The Mother of the Messiah Cannot be a Virgin! -Rabbi Tovia Singer

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • Help us combat aggressive Jewish evangelism in Israel: outreachjudais...
    Let’s Get Biblical Study Guide (Volume 1 & 2) outreachjudais...
    outreachjudais...
    www.videvo.net
    Music: www.purple-pla...
    Music at the end: Adon Olam • ''Adon Olam'' (Eternal...
    www.toviasinger...
    #toviasinger #Judaism #Christianity #Messiah

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @LoreneRaeWard
    @LoreneRaeWard 29 днів тому +22

    This is great!
    Baruch HaShem!
    Todah Rabah Rabbi Tovia Singer for all you do!

  • @ranmatardis4236
    @ranmatardis4236 28 днів тому +23

    I have discovered my Jewish heritage thanks to Rabbi Singer.

    • @Chi-for-4
      @Chi-for-4 24 дні тому +1

      How? I’m from Turkey born and raised as a Muslim. Ever since learning about the history of the Middle East, I was wondering if my ancestors could be Jews or Christians.

    • @user-lc8bv2du3d
      @user-lc8bv2du3d 24 дні тому

      @@ranmatardis4236 u mean rabbinical Judaism

  • @ecomandurban7183
    @ecomandurban7183 28 днів тому +13

    Dear Rabbi, when I use your arguments on Christians here in South Africa they simply cave in and run.
    I hope one day to come to walk the streets of Jerusalem with you to debate with these Christian missionaries and win our people back.

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому +2

      I'm a Christian and I'm not running. The genealogy of Joseph emphasizes that Jesus inherits David. Even if Jesus didn’t share his DNA, he was Joseph’s adopted son and therefore the legal royal heir to David's throne.
      As for Jeconiah's curse that his offspring would not rule and he will not prosper (therefore Jesus having Jeconiah in his lineage couldn't inherit David's throne due to the curse)... that curse was either meant for his lifetime (in Jeremiah 22:30 it says that he would not see his descendants on the throne IN HIS DAYS), OR it was lifted due to his possible repentance. Proof for that, in Jeremiah 52:31-34 shows that (contrary to the curse) he prospered. Also his grandson Zerubabbel (1 Chronicles 3:16-19) became governor of Judah (Haggai 2:2, 23). Another proof that the curse was no longer valid is Matthew mentioning Jeconiah (he surely was aware of it but represented a non issue).

  • @charleslitherbury8600
    @charleslitherbury8600 29 днів тому +31

    Rabbi Singer almost karate chopped the motorcycle guy! God Bless!

  • @belindawolke7320
    @belindawolke7320 29 днів тому +22

    *Comment made.
    *Response given. *Commentator deletes comment and response.
    *Video made.
    AND THE WINNER IS!
    Tovia Singer

    • @tia8007
      @tia8007 26 днів тому +1

      We dont know bc he didnt show us proof, just claimed.

    • @narrowistheway77
      @narrowistheway77 24 дні тому

      Unfortunately his reward for his wanton deceptions will be eternity in hell. Not much of a prize worth seeking

  • @red2thebone
    @red2thebone 29 днів тому +28

    Go in on them rabbi tovia! Excellent answer! 🕎

    • @user-lc8bv2du3d
      @user-lc8bv2du3d 23 дні тому

      @@red2thebone Matthew written in Aramaic wrongly translated in Greek Joseph the Husband of Mary is the Gawra of Miriam a father, male protector, kinsman redeemer usually not husband- can be uncle- a few lines later Mary betrothed to her husband Joseph her Baalah- Tovia or you don’t know Aramaic

  • @bettyk8105
    @bettyk8105 28 днів тому +5

    Rabbi Singer, I used to listen to you on Arutz Sheva and then started following you on UA-cam. My husband and I were delighted to meet you a few years ago, right outside Mahne Yehuda, and took pictures. Last week I was so happy that your name came up in conversation during a Torah class we occasionally attend! Glad to know you are making waves!

  • @user-ym5dv7dc6r
    @user-ym5dv7dc6r 29 днів тому +45

    I grew up in the Christian dogma. I enjoy listining to you. I am 70 an will soon find out.

    • @ANewBeggining-so1wp
      @ANewBeggining-so1wp 29 днів тому +7

      Keep at least he commandments in the Torah, including His Shabbat's. Most Israel is still in exile without identity. Moshiach will bring them back, maybe you are also of Israel. Shalom!

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому

      @@ANewBeggining-so1wp Gentiles are not allowed to keep Jewish commandments.

    • @nicolegallagher4319
      @nicolegallagher4319 29 днів тому +10

      No need to wait, use some critical thinking and discovered the truth now that Christianity is idolatry.

    • @user-wd7ex4gr6b
      @user-wd7ex4gr6b 28 днів тому +4

      @@ANewBeggining-so1wp : In
      the meantime, remember that non-Jews aren't obligated to observe the Sabbath - it's a covenant between God and the Jewish people.

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +5

      @@ANewBeggining-so1wp
      Only Jewish people are obliged to the 613 Mosaic Laws.
      Everyone on Earth is obliged to obey the seven Noahide laws, given to all humanity in the first nine chapters of Genesis. HTH. 🕊❤️

  • @LoveAcrossAmerica
    @LoveAcrossAmerica 29 днів тому +124

    I'm in agreement with this. I had to stop identifying as a Christian because of their nonsense theology and disregard for The Torah.

    • @susanlett9632
      @susanlett9632 29 днів тому +29

      Same here!! So thankful I left that mess called Christianity!

    • @HisMessenger-wf5qd
      @HisMessenger-wf5qd 29 днів тому +2

      So what exactly are you identifying as now?

    • @HisMessenger-wf5qd
      @HisMessenger-wf5qd 29 днів тому +1

      ​@@susanlett9632What are you identifying as now?

    • @user-wd7ex4gr6b
      @user-wd7ex4gr6b 29 днів тому +15

      That's GREAT!!! You've joined THOUSANDS of us who have also left ALL forms of false, pagan, man-made, blasphemous, idolatrous, replacement theology "Christianity", that absolutely did NOT come from God!!
      May Hashem continue to bless you, and give you much courage, wisdom and strength for your new spiritual journey!!!

    • @outlawgt3045
      @outlawgt3045 29 днів тому +5

      They don't even follow their own doctrines..

  • @commentsedited
    @commentsedited 29 днів тому +27

    Always informative and well stated from tovia singer..Definitely a plus for those who are seeking truth and knowledge..

  • @bookmouse2719
    @bookmouse2719 29 днів тому +31

    thank you Rabbi

    • @twitherspoon8954
      @twitherspoon8954 29 днів тому +1

      According to the Bible, Joseph had two male parents (Heli and Jacob).
      Who was Joseph's father? From which of David's sons was Jesus descended, Solomon or Nathan?
      Solomon?
      "David the king begat Solomon ... and Jacob begat Joseph the husband of Mary, of whom was born Jesus, who is called Christ."
      (Matthew 1:6-16)
      Or Nathan?
      "And Jesus ... Jesus was known as the son of Joseph. Joseph was the son of Heli.... who was the son of Nathan, who was the son of David."
      (Luke 3:23-31)

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +3

      @@twitherspoon8954
      Jesus likely never existed at all.
      If Jesus existed, his parentage doesn’t matter really because he was an ordinary man who, if the nt writers reported his words accurately, was either delusional or deliberately attempting to lead Jewish people away from the Torah.
      If your mom is Gentile, obey the Noahide laws, given in the first nine chapters of Genesis. 🕊❤️

  • @amandavpj
    @amandavpj 28 днів тому +9

    For God nothing is impossible!

  • @SilviaSumberaz1
    @SilviaSumberaz1 29 днів тому +43

    Wow another beautiful video from Jeruzalem, thank you so much ❤

  • @davidd.c.9545
    @davidd.c.9545 29 днів тому +12

    Thank you very much!!

  • @eddie990ee
    @eddie990ee 29 днів тому +28

    This shows that the NT has been written most probably by Greek scholars who had no idea about Jewish traditions, They couldn't have been the actual Jewish disciples roaming in Jerusalem at that time

    • @thatguy3468
      @thatguy3468 28 днів тому +11

      The New Testament is a product of the Roman Empire. Constantine gave explicit instructions to the council of Nicaea who’s job it was to create a new religion. Some of the most antisemitic writings are found in the New Testament as well, this is because the Roman Empire hated the Jews as they fought back against the occupation of Jewish land by the Roman Empire.

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +2

      I agree that the nt was written by a highly educated group of people for that time period. It could possibly have been written by one person, but he would have been a singular intellect.
      At that time, almost everyone was what we might term “functionally illiterate.”
      However, whoever wrote the nt was familiar with Torah because he/they had the Jesus character say the loving parts of the Torah and contradict the difficult parts of the Torah. He/They also threw in a bit of Greek aestheticism.
      He/They were diabolically clever, for the Jewish people were nearly destroyed.
      As we know, though, “Behold the Guardian of Israel will neither slumber nor sleep” (Psalm 121 v 4).✡️❤️

    • @christymeredith452
      @christymeredith452 26 днів тому

      @@AdaraBalabustathey new nothing of jewish traditions. Thus the whole reason they claim jesus was jew yet did and taught things not jewish. 😂

    • @vincentzoldak6
      @vincentzoldak6 26 днів тому

      Correction Constantine didn’t say make a new religion at all. Also the New Testament is not anti semitism. People twisted it and when I say people; I mean people who are anti semitism. When someone hates a group, race or culture they twist a persons words or something that happened to fit there hate agenda to harm people. Jesus was born a Jew, his followers were Jews. Jesus died for everyone’s sins; past present and future people. The Romans executed Jesus. People who hate Jews chose to blame the Jews for his death but those that do forget that he died for everyone’s sins. The New Testament is the story of Jesus life, Paul letters, how the early Catholic Church got started (which at the time Catholics were called Christian’s at the time because not everyone excepted and believed Jesus as the messiah, the savior, the son of God

    • @vincentzoldak6
      @vincentzoldak6 26 днів тому

      So not a product of the Roman Empire. Plus the Roman Empire was also trying to wipe out the Christian’s
      For a very very very long time

  • @jondonohue-l2v
    @jondonohue-l2v 26 днів тому +3

    Rabbi Tovia, I as a Christian enjoy listening to you, I don’t agree with you but I believe that God parted the Red Sea and provided protection for Israel with a cloud by day and a fire by night and I believe God spoke to Balaam by a donkey. These I believe through faith and that God made Adam from dust. I can tell by listening to you that you are very intelligent and will pray that you see God moving to protect Israel by divine intervention not the wisdom of man. God Bless you my friend !!!

  • @SinghRoadwayS
    @SinghRoadwayS 29 днів тому +8

    When you read Ezakiel 18:20 "The one who sins is the one who will die. The child will not share the guilt of the parent, nor will the parent share the guilt of the child. The righteousness of the righteous will be credited to them, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against them", it becomes clear that the early Christian writers did not read Old Testament very well, how can God send his so called son to die to our sin, when he does not agree for this.

    • @Navarrofernandes24
      @Navarrofernandes24 22 дні тому

      YESHAYAHU 53

    • @SinghRoadwayS
      @SinghRoadwayS 22 дні тому

      @@Navarrofernandes24 don't talk about that, talk what I'm referring to, God can't be contradicting himself.

  • @kashrut18
    @kashrut18 29 днів тому +13

    Once again, a rock solid, bombardier of a demolition of Christianity's savior.

    • @user-wd7ex4gr6b
      @user-wd7ex4gr6b 28 днів тому

      @@the_basest_of_men : The "NT" you quote from is absolutely NOT scripture that was given to mankind by God, and it blasphemously preaches AGAINST what God said to us at Mt. Sinai. The Christian "OT" is only a twisted, mistranslated, taken out of context, bastardized VERSION of what God ACTUALLY said to us there!

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +2

      @@the_basest_of_men
      “Revelation” is a fictional booklet placed at the end of a series of fictional booklets. The only true parts of the booklets are the bits of Tanach placed here and there to lend verisimilitude.
      If your mother is Gentile, obey the Noahide laws, found in the first nine chapters of Genesis. 🕊❤️

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому

      He didn't demolish anything for he is wrong.

  • @1963luftwagen
    @1963luftwagen 28 днів тому +5

    when I was in a Christian theological school, I had a person ask me about conflicting stories regarding Judas. I looked it up and realize this person was correct! Which point I felt the freedom to start questioning all of the inconsistencies such as this and many others and had to come to realization that, something was inherently wrong, which led me out of Christian. It's hard to be this level of honest with yourself when your whole life has been dedicated to something.

    • @olanrewajuadagba955
      @olanrewajuadagba955 28 днів тому +2

      Good day, @1963luftwagon. I have read your response, and I kindly request that you specify the verses or chapters that you have referred to as containing "conflicting stories regarding Judas". Could you kindly provide me with the specific verses? Thank you.

  • @ThomasPatton12
    @ThomasPatton12 13 днів тому +1

    I'm Scottish. I live in northern California. I hear the voice of "hshem" for a long time now. He has been prepping me. I wondered about my bloodline being of David. I found this today. Certain royal families in Europe, such as the Stuarts of Scotland and the Bourbons of France, have also claimed Davidic ancestry, though these claims are highly speculative.
    Hshem tells me I will join you in the Holy Land on sukkots 2024. Your meshiach will be there. Shalum, thank you, FATHER

  • @hrvatskinoahid1048
    @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +12

    Mashiach is a human being, born in normal fashion of human parents. The only qualification about his origins is that he is a descendant of King David, through the lineage of his son Solomon. From his birth onwards his righteousness will increase continually, and by virtue of his deeds he will merit sublime levels of spiritual perfection.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +3

      @@MichaelMallwitz-u9n He has to liberate the entire biblical land of Israel from the Nile to the Euphrates.

    • @KononR-gz4vo
      @KononR-gz4vo 28 днів тому

      ​@@hrvatskinoahid1048 - 🤔Where does it say the Messiah will do that from the Nile to the Euphrates?

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 28 днів тому +3

      @@KononR-gz4vo Genesis 15:18: "On that day, the Lord formed a covenant with Abram, saying, "To your seed I have given this land, from the river of Egypt until the great river, the Euphrates river."

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 28 днів тому

      @@pettuleipäpappi The new covenant says nothing about the first one being obsolete.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 28 днів тому

      ​@@pettuleipäpappi I should accept Jesus because God gave Israel to the Jews? No wonder Jews win the Nobel prizes.

  • @OnlyOneG-d
    @OnlyOneG-d 29 днів тому +29

    HASHEM would not impregnate a betrothed woman. It's against HIS own law 🥴

    • @FatherVampire
      @FatherVampire 28 днів тому +1

      So also are a lot of things "HASHEM" did in the OT, including murder on a massive scale multiple times, both personally and vicariously through Israel's armies... killing the guilty and the innocent, alike (e.g., multiple Canaanite cities viciously and mercilessly attacked and their peaceful populations slaughtered during the Conquest of Canaan).
      The point here is not to indict "HASHEM"... but to point out that for His purposes, He can and often has been above His own Law. Thus, if (more accurately, when) a first-generation hybrid son is required, He has sired Him to accomplish that key purpose (a la Genesis 6:4). And, yes, Yeshua ("Jesus") was one of those... but His mission here was not a Christian one; He was NOT the "Messiah," was NOT the "Savior", and never started a new religion.
      As Yeshua stated, He was "sent unto none but the Lost Sheep of the House of Israel." What the World will never know is exactly who and what those "Lost Sheep" were... and still are today. And they have not Thing One to do with either religion or spirituality. It all has to do with... bloodline... and the Mystery of the Kingdom of God on Earth that Yeshua talked about, yet never revealed to those falsely claiming to be His "apostles"... hence why that Mystery is never revealed in the Gospels or elsewhere.

    • @MoshehYinon26
      @MoshehYinon26 28 днів тому +1

      See Deuteronomy 22:22, Leviticus 20:10

    • @FatherVampire
      @FatherVampire 28 днів тому

      @@MoshehYinon26 ... Very aware of both of these... and I think Deut. 22:23 is more specific to the situation with Mary. However, both of these are commandments given to and specific for men:
      22 If a MAN is discovered in bed with a married woman...
      23 If a virgin is engaged to a man and another MAN meets her in the city and goes to bed with her...
      Tell me, is God a "man"?
      However, neither of these address the point I raised... that God repeatedly disobeyed His commandment, "Thou Shalt Not Murder" (Exodus 20:13).

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +1

      Yes. I always had a problem with that doctrine after I learned how children were “begotten.”
      When I was a student at BYU, I was taught in my nt class that Mary was a polygamist-married to G’d for eternity and to poor old Joseph for time only. I kid you not! 😳

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +1

      @@FatherVampire
      No worries! If your mom is a Gentile, obey the Noahide laws. 🕊❤️

  • @sd26362
    @sd26362 28 днів тому +6

    Great explanation of why Jesus is not from the House of David!

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому +1

      Not great at all. The genealogy of Joseph emphasizes that Jesus inherits David. Even if Jesus didn’t share his DNA, he was Joseph’s adopted son and therefore could have legally inherited the legal right to David's throne.
      As for Jeconiah's curse that his offspring would not rule and he will not prosper (therefore Jesus having Jeconiah in his lineage couldn't inherit David's throne due to the curse)... that curse was either meant for his lifetime (in Jeremiah 22:30 it says that he would not see his descendants on the throne IN HIS DAYS), OR it was lifted due to his possible repentance. Proof for that, in Jeremiah 52:31-34 shows that (contrary to the curse) he prospered. Also his grandson Zerubabbel (1 Chronicles 3:16-19) became governor of Judah (Haggai 2:2, 23).

  • @boneswigington4886
    @boneswigington4886 29 днів тому +5

    Rabbi you’re the best. Thank you so much for your videos, with all the knowledge you share

  • @matpieterse3287
    @matpieterse3287 29 днів тому +7

    Thank you Rabbi, love ❤️ your work Rabbi.

  • @DeanneSanchez
    @DeanneSanchez 29 днів тому +22

    Rabbi you are a RockStar
    I love listening to you
    This Deanne from Utah
    I’ve called in to the show
    And often listen to your other callers
    You are doing very important work
    God Bless you
    Please be Safe 🙏🙏🙏

  • @Franklin-qn5xj
    @Franklin-qn5xj 27 днів тому +4

    It's crazy how people that weren't there think they know the history of the world like this man. This is his opinion not fact. Was he there when the foundations of the earth were laid by jehovah, no. Jehovah knows the true history this world .

  • @andrealmeida9297
    @andrealmeida9297 29 днів тому +8

    You the best for tell us ! Thanks

  • @samfromisrael
    @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +7

    Goebbels quotes apply perfectly to Xtianity......
    _“It would not be impossible to prove with sufficient repetition and a psychological understanding of the people concerned that a square is in fact a circle. They are mere words, and words can be molded until they clothe ideas and disguise.”_
    ― Joseph Goebbels

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +1

      Certain people in the Traditionalist Catholic community revere Goebbels.

  • @johnanchovie2b
    @johnanchovie2b 24 дні тому +1

    Thank you, Rabbi, for your clarity and elucidation. You have helped me make sense of a life time of thought blocking contradictions. You are a good and blessed man.

    • @user-lc8bv2du3d
      @user-lc8bv2du3d 24 дні тому

      @@johnanchovie2b John Gospels were written in Aramaic- Matt genealogy Joseph the Gawra of Mary- kinsman redeemer, uncle, protector- a few lines down Mary is betrothed to Joseph her Baalah her husband proper- they are not the same Josephs

  • @Notthisagain28
    @Notthisagain28 28 днів тому +7

    As an ex-christian, I debunked Jesus' lineage a long time ago with the New Testament in more concise detail. Hearken to my explanation, please, you will be satisfied.
    Mary in the NT has no genealogy except for it being hinted at in Luke 1:34-36. The angel confirmed Mary is biologically blood related to Elisabeth. And Luke 1:5 clearly states that Elisabeth is descended from Aaron. Therefore, since Mary is blood related to Elisabeth, she also follows that lineage. So we can conclude Mary is descended from Aaron of the Levi tribe. There is no mention other than this of her genealogy.
    We can disregard her being descended from king David at this point as she is not mentioned anywhere in the NT that she was descended from him anyway. Now, even though Joseph is descended from king David, he is disqualified from having any affiliation with Jesus since he made no biological contribution to Jesus' birth as clearly mentioned in Matthew 1:22-25. Only after his birth did Mary and Joseph biologically "consummate." This is a clear indication that Jesus failed this messianic prophecy.

    • @danielmayer1977
      @danielmayer1977 28 днів тому +1

      Your claim that Mary’s connection to Elizabeth proves she’s from the tribe of Levi is speculative and not definitively supported by the text. The New Testament does not explicitly state Mary’s tribal affiliation. While Elizabeth is from Aaron’s lineage, this does not necessarily mean Mary shares the same lineage (Luke 1:36).
      Moreover, dismissing Mary’s Davidic descent overlooks the possibility that Luke’s genealogy could trace her lineage, connecting Jesus to David through her. Luke emphasizes that Jesus is the fulfillment of God’s promise to David (Luke 1:32-33), which implies a connection to David’s lineage.
      Regarding Joseph’s role, Jewish tradition places significant value on legal descent. Even though Joseph was not Jesus’ biological father, his legal fatherhood grants Jesus the rightful claim to the Davidic line (Matthew 1:20-21; Matthew 1:16), fulfilling the Messianic prophecies (2 Samuel 7:12-16).
      Finally, the prophecies of the Messiah are fulfilled not just through biological descent but through the unique circumstances of Jesus' birth (Isaiah 7:14; Matthew 1:22-23), His legal inheritance, and His divine mission, all of which the New Testament presents as fulfilling the requirements for the Messiah (Romans 1:3-4; Luke 3:23-38).

    • @Herschel1738
      @Herschel1738 28 днів тому

      @@danielmayer1977 Isaiah 7:14 The woman in this prophecy was described as an almah (the Hebrew word for "young woman of childbearing age") not a virgin (betulah (בְּתוּלָה) in Hebrew).
      While one may be hopeful that all young women of marriageable age are, indeed, virgins, not specifically stating that fact when it is the most significant part of the story would make it a bad prophecy and a stupid thing to do.
      Also, the only significance the child she bears will have is to mark the date when the armies of Ephraim & Syria will no longer threaten to attack Judah, which will happen "before the child knows to reject the bad and choose the good'"
      This verse in Isiah is one of the most egregious distortions of Hebrew scripture that Christians use.

    • @danielmayer1977
      @danielmayer1977 28 днів тому

      @@Herschel1738
      In Isaiah 7:14, the term "almah" is generally understood to mean "young woman of childbearing age" and does not exclusively mean "virgin" in Hebrew. However, in the cultural context of ancient Israel, an unmarried "almah" was typically assumed to be a virgin. For example, in Genesis 24, Rebekah is described as an "almah" (Genesis 24:43) when Abraham’s servant seeks a bride for Isaac. Just a few verses earlier, she is explicitly identified as a "betulah" (Genesis 24:16), meaning "virgin." This suggests that "almah" in contexts like these implied virginity. The Greek Septuagint, a Jewish translation of the Hebrew Scriptures into Greek completed centuries before Christ, translates "almah" in Isaiah 7:14 as "parthenos," which specifically means "virgin." This translation indicates that early Jewish interpreters understood "almah" in this context to imply virginity.
      The prophecy in Isaiah 7:14 is indeed set within a specific historical context, addressing King Ahaz during the threat from Ephraim and Syria. This prophecy likely had an immediate fulfillment in Isaiah’s time, possibly referring to a child born during that period. Many scholars agree that biblical prophecies often carry both an immediate application, relevant to the contemporary audience, and a future, more significant fulfillment. Within the Christian tradition, Isaiah 7:14 is viewed as having its ultimate fulfillment in the birth of Jesus, whom the New Testament presents as Emmanuel, "God with us" (Matthew 1:22-23).
      The concept of dual fulfillment is not unique to Christian interpretation; it also exists within Jewish tradition. For example, in Jewish eschatology, the prophecies concerning the Messiah often have multiple layers. Isaiah 11, which speaks of a future Davidic king who will bring peace and justice, has been understood historically to refer to Hezekiah or another righteous king in the line of David. However, it is also seen as pointing forward to the ultimate Messianic figure expected by Jews. This illustrates that the idea of prophecies having both immediate and distant applications is a shared interpretive approach.
      It's important to recognize that different traditions approach these texts in various ways. The suggestion that the Christian interpretation of Isaiah 7:14 as a prophecy of the virgin birth distorts Hebrew Scripture overlooks the longstanding Jewish tradition of interpreting prophecies with multiple layers of meaning. The Christian perspective builds on this tradition by seeing the prophecy as part of a larger messianic expectation fulfilled in Jesus, while fully acknowledging the prophecy's original historical significance.

    • @Notthisagain28
      @Notthisagain28 27 днів тому +1

      What is your rebuttal? Actually, everything I said is the only supported text of evidence for Mary's lineage. Even the Quran is correct when addressing Mary as the daughter of Aaron of Levi; Sura 19:27-28. So even the quranic authors knew these bible verses I quoted.

    • @Notthisagain28
      @Notthisagain28 27 днів тому +1

      As I noted, read Luke 1:5 and luke 1:34-36 again. You ignored this explicit connection there of Mary's lineage. She is a descendant of Aaron of the Levi tribe. It's quite clearly mentioned there. Ignoring key points in an argument means you have no argument against what I said there. And please don't speak to me like an AI debate bot, thanks.

  • @edwardkantowicz4707
    @edwardkantowicz4707 23 дні тому +1

    Absolutely love the title, and find it so perfect. This statement is like the thread that unravels the whole blanket! Cheers Rabbi Singer

  • @MitzvosGolem1
    @MitzvosGolem1 28 днів тому +3

    Missionaries use circular reasoning which is futile.
    But nice normal people are unaware of these facts which they can verify.
    Excellent channel Thank you Rabbi .
    שלום

  • @avajoyporter9064
    @avajoyporter9064 28 днів тому +1

    Thank you for clearing this up. I appreciate you sharing your knowledge with us. God bless!

  • @Bepeace-loveOth3rs
    @Bepeace-loveOth3rs 29 днів тому +7

    Shalom Rabbi, i need help here, how to get Rabbi...i want to learn Torah but im alone, from Asia country

    • @ANewBeggining-so1wp
      @ANewBeggining-so1wp 29 днів тому +2

      Get the scriptures and start reading and don't forget to pray.

    • @Bepeace-loveOth3rs
      @Bepeace-loveOth3rs 29 днів тому

      @@ANewBeggining-so1wp you mean the Old Testement is the scriptures that bind with new testement

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +4

      @@Bepeace-loveOth3rs If you are a Gentile, you are obligated to learn the 7 Noahide laws.

    • @brynawaldman5790
      @brynawaldman5790 29 днів тому +7

      There is a UA-cam channel called Tanach Talk. Rabbi Tovia is on it, & other rabbis, as well.
      What might be nice for you is there is a translation, word for word, from the weekly parsha, from Hebrew to English. (A different rabbi from Rabbi Tovia goes over that, with the Tanach Talk host, William.). Maybe you already know; the weekly parsha is the same in synagogues all over the world. They go thru the Torah, but skip 2 sentences, & move to the next sentence when the new (Jewish) year begins. That way, in 3 years, they go thru the entire Torah. It puts the weekly parsha in sinc w the Jewish holidays to study Torah in this manner.
      Tanach Talk offers other videos as well. There are live shows where people can phone in & ask Rabbi Tovia direct questions. It's not the same as going to a synagogue but it's pretty close, if you use the UA-cam channel a lot.

    • @Bepeace-loveOth3rs
      @Bepeace-loveOth3rs 29 днів тому

      @@hrvatskinoahid1048 no iam.not gentile,

  • @miahdelaramalim2641
    @miahdelaramalim2641 27 днів тому +2

    The Mother of the Jesus as the Messiah must be a Virgin
    CCC 437 To the shepherds, the angel announced the birth of Jesus as the Messiah promised to Israel: “To you is born this day in the city of David a Savior, who is Christ the Lord.” From the beginning he was “the one whom the Father consecrated and sent into the world”, conceived as “holy” in Mary’s virginal womb.2 God called Joseph to “take Mary as your wife, for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Spirit”, so that Jesus, “who is called Christ”, should be born of Joseph’s spouse into the messianic lineage of David.

    • @davidkatz341
      @davidkatz341 3 дні тому

      You can believe whatever you wish. The New testament is a work of fiction but if you believe it's the work of God that's your business. But when Matthew says that the proof of Jesus is actually in the Hebrew scripture that's what we have to draw the line. Matthew couldn't read a word of Hebrew. He was using a Greek translation and he went through it to try to find things that sounded like it might apply to Jesus. But if you speak Hebrew you find that they're all complete nonsense. Christian scholars know this. However, they cannot admit it. If they do, then Matthew falls apart and fails and with it Christianity. That's why you get thousands and thousands of pages of endless arguments trying to explain Matthew 7:14 and Psalm 110 and Daniel 9 and Isaiah 53 and on and on and on and each one of them more scandalous than the rest. You seem like you really love God. May I suggest spending the next 6 months of your life learning basic Hebrew? It really will change your life.

  • @joshuacruz5452
    @joshuacruz5452 29 днів тому +26

    I grew up in the Assembly of God my father was a preacher. You are correct

    • @user-lc8bv2du3d
      @user-lc8bv2du3d 23 дні тому

      @@joshuacruz5452 not true the genealogy of Matthew is Mary’s and in Aramaic uses totally different words Translated in Greek husband is used, not a husband at all -look before you leap

  • @chevaliersdesangreal2490
    @chevaliersdesangreal2490 28 днів тому +4

    Rabbi TOVI please come in capital of Iran Teheran . You will see nobody interon is against you or against Jews people 🕎❤🇮🇱❤
    SCHALOOM PEACE & SALAMALYKUM

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +2

      The average Iranian would likely have nothing against Rabbi Singer and just wants to live in peace with their neighbors. May HaShem bring us peace. ❤️

    • @chevaliersdesangreal2490
      @chevaliersdesangreal2490 28 днів тому +1

      @@AdaraBalabusta AMEN 🙏

  • @m1244r
    @m1244r 26 днів тому +9

    Hi, I'm a Catholic from Italy and I promise I won't delete the comment. Maybe someone like me has already answered, I didn't check, but the argument doesn't make much sense, because the evangelists Matthew and Luke, authors of these genealogies, themselves affirm that Mary conceived by the work of the Holy Spirit. In Matthew, in the same chapter of the genealogy, it is said three times, first by the angel of the Lord to Joseph (Mt 1:20), then through the prophecy of Isaiah (Mt 1:23), then by the author directly and equally explicitly in verse 25.
    In any case, you speak very well and it's a pleasure to listen to you.
    Praise be to Jesus Christ

    • @lotooky4461
      @lotooky4461 25 днів тому +2

      So Joseph was not the father. The Jewish messiah is from the house of David. You can call him your Christian messiah but not the Jewish one.

    • @lim7lim
      @lim7lim 25 днів тому

      You're arguing for immaculate conception. This video addresses a different issue. The whole idea of a Messiah, is one born from the House of King David, who belonged to the tribe of Judah (out of the 12 tribes of Israel). It is his "identity" if you like - before any other trait or divine workings. There have been other people divinely touched throughout history and written about in the Bible. But they are not claimed to be the Messiah. It is the genealogy of the Messiah that is a prerequisite for the title.
      And since it is the male line that determines the tribal lineage, if Jesus has no human father, the whole claim to the House of King David- which the Church tries very hard to establish- is completely irrelevant.

    • @m1244r
      @m1244r 25 днів тому

      @@lotooky4461 For Catholics, the New Testament and the Holy Scriptures in general are important, but so are Tradition and the Magisterium of the Church. Now, for the last two, not only Joseph, but also Mary is of the House of David... and not only of David, but also of Aaron. Because the Messiah is King and Priest, according to our interpretation and according to a broader vision of the messianic promises contained in the Tanakh/Old Testament. In fact, Tradition has given us the names of Mary's parents, that is, Anna, descendant of Aaron, and Joachim, descendant of David (we celebrate them in our liturgical calendar on July 26). The Gospels do not say it explicitly, because the evangelists have to say many things and they have to do it in the most concise way possible. However, nothing in them is against this version that has been handed down to us, indeed, in the Gospels Mary appears as a virgin engaged to a man of the house of David, whose only known relative is Elizabeth, her cousin, mother of John the Baptist, who is married to a priest who officiated in the Temple.

    • @m1244r
      @m1244r 25 днів тому

      @@lim7lim Now I understand the speech better, the rabbi wanted to affirm that the Messiah must descend from David through his father and that even the evangelists with that genealogy try to justify this thing. So, according to you, Isaiah's prophecy of the virgin giving birth would not concern the Messiah but some other character or prophet.
      My answer is that the Church was founded by Jews and not all of them coming from the people, but also from the educated classes (Saint Paul, Nicodemus, Joseph of Arimathea, etc.). Now, they believed that Jesus had all the necessary characteristics to declare himself Messiah and be it, so I don't understand why two thousand years later he no longer has them. What the religious caste of the time, according to the Gospels, accused him of was not the lack of correspondence with the messianic prophecies (except for coming from Nazareth, from Galilee, which for them was inappropriate), but what they put him to death for were the miracles performed by Jesus on the Sabbath, and "for the blasphemy" of calling God his father, "- and because you, being a man, make yourself God - " (John 10:33).
      P.S. In Catholic theology, the Immaculate Conception does not refer to the virginal conception of Jesus, but is a concept that expresses the fact that Mary was created in the same conditions of sanctity in which Eve was in Eden before committing the sin.

    • @emilywyatt9340
      @emilywyatt9340 23 дні тому

      ​@@lim7limTrying to explain that to them is like talking to a brick wall😊. They can't handle it.

  • @donovanwint-im2ql
    @donovanwint-im2ql 28 днів тому +2

    Well done well said well developed well defined and delivered Rabbi Singer.
    How can anyone say they believe in the Bible and at the same time with the same breath TRY TO discount all THE FACTUAL POINTS you have laid out in this segment.

  • @muzaaffarsheikh2228
    @muzaaffarsheikh2228 29 днів тому +9

    I am a Muslim.I find your messages so logically inspiring.& as far as the genealogy of Jesus in christian bible is concerned, it truly sucks.& it is a frightening reality that millions of intelligent people over the world are born suckered to this stuff.Keep the good work going , Rabbi.We respect and love you.❤❤❤🎉🎉🎉🎉

    • @joshferns7114
      @joshferns7114 29 днів тому +3

      Islam claims that jesus is a prophet and that he will come back to judge. Jews reject jesus completely, even as a prophet. What do you have to say on this?

    • @terryulmer969
      @terryulmer969 29 днів тому

      ​@joshferns7114
      The One True Creator G_d gave specific details to the Hebrew prophets about when the Real Messiach comes. No One! Especially the so-called "Jesus" has fulfilled any of them yet!
      1. When the Real Messiach comes, he will be a normal man from the line of David through Solomon and will sit on the throne of David and rule from there forever.
      *Obviously, that hasn't happened yet!
      2. When the Real Messiach comes, it will be at the End of Days.
      * Obviously, back then was not the End of Days!
      3. When the Real Messiach comes, the Temple will be rebuilt never to be destroyed again, and The Messiach will start the animal sacrifices in the Temple again.
      * The opposite happened back then! The very fact that the Temple isn't standing proves that the so-called "Jesus" is Not The Messiach!
      4. When the Real Messiach comes, Everyone around the world (including atheist) will know that he is The Messiach!
      * We KNOW that the so-called "Jesus" is Not The Messiach!
      5. When the Real Messiach comes, death will cease to exist.
      * Obviously, that hasn't happened yet either because so many people are still getting sick and dying.
      6. When the Real Messiach comes, there will be World Peace and weapons of war will be rebuilt into farming implements.
      * We're still waiting for that one!!!
      7. When the Real Messiach comes, Everyone around the world, from every language will grab the Jews and say "Now we know that we have inherited only lies and G_d has been with you Jews all along. Please 🙏 take us with you!"
      * We're still waiting for that one, too!!!
      No where in the Torah/Tanach does it ever say that the Messiach will keep failing and have to come back again and again. According to Christianity, the so-called "Jesus" already came back a second time, but he still never fulfilled any of those Prophecies about the Real Messiach. So now Christians are waiting for a third coming. Christianity strikes out again!

    • @KononR-gz4vo
      @KononR-gz4vo 28 днів тому

      ​@@joshferns7114 - They also claim Jesus is the Messiah, and the Hebrew scriptures have been corrupted. The Quran is the only true scriptures.

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +1

      Agreed. ❤️

    • @minooam7089
      @minooam7089 28 днів тому +1

      He never claimed to be a prophet. The doors of prophecy were closed after the destruction of the first temple. No more prophets after that time.

  • @rivkier7214
    @rivkier7214 28 днів тому +3

    christians say that man will be king of the world but royalty goes through the father not the mom and the tenak specifically says what line kings will come from

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому +1

      Legal and kinship standing was related to either genes or adoption or marriage. Even if Jesus didn’t share his DNA, he was Joseph’s adopted son and therefore inherited legal rights to David's throne.

  • @joannebrauer2688
    @joannebrauer2688 28 днів тому +2

    Love your logic and the running thread between various scripture

  • @arlenepalmeiranoblat2478
    @arlenepalmeiranoblat2478 29 днів тому +8

    BOA NOITE RABINO. SHALOM.

  • @Lonewolf-oh2qy
    @Lonewolf-oh2qy 29 днів тому +9

    Hello Tovia

  • @kellykonrad9273
    @kellykonrad9273 29 днів тому +15

    I have the same problem with xtians. I was talking to a catholic Bishop. He was trying to get me to come back to the j man. When I refused & told him why, he blocked me on Facebook & messenger.

    • @HisMessenger-wf5qd
      @HisMessenger-wf5qd 29 днів тому

      Was what you said to him that disgusting?

    • @amakrid
      @amakrid 29 днів тому +1

      @@HisMessenger-wf5qd The woman was speaking to a catholic Bishop and called Jesus a "j man". The good Rabbi appreciated that and he prized her with a heart.
      Why is it so difficult for you to understand?
      😉

    • @kellykonrad9273
      @kellykonrad9273 28 днів тому +2

      @HisMessenger-wf5qd I told the catholic Bishop he was wasting his time trying to get me to come back to the j man. I didn't say j man to the Bishop so as not to offend. I explained briefly how that trinity doctrine is not biblical, but pagan in origin. Therefore it is idolatry to worship or pray to the j man & I refuse to return to idolatry. I also mentioned that the j man means nothing to me. I guess I offended the Bishop. I do tend to be upfront with people when talking about the truth of the Hebrew scriptures. Perhaps my approach was wrong, but I have no patience when xtians try to get me to return to idolatry.

    • @HisMessenger-wf5qd
      @HisMessenger-wf5qd 28 днів тому

      @kellykonrad9273 When you say J man the J stands for Jew.... right?

    • @kellykonrad9273
      @kellykonrad9273 28 днів тому

      @@HisMessenger-wf5qdit stands for jesus

  • @samfromisrael
    @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +6

    *Another apt Goebbels quote to describe jesus and Xtianity.*
    _“Make the lie big, make it simple, keep saying it, and eventually they will believe it.”_
    ― Joseph Goebbels

    • @vincentzoldak6
      @vincentzoldak6 26 днів тому +1

      But historically there was a man named Jesus that existed and preached love and forgiveness

    • @vincentzoldak6
      @vincentzoldak6 26 днів тому

      Some will always believe in him as the savior and others won’t.

  • @mnamhie
    @mnamhie 29 днів тому +21

    I disagree with you, Rabbi. They are lying. They’re not stupid. They see what the text says, just like you and I do. It is crystal clear. There is no ambiguity. But clinging to their beliefs, whether by societal or familial pressures, is more important to them than realizing and admitting the truth.

    • @susanlett9632
      @susanlett9632 29 днів тому +19

      I once identified as a Christian and I believed everything these pastors told me. I don't think the average layperson in the church knows because as soon as I realized that the so-called New testament completely I was Torah teaches I started asking my pastors and my Sunday school teacher is a lot of hard questions and they did not like it! I think the pastors and the people who went to Bible college absolutely know the truth but they want to believe this lie so much they practice something called doublethink like in the book 1984 by George Orwell. They completely believe two opposite things at the same time and they believe them both completely. It's called indoctrination it's called brainwashing and it's called severe mental illness. I ran from Christianity as fast as I could and became a Noahide! When your religious authorities that you have known for years and you trust tell you something you assume they're telling you the truth. Huge mistake! It's really sad what Christianity has done to this world.

    • @milkrabbit4109
      @milkrabbit4109 28 днів тому +3

      Jesus is the Messiah, born into David's lineage as promised, and you use the immaculate conception as an argument against his divine legitimacy... So you would rather have David's sin stained heritage than God as the king? Look at God's warning to Israel when they ask Samuel for a king... It is not you they have rejected, but me. Non the less, God sends his Son, able to heal and undo every sin passed down the generations, who defends the Mosaic law to its fullest, who declares death conquered, to be a King that is different from the previous suppressors, one who exalts the oppressed and makes no demands but for his people to love one another and be humble enough to forgive and be forgiven, to change for the better and to listen to God. He is the true leader of Israel. All his original disciples are Israeli descendants, and God will ensure their right.

    • @marksingleton7199
      @marksingleton7199 28 днів тому +4

      Under the law set out by God through Moses, Tovia is correct.
      You have to separate the church from Jesus.
      The church was used politically to gain control of an empire that was falling apart.
      Read about the early church and the arguments between the different factions.
      Peter, Paul, Mary, etc.
      Let me ask a question.
      Why would God set up the disciples and give them the Holy Spirit, for them to sit in a boat fishing because they did not know or understand what happened.
      When God talked to Moses, he wrote it down. When Joshua took on Moses mantel, he had everything recorded.
      As of yet, there is no testament written as Jesus spoke.
      There is nothing said by Jesus that is not in Torah.
      The symbolism is the same.
      If you take the Torah symbolism, the pass over meal means something completely different to that preached by the church.
      Jesus never said I am God.
      He said he talked to his father.
      Revelation takes most of its symbolism from Isaiah and Ezekial.
      Why would that happen?
      If you understand the Torah, you understand what is being referred to in the gospels. This is because Jesus understood the laws.
      The church inadvertently took the old testament to the world.
      It is just that they did not understand it.
      The Internet has allowed people to see the truth.
      The false prophets are those who seduce you to follow the preacher.
      The one who says follow God and test what I say, is the truth.

    • @mnamhie
      @mnamhie 28 днів тому

      @@milkrabbit4109 your response is filled with assumptions and you have absolutely no evidence to support veracity. First of all Jesus was not born of a virgin. There is no way that you can confirm this other than by blindly believing two contradictory and wildly discrepant reports in the New Testament. They both say that according to prophecy blah blah blah. But there is no prophecy of a virgin birth. Anyone with a rudimentary knowledge of Hebrew knows that this was not a prophecy for 700 years in the future. It was a sign for King Ahaz in that place and time. And common sense would tell you that even if Jesus had no biological father, that fact alone would disqualify him from being the Messiah. The Messiah comes from the line of David. Without a biological father Jesus is disqualified. The truth of the matter is that you are blindly believing a Roman invention. Things like virgin births were quite common in Graeco-Roman and pagan religions, and it seeps into the Roman’s creation of Christianity. Finally, believe the words of the Almighty. The Tanakh is replete with warnings that God is NOT a man. Move away from polytheism and the Roman invention of Christianity. Worship the Lord God Almighty, who is one.

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +2

      @@milkrabbit4109
      Mary is the “immaculate conception,” not J-dude. The term “immaculate conception” refers to Mary’s having been conceived without the taint of “original sin.”
      See? You don’t even understand/know what you allegedly believe.
      I don’t believe any of the idolatrous mess any longer.
      Jesus likely never even existed. If he did exist, Jesus was conceived in the usual manner.
      G’d gave everyone the seven Noahide laws in Genesis. 🕊❤️

  • @mindtalk8314
    @mindtalk8314 28 днів тому +2

    Thanks for clearing up that mess in the New Testament. I was so confused.

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому

      Lol, he's wrong. The genealogy of Joseph emphasizes that Jesus inherits David. Even if Jesus didn’t share his DNA, he was Joseph’s adopted son and therefore the legal royal heir to David's throne.
      As for Jeconiah's curse that his offspring would not rule and he will not prosper (therefore Jesus having Jeconiah in his lineage couldn't inherit David's throne due to the curse)... that curse was either meant for his lifetime (in Jeremiah 22:30 it says that he would not see his descendants on the throne IN HIS DAYS), OR it was lifted due to his possible repentance. Proof for that, in Jeremiah 52:31-34 shows that (contrary to the curse) he prospered. Also his grandson Zerubabbel (1 Chronicles 3:16-19) became governor of Judah (Haggai 2:2, 23). Another proof that the curse was no longer valid is Matthew mentioning Jeconiah (he surely was aware of it but represented a non issue).
      ISAIAH 7:14 "Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign. Behold, A VIRGIN SHALL CONCEIVE, and bear a son"

    • @mindtalk8314
      @mindtalk8314 26 днів тому

      @@criss6945 you have got yourself all confused. There is no Hebrew word for virgin in the Hebrew bible. That is something added to the Greek and English translations.

  • @WH6FQE
    @WH6FQE 29 днів тому +8

    The geneology issue is what caused me to stop believing in their myth.

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому +1

      Jesus fulfilled more than 300 prophecies from the Old Testament regarding Messiah. STATISTICALLY speaking, the possibility of him not being the Messiah is basically zero.

    • @WH6FQE
      @WH6FQE 26 днів тому

      @@criss6945 he fulfilled not a single prophecy actually of the messiah. The “prophecies” you say he fulfilled are misquotes, poor translations, and mainly proof texting

    • @WH6FQE
      @WH6FQE 26 днів тому

      @@criss6945 So, if he was the messiah, there is a surefire way to prove it. The prophecy says that when the messiah comes there will be no more wars . . . oops, that didn't happen. The scripture says that everyone on the planet will know God and the Torah . . . oops, once again, that didn't happen.

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому +1

      ​@@WH6FQE The Hebrew Scripture even if doesn't mention adoption as legal procedure BUT Joseph registered Jesus as his son. He was present when Jesus was born in Bethlehem - where Joseph went to register with Mary, who was pledged to be married to him and was expecting a child. Cesar Augustus issued a decree that all people should be registered and so they had to go to Bethlehem as Joseph was from the lineage of David. And while they were there, Mary gave birth to baby Jesus (Luke 2:1-7). So technically Jesus was considered Joseph' son and therefore had the right to inherit him.
      In Torah there's no legal adoption BUT there's cases where some people considered the children they raised as their own even if they were born from the relation of their partner with someone else. Abraham, before the birth of Ishmael and Isaac, took in consideration for his slave Eliezer to be his son (Ge 15:2-4). Also, both Rachel and Leah considered their handmaids' children with Jacob to be their sons - "born upon their knees" (Ge 30:3-8, 12, 13, 24) Those children inherited Jacob just like the ones born with his legal wives.
      And we have the Talmud that says that those who raise the child of another are considered as if they gave birth to them.
      🫳🎤

    • @criss6945
      @criss6945 26 днів тому

      @@WH6FQE Zechariah 14 : 9 describes a time when the Lord will reign as king over all the earth, and all nations will come to Jerusalem to worship Him which is what will happen at the second coming of Jesus. The Revelation of John mentions the one thousand years when saints will reign with Jesus, after his second coming, for a thousand years. That's the time when no more wars will happen. So it's still pending prophecy.

  • @Sami-nt2oc
    @Sami-nt2oc 29 днів тому +1

    Thank you for sharing!

  • @dimakelly
    @dimakelly 29 днів тому +8

    thank you rabbi

  • @jillengland3277
    @jillengland3277 29 днів тому +8

    The teacher is quite funny, in a good way. By pointing out the flaw in the myth the whole boat should sinks.
    I met a rabbi in a dream once. Standing beside his desk in front of endless bookshelves. He asked me one question, “Are you going to go your entire life without learning a few traditions”? I stumbled on the words in my reply, because I had been negligent in this. Felt like I was in that uncomfortable spot that Adam and Cain had been in when they were asked a question.

  • @marybernadettefitz
    @marybernadettefitz 24 дні тому +1

    Thanks!

  • @steveclark8538
    @steveclark8538 29 днів тому +3

    TY Tovia! One of the many contradictions in Christianity. For more see: Concise Overview of the Critique of Jesus of Nazareth - DCS

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +2

      Thank you. I am always interested in a new source. ✡️❤️

  • @samfromisrael
    @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +4

    *Xtianity can be summed up in one simple well known phrase.*
    _‘Oh what a tangled web we weave/When first we practice to deceive,’_
    It comes from an early nineteenth century Scottish author, Sir Walter Scott, best selling writer of novels, plays, and poems.

    • @samfromisrael
      @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +2

      @@pettuleipäpappi *The Romans were known for stealing, modifying, and altering the religions and cultures of those they conquered.*

    • @samfromisrael
      @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +2

      @@pettuleipäpappi Africa is your home, don't leave.

    • @samfromisrael
      @samfromisrael 29 днів тому +2

      @@pettuleipäpappi the NEW Africa, just like the *NEW* testimonium opium.

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +1

      I love Scott. ❤️

  • @matpieterse3287
    @matpieterse3287 29 днів тому +4

    A spirit(blown into Mary) , allegedly, has zero messiah prophecy backing and no fulfillment.

    • @Mari-vq8ki
      @Mari-vq8ki 26 днів тому

      U mean the wind blowing through your empty brain. Jesus fulfilled more than 300 prophecies from the Old Testament regarding Messiah.

    • @matpieterse3287
      @matpieterse3287 26 днів тому

      @Mari-vq8ki you are speaking according to fantasy. According to Jews all as witness to that study, your idol, jesus, whom were amongst many other Jews that were also crucified by the romans; jesus was no messiah at all. All prophecies that you mentioned are not the Jewish messiah.
      The pictures that have been indoctrinated into your mind do not exist in the real world.
      The paganism christiandom is far from prophecy. When something that the Jews warned about happens, then I suppose "fools for jesus" will have idolatry tantrums.
      Ironically, you can't exactly blame Jews for not being all ready at the same time when they're defending themselves. (Which includes christiandom)

    • @matpieterse3287
      @matpieterse3287 26 днів тому

      @@Mari-vq8ki that fake-it-till-you-make-it isn't a good ending for false religion.

  • @shellyw5892
    @shellyw5892 26 днів тому +11

    Jesus is the way the truth and the life

    • @nicholasyoung2794
      @nicholasyoung2794 25 днів тому +1

      Sometimes God didn't make things easy to understand chaff versus wheat

    • @laserbera19
      @laserbera19 24 дні тому +1

      Prove it

    • @nicholasyoung2794
      @nicholasyoung2794 24 дні тому +1

      @@laserbera19 When you know you know if you don't you don't. if you do your life is different, if you don't your life is still ?'s of why and then your end is ? and where does that put you.

    • @shellyw5892
      @shellyw5892 24 дні тому

      @@laserbera19 if you seek Him (Jesus) you will find Him - just knock and the door will be opened to you. Once you invite Him into your life your life will never be the same again. It’s truly something so wondrous and amazing. I can’t fully explain it, you’ll have to see it for yourself and know. But I will say this; you won’t ever regret it

  • @genevieverinzler8674
    @genevieverinzler8674 29 днів тому +2

    Thank you Rabbi ❤

  • @daffodilfleur
    @daffodilfleur 29 днів тому +9

    This morning I just answered an individual’s question regarding Jesus’ genealogy and I got deleted by moderators. I didn’t delete it.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +3

      We only remove offensive comments.

    • @daffodilfleur
      @daffodilfleur 29 днів тому +1

      @@hrvatskinoahid1048 What was offensive?

    • @tshou520
      @tshou520 29 днів тому +3

      It was probably the algorithm. It gets me from time to time.

    • @KononR-gz4vo
      @KononR-gz4vo 28 днів тому +3

      Removed by the moderator, or, UA-cam?

    • @KononR-gz4vo
      @KononR-gz4vo 28 днів тому +2

      Could you please re-post your answer but in different words? Provide sources, please🤔

  • @stevenxiaofenghuang
    @stevenxiaofenghuang 28 днів тому +2

    The point that made me realize that Christianity cannot be true, is when I saw how insane the doctrine of the trinity is. That was the point for me when the ice broke. Rabbi Singer found another point, the virgin birth, that is also a point, maybe for other people, for their ice to break.

  • @ytsi7505
    @ytsi7505 29 днів тому +3

    2:03 the תלמוד בבלי in חגיגה discusses that it’s permitted for a כהן גדול to marry a בתולה שעיברה so even if a virgin gets pregnant it’s not divine it’s like the case of אמבטיא so why do Christians automatically believe that the false virgin birth is divine?

  • @lesaheliorahavramsonkarapo4211
    @lesaheliorahavramsonkarapo4211 27 днів тому +1

    Thank you Rabbi for that astounding message!. Yes! Just look it up in the scriptures. If you are sincerely seeking the truth, HaShem promised that you would find it. See for yourself. Baruch HaShem!

  • @amakrid
    @amakrid 29 днів тому +3

    This must be truly the core of the spirit of Rabbinism.
    * We don't care whether he is doing miracles. What really concerns us is that he is doing them on the Sabbath day and thus he is violating the Law.
    * We don't care whether he was born from a virgin. What really concerns us is that he hasn't a biological father, so he can't be from the House of David, so he can't be the Messiah.
    This is a precious jewel. Thank you, Rabbi Tovia Singer!

  • @testimonies888
    @testimonies888 4 дні тому

    41 Now while the Pharisees were gathered together, Jesus asked them a question,
    42 saying, “What do you think about the Christ? Whose son is he?” They said to him, “The son of David.”
    43 He said to them, “How is it then that David, in the Spirit, calls him Lord, saying,
    44 “‘The Lord said to my Lord, “Sit at my right hand, until I put your enemies under your feet”’?
    45 If then David calls him Lord, how is he his son?”
    46 And no one was able to answer him a word, nor from that day did anyone dare to ask him any more questions.
    Matthew 22:

    • @davidkatz341
      @davidkatz341 3 дні тому

      You know the only person who would actually write a narrative where rabbis didn't know how to answer this question are people who cannot read Hebrew and who never asked a knowledgeable Jewish person to explain it. Do you want me to explain it to you? I mean it's going to really upset you to find out that one of your main go to Jesus arguments is an absolute deception by the church. Actually, in fairness there's a little more to it than that. It's quoted in Matthew but Matthew couldn't read Hebrew. So he was working with a Greek translation and I think he was not malicious. I believe Rabbi Singer thinks that Matthew did a deliberately at maliciously. I don't agree with that. Matthew just didn't know. Christians today are completely aware of how this is mistranslated and they still perpetuate it. Why would they do this? How can that be? Because if they simply tell the truth then Matthew falls and with it the rest of Christianity. It's the same thing in Isaiah 7:14. There are volumes written to try and explain another mistranslation. Again, not Matthew doing it maliciously just out of ignorance. The church can't say it. So there are cottage industries trying to explain this stuff away. Anyway, back to my first question. Do you want the explanation or would you rather just be happy and pretend Jesus is God?

  • @jt36048
    @jt36048 28 днів тому +3

    Thank you Rabbi, your words are words of life and wisdom. May HaShem bless you and bless the IDF in your battles.

  • @dimakelly
    @dimakelly 29 днів тому +3

    , at least the prophets wrote their prophecy into text. From Jesus we have nothing from his own hand. Somehow he himself didn't thought his teachings where that important."

  • @FatherVampire
    @FatherVampire 28 днів тому +2

    THANK YOU, Rabbi Singer!!! YES... this is the exact same point I have made innumerable times to Christians, as well. And, as always, I get two responses to this:
    1. They attempt to claim Joseph supposedly adopted Jesus, for which there is no evidence (one verse saying others considered Jesus as Joseph's son is not proof of formal adoption), and that assumed adoption satisfied the patrilineal Davidic requirement for the Messiah, which is impossible given adoption doesn't grant any such (and, further, makes that key Messianic requirement virtually worthless given anyone could simply make the same claim); or
    2. Luke's genealogy for Joseph is actually Mary's genealogy, which is not what Luke clearly says! And, most tellingly of all, violates the patrilineal Davidic requirement... and also the millennia-old tradition of making any royal claim conditional on patrilineal descent, not matrilineal. (The problem here for Judaism's claimed future Davidic Messiah is equally bleak given there haven't been patrilineal descendants of King David for at least 2,000 years ... and no amount of "tradition" can circumvent this historical fact.)
    And specific to that last damning fact for Judaism, also... as the Messiah MUST be a patrilineal descendant of King David, you obviously can't be a patrilineal descendant of King David without a biological father who also is! And that means, that father CAN'T be God... and, obviously also, the mother CAN'T be a virgin!
    Additionally, we have to add to this what I call the Christ Conundrum: Either Jesus was the literal begotten Son of God, in which case He couldn't have been a patrilineal descendant of King David... or else He was somehow the Davidic Messiah, in which case He couldn't have been the literal begotten Son of God. What Jesus could NOT have been... is BOTH!
    Such a no brainer! And yet, Christians to this day still don't... or won't... see this!

    • @minhazali4090
      @minhazali4090 28 днів тому +3

      Luckily, John and Mark did not write genealogies. Or else, Jesus would be having 4 different grandfathers.

    • @FatherVampire
      @FatherVampire 28 днів тому +1

      @@minhazali4090 ... Well, at least Joseph would. hehehe

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 28 днів тому +5

      @@minhazali4090
      The weird thing is that J-dude would be his own father if the trinity thing were real. 😳

  • @tayoayodele7239
    @tayoayodele7239 24 дні тому +3

    Beware of blasphemy against the holy Spirit

  • @alexjohnson9630
    @alexjohnson9630 25 днів тому

    I am very glad for you. The Jewish people need more like you. I wish there was A Tovia Singer that deals with islam like you do with christianity.

  • @edrozenrozen9600
    @edrozenrozen9600 29 днів тому +13

    Everyone knows Darth Vader is his father.

    • @KingDavid1979
      @KingDavid1979 29 днів тому

      Yossef Ben Jacob and Myriam princesse nazaréennes ( father and mother )

    • @OnlyOneG-d
      @OnlyOneG-d 29 днів тому +1

      😂😂

    • @tringalidangelo690
      @tringalidangelo690 29 днів тому +1

      Darth Vader repented so no.

    • @edrozenrozen9600
      @edrozenrozen9600 29 днів тому

      @@tringalidangelo690 did he? Did he really?

    • @bigtomboye
      @bigtomboye 28 днів тому +1

      Ah yes! I forgot!😮🤦
      Lol good one

  • @AlbertoPerez-s9p
    @AlbertoPerez-s9p 15 днів тому

    Why they call her Virgin Mary is because she was a woman who had a baby with out a man touching her people it was God who gave her a child and thats why she is blessed !

  • @sharonlee7111
    @sharonlee7111 29 днів тому +3

    🙏🎗🤍🇮🇱💙

  • @ibrahimyusuf2982
    @ibrahimyusuf2982 9 днів тому

    The way to overcome christians deleting their comments is by copying and pasting their comments in the response. They can't delete that.

  • @patrickbass3542
    @patrickbass3542 29 днів тому +3

    Thank you, Rabbi...now try explaining that to a "Southern Baptist minister"!!!!!!

  • @user-lc8bv2du3d
    @user-lc8bv2du3d 22 дні тому

    Ruth was a moabitess king David s great grandmother- Torah says no moabites allowed in - don’t tell me she converted- she can’t she’s wasn’t allowed to convert - Mother -Male is Pharisee rabbinics

  • @mdb1239
    @mdb1239 29 днів тому +3

    What does genealogy have anything to do with the virgin birth? Huh? Rahab and Ruth are in the genealogy of David. Rabbi isn't that SHOCKING?

    • @barrys.9040
      @barrys.9040 29 днів тому +1

      Because the real Messiah has to be from the Tribe of Judah. Tribal affiliation is from the father, so Rahab and Ruth aren't relevant to that issue.

    • @mdb1239
      @mdb1239 29 днів тому +1

      @@barrys.9040The Biblical genealogies say it is relevant and they have far more validity than your opinion. Joseph was Jesus's father. That make him part of the Tribe of Judah and of David.

    • @tshou520
      @tshou520 28 днів тому

      @@mdb1239 We don't know who jezues' father was. It could have been just about any man in the world *_except_* the husband of Mary.

    • @mdb1239
      @mdb1239 28 днів тому

      @@tshou520 Or it could be as the Bible says. The Almighty God was Jesus' father.
      That make the Lord Jesus a part of any genealogy including the Tribe of Judah and also be the son of David.

    • @tshou520
      @tshou520 28 днів тому

      @@mdb1239 No. That's silly. The messiah has to be a descendant of David, not the other way around. Besides, he did nothing messianic. We don't know who his father was, but it certainly wasn't the husband of Mary.

  • @testimonies888
    @testimonies888 4 дні тому

    26 In the sixth month the angel Gabriel was sent from God to a city of Galilee named Nazareth,
    27 to a virgin betrothed to a man whose name was Joseph, of the house of David. And the virgin's name was Mary.
    28 And he came to her and said, “Greetings, O favoured one, the Lord is with you!”
    29 But she was greatly troubled at the saying, and tried to discern what sort of greeting this might be.
    30 And the angel said to her, “Do not be afraid, Mary, for you have found favour with God.
    31 And behold, you will conceive in your womb and bear a son, and you shall call his name Jesus.
    32 He will be great and will be called the Son of the Most High. And the Lord God will give to him the throne of his father David,
    33 and he will reign over the house of Jacob forever, and of his kingdom there will be no end.”
    34 And Mary said to the angel, “How will this be, since I am a virgin?”
    35 And the angel answered her, “The Holy Spirit will come upon you, and the power of the Most High will overshadow you; therefore the child to be born will be called holy-the Son of God.
    36 And behold, your relative Elizabeth in her old age has also conceived a son, and this is the sixth month with her who was called barren.
    37 For nothing will be impossible with God.”
    38 And Mary said, “Behold, I am the servant of the Lord; let it be to me according to your word.” And the angel departed from her.
    Luke 1:

  • @flowersofthefield340
    @flowersofthefield340 29 днів тому +7

    Like King David .......... the Messiah is last born in his family and not born of a virgin 😂
    💋💌⏰️

    • @AdaraBalabusta
      @AdaraBalabusta 29 днів тому +2

      Interesting. Source?

    • @flowersofthefield340
      @flowersofthefield340 29 днів тому

      Read Pslams ........ and Isiah carefully
      Then Ring Rome....... ☎️ and the White House !!!!

    • @shamram6200
      @shamram6200 29 днів тому

      😅​@@flowersofthefield340

  • @ՆաթանիելՄաշ
    @ՆաթանիելՄաշ 19 днів тому

    It's a hard pill to swallow, I'm sure but it's the truth!

  • @user-tl4qg2gh1l
    @user-tl4qg2gh1l 29 днів тому +8

    It's amusing that having God as a father would disqualify Jesus from anything, but sorry Torah rules.

    • @frankmickeyumeh4303
      @frankmickeyumeh4303 29 днів тому +3

      every human being created by God almighty is a child of God, but when you claims that God has a special begotten son born by human being then turn around to force this begotten son on human genealogy is insane.😂😂
      we are bringing out the lies the devil inserted in the scripture.
      you should be happy about that.
      because you yourself can't prove from the word of God that God has a son.
      bcoz even jesus himself never calls himself son of God.

    • @terryulmer969
      @terryulmer969 29 днів тому +4

      The One True Creator G_d specifically said in no uncertain terms, who G_d's firstborn son is, and it sure isn't the Christian's so-called "Jesus"!
      Shemot (Exodus) 4:
      21The Lord said to Moses, "When you go to return to Egypt, see all the signs that I have placed in your hand and perform them before Pharaoh, but I will strengthen his heart, and he will not send out the people. כאוַיֹּ֣אמֶר יְהֹוָה֘ אֶל־משֶׁה֒ בְּלֶכְתְּךָ֙ לָשׁ֣וּב מִצְרַ֔יְמָה רְאֵ֗ה כָּל־הַמֹּֽפְתִים֙ אֲשֶׁר־שַׂ֣מְתִּי בְיָדֶ֔ךָ וַֽעֲשִׂיתָ֖ם לִפְנֵ֣י פַרְעֹ֑ה וַֽאֲנִי֙ אֲחַזֵּ֣ק אֶת־לִבּ֔וֹ וְלֹ֥א יְשַׁלַּ֖ח אֶת־הָעָֽם:
      22And you shall say to Pharaoh, 'So said the Lord, "My firstborn son is Israel." ' כבוְאָֽמַרְתָּ֖ אֶל־פַּרְעֹ֑ה כֹּ֚ה אָמַ֣ר יְהֹוָ֔ה בְּנִ֥י בְכֹרִ֖י יִשְׂרָאֵֽל:

    • @frankmickeyumeh4303
      @frankmickeyumeh4303 29 днів тому +1

      @@terryulmer969 Israel was the only nation God calls his son. see Hosea 11:1

    • @terryulmer969
      @terryulmer969 29 днів тому +2

      @frankmickeyumeh4303
      First born implies that there are other children. All people are children of The One True Creator G_d, but only Israel is G_d's firstborn. Hosea doesn't say "only"
      Hoshea 11:
      1For, when Israel was young, I loved him, and from Egypt I called My son. אכִּ֛י נַ֥עַר יִשְׂרָאֵ֖ל וָאֹֽהֲבֵ֑הוּ וּמִמִּצְרַ֖יִם קָרָ֥אתִי לִבְנִֽי:

  • @timb9257
    @timb9257 29 днів тому +5

    Joseph was the husband of a parent of Jesus, and his geneology matters. You missing the metaphor of adoption. And Jesus because he was begotton of God, from His bosom, eternal, and being Emmanuel, christians are adopted to Gods family, through Christ, the Light to the Gentiles.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +5

      Gentiles are obligated to keep the 7 Noahide commandments.

    • @Matthew_Scan
      @Matthew_Scan 29 днів тому +1

      After all wasn’t Moses adopted?

    • @u.y.3643
      @u.y.3643 29 днів тому +1

      😂😂😂

    • @timb9257
      @timb9257 29 днів тому

      @@hrvatskinoahid1048 I am agreeable to common sense civil law. The ethics given to man from God are the not monopoly of Judaism.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +2

      @@timb9257 Gentiles are obligated to fulfill the Seven Noahide Commandments because they are the eternal command of God, transmitted through Moses our teacher in the Torah.

  • @EuropeanResistanceFighter-z1k
    @EuropeanResistanceFighter-z1k 22 дні тому

    This is not a sidestep. I will look into it. I'm Christian, and currently involved in the English 'far right' as the communists would say. Even though we are losing our countries to socialism and Islam. Christianity and practicing Christians are still very much present. And it feels good that the Christian world of today adheres to the New Testamental guideline of freedom of religion to choose Christianity or not. To see Tovia freely criticize christianity, gives me goosebumps because it is a beautiful and awesome sight to behold. He is unharmed (as far as I know) even though he is surrounded by 100s of millions of Christians in his country. I tear up to the idea that Christ still lives within us and that we still listen to his good message. Because if 0.01% would ignore Jesus his teachings, to look for Tovia to do him harm, then Tovia wouldn't be safe to travel freely. 0.01% is a small minority, but a huge crowd of people (20 000).

  • @laurasilverstone9735
    @laurasilverstone9735 29 днів тому +4

    She was a virgin because THE BIBLE says and whoever says different is wrong

  • @DeanneSanchez
    @DeanneSanchez 29 днів тому +2

    Don’t pay any attention to all the negative comments don’t wast your breath .
    I appreciate the things that you teach it is really resonating to Me .
    I’ll always be a learner
    I live Gods word so very powerful 🤎

  • @sjv9147s
    @sjv9147s 28 днів тому +1

    Jesus' genealogy through Joseph is a topic of interest in biblical studies. The New Testament provides two genealogies for Jesus:
    1. Matthew 1:1-17: This genealogy traces Jesus' lineage through Joseph, his legal father, and shows Jesus' descent from King David and Abraham.
    2. Luke 3:23-38: This genealogy also traces Jesus' lineage through Joseph, but provides a different list of ancestors.
    The genealogy in Matthew emphasizes Jesus' royal lineage, connecting him to King David and the Hebrew kings. This genealogy includes some notable figures like Solomon, Hezekiah, and Josiah.
    However, it's important to note that Jesus' biological father is not Joseph, but the Holy Spirit, according to the New Testament (Matthew 1:20, Luke 1:35). So, Jesus' genealogy through Joseph is a legal or adoptive one, rather than a biological one.
    The early Christian church saw Jesus' connection to King David and the Hebrew scriptures as crucial for understanding his identity as the Messiah. The genealogies in Matthew and Luke serve to establish Jesus' credentials as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies.

  • @Se7enStars369
    @Se7enStars369 29 днів тому +5

    zeigeist explains very clearly who is Jesus = The SUN... every religion do the cult of SUN. THE ONLY GOD = GREAT ORB DELIVERER.

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 29 днів тому +3

      Worshiping the sun is idolatry.

    • @Se7enStars369
      @Se7enStars369 29 днів тому

      @@hrvatskinoahid1048 Says who?! read Isaiah 53:4-5 and you will see there is the SUN(Jesus) on the cross and even the name of YHWH in hebrew shows that: On a Cross Is Nailed The Highest One to Behold. Psalms 82:1 shows that too, till then... do more researches!

    • @hrvatskinoahid1048
      @hrvatskinoahid1048 28 днів тому +1

      @@Se7enStars369 The main prohibition against idol worship is not to serve one of the creations, be it an angel, a spiritual power, a constellation, a star or a planet, one of the fundamentals of the physical creation, a person, an animal, a tree, or any other created thing.

    • @bigtomboye
      @bigtomboye 28 днів тому

      That "documentary" was so awful lol
      Jesus isn't real, but the idea that Romans worshipped him as "the Sun" is BEYOND silly lol 😆 🤣 😂 😹
      "The Son"/"The Sun" only works in ENGLISH not Latin (or Greek etc)
      Lol
      No need for fancy fake word-games in order to reject Christianity

    • @Se7enStars369
      @Se7enStars369 25 днів тому

      Zoroaster Created Judeo Christian Religions

  • @zaniwoob
    @zaniwoob 23 дні тому

    The most insightful Jews of that time recognized the nature of the Roman Empire, understanding that its rule was grounded in extreme, utilitarian cruelty. They created a framework that provided refuge for traumatized and oppressed people, fostering a different kind of emotional development where empathy was more prominent. This framework focused on breaking cycles of violence by expanding Jewish religious principles into something accessible to everyone. In doing so, they laid the groundwork for more complex, interconnected societies by tempering the predatory instincts within human nature. The debates about the existence of God or Jesus, as well as the mystical aspects of faith, are ultimately irrelevant in this context."

    • @zaniwoob
      @zaniwoob 23 дні тому

      Given this perspective, it's clear that the true significance of these developments lies not in theological debates or supernatural beliefs, but in the profound social and psychological impact they had on society. The focus on empathy, inclusivity, and the breaking of violent cycles contributed to the evolution of a more humane and interconnected world. This shift enabled people to transcend the brutal realities of their time, fostering a sense of community and cooperation that was essential for the development of more advanced civilizations.
      In this light, the contributions of these early Jewish thinkers can be seen as foundational in shaping the ethical and moral frameworks that have guided human progress. Their efforts to create a more compassionate society, where the suffering of others is recognized and addressed, resonate far beyond the religious context. It is this legacy of empathy and moral evolution that holds lasting relevance, far more than any metaphysical or doctrinal disputes.

  • @menelikjanhoy2053
    @menelikjanhoy2053 29 днів тому +3

    " Seed of the Woman " have you ever heard seed from a woman. Other than in Genesis 3 .

    • @tshou520
      @tshou520 28 днів тому +2

      Yes. Hagar in chapter 16.

  • @Derekh_Pignataro
    @Derekh_Pignataro 2 дні тому +1

    Let's have a Jew to Jew discussion then
    What can we ascertain from Luke and Matthew?
    Joseph was Jesus' biological father, who is a descendant of David, thru either Solomon or Nathan.
    But if we follow back the Luke genealogy, we find Jesus' lineage as '.....Seth, son of Adam, son of G-d'
    So we can concede that Jesus is a son of G-d, thru his father Adam, the first man
    "But what about Mary the Virgin?"
    She was a Virgin Mother. As in, a Virgin Womb. As in, Jesus was her first born son of her virgin/maiden womb.
    As the L-rd decreed in Leviticus, He chose the tribe of Levi to be His, but He does retain the right to all the first issue of the womb, First Borns, to make up for the Plague of the First Born.
    And let's just touch on the prohibition of marrying an Egyptian. It's also prohibited that a Moabite will ever be excepted into the congregation, In Deuteronomy 23.
    But that didn't stop Him from making an exception for Ruth.
    I'd also point out that no where in Torah is it said that ones Jewishness comes from mom.
    I've heard another Rabbi claim that Jewishness comes from ones belief in the 13 Principles of Faith.
    But on the other hand, G-d told me that ones Jewishness comes from Him. So there is also that to consider. Like secular raised Baal Teshuvah.
    We are also coming from the perspective that Moshiach ben David comes after Moshiach ben Josef.
    Maybe we're wrong.
    Maybe Moshiach ben David proceeds Mosiach ben Josef.
    It's prohibited to marry an Egyptian, but we all know that the 13th Tribe, the Tribes of Josef exclusively retain Egyptian maternal descent, thru Asenath, daughter of the High Priest of On, Potifara.
    The L-rd has a tendency of making exceptions to the rule.
    Mary was not a literal Virgin. But the fetus of Jesus was conceived in her Virgin Womb.
    This is my opinion, based on my conjecture of studying Torah under Rabbi Moses and Rabbi Jesus

  • @jacobtack2258
    @jacobtack2258 27 днів тому

    Thank you for your explanation. I love listening to you, and enjoy your wisdom.
    I am not a christian, (I was one for more than 40 years). I then started to read the Bible for myself, and studied it. Now i do believe in the Torah of Yahuah(YHWH) and the Renewed Covenant.
    For me, i looked into many aspects of our Messiah and the prophecies of The Impalement of our Messiah Yahusha in Isa 53 and Ps 22. I believe there to be 191 fulfilled prophesies on the life, death, resurrection and ascension of Yahusha. There is evidence of a tremendous list of eye witnesses(1Cor 15) and His life and ministry. His miracles and even a list of History books of Jewish history and of NON Jewish History which mentions the life of a Jewish man which depicts our Messiah and His impalement.
    Some of these prophesies done more than a 1 000 years before His life. Impossible to have been put in place by man to deceive mankind. How do you explain that away?
    If you read the Renewed Covenant (not from a christian perspective) but from a Torah observant perspective, it does NOT contradict the Tanakh at all. On the contrary, it underscores the importance of Torah observance.
    Rom 3:31 Do we then nullify the Torah through the belief? Let it not be! On the contrary, we establish the Torah.
    The Torah will rule over us, all of our lives:
    Rom 7:1 Or do you not know, brothers - for I speak to those knowing the Torah - that the Torah rules over a man as long as he lives?
    For me it completes the Tanakh, because the Renewed Covenant fits like a hand in glove with the Tanakh.
    I hope you will reply to my question.
    Thank you and Shalom

  • @stephenarrigo5679
    @stephenarrigo5679 25 днів тому

    Rabbi or any follower, please explain how the Servant in Isaiah 49:5 [read below] can be Israel if He [The Servant] is commissioned to bring Israel back to Him?...
    Isaiah 49:5-6
    5] And now the LORD speaks the one who formed me [Jesus] in my mother’s womb [Mary] to be his SERVANT, who commissioned me [Jesus] to bring Israel back to him. The LORD has honored me [Jesus], and my God has given me [Jesus] strength 6] He says, “You [Jesus] will do more than restore the people of Israel to me. I will make you [Jesus]a light to the Gentiles [Christian], and you will bring my salvation to the ends of the earth.”
    Jesus in the Old Testament!!...
    Come to your Messiah!!

  • @koreyoneal2623
    @koreyoneal2623 27 днів тому

    According to the few quotes we have of The Ebionites , the original Hebrew Matthew and Luke which copied from it , didn't have the genealogies or the birth narrative . The Ebionites were the true followers of Yeshua , they obeyed His words and kept Torah but they didn't teach substitutionary atonement , it was His teachings that bring salvation , not His death on the cross , or the virgin birth or that Yeshua was Yeh Ho VaH The Father

  • @Tovo-XV5
    @Tovo-XV5 28 днів тому +1

    JESUS IS GOD 👑✝️🕊️

    • @bigtomboye
      @bigtomboye 28 днів тому +2

      😂😂😂😂🤡😂😂

  • @richardedgerton1852
    @richardedgerton1852 28 днів тому

    Two things:
    Firstly, Jesus came to prominence during age of Pisces and the sign opposite, balancing, was Virgo.
    Secondly, Jesus celebrated as born at winter solstice would have been conceived at spring equinox (spring, thhe virgin). St. John's day is summer solstice and would thus have been conceived at fall equinox (woman past child bearing age).
    These were subtext communications of the temporal solar cross as being the cross related to dying and resurrection of the light, and taking them as literal is a superstition that misleads.

  • @margaretwhite6677
    @margaretwhite6677 24 дні тому

    All Israel shall be saved 🙏

    • @frankkhethanidubedube919
      @frankkhethanidubedube919 16 днів тому

      From their enemies... look up the word save learn what it means in it'd proper context..

  • @A-childOfGod-pp4ge
    @A-childOfGod-pp4ge 28 днів тому +1

    YT deletes messages. It happens to me all the time, sadly

  • @wrlSivan16
    @wrlSivan16 28 днів тому

    “Then Jesus said to the crowds and to his disciples, “The scribes and the Pharisees sit on Moses’ seat, so do and observe whatever they tell you, but not the works they do. For they preach, but do not practice. They tie up heavy burdens, hard to bear, and lay them on people’s shoulders, but they themselves are not willing to move them with their finger. They do all their deeds to be seen by others. For they make their phylacteries broad and their fringes long, and they love the place of honor at feasts and the best seats in the synagogues and greetings in the marketplaces and being called rabbi by others. But you are not to be called rabbi, for you have one teacher, and you are all brothers. And call no man your father on earth, for you have one Father, who is in heaven. Neither be called instructors, for you have one instructor, the Christ. The greatest among you shall be your servant. Whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted. “But woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you shut the kingdom of heaven in people’s faces. For you neither enter yourselves nor allow those who would enter to go in. Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you travel across sea and land to make a single proselyte, and when he becomes a proselyte, you make him twice as much a child of hell as yourselves. “Woe to you, blind guides, who say, ‘If anyone swears by the temple, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gold of the temple, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind fools! For which is greater, the gold or the temple that has made the gold sacred? And you say, ‘If anyone swears by the altar, it is nothing, but if anyone swears by the gift that is on the altar, he is bound by his oath.’ You blind men! For which is greater, the gift or the altar that makes the gift sacred? So whoever swears by the altar swears by it and by everything on it. And whoever swears by the temple swears by it and by him who dwells in it. And whoever swears by heaven swears by the throne of God and by him who sits upon it. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you tithe mint and dill and cumin, and have neglected the weightier matters of the law: justice and mercy and faithfulness. These you ought to have done, without neglecting the others. You blind guides, straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel! “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you clean the outside of the cup and the plate, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence. You blind Pharisee! First clean the inside of the cup and the plate, that the outside also may be clean. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you are like whitewashed tombs, which outwardly appear beautiful, but within are full of dead people’s bones and all uncleanness. So you also outwardly appear righteous to others, but within you are full of hypocrisy and lawlessness. “Woe to you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! For you build the tombs of the prophets and decorate the monuments of the righteous, saying, ‘If we had lived in the days of our fathers, we would not have taken part with them in shedding the blood of the prophets.’ Thus you witness against yourselves that you are sons of those who murdered the prophets. Fill up, then, the measure of your fathers. You serpents, you brood of vipers, how are you to escape being sentenced to hell? Therefore I send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will flog in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, so that on you may come all the righteous blood shed on earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah the son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the sanctuary and the altar. Truly, I say to you, all these things will come upon this generation. “O Jerusalem, Jerusalem, the city that kills the prophets and stones those who are sent to it! How often would I have gathered your children together as a hen gathers her brood under her wings, and you were not willing! See, your house is left to you desolate. For I tell you, you will not see me again, until you say, ‘Blessed is he who comes in the name of the Lord.’””
    ‭‭Matthew‬ ‭23‬‬ ‭ESV‬‬

  • @HuggensCharles-b2m
    @HuggensCharles-b2m 22 дні тому

    Amen! The Messiah God provided to Israel and the word had a virgin mother (Myriam, young woman of Nazareth, from King David lineage) ; the messiah of Tovia and the rebels had an ordinary one.

  • @stephanboy2134
    @stephanboy2134 24 дні тому +1

    Lucas 1 , 26 - 56