China's decision to disengage from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in 2020, following the 2019 clashes, can be attributed to several factors: *Geopolitical Considerations:* 1. BRICS Summit: China sought to ease tensions before hosting the BRICS Summit in 2020, showcasing its ability to manage regional conflicts. 2. Rapprochement with India: China aimed to improve ties with India, a vital partner in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO). 3. US-China Trade War: China sought to divert attention from its trade tensions with the US by demonstrating cooperation with other major powers. *Strategic Calculations:* 1. Avoidance of Escalation: China recognized the risk of further escalation, potentially drawing in other nations or sparking a broader conflict. 2. Economic Interests: China prioritized protecting its significant economic investments in India, particularly in the tech and infrastructure sectors. 3. Military Readiness: China may have assessed its military preparedness and decided to disengage to avoid revealing vulnerabilities. *Diplomatic Efforts:* 1. Wuhan Spirit: China revisited the "Wuhan Spirit" agreement (2018) with India, emphasizing cooperation and mutual understanding. 2. Backchannel Diplomacy: Intensive diplomatic efforts, including secret talks, helped resolve the standoff. 3. Russia's Mediation: Russia, a key player in the SCO, may have facilitated negotiations between China and India. *Domestic Factors:* 1. COVID-19 Pandemic: China faced internal challenges managing the pandemic, diverting resources and attention from external conflicts. 2. Economic Pressures: China's economy faced slowdown concerns, making it essential to maintain stability and avoid additional stressors. *Key Outcomes:* 1. Disengagement Agreement: China and India agreed to disengage troops from contested areas. 2. Border Talks: Regular border talks resumed to resolve outstanding issues. 3. Enhanced Diplomatic Engagement: China and India strengthened diplomatic ties, including visits by high-ranking officials. While China's decision to disengage from the LAC in 2020 was likely driven by a combination of these factors, tensions between China and India remain, and the situation continues to evolve.
The BRICS is the last hope to the vulnerable population in both Africa and Middle East. The political structures and economic strategies are constantly attack by Israeli under the influence of USA and UK. The reason behind is to weaken trade and lower economic growth in the north East. The Brics should also look on the protection of those groups in terms of politics and life as well. The West set up their campaign to destroy economic sources in the north to maintain their superiority in trade and economy. The Brics must extend its diplomatic relations to East Africa. That will help sublining Western trade and strengthen Brics membership. At the same time, air defences in Brics countries must be improved to set the balance of power. The courage, unity and determination when doing things will help Brics achieve it's goals. As you have seen and witness the constant down fall of UN which serves the interest of its western masters especially USA and UK. It can not condemn the on going genocide in MIDLEAST by Israel and USA. They deliberately killing people who can file a court case against all the on going atrocities. It is clearly and absolutely right to remember the words of the late Ibrahim Raisi, may his soul rest in peace, that Israel can not stop genocide without the use of collective force. Look where the situation is going today. Strong measures must be put in place.
Ukraine’s unwavering spirit is a beacon guiding the world through these dark times.
China's decision to disengage from the Line of Actual Control (LAC) in 2020, following the 2019 clashes, can be attributed to several factors:
*Geopolitical Considerations:*
1. BRICS Summit: China sought to ease tensions before hosting the BRICS Summit in 2020, showcasing its ability to manage regional conflicts.
2. Rapprochement with India: China aimed to improve ties with India, a vital partner in BRICS and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO).
3. US-China Trade War: China sought to divert attention from its trade tensions with the US by demonstrating cooperation with other major powers.
*Strategic Calculations:*
1. Avoidance of Escalation: China recognized the risk of further escalation, potentially drawing in other nations or sparking a broader conflict.
2. Economic Interests: China prioritized protecting its significant economic investments in India, particularly in the tech and infrastructure sectors.
3. Military Readiness: China may have assessed its military preparedness and decided to disengage to avoid revealing vulnerabilities.
*Diplomatic Efforts:*
1. Wuhan Spirit: China revisited the "Wuhan Spirit" agreement (2018) with India, emphasizing cooperation and mutual understanding.
2. Backchannel Diplomacy: Intensive diplomatic efforts, including secret talks, helped resolve the standoff.
3. Russia's Mediation: Russia, a key player in the SCO, may have facilitated negotiations between China and India.
*Domestic Factors:*
1. COVID-19 Pandemic: China faced internal challenges managing the pandemic, diverting resources and attention from external conflicts.
2. Economic Pressures: China's economy faced slowdown concerns, making it essential to maintain stability and avoid additional stressors.
*Key Outcomes:*
1. Disengagement Agreement: China and India agreed to disengage troops from contested areas.
2. Border Talks: Regular border talks resumed to resolve outstanding issues.
3. Enhanced Diplomatic Engagement: China and India strengthened diplomatic ties, including visits by high-ranking officials.
While China's decision to disengage from the LAC in 2020 was likely driven by a combination of these factors, tensions between China and India remain, and the situation continues to evolve.
The BRICS is the last hope to the vulnerable population in both Africa and Middle East. The political structures and economic strategies are constantly attack by Israeli under the influence of USA and UK. The reason behind is to weaken trade and lower economic growth in the north East. The Brics should also look on the protection of those groups in terms of politics and life as well. The West set up their campaign to destroy economic sources in the north to maintain their superiority in trade and economy. The Brics must extend its diplomatic relations to East Africa. That will help sublining Western trade and strengthen Brics membership. At the same time, air defences in Brics countries must be improved to set the balance of power. The courage, unity and determination when doing things will help Brics achieve it's goals. As you have seen and witness the constant down fall of UN which serves the interest of its western masters especially USA and UK. It can not condemn the on going genocide in MIDLEAST by Israel and USA. They deliberately killing people who can file a court case against all the on going atrocities. It is clearly and absolutely right to remember the words of the late Ibrahim Raisi, may his soul rest in peace, that Israel can not stop genocide without the use of collective force. Look where the situation is going today. Strong measures must be put in place.