Why We WONT be paying for Warhammer Plus: Warhammer 40k 10th ed

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 55

  • @forsakenparallel
    @forsakenparallel Рік тому +9

    The weirdest part of locking the battle forge to me is that it's literally a shopping cart for the models, and for people who get analysis-paralysis it lets you build and examine everything to your liking, which streamlines the purchase process. Changing this does not make any sense whatsoever.
    AND THEN to lock us out of the Tyranid datasheets? I'm trying to start a 2nd army as nids and now I have to buy the physical codex, which I don't even want, just to see my datasheets? No thanks GW, I could buy at least 1 model kit for the same price. I will just look it up online somewhere less than reputable, sorry.
    To make things worse, for Canadians like myself, you can't even pay to get access. Warhammer + is just not available at all, so we have no way to get access back even if we wanted to pay them for it.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      That’s awful for you guys across the way and a massive over site!
      I don’t mind paying for new rules but when the price tag is as massive as it is for effectively 10-20 pages that I’ll use it’s not for me!
      The angle that it leads to more sales I’d say is a mega over-site and I totally agree with you

  • @diggoryx
    @diggoryx Рік тому +4

    Yeah ive binned the app now and using New Recruit (web based list building, using battlescribe data). If GW had just kept it to the WTV subscription, which included releasing new codex data, I bet 99% of players would have signed up. Codexes would have still sold as collectors items or they could have repurposed them as showcase books for armies, putting more emphasis on lore, pictures of models and maybe bring back written painting guides. Then when it comes to rules they can have the basics but inform readers to go to the app for the most up to date rules.
    I am normally an ardent defender of GW and think most of the whining the community throws at them is exaggerated and made out of ignorance, however this one is just a dumb decision made out of greed.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      Agree with everything you said. We love to remain positive and accept it’s an expensive hobby that ultimately is not something you “need” to do.
      We would’ve 100% shelled out for said app. But will be looking to support elsewhere!

  • @TinyStrokesPainting
    @TinyStrokesPainting Рік тому +6

    This is not the best but loving how you will do what you can to get the information out there!

  • @dittmar104
    @dittmar104 Рік тому +1

    I totally agree. The app is a cost expense not a revenue stream

  • @christopherpumphrey7023
    @christopherpumphrey7023 Рік тому +2

    I’m new to this game and community so I haven’t experienced this frustration yet. I have noticed the supply issue and if they took half of their game to the digital realm then it would help them. I would rather lose dead tree copies and be forced into an application that is up to date than mess around with dataslates and errata.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      It's an amazing game, with an awesome community. Great friends to be made and epic lore. The models and sculpts are fantastic.
      Some things change, that causes a degree of upset. And then, there are a few things that maybe just a bit behind the times.

  • @theleviathan108
    @theleviathan108 Рік тому +4

    If you could get full access through either buying the codices or through Warhammer+, I think I'd be fine with it. I mean, I was probably going to get the codices for my armies anyways, so it's whatever. But needing both? Now I'm probably not even going to buy the codices. I'll just wait until they eventually become available through 3rd party sources.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +2

      I’ve been seeing a lot of people talking about just printing rules as they appear online. We do like to support GW but I find it so wasteful having an expensive book that I throw away 2-3 years after purchase when it becomes obsolete!

    • @theleviathan108
      @theleviathan108 Рік тому +1

      @@narrativecrusades707 Yep, that's it. Look, I love the codices. They don't just have the rules, they also tend to have lore tidbits and cool short stories that are fun to read. I would normally get a Codex for my army partially for those reasons. But, I feel that buying what is essentially the rulebook for an army should give you access to any tools available to build and organize your army. If buying the rulebook for my army doesn't give me access to those tools, then I'm a lot less interested in it, and I'll just not buy the books from official sources. I'll just wait and get them from someone else.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      ​​@@theleviathan108to be 100% fair. When you get the codex, you can access the info through the app.

    • @theleviathan108
      @theleviathan108 Рік тому

      @@narrativecrusades707 That's right, so it's not all bad. But the army builder needs the Warhammer+ subscription. I feel the army builder should be included if you've bought a Codex.

  • @CAMSLAYER13
    @CAMSLAYER13 Рік тому +3

    If they charged £2 a month for all the info they'd make more than selling you your faction codex over the usual edition life span. It also insentivises buy more armys since you have the rules already

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      Yeah exactly, if a smaller charge, he’ll even a fiver per codex then it wouldn’t be so bad!

  • @dustinenns6336
    @dustinenns6336 Рік тому +9

    Such a shame. I'm not interested in throwing my money away on the app.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +3

      It’s such a shame I agree, we like to remain positive but it’s a bit difficult to do so on this one. I purchased every codex last edition I’m not excited to do that again!

  • @chriscurtiss4072
    @chriscurtiss4072 Рік тому +2

    with you 100% on this one

  • @dittmar104
    @dittmar104 Рік тому +2

    I am angry the new codex changes makes the app worse than the ninth edition one. You can’t even check your opponent’s stat line

  • @DPD1
    @DPD1 Рік тому +2

    I do want to clarify you don't have to buy the codecies. I have access to the full Tyrannid rules now.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      That's interesting.
      Are you a warhammrt + sub?
      Have you updated the app?

    • @DPD1
      @DPD1 Рік тому +1

      @narrativecrusades707 I have and I'm wh+ subscribed. I can see all detachment rules and the dataslate changes.
      Do you think it will be free temporarily and will lock some index info later?

    • @PelleGrönlund
      @PelleGrönlund Рік тому +1

      Im a subscriber aswell and its locked content for me. I can build nid list with updated points but the rules are locked away

    • @DPD1
      @DPD1 Рік тому +1

      I've logged in again and the content has locked now. Damn I thought I'd escaped them!

    • @PelleGrönlund
      @PelleGrönlund Рік тому +1

      @@DPD1 sadge, even thi im subscribed i dont agree with the decision to lock content. Could have been the single best wh40k change ever made so i will be making complaints and ratings to hopefully change something further ahead

  • @jamparke
    @jamparke Рік тому +6

    To easy on them. They are worse than ea.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      Perhaps, we don’t want to be one of those channels that just report pure negativity. We aren’t happy with the choice but at least we can help the community out!

    • @johnwhite9461
      @johnwhite9461 Рік тому

      @@narrativecrusades707 but thats just self censoring how you really feel. Speaking truth to power mildly rarely works.I dont know if you guys signed one of their NDA's, if so then yeah your right to be concerned they will cut you off if you annoy them. Lovely company! As for your comments, sticking the app on warhammer + is pure greed, but then so was selling faulty data cards and codexs with less than 3 month shelf life. Inlfuencer channels can say what they like, and make their critiques as mild as they dare, but your disapointment is another, less compromised, gamers disgust. And is the game ACTUALLY any good? Hmmm? A lot of people desperately trying to believe it, not so many really feeling it.

    • @johnwhite9461
      @johnwhite9461 Рік тому +1

      True! Just as greedy as EA: but GW is a lot more (even more?) stupid with it... My sympathy is with the poor staff left trying to flog this lemon, it cant feel great at the moment and I have a feeling its going to feel worse as this edition rolls on.

  • @ubbebjornson3860
    @ubbebjornson3860 Рік тому +1

    You can still make lists for free. You can just only have one active at a time.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      That's true. But as each lost gets a codex, you won't be able to see any of the rules any more.
      The discussion is more about rules transparency than list building problems

    • @ubbebjornson3860
      @ubbebjornson3860 Рік тому

      @@narrativecrusades707 games workshop has returned to its old self. Anything hanous they do never surprises me. 🤙🏼

  • @illhob
    @illhob Рік тому +1

    Buying the rules for 40k was always a roadblock for me and giving them away has lead to me actually spending on models I want to play with rather then a model here and there that I want to paint. Actually felt a bit annoyed after seeing I cant look at the rules for a buch of stuff in the Leviathan box

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      Fair. Just looking now, you can't even download the index cards. I guess the only position they have is the rules are in the box.
      Very backwards thinking. I would love to know the profit on codexs vs how much loss there is from upset people.

  • @Ultr4l0f
    @Ultr4l0f Рік тому +1

    Make it free.
    Link units so you can add things to your shopping cart.
    I know they want to get our money. But I would rather buy minis

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      That’s a a solid idea, I’ve seen a lot of people state they’d rather buy models opposed to a book that will be out of date fairly quickly!

  • @Sciontabier
    @Sciontabier Рік тому +2

    So warhammer+ and all the codexes just so you can see all the rules. Fu*k this. They greed knows no bonds. GW makes one step forward only to run back five.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому +1

      Even if they charged like 1-5 pounds and you only got the rules I’d be happy with that!
      Such a shame really. I don’t think them trying to push wharhammer + is working too well

    • @therustbeltblacksmith
      @therustbeltblacksmith Рік тому

      @@narrativecrusades707 We'll all be paying for the boondoggle that is Warhammer + for decades, regardless of what GW product we buy.

  • @Havic1137
    @Havic1137 Рік тому +2

    I am in full support of refusing to support Warhammer Plus. Given GW's usage of the platform to bully fan creators with overly aggressive fan creation policies, the poor quality of the service and its content, the post-editing of Astartes after acquiring it, and dropping Firstborn marines to make everyone buy Primaris (after saying they wouldn't), I say vote with the wallet where it matters to them.

    • @narrativecrusades707
      @narrativecrusades707  Рік тому

      Hey dude haven’t heard from you in a while!
      I’m gutted to have not seen anything new from astartes since they went under GW. I’ve not seen any of the gw animations personally. Price depending I could see the service being enjoyable but it’s not for me personally.
      End of the day you are quite right if you don’t agree with something don’t support it financially!
      Good to hear from you my man!

    • @Havic1137
      @Havic1137 Рік тому

      @@narrativecrusades707 I have been around, just been doing battle with the unbeatable foe of IRL. My new grad school semester started as well, so its been hectic getting myself settled in to a rhythm of doing class work again.
      Good to see you as well!