Top 10 Biggest & Heaviest Bombers of WW2

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @johnforsyth7987
    @johnforsyth7987 3 місяці тому +19

    No Lancaster on the list. The B-24 was the most produced bomber of WWII.

  • @miketeeveedub5779
    @miketeeveedub5779 3 місяці тому +30

    No B-24 Liberators? No Lancasters? But you had 2 Italian no-nothing bombers? Get outta here...

    • @JoshuaHistoryBuff
      @JoshuaHistoryBuff 3 місяці тому +2

      My thoughts exactly. Show the Liberator some respect! It is THE most produced heavy bomber OF ALL TIME!

  • @johnawalker9261
    @johnawalker9261 3 місяці тому +12

    Lancaster.???? Carried the heaviest bomb load in the WWII.

  • @b2tall239
    @b2tall239 3 місяці тому +14

    No Lancaster?
    The bomb loads listed were rarely carried in combat. The listed loads were for short range and optimal conditions. Typical combat loads were usually half (or less) of the maximum load.

  • @mrjockt
    @mrjockt 3 місяці тому +8

    Missed out the Lancaster but included the Lincoln, which didn't enter service until after W.W.II was over, also why list the maximum bomb load the B-17 could carry when fitted with external bomb racks yet only mention the standard bomb load for a Lincoln when it could in fact carry a 22,000lb bomb.

  • @ДанилаДзевялтовский
    @ДанилаДзевялтовский 3 місяці тому +4

    Ну вот опять, а где советский Пе-8(ТБ-7) нормальная бомбовая нагрузка 5 тонн, или допустим Ту-2(в перегрузе 3 тонны бомб)?

  • @jagcop8357
    @jagcop8357 3 місяці тому +7

    How could the Vickers Warwick as a smaller and lighter aircraft like the He177 on 9th place, same with the Sm 82 ??? Avro Lincoln and the B32 are after the war. No B24 Liberator, no Avro Lancaster..., so this video is the greatest bullshit since the 2nd WW. Hope you agreed your own worse job...

    • @chlebowg
      @chlebowg 3 місяці тому

      B-32s were operational in the Pacific over Japan before the end of the war although limited.

  • @rossnolan2883
    @rossnolan2883 3 місяці тому +5

    Love the Lancaster airplane ✈️

  • @palious13
    @palious13 3 місяці тому +3

    No PE-8? Length: 23.2 m (76 ft 1 in)
    Wingspan: 39.13 m (128 ft 5 in)Empty weight: 18,571 kg (40,942 lb) Soviet bomber introduced 1936

  • @laienke7046
    @laienke7046 3 місяці тому +3

    oops! I think your slip is showing. The adds which proceeded this are also questionable.

  • @scottdakadescot4127
    @scottdakadescot4127 3 місяці тому +3

    @The Buzz, this list is very confusing because you're just throwing bombers in that aren't even that heavy or don't have that big of a wingspan.

  • @obvious-troll
    @obvious-troll 3 місяці тому +3

    No Lancaster?
    L video

  • @hardknuckle8143
    @hardknuckle8143 3 місяці тому +2

    better research please - as indicated - where is the Lancaster

  • @ScottTo1967
    @ScottTo1967 3 місяці тому +2

    Didn’t think the Lincoln was even operational inWW2

  • @ronmoore6598
    @ronmoore6598 2 місяці тому +1

    No B-24? How did they miss that one?

  • @bremnersghost948
    @bremnersghost948 3 місяці тому +1

    Good to see the Lincoln get a high ranking, Excellent aircraft that gets overshadowed by the Lancaster.

  • @maringarvanovic8011
    @maringarvanovic8011 22 дні тому

    These are so crap. No B24 and no Lancaster.

  • @d-rob5513
    @d-rob5513 2 місяці тому

    Typical buzz shite 🎉

  • @rapidwaves4645
    @rapidwaves4645 2 місяці тому

    More crap.