Writing Strong Characters - The Important Distinction Between Want and Need

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 29 вер 2024
  • In this video I explore one of the most overlooked aspects of screenwriting, "Want Vs. Need", and apply it to Lord of the Rings, The Matrix, and Toy Story.
    Check out my Screenwriting Playlist: • Screenwriting & Film T...
    Subscribe and follow me at: / daniel_whidden
    Translate this video: www.youtube.co...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 576

  • @ThinkStory
    @ThinkStory  3 роки тому +106

    🍿 Want more Screenwriting Videos? Check out my playlist: ua-cam.com/play/PLY9KJ1cFVs7hcQCA0WMUJLQTCzmg8zcTB.html 🍿

  • @TheUgliestBarnacle
    @TheUgliestBarnacle 5 років тому +2656

    “Want drives plot, need drives theme”
    Damn, man. Nice.

    • @YaGaffNonce
      @YaGaffNonce 3 роки тому +14

      Need does not necessarily drive theme. I would say that statement is bold enough to be simply deemed incorrect. It happens a lot, but most certainly not enough to make such a simplified statement such as "need drives theme". Rather, I would say it can greatly contribute to theme. That is a statement which is misleading without specificity.
      Take Frodo in The Lord of the Rings. Frodo needs Sam to destroy the ring (friendship/fellowship). However, according to Tolkien, the theme of the franchise is "Death and Immortality". It is also said to be "good and evil" by goodreads.com. Friendship is one of many themes in LOTR, but it is not the driving theme.
      I would agree that want almost always drives plot.
      Awesome video!

    • @isitchillyinahut5921
      @isitchillyinahut5921 5 місяців тому +2

      I drive, and I need for speed.

  • @izenfaust3856
    @izenfaust3856 5 років тому +266

    "If you need me, but don't want me, I'll stay, but if you want me, but don't need me anymore, I'll go." Nanny McPhee 😄

  • @idanil016
    @idanil016 4 роки тому +127

    You should have mentioned that in Manchester by the Sea the absence of WANT is an essential part of Affleck's character. He is in depression, he suffered a lot and can't move past that suffering. It is a true portrayal of a mental breakdown. You really can feel it when you follow him in situations which are not related to his WANTS or NEEDS.

    • @akrinord
      @akrinord 3 роки тому +17

      Yeah exactly, I was just going to write the same. The lack of want as the result of unfathomable loss is the heartbreaking point of that movie.

    • @niqueladajoa4759
      @niqueladajoa4759 3 роки тому +12

      Is too late but, yeah, I thought the same. He has been in pain for so long, that's why he doesn't have a WANT. MBTS is a great movie.

    • @joee8278
      @joee8278 2 роки тому +8

      Agreed. I stopped watching when he suggested that Manchester by the Sea is not a great movie.

    • @Liam-tp7td
      @Liam-tp7td 2 роки тому +5

      He has a want, it's to get out of Manchester. His nephew gets in the way because all his life is there.

  • @IceRiver1020
    @IceRiver1020 5 років тому +31

    Definitely something I'll think more about in my writing from now on!
    I have a character who wants to be free, but needs to be selfless. Which means giving up on freedom, because his desire for freedom is selfish, it's something that he has to hurt others to achieve, and something that would require him to follow in the footsteps of the man who took his freedom away in the first place. He would become like the man that he hates, something that would hurt himself as well as others.

    • @parkoho
      @parkoho 2 роки тому +1

      Good luck on your writing!

  • @daelaenor
    @daelaenor 2 роки тому +3

    It's so exciting to realize ways you could implement these things into your plot. By coincidence, I've already laid down a fitting scenario for wants and needs. My main character's want is to overthrow a tyranny in order to help the common folk (which in itself will be very ambiguous), and he needs to realize that he's someone special who has the ability to do so with the help of others who put trust in him.

  • @lyndsaystval6752
    @lyndsaystval6752 5 років тому +13

    Great work guys. I've watched a ton of stuff about characters and this is right up there. Very clear and easily understood.

  • @SergioOsvaldoVA
    @SergioOsvaldoVA 5 років тому +5

    Great video but I will also say that theme is equally important in stories and most of the times the characters both embrace and define the variants of the theme. LFTS did a brilliant video about it.

  • @pyromaniac301
    @pyromaniac301 4 роки тому +2

    A silly movie to bring up but you kept mentioning childhood so.... Cars, the final scene kept popping into my head and I remember as a kid I was never upset about Lightning not winning the race and was more happy that he wasn't a douchebag anymore.

  • @Sarah-fb1nm
    @Sarah-fb1nm 3 роки тому +1

    I love this video so much, I don’t plan to write my first story anytime soon because I want to improve my art and storytelling in a lot of ways, but I feel like I just improved my character 100 percent, he may not be the best but I’m proud of it, thank you

  • @stephanielikescake2501
    @stephanielikescake2501 3 роки тому +1

    I wrote two pages of notes for my novel from this vid. Thank you for a very interesting and helpful explanation of this

  • @braelinmichelus
    @braelinmichelus 5 років тому +2

    Love this video! Very glad I found it. I'll never think of stories in the same way again. I'm an aspiring writer, and this video has seriously helped me in writing my characters. Thanks for making this video!

  • @jahanvigurjar5744
    @jahanvigurjar5744 4 роки тому +1

    I can't believe how much I learned from this single video......🤗😍

  • @james4727
    @james4727 5 років тому

    just found your channel, very insightful, i have been researching storycraft and movies for personal interest for a year or so and these vids are perhaps the most concisely put and insightful breakdowns of story.

  • @jaizerocool
    @jaizerocool 4 роки тому

    I have no words to describe how much I liked this video

  • @spinittweeks3246
    @spinittweeks3246 4 роки тому +9

    Think it’s sad when people miss the want from Manchester by the Sea.
    It’s a late payoff but there is definitely still a want. The fact that the want is to avoid the need at all costs, makes it even more special. Beautiful story, well executed

  • @damianstarks3338
    @damianstarks3338 9 місяців тому

    Great analysis of want and need

  • @roonilwazlib6852
    @roonilwazlib6852 4 роки тому +1

    So for exemple in How To train your dragon 1, what Hiccup WANTS is to become a viking, but what he NEEDS is to accept himself as he is ? And here he has to let go of his want to realise his need

  • @andrewjohnston1564
    @andrewjohnston1564 5 років тому

    This video makes me want to read Anatomy of Story more thoroughly. I will definitely watch this again as well.

  • @Liam-tp7td
    @Liam-tp7td 2 роки тому +1

    Manchester by the Sea has a very clear want. Lee wants to get out of Manchester, but his nephew gets in the way as all his life is there.

  • @kaptenkladdkaka8769
    @kaptenkladdkaka8769 5 років тому

    This was very insightful. As a writer, I'm thankful

  • @TheGamersState
    @TheGamersState 2 роки тому +1

    It's a shame that so many people, myself included, fall into the trap of assuming writing is easy and that you just need to make stuff happen and it will by definition be good.
    How wrong we were, there is so much to writing a good story and it's scary at times at how easy it is to make a wrong turn and it could potentially ruin the entire thing.

  • @nicholasrodinos4701
    @nicholasrodinos4701 5 років тому +1

    The Room is a perfect example of want/need.
    Want: The movie to end.
    Need: The movie to fucking end so that I don't go insane.

  • @JuanSerradelaFuente
    @JuanSerradelaFuente 5 років тому

    I wanted this video and half way through I realized I needed it

  • @Mo-gw5bq
    @Mo-gw5bq 5 років тому +2

    I love this so much! Such an amazing video honestly.
    But! I need to ask: obviously here we're talking about protagonists, how do you think secondary characters fall on this? Per example: The Joker from the Dark Knight is my favourite character/person/performance ever on screen, we know what the joker wants -PURE CHAOS- but we don't really need to know his internal needs to overcome whatever is in his way, as a matter of fact there aren't any. So my question basically is: how does one write a strong villain? Or better: how would you put a villain on the same format as this video?

  • @eedwardgrey2
    @eedwardgrey2 3 роки тому

    Infinity train is a series that's really explicit about this

  • @positivity29
    @positivity29 4 роки тому +1

    Great video

  • @eduardoarmas8286
    @eduardoarmas8286 5 років тому

    It's not the video I want, but it's the one I need.

  • @noxlupa2996
    @noxlupa2996 5 років тому

    Thank you so much for the informative video :D I'll have to keep these in mind while developing my characters in the future.

  • @SAGINAWDANCESHOW
    @SAGINAWDANCESHOW 5 років тому

    Excellent!

  • @ProblematicBeach
    @ProblematicBeach 2 роки тому

    this actually helped alot thx

  • @sqdtnz
    @sqdtnz 4 роки тому

    This is actually very valuable advice.

  • @TheMinarus
    @TheMinarus 5 років тому +5

    And when a film doesn't have a WANT or a NEED ...Well...:"YOU'RE TEARING ME APPART LISA!!!!!!!"
    HAHAHAHA Favorite part LMAO

  • @KKati-th6bv
    @KKati-th6bv 3 роки тому

    Thank you for sharing. Great explanation on the point. Wish you flows and inspiration for your writing

  • @steelphiltv4975
    @steelphiltv4975 4 роки тому

    This helps alot thanks

  • @EverythingHappens4AReason
    @EverythingHappens4AReason 4 роки тому

    Amazing Video

  • @LukaSzent
    @LukaSzent 3 роки тому

    This was great, but... what if the character is self destructive, like in There Will Be Blood? Is it still a need if it isn’t inherently a good change for them? That wasn’t touched upon here and I feel that’s a really important point to making a plethora of different characters. Would love another video elaborating the wants and needs of a character that falls to their weaknesses instead of finding their need to overcome the situation.

  • @tangobayus
    @tangobayus 5 років тому +1

    I think you need to go deeper on need. Frodo- need to be more than just a face in the crowd even if it costs him his life. Cowboy- need to be loved by the child. Neo- need to play a more powerful role in his world. Ask yourself what need of yours is met by doing videos. Needs can drive us to do things that are not in our interest, particularly if we don't know what they are.

    • @Darfaultner
      @Darfaultner 5 років тому

      You're right, but these are all wants. The needs are, Frodo needs to let go of ego and accept help, Woody needs to, ironically, be less needy, and let go of his ego and share Andy's love and Neo needs to let go of his egotistical delusions and just be. The Oracle helps him by releasing his expectations. This video hasn't quite got it right, mixing up wants with plot.

    • @tangobayus
      @tangobayus 5 років тому

      @@Darfaultner Excellent analysis :)

  • @josephmerboth1832
    @josephmerboth1832 Рік тому +2

    I have to disagree with you. Most of the Wants you mentioned are already good, selfless, mature desires - saving Middle Earth or defeating the robots. A proper Want isn’t just a desire, but a fundamentally *flawed* desire. It has to be negative, or at least suboptimal compared to the Need.
    Frodo doesn’t have a clear Want and Need. You could maybe say his Want is to “Bear the burden alone,” but I don’t feel this was strongly developed. If you’re looking at LOTR characters, the better example is Aragorn, who Wants anonymity but Needs to become the king.
    A Want should be fueled by a foundational lie the character believes. Woody believes only the favorite toy matters. The truth is that all toys matter and together create a full, imaginative life for a kid. Embracing that truth helps him obtain his Need and find fulfillment.
    Wants get in the way. Needs let us become our better selves.

  • @Thomas-zu1wq
    @Thomas-zu1wq 3 роки тому

    About Transformers:
    In The Third One Optimus Wanted To “Save” Sentinel Prime But Needed To Accept That He Needed To Be Killed.
    In The Fourth One He Wanted To Wipe Out KSI But Needed To Accept That Revenge Won’t Bring Back His Fallen Autobots

  • @nktyfy
    @nktyfy 5 років тому

    Such an awesome video i write this comment in middle of the video

  • @LonelyTime
    @LonelyTime 4 роки тому

    Wow, such a great video!

  • @jamesharding6758
    @jamesharding6758 3 роки тому

    Love from my heart

  • @JeremyFrancispiano
    @JeremyFrancispiano 5 років тому

    Sound advice. Thank you!

  • @Prizm17
    @Prizm17 Місяць тому

    Came here because I’m making a comic and I guess I was on the right Track already 😂

  • @milesgreb9256
    @milesgreb9256 5 років тому +8

    "frodo rejects sam" no he doesn't. The ring does

    • @sikid4000
      @sikid4000 5 років тому

      The ring doesn't either. It was just added in the movie.

    • @Nu_Wen
      @Nu_Wen 5 років тому +4

      He still made the choice to follow through with the rejection. The ring/gollum may have both made it easier to make that decision but he was still the one who made the end decision and followed throught with it.

  • @eatingshelf6135
    @eatingshelf6135 3 роки тому

    I’m trying to make a shitpost of a story but here I am still trying to learn tips anyway even though I told myself I wasn’t going to take it seriously

  • @jesperquistgaard
    @jesperquistgaard 5 років тому

    Thank you for this 🏆

  • @mutantXfactor
    @mutantXfactor 4 роки тому

    the sad thing about Frodo is that at the end he gets peace for everyone but not for himself, missing the ring as a ptsd metaphore. So does why he retire to the withe shores with Gandalf at the end, to get peace. Is sad because is not the end many wanted but the end he needed.

  • @mutiaraf7120
    @mutiaraf7120 5 років тому

    Thanks a lot man

  • @Xerclipse
    @Xerclipse 2 роки тому

    Would a villain be someone who ends up solving their wants, but not their needs? Let's say Woody would be a villain. He fulfills his wants by successfully getting rid of Buzz and has no witnesses to shun him (even though in the real movie, there were witnesses). But he doesn't fulfill his need to share being Andy's favorite and he doesn't learn or realize it. We understand his motivations, wants, and needs, but he just doesn't solve his needs.

  • @TimothyCHenderson
    @TimothyCHenderson 3 роки тому

    Not Tootsie, anything but Tootsie!

  • @Sameoldfitup
    @Sameoldfitup 3 роки тому

    When I was six years old my stepmother left me in a doorway with a note saying not wanted

  • @MaduUdeh
    @MaduUdeh 4 роки тому

    What if by want and need are the same thing? Or very similar at least. Like it's a one character story

  • @jlall4467
    @jlall4467 3 роки тому

    I watched rocky when I was 10. I actually was happy he didnt win because it was unexpected and I thought it might be too unrealistic

  • @zientdeveero6908
    @zientdeveero6908 4 роки тому

    Is this more for movies than it is for video games? Im not sure how to get this to work when you, as the player, are the protagonist

  • @zednotzee
    @zednotzee 5 років тому +3803

    Funny, when i watched Rocky as a kid i didn't realize he didn't win. He was still standing, the bell rung, everyone cheered, the music swelled and he got the girl. I thought he had won

    • @monicalukomski8884
      @monicalukomski8884 5 років тому +549

      He might not have won the boxing match, but he ended up happy. That's why they did all the things that would leave you to believe thag he won. Because he did win.

    • @jacktbc3947
      @jacktbc3947 5 років тому +80

      Zed Not Zee he became the people’s champion

    • @lucasgill7819
      @lucasgill7819 5 років тому +67

      Because he won. He won the important battle

    • @newperve
      @newperve 5 років тому +48

      His stated goal was to go the distance with Apollo Creed so that he could prove he wasn't a bum. He did that. He accomplished his goals, so he did win in that sense.

    • @jasonleetaiwan
      @jasonleetaiwan 5 років тому +40

      He lost by decision, but he won in a way because no one expected him to go the distance. He set out to go the distance, and he did. If the match had gone on for another round, he would have knocked out Apollo, and that's why it's a great story.

  • @wenceslaobelano9858
    @wenceslaobelano9858 5 років тому +2325

    This is an eye-opener. Big help to fiction writers out there. Thank you so much.

    • @chramoso
      @chramoso 5 років тому +25

      agreed! in case you're looking for more writing tips, may i suggest checking out the channel Hello Future Me, he has great videos on writing (mostly fantasy though). :)

    • @lifeismusicparnadonkers
      @lifeismusicparnadonkers 3 роки тому +2

      I totally agree i love you,re explaning

  • @cjkalandek996
    @cjkalandek996 5 років тому +4570

    So, Aang in "Avatar: The Last Airbender" *wanted* to just be a kid but he *needed* to accept his role as the Avatar if he was gonna end the war.

    • @ChristopherCopeland
      @ChristopherCopeland 5 років тому +675

      Cj Kalandek additionally, and in a more complex way, I think he actually had to overcome people’s expectations of him as “The Avatar”, realizing that if he was going to save the world, he had to do it in a way that was true to himself if he was to break the cycle that caused the problems to begin with.
      Avatar is wild. Haha.

    • @broccolinyu911
      @broccolinyu911 5 років тому +300

      incredible example. I love Avatar. such a well developed show for being aimed at pre-teens and kids

    • @soridosuneku
      @soridosuneku 5 років тому +152

      @@broccolinyu911 Thank the head writer of Avatar at the time, Aaron Ehasz, for that. He knew how to develop the story that the creators of the show wanted to tell, and did it well

    • @ultron-5600
      @ultron-5600 5 років тому +36

      Kachu the movie was garbage but the animated show is actually pretty good and entertaining

    • @broccolinyu911
      @broccolinyu911 5 років тому +62

      @@ultron-5600 oh no, that was another film. I believe it was called "No shit, Sherlock"

  • @OliKember
    @OliKember 6 років тому +1383

    Thanks, this was great. It's all about that internal vs external battle. And to add to this, sometimes what they want is actually what gets in the way of their need, and their journey can be about letting go of the want, in order to fulfil and realise the need. Just another way to play it. Cheers!

    • @ThinkStory
      @ThinkStory  6 років тому +89

      You got it! So many films don't do that.

    • @PkrBarMovie
      @PkrBarMovie 5 років тому +33

      That's actually an objectively better way to go about it, as sacrifice cannot fail to evoke strong emotions when executed properly.

    • @iPodiMaster
      @iPodiMaster 5 років тому +2

      Thanks for the clarification, Oliver. I honestly had some trouble understanding

    • @davidbjacobs3598
      @davidbjacobs3598 5 років тому +29

      Like in Up, Carl wants to bring his house to Paradise Falls to wait out the rest of his life, but he needs to go create a new adventure and learn to live without Ellie. In order to realize this, he has to abandon all of his furniture and finally the house itself. The line, "It's just a house," hits me every. damn. time.

    • @Agbahizzal
      @Agbahizzal 5 років тому +5

      This seems to be the one way to summarize the life of all those who have become agents of maturation throughout the generations.

  • @diweyproduction5861
    @diweyproduction5861 5 років тому +890

    “Now we listed the 5 known differences, but what if a film doesn’t meet one of the standards.”
    “BuMbLe BeE sToP lUbErCaTiNg ThE mAn!”

    • @layicorn
      @layicorn 4 роки тому +11

      😏😉😈

    • @dayanmoshe9037
      @dayanmoshe9037 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/xZuQTd57NXg/v-deo.html
      do watch

    • @baussier134
      @baussier134 3 роки тому +8

      Michael Bay crap fest

    • @ameliaharper3762
      @ameliaharper3762 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/xZuQTd57NXg/v-deo.html

    • @desiirwin35
      @desiirwin35 2 роки тому +1

      I think that would fall under fun.

  • @kisari-arts
    @kisari-arts 5 років тому +399

    It's that "Dig a little deeper" scene from Princess and the frog. You *want* to become human, but you are blind to what you need.

    • @ameliaharper3762
      @ameliaharper3762 3 роки тому

      ua-cam.com/video/xZuQTd57NXg/v-deo.html

    • @stoneman18
      @stoneman18 3 роки тому +8

      Yeah, and they got what they wanted the moment they got what they needed. Still my favorite Disney movie

  • @robertminnie782
    @robertminnie782 5 років тому +792

    "What you want isn't the same as what you need" _(Disney's Princess and the Frog,_ 2009).

    • @HiruHeart
      @HiruHeart 4 роки тому +36

      I was thinking about the song "Dig a Little Deeper" while watching!

    • @lightn2783
      @lightn2783 4 роки тому +1

      Heh

    • @domacinerast1664
      @domacinerast1664 4 роки тому +7

      Omg yes I just watched that movie yesterday after few years and it's pretty well done with its story and the characters

    • @malaksafa4074
      @malaksafa4074 3 роки тому +1

      I was thinking about this just now!

    • @robertminnie782
      @robertminnie782 3 роки тому +6

      @@domacinerast1664
      I still find it impressive too. That movie was a gem. Good message behind it and well-executed arcs to illustrate it.
      I watched it over and over again... STILL so good.

  • @animarts954
    @animarts954 5 років тому +274

    This is the reason why side character are more appreciated than the main character. The main character can often time revert to their old ways and hinder there more than the viewer realizes.

  • @rhale115
    @rhale115 6 років тому +287

    This was very well put together!

  • @KekerikiGreen
    @KekerikiGreen 6 років тому +284

    Like how you began and ended on that rocky note

  • @jaredgunkle1562
    @jaredgunkle1562 5 років тому +341

    rocky isnt about winning
    what i wanted was to see rocky win
    what i needed was to punch people more often

  • @CodyJancaric
    @CodyJancaric 5 років тому +202

    The WANT / NEED connection to your viewing experience with Rocky is absolutely brilliant!

  • @valkyrie5018
    @valkyrie5018 5 років тому +407

    Literally every time a lotr clip plays I start to cry and then it ends immediately and I’m fine. Then more clips play. The lotr movies are just that amazing

    • @fan-girlsanonymous7650
      @fan-girlsanonymous7650 5 років тому +7

      Valkyrie501 I was the same way with the matrix clips lol though Lotr is most excellent

    • @baylee8659
      @baylee8659 4 роки тому +5

      That's what happened with me at the end of the video when he played Rocky lol. INSTANT tears.

    • @okasart
      @okasart 3 роки тому +1

      LITERALLY ME 😂

  • @100mhopkins
    @100mhopkins 5 років тому +205

    THANK YOU! This was incredibly insightful and eyeopening for me. As an amateur, screenwriting enthusiast/hobbyist (yes, that's how I categorize myself) I sometimes jumble and mix up the need and the want and their symbiotic roles in creating a complete character and story. Thanks for the super clear explanation. I'll let you know if helps lift my screenplay off the runway!
    Mark - Columbus, Ohio

  • @shankarrammurthy8724
    @shankarrammurthy8724 6 років тому +105

    Nice ending with rocky freeze frame effect.

    • @ThinkStory
      @ThinkStory  6 років тому +14

      Haha, unfortunately I can't take credit for that. That's the actual Rocky ending which worked out perfectly for me :)

  • @bryantdeutschman3409
    @bryantdeutschman3409 5 років тому +94

    I just write my stories and characters based on my experience of watching movies and reading books I’ve loved, but it was interesting to watch the analysis you present. I didn’t even know I was writing that way already. Well done, I took notes. Thanks.

  • @shua_the_great
    @shua_the_great 5 років тому +15

    0:12 They're all owned by Disney?

    • @nhmooytis7058
      @nhmooytis7058 4 роки тому +2

      ShuaTheGreat LOTR isn’t is it? Or Matrix, i think both are Warner. Toy Story is.

  • @DD-nc3zx
    @DD-nc3zx 5 років тому +65

    I was 8 first time watching Rocky. And loved it, because he did not won, like in any other stereotypical hero story.
    He lost but he was a hero. I dont understand people watching movies for a positive outcome. Its the journey that counts.

    • @aspiringeyecandy4856
      @aspiringeyecandy4856 5 років тому +1

      Penultimate sentence comes across as condescending.

    • @DD-nc3zx
      @DD-nc3zx 5 років тому +7

      @@aspiringeyecandy4856 to who? to positivitty people on planet eden? your comment is judgemental...and meaningless, why bothering to write it?

    • @shabeehhaider2553
      @shabeehhaider2553 3 роки тому +2

      I wholeheartedly agree. Sometimes people just care more about the ending than the importance of the journey.

  • @izzytheamazing
    @izzytheamazing 5 років тому +29

    I'm learning about storytelling so that I can figure out how to tell my own story. Currently working through the "Pixar in a Box" course on Khan Academy and I came here to learn more about "Wants vs Needs." Not only did this video help me understand it from a storytelling perspective, I also managed to create a wants/needs list for myself. Thank you for such a good video!

  • @riverpaw3234
    @riverpaw3234 4 роки тому +39

    *”Bumblebee, stop lubricating the man.”*

    • @dragongemgaming8294
      @dragongemgaming8294 4 роки тому +2

      I read this right when that scene was played in the video lol 🤣

  • @schnoz2372
    @schnoz2372 4 роки тому +28

    Too well written, edited, read, and spoken to pass up. UA-cam recommendations rarely work for me but here I’ve found gold

  • @wesselconway3920
    @wesselconway3920 4 роки тому +26

    You’ve explained this concept better than anyone ever has.

  • @robertmoore4050
    @robertmoore4050 5 років тому +32

    Writing a good story is call life. That's what make a good character.
    I do comics and this will help me even more

  • @theironqueen2386
    @theironqueen2386 4 роки тому +3

    Toy story a tale of communism

  • @MarkowskyArt
    @MarkowskyArt 6 років тому +20

    Truly excellent distillation of the difference between these two concepts. Been looking at lots of videos to help me clarify them and this one really nailed it! Well done! Looking forward to more!

  • @starwing2814
    @starwing2814 4 роки тому +11

    This was extremely helpful! I'm currently struggling in developing characters. I've struggled with this concept for a while. But now I feel like I have a good understanding! Thank you for this video!

  • @m3ng252
    @m3ng252 4 роки тому +11

    This is such a good essay, no words wasted. I wish I could write essays like this.

  • @filmmakeranto
    @filmmakeranto 6 років тому +18

    I read John Truby but this essay gave a whole new level of information..
    You helped me a lot with my characterization for the Screenplay I'm working on.. Thank you

    • @ThinkStory
      @ThinkStory  6 років тому +3

      That is excellent! And good luck with the screenplay!

  • @traumachild1737
    @traumachild1737 5 років тому +16

    I've always loved writting but I always find my characters weak, this video will be a great help to improving that. Thank you!

  • @Prene16
    @Prene16 5 років тому +11

    I am in the middle of writing a book and i am struggling with a secondary character... Watching this video made me realize he lacks a "want"... He is so "supporting" to the main character he doesnt have his goal and thats making him an extra even tho he is very important in driving the plot.... I dont want anything and any characters to be there just to fill in a plot hole so i am stuck...

    • @el_tdg
      @el_tdg 3 роки тому +1

      You still writing?

  • @Dog-vb5dc
    @Dog-vb5dc 5 років тому +15

    bUmBlE bEe sToP LuBriCaTing tHe mAn.
    WHEEEEZE

  • @BackboneAgZ
    @BackboneAgZ 5 років тому +48

    I’m not sure Manchester by the Sea was a good example. He has a clear want: to move on from his traumatic past, which he thinks he’ll achieve only in solitude. What stands in his way is actually his need in achieving his want: having to finish raising his nephew. It ties in perfectly with your final statement in this video. “What we need might be right in front of us and we don’t even realize it.” The distraction of a responsibility as high as raising a high school kid and the closeness of family could help him regain his sense of purpose. I don’t wanna spoil the ending for anyone who hasn’t seen it, but essentially, he finds a middle ground between his want and need, which I think makes for a pretty excellent and somewhat satisfying ending to a mostly depressing film.
    However off the top of my head, I can’t think of a movie with too much need and too little want.
    Overall, this video offers an incredible insight to what makes for good character writing.

    • @luciddreams7540
      @luciddreams7540 5 років тому +18

      Completely agree. In Manchester, he just wanted to be left alone and bury the past, leaving his family behind to do so. His need was to face the past, moving on by embracing family once again.

    • @64ccd
      @64ccd 5 років тому +7

      I see your point but am inclined to agree with Think Story. I think that the problem is that wanting to move on from the past isn't tangible enough, and as such borders on being a need. I think it could've been made clearer if his traumatic past was standing in the way of something else that he wanted. I don't know what it is Casey would rather be doing with his life if he weren't haunted by his past.

    • @berlinsb1
      @berlinsb1 4 роки тому

      I agree. And for my Manchester by the Sea really worked in every way. I was hooked and deeply moved.

    • @jakeblottenberger3699
      @jakeblottenberger3699 4 роки тому

      Manchester by the Sea is the best example I have ever seen of a movie that is pure shit.

    • @fatmac1975
      @fatmac1975 4 роки тому +1

      I really like your analysis but I also think it can work even without the feeling of a “need”. I think that feeling of little aim and strong clear goal works in a story about overcoming the depression and trying to escape the past: you can feel like nothing is really happening and you’re just stuck in time

  • @joshsale9939
    @joshsale9939 Рік тому +2

    I’m no expert but clearly wants and needs can be both external and internal.
    Manchester by the Sea
    Yeah I stopped when you criticised that.

  • @alfredhigglestein2828
    @alfredhigglestein2828 4 роки тому +5

    Just wanted to say how helpful this video was for me. I've been wanting to write a story since I was a kid and having this sort of semi guideline for how to structure characters around their needs and the plot is super helpful. Great vid thanks again

  • @MrReaperofDead
    @MrReaperofDead 4 роки тому +2

    You create strong characters by giving them strong emotions. A character seen losing his temper is gunna be known for his anger...But when the reader or audience sees a character that was once known for his anger be 'humbled' this instills an emotional response between them and your character. This is because instead of expecting them to be normally a certain way, a dynamic situation has changed them to respond differently. Plays do a good job at displaying how a protagonist can shift his personality over time as he ages through the story. Usually tragedies can show this too.

    • @MrReaperofDead
      @MrReaperofDead 4 роки тому

      With that being said, any emotion given to a character should at times be exaggerated, this makes them memorable. (Like a shy character acting extra shy for no reason, or a pompous character getting mad and becoming extra pompous after he was given a cheap receipt for his purchase.)
      That way if you plan on dynamically changing your character over time, there will be a stronger response from your readers and audience.
      Ex. Thr pompous man may be offended by a cheap receipt...But after seeing his friend being placed in a cheap shallow grave, he may be brought to tears and you'll see them humbled. Now the audience will generate a memorable emotion from that said character, and so on.

    • @shabeehhaider2553
      @shabeehhaider2553 3 роки тому

      Another great example is Guts from Berserk manga

  • @Numba003
    @Numba003 5 років тому +44

    Hey! I hope you have a good day! Jesus Christ be with you friend!😊

  • @JMBPro
    @JMBPro 4 роки тому +5

    "I'm ok with females working on my engine" one way of saying it...

  • @SysterYster
    @SysterYster 5 років тому +15

    But Frodo doesn't leave Sam... in the books. Only in the movies. He still needs to realize that he needs Sam, but he never pushes him away. Apart from that you have many great points. :)

    • @sikid4000
      @sikid4000 5 років тому +5

      I didn't like that they added that since it made Frodo seen pretty dumb.

    • @SysterYster
      @SysterYster 5 років тому +3

      @@sikid4000 I agree. I was quite put out by that.

    • @willowweedsYT
      @willowweedsYT 4 роки тому +3

      They do have a falling out in the book too and I think in the movie it doesn't make him look "dumb" it serves to show how the ring and Gollum is influencing him, trying to force away the person who Frodo needs to succeed.

    • @sikid4000
      @sikid4000 4 роки тому +1

      @Laurens Brettschneider You could say the ring had an affect on him making that decision but Gollum manipulating him with or without the ring's influence makes Frodo seem pretty stupid. Either way the added drama was unnecessary. The only way it works is it raises the stakes a little when Frodo gets captured considering they were on bad terms and now their friendship is at stake. I guess that was probably Peter Jackson's thought process. The issue is it diminishes Frodo's intelligence that he had in the books. I actually watched the movies first so it used to never bother me but after the reading books I find it hard to watch that scene.

    • @therockingvolbeat3630
      @therockingvolbeat3630 4 роки тому +1

      @œ æ " sam doesn't know how spider venom works and that's first grade science" well considering hobbits wouldn't be going to first grade then it's understandable and realistic that he wouldn't know it

  • @chvp4605
    @chvp4605 6 років тому +9

    That was great and super helpful,thank you!!💕🙌🏻✨

    • @ThinkStory
      @ThinkStory  6 років тому +1

      Thanks for watching :)

  • @Nemmy72
    @Nemmy72 4 місяці тому +1

    Heroes: Eventually accept their need, and put aside their want if it need be
    Villians: Entierly unable to accept their need and put their wants over all else

  • @williamhunter8773
    @williamhunter8773 4 роки тому +3

    This formula TRULY explains WHY I hate a lot of the movies I hate. You actually put it into words for me. This has been most insightful. Thank you

  • @kokichiyoursupremeleader.1713
    @kokichiyoursupremeleader.1713 4 роки тому +4

    1:34 that’s so true and I feel that there are a lot of media that forgets that and you hardly even see any true noticeable internal conflict.
    But one thing you for to mention with that is that both are necessary and important.
    And usually with an internal conflict there’s an external and vise versa. (Doesn’t mean that the vise versa gives a good internal conflict to the external one)
    And another thing with that want is that people want to (normally fan work and mostly Gacha) do is give their character all these external conflicts and all these awful things that happened to them.
    I think an important trait for a writer is to know when it’s enough and adding something will make it too much.
    4:00 personally they’re both needs. You can’t write it without a basic understanding on what’s gonna happen. Therefore without even a little bit of an idea for plot. (You don’t even need to have it all planned out) you can’t develop on themes.
    4:06 this one is complete fact all the way. What makes something amazing is it’s heart.
    Teen titans and teen titans go.
    There are a lot of reasons why the original is better but one of the most important and possibly overlooked reason is the amount of heart that’s given into the original. You can see how well written the characters are you could see that there was a lot of thought in it
    They are making an original vs go but in all honesty is it really the original coming back.
    By the trailer it’s obvious it doesn’t have the heart that made the original the original.
    What Go seems to aim for is the nonsense and silliness, hoping this “fun” aspect will appeal to kids. And the thing is it can be fun and silly but it needs to have heart and meaning.

  • @bn3099
    @bn3099 4 роки тому +3

    This is pretty complicated actually, I think if I watch a lot of times I'll understand lmao but good video man, very very useful especially for beginners in writing

  • @FlavioColombini
    @FlavioColombini 6 років тому +8

    Thank you! This video is very well done! I loved it!