@Indian Boyyy Interesting！So you mean, because your country is a "democratic country" so your government is incompetent, then your citizens must be poor and they can't change their lives, right?
Vaishali Saindhane In western country, counter-urbanization happened after urbanization. Which means people choose to live in rural place. But for most of developing countries, rural area is much less developed, which means poverty. Meanwhile, some of china’s rural area are now become more rich than city residents.
Everything in this and other videos are interrelated directly or indirectly. One factor changes the others toooo directly or inversly. So everything sort of makes sense.
@@lilchad-ig1oj No, capitalism. It was only after the introduction of capitalism to the then communist China by the then leader, Deng XiaoPing, did China see an unprecedented economic growth, which subsequently saw the decline of the rural population.
@@endeliggnist5066 then why capitalism didn't make the trick to the majority of developing countries? btw，it is very interesting now with commie China being more developed than the majority of countries of capitalism.
I think the description of "one child policy" is a little bit inaccuracy. In China's rural area, you can have the second child when the first is a girl, but in urban area, you can have the second one only the first one has any mental or physical disability, nothing to do with gender. moreover, in some poorest regions. This policy was even not operated. last, under any condition, only if you lost your first child, people can have the second one. There are so many other exceptions. this is not a law in china, it is more like a regulation, it operated case by case.
The reason that families live in rural areas can have a second child if the first is a girl is because most of them hold household registration of type 'agriculture'. So a great number of them make a living on farming which requires huge amount of labour force. Normally males are physically stronger than females and having only one girl might not be able to support the family, so it's better for them to have a second one.
And you forgot to mention that in urban areas, you could have more children by paying a fee, and those children would not get all the social benefits like medical and free schooling etc. But could at least make sure that the child is born rich. That's why they need to pay that heavy fee.
I'm living in a small village in the north of Vietnam. People are trying to work and live in the cities. I'm still here and taste fresh food and air 🤗🤗
@@soc_ma_deck4471 oh i got a disease , but no worry , the highly advanced hospital with all international facilities is just near me , let's go Oh poor mofos living in no where , maybe they shouls rely on god for that
Percentage is not as important as absolute numbers. 890 million village idiots in India...you seem like one Apu...use condoms and stop wobbling your heads....freaks!!!
@@rabbit-nq7uh Such an uneducated supremacist bastard you are..and India also have 500 million urban population. For almost last 5000 years, India has highest population because of fertile land and rivers. India's total Fertility rate is only 2.3 and declining fast.
I'm one of the Chinese whose family moved from rural area to the urban (joining the giant crowd that resulted in China's rural population declined since 1992 as 2:11 shows) and my parents worked at least 14 hours a day (literally) six days a week in the factory. Yes we didn't have so-called 'human rights' but we no longer need to starve to death (and I know that's hard to imagine for people from developed countries that there is something more critical than freedom or human rights for poor people like us) We were tired, dirty(you can imagine how polluted the factory was) and happy (I could finally eat tomatoes in winter), and for sure yes I was one of those 'joyful' child labor. 25 years passed and I'm still grateful for, instead of hating, that period. Last month U.S. Senator Marco Rubio criticized China for.' _developing economy based on abusing human rights against the general value_ '. I feel so sad to read this. It's not like so, Senator. It's people like my parents who devoted their life _with happiness_ into those hard labor, making goods days and nights, so that people like you can enjoy the plentiful products displayed at Costco or IKEA. There are things more important than the ambiguous 'human rights' to us, and I would much appreciate if you could stand on the lower-class people's stance, and respect that kind of diversity of the world.
As an American I don't want products made in China. I do NOT enjoy your products. I want them gone. They ruin our economy and put Americans out of work. I want tariffs and embargoes. Send it all back.
@@Novusod First, Made in China goods didn't ruin the economy, instead, it boosted the giant companies in U.S. and EU. Don't buy the propaganda of politicians so easily. They would say anything to gain votes for campaign. Besides, the results of tariffs would very probably be that you get products mostly made in India or Vietnam by the end. Or, unless you can instruct Mr.Trump to tariff every country in the world and finally you get Made in U.S. everywhere. Congrats on that.
@@Novusod If there's no product made in China, can you imagine what will happen in the low-income families lived in the states? Or can you imagine how's average American families' feelings about the coming Thanksgiving? Plz remember it is the capital who moved factories to developing countries and they don't care about what you want.
@@ZoeZhyful If there was no trade with China then the poor in would have better paying jobs. Indeed you are correct that capital is the problem. Trade with China made a handful of billionaires very rich at the expense of the working class who lost their jobs when the factories moved to china. There will be no Thanksgiving this year. There is nothing to be thankful for. America is an empire in decline. Get ready for the Chinese century, it is coming.
@@chandrashekharhindu9433 India being at top is not a bad sign at all. We already feed our huge population but If we could just start using more of technology into into our agriculture we would be exporting goods to other countries.
@@dineshdevjibishnoi hunger in India is increasing due to no control on population , India is overpopulated according to it's area and resources. Just look at hunger index
@@dduay being part of rural population does not mean bad buddy......Agricultre...various types of farming.....best quality of dairy products....and better air quality is there in rural area ....rural has just drawback of lack of high std education....which INDIA is working upon
Being an Indian guess what will be our biggest challenge or question? Population or poverty? Nope It's what Ayodhya will get, a temple or a mosque. You can change government or administrators of any country but can't change its people.
But there is an hidden truth here you r thinking on poverty & population from ur view Ayodhya is a small issue but why its not possible to tackle the smaller issue then how can you solve the bigger one indian poor s are pretty much Happy and Mentally stable than European & US citizens but because of slow court system india is falling No beaurocracy cares first we need to focus on court system rather than poverty and population..
@@markshao3901 There are some areas in Sao Paulo and Parana that were colonized by Japanese. They still conserve the Japanese language as spoken and written in 1910s. Sometimes, Japanese linguists came here to see firsthand how their language changed. So, some Brazilians look like the ethnic Japanese they are.
@@markshao3901 Well, Brazil is made by immigrants, so we have a mix of ethnicities and culture all together, we have a lot Japanese people (actually Outside Japan, Brazil it's the country with more Japanese People in the world), German people, Italian people, African people and Middle East people...
Why people think rural and slums are same. Rural areas refers to agricultural and agro- industrial region. Countries with high rural population means their population is engaged in agricultural related activities. Like India's 25% GDP comes just from growing crops. Clear your mind and get education and respect everyone
Never look down upon rural populations, their connection with nature, common sense thinking, work habits and clarity of life is something that us city folk greatly lack. 🙏🙏
@Lakshmi Rani Sarker Bhai Kabhi village Gaye bhi ho ... I bet you do not have even 1% of the common sense that the villagers have. If we try to inculcate the work ethics that they follow , we will be a totally different person for the good .
Divya Sri what's ur problem i like village more than my city it's so natural and here in city only pollution dirt vehicles horns poo poo day and night.
Living in rural area, it doesn't mean you're poor. It just a choice. Many rich people choose living in rural area because they can become mad if they live in a city that full of air pollution, traffic, criminals, stress etc
Bus ye logon ko souch hai...I m son of farmer...Bht se zada urban se zada pesa but agr sb log city chaly to city pe burde ho jata hai jesy karachi lahore delhi mumbai pe burden hai
It's not that bad actually. India was populated since the start. Currently the fertility rate is 2.50. Trust me, this is a good rate. It will be more less in future. You can also contribute to this by not having more than two children.
@@toufikbiswas9737 2.5 is not good rate......don't try to hide the BAD THINGS....😡😡😡👉👉👉2 childs should be max......CHINA adopted 1 child....and today...its fertility rate is
@@chandrashekharhindu9433 It was higher before. It was nearly 6 in the past. It was probably the most fertile country in the world. So now, 2.50 is definitely good and it's going reduce more in the future.
@@toufikbiswas9737 every country had more fertility rates in the past. But the thing is most of them countered it with education/strong control laws. India's already huge population continues to grow with just ⅓ of the land of China. It is a matter of concern.
@@dineshdevjibishnoi Tf? Seriously? Why the fuck is population increasing then? Population is not a concern. Unproductive population is. Every country can turn its population into a productive one. India can too. For your information, there are countries with 7+ even now. Be grateful that India is not among those countries.
Pakistan- my rural population is more than the rural population of the European Union. 😎😎 India - calm down bro, my rural population is more than the entire population of Europe 😏🤣 Pakistan- 😩😩😩
Another important thing which most people especially westerners don't understand over here is that remote rural areas don't necessarily mean bad . There are many rural villages with good quality lives with reliable income and happy lifestyles . And you have millions living in worst loving conditions in the Bollywood mega city of Mumbai . Enough to say how rural and urban can't always be substituted for backward and progressed respectively
@@bluefairy7304 keep living in 1950s . More 89% of Indian household (including rural ones ) have toilet now . 96%+ of Indian population has access to toilet . The new govt (which has been in power since 2014) took measures to ensure sanitation problems are eradicated from India and this has been by far the most effective and successful project of the govt . In 2012,only 51% of population had toilet access now it is 96%+ . I myself had to travel through very poor rural areas recently and could clearly see the difference and the massive improvement in sanitation . So if you want to continue to beleive that India is still just another poor backward country then keep living in dreams lol
Why people consider rural areas bad? I love having pure food rather than canned food. And life is also much more beautiful in rural areas than industrialised and deserted urban areas. During Antichrist time, you all will miss rural life. Because there would be no pure food, pure milk, pure honey and pure life.
We need more cities in India more rural population indicates people are too much dependent on farming and thats why per capita farm income is very low..
@@anitoshpaswan309 Half of my family stays in village in kutch, people doing only farming don't have good income , only there basic needs are covered, while water is another problem. As family grows more land will be divided so lesser the income, with small land and unpredictable rainfall only modern technique and few people involved can make farming profitable..
Excellent choice of category to measure. With different conflicting trends underlying the data. It's also great to see graphics that doesn't follow the expected preconception that "bigger = better, shrinking = worsening". This has more nuance to it.
Bangladeshi rural population began to decline from 2017. Government has taken a project named "my village, my city". Hope within 2027 entire Bangladesh will turn into a city. Over density is the key reason behind the prospect. Government is making hosing project for all the people with all modern facilities. Every citizen will get planned & modern housing within 2035.
@@foreverdreamer9171 LoL I think u are taking some expired Weeds, look at statistics BDesh growth is below 1.3% in 2019, In fact u India are producing like PIGs.
@Joy Mohammad I am an indian, and this indo bangla hatred is generally because of 1. Cricket 2. West Bengal being a lefty state and other indians not liking it, its not actually Bangladesh's fault, as a matter of fact, BD has a huge opportunity to grow with India economically, considering you have a huge and concentrated population and access to sea, if Northern India and Bangladesh work together with upcoming Sagarmala projects in Hooghly and Ganga river, Bengal delta could become a major shipping Hub
I've been scrolling down the comment section, and I've noticed a lot of people are saying that having a large rural population is good because it means there'll be a larger labour force for growing more food. Well no. Having more people in the countryside doesn't mean there'll be a greater food supply. If you want food supplies to increase, then your best chance is to purchase food from abroad. Why else do you think globalisation is a thing. If you can't provide yourself want you needor want, buy it from someone else. Finding out how many people are living in rural areas can help determine how successfully a country has been developing. What should be happening in emerging countries is enormous numbers of people from the rural areas migrating to cities. There should be an overall decline in the number of rural-dwelling inhabitants and a big increase in people living in urban settlements. Whats happening in countries like Brazil and Indonesia are good examples of this occurance, China even more so. People in the countryside of developing countries don't want to stay in a life of farming. Almost all people living the countrysides of India are living in permanent poverty. They want to find a better job, earn a decent living, provide for their families. It is easier to find employment in the cities than in the rural periphery. This is why they want to move to cities as it provides more opportunities for them. If you were in the position of these people, you would think exactly like this. You (someone who lives in or near an urban-sprawl) would think its good that there's many people in rural areas, but in the eyes of the people in the countryside, its the exact opposite. So in conclusion, yes I suppose that a big rural population means a chance to grow more food, but you have to bear in mind that the most majority of those farmers don't want this life. If India continues to have a large and growing rural population, the country and especially its people as a whole won't develop as well as you think it would.
money should be spent on agriculture technology. 50% of indias labor force works for agriculture and they only bring under 10% of gdp contribution. that is a big wastage.
What they want show about rural population. I belong to rural area and i am happy. It doesn't make any sense. I am thinking if somebody helps me to know whether its good or bad 🤔🤔🤔🤔
As a Pakistani I know the rural population is decreasing, We were also living in rural area but almost 10 years ago my family and my all relatives came to urban areas And in previous 10-15 years many people have came to urban areas, And I think india's data is also wrong.
I think you misunderstood it... Rural population is still growing because of their fertility rate. But it is actually growing at a slower pace whereas Urban population is growing faster than ever in both the countries. It is better to look at Percentage of urban-rural population by time
The Chinese economic reform that was started in 18 December 1978, led the serious gap between poverty and wealth. Excessive taxation, local corruption and declining services are problems faced by many people in the countryside. That's why Chinese Village was Drained by Migrant Labor. The decreasing rural population from 1995 could have lived hard time. We just watch the numbers now, but the number one and one was each person's life. If you know about the history, you should enjoy this chart more.
Well rural population doesn't mean that poor but condition of Indian agriculture sector is very backward technology compared to other countries. India just have to improve it's technology in agriculture and they will see a boom in Indian economy. In the state of punjab there are farmers that own Mercedes and other luxury cars. And the people here saying that due to largest rural population india will never develop let me tell them that its just a matter of advanced tech and literacy rate of Indian villages that could literally skyrocket Indian farmer's wealth. Farming is not bad when you can own Mercedes and a large bungalow.
Pakistan is still 7 to 8 times smaller in comparison to India.. Although in area Pakistan is 4 times smaller but in population Pakistan is 8 times smaller.. Lol
@@HassanAskari-vt4do Punjab isn't even half the size of uttar Pradesh which has 25 crore population but area is almost same as Pakistan Punjab.. Whole Pakistan is smaller than UP(UTTAR PRADESH) in population..HAHA
@@kevintheminion1497 yeah thats why india is seen as a future superpower and not pakistan. İt is only because india has 8 times more manpower than pakistan..
Brazil (my country) was one of the countries that had the most rural exodus of people to the cities this is due to the Juscelino Kubitscheck policy with the construction of Brasilia (Capital of the Country) which in 20 years already has 6 million people, this Here are a lot of people who migrated from rural areas in a short time, besides we have the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro one of them is the most populous in America.
@Tejas Misra Far ever my knowledge concerns , India shares lot of problems from its border dispute to poverty problems unlike China so it's obvious to see India lagging behind china in infrastructure , industry. I been to Mumbai , that city is quite good in infrastructure with lot of big skylines , metros , Industry but it shares lot of problems of slums . So these basic things indirectly affect on other Index of country .
Why come On? It's better if indian goverments focus on education sector and agricultural engg, huge population with better tech can feed the entire world for years and provide fantastic export potential too, better to have well governed villages than huge cities that do not value human life
O Brasil (meu país), foi um dos países que mais teve o exodo rural de pessoas para as cidades isso se deve a política Juscelino Kubitscheck com construção de Brasília (Capital do País) que em 20 anos já tem 6 milhões de pessoas, isso aqui é muita pessoas que migraram das áreas rurais em pouco tempo, além disso temos as cidades de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro uma delas é mais populosas da America.
A política de urbanização já vem bem antes do período JK, desde os anos 20 o Brasil começou a se urbanizar rapidamente. Agora a colonização do Norte/Centro-Oeste teve impulso na gestão de JK realmente, acredito que vc tenha se confundido nesse ponto. E o DF e entorno tem quase 4,5 milhões de pessoas e não 6 milhões nos dias atuais.
@@dotpls that's a subjective statement, I live in a rich village, for me overcrowded cities are depressing where people are used as a resource rather than being treated as a person
Fat Schize the word "rich" and "village" can never go together, ESPECIALLY if you're indian. i've lived in a village in europe and it was awful, and now i live in a large city. im happy and make enough money to buy most luxuries now.
@@tamalsengupta5377 yeah.. i know that but for government, prior goal should be providing job & technology into their city/town/village... So judging a country based on these type of comparison are totally wrong. There is nothing wrong to live in a village or small town.
@@shivigupta6878 I don't think being connected with your root does any help in the long run urbanization is important it is probably the only way a country can provide better education , Healthcare and employment to its people also its very good for controlling its population and by urbanization i mean controlled urbanization not some kind of unplanned mass migration
@@dotpls True, that's probably the reason why indian governments haven't been able to control population explosion, they are focusing in the wrong places
@@vitorleite3095 both are needed . Without adequate agriculture you don't have food to eat so no chance of living . And without technology development you will have backward infrastructure and facilities .
Nice data visualization. Though I don't think the comparison in this video has much meaning. The quality of rural life differs from country to country. The reason for the decline in the rural population can be urbanization which is usually but not necessarily a sign of progress or a decline in the total population which is alarming.
China’s urbanization rate has increased from 30% to the current 60%. It took 40 years to complete. The target for China’s urbanization rate is 70%. It will take at least 10 to 20 years. An urbanization rate of 70% is a reasonable ratio for China. Because of the flat terrain in northern China, agriculture can be intensive and large-scale, which greatly improves agricultural efficiency. Now northern China is also the main producer of food in China. However, in the hills and mountains of northwest and southwest China, agricultural development has always been restricted, with cash crops as the mainstay, and a large agricultural population is needed.
Hay que tener en cuenta también la proporción, pero eso no quita que la India sea especialmente grave por la gestión tan masiva que se tendrá que hacer para la distribución de la población. Si quieren llevar gente a las ciudades, tendrán que construir incluso más rápido y en mayores cantidades que China, ya que su población está creciendo aún más rápido que la de su vecino.
I guess thts could possibly be the only chart that you will see China moving down the ranking order for total rural population. Another possible one would be birth rate/total population. Urbanisation is a sign of modernisation, but rapid urbanisation may bring a few environmental and societal issues. However, if it's well managed, is actually a gd thing.
this video really explain why liziqi has become one of the most successful Influencer in China,Just look at the tremendous amount of Urbanized population.
2017 Philippines has beaten USA Philippines: *happy filipino screams* USA: *INTERNAL SCREAMING* 2018 back to normal Philippines: *angry filipino voices* USA: *national anthem plays*
I live in a village. I have Electricity,water, telephone, internet, gas pipeline to supply natural gas for cooking and could also use electric equipment for cooking, proper under ground drainage system, can buy almost every thing from supermarkets. Easy transportation to go anywhere then how am I living in poverty?. Most of people living here are in good financial condition. I fail to understand what more a city can offer me, polluted air and crowded pathways and metro stations?? Naah, I am good :)
This is a common misconception urban indians have because they watch news which are either foreign that focus on shithole cities like delhi or north indian villages in UP bihar and Jharkhand and eastern maharashtra which are bad generally
@@rohitkashyap321 ye parshan houny ki bt ni humra south asia k agriculture country hain rural awam hogi agriculture achi hogi urban pe burden kam hoga...Warna lahore or Karachi ka burden to apko pata hai
@@chaitulion2672 that sounds stupid af... Have a look at the % of urban-rural population data. Both India and Pakistan are at 35% respectively (2021). But India is Urbanizing faster than Pakistan.
One small error about the explanation of one child police of China: each family only can have one child whether the first one is girl or boy, except ethnic minorities.
Never going to happen. Bashing China is politically correct in the west, so is Nobel Peace Prize. If you make China look bad, then you will probably win the prize; if you actually make China a better place, you are out of luck for the Prize.
@@gugsX98 What they are doing? You mean these: 1. HongKong Police use his throat to cut the knife of peaceful protester ua-cam.com/video/4ggO8p9DAlM/v-deo.html 2. Chinese Banker use his face to hit the fist of of peaceful protester ua-cam.com/video/X-GR88q8pIw/v-deo.html What the China doing in Hong Kong is really bad!! LOL.
@@gugsX98 China government did nothing to Hong Kong except providing economic support. All the shit is between Hong Kong government and Hong Kong people.
The CCP leaders that ruled China inbetween Mao and Xi actually deserve Nobel peace prize as they were the one who made China the powerhouse it is today but Xi is now ruining China's international image by bullying and threatening all of China's neighbouring countries and disturbing peace in Asia.
Many people in the chat have misinterpreted I guess.. Declining Rural Population is NOT good at all.. A country Depends upon Rural Population for Food..Is there's no one to Grow Food in Rural areas then who tf will provide food?? Correct me if I am wrong! 😁😅
Well if you guys think Rural Population is useless and Urban Population is very rich and important, then you are wrong because Rural population doesn't create pollution and Urban Population does creates a lot of Pollution
@@marveljason7533 I think you are.. agriculture only contributes 15% of Indian economy but 60% of our population is depend on agriculture... And not all farmers can grow crops in their land... Those who live in slums are most probably one of those farmers
indian gov shows more focus on rural development and agricultral growth which is good rather then converting rural areas into urban by building another stream of unemployed population💪💪
@@toufikbiswas9737 Nope, it's not the future, rural and urban population should have a balance. Look at China, the amount of pollution is concentrated only along the costal line.
@@manjunathmmp I already given you two examples. Now you can think whatever you want. Wherever there is people, it needs to be urbanised. Netherlands and Belgium have denser population than India. But check how beautiful they look. Urbanisation is the future. To be precise, it's sustainable urbanisation.
@@toufikbiswas9737 There is no need to urbanize everything in this world. Also please look into Belgium and Netherlands contribution to Global CO2 emission per capita and this year in Europe the summer was extreme. This is one example of over urbanization
@@manjunathmmp Dude, you are forgetting that Netherlands is heavily industrialised country. If it was just villages there instead of cities, the carbon footprint would not be much different. Most of the Dutches use waterways, bicycles and public transport. They use technology to reduce pollution. Heat storm is happening everywhere. I will say it again. If there are people in a place, it needs to urbanise. Urbanisation is the future.
@Henonaga What? So urban population living in poverty is considered rural population? And the suburbs of Budapest, for example, or villages that are considered part of Zurich metropolitan area are considered "rural population" in that sense?
I don't know about other countries but high rural population for India is a good sign. If they move to cities then illegal occupation of land rises. So it's better they stay in the village and develop their itself.
China has made great achievements in poverty alleviation
How does rural=poor?
@@scienceworld2880 Rural = less developed area = less opportunities = less jobs = less productivity = less trade = less income = less spending = poor
@Indian Boyyy Interesting！So you mean, because your country is a "democratic country" so your government is incompetent, then your citizens must be poor and they can't change their lives, right?
@Indian Boyyy That's a good thing if a country like India where 70% of wealth is horded by 3% of population
Vaishali Saindhane In western country, counter-urbanization happened after urbanization. Which means people choose to live in rural place. But for most of developing countries, rural area is much less developed, which means poverty. Meanwhile, some of china’s rural area are now become more rich than city residents.
even here china has managed to make the most extreme changes over the last 10 years like in every other video
It is astonishing what a little bit of capitalism can do to a nation.
Endelig Gnist communism*
Everything in this and other videos are interrelated directly or indirectly. One factor changes the others toooo directly or inversly. So everything sort of makes sense.
@@lilchad-ig1oj No, capitalism. It was only after the introduction of capitalism to the then communist China by the then leader, Deng XiaoPing, did China see an unprecedented economic growth, which subsequently saw the decline of the rural population.
@@endeliggnist5066 then why capitalism didn't make the trick to the majority of developing countries?
btw，it is very interesting now with commie China being more developed than the majority of countries of capitalism.
I think the description of "one child policy" is a little bit inaccuracy. In China's rural area, you can have the second child when the first is a girl, but in urban area, you can have the second one only the first one has any mental or physical disability, nothing to do with gender. moreover, in some poorest regions. This policy was even not operated. last, under any condition, only if you lost your first child, people can have the second one. There are so many other exceptions. this is not a law in china, it is more like a regulation, it operated case by case.
Yes, this comment is very accurate.
Yep, most of my friends (90's ) from the rural area of Southeast China have more than 1 sister/brother
The reason that families live in rural areas can have a second child if the first is a girl is because most of them hold household registration of type 'agriculture'. So a great number of them make a living on farming which requires huge amount of labour force. Normally males are physically stronger than females and having only one girl might not be able to support the family, so it's better for them to have a second one.
And you forgot to mention that in urban areas, you could have more children by paying a fee, and those children would not get all the social benefits like medical and free schooling etc. But could at least make sure that the child is born rich. That's why they need to pay that heavy fee.
@Tango Zulu Lucky him!!! One of the rare places in China with good weather! No harsh winters and very nice weather! Fuck Beijing and Shanghai tbh!
I'm living in a small village in the north of Vietnam. People are trying to work and live in the cities. I'm still here and taste fresh food and air 🤗🤗
*Respect +*
@@EngineeredFemale thanks 🤗🤗
Can yo ride this awesome bullet train ?
NOPE !
@@zuboy4272 can you hear car horns?
You: Yes
@@soc_ma_deck4471 oh i got a disease , but no worry , the highly advanced hospital with all international facilities is just near me , let's go
Oh poor mofos living in no where , maybe they shouls rely on god for that
Make this video showing percentage of rural population.
Percentage is not as important as absolute numbers. 890 million village idiots in India...you seem like one Apu...use condoms and stop wobbling your heads....freaks!!!
rabbit 20000 oh shutup every family here have 2 to 4 children. Look into west they always have 6 to 10 children in each family .
@@rabbit-nq7uh how can u say village idiots in India
@@rabbit-nq7uh Such an uneducated supremacist bastard you are..and India also have 500 million urban population. For almost last 5000 years, India has highest population because of fertile land and rivers. India's total Fertility rate is only 2.3 and declining fast.
Hari Shankar not true lol
Rural doesn't mean poor. In developed countries at least.
fjellyo32 nah but countries with higher urbanisation tend to be more developed like Australia Singapore Japan and others
@@EpicCorn0 in Australia you can't live so easily in the outback so it makes sense.
fjellyo32 same with japan in their mountains, they all
Hug coastal regions with flat plains that only make up so much area in the country
fjellyo32 well, in China basically rural =poor
@@mmxx7140 in china everything with less than a million inhabitants is rural^^
In 2030 the top 10 will be :
1. India
2. China
3. Pakistan
4. Nigeria
5. Ethiopia
6. Indonesia
7. Bangladesh
8. Egypt
9. Philippines
10. DR Congo
Thinh Hoang that's right!
indonesian who live in village move to the city so much, and the familiy planing is sucsess, the women just can birth 0-2 only childs
I'm one of the Chinese whose family moved from rural area to the urban (joining the giant crowd that resulted in China's rural population declined since 1992 as 2:11 shows) and my parents worked at least 14 hours a day (literally) six days a week in the factory. Yes we didn't have so-called 'human rights' but we no longer need to starve to death (and I know that's hard to imagine for people from developed countries that there is something more critical than freedom or human rights for poor people like us) We were tired, dirty(you can imagine how polluted the factory was) and happy (I could finally eat tomatoes in winter), and for sure yes I was one of those 'joyful' child labor.
25 years passed and I'm still grateful for, instead of hating, that period. Last month U.S. Senator Marco Rubio criticized China for.' _developing economy based on abusing human rights against the general value_ '. I feel so sad to read this. It's not like so, Senator. It's people like my parents who devoted their life _with happiness_ into those hard labor, making goods days and nights, so that people like you can enjoy the plentiful products displayed at Costco or IKEA. There are things more important than the ambiguous 'human rights' to us, and I would much appreciate if you could stand on the lower-class people's stance, and respect that kind of diversity of the world.
The governmemt don't help you?
As an American I don't want products made in China.
I do NOT enjoy your products. I want them gone. They ruin our economy and put Americans out of work.
I want tariffs and embargoes. Send it all back.
@@Novusod
First, Made in China goods didn't ruin the economy, instead, it boosted the giant companies in U.S. and EU. Don't buy the propaganda of politicians so easily. They would say anything to gain votes for campaign.
Besides, the results of tariffs would very probably be that you get products mostly made in India or Vietnam by the end.
Or, unless you can instruct Mr.Trump to tariff every country in the world and finally you get Made in U.S. everywhere. Congrats on that.
@@Novusod If there's no product made in China, can you imagine what will happen in the low-income families lived in the states? Or can you imagine how's average American families' feelings about the coming Thanksgiving? Plz remember it is the capital who moved factories to developing countries and they don't care about what you want.
@@ZoeZhyful If there was no trade with China then the poor in would have better paying jobs.
Indeed you are correct that capital is the problem. Trade with China made a handful of billionaires very rich at the expense of the working class who lost their jobs when the factories moved to china.
There will be no Thanksgiving this year. There is nothing to be thankful for. America is an empire in decline.
Get ready for the Chinese century, it is coming.
The only difference is that, a lot of people who live in rural areas in America are wealthy farm owners. And almost all are there by choice.
Absolutely. And American urban areas are not in the same league of Vietnam's urban area.
That's somewhat true...and also false. Many poor people, particularly white people, live in rural America.
love you my Bangladesh 🇧🇩🇧🇩
Dan love indonesia 🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩🇮🇩
Love all 🇨🇳🇩🇿🇧🇩🇮🇳
love you 🇨🇳❤️🇧🇩
Love from India ❤
Love from China ❤️❤️🇨🇳🇨🇳
Whats Dan? Must be an eastern thing in the world
YAY! China isn't number one for once! 😂
Behind India by some margin to :-o
But it remained number 1 till 2003
@@chandrashekharhindu9433 India being at top is not a bad sign at all. We already feed our huge population but If we could just start using more of technology into into our agriculture we would be exporting goods to other countries.
@The Sun what did he say? dont understand this english
@@dineshdevjibishnoi hunger in India is increasing due to no control on population , India is overpopulated according to it's area and resources. Just look at hunger index
India finally beat China at something!
For good or for bad?
@@dduay being part of rural population does not mean bad buddy......Agricultre...various types of farming.....best quality of dairy products....and better air quality is there in rural area ....rural has just drawback of lack of high std education....which INDIA is working upon
Not a negative sign though. India has always/traditionally been a agriculture driven economy.
@@chandrashekharhindu9433 agreed. Need the technological advancement in agriculture field to boost production.
@@dineshdevjibishnoi Keep dreaming baba
Being an Indian guess what will be our biggest challenge or question?
Population or poverty?
Nope
It's what Ayodhya will get, a temple or a mosque.
You can change government or administrators of any country but can't change its people.
Indeed bro..
Not all peoples
But there is an hidden truth here you r thinking on poverty & population from ur view Ayodhya is a small issue but why its not possible to tackle the smaller issue then how can you solve the bigger one indian poor s are pretty much Happy and Mentally stable than European & US citizens but because of slow court system india is falling No beaurocracy cares first we need to focus on court system rather than poverty and population..
Great video! Hello from Brazil :)
Leon e Nilce FÃS why brazil looks like the same as Chinese?🤪🤪
@@markshao3901 There are some areas in Sao Paulo and Parana that were colonized by Japanese. They still conserve the Japanese language as spoken and written in 1910s. Sometimes, Japanese linguists came here to see firsthand how their language changed. So, some Brazilians look like the ethnic Japanese they are.
Mad James ok glad to know.
@@markshao3901 Well, Brazil is made by immigrants, so we have a mix of ethnicities and culture all together, we have a lot Japanese people (actually Outside Japan, Brazil it's the country with more Japanese People in the world), German people, Italian people, African people and Middle East people...
Leon e Nilce FÃS so actually neymar is a Japanese?
Why people think rural and slums are same. Rural areas refers to agricultural and agro- industrial region. Countries with high rural population means their population is engaged in agricultural related activities. Like India's 25% GDP comes just from growing crops. Clear your mind and get education and respect everyone
Never look down upon rural populations, their connection with nature, common sense thinking, work habits and clarity of life is something that us city folk greatly lack. 🙏🙏
They are the one who still believes caste religion etc..
@Lakshmi Rani Sarker Bhai Kabhi village Gaye bhi ho ... I bet you do not have even 1% of the common sense that the villagers have. If we try to inculcate the work ethics that they follow , we will be a totally different person for the good .
@@gaurav0narwal u are burden for country who balmes other unnecessary
I think rural population should be given good education then it will be beneficial for us
I am from rural area, not a village but a second class town
Divya Sri what's ur problem i like village more than my city it's so natural and here in city only pollution dirt vehicles horns poo poo day and night.
When I read the comments of people trying to understand these statistics I feel like I am watching monkeys use tools for the first time.
Living in rural area, it doesn't mean you're poor. It just a choice. Many rich people choose living in rural area because they can become mad if they live in a city that full of air pollution, traffic, criminals, stress etc
Bus ye logon ko souch hai...I m son of farmer...Bht se zada urban se zada pesa but agr sb log city chaly to city pe burde ho jata hai jesy karachi lahore delhi mumbai pe burden hai
This is really a setback for us Indians so much population and still growing. Wow I am terrified.
It's not that bad actually. India was populated since the start. Currently the fertility rate is 2.50. Trust me, this is a good rate. It will be more less in future. You can also contribute to this by not having more than two children.
@@toufikbiswas9737 2.5 is not good rate......don't try to hide the BAD THINGS....😡😡😡👉👉👉2 childs should be max......CHINA adopted 1 child....and today...its fertility rate is
@@chandrashekharhindu9433 It was higher before. It was nearly 6 in the past. It was probably the most fertile country in the world. So now, 2.50 is definitely good and it's going reduce more in the future.
@@toufikbiswas9737 every country had more fertility rates in the past. But the thing is most of them countered it with education/strong control laws. India's already huge population continues to grow with just ⅓ of the land of China. It is a matter of concern.
@@dineshdevjibishnoi Tf? Seriously? Why the fuck is population increasing then? Population is not a concern. Unproductive population is. Every country can turn its population into a productive one. India can too. For your information, there are countries with 7+ even now. Be grateful that India is not among those countries.
Pakistan- my rural population is more than the rural population of the European Union. 😎😎
India - calm down bro, my rural population is more than the entire population of Europe 😏🤣
Pakistan- 😩😩😩
Vietnam and US end up being neighbor at this aspect 😅
Living in the city make me tired.. i need to go to a village sometimes for cleaning my brain and lung... But yeah getting money in the city is easier
wawamu always has the best background music
In India , we have very very huge cities and many interior villages as well..India is the country of extremes..
Another important thing which most people especially westerners don't understand over here is that remote rural areas don't necessarily mean bad . There are many rural villages with good quality lives with reliable income and happy lifestyles . And you have millions living in worst loving conditions in the Bollywood mega city of Mumbai . Enough to say how rural and urban can't always be substituted for backward and progressed respectively
Hello there.
@@mirzahamzabaig5667
Hello..
But still there is no toilets!
@@bluefairy7304 keep living in 1950s . More 89% of Indian household (including rural ones ) have toilet now . 96%+ of Indian population has access to toilet . The new govt (which has been in power since 2014) took measures to ensure sanitation problems are eradicated from India and this has been by far the most effective and successful project of the govt . In 2012,only 51% of population had toilet access now it is 96%+ . I myself had to travel through very poor rural areas recently and could clearly see the difference and the massive improvement in sanitation . So if you want to continue to beleive that India is still just another poor backward country then keep living in dreams lol
Singapore: Am I a joke to you?
Singapore Rurals Are 0%
Singapore was a rural village which was denied assimilation with Malaysia. But then they became a world class city which was a tight slap on Malaysia
Dream a
2:07 speed of India is insane
Why people consider rural areas bad? I love having pure food rather than canned food. And life is also much more beautiful in rural areas than industrialised and deserted urban areas. During Antichrist time, you all will miss rural life. Because there would be no pure food, pure milk, pure honey and pure life.
Galaxy I think you should review your high school geography course.
3:00 Thailand: EVERYBODY MOVE TO THE CITY
Wooo The Philippines become Rank 9th soon Passed United states.
That's not a good thing to celebrate lol
JZK Yeaah Ikr
A
We need more cities in India more rural population indicates people are too much dependent on farming and thats why per capita farm income is very low..
Embedded Projects we need high tech support in farming so they can live wisely more cities more pollution.
@@anitoshpaswan309 yes we need advanced farming technique but then again it will reduce labour work, so ultimately people will have to find new jobs..
Embedded Projects so maybe u never visited village therefore u don't know why they need kids as a man power.
Embedded Projects so maybe u never visited village therefore u don't know why they need kids as a man power.
@@anitoshpaswan309 Half of my family stays in village in kutch, people doing only farming don't have good income , only there basic needs are covered, while water is another problem. As family grows more land will be divided so lesser the income, with small land and unpredictable rainfall only modern technique and few people involved can make farming profitable..
Excellent choice of category to measure. With different conflicting trends underlying the data.
It's also great to see graphics that doesn't follow the expected preconception that "bigger = better, shrinking = worsening". This has more nuance to it.
Bangladeshi rural population began to decline from 2017.
Government has taken a project named "my village, my city". Hope within 2027 entire Bangladesh will turn into a city. Over density is the key reason behind the prospect.
Government is making hosing project for all the people with all modern facilities. Every citizen will get planned & modern housing within 2035.
Stop climbing the fence, stop producing like pigs.
@@foreverdreamer9171 LoL I think u are taking some expired Weeds, look at statistics BDesh growth is below 1.3% in 2019, In fact u India are producing like PIGs.
@@foreverdreamer9171 We don't visit country, where people are still Toiletless and shit on the train track.
@Joy Mohammad I am an indian, and this indo bangla hatred is generally because of 1. Cricket 2. West Bengal being a lefty state and other indians not liking it, its not actually Bangladesh's fault, as a matter of fact, BD has a huge opportunity to grow with India economically, considering you have a huge and concentrated population and access to sea, if Northern India and Bangladesh work together with upcoming Sagarmala projects in Hooghly and Ganga river, Bengal delta could become a major shipping Hub
Indonesia lost nearly 7 millions of rural population since 1992.
Never thought I'd hear this song again
I've been scrolling down the comment section, and I've noticed a lot of people are saying that having a large rural population is good because it means there'll be a larger labour force for growing more food.
Well no.
Having more people in the countryside doesn't mean there'll be a greater food supply. If you want food supplies to increase, then your best chance is to purchase food from abroad. Why else do you think globalisation is a thing. If you can't provide yourself want you needor want, buy it from someone else.
Finding out how many people are living in rural areas can help determine how successfully a country has been developing.
What should be happening in emerging countries is enormous numbers of people from the rural areas migrating to cities. There should be an overall decline in the number of rural-dwelling inhabitants and a big increase in people living in urban settlements. Whats happening in countries like Brazil and Indonesia are good examples of this occurance, China even more so.
People in the countryside of developing countries don't want to stay in a life of farming. Almost all people living the countrysides of India are living in permanent poverty. They want to find a better job, earn a decent living, provide for their families. It is easier to find employment in the cities than in the rural periphery. This is why they want to move to cities as it provides more opportunities for them.
If you were in the position of these people, you would think exactly like this. You (someone who lives in or near an urban-sprawl) would think its good that there's many people in rural areas, but in the eyes of the people in the countryside, its the exact opposite.
So in conclusion, yes I suppose that a big rural population means a chance to grow more food, but you have to bear in mind that the most majority of those farmers don't want this life.
If India continues to have a large and growing rural population, the country and especially its people as a whole won't develop as well as you think it would.
@Cash Money and yet the Indian government doesn't have the necessary funding to 'train' its farmers. Many, if not most of them are illiterate.
Cities can get annoying
By this, graph more money should be invested in village then cities, then my country INDIA would develop very fast.
money should be spent on agriculture technology. 50% of indias labor force works for agriculture and they only bring under 10% of gdp contribution. that is a big wastage.
@@dotpls yes and side by side more manufacturing activities should be promoted.
At this rate the rural population chart will look like this by 2050
1.India
2.Pakistan
3.Begladesh
4.China
5.Nigeria
Like for China, comment for India
Srilanka near 80% people living in village but it's HDI good...so village means not bad everywhere
Very toxic comment section
Rural means population below 25,000 not mean poor
What they want show about rural population. I belong to rural area and i am happy. It doesn't make any sense. I am thinking if somebody helps me to know whether its good or bad 🤔🤔🤔🤔
Indonesia 1998 time to urban.
As a Pakistani I know the rural population is decreasing,
We were also living in rural area but almost 10 years ago my family and my all relatives came to urban areas
And in previous 10-15 years many people have came to urban areas,
And I think india's data is also wrong.
पाकिस्तान मुरदाबाद।
@@Fire_Editz420 english ya pher roman hindi ma likhey jase ma likh raha hun.
I think you misunderstood it...
Rural population is still growing because of their fertility rate.
But it is actually growing at a slower pace whereas Urban population is growing faster than ever in both the countries.
It is better to look at Percentage of urban-rural population by time
Rural areas increasing population by fertility rate
The Chinese economic reform that was started in 18 December 1978, led the serious gap between poverty and wealth.
Excessive taxation, local corruption and declining services are problems faced by many people in the countryside.
That's why Chinese Village was Drained by Migrant Labor.
The decreasing rural population from 1995 could have lived hard time.
We just watch the numbers now, but the number one and one was each person's life.
If you know about the history, you should enjoy this chart more.
Having more urban population does not mean a country is developed
Indians after seeing this video: India > China 😐
Indians arent dumbo like you.
Found the triggered indian
@@brandiquesenberry2292 Found a narcissist Foreigner.
@@rajeshsharmajaipur congratulations brother, our country will become most developed and most powerful country in 2025.
@@avdeshalvaraz7721 There is nothing to congratulate or become sad for we Indians here. Having greater rural populace is niether boon nor curse.
Life at the rural area but easy access to the city is the best
Guess I'm early this time, cool.
Please make a video about total Sales of eletric cars
who else doesn't comment when they're early?
Good one. Can you do one with percentage of total population.
would've been a lot better to show percentages instead of total
Well rural population doesn't mean that poor but condition of Indian agriculture sector is very backward technology compared to other countries. India just have to improve it's technology in agriculture and they will see a boom in Indian economy. In the state of punjab there are farmers that own Mercedes and other luxury cars. And the people here saying that due to largest rural population india will never develop let me tell them that its just a matter of advanced tech and literacy rate of Indian villages that could literally skyrocket Indian farmer's wealth. Farming is not bad when you can own Mercedes and a large bungalow.
Yes Pakistan at no.3 ... I love village life in Pakistan....
Pakistan is still 7 to 8 times smaller in comparison to India.. Although in area Pakistan is 4 times smaller but in population Pakistan is 8 times smaller.. Lol
Because of Balochistan , density of Balochistan is very less , but its very high in Punjab , by th way it is 6th largest country ...
@@HassanAskari-vt4do Punjab isn't even half the size of uttar Pradesh which has 25 crore population but area is almost same as Pakistan Punjab.. Whole Pakistan is smaller than UP(UTTAR PRADESH) in population..HAHA
@@auliyasufisrealheroesofisl4730 Yes i know UP is very populated state ..but i was only saying that rural life is much better then urban,
@@kevintheminion1497 yeah thats why india is seen as a future superpower and not pakistan. İt is only because india has 8 times more manpower than pakistan..
China and indonesia doing great
Brazil (my country) was one of the countries that had the most rural exodus of people to the cities this is due to the Juscelino Kubitscheck policy with the construction of Brasilia (Capital of the Country) which in 20 years already has 6 million people, this Here are a lot of people who migrated from rural areas in a short time, besides we have the cities of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro one of them is the most populous in America.
Cheio de desinformação nesse seu comentário.
EXACTLY !!!! Whatever I buy, it says 'maDe In CHinA'......
But now India is on the lead compared to China.
Make It Easy lol so you don't know what the word rural means
@Tejas Misra China is lot big country mate . Even US is not comparable to China now a days
@@dt8129 yeah man
@Tejas Misra Far ever my knowledge concerns , India shares lot of problems from its border dispute to poverty problems unlike China so it's obvious to see India lagging behind china in infrastructure , industry. I been to Mumbai , that city is quite good in infrastructure with lot of big skylines , metros , Industry but it shares lot of problems of slums . So these basic things indirectly affect on other Index of country .
Great move by China govt.. 80% Industrial +20%Agriculture with modern technology is perfect fit for a country.. Come on India 💪💪💪
Why come On? It's better if indian goverments focus on education sector and agricultural engg, huge population with better tech can feed the entire world for years and provide fantastic export potential too, better to have well governed villages than huge cities that do not value human life
I wonder what will happend when starlink will be fully operationnal. People will start living in rural areas once more.
People who think rural I'd bad so I don't where they get food from??
O Brasil (meu país), foi um dos países que mais teve o exodo rural de pessoas para as cidades isso se deve a política Juscelino Kubitscheck com construção de Brasília (Capital do País) que em 20 anos já tem 6 milhões de pessoas, isso aqui é muita pessoas que migraram das áreas rurais em pouco tempo, além disso temos as cidades de São Paulo e Rio de Janeiro uma delas é mais populosas da America.
Brasília em 57 anos tem 3,8 milhões de habitantes. De onde tu tirou 6 milhões em 20 anos?
A política de urbanização já vem bem antes do período JK, desde os anos 20 o Brasil começou a se urbanizar rapidamente. Agora a colonização do Norte/Centro-Oeste teve impulso na gestão de JK realmente, acredito que vc tenha se confundido nesse ponto. E o DF e entorno tem quase 4,5 milhões de pessoas e não 6 milhões nos dias atuais.
I THINK RURAL POPULATION LIVE MUCH HAPPIER LIFE IN PEACE
lol villages r depressing
@@dotpls that's a subjective statement, I live in a rich village, for me overcrowded cities are depressing where people are used as a resource rather than being treated as a person
Fat Schize the word "rich" and "village" can never go together, ESPECIALLY if you're indian. i've lived in a village in europe and it was awful, and now i live in a large city. im happy and make enough money to buy most luxuries now.
Isn't it good that people are still connected to their root & not running towards the city like crazy....🤔
Hey these stats are wrong
,for example they are also counting places like Matunga or Borivali as rural area,
you get it?
@@tamalsengupta5377 yeah.. i know that but for government, prior goal should be providing job & technology into their city/town/village... So judging a country based on these type of comparison are totally wrong. There is nothing wrong to live in a village or small town.
@@shivigupta6878 sure, i agree...
@@shivigupta6878 I don't think being connected with your root does any help in the long run urbanization is important it is probably the only way a country can provide better education , Healthcare and employment to its people also its very good for controlling its population and by urbanization i mean controlled urbanization not some kind of unplanned mass migration
surprised to see alot people think this no.1 is something............. please....
I thought indians were moving to cities but they are moving to villages
lol. they're moving to cities, but the fertility rate is so high in rural areas that the rural population is still increasing somehow!
@@dotpls True, that's probably the reason why indian governments haven't been able to control population explosion, they are focusing in the wrong places
That's because of high TFR rate in Rural areas!!!!!!!!
@@waitwhat3547 Population is growing slowly in India
@@Data-xh9wh Yes
Agriculture is important to a country
more people in rural doesn't translate to agricultural productivity increase
@@ramen4131 I got it.
Yes, but technologic development and advances is the best thing.
@@vitorleite3095 both are needed . Without adequate agriculture you don't have food to eat so no chance of living . And without technology development you will have backward infrastructure and facilities .
Nice data visualization. Though I don't think the comparison in this video has much meaning. The quality of rural life differs from country to country. The reason for the decline in the rural population can be urbanization which is usually but not necessarily a sign of progress or a decline in the total population which is alarming.
Nos salvamos al final, epico. (mx)
China’s urbanization rate has increased from 30% to the current 60%. It took 40 years to complete. The target for China’s urbanization rate is 70%. It will take at least 10 to 20 years. An urbanization rate of 70% is a reasonable ratio for China. Because of the flat terrain in northern China, agriculture can be intensive and large-scale, which greatly improves agricultural efficiency. Now northern China is also the main producer of food in China. However, in the hills and mountains of northwest and southwest China, agricultural development has always been restricted, with cash crops as the mainstay, and a large agricultural population is needed.
It doesnt represent Poverty.... It represents that the purity of south asia
Hay que tener en cuenta también la proporción, pero eso no quita que la India sea especialmente grave por la gestión tan masiva que se tendrá que hacer para la distribución de la población. Si quieren llevar gente a las ciudades, tendrán que construir incluso más rápido y en mayores cantidades que China, ya que su población está creciendo aún más rápido que la de su vecino.
Please make on young population
I guess thts could possibly be the only chart that you will see China moving down the ranking order for total rural population. Another possible one would be birth rate/total population. Urbanisation is a sign of modernisation, but rapid urbanisation may bring a few environmental and societal issues. However, if it's well managed, is actually a gd thing.
Do it one with city population!
India's Delhi At Top
@@zuboy4272 actually tokyo is no.1
@@zuboy4272 I think Tokiyo and Turkey's capital Istanbul are on top .
this video really explain why liziqi has become one of the most successful Influencer in China,Just look at the tremendous amount of Urbanized population.
Wow ! Pakistan is 3rd ! And Surpassed whole Europe !
Well not all rural areas in Pakistan are actually rural. They are usually suburban areas...
@Ahabbscience Studio
Yeah not all of them are, but most of them are
2017 Philippines has beaten USA
Philippines: *happy filipino screams*
USA: *INTERNAL SCREAMING*
2018 back to normal
Philippines: *angry filipino voices*
USA: *national anthem plays*
Is this a good thing to win?
wigglebot23 no
The fall of Brazil and EU
@Infinite Being why? People in Hong Kong can use UA-cam right?
Save hong kong!
brazil urbanization is incredible considering the total population is only rising
Most young population
2000 - 2200
Sangeeta Yadav pleaseeeee i agree
These are people who live a good life...no pollution...no tension of jobs...have good lands to farm...
Really.. sometimes rain never appears .. they only eat 2 times a day... They don't get clean water... Planting and harvesting is soo difficult etc
First time China begins first and begins to wane (good thing).
I live in a village. I have Electricity,water, telephone, internet, gas pipeline to supply natural gas for cooking and could also use electric equipment for cooking, proper under ground drainage system, can buy almost every thing from supermarkets. Easy transportation to go anywhere then how am I living in poverty?. Most of people living here are in good financial condition. I fail to understand what more a city can offer me, polluted air and crowded pathways and metro stations?? Naah, I am good :)
This is a common misconception urban indians have because they watch news which are either foreign that focus on shithole cities like delhi or north indian villages in UP bihar and Jharkhand and eastern maharashtra which are bad generally
Pakistan has made biggest achievements by jumping from 9th to 3rd WOW 😉
Not an achievement...lol...😂
What about India number one in the world
@@chaitulion2672 ye khuss hone ki baat nahi hai 😭😭😭😭😭😭
@@rohitkashyap321 ye parshan houny ki bt ni humra south asia k agriculture country hain rural awam hogi agriculture achi hogi urban pe burden kam hoga...Warna lahore or Karachi ka burden to apko pata hai
@@chaitulion2672 that sounds stupid af...
Have a look at the % of urban-rural population data.
Both India and Pakistan are at 35% respectively (2021).
But India is Urbanizing faster than Pakistan.
Can you make a prediction version of this?
No
@@tronalddump6768
Sorry, but I didn't ask you.
*3:45*
*-México has left the chat-*
Ford Fiesta Blanco that’s not really a good meme
@@profilepicture828 no es un meme ._.
F
Ford Fiesta Blanco haha that’s so funny
One small error about the explanation of one child police of China: each family only can have one child whether the first one is girl or boy, except ethnic minorities.
Chinese leaders deserve Nobel Peace Price!
Never going to happen. Bashing China is politically correct in the west, so is Nobel Peace Prize. If you make China look bad, then you will probably win the prize; if you actually make China a better place, you are out of luck for the Prize.
@@BSPBuilder China is a authoritarian state and deserves to be bashed
Look what they are doing in Hong kong
@@gugsX98 What they are doing? You mean these:
1. HongKong Police use his throat to cut the knife of peaceful protester
ua-cam.com/video/4ggO8p9DAlM/v-deo.html
2. Chinese Banker use his face to hit the fist of of peaceful protester
ua-cam.com/video/X-GR88q8pIw/v-deo.html
What the China doing in Hong Kong is really bad!! LOL.
@@gugsX98 China government did nothing to Hong Kong except providing economic support. All the shit is between Hong Kong government and Hong Kong people.
The CCP leaders that ruled China inbetween Mao and Xi actually deserve Nobel peace prize as they were the one who made China the powerhouse it is today but Xi is now ruining China's international image by bullying and threatening all of China's neighbouring countries and disturbing peace in Asia.
Many people in the chat have misinterpreted I guess..
Declining Rural Population is NOT good at all..
A country Depends upon Rural Population for Food..Is there's no one to Grow Food in Rural areas then who tf will provide food??
Correct me if I am wrong! 😁😅
So China has most urban population in the world.
Hong I wouldn’t call it ‘urban’
@@AB-im6de what is it then? City?
ua-cam.com/video/Hm3gf5HEAyw/v-deo.html
Well if you guys think Rural Population is useless and Urban Population is very rich and important, then you are wrong because Rural population doesn't create pollution and Urban Population does creates a lot of Pollution
Anyone else recognize the music. (Cell)
Wow. I was thinking the same
Who made the song?
Please make projection video of this topic
Dont u forget that India is an agricultural based country.
And that's the reason India is poor
@@tronalddump6768 get a quality education.. slums are the reason for poverty not the Agricultural villages
@@marveljason7533 I think you are.. agriculture only contributes 15% of Indian economy but 60% of our population is depend on agriculture... And not all farmers can grow crops in their land... Those who live in slums are most probably one of those farmers
Indonesia
Rural
1968 = 117 M
1993 = 126 M
2018 = 119 M
2020 = 117 M
Urban
1968 = 15 M
1993 = 72 M
2004 = 100 M
2018 = 147 M
2020 = 152 M
indian gov shows more focus on rural development and agricultral growth which is good rather then converting rural areas into urban by building another stream of unemployed population💪💪
Urbanization has its own advantages and disadvantages
No, Urbanization is the future. See Netherlands and Belgium. They are 95% urbanised.
@@toufikbiswas9737 Nope, it's not the future, rural and urban population should have a balance. Look at China, the amount of pollution is concentrated only along the costal line.
@@manjunathmmp I already given you two examples. Now you can think whatever you want. Wherever there is people, it needs to be urbanised. Netherlands and Belgium have denser population than India. But check how beautiful they look. Urbanisation is the future. To be precise, it's sustainable urbanisation.
@@toufikbiswas9737 There is no need to urbanize everything in this world. Also please look into Belgium and Netherlands contribution to Global CO2 emission per capita and this year in Europe the summer was extreme. This is one example of over urbanization
@@manjunathmmp Dude, you are forgetting that Netherlands is heavily industrialised country. If it was just villages there instead of cities, the carbon footprint would not be much different. Most of the Dutches use waterways, bicycles and public transport. They use technology to reduce pollution. Heat storm is happening everywhere. I will say it again. If there are people in a place, it needs to urbanise. Urbanisation is the future.
How is "rural population" defined?
What makes population rural/urbanized?
industrialization
@@wangchuang2040 So if you have a job/are selling your labour/not work on the fields you're automatically part of the "urban population"?
@Henonaga What? So urban population living in poverty is considered rural population?
And the suburbs of Budapest, for example, or villages that are considered part of Zurich metropolitan area are considered "rural population" in that sense?
@@ireminmon It may be a person, a family or a group to be engaged in industry or other service industries supporting industry without land.
@@wangchuang2040 I live in a village but work in a near town. Am I urban or rural population?
What's the song's title? Its pretty good
India: Yay im first noobs
China: i know but this dude is following u
Pakistan:
*HIPPITY HOPPITY I WANT UR THROPHY PROPERTY*
What?
I don't know about other countries but high rural population for India is a good sign. If they move to cities then illegal occupation of land rises. So it's better they stay in the village and develop their itself.