New Elementary Particle Proposed
Вставка
- Опубліковано 6 чер 2024
- Here I propose a new particle called the "trifle,” which is an element of consciousness-the subjective part of you that thinks and feels. This particle interacts with all other elementary particles of your body, contributing to your sense of self and being attached to your body.
Why was this in my feed? In other news, do you want to buy a crystal that magnifies the trifle power?
I’m not quite sure how UA-cam targets potential viewers. I apologize for any inconvenience caused. Nonetheless, I appreciate you watching!
The weird is strong in this one.
No one finds it more peculiar than I do. However, I can discover no alternative path to consciousness. Both emergence and illusion prove inadequate. Thank you for watching and for your comments!
@@biochemistadriftI think he finds it weird the strange and unsupported claims you make.
I've noticed that the farther south you go the more IQ goes down. My father thought there may be something in the water
I propose that consciousness is an emergent property of large neural networks. Just as a traffic jam cannot occur with only a few cars, consciousness cannot be explained by single particles but is a byproduct of a complex interaction of many particles, specifically synapses connecting neurons.
Now to this Video:
It's concerning and potentially dangerous to mix real science with speculative philosophy in this manner. This can confuse people and erode trust in genuine scientific research. Please consider clearly distinguishing your speculative thoughts from established science when presenting to the public.
Additionally, the title is misleading. "Discovered" is certainly the wrong term. At the very least, a question mark should be added. Otherwise, this is misleading and toxic misinformation.
I agree. This seems like an argument by a theist trying to justify a soul.
My channel endeavors to mesh Christianity with science. Therefore, it is inevitable that I incorporate supernatural concepts such as the soul and God. Nonetheless, I truly value your perspective. Thank you for watching and sharing your thoughts!
@@user-ln1ec9qr5y I'm definitely a theist trying to incorporate the soul with the scientist's viewpoint.Thanks for watching and commenting!
@@biochemistadrift of course you try to mix religion and science. You end of with an abortion of pseudoscience and bad religion.
Your first mistake is inventing fake science. Real science is based on evidence. Yours is not since you have to fabricate things to bridge the two.
Your second mistake is religion failing. Religion is supposed to be based on faith. When you invent pseudoscience to prop up weak faith you do not grow in faith but false science beliefs which results in a very weak religion.
So you end up with fake science and a lousy religion. You destroyed two things at once with your Fabrications.
@@biochemistadrift no shit. I already told you that. Anybody who boasts lies about science has to believe they have an invisible magic friend who will torture you forever because he loves you, LOL.
ITS A LOAD OF HORSE SHIT.
babe wake up new particle dropped
Thanks for watching and commenting!
WARNING: Kook alert!! 😅😂🤣😂😅
Evidence strongly suggests that you move your body based on your mental choices. How do you believe this process occurs?
@@biochemistadrift it called muscles, LOL. Your imaginary particles:
A. Do not exist.
B. Have ZERO evidence to back up your outlandish claims.
SCIENCE IS BASED ON EVIDENCE AND YOU SUPPLIED NONE.
You are not doing science at all but simply preaching. I don't know if you're completely ignorant about science or just lying to fool people.
Either way, your behavior is horrendous and a fine example of how harmful religion is.
@@biochemistadrift you should learn about how the human nervous system works. It is well understood by scientists, one of which you are not, well documented and does not work at all on how you purport.
So are you just ignorant or intentionally spreading lies?
@@biochemistadrift The things that allow you to move your body are called muscles, LOLOL
First graders know this, you can learn from them.
@biochemistadrift I like your channel
This guy claims to discover elementary particles without a particle accelerator. He can do it with his imagination! LOLOLOL
You were correct; the term “discovered” was not the most appropriate word choice. Given that the topic is theoretical, the revised title better reflects the nature of the particle, "New Elementary Particle Proposed." I appreciate your feedback.
@@biochemistadrift Thank you for admitting you lied. Now you need to acknowledge the other lies.
@@user-ln1ec9qr5yno gives a fuck what you think.
Do you have any references to this particle? any papers where its theorised? id like to read it.
I have introduced the particle here. Currently, there are no papers to reference, as I have yet to write one. You might consider examining the work of David Chalmers, who posits that there is more to the world than what is currently known by scientists. I appreciate you watching and commenting !
@@biochemistadrift Chalmers is a dualist, and his ideas are metaphysical bunk, and not at all scientific. Construct whatever models of mind that you like, but don't wrap it in the trappings of particle physics or really any science.
Yup an angel told him in his sleep... (just random bs)
The mind/body problem arises at the intersection of the mental and physical realms. How can we resolve it without delving into physical aspects such as particle physics? I am in search of answers and welcome your ideas. Thank you for your input.
I have been attempting to comprehend the connection between the mind and body for many years. To me, it’s not merely random nonsense. How do you believe your mind controls your body? I'm open to suggestions. Thanks for watching and commenting!
have you heard of the penrose quantum consciousness? it was recently confirmed by a third party. my source is sabine hossenfielder. who references the paper. my idea is derivative of panpsychsm. i think all that can be measured has the potential to measure. thats how ive liked to think of it so far. do you have any religous views? id be interested in your take on some there philosophy. especially dharmic inquiry.
I am familiar with Penrose’s concept, though I must admit I have not studied it in depth. This video does seem to echo the principles of panpsychism, which suggests that consciousness is a property of all entities. My perspective, however, leans more towards the belief that there is a person behind everything. Just as you are connected to your body and I am to mine, God is connected to everything else. It all has a purpose.
Kids, don't eat red muchrooms with white dots... trust me, just don't.
Thanks for watching!
Is this satire? I seriously hope so! 😂😂
Thanks for watching!
👍
Thanks!!
Is this a joke? 😂😂😂😂😂
Thanks for watching and commenting!
Nonsense
Thanks for watching and commenting!