@@xbytesolutions I saw one one study referred recently which had about 600 respondents of which, IIRC, 77% were going to open source solutions, mostly KVM (probably via RedHat/Canonical/SUSE), and about 12% to Hyper-V... I don't remember the source unfortunately, or whether this was "will go/are in the process" or "thinking of...". I know one customer which is hit pretty "hard", in that they have quite a few two-node vSAN-based clusters running mostly on ROBO licenses... maybe more or less a worst case scenario with respect to the recent changes.
Funtional difference between Essentials Plus and Standard version is a Storage vMotion and basic 2 vCPU Fault Tolerance features, which you didn't mention. Small set of funtions, but still it's included in Standard.
Yes, thank you for pointing that out. We did not include all the missing features - Per-VM EVC (Enhanced vMotion Capabilities) is another feature not in Essentials Plus. If you want the full breakdown of all the features, you can checkout www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/docs/vmw-datasheet-vsphere-product-line-comparison.pdf
@@xbytesolutions Per-VM EVC (Enhanced vMotion Capabilities) -> Is this the ability to vMotion across CPU generations by setting a minimum gen limit that all CPU would support, or is this an additional feature on top of being able to do that? We were using Enterprise Plus before on 10 hosts, that we replace every few years on a cycle, so EVC vMotion becomes critical to our ability to manage a cluster, if Standard doesn't support this and we need foundation, the quotes I just got basically doubles our cost from last year. So it becomes an important feature if we need to maintain that feature. Also, Standard doesn't have Distributed Switches, which we use, but we can reconfigure around it if we have too.
@@brianhayes2863 Unfortunately that is only available in Foundation. Here is a handy chart that shows the features and the compatibility - Please reach out if you need any assistance navigating options - www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/docs/vmw-datasheet-vsphere-product-line-comparison.pdf
Just a suggestion...why not include the MSRP of each option? The Essentials Plus with its 96 core minimum is a very expensive option for a small shop that has say 1 or 2 Servers with 8 cores on each. In this case it would be must more cost effective to go with Standard even though the price per core is more.
Here is a link to a Veeam Blog post that does a good job of walking through the financials of the new packages. With the minimum core count of 16 per processor and Essentials Plus only sold as package per 96 cores, you have to do a little mathing to make sure you are choosing the best option for now and near-term growth. community.veeam.com/blogs-and-podcasts-57/decoding-the-new-broadcom-vmware-vsphere-licensing-packages-for-small-deployments-6398
I have a question regarding VMware's licensing policy. Previously, I purchased a perpetual license for VMware version 8, but recently VMware has changed its policy from perpetual licenses to annual subscriptions. I’m wondering if, with my current system, switching to a subscription license means I need to reinstall the entire VMware system, or can I just add the new license?
There should be no need to re-install vSphere. You simply add the new key to the host(s), or vCenter if present, then assign to the host(s). The key thing to ensure a smooth transition is to make sure the new subscription licenses you obtain have all of your currently enabled features and making sure the correct number of cores are tied to the license, including the 16C per socket minimum.
If we are understanding your question - if you have to be a CSP for VCF? If that is what you are asking, you can get VCF without being a CSP. However, if you're a CSP you only get the VCF option
Good question - Pre-Broadcom, you could mix different tiers of vSphere licenses within the same vCenter for anything Standard and above; however, we can't find anything concrete post-Broadcom. We asked our distributor to see if they had an answer, but those answers have been extremely slow recently. We did find an argumentative Reddit post about the subject you can read for fun! • www.reddit.com/r/vmware/comments/1aen5uo/mix_of_vmware_by_broadcomlicenses_on_same_vcenter/
@@xbytesolutions according to two different vendors I work with you cannot mix licenses now. Talk about another dumb decision Broadcom has made. VMware will be missed.
Broadcom have just said goodbye to us and many more partners without doubt.
The big question is where is everyone going to go?
@@xbytesolutions I saw one one study referred recently which had about 600 respondents of which, IIRC, 77% were going to open source solutions, mostly KVM (probably via RedHat/Canonical/SUSE), and about 12% to Hyper-V... I don't remember the source unfortunately, or whether this was "will go/are in the process" or "thinking of...".
I know one customer which is hit pretty "hard", in that they have quite a few two-node vSAN-based clusters running mostly on ROBO licenses... maybe more or less a worst case scenario with respect to the recent changes.
If you are looking for alternatives, here is a recording of a Q&A we just held talking about options for customers: www.xbyte.com/vmware-qa/
Funtional difference between Essentials Plus and Standard version is a Storage vMotion and basic 2 vCPU Fault Tolerance features, which you didn't mention. Small set of funtions, but still it's included in Standard.
Yes, thank you for pointing that out. We did not include all the missing features - Per-VM EVC (Enhanced vMotion Capabilities) is another feature not in Essentials Plus. If you want the full breakdown of all the features, you can checkout www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/docs/vmw-datasheet-vsphere-product-line-comparison.pdf
@@xbytesolutions Per-VM EVC (Enhanced vMotion Capabilities) -> Is this the ability to vMotion across CPU generations by setting a minimum gen limit that all CPU would support, or is this an additional feature on top of being able to do that?
We were using Enterprise Plus before on 10 hosts, that we replace every few years on a cycle, so EVC vMotion becomes critical to our ability to manage a cluster, if Standard doesn't support this and we need foundation, the quotes I just got basically doubles our cost from last year. So it becomes an important feature if we need to maintain that feature. Also, Standard doesn't have Distributed Switches, which we use, but we can reconfigure around it if we have too.
@@brianhayes2863 Unfortunately that is only available in Foundation. Here is a handy chart that shows the features and the compatibility - Please reach out if you need any assistance navigating options - www.vmware.com/content/dam/digitalmarketing/vmware/en/pdf/docs/vmw-datasheet-vsphere-product-line-comparison.pdf
Just a suggestion...why not include the MSRP of each option? The Essentials Plus with its 96 core minimum is a very expensive option for a small shop that has say 1 or 2 Servers with 8 cores on each. In this case it would be must more cost effective to go with Standard even though the price per core is more.
Good suggestion - We'll get with the sales team and post the MSRP (assuming we are allowed to)
Here is a link to a Veeam Blog post that does a good job of walking through the financials of the new packages. With the minimum core count of 16 per processor and Essentials Plus only sold as package per 96 cores, you have to do a little mathing to make sure you are choosing the best option for now and near-term growth. community.veeam.com/blogs-and-podcasts-57/decoding-the-new-broadcom-vmware-vsphere-licensing-packages-for-small-deployments-6398
Here is a link to a follow-up video we just did that focuses on pricing - ua-cam.com/video/H0f_p6-QgAs/v-deo.html
@ishkabibble6719 Tagging you so you can see the replies with more information on pricing (links in comments)
I have a question regarding VMware's licensing policy. Previously, I purchased a perpetual license for VMware version 8, but recently VMware has changed its policy from perpetual licenses to annual subscriptions.
I’m wondering if, with my current system, switching to a subscription license means I need to reinstall the entire VMware system, or can I just add the new license?
There should be no need to re-install vSphere. You simply add the new key to the host(s), or vCenter if present, then assign to the host(s). The key thing to ensure a smooth transition is to make sure the new subscription licenses you obtain have all of your currently enabled features and making sure the correct number of cores are tied to the license, including the 16C per socket minimum.
Its been fun. Hello Hyper-V
Absolutely NOT hyper-v loool
Are you maintaining CSP partner level with VCF ?
If we are understanding your question - if you have to be a CSP for VCF? If that is what you are asking, you can get VCF without being a CSP. However, if you're a CSP you only get the VCF option
Can I load VVF and VSS licenses into the same vcenter?
Good question - Pre-Broadcom, you could mix different tiers of vSphere licenses within the same vCenter for anything Standard and above; however, we can't find anything concrete post-Broadcom. We asked our distributor to see if they had an answer, but those answers have been extremely slow recently. We did find an argumentative Reddit post about the subject you can read for fun! • www.reddit.com/r/vmware/comments/1aen5uo/mix_of_vmware_by_broadcomlicenses_on_same_vcenter/
@@xbytesolutions according to two different vendors I work with you cannot mix licenses now. Talk about another dumb decision Broadcom has made. VMware will be missed.
@@scotimus What other vendors are you thinking about moving to?
Rosella Greens
Buckridge Shores
Bye Bye VMWARE, welcome PROXMOX.
Theron Lodge
Robb Gardens
Koby Tunnel
VMware goodbye
Yundt Point