How to take a photo of ANDROMEDA GALAXY without a STAR TRACKER!
Вставка
- Опубліковано 3 сер 2024
- In this video I show you how to take a photo of Andromeda Galaxy without a star tracker. This is just how I'd do it so if I've missed something, sorry! If you have any questions, leave them in the comments.
Thanks for watching!
For more photo/video work check out www.charliewoodwardmedia.com
Follow me on Twitter: charli3woodward
Follow me on Instagram: charliewoodwardmedia
My intro is made by Millie: m_j_camera...
PLEASE FLAG SPAM OR HATEFUL COMMENTS! We’re here for a good time :) - Розваги
try stacking pics man with a lot of shots
Lien the video but you should really be using an image stacking software like deepsky stacker or registack. The will create the best picture by reducing noise and focusing better by using a lot of similar pictures.
if you shoot at minimum focal length like 20 or 60 then you can increase the shutter speed to 10 seconds. camera will capture more light. any how your pictures with 1.5 seconds is still impressive. keep making astro videos. i am your new fan.
Glad to see a video which is not an hour long!
Such an inspiration bro... With one shot this is very impressive. 👏👏
Nice introduction on how to take your first shots . I have never done this , so the basics helped me a lot - thank you !
What s/w did you use to edit the images ? Also , what s/w is used to stack the pictures ?
Is there a s/w that combines image editing and stacking ?
Thanks 🙏
Photoshop and autostakkert! Or Deep sky stacker or Sequator
I'm also keen to photograph the Andromeda Galaxy without a star tracker. But Ive got an extra challenge. I'll be shooting it from the southern hemisphere! There is a certain time of year where it is visible here in Australia very briefly but it will be extremely close to the horizon so the clarity won't be great. I'll see what I can capture with an old manual focus 135mm f2.5 lens on M4/3.
Cool bruh!
Good vid, but if you stack like let's say 400 images and even dark frames, you can get a way better shot dude.
For sure, its very hard to stack images of that amount without using a star tracker. It's next to impossible to manually track with just a lens and tripod
@@CharlieWoodwardMedia I've done it and I know alot of other people do it as well, you use a software called deep sky stacker to stack th images, it will auto align them so you don't have to mess around in Photoshop. It works well, but you do need alot of images to make it work as I mentioned
@@justincammidge Thinking about going out tonight with exactly your technique, how many pictures would you think is adequate?
@@amp08021 Bit late but.. take around 400. adjust every 20 shots. Aline in DSS, take dark frames also.
@@none-id3lj I was doing that two nights ago here in the southern hemisphere - shooting without a star tracker. I took over 400 photos of the southern cross and coalsack nebula (within the same frame with a 50mm f1.8 lens.) I readjusted my composition after every few shots. I made sure to capture calibration frames as well. I haven't tried stacking yet but it will be interesting to see what it can do to enhance the final image. Though I was quite happy with the amount of detail I could see in just one single untracked exposure.
Very nice!
Zach Schwab thank you
Egg
Nice, I’ll try tonight what bottle scale location were you in??
Bottle xd
What if you had stacked multiple pictures together, woudn't you get more better result?
Hello, ive been trying to take astrophotograpy for a while, but I only have 70-300 mm 5.6f and a max of 25600 ISO, what should I do ?
take hundreds of photos at high-ish iso settings, then stack them in deep sky stacker
Why dont you use calibration frames it will give more details and less noise
Saw u on bear grylls
what camera did you use?
It's 5d mark 2
5D Mark IV
@@CharlieWoodwardMedia oh sorry 😅
If you want andromeda to look better try stacking multiple photos on top of each other.
won't it become start trails?pls tell me
No, if you stack the images in deepskystacker it will align the images using the stars and it will not become star trails
@@jakubsejbl8004 thanks
@@ramarjun42 You will only get star trails if you leave the shutter open too long. You can take as many photos as you want with shorter shutter speeds and not get star trails. Though you would need to readjust your composition after every few shots so that the stars you're shooting don't move out of the frame.
@@anzaeria I did this exact way. It worked well. Thanks. But I couldn't bring that exact spiral round the galaxy. But I managed to get that in Lightroom. :)
No image stacking?
Mere ek friend ne bhi liya tha andromeda galaxy without telescope ke
I don't have the most essential which is DSLR. That means no chance?
You could get a mirrorless camera instead. There are plenty of mirrorless cameras which have interchangeable lenses like the Panasonic M4/3 system. I would choose Panasonic over Olympus if you want to get into M4/3 because at least one of the Olympus cameras (the OM5) doesn't record any colour information from certain astro subjects. Something I found out today.
@@anzaeria he said „You NEED a DSLR”. I was being sarcastic. I have Sony a7III, but it’s not DSLR
I heard this song from somewhere.Its hawsknet.😂
Charlie can I have a shoutout pls love ur content
Did you know Bear Grylls survival School lavinia
You are doing all the right kind of things but take a look at guys like Nebula Photos on You Tube to see how you can get really cool images of Andromeda with your set up
What the heck, I thought u were gonna stack pics, wut u showed is easy
I wanted to give the most basic tutorial to show what you can shoot without stacking and using a tracker, maybe in the future I’ll do one with a tracker and stacking
Please reply
I think increasinf the exposure for the andromeda is kinda cheating
Why are we whispering?
Charlie please help me please help me please search my girlfriend
💩💩💩