The Battleship Bismarck: Challenging British Naval Supremacy with a Super-Armoured Ship

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 вер 2024
  • Get your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.... It's an exclusive offer for our viewers! Start your free trial today. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 3,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv...
    Check out Simon's latest project, Into the Shadows: / intotheshadows
    Simon's Social Media:
    Twitter: / simonwhistler
    Instagram: / simonwhistler
    This video is #sponsored by Magellan TV.
    Love content? Check out Simon's other UA-cam Channels:
    SideProjects: / @sideprojects
    Biographics: / @biographics
    Geographics: / @geographicstravel
    Casual Criminalist: / @thecasualcriminalist
    Today I Found Out: / todayifoundout
    TopTenz: / toptenznet
    Highlight History: / @highlighthistory
    XPLRD: / @xplrd
    Business Blaze: / @brainblaze6526

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,1 тис.

  • @megaprojects9649
    @megaprojects9649  2 роки тому +19

    Get your SPECIAL OFFER for MagellanTV here: try.magellantv.com/MEGAPROJECTS. It's an exclusive offer for our viewers! Start your free trial today. MagellanTV is a new kind of streaming service run by filmmakers with 3,000+ documentaries! Check out our personal recommendation and MagellanTV’s exclusive playlists: www.magellantv.com/explore/history

  • @trevorday7923
    @trevorday7923 2 роки тому +74

    Another bit of trivia: in the 1960 movie 'Sink The Bismark' the captain of HMS Prince of Wales was played by Esmund Knight, who actually was aboard the Prince of Wales when she engaged the Bismark and was wounded

    • @Coxman
      @Coxman Рік тому +5

      Thanks for sharing.

    • @周越智
      @周越智 5 місяців тому

      You are right!

  • @carsonm7292
    @carsonm7292 2 роки тому +238

    Speaking of the Bismarck, the multiple operations to sink the Tirpitz in the fjords of Norway were certainly a mega project themselves.

    • @ZenkoTheGreat
      @ZenkoTheGreat 2 роки тому +22

      YES! Churchill's obsession with sinking Tirpitz was legendary.

    • @tinafoster8665
      @tinafoster8665 2 роки тому +3

      Yes like weird submarine things that carried these big mines, the mines go off n wreck all the light bulbs n most of the machinery but the ship still floated

    • @MarkkkyPants
      @MarkkkyPants 2 роки тому

      Jeremy clarkson did a fantastic documentary about the raid on saint Nazaire planned to disable the turpitz

    • @WasabiSniffer
      @WasabiSniffer 2 роки тому +4

      Operation Chariot is a hell of a story as well

    • @arthas640
      @arthas640 2 роки тому +1

      @@WasabiSniffer Yarnhub did an awesome video on it:
      ua-cam.com/video/NB5mAG1WvvU/v-deo.html

  • @jordaneggerman4734
    @jordaneggerman4734 2 роки тому +44

    My favorite part of this story is the Polish. Their one destroyer they were able to scramble for the task, while shelling the Bismarck, was flashing "I am a Pole" at the German ship.

    • @bobolobocus333
      @bobolobocus333 Рік тому +6

      OPP Piorun! I want to say that it fired all guns blazing - literally, if it was in range, it would be fired. Depth charges? Fired. Small arms? Fired. Primary and secondary guns? Fired.

    • @jordaneggerman4734
      @jordaneggerman4734 Рік тому +9

      @@bobolobocus333 not many who lived in the fight to sink the Bismarck can say they truly gave it their all, and I only recently actually found out the name of the ship, but, by God, Piorun gave all they had, and then some! Even stayed on station, continuing to fire until they were dangerously low on fuel!
      Not many nations, as a whole, suffered like the Polish did in WWII, but OPP Piorun definitely made sure to give back to her oppressors!

  • @Happymali10
    @Happymali10 2 роки тому +108

    14:10
    Imagining the fleet gives you a broad idea of just how pissed off Churchill was.

    • @justandy333
      @justandy333 2 роки тому +12

      As a previous and present First lord of the admiralty you can tell he really knew just how much of a threat this battleship posed, not just to the military and merchant fleet, but to the moral of the country as a whole. The Bismarck had to be sunk! Even if it mean't diverting the majoity of assets in the atlantic to do so. We needed this win (or at least pulling even). To have let the Bismarck slip away would have been catastrophic

    • @chrisaustin9949
      @chrisaustin9949 2 роки тому +3

      What he is saying about the Bismark is overstated. It was about the same size and capability of other battleships being built at the time. The problem was not the lack of allied ships of it's size, the problem is that most of them were in the Pacific fighting the Japanese. As for the battle itself, the Bismark with it's 15" guns was outgunned by the HMS Rodney and it's 16" guns which sank her.

    • @andersjjensen
      @andersjjensen 2 роки тому +6

      @@chrisaustin9949 Except it sank because the Germans scuttled it. The Royal Navy had still not managed to make a single hole below the water line. The torpedo that fucked the rudder was a direct hit on the bow. That would have put most ships of the time under water in short order.

    • @McTeerZor
      @McTeerZor 2 роки тому +3

      @@chrisaustin9949 Experts think otherwise. If Bismarck was in good fighting shape (Which she wasn't) she would have been able to out maneuver Rodney. And with Bismarcks better fire control and gunnery....Would have made it an even, if not slightly in the bismarks favour.

    • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
      @AWMJoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому +2

      @@McTeerZor Still the fact that Bismarck would by your words only slightly have the edge over Rodney isn't saying much. Rodney entered service 11 years before Bismarck was even launched. If you compare Bismarck to her actual contemporaries like this KGVs and the North Carolina's she comes off pretty badly. Inefficient, underarmoured and undergunned for her size.

  • @bhavens9149
    @bhavens9149 2 роки тому +294

    "Sink the bismark was the battle cry that shook the seven seas." Johnny Horton :)

    • @jasonholland7770
      @jasonholland7770 2 роки тому +35

      "With guns as big as steers and shells as big as trees", i thank my country music loving dad for that one. lol .

    • @bhavens9149
      @bhavens9149 2 роки тому +21

      @@jasonholland7770 The brittish guns were aimed and the shells were coming fast! the first shell hit the Bismark, they knew she couldn't last, that mighty German battleship is just a memory ... :) yup ballads! a lost art I think.

    • @DougieFresh765
      @DougieFresh765 2 роки тому +10

      That song was a Banger. I'm glad my grandpa had the Johnny Horton greatest hits on cassette in the 90s

    • @bhavens9149
      @bhavens9149 2 роки тому +5

      @@DougieFresh765 I had to buy the CD when I found it in a clearance bin a few years back because hey! it really is a banger! also I think its on youtube?

    • @randoir1863
      @randoir1863 2 роки тому +3

      Well it's nice to know that the Brits only crippled the ship and didn't actually sink it . If anything the Germans can build really solid products.

  • @receiving9067
    @receiving9067 2 роки тому +210

    My favorite Bismarck story is that little Polish destroyer signaling away "I am a Pole" as the Bismarck was being pounded

    • @The_Daily_Tomato
      @The_Daily_Tomato 2 роки тому +26

      It's my favorite too. Such a fuck you to them. I love it 😄

    • @ToaArcan
      @ToaArcan 2 роки тому +11

      Kings, all of them.

    • @admiraltiberius1989
      @admiraltiberius1989 2 роки тому +27

      Getting close enough that its 20mm and 40mm AA guns could open fire and Bismarcks main battery couldn't depress low enough to engage.
      Would like to add, the Polish destroyer actually hounded the Bismarck at night before the final battle.

    • @Chris_at_Home
      @Chris_at_Home 2 роки тому +6

      The pilot of the RAF PBY Catalina that spotted the Bismarck was an American Mercenary.

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 2 роки тому +5

      @@Chris_at_Home No. I am sure he would have done it just to cover his expenses. American volunteer would be more apt.

  • @hankw69
    @hankw69 2 роки тому +79

    I love the fact that a Polish warship was involved. Get your licks in where you can...

    • @SabreSix1980
      @SabreSix1980 2 роки тому +20

      It's actions were also legendary. In the night before KGV and Rodney showed up, the destroyer flotilla that included Piorun was ordered to harass Bismarck trough the night in order to keep its crew up so they would be fatigued in the battle on the next morning. Piorun closed to point blank range in order to fire every weapon it had, including the light aa, whilst signaling "I am a Pole".

    • @hankw69
      @hankw69 2 роки тому +1

      @@SabreSix1980 Please tell me what book or video you got that from.

    • @SabreSix1980
      @SabreSix1980 2 роки тому +7

      @@hankw69 Drachinifels long video on Operation Rheinübung ua-cam.com/video/n69kV4gVoDw/v-deo.html
      It's mentioned starting around the 1hr 10min mark

    • @hankw69
      @hankw69 2 роки тому +1

      @@SabreSix1980 thanks will check it out

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 роки тому

      @@SabreSix1980 All true except for the "fired everything she had"... Piorun was the only destroyer of the 4th Destroyer flotilla to not fire her primary weapon at Bismarck.... her torpedoes.

  • @ignitionfrn2223
    @ignitionfrn2223 2 роки тому +30

    1:30 - Chapter 1 - Development
    3:55 - Chapter 2 - Launch
    5:20 - Chapter 3 - The bismarck
    8:15 - Mid roll ads
    9:25 - Chapter 4 - Operations begin
    12:00 - Chapter 5 - Battle of the denmark strait
    13:55 - Chapter 6 - The hunt
    15:25 - Chapter 7 - The sinking of the bismarck
    17:45 - Chapter 8 - The wreck

  • @philiphumphrey1548
    @philiphumphrey1548 2 роки тому +120

    It's well worth watching Drachinifel's UA-cam video on what happened to HMS Hood. It was almost certainly not a plunging shell that did the damage, and the deck armour was not to blame. The range was too short, the shell came in at a shallow angle and most likely somehow penetrated or bypassed the thick side armour, perhaps striking under the waterline. However it happened, it was a lucky shot that would most likely have destroyed any battleship of the time. Another lucky shot, the torpedo that disabled the Bismarck's rudders ensured the final end of that ship.

    • @thunderboltlightning6010
      @thunderboltlightning6010 2 роки тому +2

      Yeah, considering the range and angle, neither the deck nor the belt were likely to be penetrated at all. Must be one lucky shell that somehow hit somewhere unprotected.

    • @bluemarlin8138
      @bluemarlin8138 2 роки тому +12

      Well, it would have destroyed any ship which didn’t have an armor belt extending well below the waterline and had its magazines positioned in the same place. If it hit one of the US SoDak and Iowa classes, the British King George V class, or the Yamato class, it wouldn’t have penetrated the armor belt at that range and angle. Those ships also had their magazines lower in the ship than Hood did. Hood was just designed at a time when underwater protection wasn’t as great of a priority.

    • @toothedacorn4724
      @toothedacorn4724 2 роки тому

      @@bluemarlin8138 you know, they did actually have torpedoes and mines in ww1, it just so happens stopping a torpedo and a shell are not the same thing

    • @jeffrygriffith3811
      @jeffrygriffith3811 Рік тому

      "Lucky" = Right Place at the Right Time along with Engagement. Like all the gloves that ever found Micheal Tyson's head.

    • @chrislong6541
      @chrislong6541 8 місяців тому

      What was the range from my understanding plunging fire especially from lower velocity guns can begin happening at about 11-12 km

  • @antonyborlase3965
    @antonyborlase3965 2 роки тому +72

    Bismarck was made to 'old' designs. The seperate secondaries and tertiaries was a throw back to WW1, and greatly reduced the effectiveness of the armour as it had to cover more ammo storages and trunking.

    • @CaveJohnsonAperture
      @CaveJohnsonAperture 2 роки тому +18

      Yeah "Super armored ship" is just misinformed clickbait

    • @peterbrazier7107
      @peterbrazier7107 2 роки тому +10

      She was based on the Mackensen, the allies tested the surviving German battleships to destruction, the KGV class were probably better, Hood was in dire need of modernization but war stopped that.

    • @SabreSix1980
      @SabreSix1980 2 роки тому +14

      @@CaveJohnsonAperture She wasn't even that super armored, KGV had better armor

    • @scdallav
      @scdallav 2 роки тому +3

      The US and the UK were the only ones who had a strict break between surface action only primary and dual-purpose secondary batteries. Everyone else had surface action only secondaries and dual-purpose tertiary batteries.

    • @ScienceChap
      @ScienceChap 2 роки тому +8

      Also a lot of wasted weight. The 15 inch guns in 4 twin turrets was outclassed by 3 triple 16 inch turrets with all or nothing armour scheme. Rodney was rather slow, bur was highly effective and very heavily armed. The Royal Navy’s KGV was also the most heavily armoured battleship ever built until the Yamato was completed .

  • @samporter9729
    @samporter9729 2 роки тому +42

    Given the mention of Tirpitz, could we get a video on 617 Squadron? Not just the standard bit on the Dam Busters raid, but a look at the groundbreaking work they did with high-altitude precision bombing throughout the war?

    • @MortRotu
      @MortRotu 2 роки тому +2

      That'd be an hour long epic as it'd need to mention the development of the sights and munitions that made it possible as well as the pilots and planes of 617. Definitely a worthwhile idea though

  • @combatwombat2134
    @combatwombat2134 Рік тому +4

    I don't believe the title is accurate. The Bismarck was NOT designed to go toe to toe with the Royal Navy beyond harassing merchant shipping and their escorts.
    She WAS designed to battle the French Navy, specifically the likes of the Richelieu.
    Even the Kriegsmarine knew she wasn't supposed to slug it out with the RN - they actually were really fearful of going into a brawl with them.
    Hence why, in their first mission, they didn't chase down the PoW. Even without the damage she was never going to pursue, she wanted to be out in the Atlantic hunting supply ships.

  • @simonwyndham
    @simonwyndham 2 роки тому +76

    The Hood is worthy of a video in herself! As is the Prince of Wales.

    • @streetracer2321
      @streetracer2321 2 роки тому +10

      Check out Drachinifel’s channel, he’s a naval expert and talks about those ships at length

    • @MortRotu
      @MortRotu 2 роки тому +3

      Was just about to recommend Drachinifel for that as well.

    • @FreshwaterNautical
      @FreshwaterNautical 2 роки тому +1

      I could name a few. King George V class, HMS Hood, Iowa-class, Vittorio Veneto-class are just a few battleships that are worthy of videos. Panzershiff’s Graf Spee and Deutschland are good video ideas

    • @streetracer2321
      @streetracer2321 2 роки тому +1

      @@FreshwaterNautical yeah but it makes way more sense to just watch a naval history channel than to ask a guy who has no idea about naval stuff to read off what he finds on Wiki

    • @JinKee
      @JinKee 2 роки тому

      The death of the Prince of Wales and the Repulse off the coast of Singapore is one of the most interesting ones for me, because they were supposed to have a carrier, the Illustrious with them, but she had run aground in Jamaca and nobody ever got charged.

  • @stephenconroy5908
    @stephenconroy5908 2 роки тому +50

    Drachinifel's video on HMS Hood "But why did it blow up?" is a masterclass in naval history, and to which you realise just how astronomical the shot that sunk her was. Forensically detailed whilst thoroughly engaging.
    Dr Alexander Clarke's video "A bit more on RN destroyers - The Hunt for the Bismarck" explains the role of those ships in the kill. It's brilliant, as epic as the Swordfish and battleship action, and the conduct/mentality of Tribal destroyers and ORP Piorun hammers home a singular point: the RN was not going to let Bismarck return home alive.

    • @Wayoutthere
      @Wayoutthere 2 роки тому +5

      His video is MANDATORY for understanding the most probable cause.

    • @Aubury
      @Aubury 2 роки тому +2

      Yes, lts a worthy theory. Highly recommended.

    • @navnig
      @navnig 2 роки тому +4

      Absolutely correct! From the moment HMS Hood was sunk, Bismarck had signed her own death warrant. She was getting sunk, no matter the cost after that.

  • @wildkarrde3370
    @wildkarrde3370 2 роки тому +32

    I have to say, I love all of Factboy's videos from all of his many, many channels, but Drachinifel has me spoiled for this particular topic.

  • @ToxikDouche
    @ToxikDouche 2 роки тому +2

    Since I haven't seen anything yet. *clears throat* PRIDE OF A NATION! A BEAST MADE OF STEEL! BISMARK IN MOTION! KING OF THE OCEAN!

  • @canadianbacon9819
    @canadianbacon9819 2 роки тому +117

    This is epic it would be nice to see one on the HMS vanguard. The largest British battleship

    • @Metallica4Life92
      @Metallica4Life92 2 роки тому +4

      yesss this right here is a brilliant idea!

    • @megaprojects9649
      @megaprojects9649  2 роки тому +25

      Good suggestion.

    • @canadianbacon9819
      @canadianbacon9819 2 роки тому +2

      Thanks gents!

    • @jackyoung6093
      @jackyoung6093 2 роки тому +7

      Maybe something about the hypothetical Tillmans/A-150s/lion class/H class insanity? I'd love to see someone delve into the fevered pipe dreams of yesteryears naval architects.

    • @loganmarriott514
      @loganmarriott514 2 роки тому +10

      Warspite has a more interesting story, and a way cooler name

  • @wolfenwingsable
    @wolfenwingsable 2 роки тому +118

    Saboton has an amazing song about the Bismark!

    • @celltanic
      @celltanic 2 роки тому +14

      Dont forget the amazing music video

    • @andygarwood673
      @andygarwood673 2 роки тому +10

      If the Simon does not know the Sabaton he should ua-cam.com/video/oVWEb-At8yc/v-deo.html

    • @MisterOcclusion
      @MisterOcclusion 2 роки тому +18

      I came here looking for a Sabaton Intensifies comment.

    • @matthewgooch7198
      @matthewgooch7198 2 роки тому +13

      So did you find the boat? 🤘🤘

    • @mulgerbill
      @mulgerbill 2 роки тому +6

      Sabaton has amazing songs of many battles.
      I saw them live in Melbourne on a joint ticket with Nightwish. Raw Power and amazing stage presence.

  • @Kellen6795
    @Kellen6795 2 роки тому +86

    Missed some interesting facts about it. Her own guns knocked out her main radar, a polish dd that went nuts, and the Rodney being the only BB to torp another BB

    • @virt1one
      @virt1one 2 роки тому +13

      also that they stopped for like an hour to try to fix the jammed rudder (that a torpedo, dropped by a BIPLANE, had fired, that the advanced AA directors couldn't target because of how SLOW they flew), and couldn't get into the steering compartment to uncouple the rudders (she had 2, but only 1 was jammed) because of the rough seas.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 роки тому +4

      @@virt1one "she had 2 rudders, but only 1 was jammed" maybe true, but the steering compartment above the rudders was flooded, as a consequence Bismarck's crew couldn't disengage the jammed rudder, otherwise her other rudder could be set to the oppossing angle to counteract the jammed rudder.

    • @bluemarlin8138
      @bluemarlin8138 2 роки тому +12

      @@virt1one That’s a misconception about the German AA guns not being able to track the Swordfish torpedo bombers. The reason none were shot down is largely that the Swordish’s canvas skin wouldn’t initiate the fuzes on the German AA shells, whereas the metal skin on other aircraft would have. Some of those Swordfish came back shot full of holes, but since the shells didn’t hit any structural members, the engine, or the pilot, they just passed on through and the plane kept flying.

    • @freddieellis8449
      @freddieellis8449 2 роки тому +3

      And Hood fired a torpedo at Bismarck just as she slipped beneath the waves causing a sharp change of course which ruined the firing solution on Prince of Wales. This last act quite possibly save PoW from the same fate as Hood.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 роки тому +1

      @@freddieellis8449 A second "million to one" shot on PoW? Unlikely.

  • @ScienceChap
    @ScienceChap 2 роки тому +7

    The 15inch guns were pretty good. The 5.9 inch secondary were surface action only. The tertiary 105mm were overly complicated. The 37mm was absolutely pants. The RN was already using dual purpose secondary battery and large numbers of 2lb pompoms or 40mm bofors guns. This made for spare weight which was better used for armour and engines.
    Edit. Hood's armour was actually very thick. She had 12 inch belt armour and a 5 inch deck. She suffered from a number of piecemeal refits, with a lightly protected 4 inch magazine installed right in front of the main after 15 inch magazine. It's likely that the combination of piecemeal refits combined with subpar protection around her 4 inch magazine was what killed Hood.

    • @jamesharding3459
      @jamesharding3459 2 роки тому +5

      There's a chap with a channel called Drachinifel, and that more or less mirrors his conclusion - which I happen to agree is the most plausible explanation.

    • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
      @AWMJoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому +3

      Thankyou! I'm so sick of people saying hood was a lightly armoured glass cannon.

    • @ScienceChap
      @ScienceChap 2 роки тому +1

      @@jamesharding3459 Drachinifel is excellent. Good call.

  • @johnmorris7815
    @johnmorris7815 2 роки тому +5

    In 1987 I was working for ‘Sukling Airways’ based in Ipswich Suffolk, one of my Captains was a chap called Nick Von-Berg, he lent me a hard back copy of “Sink the Bismarck”, inside was an inscription from a chap he used to fly with in Gulf Air by the name of Bismarck Briggs, so called because he was the Catolina pilot who spotted the Bismarck after it had escaped from the Hood engagement.

  • @zachariaszut
    @zachariaszut 2 роки тому +22

    Interesting.
    As a side note, and not that it matters much to me, Prinz Eugen reads Prince 'Hoigen' and not 'eoojen'.
    Other than that, never mind the torpedoes, full speed ahead.

    • @brazenbunnies
      @brazenbunnies 2 роки тому +3

      I really thought that as a Brit, or former Brit, he would have got that one

    • @lewisallan9963
      @lewisallan9963 2 роки тому

      @@brazenbunnies just because he doesn't live here doesn't mean he isnt British anymore 😂

    • @Palimbacchius
      @Palimbacchius 2 роки тому

      And as for Cardinal Rish-a-low: it's embarrassing.

  • @Zeithri
    @Zeithri 2 роки тому +13

    " _Send word to Churchill. We have engaged, the Bismarck._ "
    - Dramatic Music -

  • @13lbaseball
    @13lbaseball 2 роки тому +181

    For anyone interested, Drachinifel does a fantastic video on the loss of HMS Hood and does a great job on world naval history in general. Here's the link to the Loss of the Hood video: ua-cam.com/video/CLPeC7LRqIY/v-deo.html

    • @antonyborlase3965
      @antonyborlase3965 2 роки тому +5

      Yes, it is good. Like he covers the fact on if it was 'unsinkable' or was/would have going down.

    • @chrismaverick9828
      @chrismaverick9828 2 роки тому +18

      Drach's coverage of the Bismarck is very very good. His explanation of the Hood's loss is likely the truth among all the others' theories.

    • @stephenpierce2726
      @stephenpierce2726 2 роки тому +8

      Was just about to link his vid after seeing super armored.... yeah.... that turtle back is soooo good.

    • @MortRotu
      @MortRotu 2 роки тому +1

      Another good channel on a few famous battleships is Animarchy. There's a nice video on Bismark by him and a few others, with more incoming.

    • @Simwebby
      @Simwebby 2 роки тому +7

      Agreed. Drach's videos are superb.

  • @mridho4070
    @mridho4070 2 роки тому +57

    From the mist a shape, a ship is taking form
    And the silence of the sea is about to drift into a storm
    Sign of power, show of force
    Raise the anchor battleship plotting its course
    Pride of a nation a beast made of steel
    Bismarck in motion king of the ocean
    He was made to rule the waves across the seven sea

    • @jacobanderson8219
      @jacobanderson8219 2 роки тому +5

      Good to see a fellow Sabaton fan.

    • @032adjutantreflex
      @032adjutantreflex 2 роки тому +4

      Sabaton taught me more about history than history class did

    • @chicjam8928
      @chicjam8928 2 роки тому +3

      FIRE POWER FIRE FIGHT

    • @jacobanderson8219
      @jacobanderson8219 2 роки тому +2

      @@chicjam8928 Battlestations, keep the targets steady in sight.

    • @Sh_rib
      @Sh_rib 2 роки тому +4

      I was wondering if they'd be any Sabaton references... i'm not disappointed 😎😎😎

  • @davyt0247
    @davyt0247 2 місяці тому

    Something awesome about that last torpedo run, Lieutenant Commander John “Jock” Moffat was piloting one of the Swordfish, as he was just about to launch he heard his navigator shout, “Not yet, Jock!” There was his friend, hanging over the side of the plane, shouting, “Not yet!” Then Jock realized why, he only had one torpedo, and if it hit the top of a wave, it could veer off course, but if the landed in a trough, the low point, there was a chance. Eventually he shouted, “Let her go!” Jock immediately fired and less than a minute later, that torpedo was the one that hit Bismark’s stern.

  • @ilfarmboy
    @ilfarmboy 2 роки тому +17

    the Bismarck' fire control was knocked out very early in its last battle causing accuracy to greatly drop off

    • @jamesharding3459
      @jamesharding3459 2 роки тому +9

      Germany fanboys: Bismarck OP lel
      Reality check: The rest of the world did away with exposed fire control cables in the pre-dreadnought era.

    • @jameswaterfield
      @jameswaterfield 2 роки тому

      This was achieved by HMS Norfolk, which repeated the feat on the Scharnhorst, 1 1/2 years later

    • @Dont14-r4k
      @Dont14-r4k Рік тому +1

      ​@@jamesharding3459 wasn't that taken out by a lucky shot to the superstructure though? Otherwise the Bismarck's better accuracy would of likely taken out the British fire control first.

  • @pjsparrow5904
    @pjsparrow5904 7 місяців тому

    The Sabaton song about the Bismarck is one of their best songs. And the video is so over the top and AWESOME

  • @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t
    @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t 2 роки тому +6

    It was reasonable to assume Bismarck would be in front; the ship had been in front (and observed to be in front) until the shockwave from a main battery salvo directed and Norfolk and Suffolk knocked out Bismarck's own rader set. The weather conditions in the Strait (plus it being night) meant that the lead ship really kind of needed working radar.

  • @jonathanpatrick8506
    @jonathanpatrick8506 2 роки тому +19

    Did you know HMS Rodney was the only battleship to use torpedoes on another battleship which happens to be the Bismarck

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 2 роки тому

      Belt and braces approach. I like it.

    • @FutureFlash2034
      @FutureFlash2034 2 роки тому +1

      Sadly as discovered later they did no damage at all to her as the anti torp belt did its job as intended.

    • @1993Crag
      @1993Crag 2 роки тому +4

      @@FutureFlash2034 No quite. They didn't find any outright breaches from torpedoes but that's pretty standard for any torpedoes against a Capital ship. You don't need to blow a hole in the side of a ship to crack plates and joins. As it stands, despite the torpedo bulge "doing its job" Bismarck was down to Port with a 20 degree list and several machinery spaces flooded after torpedo hits.

    • @FutureFlash2034
      @FutureFlash2034 2 роки тому +1

      @@1993Crag The partial list that began was because of the one major breach from 2 shell near the bow below the water line, however the water tight bulkheads held. However before the last 3-4 torps were launched the ship was stable and the crew decided to begin scuttling, The ship began to take on water and started to sink but the british presumed it was going to stay floating (whilst she was intentionally being sunk) so they fired 3-4 torps into its broadside trying to "make sure" It sank. Though I agree normally yes plate buckling could cause flooding, the ship was already sinking and all evidence from the dives to the wreck since its discovery show that though the belt armour came off with the torp impacts, the inner citadel armour and turtleback armour was entirely intact with no cracks nor holes. In the end if the british continued to attack the Bismarck it would have probebly eventually sunk after an hour or two (possibly more if the german crew continued to try and keep it afloat), however if they completely left it be, it is completely agreed upon that it would have continued staying afloat for another 12-24hrs+.

    • @1993Crag
      @1993Crag 2 роки тому +4

      @@FutureFlash2034 Even according to the crew who said they did the scuttling and escaped, they didn't begin to do so prior to the 20 degree list. A list most major capital ships were abandoned at. Unless you're saying they started to scuttle with the crew on board and ship still fighting.
      If you're talking about Cameron or Ballard, they both said for the sections they could see. This missed the Port mid section that was under mud where most of the major surface torpedoes made impact.

  • @J_o_B_is_back
    @J_o_B_is_back 2 роки тому +28

    Anyone else got Sink the Bismarck by Johnny Horton stuck in their head now?

    • @nyrmetros
      @nyrmetros 2 роки тому +10

      Also Sabaton's Bismarck.

    • @BattleshipOrion
      @BattleshipOrion 2 роки тому

      Sabaton's song. And that's the only one. Well outside of of Last Stand, Primo Victoria, and Metallica's Orion.

    • @mjisabelle18
      @mjisabelle18 2 роки тому

      Homer and Jethro's parody of Johnny Horton Sink the Bismarck.

    • @jamesclendon4811
      @jamesclendon4811 2 роки тому +2

      Unfortunately I can't immediately dredge up the beginning of the song. All I keep thinking is "In 1814 we took a little trip; Along with Colonel Jackson down the mighty Mississipp'" Right singer, wrong song. Wrong war.

    • @J_o_B_is_back
      @J_o_B_is_back 2 роки тому

      @@jamesclendon4811 good song though 👌

  • @FuddZoomer1864
    @FuddZoomer1864 2 роки тому +5

    I’ve been waiting for a video on the Bismarck for a long time now

  • @KingdomofNefeisea
    @KingdomofNefeisea 2 роки тому +16

    From the mist a ship a shape is taking form.

    • @hallstuart6604
      @hallstuart6604 2 роки тому +3

      And the silence of the sea is about to drift into a storm

    • @David-qp9bq
      @David-qp9bq 2 роки тому +4

      @@hallstuart6604 Sign of power, Show of force.

    • @arandomfallschirmjagerdude9141
      @arandomfallschirmjagerdude9141 2 роки тому +2

      @@KingdomofNefeisea Raise the anchor, Battleship plotting its course

    • @KingdomofNefeisea
      @KingdomofNefeisea 2 роки тому +2

      @@arandomfallschirmjagerdude9141 Pride of a nation, a beast made of steel

    • @patrik5123
      @patrik5123 2 роки тому +2

      Damn. Beat me to the Sabaton reference.

  • @Gary85Paul
    @Gary85Paul 2 роки тому +2

    My grandfather was involved in the pursuit of Bismarck. He was on Ark Royal, which was ultimately the ship to end Bismarck's retreat.

    • @Skraeling1000
      @Skraeling1000 2 роки тому +1

      My grandad was on HMS Hood, he wasn't a survivor. Thank you, Gary's grandfather.

    • @Gary85Paul
      @Gary85Paul 2 роки тому

      @@Skraeling1000I'm sorry to hear that your grandfather was a victim of the magazine incident. Horrific event in naval history 🙁
      I think my grandfather served on Hood on occasions too. And Rodney. I really need to get his records out again. He got about as he was attached to one of the admirals. Maybe they knew each other. Who knows 🙂

  • @slyfox0086
    @slyfox0086 2 роки тому +6

    How did such a mispronunciation of Prinz Eugen make it to the final cut?

    • @ptrthgr8
      @ptrthgr8 2 роки тому +2

      Sorta painful. I know Simon is aware some mispronunciations are inevitable... but Prinz "you-jen?" Ouch. The Prinz Eugen is one of the most famous ships in history. Can't believe it was tortured like that.

    • @WhiteCamry
      @WhiteCamry 2 роки тому

      Because Simon is British.

    • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
      @AWMJoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому +2

      @@WhiteCamry No it's because he doesn't have a clue what he's talking about and is just reading off a script. Simon is always mispronouncing shit

  • @asparceproton1
    @asparceproton1 2 роки тому +2

    For some reason I've been super interested in this story lately and learning everything I can about it. That's crazy timing you decided to do a video on it now.

    • @Tim67620
      @Tim67620 2 роки тому +2

      Have you checked out all Drachinifel's accounts?

  • @dojokonojo
    @dojokonojo 2 роки тому +4

    An episode about the Bismarck but not sponsored by World of Warships, I'm shocked lol

  • @TheNetsrac
    @TheNetsrac 2 роки тому +2

    As a Dane, I remember learning about this ship in school (MANY moons ago)
    Love getting all the detailed information
    Thank you very much for the video 👍

  • @thefrecklepuny
    @thefrecklepuny 2 роки тому +3

    The 1960 movie 'Sink The Bismarck' staring Kenneth Moore is always worth a watch.

    • @kiwidiesel
      @kiwidiesel 2 роки тому +1

      That movie is worth the watch just for Dana Wynters, but great movie all the same.

  • @killerkoalafied5650
    @killerkoalafied5650 2 роки тому +1

    Grandfather served as a officer on the HMS Norfolk. He was present on the ship during the hunting of the bismark. My family still has photos of the bismark he took while hunting it. After the war he later became a Admiral.

  • @maxandmols9526
    @maxandmols9526 2 роки тому +5

    You should do a video on "the greatest raid of all time" the raid on St nazaire.. honestly it's completely mind blowing, and it's linked to the tirpitz as they were targeting the only dry Dock on the Atlantic that was big enough for her.. more Victoria crosses were issued during this raid.. and if you haven't heard about it.. find out about it because its honestly it's just insane.

    • @richardstraun
      @richardstraun 2 роки тому +2

      Clarkson did a documentary on it. It is available on UA-cam.

    • @ald1144
      @ald1144 2 роки тому

      @@richardstraun ua-cam.com/video/SCMCr2Kh1wI/v-deo.html I think he did a great job with it too.

  • @grahamariss2111
    @grahamariss2111 2 роки тому +2

    I think you mean the Tirpitz saw considerably less action at sea, on the few occasions it had fuel to sail it failed to confront anything and famously backed out of going up against HMS Duke of York and HMS Renown when they were detected escorting an Artic Convoy she was vectored onto.

  • @pauldamm3345
    @pauldamm3345 2 роки тому +5

    Drachinifel has a very detailed breakdown of this battle. He also has the the best channel on UA-cam for naval ships and and battle breakdowns that is produced in English.

  • @jerryrichard1857
    @jerryrichard1857 Рік тому +2

    There was a very good film, “Sink the Bismarck” that shows a dramatized version of the story.

  • @abnurtharn2927
    @abnurtharn2927 2 роки тому +20

    From the mist, a shape, a ship, is taking form
    And the silence of the sea is about to drift into a storm
    Sign of power, show of force
    Raise the anchor, battleship's plotting its course
    Pride of a nation, a beast made of steel
    Bismarck in motion, king of the ocean

    • @nicksivert5431
      @nicksivert5431 2 роки тому

      I got goosebumps from just reading it.

    • @abnurtharn2927
      @abnurtharn2927 2 роки тому +4

      @@nicksivert5431 Then you should check out the Sabaton video, Bismarck. If you don't already have seen it.

    • @nicksivert5431
      @nicksivert5431 2 роки тому +2

      @@abnurtharn2927 I’ve watched it multiple times. 😎

    • @abnurtharn2927
      @abnurtharn2927 2 роки тому

      @@nicksivert5431 😀👍

  • @MisterDemonTC
    @MisterDemonTC 2 роки тому

    Bismark was the first ship that truly got me into WW1-2 history. I read a book written about it in like 4th grade and was immediately hooked. I could watch a thousand different videos about her and never get bored.

  • @waynec3563
    @waynec3563 2 роки тому +5

    3:41 "The Tirpitz saw considerably more action at sea"
    I'm not sure that was true. The Tirpitz only had one offensive operation where it fired its main guns. It mainly spent the war in port.
    There were several British attempts to sink the Tirpitz. That would be worth a Megaprojects video too.

    • @ianashby6294
      @ianashby6294 2 роки тому

      Same as sharnhorst

    • @andersjjensen
      @andersjjensen 2 роки тому

      Yes, and there is very good movie about it which name I can't forget. It focuses on the attempts to make tiny submarines to place under water charges on it.

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 2 роки тому

      @@andersjjensen _"Above Us The Waves"_ right?

    • @andersjjensen
      @andersjjensen 2 роки тому

      @@peterson7082 Ah yes. Thank you good Sir! :D

    • @jamesharding3459
      @jamesharding3459 2 роки тому

      Ah, but Tirpitz sailed more than once, no?

  • @peterverhauwen4762
    @peterverhauwen4762 2 роки тому +1

    You have forgotten to mention the one Bismarck survivor adopted by the British Royal Navy 'Oskar'. A brave cat later renamed (unsinkable) Sam. Oskar the cat was found floating on a board and picked from the water by a British destroyer. He served on 2 British destroyers before retiring in Gibraltar. You can google him.

  • @kingsteven7
    @kingsteven7 2 роки тому +15

    So we got Yamato and Bismarck who were defeated can we get the Iowa sisters who are still with us today

    • @ADRIAAN1007
      @ADRIAAN1007 2 роки тому +1

      bystanders don't get recognition

    • @mailenstein4805
      @mailenstein4805 2 роки тому +1

      Bismarck and Yamato have a legend. the Iowa class came to late to WW2 and the age of battleships was already over. Aircraft Carriers rule the sea.

  • @markstott6689
    @markstott6689 2 роки тому +2

    The Battle off Samar would be a worthwhile project.

    • @siliconwolverine
      @siliconwolverine 8 місяців тому

      Last stand of the tin can sailors. Destroyer escorts and jeep carriers took on the biggest Japanese fleet to ever sail.

  • @K1W1fly
    @K1W1fly 2 роки тому +8

    You are going to offend a lot of people with the title "English Naval Supremacy" - Its BRITISH, not English - I would have thought a guy who does a geography channel would know the difference!

    • @owenshebbeare2999
      @owenshebbeare2999 2 роки тому +3

      Blame the ignorant American scriptwriters and editors.

    • @grantm902
      @grantm902 2 роки тому +1

      Especially when a sizeable proportion of Royal Navy ships were built on the River Clyde

    • @18robsmith
      @18robsmith 2 роки тому +1

      @@grantm902 If not the Clyde, then in Belfast.....

    • @n111254789
      @n111254789 2 роки тому +1

      @@owenshebbeare2999 The man who read that script was British, can't always be our fault old chap. He didn't care and neither do we.

  • @Wxwy
    @Wxwy 2 роки тому +1

    With videos such as the one covering the Yamato on the channel, I've been waiting for one on the Bismarck, and it's finally here!

  • @Dalamarian
    @Dalamarian 2 роки тому +8

    I would love to hear the history of HMS Warspite

    • @owenshebbeare2999
      @owenshebbeare2999 2 роки тому +1

      Longest successful hit, plus a long service.

    • @alanwilkin8869
      @alanwilkin8869 2 роки тому +3

      Drachinifel does a really good vid on HMS Warspite,
      Her officers and crew musta been either, the luckiest afloat or the toughest and best trained,

    • @SabreSix1980
      @SabreSix1980 2 роки тому +1

      @@alanwilkin8869 Luckiest ship is USS Massachusetts, not a single fatality during it's service.

    • @TheMagusOfTheMagnaCarta
      @TheMagusOfTheMagnaCarta 2 роки тому

      Battleship Snipa! 360noscoped another ship 16miles out

  • @grahamariss2111
    @grahamariss2111 2 роки тому +1

    At the range they were, the Hood's armour was more than enough to protect her from the German guns, it should not have blown up, however the clue is in some of the hits scored on both Bismarck and Prince of Wales in which shells dived under the belt armour of the ships. The reason being that the battle was run at full speed and the pressure of wakes of the ships deflected incoming shells causing them to dive below the armour belt.
    Also Prince of Wales did not stagger away, she was still capable of full speed and had suffered no damage to her guns and critically its radar fire control systems for her 14" guns, the malfunctions due to her still being debugged from the builders not battle damage, she unjammed her turrets and joined the shadowing cruisers and those two subsequent engagements were led by her with the Bismarck choosing ot to slog it out with her but use the fog to evade her. She only returned to Iceland for fuel and repairs after hunting for her for another 12 hours in the fog and was kept ready to act as a block should Bismarck try to double back.

    • @Cailus3542
      @Cailus3542 2 роки тому

      Check out Drachnifel's video on the subject. He goes into more detail about just how insanely fortunate the shell that sunk Hood was.

    • @grahamariss2111
      @grahamariss2111 2 роки тому

      @@Cailus3542 I have, it is an excellent video

  • @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass
    @SonOfAB_tch2ndClass 2 роки тому +48

    We’ll find the German Battleship that’s making such a fuss we gotta sink the Bismarck cause the world depends on us!

    • @Ssgt02
      @Ssgt02 2 роки тому +12

      Hit the decks a-runnin' boys and spin those guns around
      When we find the Bismarck we gotta cut her down!

    • @mrabintom
      @mrabintom 2 роки тому +7

      Pride of a Nation, a beast made of steel, Bismarck in motion, king of the ocean, he was made to rule the waves across the seven seas!

    • @BattleshipOrion
      @BattleshipOrion 2 роки тому +2

      Change the lyrics bub. Get with the times. Sabaton.

  • @jameswaterfield
    @jameswaterfield 2 роки тому +1

    It was not a 'supership'. Over all, the armour of the Bismarck was remarkably similar to that of the Hood. It just had it's deck armour in a single layer and not spread out over three decks. Thus a plunging 380mm shell managed to penetrate three individual 1 inch armour plates when it may very well have failed to penetrate a single 3.5 inch armour plate. If the Germans had waited six months for Operation Rheinübung, they would have met with the fast Battleship HMS Hood, with a unified deck armour and updated fire control, instead of Battlecruiser HMS Hood, which was pulled out of dry dock to intercept the Bismarck. As it was, although the hood was lost in the Battle of the Denmark Straight, it could be argued that the Bismarck suffered a strategic defeat, as damage (4,000 tons of water in-board) forced it to cut short its sortie against the convoys and return to port.

  • @celltanic
    @celltanic 2 роки тому +6

    If you start a reaction channel (probably on the cards :) ) do the official music video of Sabaton Bismarck first!!!

  • @nitsu2947
    @nitsu2947 2 роки тому +2

    the rudder became so popular, a phenomenon where a torpedo hitting and damaging the rudder in WoWs is called "Bismarcked"

  • @placidoescalera8978
    @placidoescalera8978 2 роки тому +3

    Incredible the role of decrypting messages. It made possible sink Bismark. Does Megaprojects channel have a Colossus computer video? I haven't found it. It could be an interesting one

  • @Philip271828
    @Philip271828 2 роки тому +2

    Quick note, at the ranges recorded, Bismarck's shells would be ~11° from horizontal. There's a picture of the turret roof of Dunkerque which has had a shell from a 15"/42 shell skip off it at a slightly shallower angle, if you can find it.
    By the time battleship shells are falling near vertically they are far beyond any practical battle range.

    • @jimbluma2558
      @jimbluma2558 2 роки тому

      Don't forget to add the tilt of the target ship to that, according to Ted Briggs, one of the three Hood survivors, his ship was inclined at least 15 degrees toward the Bismarck when hit by the fatal shell due to the high speed turn to port.

    • @Philip271828
      @Philip271828 2 роки тому

      @@jimbluma2558 The problem with the Person Account is that none of the other accounts can agree on whether or not Hood had begun her turn. Ted Briggs was blown off Hood, had a building dropped on him and nearly drowned, so I don't need to call him a liar to be sceptical. I'm similarly doubtful of the details of Burkard Baron von Mullenheim-Rechberg's account.
      My preferred explanation is that Hood's hull flexed as the turn commenced which opened a flame path from the secondary magazine. his should start a fire at the back, where it may be less visible so there is insufficient time to flood the magazine. I like this because it's in line with how industrial accidents usually occur (ratchetting stupidity) and doesn't require a million to one shot.
      ua-cam.com/video/CLPeC7LRqIY/v-deo.html&t

  • @fastandfhurious3213
    @fastandfhurious3213 2 роки тому +20

    Who would win : a state of the art german flag battleship that had the power to change the war or some stringy bois loaded with explosive seals

    • @Metallica4Life92
      @Metallica4Life92 2 роки тому

      Don't underestimate the RAF, good sir ^^

    • @WarblesOnALot
      @WarblesOnALot 2 роки тому +6

      @@Metallica4Life92
      G'day,
      Why not underestimate the RAF..., in the sinking of the Bismark...?
      The Stringbags (Swordfish) which torpedoed the Bismark had NOTHING to do with the RAF...; the Swordfish were operated by the Royal Navy Fleet Air Arm.
      Wake up to yourself.
      ;-p
      Ciao !

    • @Metallica4Life92
      @Metallica4Life92 2 роки тому

      @@WarblesOnALot twas just a joke.. :/

    • @notapplicable531
      @notapplicable531 2 роки тому

      @@Metallica4Life92 Some jokes just are not jokes! And some people should never create/try telling one!

    • @WarblesOnALot
      @WarblesOnALot 2 роки тому

      @@Metallica4Life92
      Ah, there there, nivertheemoind ; you did too good a job of masquerading as one of the Video-Game "Educated" Warriorist Enthusiasts.
      I took you at your word, y'see.
      Such is life,
      Have a good one...
      Stay safe.
      ;-p
      Ciao !

  • @your_being_led_by_your_nose
    @your_being_led_by_your_nose 2 роки тому +1

    Always a winner!

  • @skyden24195
    @skyden24195 2 роки тому +6

    Q: How do you sink a Megaprojects battleship?
    A: With a Megaprojects attack.

  • @tgmccoy1556
    @tgmccoy1556 2 роки тому +1

    Fairey Swordfish WW1 throwback, but effective.
    It continued in service for most of the war .

  • @hollowvoices1268
    @hollowvoices1268 2 роки тому +3

    I'm surprised you didn't include the little detail that ensured that the Bis wouldn't make it back to port. During one of the battles, her rudder was damaged and she had absolutely no steering for the remainder of her life

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 2 роки тому +2

      The damage to the rudder was mentioned.

  • @rep3e4
    @rep3e4 2 роки тому

    Awesome thanks very much

  • @JPBennett
    @JPBennett 2 роки тому +12

    Sabaton has entered the chat...

    • @nyrmetros
      @nyrmetros 2 роки тому

      Sabaton collaboration with Mega Projects?

  • @fuckYTIDontWantToUseMyRealName
    @fuckYTIDontWantToUseMyRealName 2 роки тому +1

    This story really highlights the power of intel in war. Knowing where the Bismark was and what was with it made a huge difference. Had the codebreakers not intercepted that comm, the Bismark could have done what the u-boats did with the liberty ships but much, much worse. Brittan could have been choked off, leaving the Allies nowhere to launch from on D-day, leaving Europe to the Nazis. One codebreaker changed the whole war.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 роки тому

      Just "one" codebreaker? That is the result of Lefty agenda bending the truth again, there were THOUSANDS involved in the decryption efforts, with many, deeply influential, though largely unknown, people (apart from the one gentleman beloved of the lefties) directing those efforts.

    • @fuckYTIDontWantToUseMyRealName
      @fuckYTIDontWantToUseMyRealName 2 роки тому

      @@walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Holy fuck, people like you are why people disregard conservatives.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 2 роки тому +1

      You grossly overestimate the power of one battleship and one heavy cruiser. In the Atlantic, the British had the ability to scatter a convoy very quickly, as had happened previously. Moreover, Lutjens had already abandoned his mission after Bismarck had been damaged by Prince of Wales, and he was already trying to get to St. Nazaire for repairs.
      After 24 May, the convoys were in no danger from German surface warships.

  • @brazenbunnies
    @brazenbunnies 2 роки тому +5

    I understand that there is only so much time, but I think you should have mentioned that Bismarck was disabled by a bi-plane.

    • @Simonsvids
      @Simonsvids 2 роки тому +1

      It was mentioned at 16.08 that a Fairey Swordfish jammed the rudder.

    • @brazenbunnies
      @brazenbunnies 2 роки тому

      I stand corrected. Thanks

  • @AshenDruid
    @AshenDruid 2 роки тому

    Good stuff, thank you! I've been looking forward to you covering this, it's one of my favorite ww2 stories. It's got everything, drama, tragedy, suspense, and Churchill probably foaming at the mouth. And the code breaker getting the message, that's a third act turn around right there.

  • @andrewszigeti2174
    @andrewszigeti2174 2 роки тому +46

    And yet. a twenty-year old battleship 60% it's displacement spanked it in it's final battle, due largely to a major failing in the design. The conduits from the main fire control directors to the main guns ran ABOVE the armored deck, and got taken out in the first of many 16" shells Rodney would pommel it with in Bismark's final battle.

    • @Morris2182
      @Morris2182 2 роки тому +10

      HMS Rodney was a beast of a ship, you should take a trip to the maritime museum on Liverpool docks if you’re interested. They have the ships bell and a large amount of history on her in a display 😊

    • @andrewszigeti2174
      @andrewszigeti2174 2 роки тому +15

      @@Morris2182 Liverpool is a bit far from New Mexico for convenience, but if I ever get out there it's on the list.
      Drachinifel gives a much better evaluation of the Bismark in his videos on the subject.

    • @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t
      @f0rth3l0v30fchr15t 2 роки тому +9

      And the difficulty Bismarck had with manoevering owing to the jammed rudder and list to port and trim to the bow caused by flooding due to a hit from Prince of Wales meant that even while the FCDs were operational, it couldn't hit a barn from the inside.

    • @snebbywebby2587
      @snebbywebby2587 2 роки тому +5

      Probably one of the most inefficient battleship designs. Not bad, but not amazing either

    • @owenshebbeare2999
      @owenshebbeare2999 2 роки тому +5

      @@snebbywebby2587 It really was just a modified WW2 design, based on the Bayern, sharing its faults, strengths, layout and not a great deal more from the old design. Definitely capable, but not cutting edge by the time she was conceived.

  • @dorian_xvs7953
    @dorian_xvs7953 2 роки тому +1

    I'm glad thet you've mentioned Polish ORP Piorun, but what you didn't tell was that she was the first ship to spot Bismarck and open fire and withstand Bismarck's response to allow British ships to come. Piorun was just a destroyer so much less powerful than Bismarck. Quite often the British forget about others who did the job

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 2 роки тому +2

      You are exaggerating Piorun's role. She was operating as part of Captain Vian's destroyer flotilla. Moreover, she was the only vessel from the flotilla to fail to make a torpedo attack.
      By the time Vian arrived, Bismarck's stumbling progress was being constantly monitored by HMS Sheffield, and Tovey's main force was simply holding off until dawn.

    • @daneelolivaw602
      @daneelolivaw602 2 роки тому

      how can the British ever forget, there is always someone like you reminding us. ORP Piorun was the Royal Navy destroyer, Nerissa, loaned to the Polish navy while she was still under construction, that is not often mentioned is it, there were about five other destroyers keeping the crew of Bismarck on their toes all night, the polish ship was not on its own.

  • @dwchen1
    @dwchen1 2 роки тому +3

    Arleigh Burke-class destroyer please... 68 active out of 89 planned, that's no small number for a major frontline warsips weigh almost ten thousand tons in the history of naval power.

    • @admiraltiberius1989
      @admiraltiberius1989 2 роки тому

      Its likely gonna exceed 100 for US construction before they are done. Plus the Japanese, South Korean and Australian varieties that borrow heavily from the Burke class.

  • @dennishernandez5434
    @dennishernandez5434 2 роки тому

    Got and stayed for an 2 hour long UA-cam original ad for LeBron's school. Made me cry. The kids and staff... their stories, their growth... it's moving.

  • @vairrex9966
    @vairrex9966 2 роки тому +26

    If you want the best video on Bismarck go to Drachinifel's one of the best naval historians on UA-cam.

    • @johnarnold893
      @johnarnold893 2 роки тому +4

      Yup, this guy takes stories that have been told and retold and tries to make them his own.

    • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
      @AWMJoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому +2

      One of the best? More like the best!

  • @loupiscanis9449
    @loupiscanis9449 2 роки тому

    Thank you

  • @TheTyrantOfMars
    @TheTyrantOfMars 2 роки тому +7

    I mean she wasn’t the Deathstar people seem to imply she was, Bismarck didn’t have anywhere near the firepower or armour of HMS Nelson or Rodney

  • @montithered4741
    @montithered4741 Рік тому

    A war at sea. A war with no battles, no monuments... only casualties.

  • @David-qp9bq
    @David-qp9bq 2 роки тому +6

    The Flagship of the Navy the Terror on the seas, His guns have gone silent at last. 🇩🇪

  • @maxpayne2574
    @maxpayne2574 2 роки тому +2

    The fact that one of the antiquated Swordfish bombers had torpedoed the steering gear leaving Bismark stuck in a slow turn doomed her.

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 2 роки тому +2

      The torpedo strike negated Bismarck's only true exceptional ability.... her power to run away. Once she was "hobbled", she was, as you say, doomed.

  • @ADRIAAN1007
    @ADRIAAN1007 2 роки тому +14

    Little bit of a nit pick, but battleship Bismarck was a "He" e.g. He was the king of the seas. One of the very few ships that are christened as male

    • @filipkonopacki1547
      @filipkonopacki1547 2 роки тому

      @ADRIAAN1007 Interesting comment on the Bismarck’s manliness but it left me ever so slightly confused. In all English language sources available to me, Bismarck is always referred to as “she”, just like any other ship, so I’m assuming that you were talking about the German designation. The Bismarck was christened in Germany after all. Now, my German is far from perfect but I read a German Wikipedia article on the Bismarck, where the ship was referred to as “die Bismarck”. All the other ships mentioned there are also feminine (die Prinz Eugen, die Hood and so on). The only time the article refers to a ship as neutral or masculine is “das Schlachtshiff Bismarck” or “der Kreuzer Prinz Eugen”. Like I said, my German is not that good so I’m probably missing some important sources. Please could you point me in the right direction? Many thanks in advance!

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 2 роки тому +1

      “King of the seas” lmao sunk on its maiden voyage

    • @jb76489
      @jb76489 2 роки тому

      @Donewitu that’s why it’s at the bottom of the ocean, cause it didn’t sink

    • @filipkonopacki1547
      @filipkonopacki1547 2 роки тому

      @@jb76489 Jeeez, how old are you? Five?

  • @davidelliott5843
    @davidelliott5843 2 місяці тому

    Drachinifel has a compelling theory that HMS Hood was actually hit below her armoured belt. At full speed her wake dipped well below the normal waterline. Bismarck got lucky.

  • @mbryson2899
    @mbryson2899 2 роки тому +25

    The Scharnhorst had far more interesting genesis and career.

    • @owenshebbeare2999
      @owenshebbeare2999 2 роки тому +4

      It did, if less colourful. The German battleships of WW2 really didn't do much in terms of offensive actions, but they did tie up resources. Myths around Bismarck, Scharnhorst and Gneisenau and Tirpitz abound, but the real stories are more interesting.

    • @TTTT-oc4eb
      @TTTT-oc4eb 2 роки тому +1

      Gneisenau had almost exactly the same career - and most of her crew even survived the war. For some strange reason she always seems to be in the shadow of her sister.
      The Twins did far more damage than Bismarck, but for sheer drama nothing beats Bismarck's first and final sortie.

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 2 роки тому +2

      @@TTTT-oc4eb Because her story ended after _CERBERUS_ basically. _Scharnhorsts_ lasted up until December the following year. The British raid was incredibly successful with that single hit on the bow which detonated the magazines for turret "Anton"

  • @nmxsanchez
    @nmxsanchez 2 роки тому

    The namesake was even more impressive. Now there's a megaproject: the unification of germany

  • @deee5520
    @deee5520 2 роки тому +4

    You know I might be interested in Magellan if I knew how much it was. $? By the way that was a great video. I’ve watched the movie SINK THE BISMARCK many times and always think how sad so many lives were lost.

    • @ripsumrall8018
      @ripsumrall8018 2 роки тому +2

      Do you have to be spoon fed everything? SMH

    • @Tim67620
      @Tim67620 2 роки тому

      The RN ships started to take on German sailors but received a Submarine alert and had to abandon many who died waiting for German help.

  • @SitInTheShayd
    @SitInTheShayd 2 роки тому +2

    If you haven't watched The Operations Room video on the sinking of Bismark you should

  • @navnig
    @navnig 2 роки тому +3

    Bismarck, while extremely powerful, was based on an older, semi-flawed design.

    • @saberdogface
      @saberdogface 2 роки тому +2

      Baden class, a post WW1 design?

    • @navnig
      @navnig 2 роки тому +1

      @@saberdogface Spot on! Obviously a very much modernised (at that time) take on that design but it formed the basis of what the Bismarck & Tirpitz became.

    • @saberdogface
      @saberdogface 2 роки тому +2

      @@navnig Thank you, sir! Not an expert, but I do recall reading about Bismark design history somewhere.

  • @huntercurts9998
    @huntercurts9998 2 роки тому +2

    @Megaprojects Naval history is always amazing to learn! You should cover Richelieu sometime! Her history and design is amazing to learn about!

  • @vairrex9966
    @vairrex9966 2 роки тому +3

    I don't understand this video Bismarck was a 50k ton ship with the capability of a 35k ton ship. She was so heavy becuase she was inefficiency. It like a heavy weight doing ok against medium weight. Yeah she hits hard but not for her weight class. I also hate the lie that the German sunk Bismarck. In the final battle all her guns and command staff where gone very quickly. The British sunk Bismarck the German just speed it up at the very end.

    • @lilyeves892
      @lilyeves892 2 роки тому

      I loved when he mentioned that the hood was considered on par with the bismark, a ship about 10000 tonnes lighter that's 20 years older and has been in active service the majority of the time. Granted I do give the Germans a bit a leeway they hadn't built a battleship since ww1

    • @AWMJoeyjoejoe
      @AWMJoeyjoejoe 2 роки тому

      I agree. I like to compare Bismarck to Rodney; a ship built 15 years earlier at 10,000 tons lower combat displacement but had better firepower and armour. Bismarck was an inefficient overrated white elephant!

    • @admiralfloofz658
      @admiralfloofz658 2 роки тому

      @@AWMJoeyjoejoe Bismarck had almost twice the firepower of the Nelson class. Higher armor penetration, much higher muzzle velocity, better explosive charge and almost twice the rate of fire. One inch extra in barrel diameter means little when you have twice as long reload and worse characteristics in every measurable way.
      You can argue all you want about Bismarck as a ship but the SK C/34 guns are amoung the best Naval guns ever constructed, rivaled only by the Iowa class 50 cal Mark 7.

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 2 роки тому

      @@admiralfloofz658 The armor penetration would have been true for the _Nelson's_ early on in their life. Certainly one of the best naval guns out there- but I don't think it's advantageous over the Royal Ordnance B.L. 16"/45-caliber _Mark 1's_

  • @isaacibbotson4632
    @isaacibbotson4632 Рік тому

    Oh boy I was really hoping to hear about the Skidmark excuse me Bismark again

  • @chris639
    @chris639 2 роки тому +3

    The Bismark was actually a he. It was notable because it didn't adhere to tradition. Check out sabaton histories video on it.

    • @BattleshipOrion
      @BattleshipOrion 2 роки тому

      Which is said to ultimately doom the ship according to maritime legend.

  • @admiralinvertebrate5649
    @admiralinvertebrate5649 2 місяці тому

    Before I came across this video, I had no idea that a Polish destroyer was involved in the hunt for the Bismarck. A video on the Polish armed forces that managed to escape German troops would be quite interesting. To me at least. It is known that the members of the RAF (Royal Air Force) 303 Fighter Squadron were in fact Polish. That unit was actually one of the units that did pretty well in the Battle of Britain in 1940. Their story has been immortalized in the legendary Sabaton song *Aces in Exile*

    • @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684
      @walterkronkitesleftshoe6684 Місяць тому

      ORP Piorun was just one of the 5 destroyers of the RN 4th Destroyer flotilla (commanded by Captain Philip Vian). The flotilla had just raced to the scene of operations in the late evening of the 26th May 1941 after having been detached from its previous escort duty of the troop convoy WS8B. On their arrival the light cruiser HMS Sheffield (Part of the RN's Mediterranean "Force H") who had been shadowing Bismarck using her radar had just lost contact with the German battleship after shell splinters from one of her broadsides had damaged Sheffield's radar antenna.
      Captain Vian immediately ordered his 5 charges to deploy in a fan shaped search pattern along the expected course of Bismarck, and it was purely by chance that ORP Piorun (Commanded by Eugeniusz Pławski) was the first of the 5 destroyers to regain contact with the German battleship shortly before 11pm.
      Pławski radioed to the other ships that he had contact, and Capt Vian ordered him to maintain that contact while the other 4 destroyers rushed to join him so they could make a joint synchronised night torpedo attack on the German leviathon.
      Instead Captain Pławski valiantly, but misguidedly, chose to ignore those orders and instead rushed headlong into a one sided "pop gun" Vs "battleship guns" gunnery duel. He maintained this brave but pointless exercise for just over an hour before a consecutive number of main and secondary salvoes from Bismarck bracketted his little ship, whereupon he chose to withdraw having completely forgotten to use his most effective weapon (that being Piorun's 5 x 21in torpedo tubes) possibly because he was more focussed on signalling his Polish anger to Bismarck's crew. While withdrawing he managed to permanently lose contact with Bismarck in the gathering Atlantic darkness and never remade it.
      Luckily by this point, the other 4 RN destroyers had also located Bismarck and it was THEY (minus Piorun) that engaged Bismarck from midnight until ordered to withdraw by Admiral Tovey at 7am on the 27th May 1941, having exhausted Bismarck's crew for the coming final battle.
      The video also omits to name the other 4 RN destroyers that DID actually engage Bismarck all night, after Piorun had lost contact with Bismarck at around 00.30.
      Can you name any of those OTHER 4 RN destroyers in that flotilla by any chance? My guess is you won't have ANY idea of the identity of those EQUALLY brave and gallant warships.

  • @originiumresearchinstitute1044
    @originiumresearchinstitute1044 2 роки тому +18

    While listening to Simon list of all the ships involved, all I could picture are the girls from Azur Lane.

    • @ilovecoffeev
      @ilovecoffeev 2 роки тому +2

      Cultured, I see.

    • @mailenstein4805
      @mailenstein4805 2 роки тому +1

      Same

    • @scottcampbell4678
      @scottcampbell4678 2 роки тому

      The girls from Azur Lane after actual warships from all over the world. I have to commend the writers for the dedication required to research the names. However, they did get one wrong. The Laffey, which they modeled as a British ship was actually an American destroyer.

  • @NeilStansbury
    @NeilStansbury 2 роки тому

    Simon, your videos are always supremely interesting, from Russian gulags, to undersea cables and grand battleships, "smashing the like button" never seems to do them justice.

  • @trevortrevortsr2
    @trevortrevortsr2 2 роки тому +3

    The Bishmark was'nt that great its amour layout was inferior to KG5 and some might say even the old Rodney - it was sinking and about to be hit by a spread of torpedos from the cruieser Dorchester under its armour belt as it was listing bad - it never scored a single hit on the 2 battleships that brought it down or even managed to shoot down one of the slow 80mph bi planes that crippled her - not such a great ship as this post would have you believe - its only claim to fame is it sank a WW1 mostly built battle cruieser

  • @georgewilliams8448
    @georgewilliams8448 2 роки тому

    Thank you for another well done and informative video. Whenever I see that another Megaprojects video is available to watch I know that I will be enjoying a treat soon!

  • @rayofhope1114
    @rayofhope1114 2 роки тому +7

    It is tiresome how this video makes out that Bismark was built with superior arms,armour etc. Just to compare ships built at similar times - the King George V had much thicker armour , a heavier broadside of (16,000lb against 14,400 for Bismark) and had 16 secondary guns against 12 for Bismark and 64 AA guns against 46 for Bismark. Yes - Bismark was a powerful ship but it was never some sort of super ship that outmatched anything the RN could offer. Also of note is that Bismark only made 1 sortie and failed at the 1st attempt.

    • @TTTT-oc4eb
      @TTTT-oc4eb 2 роки тому +3

      KGV did not have much thicker armor, they were pretty comparable. Compared to its weight, Bismarck had more tonnage dedicated to armor. In 1941 KGV had 32 AA guns. And in 1941 it could rarely (if ever) fire all 10 main guns in a salvo. The main guns of Bismarck also had better penetration. As for secondary guns; Bismarcks was heavier calibre anti-ship only, while KGVs were dual-purpose. Bismarck was faster and had much better range than KGV. After they had worked out the teething problems with the quads, the KGVs were formidable ships, though.

    • @youraveragescotsman7119
      @youraveragescotsman7119 2 роки тому +2

      @@TTTT-oc4eb
      Bismarck had 12.6" of belt armour, the KGV's had 14.7" of belt armour. That's a little far away from "comparable" my friend.
      KGV had her AA and her secondaries all capable of engaging Planes, while Bismarck had a weird assortment of AA guns and no dual-purpose guns to engage Planes.

    • @TTTT-oc4eb
      @TTTT-oc4eb 2 роки тому +2

      @@youraveragescotsman7119 There's mor to armor than just the belt armor. POW sunk after receiving far less damage than Bismarck did.
      KGVs secondaries were too heavy for AA and too light for anti-ship and was generally far less effective than the US 4 inch guns.

    • @SabreSix1980
      @SabreSix1980 2 роки тому +1

      @@TTTT-oc4eb POW received a torpedo hit on the strut that supported the port outboard shaft, while it was at full power. This caused water to pour directly into the engine room through the shaft and the bent shaft caused the spinning propeller to chew into the hull. And people then claim that the hit on Bismarck's rudder was lucky....

  • @OhYeaMista
    @OhYeaMista Рік тому +1

    It’s funny how Bismarck achieved this mythic status when in reality she would have been the least heavily armed battleship in the Royal navy by weight of broadside had she been commissioned into that fleet instead.

    • @dovetonsturdee7033
      @dovetonsturdee7033 10 місяців тому

      She was better armoured than the QEs or the Rs, but her armour did not compare to a Nelson or a KGV.

  • @mrabintom
    @mrabintom 2 роки тому +6

    You should try the songs Bismarck, by Sabaton and Sink the Bismarck by Johnny Horton! Fair winds and following seas!