Extent of Reaction for Material Balances

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 31 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 33

  • @SmugMess
    @SmugMess 3 роки тому +10

    9 hours in class on this and this video taught me more in 8 minutes. Super good video!

  • @LearnChemE
    @LearnChemE  10 років тому +14

    This screencast has been reviewed by faculty from other academic institutions.

  • @comicstwisted
    @comicstwisted 6 років тому +4

    this dudes voice is soothing af

  • @letlapafly
    @letlapafly 4 роки тому +2

    I missed this stuff...i wish all mass balance questions were this easy. Extent of reaction approach is definitely easier than the black box.

  • @ianpinto8698
    @ianpinto8698 12 років тому +11

    thank you for all your work. These videos are helping me a great deal.

  • @annnnns
    @annnnns 5 років тому +1

    Your vids helps me alot for my assignment😭😭😭. Thank you

  • @msizatalent
    @msizatalent 4 роки тому +1

    This is Perfect and straight to the point...thank you♡

  • @92swid
    @92swid 11 років тому +2

    I so appreciate this work !!

  • @MK_BABE
    @MK_BABE 5 років тому +10

    how did we get that 6?

    • @pliwer6101
      @pliwer6101 8 місяців тому +2

      S = n(C2H4) / n(C3H6)
      It was given that selectivity is 5 of ethylene to propylene, so S = 5. Ethylene is a produce in the first equation, and propylene is a product in the second equation. This means that the first equation produces 5 times more mols than the second equation.
      5 = (S1 - S2) / S2
      then just by looking at that you can pick some numbers that make that true, so the simplest ones are S1 = 6, and S2 = 1
      therefor,
      S1 = 6*S2
      If I am wrong someone correct me please, this is my guess after they skipped a lot of steps :(

  • @zuhairaamahomed6278
    @zuhairaamahomed6278 2 роки тому +1

    hi, if theres a recycle stream will na0 be the fresh feed or the amt entering reactor ie including recycle

  • @loganblanc3864
    @loganblanc3864 8 років тому +1

    My textbook, "Elementary Principles of Chemical Processes, 4th edition, Felder"
    indicates that the extent of reaction is dimensionless. My professor along with class thought this must of been a mistake, but he contacted the author, and was convinced that it is in fact, dimensionless. Will it mess me up to assume that there is a unit? I don't see why it would be unitless, because saying the extent of reaction is 30, doesn't really tell us anything

    • @Bilal626339
      @Bilal626339 7 років тому +2

      There should be a unit as firstly the equation is: moles out = moles in + (stoichiometric coefficient x extent of reaction)... Now any equation where you are adding or subtracting two variables to give another, they all have to have the same units. If the extent of reaction was dimensionless you could not add it to the amount of moles in which would have units of moles or moles per unit time etc. Best way to think of it and it'd help you further on in Chemical Engineering is any two things added together have to have the same units and it's one thing my professor has stressed to pay attention to the units it can help you solve problems and avoid silly mistakes.

    • @garekbushnell4763
      @garekbushnell4763 7 років тому

      My professor said something like this. He was talking about the unit going on the stoichiometric coefficient in front of the extent of reaction.

  • @generaleditor
    @generaleditor 10 років тому +1

    Very good video. Thank you.

  • @mstoner7263
    @mstoner7263 6 років тому +1

    why is initial C2H4 canceled out from the second equation? I dont understand that.

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  6 років тому

      Thanks for the question. It is marked out because that is the term for how much C2H4 we started with, which was zero.

    • @mstoner7263
      @mstoner7263 6 років тому

      @@LearnChemE Appreciate your time, thank you!

  • @hiei1290
    @hiei1290 12 років тому +2

    Can you use the same equation for mass flow?

    • @DKTPAirsoft
      @DKTPAirsoft 7 років тому +1

      Unfortunately, no, because the Extent of Reaction Method is used using stoichiometric ratios (the reason there is a 2 in front of zai 2 etc.) and the only time we can use stoichiometric ratios is when we work in moles (n), or at least thats what my book says!

  • @ganeshmareedu1807
    @ganeshmareedu1807 5 років тому +1

    How to find the degrees of freedom?

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  5 років тому

      Try this video: ua-cam.com/video/tW1ft4y5fQY/v-deo.html

  • @Xeon1791
    @Xeon1791 12 років тому +1

    very helpful , thanks :)

  • @artemisc749
    @artemisc749 8 років тому +2

    nice video

  • @buaruangyenjia7281
    @buaruangyenjia7281 6 років тому +2

    Thx very mush

  • @radclyffeja
    @radclyffeja 12 років тому +2

    WOW What does he tell right now?

  • @kennydickinson8266
    @kennydickinson8266 6 років тому +1

    Thanks this was a helpful video

  • @amuri9797
    @amuri9797 4 роки тому

    Hey, how you see that the extent of reaction 1 is 6 times exent reaction of 2? How do you find £1? I dont understand how you go from S=£1-£2/£2 to £1=6£2

    • @saadabdk1143
      @saadabdk1143 4 роки тому +2

      We know that
      n(C2H6) = 100 - £1 - £2
      And from fractional conversion we find n(C2H6) as 30
      Then, substituting we get
      ¹ £1 + £2 = 70
      Now, how I've done it is that we know the selectivity is 5 then
      n(C2H4) / n(C3H6) = 5
      n(C2H4) = 5* n(C3H6) = 5* £2 (From C3H6 Balance)
      We substitute this in C2H4 Balance so we get
      5*£2 = £1 - £2 >> 6*£2 = £1
      Going back to our first equ we substitute to get
      £1 + £2 = 70 >>> 7*£2 = 70
      After that, you have found extent of 2nd rection, you use it to fing 1st and then everything else.
      Sorry for being late

  • @mucahidtasci8197
    @mucahidtasci8197 6 років тому

    I'd like to know why we cant just simply do this: There's 5 moles of ethylene forming for every mole of propylene. We know that a total of 70 moles of ethane reacts. So we can just do 5/6 x 70 = moles of ethylene formed and 1/6 x 70 for the moles of propylene formed?

    • @LearnChemE
      @LearnChemE  6 років тому +1

      Great question. In this case, the ethylene is also a reactant in the second equation, so some of what is produced is also consumed. That is why it becomes a bit more difficult and you need to go through these steps. Thanks for the question!

  • @Xeon1791
    @Xeon1791 12 років тому +2

    Pardon me ?

  • @elljorgo
    @elljorgo 3 роки тому

    NAO ENTENDII