I just got into camera photography. I'm glad that my first camera is a Fujifilm. I bought the XT20 as I can't afford the XT2 and XT3 yet. I have the 18-55 and 23 f2. Love them.
Camera choice is not about sensor size or quantity of megapixels, it’s about feeling and enjoying of using the whole system. This camera gives the feeling of enjoying photography.
Agree 100%.Fuji, especially the XT3 is the first manufacture to make the art and passion of photography fun again. Something Canon, Sony and Nikon suck at.
@Ziggi Mon gripless bodies?? Stupid unintelligent dslr fangirl comment. All Fuji caneras have good usefull grips, are you blind? Better yet they are light and small especially compared to hod awfull 35mm sized sensor cameras using old antique technolgy DSLR flappy mirrors, huge, subject imposing, heavy, ugly, hard to hold or carry for any length of time so call "FF" if marketing bull crap when full frame are really crop sensors of medium format. Sensor size Dr ie not matter except to those ego driven pixel peeping picture takers.
You can actually turn the settings off for the touch screen whenever you're using the EVF. Settings > button/dials setting > touch screen settings > evf touch screen area settings = off
Loved the review. I’m just getting more into photography and I guess I will choose the Fujifilm xt3 instead of the a7iii. It just felt better in my hand. Instant love. Btw... a question that I don’t seem to find an answer too... How large can you print !? Can you print poster size and still have a good quality. I’m looking to shoot fine-art photography and would love to print my pics. Thanks 🙏 to anybody answering this. Mucho kudos. 🙌 btw... I’m not a pixel peeper nor do I care about full frame vs other. I believe that photography should just transmit emotions. It’s all in eye of the beholder.
The kit lens is only like 200 dollars if bought with the camera. The 16-55 f2.8 is over 1000 dollars. There is no comparison there at all. The kit lens also has image stabilization and is awesome for its price.
I have the XT2 and the A7III and 100% agree with the closing comment. The Sony is in all respects the 'better' camera and still I grab the Fuji more because of the 'soul'. Hard to explain unless you can use them side by side.
You can get a longer eyepiece from amazon for around £7 (Same quality as the original one) and you can lock the touch af using the upper right corner! You're welcome !
Nice review and great video. I own and XT3 and agree with you but only one thing i think you are totally wrong. The "Kit" lens 18-55 is a really great lens. either for photo or video. And you're wrong about maximum aperture. Is a 2.8 - 4. Cheers.
Good luck with it. You have to dig into manual photography from the beginning because there are no scene presets like on other cameras. But I can tell you, it is worth it.
@@AxelRHD Ohh thanks a lot for the tip.. I have learnt a lot from online courses.. I'm just waiting to get my hands on this camera..though I still need to learn a lot . Any help will be really appreciated.
I have tried both fuji xt3 and sony a7iii. To be honest, I cannot choose between two of them because they all have pros and cons. I think choosing a camera depends on your needs, your budget and yourself too
Yes same here I have a7lll and sony a6500 but I'm curious about xt3 maybe next generation with ibis but all reviews I saw the photos are great even in jpeg .
Thank you for the great review! Do you recommend the combination of the XT3 with the 16-55 2.8 even though they both have no IBIS&OIS? How it effects the IQ? Thanks :)
The Fujifilm feels better in the hands than the Sony and to me seems fun to shoot with. Native Fujifilm lenses cost less than native Sony cameras. Image quality is similar to the A7 III as long as you’re not shooting in low light. The Fuji body is also cheaper. If these features are enough, then get the Fuji. But to me, the Sony A7 III is my favourite camera nonetheless. Native lenses are indeed expensive. But Sony fits a full frame sensor in a body similar in size to the XT3. As a result, low light performance is extremely good (and I love shooting low light in an era where in day light, there is too little difference between smartphone camera quality and pro camera quality). Dynamic range is very high in the A7 III - I rarely find myself having to shoot multiple photos and merge them. And I find it very fun to shoot with, although I would love it to have as much of a mechanical feel as the Fuji.
I will be using the A7SII alongside a Fuji XT-3. The lowlight and IBIS of the A7SII is usefull in situations the XT3 can't be useful in. I would use the XT3 70% of the time though, it's that good.
Why do you recommend the XF 16-55mm over the kit XF 18-55mm lense? Please explain in terms that would be understandable to someone who's never owned a camera, only a smartphone. (I'm not the only person thinking of getting this for their first camera lolol)
Loved your review! No doubt that the new Xt4 is with all upgrades ( sUch as IBIS, rotating screen) and price 😅. I am planning to buy Fuji xt4, do you still recommend should go with the same in 2020?
Our review on that is coming soon. In a nutshell if you don’t need IBIS or the rotating screen it’s not a big upgrade. There are improvements for sure but might not be as much as you think. However I really like it and if you don’t have the XT3 already go for the XT4
You can handle the problem with the "nose tipping autofocus" with an option to set a smaller size of the touch display (while looking through the viewfinder).
I'm actually wondering if the upcoming xh2 may be the perfect camera for me: ibis, bigger grip, hopefully better battery and fugi lense and ecosystem. I can't wait.
For street photography I just bought the XT-3, I am still getting used to the camera and I see that it has a lot of potential. I also use my Nikon D-810 which serves me well for other type of photography.
Thnx for the review..I'm a FujiFilm XT-2 user, the only thing I will complain are the histogram and high light clipping tool..they are not correct and Fuji know this, but not solved!!!! And by the way, why don't use you the lens hoods??????
Very helpful review. I'm strongly considering the X-t3. I'm also sort of waiting for the Sony 7000 to come out before I buy. (And now I've heard Fugi might release a FF!). But I'm leaning towards the X-t3.
The rumors on a Full Frame Fujifilm don’t seem to have much weight. Also they would need to come out with a new series of lenses unless they somehow manage to adapt GFX lenses to the body
Oh Dude - you are a legend. You are one of the only testers who has ever called out that crappy, imposter kit lens for what it really is! Oh my goodness, I can't believe how many people recommend that dodgy lens. I had 3 copies of that thing over as many years - searching for that optical Nirvana, that everybody raves about. Wasn't until I got the gorgeous 16-55 that I realised what a quality zoom should be like. Great call out and thanks for that!
Nice video mate, worth noting that Fuji make the best 18_55mm of any camera. There is no sharper 18_55 out there. Every lens Fuji do besides the kit lens is unbeatable and the XT range are the best for vintage lenses and manual glass.
Thanks for the review! I was set on the sony now I can't decide between the two haha. I will be using it to shoot mostly professional food/recipe photos and video, but also as an all around camera in my spare time. I just wish the fuji had a better battery life like the sony. Also, I heard fuji files are not as compliant with lightroom?
buddy hello. greetings from Turkey dude i'm stuck between sony a7III and fuji xt3. I have a sigma 35mm canon 135L and 16-35 f4 + MC11 adapter. I left the Canon. I have canon lenses. I'm going to take the sony a7III adapter and continue or fujı xt3. What do you think I should choose between the two devices? I'm a wedding and fashion photographer. Which advice would you give me?
Thanks for watching. This really depends what you like. Are you a photographer mainly or also into video. If you like video then take away the CL. If you want a camera for photography then it’s different. The XT3 is a fantastic camera. Fast autofocus, a number of great APS-C lenses, but image quality compared to the CL isn’t as good. The CL is compact, great image quality especially with the 35 1.4. For many it’s as good as the M10. The 35 is also a “reference” lens. Shoot wide open and enjoy some beautiful bokeh with your subject razor sharp. Autofocus isn’t as good as Fujifilm though so keep that in mind.
I've tried my friend's XT3 and it is a great camera! Not denying that at all. But.........better than the A7III? In my opinion, absolutely not! Better autofocus and tracking, better in low light, and the image quality is amazing, not "decent" as you say. There are down sides to the A7III as there is with every camera but for me, having used both and an owner of two A7III's, I'd pick the A7III ten times out of ten. The XT3 is not that far behind though and a great camera for anyone to enjoy! Fujifilm is definitely making a statement that they are a force to be reckoned with!
It feels weird seeing him 'testing' the autofocus on the gokarts with AF-S or single point. It probably wouldve been better if he used AF-C, continuous.
Reason is because the lens was too long for the track, AF-C wasn’t able to hold as easy as AF-S since I had to manually track the karts. This is what i why I said it’s user error in the video
Great video. I’m Big fan OF Fujifilm. In the next Fuji video I recommand to use the great small and practical kit Lens the Fujinon XF 18-55 F2.8. Great AF and images from it are superb
How much difference would you say there is in th "shooting experience" between the xt3 and the hx1? Is the actual functioning of the hx1 pretty similar to the xt3?
Haven’t tried the XH1 to compare but I’m guessing the experience will be similar. Fujifilm does a good job of keeping a familiarity to their camera lineup
if the a73 did not come out I would have gotten the xt2 or the t2 because one it would be cheaper and have more in the budget to get those primes and some zoom lens; but since I have the a73 buying another system would not benefit me since I am a little invested in the Sony ecosystem, yet if I got the a6400 then it would be good but I have full frame lens. i am telling my friends and family who are starting to get into photography to start with Fuji because this day and age, everyone wants that "film" look and FujiFilm made the film so there is that.
Thanks for watching. Yes it’s hard to switch after investing in the Sony System. I would stick to the A73 vs a6400. Also the crop factor and lens size will throw off the balance of the a6400
@@TECH360TV big facts and since I primarily shoot photos that full frame goodness is unmatched unless medium format but for that kind of money I can get the holy trinity and maybe some primes.
That's the reason I shoot Fuji and not Sony. Sony cameras are soulless. I love the things Fuji bring to the table too - like the film emulation, but I'd rather not walk around with a PlayStation with a lens on it strapped to me. So, Sony? Never.
Nicholas Kellingley my sentiments exactly. Sony has such a sterile, “clinical” look. I didn’t know how else to put it. I debated between the Sony a7 and Fuji xt1 when I got my first mirrorless. I disliked the Sony look in spite of its full-frame capability. I now shoot on an xt3 and love it.
@@LandsPlanes image quality is just better with the XT3. 10 bit color is a game changer, 400mbps helps even more and 4k 60p is like icing on the cake. Overall the XT3 shine especially in challenging scenarios over the A7iii
@@airgliderz Here is a size comparison between XT3w/Xf1655 and A7IIIw/24105G: j.mp/2SJNYez They are about the same size and look, while A7III has a larger grip( a welcome change on XH1). I found the ergonomics of XT3 is not great at all because of the tiny grip. But I guess it is fun to use because of the dials.
@@cks7249clearly haven't taken photos on a Fuji o suggest you rent both and get your opinion with your own receipts rather than basing you opinions on what the internet says.
Thanks for the video. I came for the 200mm! I would not skip the "kit lens". It is excellent performance for the price when purchased with the body and blows other kit lenses that I have used away. It is also the least expensive way to get XF OIS if you want to get going with handheld video. I prefer the images from the older primes over the f2s and particularly love the 35 1.4 as a walk around. But I dont get to play in the rain with it. I wonder if the issue you had with tracking on the 200 had more to do with having face detection on (at least in the clip of the karts you showed)? I know my XT3 can sometimes get a little wonky when there are no faces (without helmets) in the scene. Why are you converting aperture when discussing FF equivalence. It sounds wrong and people are going to get grumpy.
Thanks for watching. Tracking with the 200 was difficult I believe due to the lens being too Long for the track with the teleconverter on it. I tried many different modes before settling on the one in the video. This was user error 💯. No knowing the track a 100+ would be much better. I shot with the kit lens but didn’t find it outstanding. Perhaps on video it’s better but it was okay only. I feel a good kit lens should be fast enough for night and day photos. As for the converting of numbers, some don’t like it, but there is a difference from full frame.
I noticed with many of your shots you weren’t shooting with the 180 degree shutter rule, I’m assuming it’s because you were trying to compensate for the lack of light but without stabilization, it doesn’t pan out well even with the steadiest of hands. I was tempted by fujifilm when this camera released but I like to be versatile and be able to shoot in any condition and keep my images clean and without grain as much as I can and that means going full frame and I can’t go back now. Thanks for the review !
@@TECH360TV yeah .. absolutely .. no doubt about it , but just take care of that don't misinform others .. like you said that the kit lens is f5.6 … which isn't true at all …
It is more like a commercial than a decent review. Although it is a relatively good camera.The battery is not ‘pretty decent’ it is the obvious weakness. Likewise the low light performance.
Sorry you felt that way. This is not a commercial for the XT3. As mentioned the battery grip is necessary or extra batteries for all day filming and photography. Low light is comparable to other cameras, but the lens has a lot to do with that. Faster lens produces better low light shots.
Is the Fuji better than the Sony? Personally I don’t like the analog style dials. Shot film for 40 years and I’m sick of them. Don’t get me wrong I think the Fuji is a great camera but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. I went from Canon FF to Sony FF and I like the advantages of FF so aps-c is not going to cut it. I do think the GFX series looks very interesting however. Comparing the Fuji and Sony is like apples and oranges to me. If you compare this camera to say the Sony a6400 that would be more like it. The focusing on the a6400 is pretty hard to beat though. I did enjoy your video and presentation but I’m not sold on what camera is “better”. After all it’s the photographer that makes the magic happen.
Appreciate the reply and understand your points. I also prefer full frame but enjoy the versatility the XT3 offers for the price. Up to 30 Fps burst mode, film profiles (some like this some don’t), better 4K recording etc. As I said in the video, the A7III does a lot of things right, but I enjoyed the feel and usability of the Fujifilm more. Yes and I agree with your last sentence 💯
True, so true. But that bad ass 90mm 1.8 is a beast. I love my camera. But I can shoot with ANY camera. You definitely miss the upgrades when you pick up some bullshit...like the Fuji kml
Hi - I love shooting my XT3 - I have access to an A7iii as well. Both are awesome but I actually enjoy the Fuji more. However on your go kart section you mention focus tracking - but you are shooting in AFS not AFC (at least on the video shown) so it doesn't do moving object focus tracking in that AFS mode. AFC would have tracked the kart much better.
thank you very much, that video helps me alot with my choice 🙏 The problem with the nose is no problem, because you can disable the side of the touchscreen controls where the nose touch. left or right side.
I have a bigger nose too. I just bought the Fujifilm X-T1 extended eyepiece (Long Eyecup) and swap it and it works perfectly from nose contact with the screen.
Just spent a day photographing Rallycross with the XT3 and the 200mm f2. I find the shutter button to be too close to the overall slim downed body. Unlike most other cameras the shutter release is not located further forward and on a separate bulb part of the camera moulding. In my view this detracts from the general handling of the camera. The pricing of the 200mm is just £1,000 less than the Holy Grail of all lenses - the Canon 300mm f2.8. I don't understand the reasoning behind this - and of course the Bokeh can't match this on a FF camera body. The slimmed down camera body coupled with such a large lens is a questionable mix.
For the SLR styled Fuji cameras, I still enjoy using my X-H1 over my X-T3. There is a "feel" to the H1 that I cannot get with the T3 and I thoroughly love the H1's shutter mechanism. Once I got the 16-55, I started to wonder why I did not get that lens sooner. In the process, I have all the 1.x primes so I guess that is a bonus for waiting so long to get the 16-55. :p I think you needed to spend more time on the tracking AF. When I use the T3 with a selected wide tracking area (compared to what appeared as single focus point) and use one of the tracking presets I can normally get a majority of action shots I'm trying to capture. Enjoyed the video. :)
Hi Martin thanks for the comment. Haven’t tried the H1 yet but perhaps in the future. As for the tracking, the Lens was far too long so I had to change the focus point to work correctly. User error 💯. Thanks for watching. Much appreciated
If its not full frame... im off this train!! If you make prints .. full frame makes all the difference!! ... now if your mainly posting pics or just having them on your ipad... then im sure the fuji is great...
Yes will be buying this fuji after all, the sony a7iii is my 1st choice of upgrade but it is not made in Japan that why i switch to Fujifilm camera TX3. Agreed with you on that len 16-55mm f2.8 my kind of shooting range for APSC.
I like fuji, I have an xt-2 that I love and I use it exclusively for photography ... but sony is a step ahead with everything (I know that because I own also a a6600 and a a7sII)
@Ziggi Mon going by spec the X-T3 should have the edge over the X-T2 in photos and video. I have the X-T2 but thinking of going to the X-T3 or a Panasonic g9 with Leica lens both cameras do 4k at 60fps.
I really like the old school dials on this camera to change the settings much better than the menu driven interface Sony utilizes for their cameras (I currently have an RX V100 and I dont like that aspect of it) . I think the Fuji would be much better in this regard, buI think I may get an AIII. I want to do low light photos and video as well as landscape astrophotography so I think the full frame Sony would be a better fit for me.
You really need to quit converting aperture, as that only matters in terms of DOF ... it is the same no matter the format when it comes to light gathering. SO for night shooting, 1.4 is 1.4 on APSC or FF ... gets really boring watching reviewers state the 'equivalence' every 2 minutes - also do more research, the Fuji 'kit' lens is 2.8 - 4 and is very decent
@@Cagey7531 Sorry you are text reading, i see the difference between a FF and Crop when using their respectively lens in aperture. I see a depth of field and exposure difference, but nowadays because of technology its very close but you can still see the difference
A7RIII IQ is very impressive especially the dynamic range. I wouldn’t compare that to the XT3 as they are different cameras really. I’ve gotten some great images from the Sony when paired with the right lenses.
Autofocus is faster, video is non started on the xt1, immense on xt3. That said, I’m selling my xt3 and keeping my xt1, love them both but I don’t crop much so 16mp works fine, also do mainly landscape so don’t miss better autofocus. Xt1 is still great!
Tools manufacturers always manufacture new modified tools. But only the person who uses those tools, knows which tool is for him and what he can do with it.
Switched after ten years from Canon to Fuji. And I love it. The photos from fuji all better than from my Canon APS C cameras.Canon has missed the last few years too much. But the lightroom workflow sucks
If You ask if the Fujifilm XT-3 is better than the SONY A7III - that is hard to judge. Each camera has its streghts and asking such questions is a bit tricky. But if You really want to compare the color science, sensitivity, sharpness, etc, You can look at the comparometer at Imaging Resource and the answer is clear. SONY A7III is sharper at every ISO and delivers far more detail, even if it has little less megapixels. There are Canon cameras, like the 5D MkIV. which has much more megapixels and still it delivers less details than the SONY A7III. And the noise levels? SONY is better. And the color rendition? I think both are excellent and none of them is really better. That is my experience.
in body stabilization is already a no go for xt3 on video and picture! if had the money will like to have both cameras just to experience the xt3 film classic
its a shame that reviewers of the X-T3 lack a basic understanding of how ISO is calibrated. ISO is not a true measurement in the sense its an industry standard, but is relative, Canon, Sony and Nikon use the REI standard and Fuji use the SOS standard that is considered more objective. When these standards are aligned the Fuji's IOS is relatively higher at a given IOS than the other manufacturers meaning the Fuji's ISO performance is nearly identical (approximately within half a stop) in performance vs the Sony. Again, this is the case of camera makers using dodgy settings to fool the public into believing that a camera has an high ISO when in fact the improvement is in the markings on the dial rather than actual sensor improvement.
Thanks for the comment, but also realise that what you wrote here won’t be understood by most who just come to watch and learn if the camera is good or not. We keep things simple here. There are other channels love to get into the math and calculations. We don’t here at this time. On a side note, Merry Christmas!
The X-T3 is great but it has limitations in stills for professional shooting. You can't compare an APS-C with a FF sensor. It just can't touch the HDR and low light performance of the Sony a7III. No IS in body neither on the best basic zoom lens 16-55mm f/2.8. For APS-C is a superb choice (maybe top) but who can afford the XF 200mm f/2??? You go from $1900 which is the most "affordable" XF lens (100-400mm) to $6000!!! There's a huge gap over there...
I found the the information on the 18-55 misleading as many other people here. Especially considering the price, the 18-55 is a beautiful piece of glass and will make 90% of the people very happy. Of course the 16-55 is superior in many ways, but its also a lot pricier. Well, it has become quite obvious for me that you target those of us that are willing to spend thousands of dollars and I guess we shouldn't be expecting budget tips from you. But saying that the "kit lens", which is the XF18-5mm f2.8-4, is not a good deal, is flat out wrong for the majority of people. Also, as I'm reading through the comments with your replies, you seem to justify yourself about the kit lens. Just a tip: it's not as bad as you think to admit once in while when you're wrong. Have a good day!
I do admit when I’m wrong but these are my opinions. You may disagree with me and that’s fine. I’m open to discussion but because I believe in something different than you doesn’t require me to admit I’m wrong. There is not right or wrong answer in photography. Everyone has their own thoughts etc.
@@TECH360TV I agree with you on that one. Yet I still think that for the majority of people the 18-55 2.8-4 kit lens is a great recommendation. But then I guess we agree to disagree. But let's not forget that we're all here for the love of Fuji, so enjoy shooting!
I agree we are here because we like Fuji and what they are doing. Reason sometimes I recommend higher priced lenses (not always but sometimes) is that time and time again I get questions about why do I have so much noise in my photos, why are my pics in Low light not so good, why aren’t my pictures sharp. Sometimes this is user error and sometimes they choose the least expensive lens only to find out that it limits how they want to shoot and capture images. The XT3 isn’t the best with Low light performance and some Complain about this. So I recommend the f2.8 to save them money in the long run. If they buy a cheap lens and try to sell it they can loose a lot in the process and end up spending more money than the higher priced one. There are exceptions to the rule but this happens a lot. In terms of budget friendly lenses I love the Z Mount 1.8 lenses. They are sharp, great bokeh and great colors for affordable prices. I also feel the same about the Sony 1.8 lenses too.
well,i have a7iii with Tamron 28 75 2.8 and i think its very good combination! i research for gimbal those days! check if you like my last video in very dark place,hammam exactly!
Biggest issue I have for extreme travel photography (I travel all over the world on either a motorcycle or hiking) in dust mostly, the 35 and 50 equiv 1.4 lenses are not weatherproof. Whyyyyyy? So stupid. I own a X-T3 as backup and a A7RIII which is my go to camera. But I'm thinking of selling the X-T3 for a A7III because it is stabilized and the lenses are weatherproof. Has anybody had experience with getting the 23 and 35 1.4 lenses and 56 1.2 in dusty and rainy environments?
Be careful in wet weather with the A7III. Some of the lenses might be okay, but Sony isn’t great on the weather sealing yet. I’m guessing the new versions in the future will be. Btw like the A7RIII, perhaps my favourite Sony
@@oliverlison Not all mounts are created equal. There is a video around showing the strength of an XT mount vs A7. Sony seems pretty brittle. But yeah I would use two hands specially since its not my camera!
@@felixtheengine any lens that is heavier than 600gr I would support with two hands. My heaviest lens is a 24-70 2.8.... But I somehow damage the mount. Maybe knocking camera/lens combo onto something..... I don't have Sony
I like Sony’s other camera’s like the A7R series and A9, but feel at a 2k price point the fujifilm has better video, and the photography aspect appealed to me more
Hey , I enjoyed the content but I think you underplayed the image quality of this vs a7iii. For some one looking to take sharp and quality photos, isn’t the Sony FF systems cheaper than Fuji APSC?
Thanks for watching. Sharp photos doesn’t mean it’s better. I can put a Zeiss Otus on a camera and get sharp photos. It’s about the whole package. The feel, Color science etc. Sony makes a great camera. I have taken some great pics with Sony cameras, just like the feel of the Fujifilm.
I just got into camera photography. I'm glad that my first camera is a Fujifilm. I bought the XT20 as I can't afford the XT2 and XT3 yet. I have the 18-55 and 23 f2. Love them.
Congrats on your camera and enjoy snapping pics.
That's great! I'm saving up for the Xt3 now and I'm gonna grab the 23mm as well.
got a6400,but gona upgrade to xt3, best aps rite now, video quality is soooooooooo pretty
Camera choice is not about sensor size or quantity of megapixels, it’s about feeling and enjoying of using the whole system. This camera gives the feeling of enjoying photography.
Very true. Some of my favourite cameras to use aren’t spec heavy.
Agree 100%.Fuji, especially the XT3 is the first manufacture to make the art and passion of photography fun again. Something Canon, Sony and Nikon suck at.
Ziggi Mon this manufacturer gives you a choice of different body types: slr, rangefinder, gripless or with it, whatever you want.
@Ziggi Mon gripless bodies?? Stupid unintelligent dslr fangirl comment. All Fuji caneras have good usefull grips, are you blind? Better yet they are light and small especially compared to hod awfull 35mm sized sensor cameras using old antique technolgy DSLR flappy mirrors, huge, subject imposing, heavy, ugly, hard to hold or carry for any length of time so call "FF" if marketing bull crap when full frame are really crop sensors of medium format. Sensor size Dr ie not matter except to those ego driven pixel peeping picture takers.
Lol that is what fanboys of inferior technology in their cameras say because since it cannot be measured. Guess that whatever you need to sleep happy
You can actually turn the settings off for the touch screen whenever you're using the EVF. Settings > button/dials setting > touch screen settings > evf touch screen area settings = off
Loved the review. I’m just getting more into photography and I guess I will choose the Fujifilm xt3 instead of the a7iii. It just felt better in my hand. Instant love. Btw... a question that I don’t seem to find an answer too... How large can you print !? Can you print poster size and still have a good quality. I’m looking to shoot fine-art photography and would love to print my pics. Thanks 🙏 to anybody answering this. Mucho kudos. 🙌 btw... I’m not a pixel peeper nor do I care about full frame vs other. I believe that photography should just transmit emotions. It’s all in eye of the beholder.
The kit lens is only like 200 dollars if bought with the camera. The 16-55 f2.8 is over 1000 dollars. There is no comparison there at all. The kit lens also has image stabilization and is awesome for its price.
Does the 16 to 55 lenses not have our?
@@allenschneider1847 no.
OIS?
@@allenschneider1847 No OIS on 16-55. I know it is weird.
@@akisasaki6661 OIS degrades image quality and makes the lens heavier.
I have the XT2 and the A7III and 100% agree with the closing comment. The Sony is in all respects the 'better' camera and still I grab the Fuji more because of the 'soul'. Hard to explain unless you can use them side by side.
You can get a longer eyepiece from amazon for around £7 (Same quality as the original one) and you can lock the touch af using the upper right corner! You're welcome !
Nice review and great video. I own and XT3 and agree with you but only one thing i think you are totally wrong. The "Kit" lens 18-55 is a really great lens. either for photo or video. And you're wrong about maximum aperture. Is a 2.8 - 4. Cheers.
Maybe he was referring to the other "kit lens" for fuji bodies. The 16-55 3.5-5.6
What Luis said. I have the lens and it's awesome. All the Fujinon lenses are awesome, for that matter. XF and GF.
I agree. The 18-55mm 2.8-4.0 is probably the best kit lens of any manufacturer. Bar none.
Yes. As Luis said. He did mention the 16-55 f5. Not the 18-55. I Don't think the 16-55 f5 is worth having at all.
@@andokewl But why would he mention that lens when the lens that comes with the X-T3 is the 18-55 f/2.8-f/4?
As predicted, IBIS did come out with the X-T4
Getting my xt3 this monday.. its my first camera .. wish me luck .
Good luck with it. You have to dig into manual photography from the beginning because there are no scene presets like on other cameras. But I can tell you, it is worth it.
@@AxelRHD Ohh thanks a lot for the tip.. I have learnt a lot from online courses.. I'm just waiting to get my hands on this camera..though I still need to learn a lot . Any help will be really appreciated.
Best of luck and enjoy the camera
@@TECH360TV Thanks a lot.. 😎😎
I heard you could make films out of this cam
I have tried both fuji xt3 and sony a7iii. To be honest, I cannot choose between two of them because they all have pros and cons. I think choosing a camera depends on your needs, your budget and yourself too
It’s not easy. Also it goes with the system you feel comfortable with
Yes same here I have a7lll and sony a6500 but I'm curious about xt3 maybe next generation with ibis but all reviews I saw the photos are great even in jpeg .
I had trouble too. Which is why I got both. But matching in post has been a bit of an issue. Still working on finding the best way
I own an xt2 and a7iii and use both for weddings :) fuji produces images couples love while a7iii is alright
But sony a7iii is better. I have the xt3.
Thank you for the great review! Do you recommend the combination of the XT3 with the 16-55 2.8 even though they both have no IBIS&OIS? How it effects the IQ? Thanks :)
Nice review! I’ve been using this camera professionally since it came out and I’m still blown away.
The Fujifilm feels better in the hands than the Sony and to me seems fun to shoot with. Native Fujifilm lenses cost less than native Sony cameras. Image quality is similar to the A7 III as long as you’re not shooting in low light. The Fuji body is also cheaper. If these features are enough, then get the Fuji.
But to me, the Sony A7 III is my favourite camera nonetheless. Native lenses are indeed expensive. But Sony fits a full frame sensor in a body similar in size to the XT3. As a result, low light performance is extremely good (and I love shooting low light in an era where in day light, there is too little difference between smartphone camera quality and pro camera quality). Dynamic range is very high in the A7 III - I rarely find myself having to shoot multiple photos and merge them. And I find it very fun to shoot with, although I would love it to have as much of a mechanical feel as the Fuji.
I will be using the A7SII alongside a Fuji XT-3. The lowlight and IBIS of the A7SII is usefull in situations the XT3 can't be useful in. I would use the XT3 70% of the time though, it's that good.
Why do you recommend the XF 16-55mm over the kit XF 18-55mm lense? Please explain in terms that would be understandable to someone who's never owned a camera, only a smartphone.
(I'm not the only person thinking of getting this for their first camera lolol)
the comments say the 18-55 is bettter. better F stop
Loved your review! No doubt that the new Xt4 is with all upgrades ( sUch as IBIS, rotating screen) and price 😅. I am planning to buy Fuji xt4, do you still recommend should go with the same in 2020?
Our review on that is coming soon. In a nutshell if you don’t need IBIS or the rotating screen it’s not a big upgrade. There are improvements for sure but might not be as much as you think. However I really like it and if you don’t have the XT3 already go for the XT4
@@TECH360TV many thanks for instant reply! Now i can make my mind 👍🏼
Really enjoyed your review. It's great that you include a review of different lenses for the camera. Keep up the good work!
Thanks for watching
You can handle the problem with the "nose tipping autofocus" with an option to set a smaller size of the touch display (while looking through the viewfinder).
Yes, and as mentioned it can be rectified but the fact The Eye piece is very close to the screen is something that can’t be fixed
I'm actually wondering if the upcoming xh2 may be the perfect camera for me: ibis, bigger grip, hopefully better battery and fugi lense and ecosystem. I can't wait.
Perhaps. Will be interesting to see what they come up with
Its announced now hahaha
For street photography I just bought the XT-3, I am still getting used to the camera and I see that it has a lot of potential. I also use my Nikon D-810 which serves me well for other type of photography.
It does. It take a few weeks or so to get used to a camera
Shooting with the xt3 but cannot give up my Nikon FF the Fuji just can’t keep up
That FUJINON lens gives me a serious STIFFY!! Work of art to look at!!
It definitely is
Being a M43 shooter I have to admit this Fuji is amazing. Fuji is great if you want to invest in APSC world. Thanks for the review
No prob! Thanks for watching
Is it ideal for wedding & Street photography ?
Thnx for the review..I'm a FujiFilm XT-2 user, the only thing I will complain are the histogram and high light clipping tool..they are not correct and Fuji know this, but not solved!!!! And by the way, why don't use you the lens hoods??????
Thanks for watching. For video purposes to show the size of the lens we don’t use them.
Very helpful review. I'm strongly considering the X-t3. I'm also sort of waiting for the Sony 7000 to come out before I buy. (And now I've heard Fugi might release a FF!). But I'm leaning towards the X-t3.
The rumors on a Full Frame Fujifilm don’t seem to have much weight. Also they would need to come out with a new series of lenses unless they somehow manage to adapt GFX lenses to the body
Have you used the "Kit Lens"? By the way its an 18-55mm f2.8-4.0, no 5.6 here.
In my opinion, the best 2 primes in the Fuji world are the 16/1.4 and 90/2. You can have those 2 and not have anything else and enjoy a superb IQ.
Didn’t have the chance to try them. Perhaps in the future. Thanks for watching
Correction, Fuji’s two best Primes are the 16 and 56 F/1.2....with no IBIS or OIS, you’re gonna have a lot of rejects with the 90 F/2
Oh Dude - you are a legend. You are one of the only testers who has ever called out that crappy, imposter kit lens for what it really is! Oh my goodness, I can't believe how many people recommend that dodgy lens. I had 3 copies of that thing over as many years - searching for that optical Nirvana, that everybody raves about. Wasn't until I got the gorgeous 16-55 that I realised what a quality zoom should be like. Great call out and thanks for that!
Haha thank you. Well got a lot of heat for that in the comments. Thanks for the support 😊
Wow. This review is amazing! Honest, clear and on point! Loving it!
Thank you! Appreciate the support and comment.
Instablaster...
Nice video mate, worth noting that Fuji make the best 18_55mm of any camera. There is no sharper 18_55 out there. Every lens Fuji do besides the kit lens is unbeatable and the XT range are the best for vintage lenses and manual glass.
Thanks for watching. Haven’t tried vintage lenses with it. Perhaps in the future
Thanks for the review! I was set on the sony now I can't decide between the two haha. I will be using it to shoot mostly professional food/recipe photos and video, but also as an all around camera in my spare time. I just wish the fuji had a better battery life like the sony. Also, I heard fuji files are not as compliant with lightroom?
Rumoured X-T4 is supposed to be announced soon. Lightroom handles the files fine. Both will do the job but I like fuji colors more.
@@TECH360TV Thanks!
Plus you can Always buy third party batteries for ten bucks each ;)
buddy hello. greetings from Turkey
dude i'm stuck between sony a7III and fuji xt3.
I have a sigma 35mm canon 135L and 16-35 f4 + MC11 adapter.
I left the Canon. I have canon lenses.
I'm going to take the sony a7III adapter and continue
or fujı xt3.
What do you think I should choose between the two devices?
I'm a wedding and fashion photographer.
Which advice would you give me?
Hmmm if you have Canon lenses there are adapters for Sony that will give you autofocus capabilities for your lenses. Might look into that option
Would you do a review of Fuji X-T3/T4 using third party lenses...such as Viltrox
Perhaps in the future if there is a big demand for it. I don’t have connections with Viltrox lens at the moment. If that changes will look into it
What camera did you film this video with?
This was filmed using a Panasonic GH5!
Great vdo. How would you compare XT-3 to Leica CL + TL 35mm f1.4?
Thanks for watching.
This really depends what you like. Are you a photographer mainly or also into video. If you like video then take away the CL.
If you want a camera for photography then it’s different. The XT3 is a fantastic camera. Fast autofocus, a number of great APS-C lenses, but image quality compared to the CL isn’t as good.
The CL is compact, great image quality especially with the 35 1.4. For many it’s as good as the M10. The 35 is also a “reference” lens. Shoot wide open and enjoy some beautiful bokeh with your subject razor sharp.
Autofocus isn’t as good as Fujifilm though so keep that in mind.
Thank you for your comment. Really appreciate it.
Thanks God you know that the aperture changes by/with crop factor.
I like your photography reviews, cheers!
Thanks for watching 😊👍
Dude...the 18-55 is SUPERIOR to a lot of other lenses. Have you ACTUALLY tried it? It's not a 5.6., btw...
I've tried my friend's XT3 and it is a great camera! Not denying that at all. But.........better than the A7III? In my opinion, absolutely not! Better autofocus and tracking, better in low light, and the image quality is amazing, not "decent" as you say. There are down sides to the A7III as there is with every camera but for me, having used both and an owner of two A7III's, I'd pick the A7III ten times out of ten. The XT3 is not that far behind though and a great camera for anyone to enjoy! Fujifilm is definitely making a statement that they are a force to be reckoned with!
It feels weird seeing him 'testing' the autofocus on the gokarts with AF-S or single point. It probably wouldve been better if he used AF-C, continuous.
Reason is because the lens was too long for the track, AF-C wasn’t able to hold as easy as AF-S since I had to manually track the karts. This is what i why I said it’s user error in the video
Great video. I’m Big fan OF Fujifilm. In the next Fuji video I recommand to use the great small and practical kit Lens the Fujinon XF 18-55 F2.8. Great AF and images from it are superb
Thanks! Will check out that lens in the future
How much difference would you say there is in th "shooting experience" between the xt3 and the hx1? Is the actual functioning of the hx1 pretty similar to the xt3?
Haven’t tried the XH1 to compare but I’m guessing the experience will be similar. Fujifilm does a good job of keeping a familiarity to their camera lineup
if the a73 did not come out I would have gotten the xt2 or the t2 because one it would be cheaper and have more in the budget to get those primes and some zoom lens; but since I have the a73 buying another system would not benefit me since I am a little invested in the Sony ecosystem, yet if I got the a6400 then it would be good but I have full frame lens. i am telling my friends and family who are starting to get into photography to start with Fuji because this day and age, everyone wants that "film" look and FujiFilm made the film so there is that.
Thanks for watching. Yes it’s hard to switch after investing in the Sony System. I would stick to the A73 vs a6400. Also the crop factor and lens size will throw off the balance of the a6400
@@TECH360TV big facts and since I primarily shoot photos that full frame goodness is unmatched unless medium format but for that kind of money I can get the holy trinity and maybe some primes.
What do you think of that upcoming X Pro 3? Leica M10 D for cheap?
Looks interesting, and I like the way Fujifilm is kind of hiding the screen but will need to see how it works when shooting with the camera
That's the reason I shoot Fuji and not Sony. Sony cameras are soulless. I love the things Fuji bring to the table too - like the film emulation, but I'd rather not walk around with a PlayStation with a lens on it strapped to me. So, Sony? Never.
Nicholas Kellingley my sentiments exactly. Sony has such a sterile, “clinical” look. I didn’t know how else to put it. I debated between the Sony a7 and Fuji xt1 when I got my first mirrorless. I disliked the Sony look in spite of its full-frame capability. I now shoot on an xt3 and love it.
Shooting sports in AF-S??
I've got both. Use the Fuji for video and personal photography. Use the Sony as a b cam and commercial photography.
Exactly! For video fuji is better for photo I prefer Sony (for paid gig)
Why you prefer for video xt3?
A7iii has better AF, good colors and custom profiles for video
@@LandsPlanes image quality is just better with the XT3. 10 bit color is a game changer, 400mbps helps even more and 4k 60p is like icing on the cake.
Overall the XT3 shine especially in challenging scenarios over the A7iii
@@7evive there are any web to compare that two cameras?
@@LandsPlanes I don't know but I've tried both and worked with both files in video editing software.
BMPCC4k >XT3 > A7iii (for video)
XF16-55 is about the same as FF 24-82 f4.2, Why shouldn't I get a common 24-105 f4 on FF?
Big heavy ugly full frame. Plus Sony ergonics suck. Fujibcaneras are fun to use, canin, don't and Nikon suck at the fun to use catagory.
@@airgliderz Here is a size comparison between XT3w/Xf1655 and A7IIIw/24105G: j.mp/2SJNYez
They are about the same size and look, while A7III has a larger grip( a welcome change on XH1). I found the ergonomics of XT3 is not great at all because of the tiny grip. But I guess it is fun to use because of the dials.
Not all people want a shallow dof. With this u youll have f2.8 with a dof of f4 which migh be advantageous to some person shooting in low light
@@mrinsaf But Fuji APSC loses at least 1 stop of ISO performance. Which means, NO. You get almost the same result with f4 on FF vs f2.8 on APSC.
@@cks7249clearly haven't taken photos on a Fuji o suggest you rent both and get your opinion with your own receipts rather than basing you opinions on what the internet says.
Thanks for the video. I came for the 200mm! I would not skip the "kit lens". It is excellent performance for the price when purchased with the body and blows other kit lenses that I have used away. It is also the least expensive way to get XF OIS if you want to get going with handheld video. I prefer the images from the older primes over the f2s and particularly love the 35 1.4 as a walk around. But I dont get to play in the rain with it.
I wonder if the issue you had with tracking on the 200 had more to do with having face detection on (at least in the clip of the karts you showed)? I know my XT3 can sometimes get a little wonky when there are no faces (without helmets) in the scene. Why are you converting aperture when discussing FF equivalence. It sounds wrong and people are going to get grumpy.
Thanks for watching.
Tracking with the 200 was difficult I believe due to the lens being too Long for the track with the teleconverter on it. I tried many different modes before settling on the one in the video. This was user error 💯. No knowing the track a 100+ would be much better.
I shot with the kit lens but didn’t find it outstanding. Perhaps on video it’s better but it was okay only. I feel a good kit lens should be fast enough for night and day photos.
As for the converting of numbers, some don’t like it, but there is a difference from full frame.
I noticed with many of your shots you weren’t shooting with the 180 degree shutter rule, I’m assuming it’s because you were trying to compensate for the lack of light but without stabilization, it doesn’t pan out well even with the steadiest of hands. I was tempted by fujifilm when this camera released but I like to be versatile and be able to shoot in any condition and keep my images clean and without grain as much as I can and that means going full frame and I can’t go back now. Thanks for the review !
Fuji xt3 kit lens is 18-55 f2.8-f4 …. & it's a beautiful lens for new users
Understand but I preferred the 16-55 especially for lower light situations.
@@TECH360TV yeah .. absolutely .. no doubt about it , but just take care of that don't misinform others .. like you said that the kit lens is f5.6 … which isn't true at all …
It is more like a commercial than a decent review. Although it is a relatively good camera.The battery is not ‘pretty decent’ it is the obvious weakness. Likewise the low light performance.
Sorry you felt that way. This is not a commercial for the XT3. As mentioned the battery grip is necessary or extra batteries for all day filming and photography. Low light is comparable to other cameras, but the lens has a lot to do with that. Faster lens produces better low light shots.
That 200m F2 lens is a beast. Basically F3 and 300m for Full Frame🎉🎉🔥🔥🔥
It’s such an amazing lens to shoot with.
Xt3 is a good camera, but there is no way in hell, that it is better than the a7iii
Is the Fuji better than the Sony? Personally I don’t like the analog style dials. Shot film for 40 years and I’m sick of them. Don’t get me wrong I think the Fuji is a great camera but it’s not everyone’s cup of tea. I went from Canon FF to Sony FF and I like the advantages of FF so aps-c is not going to cut it. I do think the GFX series looks very interesting however. Comparing the Fuji and Sony is like apples and oranges to me. If you compare this camera to say the Sony a6400 that would be more like it. The focusing on the a6400 is pretty hard to beat though. I did enjoy your video and presentation but I’m not sold on what camera is “better”. After all it’s the photographer that makes the magic happen.
Appreciate the reply and understand your points.
I also prefer full frame but enjoy the versatility the XT3 offers for the price. Up to 30 Fps burst mode, film profiles (some like this some don’t), better 4K recording etc.
As I said in the video, the A7III does a lot of things right, but I enjoyed the feel and usability of the Fujifilm more.
Yes and I agree with your last sentence 💯
Even the best camera in the world won’t make you a better photographer.
Depends on sensor size and lenes
luis santana No.
True, so true. But that bad ass 90mm 1.8 is a beast. I love my camera. But I can shoot with ANY camera. You definitely miss the upgrades when you pick up some bullshit...like the Fuji kml
Hi - I love shooting my XT3 - I have access to an A7iii as well. Both are awesome but I actually enjoy the Fuji more. However on your go kart section you mention focus tracking - but you are shooting in AFS not AFC (at least on the video shown) so it doesn't do moving object focus tracking in that AFS mode. AFC would have tracked the kart much better.
It was having an issue due to the lens being too Long for the track so I had to switch.
thank you very much, that video helps me alot with my choice 🙏
The problem with the nose is no problem, because you can disable the side of the touchscreen controls where the nose touch. left or right side.
I have a bigger nose too. I just bought the Fujifilm X-T1 extended eyepiece (Long Eyecup) and swap it and it works perfectly from nose contact with the screen.
Just spent a day photographing Rallycross with the XT3 and the 200mm f2. I find the shutter button to be too close to the overall slim downed body. Unlike most other cameras the shutter release is not located further forward and on a separate bulb part of the camera moulding. In my view this detracts from the general handling of the camera. The pricing of the 200mm is just £1,000 less than the Holy Grail of all lenses - the Canon 300mm f2.8. I don't understand the reasoning behind this - and of course the Bokeh can't match this on a FF camera body. The slimmed down camera body coupled with such a large lens is a questionable mix.
need to upgrade to the xt3, better for video than the a73, 4k 60fps ....maaaayne
Yes video capabilities are better
Which cameras did you shot this review video with
GH5
@@TECH360TV and which lens please
Sigma 56 1.4 If is not mistaken
For the SLR styled Fuji cameras, I still enjoy using my X-H1 over my X-T3. There is a "feel" to the H1 that I cannot get with the T3 and I thoroughly love the H1's shutter mechanism. Once I got the 16-55, I started to wonder why I did not get that lens sooner. In the process, I have all the 1.x primes so I guess that is a bonus for waiting so long to get the 16-55. :p
I think you needed to spend more time on the tracking AF. When I use the T3 with a selected wide tracking area (compared to what appeared as single focus point) and use one of the tracking presets I can normally get a majority of action shots I'm trying to capture. Enjoyed the video. :)
Hi Martin thanks for the comment. Haven’t tried the H1 yet but perhaps in the future.
As for the tracking, the Lens was far too long so I had to change the focus point to work correctly.
User error 💯.
Thanks for watching. Much appreciated
If its not full frame... im off this train!! If you make prints .. full frame makes all the difference!! ... now if your mainly posting pics or just having them on your ipad... then im sure the fuji is great...
Curious, can you not make nice, full-size prints with the Fuji just because of the smaller sensor? Isn't it still fully capable?
nice to see my home country showcased by youtubers
The a7iii the gold standard to which all others aspire.. says it all really!
daen brown - Not everyone’s gold standard
Love the video and really appreciate the great info. I do wanna say your like a cross of Timothy Olyphant and Michael Franzese, which is a compliment.
Thank you 😊😊
Yes will be buying this fuji after all, the sony a7iii is my 1st choice of upgrade but it is not made in Japan that why i switch to Fujifilm camera TX3. Agreed with you on that len 16-55mm f2.8 my kind of shooting range for APSC.
The kit lens is a F2.8-4 which also has OIS, it's not a 5.6.
16-50 3.5 -5.6
@@TECH360TV No sir. That's the XC lens. The Kit lens that comes with the XT3 is the 18-55 2.8-4. Look it up if you care.
Correction on our written reply. We were referring to the 18-55 kit lens.
I like fuji, I have an xt-2 that I love and I use it exclusively for photography ... but sony is a step ahead with everything (I know that because I own also a a6600 and a a7sII)
Why fuji user compare this camera with a ff one? You shouldn’t be doing this comparition with a crop sensor one?
Very professional, natural and slick presentation. I have the XT-2. Such temptation. (But sad that you shot so many animals. Isn't that illegal ? 😏)
Thanks for watching. Disclaimer: No animals were harmed during my camera testing 😂😂
@Ziggi Mon going by spec the X-T3 should have the edge over the X-T2 in photos and video. I have the X-T2 but thinking of going to the X-T3 or a Panasonic g9 with Leica lens both cameras do 4k at 60fps.
I really like the old school dials on this camera to change the settings much better than the menu driven interface Sony utilizes for their cameras (I currently have an RX V100 and I dont like that aspect of it) . I think the Fuji would be much better in this regard, buI think I may get an AIII. I want to do low light photos and video as well as landscape astrophotography so I think the full frame Sony would be a better fit for me.
You can take great photos with both cameras, depends on what you enjoy using more
You really need to quit converting aperture, as that only matters in terms of DOF ... it is the same no matter the format when it comes to light gathering. SO for night shooting, 1.4 is 1.4 on APSC or FF ... gets really boring watching reviewers state the 'equivalence' every 2 minutes - also do more research, the Fuji 'kit' lens is 2.8 - 4 and is very decent
Yes cause light gathering is measured in T stops not F stop
Nope 1.4 is F2 is full frame
@@TheMPTV no, it isn't unless you watch way too much tony Northcorrupt. The light you can make use of is exactly the same
@@Cagey7531 Sorry you are text reading, i see the difference between a FF and Crop when using their respectively lens in aperture. I see a depth of field and exposure difference, but nowadays because of technology its very close but you can still see the difference
@@TheMPTV being a dickhead doesn't make you right. You get the same light hitting the sensor whether you like it or not.
How do you feel it compares to the A7RIII? Which would you say is better and why?
A7RIII IQ is very impressive especially the dynamic range. I wouldn’t compare that to the XT3 as they are different cameras really. I’ve gotten some great images from the Sony when paired with the right lenses.
How big of a difference between X-T1 and X-T3?
Autofocus is faster, video is non started on the xt1, immense on xt3. That said, I’m selling my xt3 and keeping my xt1, love them both but I don’t crop much so 16mp works fine, also do mainly landscape so don’t miss better autofocus. Xt1 is still great!
Tools manufacturers always manufacture new modified tools. But only the person who uses those tools, knows which tool is for him and what he can do with it.
what'd u film this with? lol, now thats a camera :')
Calculation skills aren't that strong in this one ... *scnr*
my man looks like an adult film actor
Very much enjoy your reviews. Hope you do a GFX 100 review someday with some of their lenses
Thank you
Working on that :). Thanks for watching!
One of the best camera review channels on the planet right now. 👍🏻
Thanks for watching and the kind words
Switched after ten years from Canon to Fuji. And I love it. The photos from fuji all better than from my Canon APS C cameras.Canon has missed the last few years too much. But the lightroom workflow sucks
Fuji nails it with the APS-C systems
Use Capture 1 and you will be surprised.
Can you use Nikon lenses on it with af
I have an a7r3 and an xe3.I love them both
A7RIII is a fantastic camera. Congrats
Fantastic review, well done.
Thanks Henry!
If You ask if the Fujifilm XT-3 is better than the SONY A7III - that is hard to judge. Each camera has its streghts and asking such questions is a bit tricky. But if You really want to compare the color science, sensitivity, sharpness, etc, You can look at the comparometer at Imaging Resource and the answer is clear. SONY A7III is sharper at every ISO and delivers far more detail, even if it has little less megapixels. There are Canon cameras, like the 5D MkIV. which has much more megapixels and still it delivers less details than the SONY A7III. And the noise levels? SONY is better. And the color rendition? I think both are excellent and none of them is really better. That is my experience.
I love that lens omg it reminds me of my sigma 105 1.4.
in body stabilization is already a no go for xt3 on video and picture! if had the money will like to have both cameras just to experience the xt3 film classic
its a shame that reviewers of the X-T3 lack a basic understanding of how ISO is calibrated. ISO is not a true measurement in the sense its an industry standard, but is relative, Canon, Sony and Nikon use the REI standard and Fuji use the SOS standard that is considered more objective. When these standards are aligned the Fuji's IOS is relatively higher at a given IOS than the other manufacturers meaning the Fuji's ISO performance is nearly identical (approximately within half a stop) in performance vs the Sony. Again, this is the case of camera makers using dodgy settings to fool the public into believing that a camera has an high ISO when in fact the improvement is in the markings on the dial rather than actual sensor improvement.
Thanks for the comment, but also realise that what you wrote here won’t be understood by most who just come to watch and learn if the camera is good or not. We keep things simple here. There are other channels love to get into the math and calculations. We don’t here at this time.
On a side note, Merry Christmas!
The X-T3 is great but it has limitations in stills for professional shooting. You can't compare an APS-C with a FF sensor. It just can't touch the HDR and low light performance of the Sony a7III. No IS in body neither on the best basic zoom lens 16-55mm f/2.8. For APS-C is a superb choice (maybe top) but who can afford the XF 200mm f/2??? You go from $1900 which is the most "affordable" XF lens (100-400mm) to $6000!!! There's a huge gap over there...
That 200 is very subtle. Almost stealthy. lol
It’s my preferred street lens as I just disappear in the crowds 😂
I found the the information on the 18-55 misleading as many other people here. Especially considering the price, the 18-55 is a beautiful piece of glass and will make 90% of the people very happy. Of course the 16-55 is superior in many ways, but its also a lot pricier. Well, it has become quite obvious for me that you target those of us that are willing to spend thousands of dollars and I guess we shouldn't be expecting budget tips from you. But saying that the "kit lens", which is the XF18-5mm f2.8-4, is not a good deal, is flat out wrong for the majority of people. Also, as I'm reading through the comments with your replies, you seem to justify yourself about the kit lens. Just a tip: it's not as bad as you think to admit once in while when you're wrong. Have a good day!
I do admit when I’m wrong but these are my opinions. You may disagree with me and that’s fine. I’m open to discussion but because I believe in something different than you doesn’t require me to admit I’m wrong. There is not right or wrong answer in photography. Everyone has their own thoughts etc.
@@TECH360TV I agree with you on that one. Yet I still think that for the majority of people the 18-55 2.8-4 kit lens is a great recommendation. But then I guess we agree to disagree. But let's not forget that we're all here for the love of Fuji, so enjoy shooting!
I agree we are here because we like Fuji and what they are doing. Reason sometimes I recommend higher priced lenses (not always but sometimes) is that time and time again I get questions about why do I have so much noise in my photos, why are my pics in Low light not so good, why aren’t my pictures sharp. Sometimes this is user error and sometimes they choose the least expensive lens only to find out that it limits how they want to shoot and capture images. The XT3 isn’t the best with Low light performance and some
Complain about this. So I recommend the f2.8 to save them money in the long run. If they buy a cheap lens and try to sell it they can loose a lot in the process and end up spending more money than the higher priced one.
There are exceptions to the rule but this happens a lot.
In terms of budget friendly lenses I love the Z Mount 1.8 lenses. They are sharp, great bokeh and great colors for affordable prices. I also feel the same about the Sony 1.8 lenses too.
I dont agree with you with the battery grip , just bring the batteries much smaller
No prob. We all have our preferences.
well,i have a7iii with Tamron 28 75 2.8 and i think its very good combination!
i research for gimbal those days! check if you like my last video in very dark place,hammam exactly!
Hmm, I thought the 16-55 was a kit lense.. Confused 🙄
Biggest issue I have for extreme travel photography (I travel all over the world on either a motorcycle or hiking) in dust mostly, the 35 and 50 equiv 1.4 lenses are not weatherproof. Whyyyyyy? So stupid. I own a X-T3 as backup and a A7RIII which is my go to camera. But I'm thinking of selling the X-T3 for a A7III because it is stabilized and the lenses are weatherproof. Has anybody had experience with getting the 23 and 35 1.4 lenses and 56 1.2 in dusty and rainy environments?
Be careful in wet weather with the A7III. Some of the lenses might be okay, but Sony isn’t great on the weather sealing yet. I’m guessing the new versions in the future will be.
Btw like the A7RIII, perhaps my favourite Sony
I am guessing the lens mount has been bent, holding the camera with one hand and that huge lens attachted???
No 😊
@@TECH360TV lucky you.....
I can tell you from experience that it might happen cause it happened to me.
@@oliverlison Not all mounts are created equal. There is a video around showing the strength of an XT mount vs A7. Sony seems pretty brittle.
But yeah I would use two hands specially since its not my camera!
@@felixtheengine any lens that is heavier than 600gr I would support with two hands. My heaviest lens is a 24-70 2.8.... But I somehow damage the mount. Maybe knocking camera/lens combo onto something..... I don't have Sony
I own an xt3 and used to own a Sony. Fujifilm is great and I'm very happy with it but Sony is a different monster. There's levels and Sony is on top.
I like Sony’s other camera’s like the A7R series and A9, but feel at a 2k price point the fujifilm has better video, and the photography aspect appealed to me more
Hey , I enjoyed the content but I think you underplayed the image quality of this vs a7iii. For some one looking to take sharp and quality photos, isn’t the Sony FF systems cheaper than Fuji APSC?
Thanks for watching. Sharp photos doesn’t mean it’s better. I can put a Zeiss Otus on a camera and get sharp photos. It’s about the whole package. The feel, Color science etc. Sony makes a great camera. I have taken some great pics with Sony cameras, just like the feel of the Fujifilm.
TECH360.TV thanks for replying . Appreciate that.
Does the 16-55 lense have OIS?
Allen Schneider - It doesn’t have OIS