Magic Hexagon - Numberphile

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 4 жов 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 812

  • @SpeeDim
    @SpeeDim 10 років тому +553

    I just love James Grime

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  10 років тому +93

      SpeeDim so do we!

    • @andrew_cunningham
      @andrew_cunningham 10 років тому +15

      There's just something about him, isn't there...

    • @uselesssanity
      @uselesssanity 9 років тому +6

      Andrew Cunningham perhaps its his little professor

    • @gavs928
      @gavs928 9 років тому +12

      maybe it's just because he's British and I'm not, but he seems like he'd make a great doctor who

    • @alfredomoreno8516
      @alfredomoreno8516 8 років тому +10

      Yes he conveys so much enthusiam

  • @superj1e2z6
    @superj1e2z6 8 років тому +922

    At least it is not a Parker hexagon

  • @elwynbrooks
    @elwynbrooks 9 років тому +123

    His enthusiasm makes me so happy :D

  • @CompoundInterest-SG
    @CompoundInterest-SG 10 років тому +49

    James Grime is so great. I always know it is going to be good when it is a video with him.

  • @sethgrasse9082
    @sethgrasse9082 7 років тому +186

    That size 1 magic hexagon blew my mind

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo 4 роки тому +23

      Yeah,not to mention the rigorous proof that it is indeed magical

    • @yusuf-5531
      @yusuf-5531 4 роки тому +19

      He didn't mention that an n=0 hexagon also works

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo 4 роки тому +15

      @@yusuf-5531 diagonals in n=0 hexagon aren't well defined so it is way too hard of a proof for this video

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex Рік тому

      ??

  • @AlanKey86
    @AlanKey86 10 років тому +423

    Does anyone have wood?
    I'll give you 2 wheat for 1 wood...

    • @CraftQueenJr
      @CraftQueenJr 6 років тому +10

      AlanKey86 yep, do you have 1 sheep? I’ll give you two wood.

    • @Maninawig
      @Maninawig 5 років тому +2

      Awkward for any guy to hear.... Odd glances everywhere

    • @MisterHunterWolf
      @MisterHunterWolf 5 років тому +13

      *rolls seven*

    • @jacobr7729
      @jacobr7729 5 років тому +2

      But I have all the ore....

    • @TrimutiusToo
      @TrimutiusToo 4 роки тому +3

      I have wood for sheep

  • @swarm9582
    @swarm9582 10 років тому +29

    Thank you for being colorblind friendly in the animation because I had no idea what you were talking about with the shape grouping until that point.

    • @wolfiksk123
      @wolfiksk123 10 років тому +1

      What does it look like. You can only see... Gray? Ha?! No? :(

    • @steinardarri
      @steinardarri 10 років тому +4

      wolfiksk123 It he means that the red and blue ones look too similar

    • @SnakeBiteScares
      @SnakeBiteScares 10 років тому +11

      steinardarri Not exactly, it depends on what type of colorblindness he has, I myself am colorblind and found it difficult to distinguish the blue and the pink. Colorblindness is where you find it difficult to distinguish between certain colors

  • @Maninawig
    @Maninawig 5 років тому +30

    8:33 When you're a Maths teacher and your student asks you to prove why 1+1=2

  • @vsauce4678
    @vsauce4678 5 років тому +14

    This guy has so much passion for what he loves and it shows in his videos

  • @firstnamelastname-oy7es
    @firstnamelastname-oy7es 9 років тому +77

    Incredible! It looks like all the other Hexagons have Hexa... _Gone_!!!
    I'm sorry for that.

    • @thisisrtsthree9992
      @thisisrtsthree9992 9 років тому +2

      +Bungis Albondigas shame

    • @thepip3599
      @thepip3599 8 років тому +2

      Sometimes I really wish there was a facepalm emoji. Just, so, so much.

    • @davecrupel2817
      @davecrupel2817 7 років тому +2

      that was a parker square. You still get a cookie :3

  • @wmconorbrown
    @wmconorbrown 10 років тому +92

    "Let's count that to make sure." Very difficult math I see it is to check the other 1 magic hexagon.

  • @jacderida
    @jacderida 10 років тому +93

    Numberphile2 would have been a nice place for the full solution :).

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  10 років тому +25

      Chris O'Neil there are some small extras from this video coming to Numberphile2 - but not that solution I'm afraid.

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat 10 років тому +2

      Numberphile
      Is the solution really that tedious?

    • @joaomelo7538
      @joaomelo7538 10 років тому +6

      EebstertheGreat Its just solving five variables system, nothing big...

    • @EebstertheGreat
      @EebstertheGreat 10 років тому +3

      João Melo
      There's a lot more to it than that, though. That just tells you the sum of each color.

    • @joaomelo7538
      @joaomelo7538 10 років тому +10

      yes, that's my point, if haven't understood I was being sarcastic. A five equation system takes too much time for a video

  • @8bit_pineapple
    @8bit_pineapple 10 років тому +278

    James: "What I have here is..." --- Me: "A poorly designed Settlers of Catan Board?"

  • @ragibhasan5745
    @ragibhasan5745 3 роки тому +3

    1:44
    Its the cutest "why" I have ever heard!

  • @General12th
    @General12th 9 років тому +12

    Brilliant video! Brilliant explanation, brilliant subject, brilliant professor. Simply intelligent.

  • @SaveSoilSaveSoil
    @SaveSoilSaveSoil 4 роки тому +1

    Nice! I never paid attention to these magic n-gons! Thank you for raising my awareness!

  • @DouglasZwick
    @DouglasZwick 8 років тому +37

    Oh man I laugh out loud at 1:50 every time

    • @BattousaiHBr
      @BattousaiHBr 7 років тому +7

      i cant even understand what he's saying
      "if you want to edit and cut to xxxxxx" ?

    • @EchoHeo
      @EchoHeo 6 років тому +6

      BattousaiHBr thats the point

  • @McJaews
    @McJaews 10 років тому +7

    Thank you Brady:) It's always great hearing Dr Grime talk about math. I did, however, notice a distinct lack of prime numbers in this video, and was wondering if there were any interesting mathematical things going on with geometric shapes that have a prime number of sides. I find it hard to imagine that there isn't.

    • @PC_Simo
      @PC_Simo 2 роки тому +3

      Well; the regular pentagon has a prime number of sides (5); and its diagonals bisect each other in the golden ratio, which is very much related to the Fibonacci numbers; and the Fibonacci numbers seem to me to contain relatively more primes, than any old random sequence; which, I guess, makes sense, given that the golden ratio is kind of like the most irrational number there is; so, if I expected primes to show up anywhere, it’s definitely in the Fibonacci sequence 🤔.

  • @Azmarith
    @Azmarith 10 років тому +142

    What's got 6 sides and isn't here any more?
    A hexagone.

    • @Triantalex
      @Triantalex Рік тому

      ??

    • @Azmarith
      @Azmarith Рік тому

      @@Triantalex A hexagon has six sides. But it's gone. So it's a hexa-gone.

  • @neelmodi5791
    @neelmodi5791 9 років тому +29

    Exponentiation of each number in the hexagon leads to a magic multiplicative hexagon!

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords 9 років тому +1

      +Neel Modi please explain 0.0

    • @pokestep
      @pokestep 8 років тому +6

      +Auro Cords I believe what they meant is that if you had a magic hexagon (or a square, works there too) with any number to the power of numbers in the magic square (or a hexagon) and you multiplied them within rows, you'd get the same number! Observe:
      For the usual 3x3 magic square, with rows of (6,7,2) (1,5,9) (8,3,4), if instead you had numbers like (2^6, 2^7, 2^2) (2^1, 2^5, 2^9) (2^8, 2^3, 2^4), which equals (64, 128, 4) (2, 32, 512) (256, 8, 16) and multiplied them (rows, columns, diagonals), they'd give you the same number! (2^15 or 32 768).
      The reason this works is because of the way exponentiation works - if you multiply numbers, such as a^b and a^c, the result is a^(b+c), you get the sum of the powers! (Observe: 2^2*2^3 = 4*8 = 32 = 2^5.) This works for any base number (i.e. you can have 3^x, 10^x is especially nice because you only add 0s, e^x... it's up to you!).
      Hope that helps and answers your question!

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords 8 років тому +1

      Amazing!
      I had forgotten about that property, I guess the original comment should have said "Exponentiation *to* each number in the hexagon..."
      I didn't quite get the last part of what you said: " (i.e. you can have 3^x, 10^x is especially nice because you only add 0s, e^x... it's up to you!)."
      Thank you =]

    • @pokestep
      @pokestep 8 років тому +1

      +Auro Cords You're welcome! What I meant by that part is that it doesn't need to be powers of 2 like I showed you, but it can also be powers of 3, powers of 10 (especially nice because then you're only adding 0s to the numbers, i.e. you get (100,1000000000,10000) (10000000,100000,1000) (1000000,10,100000000) I think), it can be powers of e - that is totally up to you! The sum of exponents during multiplication applies to any number. :)

    • @AuroCords
      @AuroCords 8 років тому +3

      Ah yes, that's what I understood but wasn't sure.
      This is why I love maths, gotta get some practice tho to keep the brain slick. tx again!

  • @abigailcooling6604
    @abigailcooling6604 2 роки тому +1

    I'm sure Matt Parker will create another magic hexagon that *almost* works. You've always got to give things a go!

    • @svz5990
      @svz5990 Рік тому

      You mean a Parker hexagon?

  • @LLHLMHfilms
    @LLHLMHfilms 8 років тому +70

    Now I want to play the settlers of catan

  • @mydemon
    @mydemon 3 місяці тому +1

    That edit at 1:51 is one of the funniest things I've ever seen.

  • @hiwadwardak2410
    @hiwadwardak2410 8 років тому +44

    8:35 to 8:44

  • @awaiskhan_47
    @awaiskhan_47 2 роки тому +1

    Another James Grime classic!

  • @najiali1068
    @najiali1068 9 років тому

    I love the way counting the sum of all numbers in one hexagon.
    Very nice video. I like your way of clearing up things.
    Thank you.

  • @jsnadrian
    @jsnadrian 10 років тому +2

    Having Dr Grime must be such a fun lecturer to have

  • @johnkat4391
    @johnkat4391 9 років тому +3

    Numbers that can't be in the same row in a 3x3 magic square:
    1,2
    1,3
    2,3
    7,8
    7,9
    8,9
    7,4
    3,6
    Also, 4 needs to be in a row with 5 or 6. 5 with 4 or 6. 6 with 4 or 5.
    There are probably other numbers that can't be together or have to be together, but this is what I've found so far.

    • @johnkat4391
      @johnkat4391 9 років тому +1

      Sorry, let me correct that. (I am on mobile so I can't edit it.)
      A 3x3 magic square where you can only use numbers 1-9 and the answer needs to be 15.

    • @johnkat4391
      @johnkat4391 9 років тому +1

      Another correction! You can only use each number once.

  • @7777stine
    @7777stine 10 років тому

    8:22 That Smile!!! LOL! This guy loves numbers clearly

  • @iisnothere
    @iisnothere 2 роки тому +1

    I do love that this mathematical phenomenon created the entire genre of “hex bingo”

  • @creature_from_Nukualofa
    @creature_from_Nukualofa 10 років тому +1

    I get the same feeling as reading a chapter by Martin Gardner.
    thanks Brady, thanks James for the wonderful content!
    ND

  • @burpie3258
    @burpie3258 9 років тому +131

    1:52 can't stop laughing

  • @LesMiserables999
    @LesMiserables999 8 років тому +8

    You're my magic hexagon James...

  • @daggawagga
    @daggawagga 8 років тому +107

    10:00 are Grime's birthmarks the vertices and center of an equilateral triangle?

    • @aves8964
      @aves8964 8 років тому +26

      Illuminati confirmed.

    • @daggawagga
      @daggawagga 8 років тому +16

      ***** if it was an equilateral triangle, it would be all of them! (I loved that one video)

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 8 років тому +11

      +Daggawaggaboof It looks like it _is_ an equilateral triangle!

    • @jacecockayne2054
      @jacecockayne2054 6 років тому +7

      What an awesome birth mark

    • @mclam168
      @mclam168 4 роки тому +4

      3 zeros in the time stamp. 3 side in a triangle. Illuminati confirmed.

  • @gregotox
    @gregotox 9 років тому +9

    he`s so happy about it! :D

  • @lejink
    @lejink 10 років тому +1

    Dr James Grime is my favorite :)

  • @leonhrad
    @leonhrad 10 років тому +17

    I want a t-shirt with a magic hexagon on it

  • @dominikf.1409
    @dominikf.1409 10 років тому +1

    I love the singing banana

  • @frawding9438
    @frawding9438 6 років тому +24

    Any Parker hexagons?

    • @rewrose2838
      @rewrose2838 4 роки тому +1

      120 of them
      all got rejected at the end in the favour of the correct one 😂

  • @DreamFreeFPV
    @DreamFreeFPV 9 років тому +21

    Not going to lie. My interest in watching this was to get better at settlers @numberphile

  • @BiffTech05
    @BiffTech05 5 років тому +2

    8:31 The Highlander magic hexagon

  • @KunamaElgar
    @KunamaElgar 10 років тому

    While I enjoy numberphile videos they usually go right over my head! I actually understood this video and followed his thinking all the way through so I really liked it.

  • @liamogrady5868
    @liamogrady5868 2 роки тому +2

    "And the diagonals too!"
    Matt Parker: what.

  • @kattay11
    @kattay11 10 років тому

    This went whoosh, over my head. But I love his dimple

  • @Richard_is_cool
    @Richard_is_cool 10 років тому +22

    Thank you! Also, will there be a Mandelbrot Set continuation? It's been more than a month. :)
    Keep up the good work!

  • @Ollervo100
    @Ollervo100 10 років тому +1

    James you are awesome! Keep up the good work!

  • @zerid0
    @zerid0 10 років тому +112

    Poor empty hexagon, he didn't even get mentioned :'(

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor 10 років тому +8

      Yeah! And what about n=-3! :(

    • @louisng114
      @louisng114 10 років тому

      Zardo Schneckmag n = -3 would make the denominator 0; better make it n = -2.

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor 10 років тому +1

      louisng114
      n=-3 would make a denominator of -5. A denominator of zero never appears.

    • @louisng114
      @louisng114 10 років тому +1

      Zardo Schneckmag Oops, I mean "makes the denominator -7."

    • @ZardoDhieldor
      @ZardoDhieldor 10 років тому +1

      louisng114
      Yeah, whatever! :D I'm used to calculate with 2n+1 more than 2n-1.

  • @boilpoil
    @boilpoil 10 років тому +57

    I like how Numberphile finally touched on Magic Squares :)
    Also, every comment (except Brady's) below me has nothing to do with the video. Lol.

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  10 років тому +30

      boilpoil we've done magic squares before!!!

    • @boilpoil
      @boilpoil 10 років тому +8

      Numberphile Really? I only subscribed a few months ago, at the video about -1/12 xD

    • @numberphile
      @numberphile  10 років тому +28

      boilpoil better get into the back catalog!!!!

    • @Kram1032
      @Kram1032 10 років тому +29

      boilpoil boy got you some work ahead of you

    • @grandexandi
      @grandexandi 10 років тому +1

      There already is another video about magic squares.

  • @robzwolf
    @robzwolf 10 років тому +1

    Really good video. Great chromakeying with the blue writing too, and very interesting to watch. Love it! :-)

  • @thrillscience
    @thrillscience 10 років тому +15

    Sorry, James! That's not the only magic hexagon. I have one just like it here!

  • @venweera4516
    @venweera4516 9 років тому +15

    @8:33 there is a slight addition error, happens to the best of us

  • @Radii_DC
    @Radii_DC 8 років тому +15

    0:58 NICE! :D

  • @MKWKezer
    @MKWKezer 10 років тому +1

    Very nice and not too hard either!
    You should do more videos, I love them, James :)

  • @TheSleepingAsian
    @TheSleepingAsian 10 років тому +3

    Kept seeing the "Settlers of Katan" board when I saw the Hexagons, haha.

  • @natereniger8773
    @natereniger8773 10 років тому

    Dr. Grime is so fun to listen to... I wish I could do my whole undergrad over again where he teaches every class.

  • @YindiOfficial
    @YindiOfficial 10 років тому

    James' videos are my favorite tbh.

  • @christianavery5518
    @christianavery5518 10 років тому

    Reminds me of a game we used to play in maths class called 'Nubble'. The maths of the game has nothing in common with the video but there were numbers in hexagons which formed a large hexagon.

  • @moppop275
    @moppop275 4 роки тому +2

    when he checked the magic hexagon of n=1 I died.

  • @CodyBenson13
    @CodyBenson13 10 років тому +1

    Very interesting. I have to say though, I only really watch when James is in the videos.

  • @brandonhorvath5881
    @brandonhorvath5881 10 років тому

    Thank you for blowing my mind once again.

  • @acediamond5399
    @acediamond5399 9 років тому

    Amazing! Great video. Seems a bit miraculous that even the 3-layer hexagon works.

    • @leonardomona9376
      @leonardomona9376 8 років тому +1

      +Ace Diamond theres nothing miraculous about it, its just a coincidence, things would be different if the numbers used is base 6 not base 10

    • @acediamond5399
      @acediamond5399 8 років тому

      Well yeah, that's kinda what I meant, not a literal miracle, lol.

    • @acediamond5399
      @acediamond5399 8 років тому

      But, besides the point, this concept is base-independent.

  • @MrCyanGaming
    @MrCyanGaming 7 років тому +9

    In the video you never mentioned that the Magic Hexagon must be made of consecutive numbers. Since you can just multiply all of the Numbers in the Hexagon shown in this video by 2 and get a new Hexagon that Works. (MAGIC NUMBER: 76)
    If you want a Magic Hexagon in it's simplest form, you can take the Hexagon shown in the video and Add 8 to the Pink, then Add 16 to the Blue and Center. This will give you a new Magic Hexagon in it's simplest form. (MAGIC NUMBER: 70)

    • @migorpresents8991
      @migorpresents8991 Рік тому +1

      Thanks for the explanation. I couldn't figure out what was going on at 2:34

    • @yatra6110
      @yatra6110 Рік тому

      Magic number 76 works as well as other multiples of 38 . The array of numbers for M 76 are consecutive even numbers! These magic hexagon 1-19 numbers x3 =114 should work but they r not consecutive numbers..
      and for 70, I tried but it’s not working for all rows..

    • @MrCyanGaming
      @MrCyanGaming Рік тому +1

      @@yatra6110 Add 16 to the center instead of 8, that's mb

  • @thermotronica
    @thermotronica 10 років тому +1

    Beautiful video!

  • @Tobis0x00
    @Tobis0x00 10 років тому

    Dr James Grime said "There can be only one..." He's my new hero. The Highlander of Hexagons!

  • @quaironnailo
    @quaironnailo 8 років тому +2

    This is entirely based on the fact that it has to use every single number from one to the number of hexagons (19 in this case), which is not a condition for a magic shape.

  • @BLiZIHGUH
    @BLiZIHGUH 10 років тому +1

    5:24 and then James Grime sets the hexagons on fire

  • @aurabozzi228
    @aurabozzi228 11 місяців тому +1

    This is a beautiful proof!

  • @jlolme
    @jlolme 10 років тому

    I'M CRYING AT BRADY'S EDITING

  • @AlbinosaurusR3X
    @AlbinosaurusR3X 10 років тому

    Love your show, Numberphile.

  • @maxor669
    @maxor669 6 років тому +2

    No one tell Matt this is the only one and let him "have a go at it" XD

  • @nonitta
    @nonitta 10 років тому

    This is Amazing, I find this so interesting! Thank you for teaching me something new!

  • @TheConnor12500
    @TheConnor12500 10 років тому +7

    Could you perhaps do a video on slide puzzles? I've been doing lots recently and can never do a scrambled 4x4 in less than around 60 moves, is there a number of moves all can be completed in like Gods Number, and how about for a nxn puzzle? Love the videos!

  • @MrSaemichlaus
    @MrSaemichlaus 5 років тому +4

    5:36 sponsered by Google Chrome.

  • @dans5606
    @dans5606 8 років тому

    Sitting here watching videos about magic squares, and just noticed Matt Parker's "Magic Square Party Trick" for the 34 magic square! Oh, you guys.

  • @brankodimitrijevic382
    @brankodimitrijevic382 10 років тому

    Great videos watching from Serbia!

  • @jimbo-fk4dq
    @jimbo-fk4dq 8 років тому

    Numberphile should get a show on PBS. Preferably PBS, because it's too smart for cable TV. I'd love watch it.

  • @TheAAMoy
    @TheAAMoy 10 років тому

    FYI, this fucking ROCKS!

  • @carlb.9518
    @carlb.9518 10 років тому +5

    Numberphile Nice! What about magic cubes and hypercubes?

  • @Zack0ry
    @Zack0ry 10 років тому

    its cool how you just added his handwriting instead of a preset font :)

  • @drorfrid
    @drorfrid 8 років тому +1

    At the end, I have checked why it is the only magic hexagon, and I didn't understand why Y is even, smallest possible

  • @xvipes
    @xvipes 10 років тому

    Welcome back James

  • @karlkastor
    @karlkastor 10 років тому

    That's great. Magic Squares are to mainstream, so it's good to have this. Very interesting that there's only one possible way to do it.

  • @JoshDan12
    @JoshDan12 10 років тому +3

    YES!

  • @rywilk
    @rywilk 9 років тому +1

    Very cool! I'll have to give this a go in my spare time =p

  • @Ahov
    @Ahov 10 років тому

    Wow, grats on 1m subs!

  • @TimmahDee
    @TimmahDee 10 років тому +70

    Not sure if editing humor at 1:52... or just mistake during editing...

    • @choco_jack7016
      @choco_jack7016 6 років тому +5

      I think it says "sort of edit and cut to hoint (idk) with theee so..."

  • @Nami-x
    @Nami-x 10 років тому

    Numberphile If I get this right, the definition of a magic hexagon is to use each number once. If you allowed that rule, you could create infinite magic hexagons by simply adding 2 to all outer numbers, 1 to all middle ring numbers and 0 to the central number (in this example they all add up to 44 then (you take 3x the number you added to the outer ring)), however in my workings you do get the number 5 three times.

  • @Ajax-0137
    @Ajax-0137 10 років тому

    Lol, when Brady edited. That was hilarious

  • @MartinMllerSkarbiniksPedersen
    @MartinMllerSkarbiniksPedersen 9 років тому

    Fantastic. Thanks a lot.

  • @Adamantium9001
    @Adamantium9001 10 років тому +7

    What if you remove the requirement that the numbers in the cells have to be 1 through n?

  • @sevilus7812
    @sevilus7812 2 роки тому +1

    Thanks

  • @dr-baboul3077
    @dr-baboul3077 10 років тому

    Good work !!

  • @all_the_moga
    @all_the_moga 6 років тому +1

    sure glad he cleared up the 1 hex for me :D :D :D

  • @robertvdhill367
    @robertvdhill367 10 років тому +2

    Step 1: Make hexagons
    Step 2: Make honeycomb
    Step 3: Magic
    Step 4: Profit!
    ;)

  • @ultravidz
    @ultravidz 10 років тому

    Great one!

  • @NoriMori1992
    @NoriMori1992 8 років тому +14

    9:55 - …Yellow? _Yellow?!_

    • @ch48_
      @ch48_ 8 років тому +4

      Yeah, that's clearly yellow. Are you colorblind or something?

    • @NoriMori1992
      @NoriMori1992 8 років тому

      +Corny Can't tell if you're trolling, joking, or simply colourblind yourself.

    • @KessaWitdaFro
      @KessaWitdaFro 8 років тому

      I'm not joking at all it really looks greenish yellow to me :/. they thing is I've taken color discrimination tests and usually do really well so I'm currently taking a poll of all my friends to get a consensus

    • @ch48_
      @ch48_ 8 років тому +1

      TBH, it looks yellowish green to me.

    • @qwertyTRiG
      @qwertyTRiG 8 років тому

      It will depend somewhat on your monitor settings and on the ambient light as you watch.
      TRiG.

  • @Eliina552
    @Eliina552 10 років тому

    James is my fave guest :)

  • @anon8109
    @anon8109 10 років тому +1

    Lovely.
    It's surprising that it's possible to tease out 3 independant equations by adding up rows in different ways.
    Are there any other magic shapes?

  • @whydontiknowthat
    @whydontiknowthat 9 років тому +1

    SONG FROM THE MANDELBROT SEQUENCE VIDEO! AT THE END!

  • @Odood19
    @Odood19 10 років тому

    Equilateral hexagons are my favorite polygon! They occur in nature.