About the Advahuta from the Wiki: Avadhūta (IAST avadhūta) is a Sanskrit term from the root 'to shake' (see V. S. Apte and Monier-Williams) that, among its many uses, in some Indian religions indicates a type of mystic or saint who is beyond egoic-consciousness, duality and common worldly concerns and acts without consideration for standard social etiquette. Avadhuta is a Jivanmukta who gives his insight to others and teach them about his realisation of the true nature of the ultimate reality (Brahman) and self (Atman) and takes the role of a guru to show the path of moksha to others.[1] Some Avadhuta also achieve the title of Paramahamsa. Similar figures (colloquially called 'mad/crazy monks') are also known in Buddhist traditions, such as the medieval Zen monk Ikkyū, and the 20th century Tibetan tulku Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche. In Tibetan Buddhism the equivalent type is called a nyönpa (Wylie: smyon pa). en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avadhuta Funny. To me, at this point, the Advahut Gita is far more sane than the collective madhouse of samsara. In fact, it is another definition of, or pointer to, sanity as teachings on this level often appear to be. Of course that's my crazy opinion.
@@geetaliification There is only one voice, but if this illusory difference helps you to believe that 'The Ribhu Gita' is your story it will happen through grace.
Perhaps a few points on this might be useful. It is essential to consider and understand the term "view" with teachings like this. Well, with all teachings, but this is some high octane dharma. When you understand the view that a teaching is being presented from, (and that is rather important to the West and one is not already immersed in the teaching system) then you are able to entertain the liberating concepts more openly rather than rejecting them flat out because they induce a cognitive dissonance in contrast to your current view and lie outside of your stock confirmation bias. An example would be, if I have ingested a psychedelic substance and you have not and we are in a room together then we could be seeing the same room differently. Another example is if there were an island at the center of a small lake and I was on one side and you on the other, then we would have two different views of the same island. Lastly, if you were in a valley looking up and I was on the summit of a mountain looking down again, our views will be vastly different, but of the same territory. So, the pith advice is to always include the question, just what view might this expression be coming from? Then, what is the intent of the teaching? That way you can open your mind and expand your consciousness to receive what may be profound, but easily dismissed due to expectations and misunderstanding. There is also a distinction between provisional, (this because of that, relative) and definitive, (just this, that's all, ultimate) teachings. Be Well!
Simply the best channel on UA-cam. Your work is grace in this world. 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼🧡
There is something in me that is indescribable that compels me to thank you profusely.
When it couldn't possibly get any more beautiful, it did! The Heart is grateful.
Love the silence between the words! Thank you for making the truth available to all who listen! Namaste dear one!!!!
There is no words to say how much I thank you devine soul. Bless you sir.
Your voice really captures the spirit of the timeless being expressed here. Beautiful.
So beautiful! Thank you so much for making this video.
Well done! Please continue. Thanks and thanks again.
That was a wow !
Thank you Lomakayu 🌹
About the Advahuta from the Wiki:
Avadhūta (IAST avadhūta) is a Sanskrit term from the root 'to shake' (see V. S. Apte and Monier-Williams) that, among its many uses, in some Indian religions indicates a type of mystic or saint who is beyond egoic-consciousness, duality and common worldly concerns and acts without consideration for standard social etiquette. Avadhuta is a Jivanmukta who gives his insight to others and teach them about his realisation of the true nature of the ultimate reality (Brahman) and self (Atman) and takes the role of a guru to show the path of moksha to others.[1] Some Avadhuta also achieve the title of Paramahamsa.
Similar figures (colloquially called 'mad/crazy monks') are also known in Buddhist traditions, such as the medieval Zen monk Ikkyū, and the 20th century Tibetan tulku Chögyam Trungpa Rinpoche. In Tibetan Buddhism the equivalent type is called a nyönpa (Wylie: smyon pa).
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Avadhuta
Funny. To me, at this point, the Advahut Gita is far more sane than the collective madhouse of samsara. In fact, it is another definition of, or pointer to, sanity as teachings on this level often appear to be. Of course that's my crazy opinion.
This is blissful :)
💫🙏
Thank you thank you.
Please don't forget about Viekachudamani. Left us on a cliffhanger!
Dattatreya is referred to the ancient seer in the Bhagabata Puran. is called ABADHUTA . I greatly admire Lomakayu, his rich Upanishadic voice.
I love your voice. Please also do "Ribhu Gita". Please please 🙏
ua-cam.com/video/6nQu2z0p-pA/v-deo.html
@@8Ivion8 no I know.... I meant in lomakayu's voice
@@geetaliification There is only one voice, but if this illusory difference helps you to believe that 'The Ribhu Gita' is your story it will happen through grace.
Playback speed = 1.25 or 1.5. 🙏🏼
Who else is here from Aaron Abke??
Where's part 2 of this one
Thank you me.
Thank you for your help
Perhaps a few points on this might be useful.
It is essential to consider and understand the term "view" with teachings like this. Well, with all teachings, but this is some high octane dharma.
When you understand the view that a teaching is being presented from, (and that is rather important to the West and one is not already immersed in the teaching system) then you are able to entertain the liberating concepts more openly rather than rejecting them flat out because they induce a cognitive dissonance in contrast to your current view and lie outside of your stock confirmation bias.
An example would be, if I have ingested a psychedelic substance and you have not and we are in a room together then we could be seeing the same room differently. Another example is if there were an island at the center of a small lake and I was on one side and you on the other, then we would have two different views of the same island. Lastly, if you were in a valley looking up and I was on the summit of a mountain looking down again, our views will be vastly different, but of the same territory.
So, the pith advice is to always include the question, just what view might this expression be coming from? Then, what is the intent of the teaching? That way you can open your mind and expand your consciousness to receive what may be profound, but easily dismissed due to expectations and misunderstanding.
There is also a distinction between provisional, (this because of that, relative) and definitive, (just this, that's all, ultimate) teachings.
Be Well!
avadhoot..not advatbhuta