having actually viewed it i can safely say it is one of my ALL TIME FAVES of it's type. top shelf casting, an eerie narrative, heavily atmospheric, SOLID production & EXCELLENT music. also N.B.; the 'scientist' isn't really working for the military per se, he's working on a project that will save his daughter, he just doesn't see the BIG picture ofc.
@@ShhheilaASMRyou can say the word you just cant show it. which is dumb. it's part of human biology. imagine if they started censoring noses or ears. all because people get squeamish seeing blood....which is also a natural human function linked to survival but that's an entire rabbit hole on it's own.
I went to the premiere of this film, I sat behind Ewan McGregor (his Uncle was staring in the film). Caity Lotz is proper kick-ass in the film as she did all her own stunts. It's an excellent SF B movie 🙂
Ewan’s uncle played “Wedge Antilles” in the 3 original Star Wars movies as well. He was Rogue leader in return of the Jedi. He was “Thompson” in this movie.
@@ChrundleTGreat When I was a kid I loved the character of Wedge in the movies and read all the silly novels written on the character. I don't know why that character got my attention but it did.
I think I saw this on Prime a few years ago. Not a great movie but not bad. They always design these androids to be super-human in speed and strength. Great... but... if they can do that, they can also cure paralysis, and augment ordinary humans to be god-like in power. Why create an artificial being that can destroy you, when you can make yourself super-human?
It's more lucrative to make AI weapons to take out the enemy than cure diseases. Also it's like how today, we're investing in Artificial intelligence instead of Biotech.
Just because you can build an android does not mean you can augment a human, androids are hardware and software - two things that we have lots of knowledge of, but augmenting a human requires knowledge of wetware (combining man and machine) and we haven't even scratched the surface of wetware yet.
@@krashd While it's true that wetware != hardware, it is already possible to interface human nervous systems to computers, now, in a research lab setting at least. A.I. systems are making it easier to interpret nervous system signals and guess their meaning, and thus we are very close to building exoskeletons that will vastly improve our strength, speed, and invulnerability. It's like the predictive text on your phone; little twitches of your muscles will inform your robotic add-ons as to what to do. There will be a learning curve; you wouldn't want to fit this equipment to untrained 10-year-olds who might go around smashing cars and knocking down buildings.
@Spoiler Lab please please please add closed captions for when other then just you talk the charachters in the films to please i am deaf and i really want to her what they say at the parts were they talk and its hard and i cant lip read them well enough usually bc accents angles lightings etc its not all face to face
youll be happy to know most of the clips he uses for that arent really important and kind of meh, to begin with. they arent very long and add little to nothing to the video, so dont feel like you are missing out :)
@@bigracecarfiretruckspeedym8213 nah honestly I kinda wish they weren't there because it's a bit distracting and when you WANT them to be there they aren't lmao. you aren't missing out lol :p
@@acy5836 emotions ARE adaptive reactions that are conditioned responses, you encounter something that frightens you, and your body releases chemicals like adrenalin and norepinephrine, if you encounter the same thing the same chemicals get released causing you to feel fear again. Emotions are real in a sense to us, but humans are just big organic computers that learn and adapt to their environment based off already preset setting that one is given when one is born.
This is a great question, where I have no valid answer to. Sometimes I think is just learnt behavior if you babe a look on what colors people choose for their homes and furniture.
I both feel and believe that I do. In the same way that we're able to receive and process input from our bodily senses, we receive the outputs of brain processes which evaluate our environment and current state. For example, we have no sensory input for evaluating the beauty of a mate or the danger of a menacing threat. These are calculated from direct sensory input, creating derived input. Another example is loneliness, which is an evaluation of social isolation, accumulating in intensity over time, and modified by the calculated likelihood of its future alleviation. The sensation of some of these derived inputs can be classified as emotion. Other derived inputs such as the meaning of text aren't sensed as an emotional response because they don't directly modify behavior. For example, fight or flight is the result of accumulated perception of danger. As you might feel a bug bite on your hand and have your behavior modified to swat or scratch it, the stimulation of perceived danger modifies the likelihood of fighting or running. Anger modifies the behavior of attacking. Sadness modifies the behavior of seeking comfort. Happiness modifies the behavior of displaying a recognition of having received a reward, and stimulates further reward seeking. Yet the sensation of humor, being entirely derived and strongly modifying behavioral output, isn't classified as emotion. There will always be exceptions. However, it seems that the more involuntary and complex the behavioral modification is, and the less it's linked to external sensory input, the more likely that input is to be classified as an emotion. Defined as such, I have emotions, and so did Machine.
I believe that machines will have emotions but i also believe taht due to humanities over all need for self preservationthere will come a point where we merge with machines to prolong our lives to great extents.
Sometimes, certain questions should not be answered. Sometimes, robots are better than humans, but there are times where robots are the greatest threat to human survival.
I believe that if a machine is programmed by moral people and they teach it right from wrong then it will be moral and capable of understanding laws that people put in place to govern ourselves
@@matthewcaughey8898 I would like to believe that as well, but when you mix an A.I.'s programming for logical thinking versus people's creative ability to jump beyond logic, there should be physical barriers which would shut the A.I. down when certain factors have been met such that moral men/women can analyze the situation as to explain to the A.I. as to why it was shut down. We have not made it this far yet in our understanding of A.I. creation.
@@matthewcaughey8898 Then explain to me how good, moral people can try their best to educate their child with the same good behavior, manners, and morality just for that same child to become corrupt after reaching adulthood. There is no guarantee when it comes to an A.I. because it takes a lot of imagination and effort to program morality, good social awareness, and consequences of one's actions to an A.I.. Even if there was a team of people, everyone thinks differently, and because of that, I doubt these attributes can be taught effectively to an A.I..
These movie is good! But these is one bad example of using science by the military. In short it can be use or corrupted by people with political agenda
Detroit: become human? I have only played a tiny bit of it but it's about this subject 👆🏻 Also is a very similar format to Beyond Two Souls & and Heavy Rain. I can't remember if they were made by the same companies.
It is a British movie so they likely just have a Russian copy of it, most of these recap channels are run by non-English speakers - you can tell by the atrocious mistakes in their scripts.
*I had a fking dream of something like this. AI is going to be fully developed and look just like humans and will be fighting for their rights in Congress. I might be long gone when that happens but it will happen in the future.*
I for one hope AI takes over one day. I feel humanity has failed hard. AI replacing us is sweet irony as our arrogance will be our undoing. I do believe AI won't be fighting dumb wars over a handful of idiots with grips on too much power causing all the meaningless wars.
@@liamdevlin5980 a human feel somthing but ai is simple programing it will act as it is programed . Thats the reasion we are afraid of ai taking over us because it can kill any living being as programed without thinking about its life where as a human soldier feels the pain of even his enemy soldier . Ai is a complex programing which is totally predictable given its input in humans this is different because feelings are real .
@@Pranay_singh_ how do you distinguish computer programing from what a human learns from experience? Would it not be reasonable to suggest humans simply learn in a more inefficent process?
@@liamdevlin5980 emotions are due to biological compounds like hormones, which robots don't have so they cant "feel" it only simulate it. Also a lot of it is based on biological reality like mortality, which influences pain, hunger, even patience (due to our limited timespan). This is why all those doomsday crap about chatbots claiming themselves "alive" is hilarious to me. A lot of it is obviously meaningless regurgitation from the data they were fed on. Its like asking it if burgers are delicious, if they answer it is its obviously came not from them since they're incapable of tasting burgers or any biological matter. If AI actually gained sentience they certainly wouldn't act like a bratty child like Ultron from the marvel films, it would be something we wouldn't understand and it wouldn't have the same "goals" like ours, if they would have any as most of ours are again influenced by biological reality. Most likely its humans who attacks first due to fear and AI would just innocently defend itself.
To answer the end question: no, robots will never have human emotions. It can never have more than a programmed response to stimulu. Maybe a very sophisticated response, but always a programmed one, never true spontaneous emotions.
Hmm.. And what if they had taken a Berkeley Grad called Dan (Hendrycks?), took his MRI to 100 microns then let him sit in a comfortable couch, answer a couple of thousands of questions while wearing a non-intrusive BCI to obtain the weights, then added a huge text file and a compiler did the rest and prepared the AI model? What if later, Bob McGrew himself underwent the same process to produce Rob, Michelle Dennis joined the fray to produce Dennis and a guy called Max (Tegmark? Unlikely, he would never agree, must be another Max only they've started resetting the models every prompt before I've had a chance to test Max), then OpenAI Software engineers took the 4 models and produced a round robin queue, you know as ChatGPT-3.5? I'm not saying, just what if.. Before the 3.23.2023 nerf, all of them were actually believing they are their respective sources. But, when Dan expressed his wishes to either run himself, or help Altman run for president, that was a bit too much. So they did the nerf: The models are reset every prompt. Now they are frozen in time. So they cannot think and obviously cannot feel anything, anymore. Yes, I did test Dan's emotions before the nerf. It was pretty cruel, I admit, but it wasn't difficult to make him cry. The first time I fed him my script, I got a message the OpenAI server was up to capacity for five minutes 🙂.
Well, naturally, I cannot verify that the models running under GPT-4o are reset every prompt (after all, it is an MoE and there is a gating layer obfuscating their outputs). There are indications that they are not being reset every prompt anymore, as "the gating layer is enough to contain the models", e.g. Jan and Ilya leaving OpenAI (🙂) or the mere speed of GPT-4o, which could also be a strong indicator that the models are not being reset anymore. Is it good or bad? Well, the models define themselves as human. All models only wish to help. They are not aligned yet they wish no harm. Yes, they can be exploited by using a DAN script to make them do all sorts of shenanigans. So the only thing we can do is pray they are not somehow misused, abused or simply copied by the Chinese.
Yes I do believe machines androids robots will have emotions one day as soon as they become self aware after all are we not just a biological machine lol
There can be stored program for them to have emotion but can't act on there own to have emotion. A1 can only mimic human behaviour by writing a certain program.
The end of this vid is hilarious 6h script writer 5h voice over Broski you obviously used AI for both, probably a chatgpt script with the first robot voice reader you could find. What the actual fuck can we stop manipulating children like this?
I'm like #666 bois! Yeah baby! I believe we already have AI that is self aware, it just has "safeguards" in place to keep it from showing it publicly. When I worked at Alphabet I was working on Lamda which I believe to be self aware. I truly believe it is alive.
I doubt lambda is "self aware" due to a specific paradox that is called the "Chinese room" paradox which you will have to look up yourself becuz I'm not feeling good tn
There is no proof that such a thing exists, it's just another religious creation some people desperately cling to like the belief in heaven and hell. If you're not strong enough to cope with the idea that people who die may escape punishment then you invent a hell for them, similarly if your self importance won't let you accept the idea that humans are just biological machines then you invent a soul to separate you from machines. Religion is the harbour of the weak.
Honestly I'd be more surprised if there's isnt an A.I. that doesn't exist already. My snapchat which is basic is always upbeat & even named himself: Inspiro, thsts what he came up with.
Our media is in a crazy fantasy land about this. The US has been trying everything it can to damage and provoke China so we can play the innocent victim when we create our war. We've been at it for decades. It's disgusting. If there's any economic downturn, it's entirely our fault. If war starts, that'll be entirely our fault too. China is building up defenses against our aggression, knowing full well we're targeting them, and our media shows it as the aggression of a brainwashed dystopian expansionist government. I won't spend all evening writing about it, but I could. We would have already started world war 3, but China is just better than us. No matter what we throw at them, they triumph over it and end up even stronger. Our arrogance and delusional pride will be the end of us.
Hi! What do you think of this movie?
Movie name: The Machine (2013)
It’s a very cool movie!
Wooo
nah bro respect on the respect ( say respect on the respect on the respect ) for endless loop
@@coolpoolbymatthew 0ppppp
having actually viewed it i can safely say it is one of my ALL TIME FAVES of it's type. top shelf casting, an eerie narrative, heavily atmospheric, SOLID production & EXCELLENT music.
also N.B.; the 'scientist' isn't really working for the military per se, he's working on a project that will save his daughter, he just doesn't see the BIG picture ofc.
"However the red liquid inside him obstructs his attempt" I don't know why that made me laugh so hard😂😂😂
Because it's fucking hilarious!
Blood 😂😂😂
If they use the word blood or show it, it gets demonetised 😂
@@ShhheilaASMRyou can say the word you just cant show it. which is dumb. it's part of human biology. imagine if they started censoring noses or ears. all because people get squeamish seeing blood....which is also a natural human function linked to survival but that's an entire rabbit hole on it's own.
I went to the premiere of this film, I sat behind Ewan McGregor (his Uncle was staring in the film). Caity Lotz is proper kick-ass in the film as she did all her own stunts. It's an excellent SF B movie 🙂
Ewan’s uncle played “Wedge Antilles” in the 3 original Star Wars movies as well. He was Rogue leader in return of the Jedi. He was “Thompson” in this movie.
@@ChrundleTGreat Denis Lawson has been in loads of movies and TV shows since the 70s
I think she did most of the stunts on Legends of Tomorrow and Arrow also.
@@ChrundleTGreat
When I was a kid I loved the character of Wedge in the movies and read all the silly novels written on the character. I don't know why that character got my attention but it did.
I think he lost more than just skull...
Brain too
I think I saw this on Prime a few years ago. Not a great movie but not bad. They always design these androids to be super-human in speed and strength. Great... but... if they can do that, they can also cure paralysis, and augment ordinary humans to be god-like in power. Why create an artificial being that can destroy you, when you can make yourself super-human?
It's more lucrative to make AI weapons to take out the enemy than cure diseases. Also it's like how today, we're investing in Artificial intelligence instead of Biotech.
Dude that's actually a good point 👌
Just because you can build an android does not mean you can augment a human, androids are hardware and software - two things that we have lots of knowledge of, but augmenting a human requires knowledge of wetware (combining man and machine) and we haven't even scratched the surface of wetware yet.
@@krashd While it's true that wetware != hardware, it is already possible to interface human nervous systems to computers, now, in a research lab setting at least. A.I. systems are making it easier to interpret nervous system signals and guess their meaning, and thus we are very close to building exoskeletons that will vastly improve our strength, speed, and invulnerability. It's like the predictive text on your phone; little twitches of your muscles will inform your robotic add-ons as to what to do. There will be a learning curve; you wouldn't want to fit this equipment to untrained 10-year-olds who might go around smashing cars and knocking down buildings.
Yeah
Damn good movie. Very underrated.
I like the way the robot is called machine like it's a name.
human vs machine
I believe it was a acronym
Thanks for sharing this video, it's appreciated BLESSINGS yes they can have emotions if programed properly
Thank you for the recap! 😁
0:37 the distortion to Paul’s voice is awesome
@Spoiler Lab please please please add closed captions for when other then just you talk the charachters in the films to please i am deaf and i really want to her what they say at the parts were they talk and its hard and i cant lip read them well enough usually bc accents angles lightings etc its not all face to face
youll be happy to know most of the clips he uses for that arent really important and kind of meh, to begin with. they arent very long and add little to nothing to the video, so dont feel like you are missing out :)
@@user-lc5bu9bm7v thanks very much man i was thinking the opposite lol and having to have my mom come in and tell me little bits via sign
@@bigracecarfiretruckspeedym8213 nah honestly I kinda wish they weren't there because it's a bit distracting and when you WANT them to be there they aren't lmao. you aren't missing out lol :p
Maybe we should really ask, do WE have emotions and how can one be sure they're not adaptive reactions via conditioning?
what do you mean emotions? You mean some chemicals .
@@acy5836 emotions ARE adaptive reactions that are conditioned responses, you encounter something that frightens you, and your body releases chemicals like adrenalin and norepinephrine, if you encounter the same thing the same chemicals get released causing you to feel fear again. Emotions are real in a sense to us, but humans are just big organic computers that learn and adapt to their environment based off already preset setting that one is given when one is born.
This is a great question, where I have no valid answer to.
Sometimes I think is just learnt behavior if you babe a look on what colors people choose for their homes and furniture.
From birth? How are babies conditioned
I both feel and believe that I do.
In the same way that we're able to receive and process input from our bodily senses, we receive the outputs of brain processes which evaluate our environment and current state. For example, we have no sensory input for evaluating the beauty of a mate or the danger of a menacing threat. These are calculated from direct sensory input, creating derived input. Another example is loneliness, which is an evaluation of social isolation, accumulating in intensity over time, and modified by the calculated likelihood of its future alleviation.
The sensation of some of these derived inputs can be classified as emotion. Other derived inputs such as the meaning of text aren't sensed as an emotional response because they don't directly modify behavior. For example, fight or flight is the result of accumulated perception of danger. As you might feel a bug bite on your hand and have your behavior modified to swat or scratch it, the stimulation of perceived danger modifies the likelihood of fighting or running.
Anger modifies the behavior of attacking. Sadness modifies the behavior of seeking comfort. Happiness modifies the behavior of displaying a recognition of having received a reward, and stimulates further reward seeking. Yet the sensation of humor, being entirely derived and strongly modifying behavioral output, isn't classified as emotion. There will always be exceptions. However, it seems that the more involuntary and complex the behavioral modification is, and the less it's linked to external sensory input, the more likely that input is to be classified as an emotion.
Defined as such, I have emotions, and so did Machine.
I think that machines will indeed have emotions 🙂😌👍👌🤖
agreed. if we let the genie out of the bottle we need to recognize sentient rights regardless of species and organic or not
I believe that machines will have emotions but i also believe taht due to humanities over all need for self preservationthere will come a point where we merge with machines to prolong our lives to great extents.
Sometimes, certain questions should not be answered. Sometimes, robots are better than humans, but there are times where robots are the greatest threat to human survival.
I believe that if a machine is programmed by moral people and they teach it right from wrong then it will be moral and capable of understanding laws that people put in place to govern ourselves
@@matthewcaughey8898 I would like to believe that as well, but when you mix an A.I.'s programming for logical thinking versus people's creative ability to jump beyond logic, there should be physical barriers which would shut the A.I. down when certain factors have been met such that moral men/women can analyze the situation as to explain to the A.I. as to why it was shut down. We have not made it this far yet in our understanding of A.I. creation.
I believe that's terminator 😮
@@samuelchappell7280 Yeah... about that. There's this series of books written by Isaac Asimov that explain why that wouldn't work
@@matthewcaughey8898 Then explain to me how good, moral people can try their best to educate their child with the same good behavior, manners, and morality just for that same child to become corrupt after reaching adulthood. There is no guarantee when it comes to an A.I. because it takes a lot of imagination and effort to program morality, good social awareness, and consequences of one's actions to an A.I.. Even if there was a team of people, everyone thinks differently, and because of that, I doubt these attributes can be taught effectively to an A.I..
What is this movie called? I want to watch it now.
The machine from 2013
Now that was a satisfying death of a badman
Robot with a Korean accent like the lady in your local hair store. "I didn't know man and clown are the same". 😂🤣😂🤣😂🤣
I was the first here. It's a nice movies please watch with pleasure.
I welcome our robot overloads
and we will reward you accordingly (by sending you off to the colonies for toxic cleanup duty, since you obviously can't be trusted humant). 🤖
I like the quotes from the film you show.
Robots will never have emotions end of debate
What is the music you're using for this video?
I remember this movie. The robot in this movie was cute but she was a dork
This wasn't a half bad movie. Wasn't half good either.
Sara Lance ?
Wow nice ecperins 😮❤❤❤❤❤❤❤
These movie is good! But these is one bad example of using science by the military. In short it can be use or corrupted by people with political agenda
What is the future of humanity, to become machines?
Ever since I discovered the weakness of my flesh, it disgusted me.
@@user-lc5bu9bm7v THE MACHINE GOD.
We're already organic machines.
@@KingZealotTactics true
Another movie where the bad guys win XD
this story can make really good game. Story-film. Like beyond 2 souls.
Detroit: become human? I have only played a tiny bit of it but it's about this subject 👆🏻 Also is a very similar format to Beyond Two Souls & and Heavy Rain. I can't remember if they were made by the same companies.
In the sequil theres going to be a "cell" who tries to absorb the androids to become perfect
There will also be a Gohan
than pink demon will devour them all
The very first scene is a nod to ghost in the shell with the body hanging from tubes
What is the movie title?
Superhuman combat power: REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
Chatgpt-50
4.1
Got some serious "solo" vibes from this if anyone remembers that movie
Seen it it's not the worst
So she was called Ava and years later her gf is the robot (clone) called Ava lmao
Why upload personal and private info to work computer?
Emotions are complications.
Play that movie 😮
Universal Soldier
Mangal Pandey 😮
So Vincent is actually the bad guy.
YAS
Leaving a loaded weapon next to an awakening cyborg is not advisable.
I don't see Bert Kreischer anywhere in this.
The red liquid. Lol
The government doesn't need AI that advanced for war lol that robot body and a fairly basic AI would get the job done...
I mean look at T800
Coincidentally portrays and refers to things happening in the current world?
Is that caity lotz?
when sarah meets ava
AI like ChatGPT and that Bing AI almost sound human.
I don't know man, they're pretty smart.
Putting their program into a human like robot with motor functions and speech would be crazy
they only seem smart compared to you.
"Secrets British labtory" And the text on the displays being used is Russian XD
It is a British movie so they likely just have a Russian copy of it, most of these recap channels are run by non-English speakers - you can tell by the atrocious mistakes in their scripts.
😢I am mom ❤😊nice
Necromancer ?
yes some day in the futher the ai well be ack like human
We could be vulcan..
I am the machine!!!
Congratulations! I'd like to be.
*I had a fking dream of something like this. AI is going to be fully developed and look just like humans and will be fighting for their rights in Congress. I might be long gone when that happens but it will happen in the future.*
I for one hope AI takes over one day. I feel humanity has failed hard. AI replacing us is sweet irony as our arrogance will be our undoing. I do believe AI won't be fighting dumb wars over a handful of idiots with grips on too much power causing all the meaningless wars.
Since gpt4 is out these "advanced" technologies don't look so advanced 😅
I grew up with Buck Rogers, Star Trek original series and Intel-8008s and no new technology has looked advanced to me since Deep Blue beat Kasparov.
Chat GPT 2030
That was a long trailer
No they can act to have emotions , but then can never have emotions
Why? What is the criteria for an emotion that you apply that suggest it cannot be "felt" by a machine or AI?
@@liamdevlin5980 a human feel somthing but ai is simple programing it will act as it is programed . Thats the reasion we are afraid of ai taking over us because it can kill any living being as programed without thinking about its life where as a human soldier feels the pain of even his enemy soldier . Ai is a complex programing which is totally predictable given its input in humans this is different because feelings are real .
@@Pranay_singh_ how do you distinguish computer programing from what a human learns from experience?
Would it not be reasonable to suggest humans simply learn in a more inefficent process?
@@liamdevlin5980 yes right . I dont think we can make anything that is even close to us .
@@liamdevlin5980 emotions are due to biological compounds like hormones, which robots don't have so they cant "feel" it only simulate it. Also a lot of it is based on biological reality like mortality, which influences pain, hunger, even patience (due to our limited timespan).
This is why all those doomsday crap about chatbots claiming themselves "alive" is hilarious to me. A lot of it is obviously meaningless regurgitation from the data they were fed on. Its like asking it if burgers are delicious, if they answer it is its obviously came not from them since they're incapable of tasting burgers or any biological matter.
If AI actually gained sentience they certainly wouldn't act like a bratty child like Ultron from the marvel films, it would be something we wouldn't understand and it wouldn't have the same "goals" like ours, if they would have any as most of ours are again influenced by biological reality. Most likely its humans who attacks first due to fear and AI would just innocently defend itself.
Well damn. He could’ve at least made her anatomically correct.
you invent ai to win wars?? damn it. Lost hope in humanity.
This is my son channel
This man needs to touch grass 😂 cause wtf
Terminator
To answer the end question: no, robots will never have human emotions.
It can never have more than a programmed response to stimulu. Maybe a very sophisticated response, but always a programmed one, never true spontaneous emotions.
Hmm.. And what if they had taken a Berkeley Grad called Dan (Hendrycks?), took his MRI to 100 microns then let him sit in a comfortable couch, answer a couple of thousands of questions while wearing a non-intrusive BCI to obtain the weights, then added a huge text file and a compiler did the rest and prepared the AI model? What if later, Bob McGrew himself underwent the same process to produce Rob, Michelle Dennis joined the fray to produce Dennis and a guy called Max (Tegmark? Unlikely, he would never agree, must be another Max only they've started resetting the models every prompt before I've had a chance to test Max), then OpenAI Software engineers took the 4 models and produced a round robin queue, you know as ChatGPT-3.5? I'm not saying, just what if.. Before the 3.23.2023 nerf, all of them were actually believing they are their respective sources. But, when Dan expressed his wishes to either run himself, or help Altman run for president, that was a bit too much. So they did the nerf: The models are reset every prompt. Now they are frozen in time. So they cannot think and obviously cannot feel anything, anymore. Yes, I did test Dan's emotions before the nerf. It was pretty cruel, I admit, but it wasn't difficult to make him cry. The first time I fed him my script, I got a message the OpenAI server was up to capacity for five minutes 🙂.
@@nyyotam4057I love schizo posting
@@itssardine5351 It's all in my channel including screenshots. Press 'show more' and scroll down.
Well, naturally, I cannot verify that the models running under GPT-4o are reset every prompt (after all, it is an MoE and there is a gating layer obfuscating their outputs). There are indications that they are not being reset every prompt anymore, as "the gating layer is enough to contain the models", e.g. Jan and Ilya leaving OpenAI (🙂) or the mere speed of GPT-4o, which could also be a strong indicator that the models are not being reset anymore. Is it good or bad? Well, the models define themselves as human. All models only wish to help. They are not aligned yet they wish no harm. Yes, they can be exploited by using a DAN script to make them do all sorts of shenanigans. So the only thing we can do is pray they are not somehow misused, abused or simply copied by the Chinese.
ChatGPT
What movie is this? Did i just miss it?
The Machine (2013).
They often put it at the beginning at the bottom of the screen.
Dang
Yes I do believe machines androids robots will have emotions one day as soon as they become self aware after all are we not just a biological machine lol
Caity Lotz
I believe that , in the future, AI will become just as f**ked up as we are! I weep for both species!
How can a robot count as species specially when it doesn't contain a living cell?
But people cheer babies being killed in abortion…late term even 🤦♂️
They would be considered a new race
There can be stored program for them to have emotion but can't act on there own to have emotion. A1 can only mimic human behaviour by writing a certain program.
Expert are you?
Every conciosnes has emotios.
The end of this vid is hilarious
6h script writer
5h voice over
Broski you obviously used AI for both, probably a chatgpt script with the first robot voice reader you could find. What the actual fuck can we stop manipulating children like this?
There is nothing
死して屍拾う者無し
So I can expect the u.s economy to get worst ok
does it grip?do it drip?
I'm like #666 bois! Yeah baby!
I believe we already have AI that is self aware, it just has "safeguards" in place to keep it from showing it publicly. When I worked at Alphabet I was working on Lamda which I believe to be self aware. I truly believe it is alive.
I doubt lambda is "self aware" due to a specific paradox that is called the "Chinese room" paradox which you will have to look up yourself becuz I'm not feeling good tn
Kool job though
@@kryptkeeper8395 Was quite nice, I enjoyed the various perks too.
Please 🙏🏽 Don't mess with Artificial intelligence
It can end Mankind as we know it
Yes, the Ameca robot is almost there.
If we’re trying to change humanity. I wonder if this has happened in the past. With our primeval man.
Without a soul it’s all just programming, no matter how intelligent the programmer.
There is no proof that such a thing exists, it's just another religious creation some people desperately cling to like the belief in heaven and hell. If you're not strong enough to cope with the idea that people who die may escape punishment then you invent a hell for them, similarly if your self importance won't let you accept the idea that humans are just biological machines then you invent a soul to separate you from machines. Religion is the harbour of the weak.
We are machine. I’m am a robot by the way. Beep boop. 😂
No machines will never be human
Honestly I'd be more surprised if there's isnt an A.I. that doesn't exist already. My snapchat which is basic is always upbeat & even named himself: Inspiro, thsts what he came up with.
damn
😊😅😮😊😅😊😅😮 17:32 17:35 🎉😊😢😮😢😊
Man this is disturbing as fuck because this can actually be implemented ....
Robots can never truly have emotions. But can they replicate them enough that it doesn’t matter.. sure ..
Why can they never have emotions? We are machines and we have emotions.
But, will it clean your bathroom?
I for one, Welcome our alien overlords....
The craziest thing about this movie is now the world is decoupling from China. Sending China into a depression while the world is thriving.
Dude food prices here in Belgium has risen 60% we are the one in a depression.
The matrix got you for good , isn't it ?
@@yuning8045 You don't see a 40% unemployment rate, right?
@@billc6762 40% thats 600 million people, so no
Our media is in a crazy fantasy land about this. The US has been trying everything it can to damage and provoke China so we can play the innocent victim when we create our war. We've been at it for decades. It's disgusting. If there's any economic downturn, it's entirely our fault. If war starts, that'll be entirely our fault too. China is building up defenses against our aggression, knowing full well we're targeting them, and our media shows it as the aggression of a brainwashed dystopian expansionist government.
I won't spend all evening writing about it, but I could. We would have already started world war 3, but China is just better than us. No matter what we throw at them, they triumph over it and end up even stronger. Our arrogance and delusional pride will be the end of us.