Criticizing gen1 liveries and comparing them with gen2 ones is just disrespectful to all livery makers. Have you ever proven that you can make good, high quality liveries that are better than the ones in the video? I don't really think so. Please just stop with this stuff, Thank you.
Where did I do such a comparison? Please understand the limitations on both generations; the latter also has its share such as SATCOM shapes. What is demonstrated here is a comparison between these and real aircraft; have understood the constraints and misalignments. Some hint of realism is appreciated. Provide me with the resources, templates, kits, etc. and yours truly shall work his "magic". So much for a healthy community...
@@Carltonus Yeah, I have a couple of airlines and some of them shutdown years ago Thomson - boeing 767 Thomas cook - a320 First choice - a320 and a321 LTU - boeing 757 and l1011 Air Berlin - a320 Spannair - a320 IAE engines Air Europa - 737 800 and a330 200 They're all European airlines
Right, the Comment moderation is set to off for this video... try putting the image IDs (3 Main Livery & Wings) for the Air Europa Boeing 737-800. If that doesn't work, substitute the numbers for letters; with A for "1", B "2", ..., and J "0".
Why you feel the need to criticize older liveries and hold them to the same standards as a professionally hired graphic designer? for one, older liveries may just be an indicator of the person's skill at the time. Gen 1 uvs also tend to strip the quality away from liveries and with a remodel on the horizon this seems pretty pointless. second off, not everyone has the time, patience, or desire to make pixel perfect liveries. end of the day this is a lego game and most livery makers will more often than not have better things to do than to stress over if they got a tiny logo the wrong size or if the registration font is incorrect, and it really feels like you're just nitpicking instead of providing constructive criticism. Also, why do you feel the need to claim you're something you're not? on one of your videos(specifically the one calling out Malaysiaballr/Aerospotter/Msandre) you end off with a Malaysian phrase you clearly googled, most likely before you started recording (the tab with the specific phrase on wikitonary is visible throughout the whole video). then there's the issue of you claiming to be Japanese right in the comments section of this video when you've stated in-game you're (allegedly) filipino. i don't mean to be rude but this does sound a bit pretentious.
Thanks for your comment(s); reviewing liveries for specific aircraft has been a visual alternative to doing the same on the in-game Chat-box, with possible #'s and all, as well as through UA-cam comments/replies. What else regarding Aeronautica I could cover other than the usual flying/sailing, update overviews, etc.? Curious to what degree of "professional graphic design" you perceive of my presentation. Two, perfection is subjective; as long as their elements have significant comparison of their real counterparts, can pass off as "good", "decent", or somewhere that could be improved on. Also taken account is the limitations in the Advanced Customization, if applicable, which will cover in future videos. Three, no Google search was involved; have been wanting to learn as many languages and greetings as possible... while trying not to rely much of machine translations; must admit that I have forgotten to close the tab. The Introduction (in Japanese) was intended to match the first airline livery to be reviewed; nowhere I claimed mine own self to be Japanese by origin. The A340 video began with a Lufthansa featured on the intro, what could I have started with if not a German greeting? No tone of rudeness I have received from reading your comment; in fact, this helps a lot in planning and presenting my next. Reply if I missed something from your end.
Of what authority are you to criticise a livery with no bases whatsoever while you have not demonstrated that you have the skills to even made a livery that matches the quality of the ones your criticise? You provide no constructive criticism, and pick on tiny misplacements and sizes of some logo while not appreciating the time and effort it takes to make a livery. Gen 1 UVs sucks and livery makers are trying their best to overcome it and you're not helping. How about you try and make a livery and let **us** rate it, then you might have the authority to review others.
Save the hot air; what is presented here is comparisons with real aircraft, whether seen in the photographs and such. My words aren't intended to be taken lightly... By admitting that Generation 1 maps "suck", might as well call the majority of advanced livery-capable vehicle templates in the same or similar, as of this update, also in such a boorish manner. Provide me with the resources (templates, kits, etc.) and yours truly will try his best.
You can try it yourself and see how truly bad it is My point is that you provide useless criticism while not appreciating the work that livery makers' efforts
Thus, these are "personal reviews"; you don't have to drag yourself showing off a different resonance. Did you say the "communication server"? One reason for not stepping foot: ua-cam.com/video/ww7GnlvF86A/v-deo.html It's old news, but continues to be applied today. Don't call the Generation 1 maps "bad", just understand the limitations when they were first released, for starters. How long have you been in this "Aeronautica" experience?
@Carltonus 1: The excuse of "personal reviews" is nothing but copium 2: You are just paranoid of Discord 3: I've been in Aeronautica since 2022, long before Roblox calls games "experiences" You have no authority to complain about liverys when you don't make any of them, you are no veteran. You should be glad that they are even public, instead of here neatpicking everything. not every livery design in Aeronautica wants the public to use them.
Thanks for asking, @@martinhumberto4514 . The thing is, you might need to verify your account in order to access the public-liveries channel... at least that's what I read from other players.
Criticizing gen1 liveries and comparing them with gen2 ones is just disrespectful to all livery makers. Have you ever proven that you can make good, high quality liveries that are better than the ones in the video? I don't really think so. Please just stop with this stuff, Thank you.
Where did I do such a comparison? Please understand the limitations on both generations; the latter also has its share such as SATCOM shapes. What is demonstrated here is a comparison between these and real aircraft; have understood the constraints and misalignments. Some hint of realism is appreciated.
Provide me with the resources, templates, kits, etc. and yours truly shall work his "magic".
So much for a healthy community...
You from Japan? Great video too. I like your video of liveries and soon as my PC is fixed I will send you the codes for my liveries.
Nihon kara hito ja nai desu.
The problem is the UA-cam might censor large numbers as in Roblox image IDs; you might need to substitute with letters...
@@Carltonus Oh cool!!! Japan is a very interesting place with beautiful plants, stunning trees and culture. I always wanted to visit.
@@Carltonus Yeah, I have a couple of airlines and some of them shutdown years ago
Thomson - boeing 767
Thomas cook - a320
First choice - a320 and a321
LTU - boeing 757 and l1011
Air Berlin - a320
Spannair - a320 IAE engines
Air Europa - 737 800 and a330 200
They're all European airlines
Right, the Comment moderation is set to off for this video... try putting the image IDs (3 Main Livery & Wings) for the Air Europa Boeing 737-800.
If that doesn't work, substitute the numbers for letters; with A for "1", B "2", ..., and J "0".
Why you feel the need to criticize older liveries and hold them to the same standards as a professionally hired graphic designer?
for one, older liveries may just be an indicator of the person's skill at the time. Gen 1 uvs also tend to strip the quality away from liveries and with a remodel on the horizon this seems pretty pointless.
second off, not everyone has the time, patience, or desire to make pixel perfect liveries. end of the day this is a lego game and most livery makers will more often than not have better things to do than to stress over if they got a tiny logo the wrong size or if the registration font is incorrect, and it really feels like you're just nitpicking instead of providing constructive criticism.
Also, why do you feel the need to claim you're something you're not? on one of your videos(specifically the one calling out Malaysiaballr/Aerospotter/Msandre) you end off with a Malaysian phrase you clearly googled, most likely before you started recording (the tab with the specific phrase on wikitonary is visible throughout the whole video). then there's the issue of you claiming to be Japanese right in the comments section of this video when you've stated in-game you're (allegedly) filipino. i don't mean to be rude but this does sound a bit pretentious.
Thanks for your comment(s); reviewing liveries for specific aircraft has been a visual alternative to doing the same on the in-game Chat-box, with possible #'s and all, as well as through UA-cam comments/replies. What else regarding Aeronautica I could cover other than the usual flying/sailing, update overviews, etc.? Curious to what degree of "professional graphic design" you perceive of my presentation.
Two, perfection is subjective; as long as their elements have significant comparison of their real counterparts, can pass off as "good", "decent", or somewhere that could be improved on. Also taken account is the limitations in the Advanced Customization, if applicable, which will cover in future videos.
Three, no Google search was involved; have been wanting to learn as many languages and greetings as possible... while trying not to rely much of machine translations; must admit that I have forgotten to close the tab. The Introduction (in Japanese) was intended to match the first airline livery to be reviewed; nowhere I claimed mine own self to be Japanese by origin. The A340 video began with a Lufthansa featured on the intro, what could I have started with if not a German greeting?
No tone of rudeness I have received from reading your comment; in fact, this helps a lot in planning and presenting my next. Reply if I missed something from your end.
Nice video what the livery?
Of what authority are you to criticise a livery with no bases whatsoever while you have not demonstrated that you have the skills to even made a livery that matches the quality of the ones your criticise?
You provide no constructive criticism, and pick on tiny misplacements and sizes of some logo while not appreciating the time and effort it takes to make a livery.
Gen 1 UVs sucks and livery makers are trying their best to overcome it and you're not helping.
How about you try and make a livery and let **us** rate it, then you might have the authority to review others.
Save the hot air; what is presented here is comparisons with real aircraft, whether seen in the photographs and such. My words aren't intended to be taken lightly...
By admitting that Generation 1 maps "suck", might as well call the majority of advanced livery-capable vehicle templates in the same or similar, as of this update, also in such a boorish manner.
Provide me with the resources (templates, kits, etc.) and yours truly will try his best.
@Carltonus said resources are in the communication server (ie discord)
You can try it yourself and see how truly bad it is
My point is that you provide useless criticism while not appreciating the work that livery makers' efforts
Thus, these are "personal reviews"; you don't have to drag yourself showing off a different resonance.
Did you say the "communication server"? One reason for not stepping foot: ua-cam.com/video/ww7GnlvF86A/v-deo.html
It's old news, but continues to be applied today.
Don't call the Generation 1 maps "bad", just understand the limitations when they were first released, for starters. How long have you been in this "Aeronautica" experience?
@Carltonus 1: The excuse of "personal reviews" is nothing but copium
2: You are just paranoid of Discord
3: I've been in Aeronautica since 2022, long before Roblox calls games "experiences"
You have no authority to complain about liverys when you don't make any of them, you are no veteran.
You should be glad that they are even public, instead of here neatpicking everything. not every livery design in Aeronautica wants the public to use them.
Where Are The ID's
The IDs can be found on the "Aeronautica Community" server; all these in question should be available in public-liveries channel.
@Carltonus but how do i enter to the public liveries channel
Thanks for asking, @@martinhumberto4514 .
The thing is, you might need to verify your account in order to access the public-liveries channel... at least that's what I read from other players.