I’m curious, during the second game when you summers fall-ed the 10k you had tunic up so you could’ve thrown Zealous and the Summer’s fall. Your opponent wouldn’t have known you had Summers in a real game so why not throw the 5 and take cards or shields from them?
The most defensive deck shouldn’t also be one of the highest damage decks. Maybe they can make it so the attacker picks the order of ward targets like with allies or whatever
Techs deck SUPER HARD to beat enigma. Showcases that it still loses. Lol. Zero shade intended, i just find it to be a hilarious juxtaposition and sums up my opinion on the match up. Jarl feels pretty dead on arrival competitively speaking untill at least enigma is out. Then you still have Nuu to worry about. Ironically i think the Nuu match up is much more Techable for Jarl.
There was never a world where a non-starvo guardian would have a good matchup into Enigma, so it isn't surprising. The best way to build Jarl is to just build him to be proactive to his intended strengths, with some variable tech for enigma via a go-wide package, then just pray you avoid them at events lol. But it isn't necessarily a bad thing, because Jarl will still be the "rock" in the rock-paper-scissors meta who will take care of aggro, while folding to illusionist. It'll be a nice meta balance even if the matchup is a bye (even though it unfortunately still feels bad for us guardian players)
@RandomParty1 I personally don't think playing a deck that can still lose to agro while having an 20-80 match up that will likely be in every top 8 is a viable deck. At least not personally when I consider 'viable' to mean reasonably able to win a top tier event.
How good do you think vambrace is in general for Jarl? Is it just this specific deck that runs it? Or do you think Jarl will want this into Enigma for any iteration of the deck?
Its funny how Jarl would be a much better deck if HO wouldnt have gotten a ban. I think Jarl should be overall favoured into DIO, and DIO herself could reduce the Enigma population. Anyways, wonderful showcase of Jarl here. My locals has a few good Enigmas, so i will definetly stay away from Jarl for the time being.
i definitely think enigma was winnable with tech until they shifted to the 10k builds, i think its pretty hopeless for jarl until the deck shifts again
cut through the facade in jarl crushes enigma
love the content
“We made a mistake…”
I’m curious, during the second game when you summers fall-ed the 10k you had tunic up so you could’ve thrown Zealous and the Summer’s fall. Your opponent wouldn’t have known you had Summers in a real game so why not throw the 5 and take cards or shields from them?
yeah thats definitely a better line, good catch! i still get smoked by the restless but thats a much smoother line
The most defensive deck shouldn’t also be one of the highest damage decks. Maybe they can make it so the attacker picks the order of ward targets like with allies or whatever
I don't think jarl should run cnc, I think the earth/ice card number dilema is solved by not running it
yeah honestly since were given the privilage of ice and earth lets depend on the elements for once just like we did with oldhim
Techs deck SUPER HARD to beat enigma. Showcases that it still loses. Lol. Zero shade intended, i just find it to be a hilarious juxtaposition and sums up my opinion on the match up. Jarl feels pretty dead on arrival competitively speaking untill at least enigma is out. Then you still have Nuu to worry about. Ironically i think the Nuu match up is much more Techable for Jarl.
There was never a world where a non-starvo guardian would have a good matchup into Enigma, so it isn't surprising. The best way to build Jarl is to just build him to be proactive to his intended strengths, with some variable tech for enigma via a go-wide package, then just pray you avoid them at events lol. But it isn't necessarily a bad thing, because Jarl will still be the "rock" in the rock-paper-scissors meta who will take care of aggro, while folding to illusionist. It'll be a nice meta balance even if the matchup is a bye (even though it unfortunately still feels bad for us guardian players)
@RandomParty1 I personally don't think playing a deck that can still lose to agro while having an 20-80 match up that will likely be in every top 8 is a viable deck. At least not personally when I consider 'viable' to mean reasonably able to win a top tier event.
Yet ppl thought that Jarl would be stronger than Oldhim.🤣
I seriously cannot wait for Enigma to LL, MST was a mistake.
I wish that they banned it. Just a broken card with minimal counterplay.
How good do you think vambrace is in general for Jarl? Is it just this specific deck that runs it? Or do you think Jarl will want this into Enigma for any iteration of the deck?
its probably worth playing in any iteration of jarl into enigma that doesnt run summit in the matchup
its an auto-loss, don't even bother, at least have some fun with the mangles.
Its funny how Jarl would be a much better deck if HO wouldnt have gotten a ban. I think Jarl should be overall favoured into DIO, and DIO herself could reduce the Enigma population.
Anyways, wonderful showcase of Jarl here. My locals has a few good Enigmas, so i will definetly stay away from Jarl for the time being.
i definitely think enigma was winnable with tech until they shifted to the 10k builds, i think its pretty hopeless for jarl until the deck shifts again