In my view, an artist working in the medium commonly used by photographers. Not sure beyond that. I assume people buy her work. And commission it. All a mystery to me. I can't say any of it touches me to any degree. Those are my thoughts. She should continue doing what fires her creative vision. As I'm sure she will!
Nice title. 😂 Give me a break! Sounds like she’s got a real head on them shoulders. I mean, she tries to make “work that provokes thought,” people! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Excellent; empirical !!
Love it
Thanks! Interesting perspective! Thought provoking!
In my view, an artist working in the medium commonly used by photographers. Not sure beyond that. I assume people buy her work. And commission it. All a mystery to me. I can't say any of it touches me to any degree. Those are my thoughts. She should continue doing what fires her creative vision. As I'm sure she will!
I found her take on photography refreshing, she goes beyond shooting a pretty picture imo
Nice title. 😂 Give me a break! Sounds like she’s got a real head on them shoulders. I mean, she tries to make “work that provokes thought,” people! 👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Had the same idea here. It's just boring. Good photographers are everywhere and rarely need to "alter" their negatives to make them better.
@@DarkAngelEU good photographers have altered their negatives and other materials for over 100 years.
looks like government sponsored art
hoomalumalu what do u mean? What would make government want to sponsor it?
I'm just interested
Because it numbs your thinking, ie politicians would like to support this boring charade pretending to be thought provoking art.
@@DarkAngelEU how isn’t it art?