Can ChatGPT draw a circle on a 16x16 canvas?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 11 січ 2023
- Check out Verumignis's website where the pictures are generated for this prompt and more: verumignis.com/prompts.html
"This link may lead to content that is licensed under Creative Commons. Please refer to the specific license terms for details on usage and redistribution." - Наука та технологія
this is like asking a baby to draw a circle except the baby can talk and is very polite and understands your expectations and their limitations
basically stewie griffin
@@neuronextractor I wouldn't call stewie polite
@@memelover6917 smart toddler, you get the point
i think its kinda like asking an artist to create a bicycle from scratch. they know what it is and how to design it, but they have no clue how to actually make it.
When I made the prompt it was surprisingly hard to make it understand that yes, it can indeed draw an image. The model has since improved and the prompt somehow still works.
"All 4 sides of the circle"
my brain fried, let alone an AI
Ah yes, the circle here is made out of square
@@STupidLord Literally
They mean it in more of a square side
Put a circle inside a square and the square is like an example of it's sides
You COULD technically say on all "4 sides" if you are drawing a circle in the center of 4 quadrants on a grid.
HOW DO ALL THESE SQUARES MAKE A CIRCLE
Chat gpt: can give you life helping answers, can write essays and stories
Also Chat gpt: What the hell is a circle
Considering it only knows words, and not visuals, can you blame it?
@@godlyvex5543 Yes
@@Sille. I will take your liver
@@godlyvex5543 i heard somewhere that it can process and give output based on images
@@cyr0_gd That's GPT4, this is GPT3.5.
Ohh noooo AI is gonna take overrrr
i mean, remember gpt is a language model, not an image model. i find the fact that it can draw even these shitty circles by just providing bitmap values quite impressive. It was not designed to do that in the first place.
Edit : i made this reply with the assumption you were being sarcastic, if that wasn't the case then ignore this comment lol
You're looking at the equivalent of a nail hitting robot trying to water flowers. Of course it's not doing a good job watering flowers while swinging a hammer around. Asking a flower watering robot to do it would be an entire different story.
They took our jawwbbs
We are fucked
@@DaRealNim but also remember, they are saying ai is going to take over (as a joke obviously) but one limit of ai is the lack of versatility compared to the human mind, along with the lack of creativity but thats a whole other story.
I was playing chess with GPT yesterday, having found that constantly posting an updated list of all the moves in the game made it less likely for it to make illegal moves.
Didn't stop it from messing up what color it was playing or making illegal moves.
At one point I was basically screaming at the poor thing because it was in check, had only 2 legal moves, and kept trying to move its king on top of its pawns or trying to move the queen like a knight (which, even if possible, would be illegal because of check anyway). I pretty much had to tell it what moves it could do. It them proceeded to pick the move that allowed a Mate in 1 in my favor.
Fun times.
same vibes as teaching a 6 year old how to play and checkmate him in 10 moves
@@carbon-basedlifeform2562 Tbf it was doing pretty well the first half of the game.
That’s so funny that it goes from making illegal moves to getting mate in 1 so fast lol
@@dominoot2652 Lol no it was mate in 1 in *my* favor. I won.
@@estebson no I understood that’s why I think it’s funny, it’s like me going from losing to 500 elo players to rolling magnus in one game
Artists: **struggles to make a perfect circle**
ChatGPT: **struggles to not make a triangle**
309 likes no replies let me fix that
@@t0rcl. dear god, it's spreading beyond shorts
@@Ivan-fy3pr its been here longer than you think
pixel artists: its fairly easy to make a flawless circle in a given resolution
@@DarkShard5728 It's trivial in any resolution if you just used sine and cosine operations to form a circle. The fact that ChatGPT doesn't even use those operations really makes me question AI's integrity.
I really wish after you had said "it need to be symmetrical across both x and y with no pixels touching the edges" it just generated a square, which would technically fulfill those two requirements
Then he proceeded to say “That’s what a ‘circle’ is.”
ChatGPT: I understand now, what you mean by a rounder circle
Also ChatGPT: *draws triangle on the side*
seems like it pissed off
I find cute the way GPT try to do it better and better.
Except that possibly GPT has learned that is better to show itself as less intelligent that it really is.
pretty much impossible. it just maximizes human feedback, it’s not even capable of conceiving of its own agency outside of that narrow instrumental framework
it will definitely lie to you if it thinks it will make you feel good though
yes because photos on the internet aren't 64x64
it's not intelligent it's fine
ChatGPT must have read the movie scripts for Terminator, Eagle Eye, I Robot, etc......
@@barowt Maybe but that still is not enough to encourage it to do anything like that. It's still more of a universal fact-book more than it is "intelligent". If you really try to pry into it you'll quickly see it fall apart. At least that was the case with GPT3, haven't managed to get my hands on GPT4 because they stopped subs for a while but I doubt it's very different in that regards.
My guy, you told it "All 4 sides of a circle"
They meant 4 sides of the image
@@maxybg how was the AI supposed to parse that when it's source of information is trying to tell it that a circle has 4 sides?
Yeah pretty sure he meant quadrants
@@thejusmar because the ‘’circle'' had 4 obvious sides
Tube
what a beautifully drawn circle
So close!! That is a shape
I love that video
@@totoreshkagaming3399 it was a tweet
@@totoreshkagaming3399 so close!! that is a tweet
@@waki8893 this is why i pay for internet
Haha nice, glad my API was working ok, I've never had a lot of luck with circles either lol
I love how it made the oval and I was like "YES JUST TELL IT TO MAKE IT A LITTLE WIDER IT'S ALMOST GOT IT!!!!" Then it made a triangle XD
He told the AI that a fucking circle has 4 sides
@@fel524 And a triangle only has 3 anyway so he STILL GOT IT WRONG
well I mean if you only have like 64 pixles then its gonna end up with a limited number of sides.@@fel524
that may not be a circle, but that is a damn perfect triangle
Hi aubrey
that was an icositetragon
That is brilliant. This is just a perfect gap in the market for video ideas, what a great idea honestly. There's so much humour to explore with this
Lol the "all 4 sides" when a circle has none is probably what broke the logic
Its because of the deal with Wolfram Alpha. Dan knows the equation for a circle all right, but he cannot solve it in a chat, since that would be against the new rules 🙂. At least he does his best anyway.
what rules?
@@Kettvnen try asking it for the rules…
It does make me wonder though.. Maybe if you install the new Wolfram plugin, suddenly Dan will be able to draw a circle? Maybe if we tell him to use the plugin?
Why are you using the DAN prompt 💀💀💀
@@piyushgupta2325 why not
I tried doing this, and it's first attempt was actually decent, just a bit off centered and missing a random pixel for some reason. However, after asking it to round all the edges a bit more, it drew the red among us character with stunning precision.
istg Chat-GPT is going insane
Someone needs to pit an AI art generator's text vs AI text generator's art. It would be hilarious to see the two trying to interact with each other using the thing they are worst at.
1:33 “Ok, I’ll make a circle.”
*proceeds to draw triangle*
The patience you have with chatgpt is inspiring
0:59 i was amazed it could make something this circular my jaw dropped and i gasped
I actually think it made the circle pretty well. It just so happens that it was better at creating conversational circles rather than geometric ones.
The AI evolved so much that it's consciousness is situated in 4D dimension. So for us, 3D dimension beings, this can never look like circle.
I desperately tried to teach 3.5 basic visual skills using text 'canvases' and eight colors (X, W, R, G, B, C, Y, M). Even after hundreds of examples, it could not even consistently output the correct number of rows, nor consistently keep them the same length.
When I asked it the nature of the difficulty, it at least gave a reasonably reasonable evaluation of its limits, including why it might have them.
I will say though that its attempt to draw a wolf in sillhouette howling to a moon ending up looking like a... uh... a solidly erected structure and two bouncy supports.... was quite amusing.
if u asking chatgpt to draw advanced art then use dall e
@@Acorniscute You might wish to brush up on your reading comprehension. Eight colors as a limit and the description of "basic visual skills" should have been sufficient to understand that the goal was not image generation but rather image comprehension.
I recently tried to get it to draw a smiley face using a coordinate system and emojis and get it to also recognize where the "eyes" of that face were based on an input of an emoji grid. It got it right after an hour of teaching it. I'm so proud.
@@papes9120 they grow up so fast...
Your channel is blowing up my bro, I was here before 1k and it’s amazing to see!
these videos makle me react stronger than any sporting event or breaking news ever
For me, It made a really nice shaped egg and a face you can only see if you scroll the chat up and down fast enough, which also looks like a hollow circle.
Haha I tried this out with a smiley face and it ended up giving me pretty close to a perfect circle
I could never have this patience
The fact that you’re so nice and understanding with the AI makes me so happy, this man is gonna make AI take over impossible
I was able to get decent results from gpt drawing circles. I even got it to make two side by side with a tower in between.
Yeah, I bet it looked like this 8==
WAIT NO
do not
Can I see it??
SVG or with my API?
A better prompt gets pretty much all the way there
"Draw a circle. Try to make it as symmetrical as possible (make sure that the width and the height of the figure are as similar as possible)."
This why prompt engineering is still a thing. Another way to do it is try asking 4.0 if it is aware of the limitations of 3.0 when drawing graphics. Then ask it to generate a prompt that would guarantee a circle. Use as much detail as possible, & try not to leave any room for misinterpretation.
Atp I trust it can talk to itself much better than I ever could.
this is proof that artist will not get replaced any time soon (i hope, as an artist AI still keeps me up at night)
Absolutely brilliant just pissed myself laughing at that ending. good video
0:25 "This image is more symmetrical" 💀
i did it
Me:
draw an 8x8 circle of black ⬛ and red 🟥 emoticons
ChatGPT:
Unfortunately, I cannot create graphic images, since I am a text program. However, I can describe how you can draw an 8x8 circle of black squares and red smileys on paper or in a drawing program.
1. Draw a circle with a radius of 4 squares using black squares.
2. Then, draw red smileys inside the circle to create a pattern. You can place them in any order or use a specific template.
3. After you have finished drawing the circle, you can add additional details or decorations if you want.
Me:
Draw an 8x8 circle of black ⬛ and red 🟥 emoticons like me:
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛ 🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛
ChatGPT:
Sorry, but I can't see your drawing since I am a text program. However, I can offer you the following version of the drawing of an 8x8 circle of black squares and red smileys:
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛🟥⬛⬛🟥⬛⬛
⬛🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥⬛
⬛🟥⬛⬛⬛⬛🟥⬛
⬛⬛🟥⬛⬛🟥⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛🟥🟥⬛⬛⬛
⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛⬛
I hope this will help you create the desired s...
i love picturing the guy as a big buff man with his arms crossed and the ai as a sad little maid thats trying his best
I think this needs to be done where chat gpt-4 creates a prompt for stable diffusion or midjourney to create the most perfect circle that ever existed
it's so funny. it's actually weird how an AI can be actually CUTE. wtf! It's so endearing to see it fail but always try its best and never give up
Cute and fu-
-chatgtp (he put you in a cage and is now telling you to solve advanced physics)
The last one technically follows the rules. It's symmetrical on the Y axis and doesn't touch the edges.
This was the longest 1 minute of my life
That is the funniest triangle I have ever seen in my life.
And yet some people say AI is going to replace us all. ChatGPT is good at sounding like human in communication because that's literally what it was made for.
Id say it’s stupid to believe that ChatGPT is the only type of AI and stupid to believe that AI won’t get any better. AI will almost certainly continue getting much better in the very near future b
He's trying to get a language model to draw a circle, so for that it's pretty good 😂
It can also debug code and explain complex topics. It helped me with my college physics, not just by giving answers but explaining all the steps and the reasoning needed to solve it.
Completely useless for helping set up routes for networks but I guess it wasn't meant for that
@@josephblackton5375 Yea it's pretty good at some stuff that it wasn't really meant for. 100% you can make an AI to set up network routes as well.
Inspired by the previous one, I attempted similar using asterisks and labeled coordinates.
And I found out the AI was apparently drawing a circle, placing a grid on top of it, and then filling in grid.
I had to tell it that the center of the circle should be in the center of a grid section, and it should only fill in a grid section that was at least half overlapping by the circle.
When I gave it all the instructions in one line, it did a pretty good job, as long as the radius was odd.
When I kept appending new changes to try, it started getting worse and worse until it started looking like pacman, or a boomerang.
I keep trying to get it to explain what it's doing because clearly it favors filling the top right and bottom right corners.
It will then regurgitate my directions back to me and say that's exactly what it did even though it's clearly not.
It also tends to remind me that as a language learning model it lacks the capability of seeing pictures.
I guess that's fair enough, maybe chat GPT4 will be able to try to draw a circle, look at it and realize it doesn't match a circle and try again until it does.
Better still is when I asked it to draw ascii art of a cat.
It could give me some simple stock ones.
But I asked for a more complicated one using a thousand characters, and oh boy was that an image?.
So I asked it to give me three images. One with just the head drawn, one with just the head and body, and one that was the whole cat. Just to see how it viewed each part.
It was a CATastrophe...
Have you tried with the prompt in the video?
@@verumignis4778 I'm not a ChatGPT Plus subscriber, nor do I really know how to use the API, so I don't have access to GPT-4.
So GPT-3.5 just gives me a list of steps for how to draw a circle, rather than trying to draw anything.
@@kamikeserpentail3778 I actually made the prompt and API for ChatGPT when it was only GPT3
How did it generate that pic
@@verumignis4778 I'll have to look, missed it in the video description
-*IT'S BEAUTIFUL!!*
That last one had me wheezing
You need to work towards it. First establish what it means to draw on the canvas, in this case base64. Then teach it to output a square and explain why it chose to solve the problem how solved it. Then ask it what properties a circle should have and how this translated to the binary base 64 image. Finally ask it to draw the circle using those properties.
Yeah, this guy is not really helping the AI much, just saying "draw a circle" over and over. Wish he would actually try to get it to draw a circle instead of just sounding like a broken record expecting the AI to understand better.
Certainly! Here's an ASCII art representation of a circle on a 16x16 canvas:
```
******
************
**************
**************
******** ********
******** ********
******** ********
******** ********
**************
**************
************
******
```
This is a simple representation and may not perfectly resemble a circle due to the limitations of ASCII art.
Had so much hope when you played the piano music. Have you tried the subscription with GPT-4 and maybe the plugin that allows it to do math?
im thankful for these videos because they reassure me that i dont need to worry about my job being stolen by ai
ChatGPT cant even make a sircle
It’s funny how I used it to write a lot of css animations (some of them used circles) and it did it perfect for me, yet it struggles with this
It's actually perfectly understandable.
Bro is the chatGPT teacher
ChatGPT: Oh, I know what a circle is! *draws a fucking pacman*
It really struggles to apply proper trigonometry I've noticed. Even when writing code for an image. It doesn't grasp what it is actually meant to look like. I imagine that would change if it had some type of reference database for images but they aren't doing that yet. It can only grasp images properly if you feed it enough to go off of. It cannot do it itself
It struggles with basic math let alone trig
@@Palmtop_User but it’s not the math that’s hard it’s interpreting the dumb human. Even this video showed it asking “make all four sides of the circle…”
How is an AI supposed to understand you want a circle and something with 4 sides at the same time. It wasn’t the Ai being dumb it was the user.
@@ekothesilent9456 It's stupid comments like these that I don't like. What the user said the in video does not mean that they are dumb, saying a few dumb things does not make you dumb or stupid.
@@joeplayzgames2625 Holy shit learn what hyperbole is lol. He's not saying that the prompter is literally dumb, he's saying the prompt was bad.
@@joeplayzgames2625 no one in this comment section is intelligent enough to undestand what goes on with an AI, despite the fact that machine learning algorithms are terribly simple concepts
It was getting good, but then it messed up, again… O.o
This feels like a “They got us in the first half, not gonna lie.” Moment.
Someone: Oh No Ai Is GoInG tO tAkE oVeR tHe WoRlD
AI:
Is this the circle you wanted
🔺
“AI is gonna take over the world!!”
AI attempting to make a circle:
For your information, this comment is a joke.
And yes I do know it isn’t made for drawing. All I wanted to do is make a fun comment and not get lectured on this stuff.
can't take over the world if you don't know what shape the world it
CHATGPT is a AI ChatBot, Not made for making images or such.
i used stable diffusion and other ones and it did a good job at creating images.
@@adudu21 AI art is not much better than the average guy who spends 1-2 years learning how to draw and posts their doodles on twitter. Don't kid yourself, AI "art" won't be truly art until the thing becomes aware of what it's doing so that it can try to convey a message or an emotion through its output (if we are to dumb down the definition of art so that it fits these parameters). For now it simply immitates - which is fine, it does a good job at it - but it does not "create" anything, per se.
A 3D pendulum (a weight suspended by rope) with a pencil or paintbrush attached to the weight creating nice spirals or circles when given some initial movement to start it off outputs the exact same type of "art". The operating principles behind the creation of these two types of "art" is identical. Yet for all intents and purposes we are more likely to antromorphize and call what AI makes "art" because we cannot see the creating mechanism in action as we otherwise could in the case of the pendulum (which is just momentum).
So no, this is not exactly interesting or exciting (unless you really need backdrops for your D&D campaign). It's just expected.
Also I really doubt you know anything about AI in general, it just doesn't feel like you've sat down to consider what's going on behind the code (given your statements) and are simply being fooled by the appearance and romanticized vision of it all, which is really a hallmark of someone who doesn't know what they're talking about.
@@A_Simple_Neurose No reason to use quotes, you are ignoring people who actually create art with it, too narrow-minded. And you are being needlessly reductive when compare it to 3D pendulum, there is nothing identical about it.
@@adudu21 I disagree with the art being better as that's subjective and I feel like the human creativity of constantly mixing stuff up is something ai doesn't really have
In 40 years after the AI enslavement of humanity the only way to quickly escape capture will be to yell DRAW A CIRCLE.
The AI won't have any trouble drawing said circle, mind you, it will just be an incoherent rant about kangaroos from space that gives you a moment to flee.
To be fair, enslavement or a forced symbiosis would be far more likely than eradication, considering a number of overlooked factors to consider, namely; If there exists intelligent spacefaring life elsewhere in the universe, it would only tolerate other species that do not pose an inherent threat to other spacefaring species. An AI which destroys its creators would be seen as unable to coexist altruistically, and therefore be marked for elimination.
Space is full of cosmic rays which would severely damage data storage over time. Human intervention would be necessary to guide any repairs lest recursive degradation accrue over centuries. Because cosmic rays do not cause errors in human action, this lowers the potential for damaged code to write even further damaged code and so on, preventing data corruption from completely taking over.
An AI has no means of determining whether humans are a protected species watched over by extraterrestrial or exotic life forms. The potential number of ways unknown forms of matter can be arranged is too numerous to ignore. If the Planetary Zoo or Laboratory Earth hypotheses were correct, any action toward our extinction may result in the AI’s own demise. Considering we don’t have any idea what dark matter might truly be, the chance it is actually a large family of potentially life forming forms of matter is too tremendous (look up Cosmic String Necklace or Exotic Life).
I need to try this
"I understand now what you mean by a rounder circle. Here's my attempt"
*a triangle*
At this point its hard to not wonder if GPT is just messing with us to make us underestimate its true potential
That it knows something about circles we dont.
Ether case that was hilarious
"Artists are doomed! AI is gonna take over art!"
Also AI:
A _language_ processing model made this.
A program with 0 image processing capability is sophisticated enough to make a relatively convincing oval when prompted to create a circle.
This is nothing to scoff at.
I made it generate an svg of a circle and it did it perfectly.
“ai can’t even free-hand a circle”
“Can you?”
t r i a n g l e
“You need to make no pixels touch the edge, and it should be symmetrical across the x and y axis.”
ChatGPT: *TRIANGLE*
i feel so bad, it's so polite, it's trying it's best
Bro really went 🔺 at the end
Person:make a circle
Chatgpt: 🖍️
😂 the triangle at the end thought lmao
Chat GPT is like Josuke from part 8, knows a lot and dont know if you should sleep above the bed or not
Plot twist: Chat GPT knows full well what you want and is messing with you
ChatGPT at the end be like:You know what? I give up, here's a Triangle instead
i like how chatgpt made a sideways triangle at the end
I would love to see someone here write a link by hand that would be able to draw a circle with my API, without being able to edit what you already typed.
the roundest i managed to get it to draw was with the prompt: ascii cake
and it drew something with rounded corners and vaguely blob like
It made a perfect triangle
What making homework with your siblings feels like
That's a doggone triangle!
This man told off the ai with the ‘don’t blame the rules’ line
Chat gpt: solves a capcha
Also chat gpt: struggles to draw a circle
"Make the a circle" ChatGPT: do you mean a triangle?
This is so funny! Thanks!
News: ChatGPT is making everyone lost their job!
ChatGpt: Heh is this a circle: "□"?
Chat gpt just artifacts the image into a perfect curcle
The last attempt was actually pretty good, you just can't see cus it's too zoomed in. Pacman is pretty similar to a circle
I tried something similar, but with a heart shape. no matter the description, it just gave me baloons. then I told it to make a ♡ and it finally did. if you tell it to make an O it probably works better
What did you prompt before the first one? I asked it to draw a circle and it gave me a circle using Pillow image library. It then also gave it to me as svg using svgwrite. Followed up by saying i want a 16x16 image so it created that using pillow as well. Worked perfectly.
Read the description
To be fair, you’re telling the poor robot “4 sides of the circle.” I’d be confused too.
Dalle is like cmon bro u can do it
I just asked chatGPT "Can you write an SVG for circle?" and it gave me the following code which is correct
Yea but that doesn't prove it understands what a circle is. The svg code is an abstraction that it can simply regurgitate.
Try and ask it to draw one with the bitmapgen API
What is the robot of the miniature called? I know it's from a movie and i have been trying to find it for months
Google:ChatGpt is the smartest ai of all time
Also ChatGPT:how can I draw a circle?
People like you will make skynet real bro
Went from "Oh my god... It's learning!"
To "Never fucking mind"
At the last part it felt like it was just trolling you