This part went into production with a drawing used for inspection of critical-to-function features. The part geometry was used for the tooling. There is no need for a drawing describing that blend. At most, the print might specify inspection points, or maybe present cross-section views define the 2D contour for template gages. If you know how to do a drawing, you already know how to do that stuff.
@@IcanCwhatUsay Everything released for manufacture will have a drawing with inspection dimensions, tolerancing, revision control, material/finish specs, etc. etc. etc. The overwhelming number of vendors we deal with don't need drawings to fully define cast and molded parts. I can't think of even one. Other processes, like sheetmetal, powdered metal, extrusions - the 3D is sometimes not used because they prefer the 2D
he blended the convex fillet into the convave fillet
he had a solid body and turned it into a solid body
Cool...now do a video on how to make a drawing for that feature.
This part went into production with a drawing used for inspection of critical-to-function features. The part geometry was used for the tooling. There is no need for a drawing describing that blend.
At most, the print might specify inspection points, or maybe present cross-section views define the 2D contour for template gages. If you know how to do a drawing, you already know how to do that stuff.
@@DiMonteGroupInc Not sure what world you live in but the world I live in, I need a drawing for everything
@@IcanCwhatUsay Everything released for manufacture will have a drawing with inspection dimensions, tolerancing, revision control, material/finish specs, etc. etc. etc.
The overwhelming number of vendors we deal with don't need drawings to fully define cast and molded parts. I can't think of even one.
Other processes, like sheetmetal, powdered metal, extrusions - the 3D is sometimes not used because they prefer the 2D
"concave to congex blend"