Consumer surplus introduction | Consumer and producer surplus | Microeconomics | Khan Academy

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 57

  • @shinchiwarrior
    @shinchiwarrior 10 років тому +252

    my head is going to explode

  • @backdraftvideos1180
    @backdraftvideos1180 9 років тому +29

    I didn't pay attention all year in Econ and I just learned the whole damn thing in like 30 minutes on Khan academy

  • @sherryfay9026
    @sherryfay9026 Рік тому +10

    I’m currently doing an MBA course and your videos have honestly helped me so much in getting to grips with the economics module. The explanations are so thorough and have been making it so much easier to wrap my head around the topics at hand. So grateful !

    • @figulapt3784
      @figulapt3784 Рік тому

      you are stupid if you are taking mba and cannot even self learn such basic concept

  • @Liljoozy
    @Liljoozy 11 років тому +40

    = "Khan academy offers higher utility per 60 seconds than 60 seconds of time in class."

  • @creasepi
    @creasepi 2 місяці тому

    This guy is such a good teacher. I am a fully online student at the moment and watch a lot of videos with multiple instructors. I'm always happy whenever it's his videos because I know I'll actually understand the concept.

  • @virgozero
    @virgozero 12 років тому +34

    1.) skip class
    2.) watch 10min vids from khan academy
    3.) Profit!?!??

    • @wedeldylan
      @wedeldylan 5 років тому +2

      Very true, classes are extremely inefficient when the concepts they put forth are this basic

  • @nyx_bts4992
    @nyx_bts4992 5 років тому +19

    I'm a law student at the first year but we have economic lessons too and my teacher is USELESS. Not to mention that we work with a quite advanced textbook (at least for us law students that don't want to deal that much with calculations). I was feeling so stupid because I couldn't understand the book, neither the problems but Khan Academy just saved me. These videos make me realize that I'm not stupid to understand economics, it's just that I need to have someone to explain things simply and carefully. THANK YOU KHAN ACADEMY❣

    • @vurtnesaerdna
      @vurtnesaerdna 7 місяців тому

      4 years has past, did you become a lawyer ?

  • @masokys
    @masokys 5 років тому +20

    Sal, how on earth do you have the motivation to learn so much!?

  • @alensaric1082
    @alensaric1082 6 років тому +22

    I can tell you I didn't get a consumer surplus by signing up for this class

  • @Quickonomics
    @Quickonomics 4 роки тому +15

    This is a good introduction. For those who need more information on how to calculate consumer surplus, we have created an additional step-by-step tutorial on our channel.

  • @paula2001-c5m
    @paula2001-c5m 3 роки тому +7

    why is there a consumer surplus (gain on the side of the consumer) if they've paid 60 000 for a products which's price is 30 000?

    • @williamkane1333
      @williamkane1333 3 роки тому +3

      i also confuse, i suppose it have to be a gain for the seller side right ?

    • @KrishnenduJ-hc5fg
      @KrishnenduJ-hc5fg 2 роки тому +3

      60,000 is how much they value the good; at equilibrium they end up paying only 30,000. So there's a gain of 30,000!

  • @eltonjohnsonhlabano
    @eltonjohnsonhlabano 7 років тому +1

    I AM LOVING THIS ITS REALLY HELPFUL THANX

  • @TheBlankThought
    @TheBlankThought 11 років тому +5

    My final is today for economics. Please save me Khan.

    • @brendanm7059
      @brendanm7059 6 років тому +1

      How did that final go

    • @simoncopeland
      @simoncopeland 5 років тому +2

      @@brendanm7059 asked 5 years later hahaha

  • @Drutzie
    @Drutzie 13 років тому +2

    Thank u so much for your service......you've been a life saver

  • @huiwen3938
    @huiwen3938 3 роки тому +2

    Is marginal benefit = consumer surplus and can we use the term interchangeably?

  • @terrell0011
    @terrell0011 9 років тому +9

    Which video came before this one an which comes after? I'm kind of confused..

    • @ACoTMify
      @ACoTMify 4 роки тому +1

      Before is marginal benefit and after is producer surplus.

    • @nanyamishra
      @nanyamishra 4 роки тому

      @@ACoTMify Bro! Had you been here 5 years ago, he would not have left the course.

  • @MustafaHammood
    @MustafaHammood 11 років тому +3

    hey khan could you please link to the next and previous video your videos series, it gets kinda confusing.
    thanks

  • @afonsogranja9645
    @afonsogranja9645 2 роки тому +1

    thanks for your video

  • @ConnerVain
    @ConnerVain Рік тому +1

    Anything that will propel towards graduation and a better life.

  • @amansrivastava8978
    @amansrivastava8978 7 років тому +6

    Didn't understand this part at all, somebody please explain.

    • @mythofreadiness2213
      @mythofreadiness2213 6 років тому +1

      The next is total consumer surplus, hello from 2018.

    • @azrieldaffawibowo9105
      @azrieldaffawibowo9105 5 років тому +1

      @@mythofreadiness2213 oh I see, thank you from 2019

    • @vikyathshetty9770
      @vikyathshetty9770 3 роки тому +1

      @@azrieldaffawibowo9105 thats intresting thank you from 2021

    • @kaushik.s7255
      @kaushik.s7255 Рік тому +1

      @@vikyathshetty9770 2021, that's cool. Thank you from 2023

  • @yatharth-lk7fq
    @yatharth-lk7fq Рік тому

    excellant

  • @hugodsa89
    @hugodsa89 13 років тому

    @khanacademy again sorry, our should we look at the slope of the demand curve, until it reaches a points or the marginal benefit is still positive, until it reaches a stationary point?

  • @Sparksy
    @Sparksy Рік тому

    Im so confused on why the consumer surplus is 60k meaning they got that much more in benefit. To me it sounds like theyre overpaying it?why is this a benefit?why is it a "consumer surplus" if it's the seller getting more $?
    So confused.

  • @MrGiTag
    @MrGiTag 13 років тому

    make some advanced function video

  • @gdogvibes1
    @gdogvibes1 12 років тому

    They overpaid more than they needed to for a perceived 'marginal benefit' in respect to their value of the car.

  • @max12345678904
    @max12345678904 13 років тому

    @jappanpreeti nope, it's not.

  • @hugodsa89
    @hugodsa89 13 років тому

    @khanacademy if we take into account what is our costs of production and produce just enough so we can pay ourselves, wouldn't it be the best a welfare society? or apply it to companies owned by the governments, so generate a higher welfare

  • @ckreeder
    @ckreeder 13 років тому

    @hugodsa89 Prices determine costs. If you arbitrarily decide what your costs will be (just enough to pay ourselves, you say) society will be more poor. Note how government produces things and costs are incurred to produce those things, but no one buys or sells them. Instead they are paid with taxes. Whereas the marketplace determines prices through buying and not-buying things. Note also government is brutally inefficient but market is gloriously efficient. There is a connection.

  • @nowtone9838
    @nowtone9838 2 роки тому

    Easy to understand but feels like incomplete information

  • @rahrahritaa
    @rahrahritaa 12 років тому

    good thing i'm not procrastinating because i have no idea wtf this is.

  • @justsomegirlwithoutamustac5837
    @justsomegirlwithoutamustac5837 5 років тому

    I love you sal

  • @AnuAnu-e7l
    @AnuAnu-e7l Місяць тому

    I can't take this much of American English 😢 my brain couldn't not found the proper words

  • @noumanshar3071
    @noumanshar3071 2 роки тому +1

    😩🤯🤯

  • @lokeshtattukolla3303
    @lokeshtattukolla3303 2 роки тому

    hs 232

  • @max12345678904
    @max12345678904 13 років тому

    first