Film Criticism Should Not Be Negative
Вставка
- Опубліковано 18 чер 2024
- A critical analysis of film critics and the criticism they receive.
0:00 Intro
2:10 What is Criticism?
6:20 Plinkett Ruined Everything
11:27 The Algorithm (and Negativity Bias)
16:03 Are Movies Getting Worse? (and Recency Effect)
22:31 The Point (Finally)
#filmcritics #videoessay #meeptop
description tags: Mr. Plinkett, RedLetterMedia, Mike Stoklasa, YMS, Your Movie Sucks, Chris Stuckmann, Jeremy Jahns, Lindsay Ellis, I Hate Everything, Roger Ebert, Star Wars, Marvel, Rings of Power, Black Adam, awful, sucks, terrible, trash, garbage, bad - Фільми й анімація
My favorite type of film criticism is "this movie is trash but it's my trash." Some critics dont even feel like they enjoy watching movies.
They do enjoy watching movies, they are just critical.
YMS does that a lot with people like Neil Breen
That sounds alot like how I intend to do criticisms when I get to it on my channel, criticizing both positively and negatively things that I grew up with and/or really like, such as how to Train Your Dragon, Star Wars the Clone Wars, Halo, Minecraft, Lego Worlds, Ninjago, Lockwood and Co., Call of Duty and Agents of Shield.
It's like telling a doc that you need to enjoy surgery
Brutalmoose will complain about bad movies but he has fun watching them for that reason.
Negative criticism is fine as long as it is coherent and actually makes sense
That goes for positive critiques as well.
It needs some balance as well.
Most of them are no sense
Nah, most of the time it's just bitter internet psuedo intellectuals trying to prove their smarter than the writer.
it's helpful when the claim of 'its trash' can be corroborated with articulated thoughts and comments about the filmmaking craft in the work. That's what we're looking for generally from film criticism. However there is a crowd that just wants to hear someone say bad things about movies they don't like and maybe say the word 'woke' every 3rd word. it seems to be a trend, that's not film criticism that's just muckraking sensationalism.
True. That's why I'm more interested in vid essays talking about themes rather than clickbait 'WOKE and TRASH!' nonsense
Honestly, the word "woke" has been so overused it practically has no meaning anymore.
@@TeresaKinsley Same thing happened with the word ‘cuck’ a few years ago. It had a meaning, started getting used more loosely and now it’s just a generalised insult people use.
I mean I know you're not directly saying this but It seems like you're saying their are only 2 types of reviews, ones discussing themes versus clickbait WOKE reviews. I have enjoyed videos discussing the themes and proposing theories but sometimes I want an analysis of lore/consistency or a video duscussing the cinematogrophy and guess what? All of these can be negative reviews. The Themes can be contradictory, The lore can be violated, The plot nonsensical, The cinematogrophy poorly designed or inaccurate. And then you have a negative review.
I am more interesting in talking about what constructs the themes rather than the themes themselves. It’s the effort and the execution that matter.
I try to stay away from that but it keeps reeling me in like a fish vs a worm on a hook
There are definitely various critics out there who are just far too cynical and uptight for my tastes.
It's not just youtube film critics. When Anthony Fantano puts out his yearly lists, the worst albums and songs lists get more views than the lists for the best ones
That's not true this year
“Water is like liquid elevator music.”
-Bilbo Baggins
People have a right to critique something anyway they see fit,given it's all subjective and opinion driven.
If I see something that's utter garbage I'm going to point out why I feel it's utter garbage
It's bad since it draws more eyes on bad things and fewer eyes on good things, so that's why we get more bad films.
@@Siegfried5846
I disagree. Pointing out mistakes in a film helps producers figure out where they went wrong and helps them to grow in their work
Calling everything wonderful keeps the trash coming
@@lindaeasley5606 No, it would be good if bad films weren't spoken about at all. Fans of Chris Stuckmann and Jeremy Jahns go to see those films to be armchair critics.
Sure are, but some people suck ass at criticizing or addressing their grivences, the "way you see fit" has many implications that you're doing it very sloppily.
Do you need a license to be a critic?@@Siegfried5846
This video is very relatable. I have actually noticed that when talking to people on social media, people usually never respond to positivity, but ALWAYS respond to negativity. Almost feels like they're trying to say that being negative is correct and positive is wrong, which I find depressing.
It’s emotional contagion. People are more likely to be receptive to negativity on social media and carry it forth - this is substantiated by studies.
It can also go the other way too, when people are overly positive about a mediocre movie with lots of problems.
I think this is true in most parts of life. Like, if someone has a perfectly fine experience at the grocery store, they carry on about their day. If what they wanted was out, an employee was brash, or the lines were a little long, they're going to complain to friends and family it was awful later despite the fact that everything else went right.
The positive aspects of something are often just bundled with the negative. We risk losing those good aspects if we don't make the effort to be attentive and aware or defining them
You're more invested in negativity to push for change.
If you're unsatisfied with a system, you actively oppose it. It's a lot more common to have rallies of protest rather rallies of support.
Pride isn't mainly a celebration. It's a protest foremost.
@@danielplainview2584 I feel like these studies regarding the internet are largely lacking context.
Without at least a little bit of negativity, it would be really hard if not impossible to make constructive criticism; if we were to be just positive about everything, we'd let a lot of lesser or bigger problems slide and eventually people would just stop caring about quality of filmmaking... Resulting in a sea of movies resembling a tasteless, mushy, colorful blob, full of everything and nothing at the same time.
Furthermore, negative critique doesn't have to be motivated by negative intentions. Many, if not most people, negatively criticise media because they care about them and want them to be improved, not destroyed.
The more attention I pay to this video, the more nonsensical it becomes... Not only does it barely address the topic it's supposed to explore, but when it does, it's on the most surface level possible and with no nuance to speak of.
The creator wanted to talk about one subject but in the end spoke about something completely different and I can't decide if this was done on purpose or by accident as a result of incompetence.
If you pay at least a little bit of attention, you'll see how hypocritical and contradictory the premise and execution of this video is. Some could even say that it's "toxic" and damaging to the very concept of critique.
Simply because you've made a disclaimer that this is "just your opinion" and acknowledged your hypocrisy in a way, doesn't mean that this is no longer a very poor attempt at exploration of the subject.
It goes far beyond just film-making and entertainment media. Can you imagine a world in which you are always fine however you presently are- nevermind the potential for you to be any kind of shitty person or even criminal monster? We would see terrible, self-destructive lifestyles and even lifestyles that actively harm other people be promoted as being okay, acceptable and even praise-worthy. There would be no growth, no improvement, nothing to strive for, no goal to achieve.
Apathy is death. All things come to an end, but not like this. Not me. I'll keep being negative where I need to be, if only to use that as a means to improve myself and whatever is around me.
@@eyesfullofsky9776 I guess the creator just didn't realise how deep this topic really is and couldn't come up with good argumentation to back up his misguided position.
Before I begin my actual comment, I would like to apologize in advance for my inadequate level of English proficiency. I am not a native speaker of the world's current lingua franca which unfortunately leads to me making numerous embarrassing mistakes being made whenever I attempt to communicate using this language. Whenever I am reminded of how I lack the ability to convey my thoughts in an eloquent manner, I feel as though I have committed a cardinal sin, as though every English teacher in the world is simultaneously shaking their head and sighing due to how utterly disappointed they are at me.
Although I know that saying sorry to those of you who are reading my comment will not change the fact that I fail miserably to write and speak perfect English, I am writing this as a way to deter a certain type of people who cannot stand poor English (Also known informally as Grammar Nazis) from mocking me by posting unwanted and unnecessary comments detailing my every blunder. In my humble opinion, making grammatical errors should be perfectly acceptable as native speakers should not expect non-native speakers to be able to communicate in their second or third languages eloquently. If you are able to completely understand what the other person wrote, is there really a problem with what they've written? No, because the entire concept of communication is the exchange of information between other intelligent beings, which means that no matter how the exchange of information is made, as long as the information is accurately shared there is not a fundamental issue with their ability to communicate. To see it in another way, remember that someone who isn't fluent in English is fluent in another language. When you think about it this way, isn't it impressive for someone to speak a second language in any capacity? Having empathy and respect are qualities that are sorely missing for far too many people these days, especially on the internet.
That being said, I am aware that not all netizens who correct others are doing it to ridicule and shame. There are some who do so with the intent to help others improve and grow. However, displaying the failures of other people publicly will cause the person who is criticized to feel negative emotions such as shame and sadness due to the fact that their mistake has been made obvious which severely undermines the point they were trying to make in spite of their unfamiliarity with the English language. In most circumstances people are not looking for language help when they post anything online. Most people just want to enjoy themselves and have a good time on the internet which is why I would not encourage correcting other people regardless of your intentions. If you really do want to help others with their spelling or grammar, I would highly recommend you to help via messaging privately because not only will you not embarrass anyone, you can also go more in-depth with your explanation which I'm sure the other person will greatly appreciate if they want help, but I digress. I know that I've written a bit of an essay, but I hope I've made my points clear.
Anyways, here is the comment I wanted to make:
shid And coom,
i dont think the creator ever said that we shouldn't criticize, just that a lot of it tended to be skewed heavily towards negativity when critizism should and can encapsulate so much more, and that the way we engage with media is stilted becuase of this. There is as much value in analyzing why a scene works as there is in analyzing why a scene doesn't.
@@lucyandecember2843 But he ignorantly assumes that negative criticism comes from bad intentions and brushes it off as worthless and damaging. I have no idea how he came to that conclusion; vast majority of people expresses negative criticism because they care for something and they see it as the only way to have their voices heard and have a positive impact in the end.
Sometimes giving someone a slap on the wrist is not enough and a slap straight in the face is what's really needed.
Delicate, "positive" criticism won't always work, in fact it will probably rarely work, especially when it comes to big companies.
This is like watching a internal existential crisis and I appreciate it.
Let's hope he'll be able to come to his senses one day...
I feel like the main thing to take from this video is that there's constructive criticism and destructive criticism. Use your words to help the field improve, not just tear it down. That includes naming what works and what doesn't✌️
What's the point of constructive criticism if the studios making the movie doesn't listen to anyone ?
Although you are right in pointing out some studios will release anything that will gain them quick buck, I still think making viewers expectations and understanding higher of film industry as a whole can lead to studios having to elevate their craft to meet them. (humongus copium but hey✌️)
Anyone can say film bad, but I enjoy videos that inspire me to create better stuff as well. If anything those videos can actually give you something valuable, unlike the films they often discuss.
@@boogerbeans Sometimes do they listen. They sure as hell listened with the Sonic design.
@@theflickster just that one time?
That is actually one of the points that make Ryan George's Pitch Meetings so entertaining for me. He points out actual plot holes or writing choices that don't make too much sense even in films I actually really like, and he does it in a humorous manner that feels more like a comedic roast than actual insult.
Things should always be criticized because that’s how things get better. That’s my opinion.
Not just your opinion, it's fact.
Amen.
Nutin but faxx
If said things need improvement, sure. But so much great stuff still gets criticized when it doesn’t need to be. I feel like no one can enjoy anything anymore because there’s no much constant negativity.
Pretty gay not gonna lie
A sad truth is that negativity is the backbone of interesting conversation. But it doesn’t have to be! In fact, some of my favorite video essays are about hope and positivity. We, as a team effort, could change the field of UA-cam Criticism forever
You and his video have not said a single reason why negativity is bad
@@EpicDiscovery truth be told, I wrote this comment a while ago and I don’t entirely know what I’m referring to here. I think I was talking about how lots of movie reviews nowadays are just “movie bad and here’s a 15 minute long video telling you why.” Movies the critics deem as mediocre are even worse because, either for comedic intent or their snobby arthouse persona, they’ll say something along the lines of “this was definitely a movie” and “this movie made me feel nothing. There is nothing here” I used to like 24 Frames of Nick but he fell into the same critic trap with the Mario Movie and he and a lot of others made the very (in my opinion) flimsy claim that a movie HAS to have a story to be interesting and that this was what he called an “ad movie.” It’s true that the Mario Movie’s story is pretty underdeveloped and it’s true that it’s mostly references, but I thought that the references were hidden very tastefully and not in your face. There were the obvious ones that an average mario fan would get and then there are the ones for the die-hard fans of nintendo. So, yes, while I should probably refrain from making the blanket statement that “positivity good, negativity bad”, I do stick by my point that negativity can be annoying and sometimes it can even alienate people from your channel. Positivity should definitely be used in these videos in my opinion, whether it be in the form of suggestions of what the movie could have done better or just having a calmer demeanor rather than “THIS MOVIE SUCKS” y’know?
@@EpicDiscovery I implied it and I think something in the video implied it as well, although I’m not entirely sure on that cos I don’t remember
@@zogwort1522 It could be. If you balance it correctly. I didn’t, as this was a blanket statement, so allow me to rephrase:
Film criticism should not be ENTIRELY negative. If someone has problems with a movie they can definitely express those. If their problems take up the majority of the movie, they should still try to find some kind of silver lining, just to be fair to it. It’s yin and yang, you need balance for a good critique. Maybe this is my personal taste, but I feel nitpicks should be their own section of the video seeing as they aren’t major and don’t contribute a lot the film being bad. They aren’t really valid “critiques” if you catch my drift.
@@zogwort1522 fair enough, but they should at least try to find one. If they can’t that’s okay, it’s probably a really horrible movie. Those would be the bottom of the barrel “January movies.” I think the biggest problem is that a lot of them are just pretentious. Google defines that word as and with those movies they deem “mediorce” they give such unnecessary nihilistic commentary about them. “This movie made me feel empty” “there is nothing to this movie” “this movie is soulless” etc. They do this for either comedic effect or because they want to sound superior and at first it’s kind of funny but my god does it get annoying quick. Movies are entertainment! They’re inconsequential to your life! They don’t need this. It’d be different if the film was blatant or disguised propaganda but it almost never is so the world wouldn’t be affected in any profoundly negative way
“I'd rather be handicapped than a communist.”
-Bilbo Baggins
The YMS Lion King video does have catharsis, but there’s a lot in there about filmmaking. The original Lion King had care and craft, Adam addressed the beauty of the original. He also showed how the elements of the remake removed the quality from the original. I appreciate the original film more because of him.
You say “Is this all criticism is?” in relation to that video, and I say “If so, we’re lucky”
I don't think that he actually watched it.
YMS of the bestiality fame?
I don't disagree that there is lots of negative reviews but there's also tons of overly positive reviews and a plethora of channels that never give criticism because they are scared of their audience getting mad at them. Toxic positive is real and just as bad.
*I love when meeptop said "It's criticizin' time!" and criticized all over the UA-cam reviewers. Truly one of the criticisms of all time.*
_"Truly one of the critics of all time"_
*-Jack Saint*
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ _6/5_
*_"One of the videos of all time."_*
well said
This video really makes you FEEL like meeptop.
criticized all over the place!
The ironic thing about this video is that it'll probably get picked up by the UA-cam algorithm because of the reasons you listed in it. This video is, for the most part, negatively talking about the negativity in most video essays on UA-cam.
I see a lot of UA-camrs who straight up refuse to criticize anything. The worst movies ever made these people will never say one bad thing about. I see way more videos like that than I do on people being negative
@@TheFAE_Plush angry Joe.
@@TheFAE_Plushhe got ya there, Angry Joe is a pretty accurate one.
@@TheFAE_Plush Even considering for a second that it’s impossible for a creator to shill anything they consume is how shallow, uninformed videos like this are made.
@@WL1264 What? I just watched his new Indiana Jones review and he clearly didn't like it. Actually you can see a lot of his reviews of films and games with a text "Angry Review" on a thumbnail and that's how you know this is negative review.
That sounds like a shallow, ignorant and childish habit.
The point that we look back on previous eras of filmmaking and only look at the best and most significant films of said eras really resonated with me. There have always been bad, filler movies with nothing to say and no reason to talk about, but the thing is, they do fade with time. Even though it certainly does feel like Hollywood only makes good movies by mistake now, in 10, 20, 30 years, nobody will remember the fluff and garbage like Jurassic World Dominion and Rise of Skywalker outside of occasionally one off conversations that'll mostly boil down to "hey that movie existed." Whereas the good movies that really meant something to people. I imagine a film like Top Gun: Maverick will still have people talking about it well into the future just like the original one did. There will always be bad movies, but there will also always be good movies. We just need to remember that fact, and I think we will all be a lot more satisfied and content with the world of entertainment, even if it does seem hopeless at times.
Yea I hate how the word “modern” is now attributed to mean “bad”, you know “modern movies suck” and all that.
You think people will forget TROS, or TLJ, or the Jurassic World trilogy, or Sark Fate, or any of these other movies that have taken beloved, classic properties and run them into the ground with terrible sequels? They should never be forgotten, they should (and will) forever stand as a testament to hubris.
If a response to something is "It sucks" and then proceed to argue with strangers who enjoy said thing , that person is the issue not the movie or the people who enjoy the film
Title: Film Criticism Should Not Be Negative
Thumbnail: several respected film critics with the word TRASH all over them
He NEEDS money bro how else are the bisexual lights gonna be paid for???
Fandom - mindlessly loving something
Hatedom - mindlessly hating something
Criticism - mindfully examining something
The critic's opinion will obviously affect their work, but their work isn't about their opinion, their work is about the art.
You watch a critic to get their opinion, that’s the point.
Who's "their"?
What about the one where we just like stuff casually?
Try telling that to the retards that hate Netflix Resident Evil
Even then, fandom is not the same as mindlessly accepting everything you're given. You can be a fan of certain aspects of a work or certain works in a series without being barred from criticising the ones you think are flawed.
One of the things I've found the most frustrating is that over the past few years, as the cynicism and negativity have taken over the discourse, people in general have begun to actively hate conversation and nuance, and just want to be patronized. I’ve written comments on movie-related posts on YT/FB/other platforms that were just a few sentences… maybe a few short paragraphs at most. Something that would realistically take less than 60 seconds to read and understand, and took maybe 5 minutes out of my day (typically while I'm sitting on the toilet or having my morning coffee) to write.
But rather than engage, people will just mindlessly dismiss them with sarcastic comments like _“Ugh, some loser doesn’t have a job, I guess”_ or _“Wow, good luck with that novel, nerd, hahaha”_ because I dared write something beyond the circle-jerk of single-sentence _“OMG, [MOVIE] SUCKS, LOL!”_ comments like everyone else. And this even happens in social-media groups I'm in specifically devoted to discussing movies, which blows my mind.
And it's more depressing than annoying to read those comments, because it's telling me that people aren't engaging with cinema as art anymore, and that too many people just have nothing of value to add to the conversation, and just want to mindlessly tear down something. And that's unfortunately emblematic of a great deal of modern discourse when it comes to art and film.
You must have dogshit taste
You’d see it less if you actively sought out content where people said “thing is good. Me like thing.”
have you ever considered thats because there is way more badly acted, shitty written tv shows and movies today ?
When more people get frustrated, maybe dont dismiss it ?
I think we've had somewhat different experiences, youtube channels that mailny focus on film analysis has a lot of intresting comment threads with people taking the artform seriously along withthe videos themselves being super intresting.
Off the top of my head i reccomend "hello future me", "Sage's rain" and "Savage books" they all make a variety og videos deconstructing characters and stories or giving advice on how to create good movies. I love all their channels. If you want indept discussions of film i higlhy recomend checking out ^^
@@lucyandecember2843 It's way easier to just assume that every critique video is cinema sins-tier garbage though.
FINALLY someone talked about this. Film "criticism" on internet is so frustrating. You go expecting to have a fun time sharing and discussing different views, but instead you get people trying to PROVE why something is a masterpiece or a complete garbage. It seems like there's no middle term.
That's why I've been trying to get more and more away from any conversation about movies that looks negative. I can't stand it anymore. Twitter banned me the other day for no reason and I got a little desperate. But now I see it was a blessing, because is one less thing getting on my nerves. Every time a new movie came out, there was always someone making polemic tweets about the script or the CGI to engage other people to hate on it too, as if script and CGI were the only things that could make a movie fun. It was that or the hallucinated fans hyping the fuck out of everything. And on UA-cam I just started blocking every channel the algorithm would recommend with this type of negativity content, because they mess real bad with my head and my expectations for new things.
I miss when I didn't use social medias. It was lonely not talking to anyone about new movies and TV shows, but at least I could watch them and make my own mind in piece. Now I almost feel guilty for loving The Rings Of Power, for instance, because some people just adore to hate that show on every opportunity they get, and I get really pissed every time I see them using words like "woke" as an argument.
Holy shit, I feel the EXACT same. I always thought I was alone with that ;-;
I feel the exact same. There's some movies out there that I've seen people overhype as the best thing ever or overhate as the worst film to exist and when I watch it to form my opinions on it, I think, "Well that was average. Not bad, not good, but kinda mid." And there's nothing inherently wrong about that either.
Yeah! Like, what does it even mean to be "woke"? What stupid kind of word is that?
Woke is rarely used in proper terms anymore
@@armyofuno8196 exactly
Completely agree! I think the best example of the yin-yang you described is RLM. They show that yes they can absolutely shit on some movies, but also show that they care about the art form by giving thoughtful reviews. ALSO, the most important point is that they have fun while doing so, which has sort of been left out of a lot of movie reviews in the past few years. Loved the video!
I love RLM, they tend to disagree with each other on films which is fantastic
They always have fun. Except when they review Star Trek Picard.
Yeah RLM compared to something like mauLer or Critical Drinker is a big difference to me. RLM always feel like they're having fun, goofing off, and generally treat their opinion as an opinion. A lot of these newer 4 hour essayists seem cynical and depressed to be talking about this stuff and treat movies like a weird math equation where there's a right and wrong answer to whether a movie is good.
@@Tribrachidiumheraldicum Which is interesting considering that I think MauLer and the Drinker were very influenced by RLM and the Plinkett reviews, but they're pretty lackluster compared to them.
@@Tribrachidiumheraldicum Have you seen any of Maulers critiques? He praises even tfa in the moments it shines. Also, he has a series of unbridled praises. Same with the Drinker, he has a series of the Drinker recommends, where he recommends good movies.
Lets not forget that rlm is one of the most negative bunch. Even if they didnt start the George Lucas r*ped my childhood, they still contributed to it massively.
i think a lot of this new market for trashing movies is that hollywood has been shitting out trash for decades now its more enjoyable to watch the byproduct of new critics analyzing and deconstructing what theyre feeding us
I might agree the critic department has also been oversaturated but honestly I can't place blame on that because this might just be a chicken and the egg scenario
I do think that the issue is a bit more rooted in the alt-right propaganda machine that is part of the Internet cycle.
I do think that’s part of the reason. I also think another part of the reason is much simpler. Humans just love drama and negativity
@@drstrangelove307 That's a stretch but I understand the intent. As much as I am inclined to agree even if there is a fire there's also people who didn't care about tossing leaves on that fire further fueling the issue.
Is the alt right going to look for every excuse to be mad? Yes but that doesn't mean the carelessness of handling the issues and the damages from that all while not caring about feeding them more fuel isn't an issue. Would they probably have looked for non issues even without that fuel? Yes but the issue is they wouldn't have converted as many people and got as far as they did had they not been mad to feel righteous in their holy war.
Personally I've seen terrible reviews from both political sides so I can't see it. Sure the right is a bigger part of that but they happen to be the side that keeps being given bad shows and movies that further enforce their mindset of victimhood they are seeking.
The answer believe it or not is to just send these messages better and that would have incredible effects. Maybe it wouldn't fix the problem; but thats an unrealistic desire. It (these political messages or themes) is too often in media given little time to explore and often contradicting the material around it. Some part of the blame inevitably lays with the people who keep doing this.
@@drstrangelove307 go touch grass, wow that was a fucking atrociously bad take you just spewed
Honestly I’m just not one for negativity, because so much of it exists nowadays I just choose to stay away from it, because most of the negative reviews feel the same, great analogy video talking about it in a positive manner.
Nobody forced you to watch bottom-tier media reviews. You’re never going to find anything you enjoy if you don’t put the effort into typing into a search bar.
Could you imagine if everyone started posting videos about how the room is actually a triumph
I literally saw someone say that there's no scientific way to prove that The Godfather is better than The Room. No, I'm not kidding.
@@jeremyusreevu237 holy shit lmao people are hilarious
Describing the algorithm as an entity that “attempts at every moment to negate the user’s impulse control” is so accurate 😂
Dont you think this is something that goes in both directions?
There are loads of channels that will slap a "10/10", "PERFECT" or "MASTERPIECE" with big red arrows and pikachu face thumbnails on damn near every review that they do. Channels that like twice a month publish a "THIS MOVIE CHANGED MY LIFE".
For every cinema sins on youtube there is a cinema wins and some of them are even good at their job
I get so tired of seeing "masterpiece" thrown around carelessly. That is a very strong word. There are movies I like, movies I think are better than the ones being called masterpieces, that I wouldn't necessarily call masterpieces.
No because positive criticism is nice and nice things are good. ☺
That algorithim is really the biggest problem for this whole thing, I know channels that should be much bigger that are mostly positive people but are'nt because they prefer not to get into rants and be overly negative. UA-cam rewards people who go overboard with it and it is real irritating. Combined with the anxiety of if you don't make a video consistently fast then you risk losing all your hard work and you have an algrathom that can be very hard to please.
If you go back and watch all the old Siskel and Ebert reviews here on YT, you'll see just how much of the good and bad things we say about movies coming out today were true of movies coming out in the 70s, 80s, and 90s.
Idk. I guess I don't see the issue. How are you supposed to have a well defined understanding of quality if you don't have something to contrast it to? Tearing something apart is valuable because it allows you to look at the guts and mechanics. Movies are very complex things that require thousands of elements to work in cohesion. Perhaps some channels are too gleefy or vitriolic in their disparagement of media; however, film has always had its fair share of cynical cash grabs that aren't really deserving of the soft gloves with which you'd handle an art students final peice.
I love the fact that you used the classic disclaimer "It's just my opinion." in case you'd say something baffling and people would get angry about it.
Even if it's just your opinion, it can still be wrong; it can also be criticised.
Subjectivity isn't a shield.
Consciousness of that negativity hits even harder when you actually start to work on film projects and see all the hard work that creators have to put even on the shittiest movie.
It becomes important to have critical voices. A lot of care goes into filmmaking, and criticism can be useful. Pointing out shortcomings in films can be for the love of film. These flaws prevented said film from being its best. Filmmakers can be wary of hurdles and resolve them, making their art better. Unfortunately that’s not all criticism.
If you aren’t pushed to do better as a result of that criticism, you shouldn’t work in the industry.
o.o
@@kyrroti9921doesn't most things have flaws I think few things are perfect
@@nineinchthread
Theres a difference between a not amazing, but pretty good steak and a half raw, rotten piece of meat cooked in rancid butter.
I definitely start out by watching and seeking out critiques of media I love, so you’re on the money with it being about validating and recognising art. However that same path lead me down a loophole of schadenfreude where I see the videos on notoriously bad shows and enjoy seeing what makes them as bad as they are.
Unfortunately the lines are getting blurred more and more these days, sometimes even on purpose. Fantastic video as always, Meep!
As someone who's seen one too many HiTop thumbnails of him malding over the newest reboot of Spider-man not being Raimi or Webb esque, I really needed this video.
Love your take on the recency bias, and feel that is very true about music. Every time I hear someone say that ‘Rap isn’t what it used to be’ I wonder if they forgot about acts like 2 Live Crew or Vanilla Ice
Vanilla Ice was criticised and attacked often for not being a proper rapper! He even had his royalties stolen off him!!!
So do you really know that much yaself!
@@crizzhutch1066 Yes Crizz, and that Death Row records sent a guy over who held him off of a balcony for more $$. I think the point you are missing here is that people who find that to be the Golden Age of Rap music conveniently forget the sub par artists of the time, while also overlooking the better artists of today in favor of the Vanilla Ice equivalents of 2022
@@eliasconnolly1973 I would say that those were the golden days, as with so much of the entertainment industry!!!
These days, everything is produced too fast, so there is little thought or care put into it. Just get it out get the money in and on to the next one! As so much is just treated as the product!
How many silly rappers, keep attacking Eminem, yet none have the rhyming ability of him!
Not everything was better back in the 90's but the quality was higher and so were peoples standards!
You can name two terrible acts, but ignore the majoirty of rap at the time which was very good.
Today it's quite literally the opposite. There is far more trash than there is good especially in rap.
@@TallicaMan1986 I can also name the Tag Team or Kid Rock or Too $hort or even Puff if you want me to keep going. The point I am making is that 20 Years from now I can point to artists like J. Cole, Denzel Curry, and Kendrick when making the same argument, and forget about Lil Pump or the Island Boys. That is the same point this video makes about recency bias and why I found it interesting
Great video! I really enjoyed it! I've definitely shared in your thoughts whenever consuming some of these reviews. (or even when making some of my own)
I absolutely _love_ negative reviews where much of the ire is directed at the directors/writers saying the stupidest things in interviews with a shit-eating grin on their face, as if they know what they're doing. Gotta be one of my favourite genders.
But seriously, that's what I think makes a lot of this content. You don't see many people going after experimental directors whose new ideas don't land, or humble writers who are just doing their best and will address criticism in an agreeable manner. I think most of us will have a ton of respect for people like that, even if we don't like their work. Having someone wealthy with a nice punchable face who makes the most milquetoast shit imaginable, won't listen to reason and comes up with excuse after excuse for us to dog-pile onto is just... *chef's kiss*
Being short is a disability, and as a tall person, it's your responsibility to make sure short people don't get even more disabled by having to look up to speak to you. Doing this can damage their neck. Standing up while talking to short people also makes them feel threatened and unsafe so kneeling down not only prevents them from damaging their necks but also makes them feel more safe. Not doing this means you don't respect short people, you're mocking their disability, you're looking down on them and that's ableist, so be the bigger man and kneel.
Thank you.
this video really got to you huh why are you commenting for like 6 months straight
I mean, most content is replacement level, and if you want people to pay extra for said content (ie go to a theater instead of just watching something streaming), then yeah, most stuff does not meet that standard and there is nothing wrong with pointing it out. Also, praise only has value based on how hard it is to attain (this particularly frustrated me in The Menu, if the critic never gives bad reviews, then her voice never would have had a chance to launch anyone’s career).
That’s why film criticism is better in podcast form. Video Archives with Quentin Tarantino or Cinema of Meaning with Thomas Flight are my main go tos for film discussion. The algorithm doesn’t push negativity and most of the time they’re just talking about movies they really adore and recommend.
Good, thoughtful video. I appreciate in particular your nuanced take on the Plinkett videos, which often catch strays as being the nadir of bad UA-cam film criticism but are actually very articulate and detailed works of criticism, even with their flaws.
Though I want to throw a quick shoutout to Shampoo, which is actually a beloved movie in cinephile circles and Hal Ashby something of an unsung hero of 70s Hollywood (or at least lesser sung). Your point about recency bias in that section still absolutely stands.
I love love love the "highlight reel" analogy. I've thought this exact thing for a long time
This was really well done, and I agree with it. It would be nice to see a super positive review of a movie get the same kind of viewership as one of the many Rise of Skywalker videos.
It’s the same reason the news is like 95% negative information and then they end the show with a 20 second little news story about puppies. You’re engaged because of the negativity, but then they give you a small positive thing to keep you coming back to watch the next day.
Right on, Meetop. This video is perfect. That's why I spend my channel defending movies that I love but other people have decided suck. I absolutely love film channels that tear apart and make fun of bad movies, but I also think that certain channels take it way too far, which is why I stopped watching Mr. Enter. Overall, it's good to be negative, because we need people to be called out for bad filmmaking, and we don't want film discussion to be a positive criclejerk, but we don't want to get too negative.
You've got a point. As much as I love YMS, sometimes his opinions get a lot of hate, either because they're wrong or different or maybe both. We all have a right to different opinions, as long as we don't confront each other. We can educate each other without arguing or fighting which opinion is right or wrong. If someone's opinion happens to be wrong or stupid (as in uninformed or lacking valid reasoning), we can maturely educate that person to research and not make up stuff to form their opinion. Depends on the person, obviously. Also, happy to see you here, Jeremy.
Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm...
I do find it weird Chris Stuckmann is included in the thumnail as he stopped rating and even critizing movies
Same with Jeremy Jahns. Those two are easily way more level headed and constructive than basically 90-95% of all movie essayists and critics on UA-cam right now. Stuckmann even openly admitted he doesn't have as much fun ripping into movies anymore because he wanted a break from having to watch something he dislikes for internet views
@@icedcapplord710 as a diehard star wars fan Jeremy Jahns gets my respect for his "Sorry George Lucas" video
He admitted he had a share in all the hate George Lucas got to the point Lucas gave up and sold Star wars to Disney
Of course Chris and Red letter media stopped because it's not profitable anymore to shit on the star wars prequels because many GOOD videos on the prequels called out their hypocrisy and the prequel fans grew up and rightfully defended Lucas and his craft
I'm confused. Stuckmann does critique movies. It is his whole channel.
@@CDLatin He rarely is critical anymore, he mostly reviews movies he likes nowadays and at most he'll give one or 2 constructive criticisms.
@@jaeblack4752... so he still critiques movies... if you watch a movie and only talk about what works in the movies favor it is still a movie/ review or critique.
I really enjoyed your input on critics today. I enjoy your style of youtube videos and how you explain and articulate your points.
I turn off "reviews" as soon as I sense they're just being "cool and edgy and quirky" and just trash the films and shows instead of providing constructive criticism.
"This is trash" is not critiquing. "This is trash because this this and this and it would have been a lot better if they did this this and that" THAT'S critiquing.
I’m glad you actually curate your own content unlike a majority of people here who claim that this is the only type of negative content that exists and reject the genre entirely.
The state of the film critique genre of videos is so dire right now that I gain more enjoyment from reaction videos.
You did the YMS lion king review a great disservice.
Literally. Half the video is dedicated to how amazing the original is. Yms is not a mindless hater.
1. How dare you reduce YMS's Lion King live action review to "is this all there is?". He literally spent half the video saying how the original is better, as a lens for why the "live action" failed. Funny how there's a space for both.
You're literally saying he's doing criticism wrong. How about you do your own thing and let these people who are successful because their work resonates do the same, and see how that works out for you?
2. Toxic positivity makes bank on this platform too, and it can be just as annoying.
P.S. Chris Stuckmann is literally trying to be a director, so if he keeps doing negativity, other directors and agents in the industry won't like him, and reputation is everything in showbiz. He's not "cleansing" criticism, it's a business/career decision.
YMS gives good criticism, it's his presentation that I personally dislike, he acts like a jerk then defends himself for acting like a jerk. He tried explaining why him calling things "for babies" isn't insulting and why people shouldn't take it as an insult and his defense was "if someone called something i liked for babies i wouldn't be offended" which I don't think I need to explain why that is a childish response that lacks understanding of the idea that others people feel differently than you. The guy just rubs me the wrong way.
@@LegacyOfGi The idea that nuance means an even balance of positive and negative is blatantly naive. Not everything is half good, half bad as you imply. There's not really a balance to be had when a thing has more good aspects than bad, or vice versa. I might even go so far to say that a balance is nearly impossible, otherwise why evaluate anything, why praise or criticize if we can boil it down to a balance?
Also no, it's a core example of his, and I'm simply pointing out why his example is bad at best, and disingenuous at worst.
"Is this all there is?" Give me one "negative" channel, and I'll show you 500 corpo shills sucking Hollywood off, paid or for free. Games and film journalism is nearly all advertising anyway, so it takes balls to be an honest critic.
Finally, the idea that I worship negativity is stupid. Where the hell did you get that? A lot of the people I watch have more to say than "thing good, thing bad, here's the percentage". Actual nuance is accepting that everything we consider good may have bad aspects and vice versa. I respect the opinion better when a person can give me a consistent take. Hell, I might not agree, but if you can articulate well, it's an pinion worth being out there.
The fact is that positivity is less risky to project, especially for films is that there's an economic incentive. Negativity ragebait clicks are PEANUTS compared to what studios (for films and games) are willing to offer for critics to suck their dicks. Again using Chris Stuckmann as an example, he is not critical anymore precisely because of the financial motivation. Fact is, if someone is being critical, there is less chance that they have the studios' dicks down their throats. Also, the more critical reviewers are also often the first to readily give praise if there is anything praiseworthy. Look at YMS. Anyone who's all praise WITHOUT ELABORATION just makes them more likely to be a shill for corpos.
tl;dr Miss me with that weakass, halfbaked, terrible fucking opinion.
I had never thought about magazine headlines being just like UA-cam thumbnails but you’re so right
loved your dahmer video not because it was negative but because it was dripping with care and nuance! I think the best 'negative' criticism comes from a place of true love and constructive criticism. don't get too caught up in the ouroboros of the 'worth' of what you're doing, you're smart and you have perspective and obviously you care deeply for nuance! the platform could definitely use more criticism like this and I hope you continue. sometimes you have to give the alg what it wants but also make it worth people's time, sometimes some nuanced perspective in a takedown video is like taking medicine with a spoonful of sugar lol. any cultural criticism that helps people with media literacy is a godsend in this our lords year 2022 even if you gotta stoop to some clickbait now and again.
o.o
I mean YMS' Lion King video came from a place of love for the original. It simultaneously explored what made that movie so good, while exploring the ways in which the remake just didn't do it justice.
"is this what film criticism is?" I'd fucking hope so.
Wow your literally the first person to point this out! I’ve literally been thinking about this topic for weeks now, it’s been driving me crazy, I actually used to watch lots of those types of videos and I can’t anymore, I just can’t.
My ability to enjoy criticism here on UA-cam, especially film criticism, is waning. Creators have left nuance at the bus stop and go to the extremes almost always because that’s what gets views. The art of criticism, the writing, the perception, the sharing of a subjective experience, is left out as a result. It’s sad.
We still have the written word thankfully. There are a lot of great writers out there who make a living from film criticism, people like Matt Zoller Seitz, Christy Lemire, Odie Henderson, and A.O. Scott. I dig these people and their work.
First time viewer here. I really dig this video and I appreciate that you made it. Big Ups!
The whole “every critic on this website is low-quality” argument is just a massive self-report for people who don’t bother to put any effort into curating the content they watch. I’m not going to blame a fast food restaurant when someone who goes there every day complains that they’re now in poor health when there’s a healthy alternative across the street.
Is that tattoo on your arm from The Witch? Watched the 4k disc of that recently (back to back with The Northman) and absolutely loved it.
Why shouldn't film criticism be negative? Why do you get to be the moral arbiter of what film criticism should be?
Why are you moral arbiter on who can do youtube videos on stuff hmm??
@@newrudo I'm not. He's allowed to make whatever kind of video he wants to make. I'm just criticizing him for making poor arguments and not even answering the question in the title of his own video.
@@newrudo Why didn’t you ask the guy who made this video the same question?
@@wolfiewoo3371 Poor arguments such as? He literally spells it out in the video, negatitve criticism is fine if it leads to actual improvement and discussion
Rather than pandering to a "lul ur movie is woke" human centipede of fishing for cheap clicks through rage bait.
Theres not a single second in the video (that you did not watch) where he claims anything that you are saying.
0:38 ugh i hate thumbnails like that,
A kind i dislike more are the ones that shove a speach bubble and some quotation marks as if the actor or character actually said whatever is in the thumbnail
If you cannot be negative, then you cannot be positive either. So you are clearly not capable be being a critic without having the full range of criticisms.
@@zogwort1522if you do nothing but give positive criticism, then you cannot properly review films because your opinion is worthless, because an honest review will point out the positive as well as the negative.
Did you even watch the video? He's not saying that film critics have to be positive. He's saying they have to be genuine, not overexaggerating their negative observations.
I really enjoyed this video, largely because it is something I've been wrestling with myself. As one of the former contributors to a site briefly mentioned in the video, I definitely made my name on negative reviews, even if I did try to mention things also worth praising if I found them.
But I also found myself naturally growing out of that format, at least on a regular basis, because I feel like that kind of thing can be poisonous. I have said things in those videos I'm not proud of or agree with now. But even in those negative reviews, I wanted them to be informative and useful; it is easier to understand how something works from a failure than something that does it well to the point of effortlessness.
However, I know a lot of my audience don't really like this change. I still put out negative reviews, but under a different banner and as part of a more traditional review show. And I know my views have gone down because I hate clickbait titles and sensationalism (I tend ignore videos with such), but I am a row boat struggling against the edge of a waterfall. I wish there was a place for my criticism here, but I increasingly fear there isn't.
Anyway, great video, first of yours I've seen, that I think articulated these feelings very well.
I just want to say I have noticed your changes and I appreciate them. I've watched your stuff for years, and I'm one of the people who doesn't want you to feel stuck doing the same shtick.
I wouldn't be too hash on yourself for your earlier stuff as that was the culture of the time. Even in the early videos you went into the 'behind the scenes' aspects and mentioned positive aspects unlike a lot of reviewers. I wish more people were like your reviews where you go into detail about your feelings rather than just look for views [like you I avoid the sensationalist stuff like the plague]. Keep doing what your doing as your fans appreciate it.
It seems like you followed this video’s main point of “negative criticism is bad, not to say that it is bad” pretty closely. What an abomination of critical thinking.
@@user-NameName No, I give plenty of pans. But I shouldn't do them all the time because it gets old, and it was making me miserable, feeling like all I was contributing was a toxic mindset.
@@FilmBrain That wasn’t the point of the video but okay then…
Ya know, I've been thinking of this for a while now. Especially the recency effect when I point out to people that there's just as much mixed quality as there is now. People only think that modern movies suck now since they've only seen the good stuff of the past without really thinking about it. I've been trying to make my videos overall positive about the things I enjoy or at least highlight things I like in something I don't.
There's also a trend I've noticed of really any positive reviews of anything being attacked as "shills". Your opinions are now put into little boxes of whether not they can be engaged with good faith or not.
It's funny that you mention Jurassic World Dominion since the extended cut was better in my opinion and it's a damn shame it wasn't released in theaters. You'd think the film killed the dog of every critic.
I dont watch a lot of video essays anymore, for a lot of the reasons listed in this video. But this video was awesome, it articulated what I have been feeling about film criticism and discourse and I loved how you ended the video. Thank you for this!
There a dope video essay channel contrary to "Cinamasins" called "Cinamawins." I am all for positivity to be brought back into spaces as well as nuanced critique!
@@edgytypebeat781 l love CinemaWins , and another good channel is Natalie Gold, she does reactions but she doesn't trash any movies she watches she'll either say "It's well made but it's not something I'm a fan of" it's refreshing
I'm in a similar situation. Around 2020~2021 I realized so many of the videos about movies I was consuming on here were negative in one way or another, and usually about things I didn't even care about most of the time. As more time passed it clicked that I simply wasn't enjoying them anymore, they were actively making me feel like crap and it was just too much negativity I didn't need in my life. So I stopped watching most of my regular channels in replacement for more things that were bringing me joy and being more selective about the videos and channels I watch.
The two comments above both mention great channels, and I wholeheartedly agree with them. Watching CinemaWins after watching a lot of CinemaSins years back was the exact type of thing I was looking for, and I can't sing their praises enough. After I started my UA-cam cleanse I also starting watching movies with my enjoyment in mind regardless of the general consensus online, and usually came away liking something way more than most. Finding a channel that actively goes out of it's way to shine a light on the positives in films that so many overlook, and not making anyone feel bad for enjoying something like so many others do was so refreshing to see. Reaction videos have been more of my cup of tea too because of the sheer amount of channels that have popped up recently and there's a lot more balance in the types of movies being reviewed imo. I've only seen a handful of Natalie Gold's vids, but her energy is infectious and I really need to watch more of her. Since everyone is giving suggestions I'll recommend The Movie Buds, they focus on more female lead movies and seeing stories that they aren't the target demographic for. They're really genuine, open minded, and no matter what make an effort to point out the bad a film may have without taking away from the things they liked and how they feel about it (wow this ended up being way longer than I meant for it to be lol)
What's that pleasant piano music you use in every video? Appears at 0:29
Read Oscar Wilde's The Critic as Artist. I agree that critique is an artform and if you aren't careful your negative critique can be flanderized into cynicism. I hope for a higher level of critiques and films in the future, and that can only happen when critics and artists can hold each other to a higher standard. For me a lot of the channels you listed are flawed in that their positive criticism is not treated with the same effort or depth as their negative critiques. Like you said part of it can be chalked down to negativity bias, but Id also like to think that if creators made their positive criticisms with as much thought and value maybe more people would be interested in them. Lastly, you aren't being a hypocrite by criticizing an artform you take part in; you just want to see criticism get better, and, in a lot of ways, it does need to be better right now in order to substantiate legitimate concerns about how companies are handling switching over to streaming. Being irresponsible in critique could lead to an industry oversaturated by bad movies, not just mediocre ones.
Negativity sells. Its that simple
Maybe I’m watching the wrong channels.. but I never see much people critiquing themes, Author intent Vs Critic Intent, the meaning of the movie, and the nuances that one can really dig into. That’s personally what I love to do after reading or watching something. I just really never get that from UA-cam
Honestly, I think there's something to this. If criticism has been flanderized in this way who's to say films won't from moving to streaming? It is stupidly hard to find good critics on youtube.
I highly recommend Implicitly Pretentious and Hello Future World in this regard. The former focuses more on comic book media but he is very in depth and invested in thematic storytelling and drawing from the finer nuances a lot of video essayists tend to overlook or ignore. His Spider-Man and Batman videos are especially incredible dissections
Lindsey Ellis and Dan Olson offer deep insights into movies. you should check them out
@@krustyknight2943 thank you very much! I'll do just that! Really appreciated!
@@icedcapplord710 thank you for those! Being a lifelong comic reader it should be perfect!
Hearing that Dead Rising jingle always takes me right back to the mall.
How can the plinkett reviews have aged poorly lol?
are YMS and Chris really the best examples?
Right? Yms is always explains why something doesnt work for him. He is not a mindless hater.
I have stopped watching overly negative views specifically because I’m trying to avoid things that make me angry. We are all on a rock floating in a fucking void like why does it matter that the new Star Wars sucks ass? I can simply not like things.I don’t need UA-camrs to tell me I’m right about my opinion.
Same here, mental health is more important then to be right, after i stoped following all this Negativ shitty channels, i actualy turned around and like Star Wars for what it is now.
This is about as unnuanced as the average movie criticism video. The fact that we're on a rock floating in a fucking void doesn't mean we have to be apathetic or nihilistic.
You can also simply not like things and not need UA-camrs to tell you you're right while deriving entertainment from their videos.
It's great that you're avoiding things that make you angry but that doesn't mean you have to pretend you live in a vacuum or project whatever you have going on onto the rest of the human race.
I found this channel from the Dahmer video. Looked through your back catalogue and subscribed. I thought your commentary had good nuance and depth.
Hope you can hit the sweet spot of appealing to algorithms while staying true to yourself. Another good video.
The problem is that most new content is produced by an industrial system therefore most is actually trash and not art.. perfectly accepavle to me in this era that most art is ravaged because most art that is consumed by the mainstream is producer and money fueled and ends up dumbed down
Does anyone mind telling me what song he uses at the very beginning?
Personally would retitle it as "absolutely negative" just so people understand it's the absolutist stance and emotions that are core to these criticism, but that is only mild criticism I have with this video, rest slaps.
But the ironic thing is, if you retitle the video like you said, the people who need to see it the most are less likely to click on it.
The Star Wars prequel hate is a perfect example of "hate click"
They literally parrot the same talking points and they get millions of views, they're not shy about it they hifive each other on the same tired "criticisms"
"Anakin was an immature teenager"(uh because that's what he was, a boy who was told to repress being a teen)
"Obi-Wan and QuiGon should of been the same character"
"Who cares about politics"(In a new hope the first hour of the film , is extremely political as is return of the Jedi , this is more of a "selective outrage" mindset they have)
"Anakin does evil things for no reason"(His mother was murdered by tusken raiders, his motivation of doing evil things was to keep loved ones from dying which was shown in all the prequel films )
And then the "prequel hating" fans parrot it and then argue with total strangers for years over a movie they didn't like
It's really sad how easily people can be manipulated into hating something
And in another comment section here I mentioned the John Kransiski's Reed Richards Photoshopped photos in alot of these big channels thumbnails, that's false advertisement, you'd think they're fans would be offended but nope they eat up and was mad he got killed off in Multiverse of madness
@@thepubknight6144 I mean... let's not pretend the prequels are good movies, even if the hate they get is over the top. But I don't think a lot of people need to be manipulated into not liking them.
@@DerMoerpler Lets not pretend like the majority of the criticism the prequels got is just flat out wrong.
The biggest problem here is that even the Rise of Skywalker has fans, you know, so even the movies you profoundly dislike (with valid criticism OR external bias) have an audience. The problem of a lot of criticism is that is about movies that are not for you, and for some people that's a personal afront. Is not that they want more movies they like, is that they feel other people SHOULDN'T have movies made for them, because it doesn't appeal to them so whenever a fad arises (and studio heads greenlight more of the same kind of project) they get unnecessarily livid.
it is one thing to make new kinda movies for new kinda fans. and it is a completely different thing to buy beloved IPs with established fanbase just hijack it for ur own and then bring back legacy characters only to tear down and deconstruct , insult and subvert them to dirt. in these case of course the fans are gonna be angry, cuz u just hijacked the IP and inserted your politically obsessed biases into the form of media that in is beyond recognition of the original doesnt even feel the same anymore. they dont have the balls or creativity to start new IP and attract fans with quality but just buy IPs and run it to the ground. they dont have the mind to create new original character and build them up apart from making them "better and stronger" than beloved established character and insult them
Star wars, Star trek , dr who, Rings of power , witcher, willow, Halo series etc are the best examples. the "negativity" surrounding these franchises are completely justified.
@@btchiaintkidding7837 congrats you misunderstood the point.
Once you realize that star wars does not belong to you; you will understand what's going on. It will outlive you. It will outlive your kids. You dont own it.
Why do I keep hearing the Willamette Parkview Mall music from Dead Rising in so many videos?
“Film criticism shouldn’t be negative”
Thumbnail: TRASH?!
- Saying it's just your opinion doesn't mean what you say shouldn't be criticized.
- Admitting to your hypocrisy doesn't make you less hypocritical, or change the fact that it's bad to be a hypocrite.
- A lot of bad movies have been made the last 5 years. They should be called out as bad movies.
Except a lot of movies in the past 5 years weren't that bad.
a lot of bad movies have been made in the last 10 years, a lot of bad movies have been made in the last 20 years, SURPRISE BAD MOVIES HAVE ALWAYS EXISTED!
@@technounionrepresentative4274
your comment needs as much likes as comments can get 👍.
Who cares? Watching harsh reviews of bad products is entertaining. If people treat overly negative reviews as serious analysis, that's their fault.
Why can’t serious reviews be overly negative? What if it is a terrible movie, shouldn’t it be overly negative?
By your logic, a serious analysis of an objectively bad product can’t exist.
The frame rate is so clean that my eyes are actually getting scared by how well I can track your hand talking. I'm impressed (if not a bit disoriented).
The negativity sphere is so hard that a couple years ago, when I made my first video, I said I hated Toy Story 3. Just because I thought it would make me different. I hadn’t seen the movie in years at that point, and I thought it would make my channel blow up.
It didn’t and now I just make videos I care about. I’m having more fun even if my videos aren’t being spread anywhere.
Just like meeptops first video, and look where he is now. Respect
This comaprision doesn’t make sense, do you think every person making negative critiques of movies are not doing what they care about? Like they are faking theur critiques like you did one time? It doesn’t add up
@@spinosaurusstriker i dont think that's what anyone was saying. but negativity does sell though, as the video explained, so it does get overblown, even if a lot of it is still passionate
@@daxtro5492 He quite literally said that in his comment. These people genuinely think that it’s impossible to be passionate about criticizing something and are instead just begrudgingly making negative content to make money. It’s a massive self-report.
@@daxtro5492 eccept he literally said that.
Without a doubt a lot of these UA-camrs should not be the face of modern film criticism. There's a case that can be made for allowing them their own corner of the internet, because there's nothing inherently wrong with that, but they are at the head of this subsection of YT
There's a 10m+ view video on a certain divisive blockbuster where the entire argument is based on wildly misunderstood dialogue and "This is different to the original, therefore it is bad" without analysing why that change may have been made. I found myself disagreeing with criticisms of a film I did not like.
@@MatthewBradleyComedy Exactly. The best criticisms are not front and center. That's the problem
Idk YMS is really great because he's constantly talking about and urging people to watch great foreign and underground films, and he has a great comprehension of concepts like the manipulation of films, presenting information in unique and thoughtful ways, etc.
@@etalex7074 But what does YMS stand for? (Rhetorical question, I know what it stands for)
Edit: For all others, the name thing has been explained to me
@@officialmonarchmusic I mean that name is really nothing more than a joke. I don’t see anything wrong with a more sardonic or cynical sense of humor.
There's playing the "youtube game" which is where thumbnails feel like they need to be forced to grab from this very point of view. Then there' negativity vs postivity and for me when I tackle or have a negative thing to point out I always attempt to say how it could be improved and for postive I try to explain why it's good. There's an understanding of subjective vs objective as well that ties into this process and lots of time for some let the subjective thing fuel their arugements.
Cynicism/sarcasm pushed sincerity waaaaay the fuck out of our society a couple of decades ago.
UA-cam, however you choose to marginalize it, is just a reflection of this.
I really do think your spot on with everything you said in this video. Ever since Cinemasins "Everything Wrong With" series became popular, it created this false idea that film criticism is mindlessly bashing things for entertainment value instead of looking at the big picture. From what I observed, Its ok if a review of something is completely negative as long as the reviewer/critic explores where the art work fails to both the artist and viewer, and give insight as to where an artist can improve.
However, if we really want a new golden age of cinema and to have good stuff consistently come out, then we need to stop giving shitty modern hollywood franchise films publicity. Even if its negative. All the popular reviewers who bash, say the Star Wars: Sequels or Masters of the Universe: Revelations has only promoted them more because they draw large attention to the product. If we want better films, we need to give more attention to the good stuff and show less interests in the bad. Anyway, great work!
Why are you under the impression that his style of criticism is the only type that exists on this platform?
o.o
So what do u do when u find everything wrong with a movie? So what if it’s negative
The cult of hate is very real and it’s always open for new members.
Awesome video by the way 😁
I don't even know what to say about this. I'm a young, aspiring filmmaker myself, one who often finds themself ruminating on subjects such as these; content, criticism, mass appeal. It's an element of any art form that has only become more prevalent with time.
It's not simply a matter of being negative like some people in the comments believe you're talking about, it's beyond that. It's a lack of love for art, turning it into content to be dissected, critiques to be echoed, cults to be built.
Criticism is fine, self-criticism is important above all else, to be proud of something you've created is a rare feeling above all else. This goes beyond the internet and UA-cam, it reaches into every facet of life. To appreciate art as feeling, emotion, not scientific or mathematical but like Jazz. There's strength in loving the construction, but more in falling in love with the feeling.
The greatest artists did not poke and prod other artwork, did not look at it from a lens of economical criticism, they simply created. They felt, and they made. They gave birth to that which they had love for.
Even the films which are said to be 'arthouse', that go against the grain, often still feel 'efficient' and 'constructed' in their result (in so far as they seem made of what worked before instead of entirely from the heart).
I hope people don't see this video as simply relating it to UA-cam, to Marvel or Disney. There's so much be dissected in this conversation, and it's so incredibly important.
Everybody in this section of UA-cam needs to see this video
I agree and the glad you made this. I had to stop watching the just negative reviews because they weren't informative or balanced or interesting to me anymore.
Back when i used to watch these sort of reviews, i remember i found negative criticism on moves i liked, and it was fun to watch because they would give me another perspective to a movie i enjoyed.
This is a video a lot of people should see.
To kind of quote "movies for content instead of movies for art", hits home so much for me. People need to take more mind into what is opinion for the sake of venting and instead of "validating Art".
Really well done video!! I found what you had to say incredibly thought provoking and accurate
Positive criticism is the solution to negative criticism's problems.
It's really awesome watching your channel grow so fast! Well deserved, man. I've been around since 7k. 100,000 is just around the corner
Hey, I know you’re not gonna see this but I appreciate the fact that you let go for a moment and expressed your feelings on why that would tempt you to choose monetary gain over passion projects. It’s not something you’d want to do but it pays bills and that’s a bummer to hear. I gave a like to this video just for this honesty and sincerity. I hope this channel gets more views and numbers for things that bring you passion.
This was a really great video. well constructed expertly delivered and a really good topic, that i like to discuss with me friends. but now i can just show them this video instead, cause you hit the nail on the head with this one!
Great video. I don’t really understand the perception that movies are getting worse; I think it could be argued that big budget action-adventure films are getting worse, but I don’t really give a shit if that is the case. There’s still so much good shit out there