGAVIA True but I am wondering if these RR engine upgrades are meant to make Tim Clark change his mind ?
Yes they are
@@CraigDakin-b5n Boeing is the dominant supplier of airfrmes to Emirates.
GE is the dominant supplier of engines to Emirates.
This video commentator needs to have a chat with Tim Clark of Emirates that rejected the A350-1000 in favor of Boeings 777-9 and -8 because of substandard on-wing time for the RR.
The next Airbus widebody will have GE engines.
Thanks for your feedback!
RR XWB 97
@@FLIGAVIA You are welcome.
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in a previous video above, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
emirates a350-900 will have which engines?
What do you mean by
" airlines are upgrading "
Upgrading what?
Since the very beginning till day, A350-900 is fitted with Trent XWB-84 producing 84200 Lbs of thrust and A350-1000 with Trent XWB-97 producing 97000 lbs of thrust
But don’t they have the A350-1000 now?
Triple spool engines are too expensive to manufacture and also too expensive to maintain. Twin spool engines are less expensive to build and maintain.
RR are dropping the triple spool architecture in favor of a geared fan.
@chespocket1756 yes
A350-1000 is fitted with Trent XWB 92
@@John-nc4bl
But Trent XWB isn't Geared Turbo Fan
It makes ZERO sense for Boeing to develop a new model to compete with the A350, it has that already (777x). It DOES make sense to update the engine options in the 787 however...
boeing likes to speak about economy perfornance, but never about safety.
That is SHOCKING
A 350 XWB - 97
3:01 unmatched in power
GE-90-115b: Am I a joke to you?
GE90 has an amazing sound on start up.
Airbus is like LOCKHEED and Boeing is like CONVAIR....
nahh
Bye Bye Boeing!!
I hope you are not American.Boeing is one of the top employers and exporter of USA
Except the largest buyer (Emirates) has no interest in rolls. It would be better if they ditched them and picked up GE.
Oh dear, you should learn to listen - indeed the hurdle with Emirates was the time on wing issue which RR has now rectified and doubled 🤦🏻♂️😉
@@remi_gio Wrong.
RR have not rectified and doubled.
@ 😂 you really should research more - you are embarrassing yourself 🤭
Love the Boeing boys whining……………
Oh Dear, lots of the commentary from company press releases and very odd emphasis on Airbus advances when it's actually Rolls Royce developments. "Boeing can react" etc is a nonsense. GE is doing everything it can to compete with Rolls Royce but these things are beyond difficult. Airbus is lucky that RR has got on top of things with the A350-900 engines but the A350-1000 engines are still too unreliable for some extreme environmental conditions including flying in and out of the Emirates. Time on wing is poor. In any case Airbus can make as many as it can with the order books extending for years but is finding it difficult to expand production beyond 5 per month. Boeing meanwhile just cannot get it planes out at all with the 777X still not certified after 7 year's flying so Airbus actually has an open field.
You fail to note that the Trent XWB Engines appear to be a product of close collaboration between Airbus and Rolls Royce and are for now exclusive to the Airbus A350. Rolls Royce will, for the time being, have its work cut out with delivering XWBs for both new Airbus and for upgrade replacements on older Airbus aircraft. Either Boeing has to alternately source engines with similar innovations or wait if/until Rolls Royce becomes free to supply them, both by being released from its exclusivity agreement with Airbus and having the capacity to supply. This, and even if Boeing were able to quickly spool up production, and the abundance of problems Boeing currently faces does not bode well.
@@benedictdesilva6677
RR is locked into Airbus for years
Boeing has to develop GE as its source or die.
XWB134 super sized engine has limited time on wings
Emirates has to suck it up or give up A350-1000
@@scotthavarth9423 Are RR paying him to crow about their substandard engines-?
I challenged him to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
All aircrafts are old technology if they still emitting Carbon
Shut up! The A350 consumes more fuel than the 787!
The A350 is more fuel efficient
@@Grailtabuzo19 The 787-9 burns approximately 1.5% to 2% less fuel than the A350-900 with the same payload weight.
@@John-nc4blyou can't compare it like that? The A350-900 has a higher range than the 787-9 and also a higher passenger capacity. The aircraft is simply bigger. So yes it burns a bit more fuel.
@@AME320-27 some people have no idea what they even on about, like the one you replied to
@@John-nc4bl you obviously have Zero idea what you are talking about go and have another puff
Years of failure and Boeing still can't get two of it's four Max's or 777X in the air. Meanwhile, Airbus has a wide range of reliable and fuel efficient aircraft and continues to upgrade its fleet. It will take Boeing decades, if ever, to catch up. Greed and corruption have ruined what once was the dominant manufacturer of civilian aircraft.
Exactly.
I expected A350-1000 has MTOW not less then B777-300 Er but not even Even; thats a minus for Airbus to replace 777 s
Engine 97
Boeing it’s done, they have spend 30 year hiring more Vice’s people and lest engineers. Sorry but they arrived where they wanted.
I still believe they will fix it.
What are you yapping about
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Boeing!
Are RR paying you, the narrator of this video to 'crow' about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Gosh you're sure smart. Hee-yuh
Accept the challenge. We actually did a video about the Trent 1000 engine issue on the 787 before.
Not worth my time to watch. Thankfully, I double speeded it. This wasn’t an airbus innovation, this is a Rolls-Royce innovation. And a one percent is a nice to have and they had to increase the service interval because there were a lot of issues with these engines requiring more frequent service services, which actually is very costly for the Airlines. Definitely click bait…
`1 and 2
Awesome!
@@FLIGAVIA The 787-9 burns approximately 1.5% to 2% less fuel than the A350-900 with the same payload weight.
2!!!!
Awesome!
United does not operate this aircraft. You don’t know what you’re talking about…….
Correct, esp the 2nd sentence
xwb 84 not reliable
Boeing's downward trajectory started when its CEO was brought in from a washing machine and dishwasher company ( GE )
!! LOL
1,2
old news.
The three spooled engine is too expensive to manufacture and maintain when compared to twin spooled engines.
If its so good, why are so many A350’s grounded due to engines
ask airbus fans.its because of unicorns and griffins 😂😂
put simply,they have nothing to say
Where are many of these planes grounded?
In the Middle East, the original engines were not up to standard for the harsh desert environment, leading to Qatar and all that to ground them, this is also the reason Emirates ordered the -900, and not the A35K. Airbus does not make their own engines.
@@Icon1468 can you please provide any proof of what you are saying?! I would like to see a source of information which shows that there are currently many A359 and A351 grounded at Qatar airlines
@@Kveiteson 787s grounded because of lack of spare RRs.
Lazy B was overetaken by hard working Airbus 20 years ago.... now useless B has no chances never anymore
The fact that you don't know that United doesn't have any A350s makes me question the rest of your facts
thanks for sharing man
I thought the A350 was being dropped due to high costs in general...
Thanks for your comment.
@@FLIGAVIA Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.
Advertisment.
i'm not paid 🤦♂
Please stop with the eco shit!
Boeing engines still more efficient and their plane is more lighter. Airbus is only catching up with Boeing.
Hmm maybe but they don’t have any new modern planes. They all been recalled or not certified due to poor quality control
In which universe?
Boeing don't build engines, however they do use RR engines on some of their models?
Boeing engines? I'm confused
@@grahampritchard5284 RR only on the 787 which was a failure.
Ask British Air as they have gone to GE for future 787s.
Airbus interior material is shit; aging rapidly and Airbus real technology is not engines its wing design
Bogus video.
Boeing is better
Evidence? None that I can see.
It sometimes lands with the same number of parts than it took off with.
@@mikecooper5544
You meant less parts then it took off with :))
Boeing has trashed it's reputation with shoddy work and covering up problems. It's a long uphill struggle to regain customer confidence
At crashing yes!
Are RR paying you to crow about their engines-?
I challenge you to produce a video about the Trent 1000 failure including the number of airlines that have shunned it for their future 787s and have ordered GEnx engines.
The following airlines have switched to the GEnx such as British Airways, LATAM; Air NZ; Al Nippon, Thai Airways, Ethiopian, Air Tanzania and more than likely other carriers will follow this trend.
The GEnx is a superior engine.
As I noted in one of my comments, RR triple spool engines are more expensive to manufacture and also more expensive to maintain than twin spool engines such as GE and Pratt.