Headstart: Ex-SC Associate Justice Antonio Carpio on China's claims in WPS, ICC developments | ANC
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 вер 2024
- Karen Davila talks to former Supreme Court Associate Justice Antonio Carpio on the latest developments in the West Philippine Sea and the International Criminal Court's probe into the Duterte drug war.
Join ANC PRESTIGE to get access to perks:
/ @ancalerts
For more ANC Interviews, click the link below:
• ANC Interviews
For more Rundown videos, click the link below:
• Rundown
For more ANC Highlights videos, click the link below:
• ANC Highlights
Subscribe to the ANC UA-cam channel!
/ ancalerts
Visit our website at news.abs-cbn.c...
Facebook: / ancalerts
Twitter: / ancalerts
#NewsAlert
#LatestNews
#ANC
Thank you Ms. Karen Davila for inviting Retired Senior Associate Justice Antonio Carpio in your program this morning. He is expert in this subject of the WPS. God bless you both..
ARROYO AND DUTERTE SHOULD BE PUT IN CHAINS! WHY ARE THEY STILL ALLOWED TO WALK FREE?
Pilipinas huwag matakot. Tayo na ng outpost jan. Protect Reed bank. It's for the Philippines and the next generation of Filipinos.
Justice Carpio, the lesson is not to put TRAITORS in Malacanang.
totoo yan
We need a person like FJ Carpio in our country please sir run for office in our government next election 😢 at least for senator.
God bless you. Sir: Justice Antonio Carpio..
❤Justice Carpio
Thank you
Dapat magkaroon na ng chairman sa wps para kung maibenta ang wps islands , bigtihin na Lang ang chairman
Davila you are like trillanes
Yes, China doesn’t have any right to know what Filipinos want to do in their Own territory
Pwede po ba lagyan ng barrier lahat ng sakop ng pilipinas
How does a country rejoin the ICC?
tagal naman umaksyon. dba dato pa sabi na mag lagay ng structure? hanggan ngayon wala pa ? ma occupy na yan
I love all the president in this. Country
YAN KASI ANG HIRAP SA PRESIDENTENG ANG LAYUNIN LAMANG AY " TO STAY IN POWER " AND " TO ENRICH THEMSELVES " TULAD NI ARROYO AT DUTERTE , KAYA LAGING NAU-UTAKAN NG KALABAN ! ! !
I believe, one of the problems we have is, there are too many personnel speaking and explaining regarding WPS. Our government should have a mechanism that only one department/authorized person to explain and speak regarding WPS.
CN not compliant to unclos and coc by building bases in PH eez
Yayaman na ang mga pilipino
God bless SC carpio
junior will be too scared to order the construction of any outpost or station or gas exploration in our EZZ. he is all talk but lame in action 🇵🇭
Yes😊
I pray President Bongbong Marcos could think about this...
Mamahalin ng halos karamihan. Kahit hindi pilipino ang magpapahalaga sa. Pag angat ng buhay ng mga tao
Dapat😊
Eto justice na kulang sa pansin
Wasn't UNCLOS clear that China should not be present within the Philippine EEZ? They shouldn't have been there in the first place. Period. Their presence there was an act of lawlessness, transgression of international law, and defiance of the rules-based global order. Secondly, it is within the rights of the Philippines to do whatever it wants within its EEZ, as long as it doesn't violate international law as stipulated by UNCLOS.
i think unclos was very clear on the disputes, that ph has exclusive rights within ph eez ( means natural resources such as fishing, extracting of oil ) but it doesnt restrict anyone to stay there. it also recommends that both parties should end the disputes bilateraly. lastly if an armed conflict will erupt, that it will no longer have jurisdiction as these matters are outside their scope. sadly ruling is non binding so its up to parties involve to adhere or neglect the decision
@@kEnzmacoolet The Permanent Court of Arbitration’s 479-page ruling14 was overwhelmingly favorable to the Philippines’ position, ruling several elements of China’s claims in the South China Sea unlawful. Key findings of the ruling include:
China’s claims to historic rights and resources within its nine-dash line have no legal basis.
None of China’s claimed land features in the Spratly Islands are an island capable of generating a 200-nm exclusive economic zone.
China violated the Philippines’ sovereign rights by interfering with Philippine oil exploration activities, prohibiting Philippine fishing vessels from operating, failing to prevent Chinese fishing vessels from operating, and conducting land reclamation in areas where the Philippines enjoys sovereign rights to explore for and exploit natural resources.
China violated its marine environmental protection obligations under UNCLOS by causing “severe harm to the coral reef environment” with its land reclamation activities and harvesting of endangered species.
China is legally bound by the tribunal’s ruling by virtue of its ratification of UNCLOS. The extent to which, and how, the tribunal’s ruling might be enforced is an open question, however; the Philippines and others may be able to pursue a range of legal options to punish China should it fail to abide by the ruling, or open negotiations to resolve the matter.
If the ruling fails to alter China’s behavior in the longer term, it would send a signal to the rest of the world that adherence to international law is optional. This would degrade the viability of international maritime law as a tool to ensure the peaceful, stable, and lawful use of the seas.
@@c0smicbyte okee i stand corrected, but big butt😳 if we follow ur line of argument that parties are legally binded 'by virtue of ratification', why u.n resolutions can be non binding given we ratified on u.n convention aswell?
@@c0smicbyte Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
@@kEnzmacoolet Do you know the difference between arbitration and trial? Arbitration will only be effective when both parties agree. You have sent a bunch of things, but China has not agreed to participate in the arbitration at all, so these have no legal effect at all. Of course, China does not need to recognize it.
CN doing copycat of PH style vs CN while it sits in PH eez w military bases
What’s the purpose of having alliance with the US if they can’t help us? Truly Philippines can’t stand with china in defending the west PH sea, so sad to admit but we need the US to settle down this issue.
😮😮😮dapat ng mag file ng panibagong case sa UN...
Noong election si Justice Carpio ay kritiko ni BBM dahil estate tax, mga nakaw at kung anu pa in short ayaw nya sa Marcos. Bat ngayon hindi nya binabangit ang mga yun?
Expert 😂😂😂😂😂
This Carpio is a monotonous and annoying to listen.
Tumahimik carport girl