Hi Maarten. Fantastic review, best one I have found for explaining all the modes and features. I've wanted this camera for nearly 4 years and finally bought it the other week, now that I can afford it thanks to its replacement coming out. I too have viewed the review many times as it's as good as having a user guide. many thanks. Chris.
I keep coming back to this review as I find it very informative in my deliberations as to whether to purchase the camera for the long term. I find the review balanced and overall positive in the area that means the most to me: image quality. As an ordinary photographer I just need to take the snap as I see it. If the children are smiling then great! But it's the quality that's important to me, and will be when I look back in the years to come. Once again, thanks Maarten.
+David Nunn Wow, that's so nice of you to say. For image quality, I will caution that I don't do as detailed and technical review as you'll find on dpreview.
I had the first 10 years of shooting with just a 50mm f1.4. I certainly don't miss those days, You can't always get closer to your subject. Air show is a good example.
You should get paid by Sony to do this, very informative and easy to understand. Thanks for taking the time to do a thorough review, i have an A7R and is looking to trade someone for the RX1. Been watching reviews all week and found this great video!
Hi Maarten, I wanted to ask your opinion on whether you think the images from the RX1R are better quality than those from the A7 with 35 F2.8 Zeiss lens. I understand the differences in the two cameras but have never had the opportunity to shoot with the RX1R and compare them to the A7. Since you have shot with both I thought I would ask you if you can see better color, clarity, etc. using the RX1R? I have used the A7 and the A7R and I do like the A7 better but still curious about the RX1R.
To my eye, they are reasonably equivalent. Unless you have some quirky reason to prefer the RX1r, I'd go with the A7. I will qualify that by saying that I'm not a pixel peeper - if that's the level detail you'd like, I'd recommend you check with dxomark or another review site.
You seem to be a Sony guy, and, based on what I've seen from you here and on Vimeo, I'd be interested in your thoughts on a decision I have coming up. Most of my experience is with Nikon, which, as you may know, uses Sony sensors; particularly in the D800E. As I find myself needing more "video" capabilities, I'm facing a challenge in selecting between still that does video, or dedicated video. I was thinking Canon XF100 until I saw your Sony NEX VG30 review. Like what the sensor gives (but maybe I'm a snob about size?), though not so much the experience with tripod mounting. I've also had my eye on the Sony RX1 for a long time and think I'd go for the RX1r, assuming it could at least hold its own for video in terms of my criteria. Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks again for this video, and all your hard work (including the biking stuff).
I have to say, of all the reviews of this camera that I've seen on youtube, yours has been the most informative and in my opinion, most objective. I'm curious if after all these months the novelty has worn off or if you feel the same way as in this review.
Thank you for the kind words - I appreciate the comment. Sadly, after the review I had to return the camera to Sony. And that was last summer - so I re-watched my review to think about your question. I've also reviewed a bunch of cameras since, and I think if I was going to purchase a full frame camera I might prefer the A7 or A7r, which have improved menu systems and interchangeable lenses over the RX1r. Other than that, the technology - sensor, processor and features - is about the same. If you'd like more detail - please watch my A7r review.
***** Thank you for the reference, oddly enough I'm drawn to the RX1R more than the A7R. It seems to remind me more of the past when all I had was an M2 and a 35 Summicron. For some reason I took better pictures then than I do today with all the improvements in technology. I think I would prefer to have to work harder and depend on my ability to use a 35mm lens than go back to changing lenses and carrying large bags. Thanks again.
This my sound silly, but I cannot find in the manual instructions, as to how to retrieve/save in my computer movies taken with the Sony RX1... any useful tips please. Thanks
AVCHD files should not be accessed as files from the card directly (but you'll find them in the "private" folder). Use Sony's image editing app or a video editing application (one that is familiar with AVCHD) and point the File/Open at the disk, or at the folder and it will find, import and "extract" the files properly. Copying the files directly will result in files that don't work or need to be converted. Which editing app are you using?
It is indeed! I bought that camera last week, and some of the functions you explained in your video were definitely NOT well explained in the tiny user manual that comes with the camera. Thanks again for such a nice review! :)
how do you turn off the AF eye feature....To save battery i want to turn this feature off and have focus start when i press the shutter down and lock focus at the half way point and not before......???? second question, WHY would you have the clear image off , how does it effect the image if i have it on shooting at 35mm as compared to having it off? REPLY
The RX1r does not support AF eye - you cannot turn it either on or off. When using the clear image zoom, the image is cropped on the sensor, so the resolution is lower. Sony uses pixel interpolation to "recover" the missing pixels.
***** Thank you for the reply! It seems a great camera, but for me still can't justify to have it alongside my fuji x system... Apple TV? Screensaver function?
Another question...with the clear image on, BUT i do not use the zoom, i take the photo in 35mm, will the clear image being on affect my photo, or will it be just as if i had the clear image turned off, because i took the photo in 35mm and DID NOT use the zoom?
That's correct, unless you zoom, there is no clear image effect. I would recommend that you leave it off and crop your photographs in photoshop or lightroom, that will likely provide better results.
thanks for this excellent review and the effort you spent for this high quality analyze, not wrapped in salesman words. I appreciate that style very much. There is just one big point, that keeps me away from a purchase of the RX1. I am so used to a zoom. What kind of words do you have to convince me in the that point? Up front, thanks a lot for your answer.
Exceptional review Maarten. What's your opinion of the lack of stabilizer? It sounded like the tendency to selecting 1/80 was not ideal. I wonder if the rx2r will include this and at this late stage in its existence it would be better to wait given the price point. Thanks again.
crow4868 Thanks for your kind comment. For stills, it's usually easy to work around the lack of a stabilizer, for video you'd prefer to shoot with a tripod or monopod. And although 1/80 is not ideal, most of us are using the A,S,M modes, so are not really bothered.
Great review Maarten. I have been considering the RX1R m 2. I need a camera for travel and mountaineering. I am not a professional, I just want a point and shoot that will give me the best possible results. You only get that, once in a life time shot of a sunrise from the top of a mountain. It has to be small, and I can't be carrying/changing lenses on the top of a mountain. Is this the camera for my needs, or would you recommend something else. Thank you very much, John from UK.
While I don't want to knock this camera in any way - it's a powerful and capable device with a large sensor. However, (as someone else who's not a professional) I'd take either the RX100 (I, IV or V) and/or the RX10 III or IV. The RX100 series is small enough to fit in nearly any pocket, yet has all the features you'll ever need - I've loved it every time I've shot with one. The RX10 is larger, but has a most amazing lens, with a 600mm reach, which might be very useful. You'll find reviews on my channel of both. Hope this helps.
i take issue, you absolutely need the optional EVF viewfinder, no way can you see what you are shooting when the sun is bright and on the monitor.......other wise, great job....thanks....
The newer camera, if this style, size and configuration appeals, is the RX1Rm2. Unless you have a desperate need to be at the front of the tech curve, I think, for style, size and configuration, it's still a very good choice.
I like this cameras image quality but the fixed focal length lens is a deal breaker for me. I think after having good quality zoom lenses going to a fixed focal length lens is more nostalgic than practicable
I HAVE THE CAMERA RX1R, THE 2 AS THE SAME LENSE, HOWEVER, ONCE YOU USE THE ZOOM THIS LENS LOSES IT'S ADVANTAGE.......I HAD IT REPAIRED TWICE, BOTH TIMES THE LENS LOST IT'S ABILITY TO FOCUS AND TWICE THE TURN AROUND TIME WAS MORE THAN 3 MONTHS BECAUSE SONY USES OUT SIDE SERVICE AND THEY DO NOT MAINTAIN ANY INVENTORY........I PURCHASED THE VIEW FINDER TWICE BECAUSE I LOST IT ONCE, THE SECOND ONE I FASTENED ON WITH TAPE, IT IS NOW VERY SECURE AND I CAN EASILY REMOVE IT......I PURCHASED THE OPTIONAL VIEWFINDER BECAUSE ON A SUNNY DAY IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE YOUR SUBJECT WITH THE LED SCREEN....AS FAR AS USING THE MACRO LENS SETTING, FORGET IT, I LEAVE THE LENS ON IT'S DEFAULT SETTING.....I HAVE MISSED SHOTS DO TO IT'S SLOW AUTO FOCUSING SYSTEM, I HAVE ALSO EXPERIENCED THE CAMERA NOT BEING ABLE TO FOCUS PROPERLY WITH NO FAULT OF MINE, THIS COULD BE A PROBLEM BUILT INTO THE SYSTEM BECAUSE IT HAS HAPPENED MORE THAN SEVERAL TIMES.....I ALSO HOOKED UP THE LENS CAP SO I WOULD NOT LOSE IT, IT NOW HANGS SECURELY FROM THE CAMERA BODY......I CARRY EIGHT BATTERIES BECAUSE OF THEIR SHORT LIFE, THEY ARE VERY SMALL AND DO NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM TO CARRY.......YES, IT IS A GREA CAMERA IN THE 35MM MODE, THE EHTIRE SET UP COST ME 2,800.00 FOR THE CAMERA AND ANOTHER 500.00 FOR THE VIEW FINDER WHICH IS A MUST HAVE........BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THIS OUTFIT IS TOTALLY PRICED BEYOND COMMON SENSE, I MUST HAVE BEEN UNDER THE INFLUENCE, I MADE THIS PURCHASE BECAUSE I COULD HAVE PURCHASED A STATE OF THE ART 35MM LENS AND PLACED IT ON MY A99 OR A99/2 AND SAVED THOUSANDS AND STILL GOT TERRIFIC IMAGES.........WOULD I PURCHASE THE RX1R2, ABSOLUTELY NOT, I WENT TO TRADE IN THIS MODEL WHICH IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION AND I WAS OFFERED UNDER 800.00 FOR THE CAMERA AND VIEWFINDER WITH EVERYTHING IT ORIGINALLY CAME WITH, SO I GUESS I WILL DIE WITH IT, THATS 25% OF MY ORIGINAL COST, YET I SEE IT BEING SOLD BY THE PEOPLE WHO SOLD IT TO ME NOW USED FOR JUST UNDER 2,000.00 DOLLARS.....HMMMMMM!.....LOOKS LIKE A GOOD BUSINESS TO BE IN.......
In the past 2 years, twice in for repair and parts are hard to come by, both times the camera was in the repair shop more then 2 months waiting for parts, plus Sony farms it's repairs out to a third party....Once you leave the 35mm mode your image quality drops.....Camera is slow to lock focus....Much to expensive just to be used as a 35mm lens camera,, because of this i made mistake purchasing it....My repair problems could be just do to the fact i have a lemon...Either way i can not recommend this camera....
Well overpraised.The price should be no more 500 dollars. Micro 43 is much better option if you want small size camera and interchangeable lenses and very good quality.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect a high quality camera with a full frame sensor to be sold at that price. If micro four thirds suits your needs, then I'm glad to hear it satisfies you.
Another great video which I have enjoyed very much. The Sony RX1, RX1R and RX1R Mark II are a great series of cameras. But the price is expensive. Here in the UK, the Nikon D750 plus 24-120mm F4 lens combination is much cheaper than the RX1. As for the RX1R Mark II, well this is even more expensive. Having said all of this, if I were to win the lottery, the RX1R Mark II is on my "Cameras to Buy" list along with the Leica Q and Leica SL (plus multiple lenses).
I really like your clear, no-nonsense style of reviewing - not to mention the high production quality of your video.
I really like your thoughtful analysis of my video! Thanks for the kind words. :-)
Hi Maarten. Fantastic review, best one I have found for explaining all the modes and features. I've wanted this camera for nearly 4 years and finally bought it the other week, now that I can afford it thanks to its replacement coming out. I too have viewed the review many times as it's as good as having a user guide. many thanks. Chris.
I appreciate the kind words, thanks for commenting - it's always nice to know my videos have been helpful.
Thanks for your exzellent review of this beautiful Camera. Got my RX1 a year ago and still love it. Greetings from Germany.
Excellent video Maarten. Thanks for taking the time to make it.
+George Coote My pleasure, I enjoy trying out cameras and making videos. Thanks for the kind words.
I keep coming back to this review as I find it very informative in my deliberations as to whether to purchase the camera for the long term. I find the review balanced and overall positive in the area that means the most to me: image quality. As an ordinary photographer I just need to take the snap as I see it. If the children are smiling then great! But it's the quality that's important to me, and will be when I look back in the years to come.
Once again, thanks Maarten.
+David Nunn Wow, that's so nice of you to say. For image quality, I will caution that I don't do as detailed and technical review as you'll find on dpreview.
Thanks for your kind words.
Thanks for all your work making this video, it's easier to understand and makes much more sense than the official manual.
+RollaArtis That's very kind of you to say, thanks!
thanks for the kind words ... I appreciate your support. Please "like" and "subscribe".
Thank you for your kind words. I'll think about doing a video about bowel movements.
I had the first 10 years of shooting with just a 50mm f1.4. I certainly don't miss those days, You can't always get closer to your subject. Air show is a good example.
You should get paid by Sony to do this, very informative and easy to understand. Thanks for taking the time to do a thorough review, i have an A7R and is looking to trade someone for the RX1. Been watching reviews all week and found this great video!
+Vince Phan Thanks for the kind words, I appreciate the compliment. But if I was paid by Sony, I might not feel so forthright in my comments.
very well-thought out evaluation, thanks
Moh Azima Those are kind words, thanks.
The best review I've ever seen!
Thanks for the kind words - I appreciate your support.
Fantastic review of what looks like a great camera!
Hi Maarten,
I wanted to ask your opinion on whether you think the images from the RX1R are better quality than those from the A7 with 35 F2.8 Zeiss lens. I understand the differences in the two cameras but have never had the opportunity to shoot with the RX1R and compare them to the A7. Since you have shot with both I thought I would ask you if you can see better color, clarity, etc. using the RX1R? I have used the A7 and the A7R and I do like the A7 better but still curious about the RX1R.
To my eye, they are reasonably equivalent. Unless you have some quirky reason to prefer the RX1r, I'd go with the A7. I will qualify that by saying that I'm not a pixel peeper - if that's the level detail you'd like, I'd recommend you check with dxomark or another review site.
You seem to be a Sony guy, and, based on what I've seen from you here and on Vimeo, I'd be interested in your thoughts on a decision I have coming up.
Most of my experience is with Nikon, which, as you may know, uses Sony sensors; particularly in the D800E. As I find myself needing more "video" capabilities, I'm facing a challenge in selecting between still that does video, or dedicated video. I was thinking Canon XF100 until I saw your Sony NEX VG30 review. Like what the sensor gives (but maybe I'm a snob about size?), though not so much the experience with tripod mounting. I've also had my eye on the Sony RX1 for a long time and think I'd go for the RX1r, assuming it could at least hold its own for video in terms of my criteria.
Any feedback would be appreciated. Thanks again for this video, and all your hard work (including the biking stuff).
Very informative, and nicely produced
I have to say, of all the reviews of this camera that I've seen on youtube, yours has been the most informative and in my opinion, most objective. I'm curious if after all these months the novelty has worn off or if you feel the same way as in this review.
Thank you for the kind words - I appreciate the comment. Sadly, after the review I had to return the camera to Sony. And that was last summer - so I re-watched my review to think about your question. I've also reviewed a bunch of cameras since, and I think if I was going to purchase a full frame camera I might prefer the A7 or A7r, which have improved menu systems and interchangeable lenses over the RX1r. Other than that, the technology - sensor, processor and features - is about the same. If you'd like more detail - please watch my A7r review.
***** Thank you for the reference, oddly enough I'm drawn to the RX1R more than the A7R. It seems to remind me more of the past when all I had was an M2 and a 35 Summicron. For some reason I took better pictures then than I do today with all the improvements in technology. I think I would prefer to have to work harder and depend on my ability to use a 35mm lens than go back to changing lenses and carrying large bags. Thanks again.
Very good review, I really appreciate it!
Likewise, I appreciate your kind words. thanks for watching.
This my sound silly, but I cannot find in the manual instructions, as to how to retrieve/save in my computer movies taken with the Sony RX1... any useful tips please. Thanks
AVCHD files should not be accessed as files from the card directly (but you'll find them in the "private" folder). Use Sony's image editing app or a video editing application (one that is familiar with AVCHD) and point the File/Open at the disk, or at the folder and it will find, import and "extract" the files properly. Copying the files directly will result in files that don't work or need to be converted. Which editing app are you using?
Love review....considering getting refurbished one
zcarenow Thanks for the kind words - sounds like a plan.
Good sensible review. Thanks. Considering this RX1R versus the A7 with the 35 f2.8. Quite torn...
Excellent review! Thanks!
Very kind of you to say, thanks for commenting.
It is indeed! I bought that camera last week, and some of the functions you explained in your video were definitely NOT well explained in the tiny user manual that comes with the camera. Thanks again for such a nice review! :)
It's a pleasure to read those kinds of comments - always happy to hear that I've uncovered features for my viewers.
Question, i looked in the menu for EYE FOCUS in this camera and could not find it, does it have this feature?....thanks
Nope, but they did used to hide it in custom settings for specific buttons.
how do you turn off the AF eye feature....To save battery i want to turn this feature off and have focus start when i press the shutter down and lock focus at the half way point and not before......???? second question, WHY would you have the clear image off , how does it effect the image if i have it on shooting at 35mm as compared to having it off?
REPLY
The RX1r does not support AF eye - you cannot turn it either on or off. When using the clear image zoom, the image is cropped on the sensor, so the resolution is lower. Sony uses pixel interpolation to "recover" the missing pixels.
Great review! Compared with RX1, only difference on this one is no low pass filter? BTW, how did you generate the nice photo video galleries?
Peng Bai Thanks. That's my understanding, I didn't have a RX1 to do all the comparisons. Those photo galleries were generated using Apple TV.
***** Thank you for the reply! It seems a great camera, but for me still can't justify to have it alongside my fuji x system... Apple TV? Screensaver function?
Peng Bai On the Apple TV you can use either the slide show or the screensaver to generate galleries - we often have it on while we listen to music.
Another question...with the clear image on, BUT i do not use the zoom, i take the photo in 35mm, will the clear image being on affect my photo, or will it be just as if i had the clear image turned off, because i took the photo in 35mm and DID NOT use the zoom?
That's correct, unless you zoom, there is no clear image effect. I would recommend that you leave it off and crop your photographs in photoshop or lightroom, that will likely provide better results.
Brilliant review and instruction.
Why, thank you!
thanks for this excellent review and the effort you spent for this high quality analyze, not wrapped in salesman words. I appreciate that style very much. There is just one big point, that keeps me away from a purchase of the RX1. I am so used to a zoom. What kind of words do you have to convince me in the that point? Up front, thanks a lot for your answer.
monacopeople If you feel you need a zoom lens, the RX1 is likely not for you. Look a the A7R heilbron.com/sony-a7r-hands-on-review/
Think I've found my "getaway camera" thanks MH
It's an interesting choice. Sony rumours seems to think there's a new one coming soon.
Exceptional review Maarten. What's your opinion of the lack of stabilizer? It sounded like the tendency to selecting 1/80 was not ideal. I wonder if the rx2r will include this and at this late stage in its existence it would be better to wait given the price point. Thanks again.
crow4868 Thanks for your kind comment. For stills, it's usually easy to work around the lack of a stabilizer, for video you'd prefer to shoot with a tripod or monopod. And although 1/80 is not ideal, most of us are using the A,S,M modes, so are not really bothered.
Great review Maarten. I have been considering the RX1R m 2. I need a camera for travel and mountaineering. I am not a professional, I just want a point and shoot that will give me the best possible results. You only get that, once in a life time shot of a sunrise from the top of a mountain. It has to be small, and I can't be carrying/changing lenses on the top of a mountain. Is this the camera for my needs, or would you recommend something else. Thank you very much, John from UK.
While I don't want to knock this camera in any way - it's a powerful and capable device with a large sensor. However, (as someone else who's not a professional) I'd take either the RX100 (I, IV or V) and/or the RX10 III or IV. The RX100 series is small enough to fit in nearly any pocket, yet has all the features you'll ever need - I've loved it every time I've shot with one. The RX10 is larger, but has a most amazing lens, with a 600mm reach, which might be very useful. You'll find reviews on my channel of both. Hope this helps.
Thank you very much for your advice, and great reviews too. I can watch them over and over again. best wishes John.
It's a pleasure to read your comments, thank you.
I bought this camera today, due to your review. Best on the net. I Cant seem to get the auto zoom menu to highlight. Any ideas?
Thanx again.
I appreciate the kind words, but I don't k ow what you mean by "auto zoom" - this camera does not have that feature.
Great review! :)
thanks for the review :)
god review. You should become a professional photo gear narrator.
I’m from saudi “ksa” and i’m in 2018 , thank you for this video , i’m now wait sony rx1r iii .. do you have any news about it ??
Thanks for commenting, and your kind words. No news yet.
Great review
Thanks for your kind words.
i take issue, you absolutely need the optional EVF viewfinder, no way can you see what you are shooting when the sun is bright and on the monitor.......other wise, great job....thanks....
Thanks, I appreciate the kind words.
I realy enjoyed this review :)
I really enjoyed your comment! Thanks for watching and commenting.
Is this worth buying in 2019 or are there better recommended cameras ?
The newer camera, if this style, size and configuration appeals, is the RX1Rm2. Unless you have a desperate need to be at the front of the tech curve, I think, for style, size and configuration, it's still a very good choice.
How do you think it may operate in the rain ?
I wouldn't take it out in a storm, but a few drops won't hurt this or most cameras.
Is this a leaf shutter lens?
+Ethan Vang I've read that it does.
***** Hopefully if doesn't continuously flicker like the lens Fujifilm put on the X100/S/T.
+Ethan Vang Not sure I understand that comment - I didn't notice flickering on either. Do you mean during video recording?
***** The aperture blades continuously hunt when shutter is slightly pressed on the Fuji.
+Ethan Vang Oh, I see. I didn't notice that - I'll keep my eyes open for this in the future.
very good review
nice review! im going to get this camera and sell my a7
I appreciate the kind words, I might find that a little limiting, but I certainly see the appeal. Enjoy!
good review. You should become a professional photo gear narrator.
Im buying this. Great review
Thank you - always nice to read kind words from my viewers.
I like this cameras image quality but the fixed focal length lens is a deal breaker for me.
I think after having good quality zoom lenses going to a fixed focal length lens is more nostalgic than practicable
There are many people who would disagree and enjoy the challenge of shooting with a single prime. The solution is Sony's A7.
Does it has GPS
It doesn't.
10yrs later, it’s still $3K 🤯
But with inflation and the general increase in camera prices, that makes it a better value.
Beware! Sony only seems to have a 3 year lifespan. Then you get a flashing E62.10 message and that's the end of your clear shots
Sadly, all tech seems to have a short life-cycle. I'd try to send it in for repair.
I HAVE THE CAMERA RX1R, THE 2 AS THE SAME LENSE, HOWEVER, ONCE YOU USE THE ZOOM THIS LENS LOSES IT'S ADVANTAGE.......I HAD IT REPAIRED TWICE, BOTH TIMES THE LENS LOST IT'S ABILITY TO FOCUS AND TWICE THE TURN AROUND TIME WAS MORE THAN 3 MONTHS BECAUSE SONY USES OUT SIDE SERVICE AND THEY DO NOT MAINTAIN ANY INVENTORY........I PURCHASED THE VIEW FINDER TWICE BECAUSE I LOST IT ONCE, THE SECOND ONE I FASTENED ON WITH TAPE, IT IS NOW VERY SECURE AND I CAN EASILY REMOVE IT......I PURCHASED THE OPTIONAL VIEWFINDER BECAUSE ON A SUNNY DAY IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE YOUR SUBJECT WITH THE LED SCREEN....AS FAR AS USING THE MACRO LENS SETTING, FORGET IT, I LEAVE THE LENS ON IT'S DEFAULT SETTING.....I HAVE MISSED SHOTS DO TO IT'S SLOW AUTO FOCUSING SYSTEM, I HAVE ALSO EXPERIENCED THE CAMERA NOT BEING ABLE TO FOCUS PROPERLY WITH NO FAULT OF MINE, THIS COULD BE A PROBLEM BUILT INTO THE SYSTEM BECAUSE IT HAS HAPPENED MORE THAN SEVERAL TIMES.....I ALSO HOOKED UP THE LENS CAP SO I WOULD NOT LOSE IT, IT NOW HANGS SECURELY FROM THE CAMERA BODY......I CARRY EIGHT BATTERIES BECAUSE OF THEIR SHORT LIFE, THEY ARE VERY SMALL AND DO NOT PRESENT A PROBLEM TO CARRY.......YES, IT IS A GREA CAMERA IN THE 35MM MODE, THE EHTIRE SET UP COST ME 2,800.00 FOR THE CAMERA AND ANOTHER 500.00 FOR THE VIEW FINDER WHICH IS A MUST HAVE........BOTTOM LINE IS THAT THIS OUTFIT IS TOTALLY PRICED BEYOND COMMON SENSE, I MUST HAVE BEEN UNDER THE INFLUENCE, I MADE THIS PURCHASE BECAUSE I COULD HAVE PURCHASED A STATE OF THE ART 35MM LENS AND PLACED IT ON MY A99 OR A99/2 AND SAVED THOUSANDS AND STILL GOT TERRIFIC IMAGES.........WOULD I PURCHASE THE RX1R2, ABSOLUTELY NOT, I WENT TO TRADE IN THIS MODEL WHICH IS IN EXCELLENT CONDITION AND I WAS OFFERED UNDER 800.00 FOR THE CAMERA AND VIEWFINDER WITH EVERYTHING IT ORIGINALLY CAME WITH, SO I GUESS I WILL DIE WITH IT, THATS 25% OF MY ORIGINAL COST, YET I SEE IT BEING SOLD BY THE PEOPLE WHO SOLD IT TO ME NOW USED FOR JUST UNDER 2,000.00 DOLLARS.....HMMMMMM!.....LOOKS LIKE A GOOD BUSINESS TO BE IN.......
Thanks for your kind words - but it was hard to read, I think your caps lock key is stuck.
In the past 2 years, twice in for repair and parts are hard to come by, both times the camera was in the repair shop more then 2 months waiting for parts, plus Sony farms it's repairs out to a third party....Once you leave the 35mm mode your image quality drops.....Camera is slow to lock focus....Much to expensive just to be used as a 35mm lens camera,, because of this i made mistake purchasing it....My repair problems could be just do to the fact i have a lemon...Either way i can not recommend this camera....
Always nice to hear from someone with first hand experience, thanks for commenting.
Like the lens but can’t afford a $3000 p&s...
Just think, if you'd bought bitcoin, apple, tesla or Netflix when this camera was introduced, you'd be buying one now. Yeah - I dint either.
Picked one up used in mint condition with extras for $400 recently
@@airgreek Your patience has paid off.
Well overpraised.The price should be no more 500 dollars. Micro 43 is much better option if you want small size camera and interchangeable lenses and very good quality.
I don't think it's reasonable to expect a high quality camera with a full frame sensor to be sold at that price. If micro four thirds suits your needs, then I'm glad to hear it satisfies you.
Another great video which I have enjoyed very much. The Sony RX1, RX1R and RX1R Mark II are a great series of cameras. But the price is expensive.
Here in the UK, the Nikon D750 plus 24-120mm F4 lens combination is much cheaper than the RX1. As for the RX1R Mark II, well this is even more expensive.
Having said all of this, if I were to win the lottery, the RX1R Mark II is on my "Cameras to Buy" list along with the Leica Q and Leica SL (plus multiple lenses).
Thanks for your kind words, always appreciated. I too have a "money is no object" list - should I ever become tremendously wealthy.