COMMON FAULTS IN CONCRETE DESIGN USING RCDC SOFTWARE..

COMMON MISTAKES IN CONCRETE DESIGN FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES USING STAAD AND RCDC..In this video we will learn how to correct some mistakes in the design.
For practice, you can download the staad file here:
drive.google.c...

[@bernalesmichaeljorge376]

Salamat uli Sir. Ang laking tulong po samin nito

[@BARTLANTV]

Thanks for your time watching the video guys.. I'm thankful you learn something.

[@christine7-v3f]

Thank you!

[@hansonhenson1633]

nice sir! very informative

[@BARTLANTV]

Thanks for watching the video..

[@al-yamenamal9719]

Sir paano maka salit ulit sa group page mo? Kasali ako noon pero nawala ang account ko 😢

[@jimmyjavar4784]

Normal lang ba sir na malalaki column section sa two storey? 350x500 nasa 4mx5m ang span,

[@lmlengineeringsolutions2498]

kung tama ang pagkaintindi ko sir, pwede lang sa 250 na dimension sa column is 12mm rebar, pwede kaya taasan ko na lang ang grade ng steel like grade 60

[@BARTLANTV]

Kung gagawing 12mm ang column mag fail ito, kung remain as ease lang ang column pero ang beam rebar ay gagawing 12 mm lang, papasa sya kung gagawin mong 16 mm kailangan baguhin ang column size.... yung model naka attach pede mo i try sir...

[@lmlengineeringsolutions2498]

@@BARTLANTV cge sir, mas maganda nga kung i observe sa actual. thanks sa reply sir

[@petersmith5883]

Sir tanong ko lang po hindi talaga kasama ung windload?
Or sadyang hindi mo lang sinama kasi hassle sa pag manual compute?

[@BARTLANTV]

Yes hindi ko lang sinama.

[@jaylvasquez]

Sir pano po pag fail sa torsion irregularity, anong rectification?

[@loedtesalona3645]

how to solve column joint flexture failure in rcdc

[@amieljohnsantiago7321]

sir bakit kaya fail parin ang FTB ko kahit adjusted na yung column ko pero nag papass naman sya pag inuncheck ko yung ductility. kahit lakihan ko size ng FTB failed parin.

[@BARTLANTV]

@@amieljohnsantiago7321 Masyado stiff ang tie beam.

[@marcovillena9542]

Sir sa mga failing beams, ano effect if iuncheck po ductility para mag pass? Rather than increasing beam section

[@BARTLANTV]

If your structure is in zone 2, then you can uncheck ductility, but in zone 4, it is required to utilize the ductility property of reinforced concrete if it is part of main resisting frame, if not, you can uncheck ductility for not part of resisting frame.

[@nilavrobiswas3213]

thanks sir

[@BARTLANTV]

Thanks for watching i hope you learn a lot in this video...

[@vasubhadania]

i am using physical member and getting the error of column and beam missing....i have already assigned attributes in physical modeler....

[@BARTLANTV]

@@vasubhadania sa software, analytical modelling lang muna gamitin mo.

[@vasubhadania]

@@BARTLANTV sorry I can't understand the language...!

[@BARTLANTV]

@@vasubhadania There is problem with the software when physical modelling is concern. It would be ok if you use analytical modeller for the time being as the software is still being enhanced.

[@artpetercolinares]

Hello po sir. Baka po pwd foootbridge naman yung e.model nyo po? Yung para sa tawiran po nang ilog.

[@BARTLANTV]

Ok i'll try sir...

[@artpetercolinares]

@@BARTLANTV thank you sir. Hintayin ko yan sir.

[@arnellagante6123]

Sir. Baket NSCP po yung ginamit? Baket hindi po ACI? Please enlighten me po hahaha

[@lonewolfgaming01]

I noticed po you did not include Bending+axial force design?

[@BARTLANTV]

Yeah, even if included, the scenario would still be the same.

[@artpetercolinares]

Sir meron po ba kayo facebook group? Pwede po pa join?

[@BARTLANTV]

Thanks for watching the video, you can join in this group: facebook.com/groups/bart.alaba

[@artpetercolinares]

@@BARTLANTV thank you. Paki accept po ako

[@VencelNajarro]

Good eve sir..pa accept po sana sa group sir.