Ranking the Top 10 Offensive Players in NBA History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 14 чер 2024
  • A breakdown on what I believe the most valuable offensive traits are, and a ranking of my top 10 offensive players in NBA history.
    ► Website: www.hoopvenue.com/
    ► Podcast: t.co/vndKggVjGM
    ► Podcast UA-cam: t.co/GSnSCQwEKA
    ► Twitter: / kgsgoat
    ► Instagram: / thehoopvenue​​
    ► Twitch: / hoopvenue
    ► Discord Server: / discord
    ►Film Credit
    www.nba.com/
    / @houseofhighlights
    / maxamillion711
    nbareplay.net/
    / @mj23haf
    ►Music Credit
    / @nocturn2446
  • Спорт

КОМЕНТАРІ • 315

  • @HoopVenue
    @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +19

    Who's in YOUR top 10 offensive players list?

    • @chigaboo9044
      @chigaboo9044 2 роки тому +8

      Rudy Gobert is 1

    • @zsidontknowwhattoname4395
      @zsidontknowwhattoname4395 2 роки тому +7

      1.MJ
      2.Curry
      3.Lebron
      4.Magic
      5.Nash
      6.Kobe
      7.Kevin Durant
      8.Shaq
      9.Bird
      10.Big O

    • @cirlake8202
      @cirlake8202 2 роки тому +4

      1. Lebron (i have lebron at 1 because he has generated the most points in the shortest amount of time)
      2. Mj
      3. Curry
      4. Magic
      5. Kd
      6. Kobe
      7. Harden
      8. Bird
      9. Nash
      10. Cp3

    • @johnrouguine3090
      @johnrouguine3090 2 роки тому +2

      1. MJ
      2. Curry
      3. Magic
      4. Nash
      5. LeBron
      6. Bird
      7. Jokić
      8. Shaq
      9. Kobe
      10. Oscar/KD

    • @johnrouguine3090
      @johnrouguine3090 2 роки тому +1

      Or switch Bron and Nash

  • @thegoodprince3264
    @thegoodprince3264 Рік тому +18

    Steve Nash has said that he wishes he would’ve shot the ball more, because his shooting ability was so high he wishes he would’ve taken advantage of it more. I think a prime Steve Nash in today’s game, who’s told to shoot more and more 3s, would be fun to watch.

    • @jit1709
      @jit1709 11 місяців тому

      honestly he prolly wouldve been what trae is now with slightly less scoring and ball handling ability

    • @pedrogiraldo4367
      @pedrogiraldo4367 8 місяців тому +7

      @@jit1709 Nash is a way better ball handler than Trae, he's just not flashy. He's also a WAY better shooter than trae. Comparing trae with Nash is an insult to basketball.

    • @jit1709
      @jit1709 8 місяців тому

      never said he was a better shooter i said scorer and by ball handling rly i meant like better at creating shots off the dribble

    • @zsomborszigeti6797
      @zsomborszigeti6797 5 місяців тому +1

      It would have been interesting, because in dallas when he was sometimes used as a spot-up shooter it was clear that off-ball movement and off the catch triples weren't at that high of a level so it would be interesting to see how it translates.

    • @zsomborszigeti6797
      @zsomborszigeti6797 5 місяців тому

      ​@@jit1709 Haliburton is much much closer to Nash than Trae is.

  • @yichengshen4802
    @yichengshen4802 2 роки тому +62

    I feel like people underrate how curry creates opportunites for his teammates just because he doesn't get like 10 assists per game. Great Vid HV 👍

    • @tj5180
      @tj5180 2 роки тому +6

      Fr. Best off ball player and gravity in the nba

  • @allistermcginlay6476
    @allistermcginlay6476 Рік тому +8

    Wilt was arguably the greatest scorer of his era and any other he reached 20,000 points in 499 games with an average of over forty points per game, the closest player is MJ with 620 games!
    10. Kevin Durant 10th-fastest player to reach 20,000 career points (737 appearances.)
    9.Shaquille O'Neal ninth-fastest player to reach 20,000 career points (727 apperances.)
    8.LeBron James the eighth-fastest player to reach 20,000 points (726 appearances.)
    7.Jerry West seventh-fastest player to reach the 20,000 mark in the regular season (717 appearances.)
    6.Allen Iverson six fastest player to reach 20,000 career points in (713 games.)
    5.Elgin Baylor fifth-fastest to reach 20,000 career points (711 apperances.)
    4.Kareem fourth-fastest player to reach 20,000 points in the NBA (684 appearances.)
    3.Oscar Robertson third-fastest NBA player to reach 20,000 career points (671 appearances.)
    2.Michael Jordan second fastest nba player to reach 20,000 career points (620 appearances.)
    1.Wilt Chamberlain the fastest nba player to reach 20,000 career points (499 career appearances.)

  • @austinrawlins
    @austinrawlins 2 роки тому +20

    dont agree with everything on this list but you have a great combination of eye tests and analytics in your video

  • @hoopsavant3466
    @hoopsavant3466 2 роки тому +16

    Great video! You definitely value scalability more than I do but the analysis of each player was still spot on. I always find your perspective on the game very interesting. If I had to make any changes I'd probably move Nash and LeBron ahead of Magic but I'm not sure. I also don't know that we've seen Jokic's offensive peak yet, and definitely don't think we've seen Luka's, I wonder how high each of them can reach.

  • @gjslaughter
    @gjslaughter Рік тому +2

    Good list. I enjoyed watching this video.

  • @nafay4702
    @nafay4702 2 роки тому +1

    Great Video!

  • @lukecash3500
    @lukecash3500 2 роки тому +54

    Dude, Wilt in 67-68 doesn't even get an honorable mention? Jesus...

    • @peterpellechia5985
      @peterpellechia5985 Рік тому +7

      Because this guy dont know what he is talking about!!!

    • @beenizz5102
      @beenizz5102 Рік тому +1

      @@peterpellechia5985lmfaooo couldn’t have said it better myself. Can’t take casuals seriously

    • @brickathon7322
      @brickathon7322 11 місяців тому +14

      @@beenizz5102Wilt was a choker in the playoffs and was a even worse free-throw shooter than Shaq. He went from averaging 24.3 PPG and 8.6 APG on (59.5 FG% and 38 FT%) 55.7 TS% to in the playoffs, 23.7 PPG and 6.5 APG on (53.4 FG% and 38 FT%) 51.1 TS%.

    • @beenizz5102
      @beenizz5102 11 місяців тому +5

      @@brickathon7322 Correction, even with diminished scoring but increased rebounds he’s far above any other playoff performer ever.
      His ppg went down and still was high enough to be all time great scoring same with Fg percentage. Even with that and worse free throws he bodies shaq in all other categories by far especially winshares and hof competition at one time. Homie still has more winshares than anyone in his era in postseason even without the luxuries shaq had like allowed to wrist carry and commit offensive fouls and less defense and less hof big men and didn’t have the luxury of his biggest challenge on the boards being the likes of 6’7 power forward Dennis Rodman
      Also his rebounding increased in the postseason From 23-26 but of course that doesn’t fit your narrative so you’d leave that alone lmao

    • @beenizz5102
      @beenizz5102 11 місяців тому +7

      @@brickathon7322 not a choker at all. Only casuals say this
      List of clutch wilt moments and feats just off the top of my head all in the playoffs alone 😭😭😭
      Only player in NBA history to average at least 20 points and 20 rebounds while shooting at least 60% from the field across Game 7s in the playoffs
      Wilt even had two G7 games where he shot at least at 80% (1965 and 1969 vs. Russell) that’s clutch against the goat defender ever
      Wilt Chamberlain G5 1962 first round/ECSF G5- 56 points, 35 rebounds and 12 blocks. Clutch performance in the game leading to blowout
      G7 1962 ECF- 22 points and 22 rebounds on 7-15 shooting.
      he shot 8/9 from the freethrow line and scored 5 points in 35 seconds in the last minute
      Clutch buckets
      G7 1965 ECF vs Boston: 30 points and 32 rebounds with 80% shooting without a healthy Luke Jackson (PF starter, only played for 18 minutes that match, replaced by 6-6 forwards who got fouled out).
      Wilt scored 4 clutch points in the last minute and approximately scored the last 10-12 points of the match
      Clutch buckets
      1967 Triple Double average against Boston, two Quadruple Doubles
      6 blocks in fourth quarter in one of the Finals games that same championship year
      Wilt clutch defense Also turned Thurmond into unreliable scorer 34.3% shooting compared to his 55.2%
      First match vs GSW in Finals: 16 points
      33 rebounds 10 assists 9 blocks.
      Wilt blocked Thurmond's layup/hook shot in the last seconds to sent the game into overtime. Clutch defense
      1971 G7 WCF 25 points after spent the last four matches as low-scoring all time defensive player, won the series with clutch playmaking buckets and defense without injured Baylor and West.
      1972 Wilt scored 10.8 PPG vs Kareem In nba-western conference finals but out rebounded and out defended and out shot blocked Kareem by far and after they beat Kareem and the bucks, then wilt had 19 a game against the Knicks in the finals where he out rebounded and out defended and out shot blocked everyone else by far along with crucial and clutch playmaking as always and in both series, Wilt was showered by praises, despite scoring a lot less than Kareem in his second to last year ever playing.
      Probably best example that Wilt's a reliable performer in playoffs regardless of stats and style of play.
      1972 G6 WCF vs. Bucks- Wilt scored 20 points and grabbed 24 rebounds in 66.7% shooting after spent the last five games as 9 PPG defender. Rallied Lakers to win the game and overcame a 10 point deficit in 4th quarter, and outsprinted Kareem in fastbreaks. Jerry West called it as the greatest ball-busting performance he has ever seen. Clutch defending, rebounding, playmaking, and scoring all down the stretch
      1972 G4 Finals vs Knicks Two clutch blocks in OT played aggressive defense with 5 fouls, shattered myth of him played too carefully when he got 5 fouls.
      1972 G5 vs Knicks. Chamberlain with 24 points, on 10-14 shooting, with 29 rebounds, 4 assists, and 9 blocks. They just so happen to get the Finals MVP right that series and wilt even had a broken hand.
      He won with Jerry West having subpar shooting performance, never shot above 40% in any match vs Knicks.
      Unlike other poor performances listed in this post, West just flat out admitted that he played a terrible series, despite his 8.8 assists average.
      1973 WCS Game 7 vs Chicago Bulls: Wilt get 21pts and 28rbs. He also blocked a shot with 30 seconds left and threw a full court pass to Goodrich to win the game

  • @thebigdipperarchive1007
    @thebigdipperarchive1007 2 роки тому +8

    Thru Chamberlain's "scoring" seasons, 1959-60 thru 1965-66, Wilt averaged 32.8 ppg, 26.4 rpg, 3.2 APG, and on a .50.5 FG%, in league's that averaged .42.6 shooting in that span...or WAY over the league average.
    And, keep in mind that Wilt's roster was so horrible in his 62-63 season, that his team failed to make the playoffs...in a year in which he averaged 44.8 ppg on .52.8 shooting.
    Thru Wilt's absolute prime, 1959-60 to 1966-67, when Chamberlain led the Sixers to a 68-13 record, and a world title.
    30.4 ppg, 27.0 rpg, 4.5 APG, .51.5 FG% (in league's that shot .42.8 in that span)
    Thru Wilt's 11th season, and in the year in which he was injured...
    25.8 ppg, 25.6 rpg, 4.4 APG, .52.4 FG% ( in league's that shot .43.3 over that span.)
    Think about that...in Wilt's first 11 seasons, covering 10 post-seasons, he averaged a 26-26-4 .52.0 (in league's that shot .43.0)

    • @ledgnr197gaming5
      @ledgnr197gaming5 2 роки тому +4

      You need to read Thinking Basketball by Ben Taylor. A lot of the reason why Wilt’s team weren’t that good for a while despite his crazy scoring is because he was a black hole who never created for teammates

    • @thebigdipperarchive1007
      @thebigdipperarchive1007 2 роки тому +2

      @@ledgnr197gaming5 I really like Taylor's work in general, but I think his Wilt write-ups are really intentionally misleading.
      For example, one of his main points is the idea that Wilt’s offences got worse the more he shot, but he just doesn’t mention that the Warriors’ offensive rating relative to the league was 100% positively correlated with him taking more shots during his six years there.
      He can be “Mr. context”, but when talking about how Wilt shooting less made the Sixers better offensively in 67, he fails to mention that Wilt shot 16% better than anyone else in the league from the field (crazy outlier season.
      Or the remarkable internal improvement for what had been a young and mediocre Sixers team when Wilt joined them.
      He claims that the Warriors “weren’t that much worse” when Wilt left, even though they won 4 of their next 33 games after he was traded.
      In the Bill Russell write up, he compares Wilt’s scoring against Russell (would have led the league in scoring in five of his first seven years on that alone) to David Lee and Roy Tarpley (in a 19 game season no less, doesn’t mention this), and these are just some of my gripes.
      One can find legitimate critiques in Wilt’s game without trying to mislead the reader, but in my mind, Taylor chooses not to do this for the most part.

    • @GameChanger-xi4iy
      @GameChanger-xi4iy 8 місяців тому

      @@horrorhilt5882 Why did Wilt's playoff scoring drop so much then? Jordan, Lebron, Shaq and Hakeem all faced far more defensive coverage in the playoffs yet their numbers improved. Wilt just capitalised off weak opponents and weaker defenses.

    • @toddhanley6982
      @toddhanley6982 5 місяців тому +1

      ​@@GameChanger-xi4iyBECAUSE HE INTENTIONALLY STOPPED SCORING in those years to format a new offensive change per his new coach, it was literally spoken about at the time -BEFORE it happened - that's whY the teams were more successful and made the playoffs, it correlated with him beginning to dominate in assists

    • @yukondeighton8075
      @yukondeighton8075 3 місяці тому

      Actually from 60-66 Chamberlain averaged 39.6 points, 24.8 rbs and 3.4 assists on .511 shooting in 543 games.

  • @jackbowden4703
    @jackbowden4703 2 роки тому +1

    great vid bro

  • @sportschannel3637
    @sportschannel3637 8 місяців тому +2

    Great work, man.

  • @Max-kv8uw
    @Max-kv8uw 2 роки тому +4

    Nice video, thoughts on CP3’s offensive peak?

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +9

      Mt. Rushmore of Playmaking and a versatile and efficient scoring game puts him just outside of the top 15 for me. I would’ve loved to see him be more aggressive and more confident offensively, which would probably push him into that next tier for me.

    • @tj5180
      @tj5180 2 роки тому +1

      Elite floor raising as well

  • @akie3042
    @akie3042 2 роки тому +1

    Another elite video by Hoop Venue let’s go

  • @emilccarlsson
    @emilccarlsson Рік тому +5

    Where’s Karl Malone in all of this? I think what he did was pretty offensive..

  • @tj5180
    @tj5180 2 роки тому +4

    U should do a video about top 10 defensive permieter players in the nba

  • @Heart_ken01
    @Heart_ken01 2 роки тому +2

    Is there an easy way to access a ton of basketball film or do you just watch full games on UA-cam? Love the video tho

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +3

      70sFan Patreon is great for classic players, UA-cam is best for 90s and 2000s.

  • @drehitemup9904
    @drehitemup9904 2 роки тому +2

    I would argue efficiency scalability, playmaking ability,and scoring are what determines how good a player is on offense

  • @choward5430
    @choward5430 Рік тому +3

    I've followed the NBA since 1968. I say that to qualify my #1. No one in any league, be it the NBA, ABA, G-League, NCAA div I, II, III, Rucker league, LA Pro-Am league, D.C. Urban Coalition League, Euro League, Turkish League, Russian League, Australian League, Canadian League, Philippines League, Chinese League, Japan League, Dubai League, Wheelchair league, Olympics, Church league, Rec League., NO ONE AVERAGES 50 POINTS, 25 REBOUNDS, AND PLAYS EVERY MINUTE OF EVERY GAME - Wilt Chamberlain!

    • @ryanscaggs1674
      @ryanscaggs1674 Рік тому

      His teams pace was 131 that year lmao, when adjusting the highest scoring seasons of all time greats to 131 Jordan would've averaged 60.71 ppg in 1987, Kobe would've averaged 59.73 ppg in 2006 and Lebron would've averaged 51.77 ppg in 2008. Nobody cares about Wilt averaging 50 ppg against plumbers at an absurdly high pace that allowed him to shoot 40 times a game along with 17 free throws a game.

  • @TrollfaceDarkBruhLmao
    @TrollfaceDarkBruhLmao 4 місяці тому +1

    Players:
    - Dirk Nowitzki
    - Luka Doncic
    - James Harden
    - Jerry West
    - Oscar Robertson
    - Kobe Bryant
    - Nikola Jokic
    - Kevin Durant
    - Larry Bird
    - Shaquille O'Neal
    - Steve Nash
    - Lebron James
    - Magic Johnson
    - Stephen Curry
    - Michael Jordan

  • @mertcan4730
    @mertcan4730 11 місяців тому +7

    Where are wilt and kareem! 😳

    • @toddhanley6982
      @toddhanley6982 5 місяців тому +3

      THANK YOU,That alone makes this list fkciin stupid

    • @AEC2.0
      @AEC2.0 5 місяців тому

      It is crazy I rate the list a 7 tho

  • @coolcorman1091
    @coolcorman1091 2 роки тому +7

    No Kareem was more than a bit suprising and so was Magic at 3 but loved the analysis

    • @GameChanger-xi4iy
      @GameChanger-xi4iy 8 місяців тому

      Weaker passer compared to the big men on this list and he didn't have the off ball movement to match anyone here (he might've been better than shaq tho but shaq relative to his era was better).

    • @Trevdawg48
      @Trevdawg48 6 місяців тому

      @@GameChanger-xi4iy he mastered the most unguardable shot in history (except maybe Wilt's fadeaway bank shot).

  • @ledgnr197gaming5
    @ledgnr197gaming5 2 роки тому +5

    Just curious why Kareem wasn’t on this vid at all. But still a great vid I’ve already watched it twice

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +4

      In my opinion he is a top 3 scorer ever, but a post-centric player without 3 point spacing is just very limited in terms of creation and hurt his overall offensive value.

    • @thegumbojumbo2944
      @thegumbojumbo2944 2 роки тому +1

      @@HoopVenue Curious then, if her were in Shaq's place or in a situation like Hakeem had in the 90's with 5-out spacing how would he rank. He's prob a better scorer and definitely a better passer than Shaq but obviously doesn't have the gravity that Shaq had inside.

  • @paulzollinger6343
    @paulzollinger6343 6 місяців тому +1

    Good job with analysis. Good vid overall. My list would be Wilt, MJ, Cap, Magic, Bird, Curry, Kobe, Shaq, the Logo and Doc. The order after #3 doesn’t matter. But what do I know? Oh I forgot LeBron. 😅

    • @toddhanley6982
      @toddhanley6982 5 місяців тому +2

      Your list actually makes a stunning amount of sense

  • @LongLostTJ
    @LongLostTJ 2 роки тому +1

    New HV video 😍

  • @spaltersar
    @spaltersar 9 місяців тому +2

    No Wilt Chamberlain? You must be joking. Averaging 50 ppg for a season, scoring 100 in a single game, leading the league in assists for a season as a center, rank1 rebounder of all times and averaging 40 ppg for 6 consecutive seasons/515 games (closest is Baylor with 33 games) isn't enough to make your list? What a Nonsense.

  • @franciscotejada1736
    @franciscotejada1736 Рік тому +1

    Is there a reason that you chose to not include longevity in the top 10 offensive video vs the top 10 defense

  • @gsrindictment2547
    @gsrindictment2547 2 роки тому +2

    U used A lot of Advance Stats 4 Steve Nash, but when it comes to D’Antoni I Fear THE BEARD!…

  • @ron88303
    @ron88303 2 місяці тому

    Points generated (scoring + assists) per 36 minutes played:
    Doncic 46.7
    Magic 41.1
    Westbrook 40.7
    Jokic 40.1
    Harden 39.8
    Lebron 39.7
    Curry 39.5
    Stockton 38.7
    Chris Paul 38.4
    MJ 38.2
    I believe that makes ten. Of course, several of the above benefitted greatly from 3pt shot. If you adjust for 3-pt shot, Curry would fall out, replaced by Oscar Robertson. (Adjustment made by taking 3 pt attempts x 2 pt fg percentage x 2). Of course, this list doesn't take into shooting efficiency, so does not represent players with highest fg percentages.

  • @chigaboo9044
    @chigaboo9044 2 роки тому +1

    KGSGOOOAAAAT

  • @jameslearing970
    @jameslearing970 2 роки тому

    How far outside the HMs would prime WB be for you?

  • @bnsz8704
    @bnsz8704 4 місяці тому +1

    Magic, Curry, and MJ are unquestionably the top three.

  • @AveryBlackman
    @AveryBlackman Рік тому +1

    This video is only his top 10, nobody else's. 😁

  • @wmden1
    @wmden1 Рік тому +4

    Wilt Chamberlain's career scoring average is 0.4 points behind only Jordan's, plus he has over 4 assists per game. Not even on the list??? He averaged 40 ppg for his entire first 6 seasons, but was asked, and did, curtail his scoring to concentrate on defense after that.

    • @farhansarkar2394
      @farhansarkar2394 6 місяців тому

      Those high scoring seasons weren't actually Wilt's peaks as an offensive player, it is more so around '67 when Alex Hannum was his coach.
      There are a couple things you need to know about Wilt, one was the pace of his era was the highest in NBA history plus he played over 90% of the game. If one guy is playing 110 possessions, and another is playing closer to 80 it isn't fair to compare their ppg without adjusting for era. Also those scoring seasons he was a massive ball hog, once he started to learn how to pass he became way harder to stop, it's not just about inflating your own value but also being able to make your teammates better. Look at the 2014 spurs, one of the greatest teams of all time destroyed a team that had three top 15 players because they as a team simply played better than the Heat.
      It's not what you do as an individual but also what you do for your team

    • @wmden1
      @wmden1 6 місяців тому

      @@farhansarkar2394 Statistically, they were, by far. He didn't have quite as many assists, but points were much more, and rebounds and blocks were about the same.

    • @farhansarkar2394
      @farhansarkar2394 6 місяців тому

      ​@@wmden1Stats are just a way we use to understand basketball but they are arbitrary and don't describe everything.
      Even if Wilt was statistically inferior that doesn't prove he was better in his early years.

    • @wmden1
      @wmden1 6 місяців тому

      @@farhansarkar2394 You are right, to a degree, but stats are the only objective data that can't really be argued with, whatever the era, or number of championships a player is credited with, etc.. Wilt's were outrageous, for any era and nobody, then, or up to now has come close, on both ends of the court.

    • @farhansarkar2394
      @farhansarkar2394 6 місяців тому

      @@wmden1Fair

  • @AlexHoops
    @AlexHoops 2 роки тому +20

    Good stuff, I like that you don’t devalue modern players because of nostalgia. Jokic is legit going to make a case for best passer in NBA history.
    I know he didn’t make this list but I think Luka has the potential to be the best offensive player imo, give it a few more seasons and it’ll be hard to deny.

    • @biggeneral165
      @biggeneral165 2 роки тому +2

      Bro no he’s not what are y’all watching? He’s not a better passer then lebron or lonzo. Jokic has to pass marc gasol first wtf🤣

    • @AlexHoops
      @AlexHoops 2 роки тому +1

      @@biggeneral165 you’re smoking crack

    • @biggeneral165
      @biggeneral165 2 роки тому +8

      @@AlexHoops y’all are overrating jokic passing bro. He’s probably the best passing center of all time but get real with yourself.

    • @biggeneral165
      @biggeneral165 2 роки тому +1

      @@AlexHoops i just realized you said luka. I need some of what YOU be smoking

    • @daindekruijter3893
      @daindekruijter3893 10 місяців тому +2

      @@biggeneral165you shouldn’t be allowed to talk about basketball

  • @laz0rama
    @laz0rama 9 місяців тому

    I’m curious as to why you include longevity in top 10 defense but top 10 offense?

  • @larrycurtis2783
    @larrycurtis2783 Рік тому +1

    Rick Barry, George Gervin, I loved Connie Hawkins

  • @Salamajama1975
    @Salamajama1975 2 роки тому +12

    What’s the reasoning behind having magic ahead of Lebron?

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +10

      I believe LeBron’s scoring/Playmaking combo adds lots of value, but Magic’s Playmaking is still just so valuable that you could argue Magic is actually floor raising at a very similar level when paired with his efficient scoring game. However next to high-end talent I would prefer Magic’s more scalable traits such as his off-ball game and passing.

    • @benjaminan1183
      @benjaminan1183 2 роки тому +14

      @@HoopVenue Isn't LeBron the better lob finisher, catch and shooter, roller & screener? What else is there in terms of off ball game?

    • @tj5180
      @tj5180 2 роки тому +4

      I would take lebron

    • @Switcheroo1
      @Switcheroo1 11 місяців тому +2

      Lebron is much better scorer, finisher, and 3pt shooter, puts more pressure on the rim, u could argue he’s is even more dangerous in transition, while still being about 90% of what Magic was a a playmaker

    • @ryankayombya7576
      @ryankayombya7576 10 місяців тому

      ​@@Switcheroo1100%

  • @lou4958
    @lou4958 2 роки тому

    How no one from the Era of only 2pt shots not on here 🧐

  • @dravendfr
    @dravendfr Рік тому +5

    Wilt Chamberlain? Kareem Abdul-Jabbar? Hakeem Olajuwon? Julius Erving? Elgin Baylor? Pete Maravich? George Mikan?
    These are just some of the names that I felt could’ve, or absolutely should’ve made this list.

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 9 місяців тому +3

      Mikan and Pete? Pete barely played in the NBA and pre-shot clock players are very hard to compare.
      Edit: Although Wilt and Kareem definitely deserve mentions over Luka

    • @GameChanger-xi4iy
      @GameChanger-xi4iy 8 місяців тому

      You gotta be joking with those last 2 players lol.

  • @bangobuck8722
    @bangobuck8722 2 роки тому +1

    How many of these guys have had 50 points in a finals close out game 🤔

  • @joshmejia5813
    @joshmejia5813 Місяць тому +1

    1. Curry
    2. MJ
    3. LeBron
    4. Magic
    5. Bird
    6. Nash
    7. Jokic
    8. KD
    9. Kobe
    10. Harden

  • @ParamoreFAV3
    @ParamoreFAV3 7 місяців тому

    Nas didn’t rob Kobe for MVP; man was the catalyst of the best offenses in nba history

  • @romeobodeodo
    @romeobodeodo 9 місяців тому +1

    Don't see how you can leave Wilt out of the conversation. 🙄

  • @PJHitterman
    @PJHitterman 12 днів тому

    A.I. before Jerry West everyday of the week.

  • @orchestrator6808
    @orchestrator6808 2 роки тому +2

    Wilt, Chris Paul, and Giannis deserve a mention

  • @243354
    @243354 2 роки тому +7

    KD over Kobe is a joke. 08 kobe crushes him as a ballhandler, passer, and on ball playmaker in addition to having a lower turnover rate and generating more high quality assist. He was also a more resilient scorer.

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 9 місяців тому +2

      Yeah but KD is more scalable due to his efficiency. We saw this when KD put up better numbers with Steph in the finals than Kobe did with Pau in the finals.
      There is a lot of noise with that comparison I must admit, but KDs efficiency frankly makes his more scalable.
      Kobe however is frankly light years ahead with scoring resiliency and high quantity scoring so frankly for me it’s a toss up.

    • @243354
      @243354 9 місяців тому

      @@Dr.J42 lmao pau isn't in the same universe as Steph and 09+10 Kobe was playing with garbage spacing compared to the GOAT level spacing that KD had. Also the 09 magic are one of the best defenses in history whereas those Cavs teams were terrible defensively. KDs entire tenure with GS is a joke

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 9 місяців тому

      @@243354 Yeah I agree wholeheartedly; I just made the case for KDs scalability as opposed to Kobe’s raw scoring. Personally the argument boils down KDs eff and scalable skillset or Kobe’s ability to generate a shot any time.
      Personally I usually pick Kobe(mostly because of nostalgia), but the argument isn’t as clear cut as you make it out to be.
      Also Kobe said KD was the hardest player to guard at one point.

  • @Max-kv8uw
    @Max-kv8uw 2 роки тому +5

    Not sure if you respond on this video's comments anymore, but with 2022 perspective, I would move Jokic into the top 6 with Nash, Jordan, Curry, Magic and Lebron. It's not easy to separate those 6, but they are, in my mind, in a tier above the rest at least. Thoughts?

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +3

      I agree, and I think Jokic would probably land 5th on my list now.

    • @tomaskopolia1031
      @tomaskopolia1031 Рік тому

      Well I can see longevity and some serious records for Jokic. Will it be top 5 of all time, we'll have to wait for that. Now, in 2023 its obvious he is contender for another MVP, having triple double average. But, there is that match up against Embid. Excellent tactics from 76rs. Will that cause others to make improvement in stopping Nikola, or is it just an isolated case, or a, bad day. We will see in playofs.

    • @ZZ-ex8py
      @ZZ-ex8py Рік тому

      @@HoopVenue whats ur top 5 now in 2023

  • @jemirtoussaint3440
    @jemirtoussaint3440 2 роки тому

    So the top 3 eclipse Lebron because of scalability? Cause goat Playmaking and goat overall offensive ability seems kinda hard to beat. But I can see how being able to be plugged in to multiple offenses and not miss a beat is very valuable.

    • @roundtable3501
      @roundtable3501 2 роки тому

      Hoop venue actually has magic and Jordan’s offense better even in a vacuum.
      In a vacuum, he has peak Jordan’s offenses worth 6.50 points, and Magic’s worth 6.25 points.
      While he has peak lebron offense at 6.00. He’s got Steph also at that. But if scalability weren’t factored at all, then nash would pass lebron and steph, as he has peak nash at 6.13.

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 Рік тому

      @@roundtable3501 Makes me wish we could’ve seen a Nash team where he always wasn’t the primary playmaker and shot off ball

  • @bolo5190
    @bolo5190 Рік тому +1

    Hakeem should definitely make this list..

    • @norman1871
      @norman1871 Рік тому +1

      Blackhole as a Playmaker so no

    • @bolo5190
      @bolo5190 Рік тому +1

      @@norman1871 He was not a black hole as a playmaker, Hakeem a lot of times had the hot hand in terms of scoring so he didn't need to pass as much but he could pass and he knew when to pass when necessary.

  • @user-ou5pm6gn9j
    @user-ou5pm6gn9j 2 роки тому +1

    To not even rank Kobe top 5 offensively is wild, just wild. You have to be more specific, because he was invaluable to more consistent offenses than Shaq, Nash, Lebron, and Curry, objectively.

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +3

      This isn’t true, all 4 have consistently led better and better offenses in both the regular season and playoffs.

    • @user-ou5pm6gn9j
      @user-ou5pm6gn9j 2 роки тому +1

      @@HoopVenue Really, because in 2001 and 2002 Kobe, who was younger and the 2nd option still averaged MVP level numbers in both the playoffs and regular season, in the 15-1 run Kobe was arguably more dominant in the west leading up to the finals, averaging 35 for a 4 game sweep of the kings and 33 7 and 7 for a 4 game sweep of the spurs. Steph, ok maybe. Nash hasn't won a ring, he was good for running a good offense but once Kobe got Pau it was over, there was no more Suns dynasty it was clear they just weren't built to win, but they did have to deal with all time great teams such as the lakers, spurs and mavs of the mid to late 2000s. Nash, has no argument. Now Lebron has some argument, but ignoring that much of his all time great statistical seasons came when the league pace was higher resulting in better looking stats. If u actually adjust for pace, in their primes, Kobe averages about 2 more ppg, and only 1 less apg while winning more rings. I mean we can't ignore the fact that the 2020 ring is not as important as the rest of the rings even he got, which aren't as valuable as Kobe's. I mean, I'll go your rout and think of advanced statistics. SRS is used to determine the degree of difficulty for a schedule as well as for championship teams, of the top 10 teams for SRS, score, Kobe is on 3, 2001, 2002, and 2009. Mj, ok yeah sure. Lebron, arguably but his one man passing style hasn't proven to be effective really other than the 2020 ring, because it takes away from team passing, which was slightly offset by rondo, but overall that wad just a weird year for basketball in general.

    • @abhijithashok2564
      @abhijithashok2564 11 місяців тому

      ​@@user-ou5pm6gn9jman u a weird kobrick fan he dead nigga and not better offensivley than lebron steph or mj gtfo rapegod kobrick

  • @DJStevo
    @DJStevo 2 роки тому

    You was arguing with LOW?

  • @andreperesdemedeiros8441
    @andreperesdemedeiros8441 2 роки тому +2

    Wow

  • @lesss4067
    @lesss4067 Рік тому +1

    Kobe being 10th all time is a travesty

  • @dondulla8258
    @dondulla8258 Рік тому +2

    jokic top 5 now

  • @parsleyeugene
    @parsleyeugene 8 місяців тому

    I know this video was made in 2021 and it'd make lots of sense why Jokic is 9th. But by the time he retires he'll probably be the best offensive player we've ever seen.

  • @czxxclzxx3754
    @czxxclzxx3754 10 місяців тому +1

    YOU CAN ARGUE Kd Kyire Kobe MJ Tmac Melo Harden are better scorers but Steph is light-years ahead as a play maker without the ball in his hands, his ability to read and react consistently to generate for himself and his team is just unreal... Therefore the Best Overall offensive player going down the floor is probably Steph Curry... He's Not the best in one on ones(kyire), not the most gifted(kd), not the assassin get a bucket on anyone anytime killer (kobe, Mj), not the most dominant (Shaq, Lebron)
    Despite all this Curry is the best possible offensive weapon you can have esp as ur PG.. Who is a shooting point guard that is capable of dribbling and finishing next to kyire... Not gifted but makes it up for it by being the best shooter ever ... Still a killer still dominant with high IQ

  • @SalRubino82
    @SalRubino82 25 днів тому

    I WOULD LOVE PEOPLES TAKE ON CURRY VS DURANT DOES EVERYONE THINK DURANT IS THE BETTER PLAYER? I think if not for his height he wouldn’t be

  • @wyattfriend7360
    @wyattfriend7360 5 місяців тому

    Curry is my favorite, he is hampered by having Lebron in the same era. He is equal or better than Lebron offensively. He's top 5 all-time in my opinion, because without Lebron, Curry is the best of this era (most talented era)

  • @WatchHoopss
    @WatchHoopss Рік тому +1

    I disagree on Bron so much Magic isn't good off a Scorer or shot creator effecincy Only thing magics better is floor raising offensively And passing Curry is good effecincy wise close to Bron and shot creation better and off ball But Bron is just huge of a better passer With just good of gravity as curry with insane effecincy in paint and his pick and roll Can't rlly get stopped and his versatility is on another level

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 Рік тому

      Steph’s best shot offensive season: 32 pts and 7 assists with 50/40/90 splits
      Brons best: 30 pts and 8 assists with 50/30/76 splits
      This is all with Steph having the most impactful off-ball game of all time.

    • @abhijithashok2564
      @abhijithashok2564 Рік тому

      ​@@Dr.J42 lebron is better than steph you fuckin clown no kd no beating lebron ever again😂😂😂😂

  • @wyattfriend7360
    @wyattfriend7360 5 місяців тому

    Kobe= resilient scoring BEYOND what people think

  • @Daunderdog
    @Daunderdog 2 роки тому

    W video

  • @averysegui5913
    @averysegui5913 2 роки тому +4

    Don't agree with your list! Can't believe Kobe is only in your 10th spot. Like WTF 🤣

    • @roundtable3501
      @roundtable3501 2 роки тому

      Well I don’t agree with your assessment that Kobe should be ranked higher as an offensive player.

    • @abhijithashok2564
      @abhijithashok2564 Рік тому

      Lmaoo kobrick fans mad cry fuckin overrated brick machine rapegod

  • @deepwaterrehab7685
    @deepwaterrehab7685 Рік тому +2

    I feel like Wilt Chamberlain should be mentioned.

    • @morrisparrish76
      @morrisparrish76 11 місяців тому

      That’s about like saying trump should be mentioned in a top 10 dickheads list!

    • @tsu7240
      @tsu7240 11 місяців тому

      He was.

    • @morrisparrish76
      @morrisparrish76 11 місяців тому +1

      Not mentioning WNC on this list is about like not putting the B-52 bomber on the greatest bomber list!

  • @Switcheroo1
    @Switcheroo1 11 місяців тому

    I don’t see an argument for Nash>Harden when In his prime he’s giving you about 30pts & 10 dimes on 60+ TS%, and having seasons where he led the league in scoring and other where he led the league in assists

    • @Abbad1579
      @Abbad1579 10 місяців тому +2

      Almost like box score stats aren’t a good way of judging players

  • @gsrindictment2547
    @gsrindictment2547 2 роки тому +4

    Kobe should B Much Higher than 10 if MJ is 1!…Kobe had More Moves than MJ, had a Better 3 than MJ, Better Ball Handling than MJ, better Movement without the Ball, was Stronger than MJ, shot the Deep Ball Better, and was Better at Making Tough Shots!…

    • @sideshowbobsaget8876
      @sideshowbobsaget8876 2 роки тому

      LMAO

    • @gsrindictment2547
      @gsrindictment2547 2 роки тому +2

      @@sideshowbobsaget8876 Cause it’s ALL True!…

    • @broken78
      @broken78 2 роки тому +4

      @@gsrindictment2547 Oh stop it. Mj still was more efficient from the 3 than kobe was and in kobes best scoring season he took 7 threes and 28 field goals. Mj outscored kobe just by shooting 27 fgs and 0 threes. Mj is also a better playmaker. Kobe is not stronger than Mj, STOP IT.

    • @gsrindictment2547
      @gsrindictment2547 2 роки тому +1

      @@broken78 The Distance of the 3 Ball was Much Closer in MJ's Era, Because he and Others Struggled from Behind the Arc, & Kobe was Still More efficient from 3 in Accordance with the Stat Sheet. Plus Kobe is among the NBA leaders in games with 7 3's or more in a single outing, including the record of 12-18 from 3 b4 Klay Thompson's 14-17. MJ was more efficient from the field because he Mostly Scored on Fast Breaks & Attacking the basket & when he did chose to Shoot the Ball, it was Between 3-10 feet away from the Basket. Kobe Shot from Distance 14-20 feet away from the Basket, Plus MJ was NEVER Triple Teamed & NEVER Played against a Zone Defence cause it was illegal in his Time. Not to Mention Kobe was 220 pounds in his prime while MJ was 208-210 pounds, Kobe was Bigger & Stronger than MJ. And about MJ being the BETTER Playmaker, the Video is about Scoring NOT Passing!...Though Kobe had the More Creative & Flashy Passes!...

    • @broken78
      @broken78 2 роки тому

      @@gsrindictment2547 Bro, you are the most delusional person I have ever seen. Mj was 225 pounds later on in his career. Have you ever, EVER SEEN MJ PLAY? Cause you really have me doubting your basketball knowledge with your statement that most of Mj's points were off fastbreaks and attacking the rim, because that is completely false. Zone defense only meant you can't sag of your defender to play help defense on another player, but you could HARD double team in the 80s and 90s. Whats harder to get out of, a hard double team or a soft one? Thats what I thought. Only around 1 illegal defense play was called during each of Jordans games and it was rarely a call that helped Jordan. And the 3 point like was not shortened by that much, only 2 feet for around 3 years. Before that he shot around 34% from beyond the arc. And why does it matter Mjs shot selection? Id rather be a great post up player from 5-15 feet and score 10% more of my shots then just chuck up shots off clueless fadeaways. And to add to your statement of playmaking/passing, Jordans passes were much more efficient and flashy then Kobes as shown by highlights and box creation.

  • @brainfreeze2211
    @brainfreeze2211 2 роки тому

    can we get a kobe bryant full player analysis please

    • @koolkai4299
      @koolkai4299 2 роки тому

      Sure he is locked in the Hall of Fame.

  • @christophergooding9820
    @christophergooding9820 Рік тому +1

    29:37 doesn't the Bulls' offense in 1994 being so elite somewhat neuter your argument about Jordan's offensive greatness?

    • @haroldisaacreyes262
      @haroldisaacreyes262 Рік тому +1

      In regular season they were -0.2 tbh I think they had that number in the playoffs was because they didn't play a full playoffs trip going to the finals if they played more games that number would plummer

    • @christophergooding9820
      @christophergooding9820 Рік тому

      @@haroldisaacreyes262 to be fair they played a -1 cleveland defense for 3 games and a -8 knicks defense for 7 games

  • @wyattfriend7360
    @wyattfriend7360 5 місяців тому

    Look man Kobe shot 45% FG and 33% 3pt.. That's the new 50% and 36%.. also he shot more 3's than other players. If we apply that to today he would be a monster in today's game. One of the best shot makers ever, before his time.

  • @brianbanks8570
    @brianbanks8570 Рік тому +2

    Wrong on Harden not being a great shot creator playmaker and Kobe not having a great first step!! No. 8 Kobe was explosive in every way (ask Scottie)!!! But he was not a great 3 point shooter… more of a volume shooter…

  • @indianreddy5418
    @indianreddy5418 Рік тому

    would replace steve nash with cp3

  • @mr.getrighhttt3433
    @mr.getrighhttt3433 Рік тому +2

    Having Kobe at 10 disqualifies this entire list.
    Kobe’s offensive impact is what lead him to get 2 back to back rings without another superstar on his team. If that doesn’t deserve too 3, idk what does.
    Curry dropped 30+ a game in 2021, and they didn’t even make the playoffs. You have to start factoring in WINNING when making videos like this.

    • @vernlaw
      @vernlaw Рік тому

      Not a knock on Kobe but while they had a great offense in 2009, their 2010 offense wasn’t all that great they won it on defense as far as not having legit stars you might be correct but they had a lot of talent and that is shown by the fact that they had the highest paid roster in the NBA. The truth is that era was sort of thin, while there were a handful of big stars playing, there wasn’t a lot of depth in the league at that time. And again this is not trying to shit on Kobe. I mean top 10 all time is crazy ranking the fact is he wasn’t as an efficient scorer as some of the higher players on the list. And you could argue that he should go higher but putting him where he did by no means disqualifies anything because most people that analyze hoops would have him around where he is at.

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 Рік тому +1

      88 MJ was one of if not the greatest offensive player of all time.
      Got bounced by the Pistons in the playoffs.

    • @orionrenaissance9222
      @orionrenaissance9222 6 місяців тому

      @@vernlaw not a knock on you or anything but I mean he said peak for all players, and peak offensive kobe in 2006 is definitively not 10. Scored 81 in regulation. Outscored Mavs 62-61 through the 3rd quarter. Averaged the most percentage of his team's points since the modern era. How many players have ever done that

  • @artLopez24
    @artLopez24 Рік тому

    Great vid I just don’t understand putting magic over lebron whatsoever lol magic ain’t close to the scorer lebron is

  • @thebigdipperarchive1007
    @thebigdipperarchive1007 2 роки тому +4

    Harvey Pollack claims that Wilt holds some 90+ NBA records.
    The reality is, he holds virtually hundreds if not thousands Why?
    How about "streak" records?
    Most points scored in one game. 100
    Most points scored in two straight games. 161.
    Most points scored in three straight games. 226.
    Most points scored in four straight games. 293.
    Most points scored in five straight games. 351 (70.1 ppg BTW.)
    You can carry that all the way thru his entire 61-62 season, or 80 straight games. 50.4 ppg.
    Then you can carry that streak thru his first seven straight seasons...combined... 39.6 ppg.
    And you can carry that streak thru his first 11 straight seasons. 34.3 ppg.
    That's 799 games right there.
    FG% efficiency? He holds the record for the most consecutive FGs made, at 35, which covered three straight games. In his '67 season he shot .68.3. Again, he likely holds dozens of "streak" records in that category.
    In the 14 seasons in which Chamberlain played in the NBA, and aside from Wilt, himself, there were a total of five 60+ point games.
    How about Wilt? 32.
    Aside from Wilt, there were a total of four 20-20 seasons, and one of those was a part-time season by Thurmond (51 games.) Jerry Lucas had two, and Bob Pettit had one. Wilt? Ten.
    Career 70+ point games? The entire NBA in its history has five Wilt? six.
    Career 60+ point games? The entire NBA in its history...46 Wilt? 32.

    • @jarlbalgruuf7701
      @jarlbalgruuf7701 7 місяців тому

      Can only imagine what the blocks and steals records would’ve been like for Wilt and Russell. they’d be virtually untouchable

  • @timothyojukwu9718
    @timothyojukwu9718 Рік тому

    Not having Giannis at least in the hm's is disrespectful. I see an argument dor him to be better than everybody other than the top 4.

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 Рік тому

      Great Scorer but not much of a passer or playmaker.

  • @ayurpulle1286
    @ayurpulle1286 2 роки тому +1

    no Kareem?

  • @larrycurtis2783
    @larrycurtis2783 Рік тому

    Nash over Wilt and Baylor? + Mikan & Petit

    • @Dr.J42
      @Dr.J42 Рік тому +1

      Yeah 50/40/90 splits are pretty impressive. Nash was a W

  • @JayDay32
    @JayDay32 6 місяців тому

    I’m not even sure if I would consider Lebron a top 10 scorer. Mainly because he is just a bully ball player, or three shooter. He has no real moves. I’d even place AI above Lebron, because he was able to score at Will on all three levels. Bron is inconsistent at most ranges.

  • @simonmacek9009
    @simonmacek9009 6 місяців тому

    1 point is worth one point 2 points are worth 2 points. 1 Asist is worth at least 2 points.

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  6 місяців тому +2

      If basketball were this simple, then all title teams would just employ 5 passers, why is that not the case?

  • @aimwrld3970
    @aimwrld3970 2 роки тому +1

    Tracy mcgrady be on here boyyyyyy you better put him on here

    • @tj5180
      @tj5180 2 роки тому +2

      Lack of longveity and no playoff success

  • @dreg8679
    @dreg8679 10 місяців тому

    How in hell is Steve Nash on this list but not Wilt?! This list is illegitimate!

  • @dwyanefr4729
    @dwyanefr4729 2 роки тому +3

    Damn imagine if jokic and kobe played together holy shit

  • @goldenglovescoach9437
    @goldenglovescoach9437 Рік тому +1

    Say NO to DRUGS kids !!

  • @andyadams7806
    @andyadams7806 9 місяців тому

    I’m a HUGE Steve Nash fan, but you got him WAY to high when there are other GREATS that could have been in this ranking… just my opinion… he’s top 20 hands down but not #5

  • @coolKid-pm1rm
    @coolKid-pm1rm 2 роки тому

    Where do you think peak Bill Walton would rank on a peak offensive players list?

    • @tj5180
      @tj5180 2 роки тому

      Probably top 10 or top 15 idk

  • @mrbucky226
    @mrbucky226 2 роки тому +3

    no Harden?

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому

      Just missed it for me, I don’t see his floor raising being *THAT* valuable to take out any of KD/Jokic/Kobe but he’s just behind.

    • @mrbucky226
      @mrbucky226 2 роки тому +1

      @@HoopVenue understandable, I just thought he’d be in here considering Nash made the list. Very similar roles in the same system and harden had more success with it.

    • @chigaboo9044
      @chigaboo9044 2 роки тому

      @@mrbucky226 different systems same coach

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +2

      Cole the systems were pretty different, and I would argue Nash was more successful offensively within it.

  • @ekhampton6136
    @ekhampton6136 Рік тому +1

    harden top 10 like him or not

  • @wyattfriend7360
    @wyattfriend7360 5 місяців тому

    The simple fact that we know Kobe would have better offensive numbers in this era should be a factor. You say bad shot selection, but if you drop Kobe in 2020, he would have better shot selection just like the rest of the league. It was a different time when Kobe played.. can you really say he was in efficient if he averaged 55% True shooting in the early 2000's. (playoff career 48% EFG compared to MJ 50%) Is that even bad shot selection in the early 2000's? I don't think so

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  5 місяців тому +1

      All of the efficiency numbers I use are relative to era.
      Kobe being 3-4% ahead of the league’s average during his time is the same as someone being 3-4% ahead of average today, if I were using raw numbers that argument would hold, but I accounted for that.

  • @bornwithgoal
    @bornwithgoal 11 місяців тому

    Carmelo anthony

  • @jonathanthompson7946
    @jonathanthompson7946 Рік тому +4

    Top offensive players ever but leaves off the guy that averaged 50. 🤔

  • @ethannyc4333
    @ethannyc4333 2 роки тому +4

    I would have Bron 1 but Aii Good vid HV

  • @KimWe-a-xler
    @KimWe-a-xler 2 роки тому +7

    Love your videos man, but I just cant stand that you actually dont have Harden in your Top 10. I think, his combination of scoring and playmaking alone, with the load he had on those Rockets teams, makes him Top 5 already. He's literally the engine that drove thos Rockets teams under D'Antoni. You know, the posterboy of Morey Ball. And if we're talkinh about peaks, I dont think there are even 3 guys better than him the way he has played since the 2016-2017 season.
    If you have Nash in there, Harden has to be higher. He's essentially Nash on steroids. D'Antoni basically made a heliocentric offensive system around Harden based off of thos Nash's Suns' blueprints, and took it further by adding the elements of selective isolation and that slavish devotion to efficiency via a ton of 3's and total elimination of mid-range shots. And he numbers show that (see Rockets offensive ratings).
    Harden's scoring is like the basketball equivalent of the Ketogenic diet. Iso-heavy style, emphasis on taking the most efficient shots, and mind-numbimg amount of free throws and 3's.
    I mean, you should put more value on isolation scoring because it is self-generated offense. Being able to create your own shot, especially with how Harden did it in his last 3 years in Houston, should really put a premium on iso ball. Plus with Harden's playmaking ability, that already makes him one of the most valuable and impactful offensive engines in all of basketball.
    It's like having Lamar Jackson as QB but modded with Aaron Rodgers' arm.

    • @rickharrison1737
      @rickharrison1737 2 роки тому +2

      Nah, Nash has spearheaded the best offenses in NBA history (relative to his era) and had excellent efficiency from all over the floor, and he backed it up in the postseason. Most advanced offensive and playmaking metrics also favor Nash.

    • @koolkai4299
      @koolkai4299 2 роки тому

      @@rickharrison1737 That doesn't mean Harden should be left off the Top 10 still.

    • @dewertt7359
      @dewertt7359 Рік тому

      This is the most facts I’ve ever seen

  • @jerome3615
    @jerome3615 2 роки тому +2

    We all know why this video was made lol

    • @HoopVenue
      @HoopVenue  2 роки тому +3

      And why’s that? 😳

  • @mitchellg4834
    @mitchellg4834 2 роки тому

    Lebron over magic, other than that it’s solid

  • @andyadams7806
    @andyadams7806 9 місяців тому

    Gotta take Nash out for wilt man… the man averaged what 50 points a season at one time? Dropped 100 in a game? Amazing rebounder as well and ok passer? Stop…. Nash was a SAVAGE but wilt was more dominant

  • @peterpellechia5985
    @peterpellechia5985 Рік тому

    This list is a crock!!!

  • @joshuamorrison8332
    @joshuamorrison8332 Рік тому

    Enough with the bias against Chamberlain. I understand that many people don't like his personality but that doesn't change the fact that he is objectively #1 on this list

    • @ryanscaggs1674
      @ryanscaggs1674 Рік тому +1

      Lmaooo he's objectively not even top 5

    • @joshuamorrison8332
      @joshuamorrison8332 Рік тому

      @@ryanscaggs1674 I'm not sure you know what the word objectively means. Most points, most rebounds, most blocked shots. Most assists. If you don't consider him top 5 then you must have your reason but there is definitely nothing to lmao about

    • @ryanscaggs1674
      @ryanscaggs1674 Рік тому +1

      @@joshuamorrison8332 he's no where near most points or assists lmao. And I've adjusted his ppg to today's league average pace and he would've only averaged 21.6 ppg through his career, down from the inflated 30 ppg he had because of the absurdly high pace in the 60s

    • @joshuamorrison8332
      @joshuamorrison8332 Рік тому

      @@ryanscaggs1674 We clearly aren't going to agree about this. I think you are making a fool of yourself mocking the accomplishments of Wilt Chamberlain though.

    • @exgeeinteractive
      @exgeeinteractive 6 місяців тому

      @@joshuamorrison8332 Pace matters

  • @terrywags982
    @terrywags982 Рік тому

    He saved the best for last! MJ the best player ever! End of story!

  • @kawhidynastyenderleonard6364
    @kawhidynastyenderleonard6364 2 роки тому

    If you see this comment where do you have curry all time as a playmaker

  • @greekfreakfan
    @greekfreakfan 4 місяці тому

    In my opinion KD is 1