Superb vintage 135mm lens!!

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 12 вер 2024
  • Today we are taking a closer look at the Carl Zeiss Jena electric MC Sonnar 135mm f3.5!!! A fantastic lens from former East Germany with excellent sharpness, great colors and amazing build quality. I really enjoyed using this 70's gem and I hope you'll enjoy the latest video. Thank you for watching!
    M42 lens to Sony camera adapter - amzn.to/39e8EWv
    My camera - amzn.to/3DeiF2W
    My video lights - amzn.to/2WoI3ls
    My video monitor - amzn.to/3Dfqfdz
    My microphone - amzn.to/2WhJsud
    My studio lights - amzn.to/3mtS104
    My dry cabinet for storing lenses - amzn.to/2Wjih2a
    Favorite SD card - amzn.to/3sOidn3
    The links above are affiliate links, which means that I get a small percentage if you make a purchase, but it doesn't cost you anything extra. This will help the channel with the costs associated with creating new content. Thank you.
    If you would like to donate to the channel you can do so here: www.paypal.com...
    Thank you for your support!
    Find me on Instagram - / vintage_optiks

КОМЕНТАРІ • 87

  • @andriimartynov83
    @andriimartynov83 Рік тому +4

    Today I became a happy owner of this lens for only £49. I’ve bought it at the Real camera in Manchester, they had 3 copies and could choose the best one. Thank you for inspiring me.
    Now I have 2 135mm lenses.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому +1

      Wow, that’s a great bargain for this fabulous lens! Congrats! Enjoy it and have fun shooting!

  • @TR6Telos
    @TR6Telos 2 роки тому +3

    The MC I have from the 80s makes stunning contrasty colourful images.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      Thats great to hear!! Their lens coatings were truly amazing!

  • @SMlFFY85
    @SMlFFY85 Рік тому +1

    I've had this lens a few months now and not only am I getting more use out of it than I expected, it's quickly becoming one of my favourite lenses. Not bad for under £20.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому

      Wow, you got a great deal for this fabulous vintage lens! Enjoy!

  • @rampager1990
    @rampager1990 2 роки тому +3

    Thanks for the video. I Just picked one up at a car boot sale for £15

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      You are welcome. You got such an amazing bargain! I hope you’ll enjoy it.

  • @sapienproductions
    @sapienproductions 2 місяці тому +1

    They are so cheap but so, so good. It blows my mind that they aren't yet considered a classic alongside the Helios 44 58mm lenses. Do not hesitate, just buy one. Also fairly easy to service as well.

  • @PhotoViking
    @PhotoViking 3 роки тому +6

    I have that lens and I sometimes use it on a GFX 100S and it is amazing even with 102 Mpixels at full sensorsize. That is insane for a eastgerman lens from the 70s.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +1

      Great to hear your appreciation for this amazing lens!! It’s amazing what the designers at Zeiss were able to achieve back in the 70’s! Phenomenal optics that still shine today!

  • @donmacalister9323
    @donmacalister9323 2 роки тому +1

    Thank you for this review. I've just been going through testing a large collection of old lenses and rediscovered this truly excellent lens. It's very useable even at f3.5 but begins to sharpen up very quickly and is impressively sharp at f8 and only really softens a little at f22.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      You are welcome! Great to hear that you were also impressed by this excellent lens! Yes, by f8 it’s absolutely amazing! Enjoy it!

  • @skazhenyj
    @skazhenyj Рік тому +1

    I miss your reviews, I hope there'll be new ones in the near future. I always come back to them when I consider a lens, or buy it (like this one, which I'll soon get). The photos themselves deserve as much attention as the review part. Do you perhaps upload some of them somewhere, like a blog or social media?

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому +2

      Thank you! That's really nice of you to say. Sorry for being absent on UA-cam. I've been preoccupied with my darkroom for a while - shooting film, developing and printing my work. It's been really great! I have an instagram account, but it's mainly about my obsession with old cameras and lenses. I'm at @vintage_optiks
      Cheers!

  • @martinhermann
    @martinhermann 3 роки тому +2

    Thx for this great video!
    I bought this lens today via ebay and am already very excited about the first results!

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +1

      You are welcome! Glad you were able to find one on eBay. Enjoy it! It's an awesome lens!

  • @Tamirkaas
    @Tamirkaas 3 роки тому +1

    Another nice video on an other nice lens! Thanks. I have both copies in my big vintage collection. The older zebra and the MC version. The later one feels much better and smooth in focusing. Image Q is excellent in both where the cooler colours, or realistic colours of the first copy is great, the colours of the second is magic.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      Thank you!! Yes, a great vintage lens for sure! Nice to hear your experience with the older version. I’m sure it has a magic of its own. I need to try it at some point. Take care!

  • @gilgemash
    @gilgemash Рік тому +1

    Thank you for sharing your knowledge. 🧘

  • @michelemarcolin2548
    @michelemarcolin2548 Рік тому +1

    Thanks for the review and congratulations for the simple and essential presentation. The intro killed me: fantastic! Good fantasy!

  • @DominikMarczuk
    @DominikMarczuk 7 місяців тому

    Mine's the zebra version, most likely from 1967, judging by the serial number in the low 8 million range. I bought it used at its average market price but it came in pristine condition, safely stored in its original box. I think this version is only single coated. The images it produces are razor sharp. I absolutely love it.

  • @angelosvass1001
    @angelosvass1001 3 роки тому +1

    Thank you for the video!

  • @ingowalkerling5141
    @ingowalkerling5141 3 роки тому

    Very good insight about this classic lens. I'm collecting and using Canon FD lenses since more than 40 years. First version of the Canon FD 3,5 135mm S.C. was a similiar Sonar-design. The later versions were Ernostar designs. The first version has a shorter build rubber grip than the Ernostar versions.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      Wow, 40 years! You must have an incredible collection of FD lenses! Thank you for the insight on the Canon FD 135mm. Would love to test it in the near future.

  • @SchwarzPoet
    @SchwarzPoet 6 місяців тому

    @VintageOptiks
    This lens, like some others, was made for certain Praktica models, as can be seen from the three slightly protruding brass contacts on the M42 screw thread. Of course, these can also be used on all other cameras with an M42 Mount or adapted accordingly, but these three brass contacts also have a function. These contacts were used to enable TTL metering in certain Praktica models.
    These Praktica models are:
    - Praktica LLC
    - Praktica PLC2
    - Praktica PLC3
    - Praktica VLC
    - Praktica VLC2
    - Praktica VLC3
    - Praktica EE2
    - Praktica EE3
    Just a little more information, in case it wasn't already known. 😉
    Greetings from Northern Germany

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  6 місяців тому

      Thanks for the additional info. Cheers!

  • @osa175red
    @osa175red 3 роки тому

    Excellent video of this great performer. Most of CZJ oldies still deliver! Thanks, Ted :)

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      Thank you! I agree - no matter how old these CZJ lenses are they are continue to deliver fantastic results! Cheers!

  • @RFranks
    @RFranks 2 роки тому +1

    The Pentax 135 3.5 (m series) is a good performer too.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      Great to know! Thank you for sharing. Cheers!

  • @ryanbeer5262
    @ryanbeer5262 3 роки тому +1

    Another great video. I don't have this lens, it's similar to my nikkor q in the way it renders texture. Must be something in the sonar design.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +1

      Thank you! I love the Nikkor Q auto 135mm f3.5! Such a fantastic lens! A review of it coming in the near future.

  • @nikolinkageorgieva2022
    @nikolinkageorgieva2022 3 роки тому

    Very good video !!!👏👍🤗

  • @GrumpyTim
    @GrumpyTim 3 роки тому

    That looks good - I like 135mm, it's quite a nice focal length for detail shots and close ups - not in a macro sense, but flowers and things can look amazing. I think I'd rather have the big focus throw of that lens than the tiny focus throw of a Makinon lens that's in my "to be repaired" pile - it's about 90 degrees from close to infinity - I haven't tried it out yet but I expect that it won't be that nice to use! Great video as always :-)

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +2

      Yeah I love 135mm lenses especially when I travel and want to photograph some wild creatures. The extra reach comes in very handy! And the great thing about this Sonnar is that it has a MFD of only 1m which is awesome for 135mm lens. I also love the long focus throw - it makes for very precise focusing! A great lens all around! Thank you for your comment. Glad you enjoyed the video.

  • @burstongreye7090
    @burstongreye7090 3 роки тому

    Another class review👍🏽👍🏻👍🏿

  • @ivan9066
    @ivan9066 3 роки тому

    I was looking for a 135 sonnar for about a year, recently found one Multi coated , not even used before for ~€40. Hope it lives up to the hype

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      Wow, that is an amazing deal! I hope you’ll enjoy it! It’s a great lens IMHO.

  • @mikepxg6406
    @mikepxg6406 Рік тому

    Great images. I used to have one. But prefer my Takumar 135mm f2.5. and 135mm f3.5 S-M-C's

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому

      Thank you! I totally understand- the Takumars are great lenses.

  • @hippopictures
    @hippopictures 3 роки тому

    Very nice video. Subscribed.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      Thank you! And thank you for subscribing!

  • @Jeff-zc6rr
    @Jeff-zc6rr 7 місяців тому

    where in the world do you live ot get these great nature shots in your reviews?

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  7 місяців тому

      Oh, I travel a lot, which is why I have the opportunity to see and photograph a lot of unique places and creatures.

  • @gitithadani
    @gitithadani 3 роки тому

    I have the older version of this lens and the colors shine

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +1

      Sounds great! I’m sure all versions have something special. I wish I can try them all :)

    • @gitithadani
      @gitithadani 3 роки тому

      @@VintageOptiks The one I have is the exakta export version - both optics & mechanics are v good.

  • @tomsvintageoptix
    @tomsvintageoptix 3 роки тому +1

    Love this lens on my A7R II! This lens has proven that slowish apertures can make up for its amazing sharpness

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому

      I completely agree! This lens has so many great qualities that slightly slower aperture is not an issue at all.

  • @pedroshields9122
    @pedroshields9122 2 роки тому

    great video friend, which lens is better in your consideration, the electric Carl Zeiss MC Sonnar 135mm f3.5 vs Jupiter 37a 135mm f 3.5? Thank you

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      Thank you! Glad you enjoyed the video. I personally prefer the Carl Zeiss MC Sonnar. Cheers!

  • @konstantinospappas6023
    @konstantinospappas6023 Рік тому

    Some of these lenses have written electric, some S, some Sonar and some practicar. Is there any difference in the actual performance and quality of the lens. Thank you for the excellent video.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому +1

      You are welcome. There is no difference in the optical design between the versions you mentioned. The main difference is only in their coatings. The later versions with Electric in the name have the latest coatings which I prefer. Cheers!

    • @michaelbuckley8986
      @michaelbuckley8986 Рік тому

      @@VintageOptiks I have the one that doesn’t have electric but s on the lens.Super vintage lens for sure👍

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому

      @@michaelbuckley8986 Cool!

  • @paolomesseca8679
    @paolomesseca8679 2 роки тому

    Thank you very much for your review: I am in the process to find a clean copy. Many talks are going around about the many versions of this lens, some saying the FOUR DIGIT version MC should be the best. What is your opinion about? I thank you if you are so kind to answer.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      You are welcome! Regarding the different versions - I can't speak of all the versions out there, because I have'n tried them all. But I can highly recommend the version that I reviewed here on the channel. It is the late iteration of this lens with excellent coatings on the elements which give you contrasty images with beautiful colors! I hope this helps and I hope that you'll be happy with this lens once you get to try it. Take care.

    • @paolomesseca8679
      @paolomesseca8679 2 роки тому

      Thanks again: the lens number you reviewed here, following production number published on the net (Nadir Magazine) , should be from production year between 1975 and 1980 . I'll try to find a copy from that period.@@VintageOptiks

    • @paolomesseca8679
      @paolomesseca8679 2 роки тому

      Thanks I guess that my answer has been lost, so I rewrite it here: the number of your copy seems to be following Nadir Magazine, from a year between 1975 and 1980@@VintageOptiks

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      Sounds good!

  • @Nekatho
    @Nekatho 3 роки тому

    when you talk about copies, these copies are original made by ziess or are imitations/falsifications? great video thanks from argentina

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  3 роки тому +3

      Oh, sorry, I’ll be happy to clarify. I use the word “copy” as another way to say “example” or “unit”. These are definitely original lenses made by Zeiss. Glad you enjoyed the video. Thanks so much!

  • @no.7893
    @no.7893 5 місяців тому

    Got one of these the other day attatched to an old Zenit. Have been trying to figure out if the lens hood is meant to be so loose, it slides around constantly and is a bit of a nuisance.

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  5 місяців тому +1

      Hmm, that’s odd. It shouldn’t be doing that. It probably got loose with time.

    • @no.7893
      @no.7893 5 місяців тому

      @@VintageOptiks does yours hold in place by friction?

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  5 місяців тому

      Yeah

    • @no.7893
      @no.7893 5 місяців тому

      @@VintageOptiks Thats weird. the lens is otherwise in really good condition, other than some minor dust inside the elements (nothing out of the ordinary). I wonder if it's broken or something?

  • @robertfeynman3174
    @robertfeynman3174 Рік тому

    Hi meistro! What are your top 3 vintage cheap 135mm lenses, now after all that time?

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  Рік тому

      Hello! My top 3 cheap lenses in that focal length will have to be the Auto Sears 135mm f2.8 (made in Japan version, like the one I reviewed), the Minolta MC Tele Rokkor X PF135mm f2.8, and the Nikkor QD Auto 135mm f3.5. The Sears and the Nikkor are still super cheap, but the Minolta is my favorite from the 3. Cheers!

  • @kainbre
    @kainbre Рік тому

    What do you think guys, this lens or Juptier 9 f2?

  • @samsen3965
    @samsen3965 2 роки тому

    Does this lens have any relation with Carl Zeiss S-Planar 135mm F/5.6 and if anyone knows about that lens, which one is more superior?

    • @VintageOptiks
      @VintageOptiks  2 роки тому

      The only Zeiss S Planar 135mm f5.6 I know of, is the one that was meant to be used with Hasselblad bellows extension. Is that the lens you are acquiring about?

  • @Smooth1productions
    @Smooth1productions Рік тому

    is this lens goos enough for a sony a7iv

  • @georgesmith3022
    @georgesmith3022 3 роки тому

    do you know if this lens is radioactive?